Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 586–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adekunle, A. A. & Fatunbi, A. O. (2012). Approaches for setting-up multi-stakeholder platforms for agricultural research and development. World Applied Sciences Journal, 16(7), 981–988.Google Scholar

Academy of Sciences (2014). Building Community Disaster Resilience through Private–Public Collaboration. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Ackermann, F. & Eden, C. (2011). Strategic management of stakeholders: Theory and practice. Long Range Planning, 44, 179–196.Google Scholar

Agger, A. & Jensen, J. O. (2015). Area-based initiatives – and their work in bonding, bridging and linking social capital. European Planning Studies, 23(10), 2045–2061.Google Scholar

Ahn, H. C. (2007). Design tools and three steps in participatory design processes: A proposal for better communications among residents and experts, based on a case project of neighborhood park in Seoul, Korea. In 6th Conference of the Pacific Rim Community Design Network. pp. 1–10. http://courses.washington.edu/quanzhou/pacrim/proceedings.htmlGoogle Scholar

Alexander, E. R. (2005). Institutional transformation and planning: From institutionalization theory to institutional design. Planning Theory, 4(3), 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alford, J. (2014). The multiple facets of co-production: Building on the work of Elinor Ostrom. Public Management Review, 16(3), 299–316.Google Scholar

Alford, J. (2010). Public value from co-production with clients. In Moore, M. H. & Benington, J., eds., Public Value: Theory and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 144–157.Google Scholar

Alford, J. (2009). Engaging Public Sector Clients: From Service-Delivery to Co-Production. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Alford, J. (2002). Defining the client in the public sector: A social-exchange perspective. Public Administration Review, 62(3), 337–346.Google Scholar

Alford, J. (1998). A public management road less travelled: Clients as co‐producers of public services. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 57(4), 128–137.Google Scholar

Alford, J. & Yates, S. (2016). Co‐production of public services in Australia: The roles of government organisations and co‐producers. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 75(2), 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alves, H. (2013). Co-creation and innovation in public services. The Service Industries Journal, 33(7–8), 671–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, K. R. (1971). Concepts of Corporate Strategy. Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar

Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2006). Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance. In Boyne, G. A., Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J. Jr, & Walker, R. M. eds., Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 14–34.Google Scholar

Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2013). Escaping capability traps through problem driven iterative adaption (PDIA). World Development, 51, 234–244.Google Scholar

Ansell, C. (2019). Coping with conceptual pluralism: Reflections on concept formation. Public Performance & Management Review, 1–22, DOI: 10.1080/15309576.2019.1677254Google Scholar

Ansell, C. (2016). Pragmatism. In Ansell, C. & Torfing, J., eds., Handbook of Theories of Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 392–401.Google Scholar

Ansell, C. (2011). Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansell, C. & Bartenberger, M. (2019). Pragmatism and Political Crisis Management: Principle and Practical Rationality during the Financial Crisis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Ansell, C. & Bartenberger, M. (2017). The diversity of experimentation in the experimenting society. In Poel, I., Asveld, L., & Mehos, D. C., eds., New Perspectives on Technology in Society. London: Routledge, pp. 36–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansell, C. & Bartenberger, M. (2016). Varieties of experimentalism. Ecological Economics, 130, 64–73.Google Scholar

Ansell, C. & Gash, A. (2017). Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansell, C. & Gash, A. (2012). Stewards, mediators, and catalysts: Toward a model of collaborative leadership. The Innovation Journal, 17(1), 2–21.Google Scholar

Ansell, C. & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.Google Scholar

Ansell, C. & Geyer, R. (2017). “Pragmatic complexity” a new foundation for moving beyond “evidence-based policy making”? Policy Studies, 38(2), 149–167.Google Scholar

Ansell, C., Lundin, M., & Öberg, P. (2017). How learning aggregates: A social network analysis of learning between Swedish municipalities. Local Government Studies, 43(6), 903–926.Google Scholar

Ansell, C. & Miura, S. (2019). Can the power of platforms be harnessed for governance? Public Administration, 98(1), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansell, C. & Torfing, J. (eds.) (2018). How Does Collaborative Governance Scale? Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar

Ansell, C. & Torfing, J. (2014). Public Innovation through Collaboration and Design. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2020). The social embedding of generic governance instruments. In Meek, J., ed., Handbook on Collaborative Public Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2017). Improving policy implementation through collaborative policymaking. Policy and Politics, 45(3), 467–486.Google Scholar

Ansell, C. & Trondal, J. (2017). Governing turbulence: An organizational-institutional agenda. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(1), 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate Strategy: Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Anttiroiko, A. V. (2016). City-as-a-platform: The rise of participatory innovation platforms in Finnish cities. Sustainability, 8(9), 922.Google Scholar

Aragón, P., Kaltenbrunner, A., Calleja-López, A., Pereira, A., Monterde, A., Barandiaran, X. E., & Gómez, V. (2017). Deliberative platform design: The case study of the online discussions in Decidim Barcelona. In Ciampaglia, G., Mashhadi, A., & Yasseri, T., eds., Social Informatics. SocInfo 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10540. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Autio, E. & Thomas, L. (2014). Innovation ecosystems: Implications for innovation management? In Dodgson, M., Gann, D. M., & Phillips, N., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 204–228.Google Scholar

Bache, I. & Flinders, M. (2004). Multi-level governance and the study of the British State. Public Policy and Administration, 19(1), 31–51.Google Scholar

Bächtiger, A. (2014). Debate and deliberation in legislatures. In Martin, S., Saalfeld, T., & Strøm, K., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–166.Google Scholar

Badaracco, J. L. Jr. (2001). We don’t need another hero. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 120–126.Google Scholar

Banks, J. S. & Weingast, B. R. (1992). The political control of bureaucracies under asymmetric information. American Journal of Political Science, 36(2), 509–524.Google Scholar

Bang, H. (2005). Among everyday makers and expert citizens. In Newman, J., eds., Remaking Governance: Peoples, Politics and the Public Sphere. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 159–178.Google Scholar

Bang, H. P. & Sørensen, E. (1999). The everyday maker: A new challenge to democratic governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 21(3), 325–341.Google Scholar

Banerjee, B. (2010). Designer as Agent of Change. Available at: https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5a9898f92fa8fa00017acfa3/5c63e109cbc13e075f6db2aa_Banny%20Banerjee-Designer%20as%20Agent%20of%20Change.pdfGoogle Scholar

Baptista, N., Alves, H., & Matos, N. (2019). Public sector organizations and co-creation with citizens: A literature review on benefits, drivers, and barriers. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 32(3), 217–214, DOI: 10.1080/10495142.2019.1589623Google Scholar

Barber, B. (1984). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Barber, M. (2008). Instruction to Deliver: Fighting to Transform Britain’s Public Services. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Barnes, M., Newman, J., & Sullivan, H. (2006). Discursive arenas: Deliberation and the constitution of identity in public participation at a local level. Social Movement Studies, 5(3), 193–207.Google Scholar

Barnes, M. (1999). Public Expectations: From Paternalism to Partnership: Changing Relationships in Health and Health Services. London: Nuffield Trust/University.Google Scholar

Bartenberger, M. & Sześciło, D. (2016). The benefits and risks of experimental co‐production: The case of urban redesign in Vienna. Public Administration, 94(2), 509–525.Google Scholar

Bason, C. (2010). Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-Creating for a Better Society. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar

Behn, R. D. (1998). The New Public Management paradigm and the search for democratic accountability. International Public Management Journal, 1(2), 131–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benington, J. (2009). Creating the public in order to create public value? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 232–249.Google Scholar

Benington, J. & Moore, M. H. (2011). Public Value: Theory & Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bennett, N., Wise, C., Woods, P. A., & Harvey, J. A. (2003). Distributed Leadership: A Review of Literature. Nottingham: National College of School Leadership.Google Scholar

Benz, A. & Papadopoulos, I. (2006). Governance and Democracy: Comparing National, European and International Experiences. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Beran, D., Lazo-Porras, M., Cardenas, M. K., Chappuis, F., Damasceno, A., Jha, N., Madede, T., Lachat, S., Leon, S. P., Pastrana, N. A., Pesantes, M. A., Singh, S. B., Sharma, S., Somerville, C., Suggs, S., & Miranda, J. J. (2018). Moving from formative research to co-creation of interventions: Insights from a community health system project in Mozambique, Nepal and Peru. BMJ Global Health, 3(6), e001183.Google Scholar

Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Eriksson, C. I., Ståhlbröst, A., & Svensson, J. (2009). A milieu for innovation: Defining living labs. In Proceedings of the 2nd ISPIM Innovation Symposium: Simulating Recovery. New York: ISPIM.Google Scholar

Bhaskar, R. (2008). A Realist Theory of Science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Biljohn, M. I. M. & Lues, L. (2019). Citizen participation, social innovation, and the governance of local government service delivery: Findings from South Africa. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(3), 229–241, DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2019.1628052Google Scholar

Birchall, J. & Simmons, R. (2004). User Power: The Participation of Users in Public Services. London: National Consumer Council. Available at: www.ncc.org.uk/nccpdf/poldocs/NCC071ft_user_power.pdf.Google Scholar

Bisschops, S. & Beunen, R. (2019). A new role for citizens’ initiatives: The difficulties in co-creating institutional change in urban planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(1), 72–87.Google Scholar

Blair, T. (1998). The Third Way: New Politics for the New Century. London: Fabian Society.Google Scholar

Blais, A. (2007). Turnout in Elections. In Dalton, R. J. & Klingemann, H., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 621–635.Google Scholar

Bobbio, L. (2003). Building social capital through democratic deliberation: The rise of deliberative arenas. Social Epistemology, 17(4), 343–357.Google Scholar

Bohmann, J. (2005). From demos to demoi: Democracy across borders. Ratio Juris, 18(3), 293–314.Google Scholar

Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 251–269.Google Scholar

Bommert, B. (2010). Collaborative innovation in the public sector. International Public Management Review, 11(1), 15–33.Google Scholar

Börzel, T. A. & Panke, D. (2007). Network governance: Effective and legitimate? In Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J., eds., Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 153–166.Google Scholar

Boudjelida, A., Mellouli, S., & Lee, J. (2016). Electronic citizens participation: Systematic review. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Boudreau, K. (2010). Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Science, 56(10), 1849–1872.Google Scholar

Bourgoin, J., Castella, J-C., Pullar, D., Lestrelin, G., & Bouahoun, B. (2012). Toward a land zoning negotiation support platform: “Tips and tricks” for participatory land use planning in Laos. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104(2), 270–278.Google Scholar

Bourgon, J. (2009). New directions in public administration: Serving beyond the predictable. Public Policy and Administration, 24(3), 309–330.Google Scholar

Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community co-production of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860.Google Scholar

Bovaird, T. & Loeffler, E. (2012). From engagement to coproduction: The contributions of users and communities to outcomes and public value. Voluntas, 23(4), 1119–1138.Google Scholar

Bovens, M. (2007a). New forms of accountability and EU governance. Comparative European Politics, 5(1), 104–120.Google Scholar

Bovens, M. (2007b). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.Google Scholar

Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E., & Schillemans, T. (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bovens, M. & Schillemans, T. (2014). Meaningful accountability. In Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E. and Schillemans, T., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 673–682.Google Scholar

Bowen, S., McSeveny, K., Lockley, E., Wolstenholme, D., Cobb, M., & Dearden, A. (2013). How was it for you? Experiences of participatory design in the UK health service. CoDesign, 9(4), 230–246.Google Scholar

Bowler, S. & Glazer, A. (2008). Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Boyle, D. & Harris, M. (2009). The Challenge of Co-production: How Equal Partnership between Professionals and the Public Can Lead to Improved Public Services. London: NESTA.Google Scholar

Boyne, G. A. & Walker, R. M. (2004). Strategy content and public service organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 231–252.Google Scholar

Brabham, D. C. (2013). Crowdsourcing. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, J. (2006). ‘Accountability and Responsibility through Restorative Justice’, in Dowdle, M. (ed.), Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 33–51.Google Scholar

Brandsen, T. & Helderman, J. K. (2012). The trade-off between capital and community: The conditions for successful co-production in housing. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 1139–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandsen, T. & Honingh, M. (2016). Distinguishing different types of co-production: A conceptual analysis based on the classical definitions. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 427–435.Google Scholar

Brandsen, T. & Pestoff, V. (2006). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services: An introduction. Public Management Review, 8(4), 493–501.Google Scholar

Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2018a). Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2018b). How to encourage co-creation and co-production: Some recommendations. In Brandsen, T., Verschuere, B., & Steen, T., eds., Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. New York: Routledge, pp. 299–302.Google Scholar

Bressers, N. (2014). The impact of collaboration on innovative projects: A study of Dutch water management. In Ansell, C. & Torfing, J., eds., Public Innovation through Collaboration and Design. London: Routledge, pp. 89–105.Google Scholar

Briggs, X. D. S. (2008). Democracy as Problem-Solving: Civic Capacity in Communities across the Globe. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brink, E. & Wamsler, C. (2018). Collaborative governance for climate change adaptation: Mapping citizen–municipality interactions. Environmental Policy and Governance, 28(2), 82–97.Google Scholar

Brogaard, L., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J., (2019). The impact of governance on the outcomes of contracting out. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 3(4), 215–233.Google Scholar

Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84.Google Scholar

Brown, T. L., Potoski, M., & Slyke, D. M. (2006). Managing public service contracts: Aligning values, institutions, and markets. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 323–331.Google Scholar

Brudney, J. L. (1990a). Expanding the government-by-proxy construct: Volunteers in the delivery of public services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 19(4), 315–328.Google Scholar

Brudney, J. L. (1990b). The availability of volunteers: Implications for local governments. Administration and Society, 21(4), 413–424.Google Scholar

Brudney, J. L. (1984). Local co-production of services and the analysis of municipal productivity. Urban Affairs Review, 19(4), 465–484.Google Scholar

Brudney, J. L. (1999). The effective use of volunteers: Best practices for the public sector. Law and Contemporary Problems, 62(4), 219-255.Google Scholar

Brudney, J. L. & England, R. E. (1983). Toward a definition of the co-production concept. Public Administration Review, 43(1): 59–65.Google Scholar

Bryson, J. (2018). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organisations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Bryson, J. (2011). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement, 4th edn, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Bryson, J. (2004.) What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53.Google Scholar

Bryson, J. (1988). Strategic planning: Big wins and small wins. Public Money and Management, 8(3), 11–15.Google Scholar

Bryson, J. M. & Crosby, B. C. (1993). Policy planning and the design and use of forums, arenas, and courts. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20(2), 175–194.Google Scholar

Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456.Google Scholar

Bryson, J. M., Cunningham, G. L., & Lykkesmoe, K. J. (2002). What to do when stakeholders matter? The case of problem formulation for the African American Men Project of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 568–584.Google Scholar

Bryson, J. M., Patton, M. Q., & Bowman, R. A. (2011). Working with evaluation stakeholders: A rationale, step-wise approach, and toolkit. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34, 1–12.Google Scholar

Bryson, J., Sancino, A., Benington, J., & Sørensen, E. (2017). Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 640–654.Google Scholar

Buuren, A., Meerkerk, I., & Tortajada, C. (2019). Understanding emergent participation practices in water governance. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 35(3), 367–382.Google Scholar

Bushe, G. R. & Paranjpey, N. (2015). Comparing the generativity of problem solving and appreciative inquiry: A field experiment. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 51(3), 309–35.Google Scholar

Campos-Matos, I., Chrysou, M., & Ashton, C. (2017). Co-creation of local smoking cessation services: An innovative public health intervention in times of austerity. The Lancet, 390, S31.Google Scholar

Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16.Google Scholar

Castiglione, D., Deth, J. W. V., & Wolleb, G. (2008). The Handbook of Social Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cawson, A. (1985). Organized Interests and the State: Studies in Meso-Corporatism. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Cepiku, D. & Giordano, F. (2014). Co-production in developing countries: Insights from the community health workers experience. Public Management Review, 16(3), 317–340.Google Scholar

Christensen, H. E. & McQuestin, D. (2019). Community engagement in Australian local governments: A closer look and strategic implications. Local Government Studies, 45(4), 453–480.Google Scholar

Clark, B. Y, Brudney, J. L., & Jang, S. G. (2013). Coproduction of government services and the new information technology: Investigating the distributional biases. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 687–701.Google Scholar

Clarke, N., Jennings, W., Moss, J., & Stoker, G. (2018). The Good Politician: Folk Theories, Political Interaction, and the Rise of Anti-Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cockburn, C. (2007). From Where We Stand: War, Women’s Activism and Feminist Analysis. London: Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, J. (2007). Deliberative democracy. In Rosenberg, S. W., ed., Deliberation, Participation and Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgave Macmillan, pp. 219–236.Google Scholar

Compton, M. & ‘t Hart, P., eds., (2019). Great Policy Successes. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Conrad, E. (2015). Bridging the hierarchical and collaborative divide: The role of network managers in scaling up a network approach to water governance in California. Policy & Politics, 43(3), 349–366.Google Scholar

Considine, M. (2013). Governance networks and the question of transformation. Public Administration, 91(2), 438–447.Google Scholar

Corballis, M. C. (1992). On the evolution of language and generativity. Cognition, 44(3), 197–226.Google Scholar

Cornwall, A. & Coelho, V. S. (2007). Spaces for Change? The Politics of Citizen Participation in New Democratic Arenas. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar

Cottam, H. & Leadbeater, C. (2004). Health: Co-Creating Services. London: Design Council.Google Scholar

Coursey, D., Pandey, S. K. & Yang, K. (2012). Public service motivation (PSM) and support for citizen participation: A test of Perry and Vandenabeele’s reformulation of PSM Theory. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 572–582.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. J., Rutter, D., & Thelwall, S. (2004). Service User Involvement in Change Management: A Literature Review. London: National Co-ordinating Centre for Service Delivery and Organisation.Google Scholar

Crosby, B. & Bryson, J. M. (2005). Leadership for the Common Good. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Crosby, B. C. & Bryson, J. M. (2010). Integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 211–230.Google Scholar

Crosby, B. C., ‘t Hart, P., & Torfing, J. (2017). Public value creation through collaborative innovation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 655–669.Google Scholar

Crozier, M., Huntington, S., & Watanuki, J. (1975). The Crisis of Democracy. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Cruz-Coke, M. L. (2001). Between stability and crisis in Latin America. Journal of Democracy, 12(1), 137–145.Google Scholar

Cullen, B., Tucker, J., Snyder, K., Lema, Z., & Duncan, A. (2014). An analysis of power dynamics within innovation platforms for natural resource management. Innovation and Development, 4(2), 259–275.Google Scholar

Cuoto, R. A. (2014). Civic leadership. In Rhodes, R. A. W. & ‘t Hart, P., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 347–361.Google Scholar

Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, D. W. & Moreau, C. P. (2007). Thinking inside the box: Why consumers enjoy constrained creative experiences. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 357–369.Google Scholar

Dalton, R. J. (2007). Partisan mobilization, cognitive mobilization and the changing American electorate. Electoral Studies, 26(2), 274–286.Google Scholar

Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic Challenges: Democratic Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dalton, R. J. (2002). The decline of party identifications. In Dalton, R. J. & Wattenberg, M. P., eds., Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–36.Google Scholar

Dalton, R. J. (1999). Political trust in advanced democracies. In Norris, P., ed., Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 57–77.Google Scholar

Dalton, R. J. & Welzel, C. (2014). The Civic Culture Transformed: From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Damgaard, B. & Lewis, J. M. (2014). Accountability and citizen participation. In Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E., & Schillemans, T., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 258–272.Google Scholar

Davies, J. S. (2011). Challenging Governance Theory: From Networks to Hegemony. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar

Davis, A. & Andrew, J. (2017). Co-creating urban environments to engage citizens in a low-carbon future. Procedia Engineering, 180, 651–657.Google Scholar

De Winter, M. (2018). Implementing an integrated care system for chronic patients in Belgium: A co-creation process. International Journal of Integrated Care, 18(S2): 202.Google Scholar

Degnegaard, R. (2014) Co-creation, prevailing streams and a future design trajectory. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and Arts, 10(2), 96–111.Google Scholar

Degnegaard, R., Degnegaard, S., & Coughlan, P. (2015). How to design for large-scale multi-stakeholder co-creation initiatives: Reframing crime prevention challenges with the police in Denmark. Journal of Design, Business & Society, 1(1), 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Della Porta, D. (2013). Can Democracy Be Saved? Participation, Deliberation and Social Movements. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Delwit, P. (2011). Still in decline? Party membership in Europe. In Haute, E., ed., Party Membership in Europe: Exploration into the Anthills of Party Politics. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, pp. 25–42.Google Scholar

Denis, J. L., Hébert, Y., Langley, A., Lozeau, D., & Trottier, L. H. (2002). Explaining diffusion patterns for complex health care innovations. Health Care Management Review, 27(3), 60–73.Google Scholar

Desouza, K. C. & Bhagwatwar, A. (2014). Technology-enabled participatory platforms for civic engagement: The case of US cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 21(4), 25–50.Google Scholar

Dobbin, F., Simmons, B., & Garrett, G. (2007). The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 449‒472.Google Scholar

Dobre, C. C., Ranzato, M., & Moretto, L. (2019). Citizen involvement in co-producing decentralised stormwater systems in Brussels. CoDesign, https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1631356Google Scholar

Doig, J. W. & Hargrove, E. C. (1990). Leadership and Innovation: Entrepreneurs in Government. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Donetto, S., Pierri, P., Tsianakas, V., & Robert, G. (2015). Experience-based co-design and healthcare improvement: Realizing participatory design in the public sector. The Design Journal, 18(2), 227–248.Google Scholar

Dorf, M. C. & Sabel, C. F. (1998). A constitution of democratic experimentalism. Columbia Law Review, 98(2), 267–473.Google Scholar

Downs, A. (1967). Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L. & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Dryzek, J. S. (2000). On the prospects for democratic deliberation: Values analysis applied to Australian politics. Political Psychology, 21(2), 241–266.Google Scholar

Dryzek, J. S. (1994). Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Du Gay, P. (2000). In Praise of Bureaucracy: Weber – Organization – Ethics. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Dunleavy, P. & Hood, C. (1994). From old public administration to New Public Management. Public Money and Management, 14(3), 9–16.Google Scholar

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New Public Management is dead – long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494.Google Scholar

Dunston, R., Lee, A., Boud, D., Brodie, P., & Chiarella, M. (2009). Co-production and health system reform: From re-imagining to re-making. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68(1), 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dzur, A. W. & Hendriks, C. M. (2018). Thick populism: Democracy-enhancing popular participation. Policy Studies, 39(3), 334–351.Google Scholar

Echeverri, P. & Skålén, P. (2011). Co-creation and co-destruction: A practice-theory based study of interactive value formation. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 351–373.Google Scholar

Eck, A. & Uebernickel, F. (2016). Untangling generativity: Two perspectives on unanticipated change produced by diverse actors. 24th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). www.researchgate.net/profile/Alexander_Eck/publication/301295204_Untangling_Generativity_Two_Perspectives_on_Unanticipated_Change_Produced_by_Diverse_Actors/links/5751400108ae10d9336ec215.pdfGoogle Scholar

Eden, C. & Ackermann, F. (1998). Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Edenbolos, J., Buuren, A., & Schie, N. (2011). Co-producing knowledge: Joint knowledge production between experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders in Dutch water management projects. Environmental Science and Policy, 14(6), 675–684.Google Scholar

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.Google Scholar

Eggers, W. D. (2016). Delivering on Digital: The Innovators and Technologies that are Transforming Government. New York: Rosetta Books.Google Scholar

Eijk, C. & Steen, T. (2014). Why people co-produce: Analysing citizens’ perceptions on co-planning engagement in health care services. Public Management Review, 16(3), 358–382.Google Scholar

Eijk, C. & Steen, T. (2016). Why engage in co-production of public services? Mixing theory and empirical evidence. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 28–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eijk, C., Steen, T. & Verschuere, B. (2017). Co-producing safety in the local community: A q-methodology study on the incentives of Belgian and Dutch members of neighbourhood watch schemes. Local Government Studies, 43(3), 323–343.Google Scholar

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2008). From Teams to Knots: Activity-theoretical Studies of Collaboration and Learning at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and Society. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Etzioni-Halevy, E. (1993). The Elite Connection: Problems and Potential of Western Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Evans, R. (1996). The Human Side of School Change: Reform, Resistance, and the Real-Life Problems of Innovation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Fanjoy, M. & Bragg, B. (2019). Embracing complexity: Co-creation with retired immigrant women. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 12(1), 1–16.Google Scholar

Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S. L. & Majchrzak, A. (2011). Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organization Science, 22(5), 1224–1239.Google Scholar

Farr, M. (2016). Co-production and value co-creation in outcome-based contracting in public services. Public Management Review, 18(5), 654–672.Google Scholar

Fawcett, P., Flinders, M., Hay, C., & Wood, M. (2017). Anti-Politics, Depoliticization and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fenwick, J. & McMillan, J. (2013). Management development and co-production: Myths and realities. Journal of Management Development, 32(9), 971–983.Google Scholar

Ferlie, E. & Ongaro, E. (2015). Strategic Management in Public Services Organizations: Concepts, Schools and Contemporary Issues. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fernandez, S. & Rainey, H. G. (2006). Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 168–176.Google Scholar

Fisher, J. C. & Cole, K. M. (1993). Leadership and Management of Volunteer Programs: A Guide for Volunteer Administrators. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar

Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Eden, H., Sugimoto, M., & Ye, Y. (2005). Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4–5), 482–512.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, J. & Lenhart, J. (2016). Eco-districts: Can they accelerate urban climate planning? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(2), 364–380.Google Scholar

Fledderus, J., Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2014). Restoring trust through the co-production of public services: A theoretical elaboration. Public Management Review, 16(3), 424–443.Google Scholar

Fleischmann, K., Hielscher, S., & Merritt, T. (2016). Making things in fab labs: A case study on sustainability and co-creation. Digital Creativity, 27(2), 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleming, L., Mingo, S. & Chen, D. (2007). Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 443–475.Google Scholar

Flinders, M. (2018). The (anti-)politics of Brexit. In Diamond, P., Nedergaard, P., Rosamond, B. & Lequesne, C., eds., The Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Brexit. London: Routledge, pp. 179–193.Google Scholar

Flinders, M. (2012). Defending Politics: Why Democracy Matters in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Flood, J., Minkler, M., Hennessey Lavery, S., Estrada, J., & Falbe, J. (2015). The collective impact model and its potential for health promotion: Overview and case study of a healthy retail initiative in San Francisco. Health Education & Behavior, 42(5), 654–668.Google Scholar

Floridia, A. (2017). From Participation to Deliberation: A Critical Genealogy of Deliberative Democracy. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar

Foerderer, J., Kude, T., Schütz, S., & Heinzl, A. (2014). Control versus generativity: A complex adaptive systems perspective on platforms. 35th International Conference on Information Systems. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2014/proceedings/ServiceScience/4/Google Scholar

Fox, J. A. (2015). Social accountability: What does the evidence really say? World Development, 72, 346–361.Google Scholar

Frantzeskaki, N. & Rok, A. (2018). Co-producing urban sustainability transitions knowledge with community, policy and science. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 29, 47–51.Google Scholar

Franz, Y., Tausz, K., & Thiel, S. K. (2015). Contextuality and co-creation matter: A qualitative case study comparison of living lab concepts in urban research. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(12), 48–55.Google Scholar

Fung, A. (2009). Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Fung, A. (2004). Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Fung, A. & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Galuszka, J. (2019). Co-production as a driver of urban governance transformation? The case of the Oplan LIKAS Programme in metro Manila, Philippines. Planning Theory & Practice, 20(3), 395–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gascó, M. (2017). Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 90–98.Google Scholar

Gascó, M. & Eijk, C. (2018). Case study – the Spanish Project Pla BUITS. In Brandsen, T., Verschuere, B. & Steen, T., eds., Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. New York: Routledge, pp. 77–79.Google Scholar

Gawłowski, R. (2018). Co-production of public services in terms of the Polish experience. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 47(1), 110–120.Google Scholar

Gebauer, H., Johnson, M., & Enquist, B. (2010). Value co-creation as a determinant of success in public transport services: A study of the Swiss federal railway operator (SBB). Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 20(6), 511–530.Google Scholar

Genitsaris, E., Roukouni, A., Stamelou, A., Nalmpantis, D., & Naniopoulos, A. (2017). Co-Creating Innovative Concepts to Address Crucial Trends and Challenges that Public Transport Faces in Thessaloniki. University–Industry Links: Coproducing Knowledge, Innovation & Growth.Google Scholar

Gergen, K. J. (1978). Toward generative theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(11), 1344.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Gloor, P. A. (2006). Swarm Creativity: Competitive Advantage through Collaborative Innovation Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goldman, S. 2003. Assessing the Senate judicial confirmation process: The index of obstruction and delay. Judicature, 86, 251–258.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, S. & Eggers, W. D. (2004). Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Goodin, R. E. (1995). The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gouillart, F. & Billings, D. (2013). Community-powered problem solving. Harvard Business Review, 91(4), 70–77.Google Scholar

Gouillart, F. & Hallett, T. (2015). Co-creation in government. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 13(2), 40–47.Google Scholar

Graaf, S. (2018). Participation and platformization at play. In ComMODify Dynamics of Virtual Work. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.Google Scholar

Graversgaard, M., Hedelin, B., Smith, L., Gertz, F., Højberg, A., Langford, J., Martinez, G., Mostert, E., Ptak, E., Peterson, H., Stelljes, N., Brink, C., & Refsgaard, J. C. (2018). Opportunities and barriers for water co-governance: A critical analysis of seven cases of diffuse water pollution from agriculture in Europe, Australia and North America. Sustainability, 10(5), 1634.Google Scholar

Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Gray, B. & Ren, H. (2014). The importance of joint schemas and brokers in promoting collaboration for innovation. In Ansell, C. & Torfing, J., eds., Public Innovation through Collaboration and Design. London: Routledge, pp. 125–147.Google Scholar

Greenfield, E. A. & Marks, N. F. (2004). Formal volunteering as a protective factor for older adults’ psychological well-being. The Journals of Gerontology, 59(5), 258–264.Google Scholar

Greenhalgh, T., Jackson, C., Shaw, S., & Janamian, T. (2016). Achieving research impact through co‐creation in community-based health services: Literature review and case study. The Milbank Quarterly, 94(2), 392–429.Google Scholar

Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629.Google Scholar

Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–451.Google Scholar

Grönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279–301.Google Scholar

Gutmann, A. & Thompson, D. F. (2009). Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1985). Civil disobedience: Litmus test for the democratic constitutional state. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 30, 95–116.Google Scholar

Hajer, M. A. (2009). Authoritative Governance: Policy Making in the Age of Mediatization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Halmos, A., Misuraca, G., & Viscusi, G. (2019). From public value to social value of digital government: Co-creation and social innovation in European Union initiatives. 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2974–2983.Google Scholar

Hambleton, R. (2019). The new civic leadership: Place and the co-creation of public innovation. Public Money & Management, 39(4), 271–279.Google Scholar

Handberg, C., Mygind, O., & Johansen, J. S. (2018). Lessons learnt on the meaning of involvement and co-creation in developing community-based rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(25), 3052–3060.Google Scholar

Hardyman, W., Daunt, K. L., & Kitchener, M. (2015). Value co-creation through patient engagement in health care: A micro-level approach and research agenda. Public Management Review, 17(1), 90–107.Google Scholar

Hargadon, A. B. & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17(4), 417–526.Google Scholar

Harkin, D. (2018). Community safety partnerships: The limits and possibilities of policing with the community. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 20(2), 125–136.Google Scholar

Hartley, J. (2006). Innovation and Its Contribution to Improvement: A Review for Policymakers, Policy Advisers, Managers and Researchers. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar

Hartley, J., Alford, J., Hughes, O., & Yates, S. (2015). Public value and political astuteness in the work of public managers: The art of the possible. Public Administration, 93(1), 195–211.Google Scholar

Hartley, J. & Benington, J. (2006). Copy and paste, or graft and transplant? Knowledge sharing through inter-organizational networks. Public Money and Management, 26(2), 101–108.Google Scholar

Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821–830.Google Scholar

Hayes, A. F., Scheufele, D. A., & Huge, M. E. (2006). Nonparticipation as self-censorship: Publicly observable political activity in a polarized opinion climate. Political Behavior, 28(3), 259–283.Google Scholar

Head, B. W. & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration and Society, 47(6), 711–739.Google Scholar

Heclo, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. Public Administration Concepts Cases, 413(413), 46–57.Google Scholar

Heerik, R. A., Hooijdonk, C. M., Burgers, C., & Steen, G. J. (2017). Smoking is sóóó. . .Sandals and white socks: Co-creation of a Dutch anti-smoking campaign to change social norms. Health Communication, 32(5), 621–628.Google Scholar

Heifetz, R., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The Practice of Adaptive Leadership: Tools and Tactics for Changing your Organization and the World. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar

Hendriks, C. M. (2016). Coupling citizens and elites in deliberative systems: The role of institutional design. European Journal of Political Research, 55(1), 43–60.Google Scholar

Henfridsson, O. & Bygstad, B. (2013). The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 907–931.Google Scholar

Hermansson, H. M. L. (2017). Disaster management collaboration in Turkey: Assessing progress and challenges of hybrid network governance. Public Administration, 94(2), 333–349.Google Scholar

Hertting, N. (2007). Mechanisms of governance network formation: A contextual rational choice perspective. In Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J., eds., Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 43–60.Google Scholar

Heying, C. (1997). Civic elites and corporate delocalization: An alternative explanation for declining civic engagement. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 657–668.Google Scholar

Hibbing, J. R. & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs About How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hilgers, D. & Ihl, C. (2010). Citizensourcing: Applying the concept of open innovation to the public sector. International Journal of Public Participation, 4(1), 68–88.Google Scholar

Hines, F. (2005). Viable social enterprise: An evaluation of business support to social enterprises. Social Enterprise Journal, 1(1), 13–28.Google Scholar

Hirst, P. (1994). Associative Democracy: New Forms of Economic and Social Governance. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Hirst, P. (2000). Democracy and governance. In Pierre, J., ed., Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 13–35.Google Scholar

Hjelmar, U., Petersen, O. H., & Vrangbæk, K. (2013). Udlicitering af offentlige opgaver i Danmark-en forskningsoversigt over de hidtil dokumenterede effekter. Politica, 45(1), 60–79.Google Scholar

Hofstad, H. & Torfing, J. (2017). Towards a climate-resilient city: Collaborative innovation for a ‘green shift’ in Oslo. In Fernández, R. Á., Zubelzu, S. & Martínez, R. eds., Carbon Footprint and the Industrial Life Cycle, New York: Springer, 221–242.Google Scholar

Homsy, G. C. & Warner, M. E. (2013). Climate change and the co‐production of knowledge and policy in rural USA communities. Sociologia Ruralis, 53(3), 291–310.Google Scholar

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.Google Scholar

Hood, C. & Dixon, R. (2015). A Government that Worked Better and Costed Less? Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham: Rowman.Google Scholar

Hopkins, M. M., Tidd, J., & Nightingale, P. (2014). Positive and negative dynamics of open innovation. In Tidd, J., ed, Open Innovation Research, Management and Practice. London: Imperial College Press, pp. 417–443.Google Scholar

Horsbøl, A. (2018). Co-creating green transition: How municipality employees negotiate their professional identities as agents of citizen involvement in a cross-local setting. Environmental Communication, 12(5), 701–714.Google Scholar

House, F. (2018). Democracy in Crisis: Freedom in the World 2018. Washington DC: Freedom House.Google Scholar

Howlett, M. (2009). Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 52(2), 153–175.Google Scholar

Huang, W. L. & Feeney, M. K. (2016). Citizen participation in local government decision making: The role of manager motivation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(2), 188–209.Google Scholar

Huxham, C. & Vangen, S. (2013). Managing to Collaborate. The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Huxham, C. & Vangen, S. (2003). Nurturing collaborative relations: Building trust in interorganizational collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(1), 5–31.Google Scholar

Huxham, C. & Vangen, S. (1996a). Working together. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9(7), 5–17.Google Scholar

Huxham, C. & Vangen, S. (1996b). Managing inter-organisational relationships. In Osborne, S. P., ed., Managing in the Voluntary Sector: A Handbook for Managers in Voluntary and Non-Profit Making Organizations. London: International Thompson Business Press, pp. 202–216.Google Scholar

Ibbotson, P. (2008). The Illusion of Leadership: Directing Creativity in Business and the Arts. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar

IDEA (2016). Voter Turnout Database. Retrieved 5/12 2019 at: www.idea.int/data-tools/data/voter-turnout.Google Scholar

Ind, N. & Coates, N. (2013). The meanings of co-creation. European Business Review, 25(1), 86–95.Google Scholar

Ishkanian, A. & Szreter, S. (2012). The Big Society Debate: A New Agenda for Social Policy? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Israilov, S. & Cho, H. J. (2017). How co-creation helped address hierarchy, overwhelmed patients, and conflicts of interest in health care quality and safety. AMA Journal of Ethics, 19(11), 1139–1145.Google Scholar

Iyengar, S. (2016). Editorial foreword: E pluribus pluribus, or divided we stand. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 219–224Google Scholar

Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431.Google Scholar

Jæger, B. & Sørensen, E. (2003). Roller der rykker: Politikere og administratorer mellem hierarki og netværk. Copenhagen: Djøf Publishing.Google Scholar

Jahdi, K. S. & Acikdilli, G. (2009). Marketing communications and corporate social responsibility (CSR): Marriage of convenience or shotgun wedding? Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 103–13.Google Scholar

Janssen, M. & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean government and platform-based governance – Doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), S1–S8.Google Scholar

Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B. ,& Neale, M. A. (1997). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741–763.Google Scholar

Jensen, U. T., Andersen, L. B., Bro, L. L., Bøllingtoft, A., Eriksen, T. L. M., Holten, A. L., … & Westergård-Nielsen, N. (2019). Conceptualizing and measuring transformational and transactional leadership. Administration & Society, 51(1), 3–33.Google Scholar

Jensen, P. H. & Stonecash, R. E. (2005). Incentives and the efficiency of public sector‐outsourcing contracts. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(5), 767–787.Google Scholar

Jessop, B. (2002). The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Jetté, C. & Vaillancourt, Y. (2011). Social economy and home care service in Quebec: Co-production or co-construction?. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organisations, 22(1), 48–69.Google Scholar

Johnson, G., Melin, L., & Whittington, R. (2003). Micro strategy and strategizing: Towards an activity‐based view. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 3–22.Google Scholar

Joshi, A. & Moore, M. (2002). Organisations that Reach the Poor: Why Co-Production Matters. Paper presented at the World Bank Symposium on Making Public Services Work for Poor People, Oxford.Google Scholar

Joshi, A. & Moore, M. H. (2004). Institutionalised co-production: Unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. Journal of Development Studies, 40(4), 31–49.Google Scholar

Kane, J. & Patapan, H. (2012). The Democratic Leader: How Democracy Defines, Empowers, and Limits its Leaders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kania, J. & Kramer, M. (2013). Embracing emergence: How collective impact addresses complexity. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 1–7, January 21, 2013 (website), https://ssir.org/articles/entry/social_progress_through_collective_impactGoogle Scholar

Kania, J. & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1) 36–41.Google Scholar

Katz, R. S. & Mair, P. (1995). Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics, 1(1), 5–28.Google Scholar

Keast, R., Brown, K., & Mandell, M. (2007). Getting the right mix: Unpacking integration meanings and strategies. International Public Management Journal, 10(1), 9–33.Google Scholar

Kemp, R. & Scholl, C. (2016). City labs as vehicles for innovation in urban planning processes. Urban Planning, 1(4), 89–102.Google Scholar

Kench, P. S., Ryan, E. J., Owen, S., Bell, R., Lawrence, J., Glavovic, B., Blackett, P., Becker, J., Schneider, P., Allis, M., Dickson, M., & Rennie, H. G. (2018). Co-creating resilience solutions to coastal hazards through an interdisciplinary research project in New Zealand. Journal of Coastal Research, 85(sp1), 1496–1500.Google Scholar

Khayyat, M. M. (2017). Co-Creation with Open Government Data: A Constructivist Approach Using a Multiple Case Studies Strategy from an Information Systems Perspective. PhD Thesis. The School of Computer Science and Statistics. Trinity College Dublin.Google Scholar

Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (1997). Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar

Kjær, U. & Opstrup, N. (2016). Variationer i udvalgsstyret. Copenhagen: Kommuneforlaget.Google Scholar

Kliemt, H. (1990). The costs of organizing social cooperation. In Hechter, M., Opp, K. D. & Wippler, R., eds., Social Institutions. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 61–80.Google Scholar

Klijn, E. H. & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2014). Accountability and networks. In Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E. & Schillemans, T., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 242–257.Google Scholar

Klok, J. (2013). Participatory design and public space: Catalysts for community. Thesis presented to The University of Guelph. Guelph, Canada.Google Scholar

Kohler, T., Fueller, J., Matzler, K., Stieger, D., & Füller, J. (2011). Co-creation in virtual worlds: The design of the user experience. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 773–788.Google Scholar

Koo, Y. & Ahn, H. (2018). Analysis on the utilization of co-design practices for developing consumer-oriented public service and policy focusing on the comparison with Western countries and South Korea. In ServDes2018. Service Design Proof of Concept, Proceedings of the ServDes. 2018 Conference, 18–20 June, Milan, Italy, 150, Linköping University Electronic Press, 281–297.Google Scholar

Kooiman, J. (1993). Modern Governance: Government-Society Interactions. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Koppenjan, J. & Klijn, E. H. (2004). Managing Uncertainties in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kornberger, M. (2017). The visible hand and the crowd: Analyzing organization design in distributed innovation systems. Strategic Organization, 15(2), 174–193.Google Scholar

Kouzmin, A., Loffler, E., Klages, H., & Korac-Kakabadse, N. (1999). Benchmarking and performance measurement in public sectors towards learning for agency effectiveness. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12(2), 121–144.Google Scholar

Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Laclau, E. & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Laitinen, I., Kinder, T., & Stenvall, J. (2018). Co-design and action learning in local public services. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 24(1), 58–80.Google Scholar

Landemore, H. (2019), Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the 21st Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Landemore, H. (2012). Democratic reason: The mechanisms of collective intelligence in politics. In Landemore, H. & Elster, J., eds., Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 251–289.Google Scholar

Landi, S. & Russo, S. (2019). Co-production as an interpretative framework in the creation of value in public services. Department of Management, Università Ca’Foscari Venezia Working Paper (1).Google Scholar

Larsson, O. S. & Brandsen, T. (2016). The implicit normative assumptions of social innovation research: Embracing the dark side. In Bandsen, T., Cattacin, S., Evers, A. & Zimmer, A., eds., Social Innovations in the Urban Context: Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies. Cham: Springer, pp. 293–302.Google Scholar

Lasker, R. D. & Weiss, E. S. (2003). Broadening participation in community problem solving: A multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research. Journal of Urban Health, 80(1), 14–47.Google Scholar

Layman, G. C. (1999). Culture wars in the American party system: Religious and cultural change among partisan activists since 1972. American Politics Research, 27(1), 89–121.Google Scholar

Layman, G. C., Carsey, T. M., & Horowitz, J. M. (2006). Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 83–110.Google Scholar

Leask, C. F., Sandlund, M., Skelton, D. A., & Chastin, S. F. (2017). Co-creating a tailored public health intervention to reduce older adults’ sedentary behaviour. Health Education Journal, 76(5), 595–608.Google Scholar

Leask, C. F., Sandlund, M., Skelton, D. A., Altenburg, T. M., Cardon, G., Chinapaw, M. J., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Verloigne, M., & Chastin, S. F. M. (2019). Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health intervention. Research Involvement and Engagement, 5(2), 1–16.Google Scholar

Leendertse, W., Langbroek, M., Arts, J., & Nijhuis, A. (2016). Generating spatial quality through co-creation: Experiences from the Blankenburgverbinding (the Netherlands). Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 402–411.Google Scholar

Le Grand, J. (2003). From pawn to queen: An economics perspective. In Oliver, A., ed., Equity in Health and Healthcare: Views from Ethics, Economics and Political Science. Proceedings from a Meeting of the Health Equity Network. London: The Nuffield Trust, pp. 25–32.Google Scholar

Le Grand, J. (2003). Motivation, Agency and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lehmbruch, G. & Schmitter, P. C., eds. (1979). Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Lember, V., Brandsen, T., & Tõnurist, P. (2019). The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation. Public Management Review, 21(11), 1665–1686.Google Scholar

Lente, H., Hekkert, M., Smits, R., & Waveren, B. A. S. (2003). Roles of systemic intermediaries in transition processes. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3), 247–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levine, C. H. & Fisher, G. (1984). Citizenship and service delivery: The promise of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 44, 178–189.Google Scholar

Levitsky, S. & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How Democracies Die. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar

Lewis, M. W. & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 127–149.Google Scholar

Lewis, S., Pea, R., & Rosen, J. (2010). Beyond participation to co-creation of meaning: Mobile social media in generative learning communities. Social Science Information, 49(3), 351–369.Google Scholar

Leyenaar, M. H. & Niemöller, B. (2010). ´European Citizens´ Consultations 2009: Evaluation Report. Brussel: King Baudouin Foundation.Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian & Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lindblom, C. E. (1965). The Intelligence of Democracy: Decision Making Through Mutual Adjustment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Lindgreen, A. & Swaen, V. (2010). Corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Management Review, 12(1), 1–7.Google Scholar

Lipsky, M. (1980). Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar

Loeffler, E. & Bovaird, T. (2018). From participation to co-production: Widening and deepening the contributions of citizens to public services and outcomes. In Ongaro, E. & Thiel, S., eds., The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 403–423.Google Scholar

London, M. & Sessa, V. I. (2007). The development of group interaction patterns: How groups become adaptive, generative, and transformative learners. Human Resource Development Review, 6(4), 353–376.Google Scholar

Long, J. C., Cunningham, F. C., & Braithwaite, J. (2013). Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 13(158), 1–13.Google Scholar

Luke, J. S. (1997). Catalytic Leadership: Strategies for an Interconnected World. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Lund, D. H. (2018). Co-creation in urban governance: From inclusion to innovation. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 22(2), 3–17.Google Scholar

Lutz, C. & Hoffmann, C. P. (2017). The dark side of online participation: Exploring non-, passive and negative participation. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 876–897.Google Scholar

Lykkebo, O. B., Jakobsen, N., & Sauer, P. (2018). Innovationsbarometeret: Nyt sammen bedre: En håndbog om innovative samarbejdr i den offentlige sektor. Copenhagen: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag.Google Scholar

MacPherson, C. B. (1977). The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

MacPherson, C. B. (1978). Property, Mainstream and Critical Positions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Magno, F. & Cassia, F. (2015). Public administrators’ engagement in services co-creation: Factors that foster and hinder organisational learning about citizens. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 26(11–12), 1161–1172.Google Scholar

Maiello, A., Viegas, C. V., Frey, M., & Ribeiro, J. L. D. (2013). Public managers as catalysts of knowledge co-production? Investigating knowledge dynamics in local environmental policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 27, 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the World: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Manin, B. (1987). On legitimacy and political deliberation. Political Theory, 15(3), 338–368.Google Scholar

Mann, T. E. & Ornstein, N. J. (2016). It’s Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, J. J. (1983). Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

March, J. & Olsen, J. P. (1995). Democratic Governance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Marin, B. & Mayntz, R. (1991). Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar

Marschall, M. J. (2004). Citizen participation and the neighborhood context: A new look at the co-production of local public goods. Political Research Quarterly, 57(2), 231–244.Google Scholar

Marsh, D. (2018). Brexit and the politics of truth. British Politics, 13(1), 79–89.Google Scholar

Marsh, D. & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1992). Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Martens, K. (2005). NGO’s and the United Nations: Institutionalization, Professionalization and Adaption. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Maru, Y., Sparrow, A., Stirzaker, R. & Davies, J. (2018). Integrated agricultural research for development (IAR4D) from a theory of change perspective. Agricultural Systems 165: 310–320.Google Scholar

Mayangsari, L. & Novani, S. (2015). Multi-stakeholder co-creation analysis in smart city management: An experience from Bandung, Indonesia. Procedia Manufacturing, 4, 315–321.Google Scholar

Mayena, S. B. (2006). The concepts of resilience revisited. Disasters, 30(4), 434–450.Google Scholar

May, P. J. (2014). Implementation failures revisited: Policy regime perspectives. Public Policy and Administration, 30(3–4), 277–299.Google Scholar

Mayo, E. & Moore, H. (2002). Building the Mutual State: Findings from the Virtual Thinktank. London: New Economic Foundation/Mutuo.Google Scholar

McBride, K., Aavik, G., Kalvet, T., & Krimmer, R. (2018). Co-creating an open government data driven public service: The case of Chicago’s food inspection forecasting model. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/50197Google Scholar

McBride, K., Toots, M., Kalvet, T., & Krimmer, R. (2019). Turning open government data into public value: Testing the COPS framework for the co-creation of OGD-driven public services. In Rodríguez Bolívar, M., Bwalya, K. & Reddick, C., eds., Governance Models for Creating Public Value in Open Data Initiatives. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol. 31. Cham: Springer, pp. 3–31.Google Scholar

McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. (2003). Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14(1), 91–103.Google Scholar

McGill, M. E., Slocum, J. W. Jr, & Lei, D. (1992). Management practices in learning organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 21(1), 5–17.Google Scholar

McMullin, C. & Needham, C. (2018). Co-production in healthcare. In Brandsen, T., Steen, T. & Verschuere, B., eds., Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. New York: Routledge, pp. 151–160.Google Scholar

McMullin, C. (2018). Case study – co-production and community development in France. In Brandsen, T., Verschuere, B. & Steen, T., eds., Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. New York: Routledge, pp. 208–210.Google Scholar

Meerkerk, I. & Edelenbos, J. (2018). Boundary Spanners in Public Management and Governance: An Interdisciplinary Assessment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Meijer, A. (2012). Co-production in an information age: Individual and community engagement supported by new media. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 1156–1172.Google Scholar

Meijer, A. J. (2011). Networked co-production of public services in virtual communities: From a government‐centric to a community approach to public service support. Public Administration Review, 71(4), 598–607.Google Scholar

Meier, K. & Hill, G. (2005). Bureaucracy in the 21st century. In Ferlie, E., Lynn, L. Jr. & Pollitt, C., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 51–71.Google Scholar

Menny, M., Palgan, Y. V., & McCormick, K. (2018). Urban living labs and the role of users in co-creation. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(1), 68–77.Google Scholar

Mergel, I. (2017). Open innovation in the public sector: Drivers and barriers for the adoption of challenge.gov. Public Management Review, 20(5), 726–745.Google Scholar

Merickova, B. M., Nemec, J., & Svidronova, M. (2015). Co-creation in local public services delivery innovation: Slovak experience. Lex Localis, 13(3), 521.Google Scholar

Meuleman, L. (2008). Public Management and the Metagovernance of Hierarchies, Networks and Markets: The Feasibility of Designing and Managing Governance Style Combinations. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar

Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Mikheeva, O. & Tõnurist, P. (2019). Co-creation for the reduction of uncertainty in financial governance: The case of monetary authority of Singapore. Halduskultuur, 19(2), 60–80.Google Scholar

Miller, C. A. & Wyborn, C. (2018). Co-production in global sustainability: Histories and theories. Environmental Science & Policy, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.016Google Scholar

Mintrom, M. & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667.Google Scholar

Mintzberg, H. (1994). The fall and rise of strategic planning. Harvard Business Review, 72(1), 107–114.Google Scholar

Mintzberg, H. (1973). Strategy making in three modes. California Management Review, 16(2), 44–53.Google Scholar

Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., Lampel, J. B., & Koch, R. (2009). Strategy Safari: The Complete Guide Through the Wilds of Strategic Management. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Mitlin, D. (2008). With and beyond the state: Co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment & Urbanization, 20(2): 339–360.Google Scholar

Moe, T. M. (1984). The new economics of organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28(4), 739–777.Google Scholar

Mogstad, A., Høiseth, M., & Pettersen, I. N. (2018). Co-creation in public service innovation: A review of how to encourage employee engagement in co-creation. DS 91: Proceedings of NordDesign 2018, Linköping, Sweden, August 14–17, 2018. www.designsociety.org/publication/40907/Co-creation+in+Public+Service+Innovation%3A+A+review+of+how+to+encourage+employee+engagement+in+co-creationGoogle Scholar

Molen, F., Puente-Rodríguez, D., Swart, J. A., & Windt, H. J. (2015). The co-production of knowledge and policy in coastal governance: Integrating mussel fisheries and nature restoration. Ocean & Coastal Management, 106, 49–60.Google Scholar

Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Moore, M. H. (2000). Managing for value: Organizational strategy in for-profit, non-profit, and governmental organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 183–204.Google Scholar

Morales, L. & Giugni, M. (eds.). (2016). Social Capital, Political Participation and Migration in Europe: Making Multicultural Democracy Work? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Morgan, D. & Cook, B. (2014). New Public Governance: A Regime-Centered Perspective. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Morris, P., O’Neill, F., Armitage, A., Lane, R., Symons, J., Dalton, E., Gaines, M., Katz, A., & Reed, J. (2007). Moving from tokenism to co-production: Implications of learning from patient and community voices in developing patient centred professionalism. Conference paper presented at Professional Lifelong Learning: Critical Debates about Professionalism Conference. University of Leeds. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/48170935/Moving_from_tokenism_to_co-production_im20160819-19998-obgwzp.pdf?1471601982=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DMoving_from_tokenism_to_co_production_im.pdf&Expires=1599677177&Signature=G4xEe66Vx6uGm5-2KNhtbXn7arE423WF5N04ya6oB5SYfGNpZkaC~vKna8rkbIzU8bMTwhSphQWE7mZhR39Bo7aaWQ9LxQWPUZGVyAQXkBKwrileATDbJsoBHCoS86w~wFRC8l-rwxSBLGu-FF-XUQPGNd00YAfjTSTeySqdo6WtfKJIrdsIxHEC2p-sRAYQNlHeOrhnqO097fR4yRCYOaSfyRvAc6flxYOo2bYGHhZ-S~Y6lYZb3BUGfRAlyUOgv6CDkWPEDVJ1-4dhyOzXqiFnq3A66ccp5jmCOmc4p5zh6YqkANFDaYPCIdFdtA9zSZvfZVBWLj31XxKCl~xAbg__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZAGoogle Scholar

Morse, R. S. (2010). Integrative public leadership: Catalyzing collaboration to create public value. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 231–245.Google Scholar

Mosquera, J. (2018). The power of co-creation in redesigning Valencia’s waterfront. Community, Culture, Economy, Cooperative City. https://cooperativecity.orgGoogle Scholar

Moss, T., Medd, W., Guy, S., & Marvin, S. (2009). Organising water: The hidden role of intermediary work. Water Alternatives, 2(1), 16–33.Google Scholar

Mouffe, C. (2005). On the Political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mouffe, C. (2000). The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Mouffe, C. (1993). The Return of the Political. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Mouritzen, P. E. & Svara, J. H. (2002). Leadership at the Apex: Politicians and Administrators in Western Local Governments. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Moynihan, D. P. (2003). Normative and instrumental perspectives on public participation: Citizen summits in Washington D.C. The American Review of Public Administration, 33(2), 164–188.Google Scholar

Mudde, C. & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mudde, C. (2006). Europe’s populist surge: A long time in the making. Foreign Affairs, 95(6), 25–30.Google Scholar

Mulder, I. (2012). Living labbing the Rotterdam way: Co-creation as an enabler for urban innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9), 39–43.Google Scholar

Munck, R. (1993). After the transition: Democratic disenchantment in Latin America. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 55, 7–19.Google Scholar

Munoz, S., Steiner, A., & Farmer, J. (2014). Processes of community-led social enterprise development: Learning from the rural context. Community Development Journal, 50(3), 478–493.Google Scholar

Nabatchi, T. & Leighninger, M. (2015). Public Participation for 21st Century Democracy. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar