Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:20:48.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - Experimental dynamical decoupling

from Part VII - Applications and implementations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2013

Lorenza Viola
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College
Daniel A. Lidar
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Todd A. Brun
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access

Summary

Introduction and overview

As mentioned in Chapter 4, dynamical decoupling (DD) techniques have developed decades of tradition in the context of NMR spectroscopy, where they continue to play a pervasive role throughout all aspects of imaging and coherent control of multi-spin dynamics in the liquid and solid state. A dedicated experimental characterization and exploitation of DD as a tool for high-fidelity dynamical control and decoherence suppression in different quantum information processing (QIP) platforms has been undertaken only in more recent years, largely enabled by impressive laboratory progress in fast and ultrafast coherent control capabilities over the past decade. Without attempting to provide a comprehensive in-depth account, it is our goal in this chapter to highlight some key experimental advances to illustrate the significance of DD strategies for near-term practical quantum error control in QIP; and justify why, quoting from a recent experimental work [MTA+06], they “will likely form a quintessential element in real quantum computers.”

The large majority of dynamical error-suppression implementations in QIP have aimed thus far to validate DD as a tool for enhanced quantum memory in different qubit devices in the presence of various decoherence mechanisms. Likewise, with the exception of a recent work reporting the suppression of collisional decoherence using a “continuous spin echo” close in spirit to Eulerian DD [SAD10], the majority of experiments have employed (sufficiently) “hard” pulses, such that any evolution other than that due to the control field could be taken as negligible and the bang-bang (BB) limit formalized in Chapter 4 invoked as an adequate approximation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×