Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:25:31.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Locke and multiculturalism: toleration, relativism, and reason

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Susan Khin Zaw
Affiliation:
Open University
Robert K. Fullinwider
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access

Summary

I do not believe that a private education can work the wonders which some sanguine writers have attributed to it. Men and women must be educated, in a great degree, by the opinions and manners of the society they live in. … It may then fairly be inferred, that, till society be differently constituted, much cannot be expected from education.

[T]he most perfect education, in my opinion, is such an exercise of the understanding as is best calculated to strengthen the body and form the heart.

Mary Wollstonecraft

I want to preface this essay with an explanation of why I have produced, for a volume on multicultural education, an essay which appears to say almost nothing about it. One reason is that I am uncertain of the usefulness of offering, from the security of the academy, theoretical criticisms of educational programs designed for much more desperate conditions than I am familiar with; I'm reluctant to comment on what's proposed for Los Angeles or Liverpool because I don't know what it's like out there. But there is also a deeper reason, given in the first of the two quotations from Mary WoUstonecraft which head this chapter. WoUstonecraft reminds us of something which it is easy to forget. Multicultural education provokes passionate debate about educational values which are felt to be deeply important (and so they are). This confers importance also on the debate about them, where theoretical issues arise (for instance about the universality of specific values) with which philosophers are likely to feel at home.

Type
Chapter
Information
Public Education in a Multicultural Society
Policy, Theory, Critique
, pp. 121 - 155
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×