Cell Association in Cellular Networks

Ekram Hossain; Mehdi Rasti; Long Bao Le

doi:10.1017/9781316212493.010

9 - Cell Association in Cellular Networks

from Part III - Physical Layer Resource Allocation in Wireless Networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 May 2017

Ekram Hossain ,

Mehdi Rasti and

Long Bao Le

Show author details

Ekram Hossain: Affiliation:
University of Manitoba, Canada
Mehdi Rasti: Affiliation:
Amir Kabir University of Technology
Long Bao Le: Affiliation:
Université du Québec, Montréal

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

One of the important issues in infrastructure-based multi-cell wireless networks is properly associating mobile user equipments (UEs) to the serving BSs. In the literature, this is usually referred to as user association, cell association, cell selection, or BS assignment. We will use the term “cell association” in this chapter. Obviously, in a wireless network with dense deployment of the BSs, the number of potential BSs with which a UE can be associated is increased. The network densification necessitates the need for designing optimal and/or distributed cell association (BSs assignment to UEs) schemes. This is because, if the UEs are not properly associated with BSs, it may result in reduced throughput, increased interference, inefficient energy consumption, and load imbalance, in uplink and/or downlink.

In Chapters 6 and 7, it was assumed that cell association is already performed (i.e., fixed BS assignment). In fact, in those chapters a fixed cell association is assumed, under which the power control and joint power and admission control problems were defined and addressed. In this chapter, we assume the BS assigned to each UE is not fixed and can be dynamically determined.

Cell association can be performed separately or jointly with other resource allocation schemes. For instance, cell association can be performed based on some metric such as the received (pilot) signal strength, or it can be performed jointly with power control or channel allocation. In this chapter, we first briefly present the system model introduced in Chapter 5 and make a little change in notations to make it suitable for studying the problem of dynamic cell association. Then the joint cell association and power control (CAPC) schemes are studied, followed by a review of the existing approaches for distributed cell association schemes (where cell association is performed separately and independently from the power control). Finally, open challenges and problems are discussed.

System Model and Notations

We consider the same system model presented in Chapter 5, which is briefly introduced again in this chapter.

Type: Chapter
Information: Radio Resource Management in Wireless Networks
An Engineering Approach
, pp. 276 - 288

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316212493.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1]S. V., Hanly “An algorithm for combined cell-site selection and power control to maximize cellular spread spectrum capacity,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 13, no. (7), Sep. 1995, pp. 1332–1340.Google Scholar

[2]R. D., Yates and C., Huang, “Integrated power control and base station assignment,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 1995, pp. 638–644.

[3]F., Rashid-Farrokhi,K. J., Ray Liu and L., Tassiulas “Downlink power control and base station assignment,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 1, no. (4), July 1997, pp. 102–104.Google Scholar

[4]I., Guvenc “Capacity and fairness analysis of heterogeneous networks with range expansion and interference coordination,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 15, no. (10), 2011, pp. 1084–1087.Google Scholar

[5]Q., Ye,B., Rong, Y., Chen,M., Al-Shalash, C., Caramanis and J. G., Andrews “User association for load balancing in heterogeneous cellular networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 12, no. (6), June. 2013, pp. 2706–2716.Google Scholar

[6]H., Kim,G., Veciana, X., Yang and M., Venkatachalam “Distributed α-optimal user association and load balancing in wireless networks,” IEEE/ACM Transaction on Networking, vol. 20, no. (1), Feb. 2012, pp. 177–190.Google Scholar

[7]I., Siomina and D., Yuan “Analysis of cell load coupling for LTE network planning and optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol., 2012, pp. 2287–2297.

[8]J., Sangiamwong,Y., Saito, N. Miki, T. Abe, S., Nagata and Y., Okumura “Investigation on cell selection methods associated with inter-cell interference coordination in HetNets for LTE-A downlink,” in Proceedings of European Wireless Conference on Sustainable Wireless Technologies, vol. 11, no. (6), 2011, pp. 2287–2297.Google Scholar

[9] E., Hossain, M., Rasti, H., Tabassum and A. G., Abdelnasser, “Evolution toward 5G multitier cellular wireless networks: An interference management perspective,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 12, no. (6), June. 2014, pp. 118–127.Google Scholar

[10] A., Mesodiakaki, F., Adelantado, L., Alonso, and C., Verikoukis, “Energy-efficient user association in cognitive heterogeneous networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 52, July 2014, no. (7), pp. 22–29.Google Scholar

[11] M., Rasti, A. R., Sharafat and J., Zander, “A distributed dynamic target-SINR-tracking power control for wireless cellular networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 59, no. (2), Feb. 2010, pp. 906–916.Google Scholar

[12] M., Rasti and A. R., Sharafat “Distributed uplink power control with soft removal for wireless networks,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 59, no. (3), March. 2011, pp. 833– 843.Google Scholar

[13] S., Sekander, H., Tabassum and E., Hossain “A matching game for decoupled uplinkdownlink user association in full-duplex small cell networks,” in IEEE Globecom'15, San Diego, CA, Dec. 6–10, 2015.

[14] F., Boccardi, J., Andrews, H., Elshaer, M., Dohler, S., Parkvall, P., Popovski and S., Singh “Why to decouple the uplink and downlink in cellular networks and how to do it?” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 54, no. (3), Mar. 2016, pp. 110–117.Google Scholar

[15] S., Singh, X., Zhang and J. G., Andrews, “Joint rate and SINR coverage analysis for decoupled uplink-downlink biased cell associations in HetNets?” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 14, May 2015, pp. 5360–5373.Google Scholar