Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:34:12.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

C - Imputation of Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2009

Michael Bratton
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Robert Mattes
Affiliation:
University of Cape Town
E. Gyimah-Boadi
Affiliation:
University of Ghana
Get access

Summary

IMPUTATION OF DATA

Two types of survey responses require special discussion. The first occurs when respondents choose a “don't know” (DK) response. For frequency distributions, DK responses present no difficulty: we simply report the proportion of respondents who choose this option along with those choosing other responses, all as proportions of all valid responses (excluding missing data). For statistical analysis, however — such as calculating means or correlation coefficients — DKs can present special problems. On the questionnaire, these responses are often placed at the end of response scales and numbered accordingly, such as a 5 on a scale that runs from “0 = never” to “4 = every day.” However, in this case, computer statistical programs read the DK to signify a substantive value of 5. To prevent this, a standard procedure is to set all DKs as “missing” to make them invisible to statistical analysis. One drawback to this option is that it reduces the number of effective cases, thus limiting our confidence that the results apply across the entire sample, and the population that it represents (more on this below).

Moreover, “don't know” is often a legitimate, substantive answer that should be taken into account rather than discarded. Wherever possible, our preferred alternative is to recode DK to theoretically defensible spots on the response scale. For example, for many of the questions about political participation, we assumed that those who did not know whether they had ever taken a specific course of action had in fact never done so.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×