Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:32:31.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - Measurement of Wisdom

from Part I - Introduction to Wisdom Theory and Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

By
Judith Glück
Edited by
Robert J. Sternberg  and
Judith Glück
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Judith Glück
Affiliation:
Universität Klagenfurt, Austria
Get access

Summary

This chapter outlines two basic ways to measure wisdom. Self-report measures are quick and easy to administer. Their main disadvantage is that they assess people’s own views of their own wisdom, which may or may not be an accurate representation of their actual wisdom. In fact, highly wise individuals may view themselves as less wise than highly self-confident but not-quite-as-wise individuals! Self-report measures are more useful for assessing attitudes or feelings than for assessing competencies and abilities. Open-ended, problem-based measures of wisdom do not require people to judge themselves. They directly show how wisely participants think about difficult problems. Obviously, the effort and time required to administer, transcribe, and code open-ended wisdom measures is much higher than for self-report measures. Also, when we present people with fictitious problems of fictitious people, emotional involvement will be low and their responses will represent theoretical wisdom that they might not be able to access in a stressful situation. If we interview them about problems from their own life, however, different people may end up talking about very different problems. Currently, researchers are working on measures that involve participants emotionally but remain somewhat standardized with respect to content.

Keywords

wisdomself-report measuresproblem-based measuresopen-endedsocial
Type
Chapter
Information
The Psychology of Wisdom
An Introduction
 , pp. 89 - 104
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldwin, C. M. (2009). Gender and wisdom: a brief overview. Research in Human Development, 6(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
Ardelt, M. (2003). Empirical assessment of a three-dimensional wisdom scale. Research on Aging, 25(3), 275–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardelt, M. (2011). The measurement of wisdom: a commentary on Taylor, Bates, and Webster's comparison of the SAWS and 3D-WS. Experimental Aging Research, 37(2), 241–55.Google Scholar
Ardelt, M., Pridgen, S., and Nutter-Pridgen, K. L. (2018). The relation between age and three-dimensional wisdom: variations by wisdom dimensions and education. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 73(8), 1339–49.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B. and Smith, J. (1990). Toward a psychology of wisdom and its ontogenesis. In Sternberg, R. J., ed., Wisdom: Its Nature, Origins, and Development. Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–120.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B. and Staudinger, U. M. (2000). Wisdom: a metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 122–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brienza, J. P., Kung, F. Y. H., Santos, H. C., Bobocel, D. R., and Grossmann, I. (2018). Wisdom, bias, and balance: toward a process-sensitive measurement of wisdom-related cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(6), 1093–126.Google Scholar
Glück, J. (2016). Weisheit – Die 5 Prinzipien des gelingenden Lebens. [Wisdom – The Five Principles of the Good Life.] Kösel.Google Scholar
Glück, J. (2018). Measuring wisdom: existing approaches, continuing challenges, and new developments. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences, 73(8), 1393–403.Google Scholar
Glück, J. and Bluck, S. (2013). The MORE Life Experience Model: a theory of the development of personal wisdom. In Ferrari, M. and Weststrate, N. M., eds., The Scientific Study of Personal Wisdom. Springer, pp. 75–97.Google Scholar
Glück, J., König, S., Naschenweng, K. et al. (2013). How to measure wisdom: content, reliability, and validity of five measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glück, J., Bluck, S., and Weststrate, N. M. (2019). More on the MORE Life Experience Model: what we have learned (so far). The Journal of Value Inquiry, 53(3), 349–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossmann, I., Na, J., Varnum, M. E. W. et al. (2010). Reasoning about social conflicts improves into old age. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(16), 7246–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Hu, C. S., Ferrari, M., Wang, Q., and Woodruff, E. (2017). Thin-slice measurement of wisdom. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koller, I., Levenson, M. R., and Glück, J. (2017). What do you think you are measuring? A mixed-methods procedure for assessing the content validity of test items and theory-based scaling. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunzmann, U. (2019). Performance-based measures of wisdom: state of the art and future directions. In Sternberg, R. J. and Glück, J., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Wisdom. Cambridge University Press, pp. 277–96.Google Scholar
Le, T. N. and Levenson, M. R. (2005). Wisdom as self-transcendence: what’s love (and individualism) got to do with it? Journal of Research in Personality, 39(4), 443–57.Google Scholar
Levenson, M. R., Jennings, P. A., Aldwin, C. M., and Shiraishi, R. W. (2005). Self-transcendence: conceptualization and measurement. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 60(2), 127–43.Google Scholar
Pasupathi, M., Staudinger, U. M., and Baltes, M. M. (2001). Seeds of wisdom: adolescents’ knowledge and judgement about difficult life problems. Developmental Psychology, 37(3), 351–61.Google Scholar
Redzanowski, U. and Glück, J. (2013). Who knows who is wise? Self and peer ratings of wisdom. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(3), 391–94.Google Scholar
Staudinger, U. M. (1999). Older and wiser? Integrating results on the relationship between age and wisdom-related performance. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23(3), 641–64.Google Scholar
Staudinger, U. M. (2019). The distinction between personal and general wisdom: how far have we come? In Sternberg, R. J. and Glück, J., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Wisdom. Cambridge University Press, pp. 182–201.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. and Glück, J. (2022). Wisdom: The Psychology of Wise Thoughts, Words, and Deeds. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, M., Bates, G., and Webster, J. D. (2011). Comparing the psychometric properties of two measures of wisdom: predicting forgiveness and psychological well-being with the Self-Assessed Wisdom Scale (SAWS) and the Three-Dimensional Wisdom Scale (3D-WS). Experimental Aging Research, 37(2), 129–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, S. and Kunzmann, U. (2014). Age differences in wisdom-related knowledge: does the age relevance of the task matter? The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(6), 897–905.Google Scholar
Webster, J. D. (2003). An exploratory analysis of a self-assessed wisdom scale. Journal of Adult Development, 10(1), 13–22.Google Scholar
Webster, J. D. (2007). Measuring the character strength of wisdom. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 65(2), 163–83.Google Scholar
Webster, J. D. (2010). Wisdom and positive psychosocial values in young adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 17(2), 70–80.Google Scholar
Webster, J. D. (2019). Self-report wisdom measures: strengths, limitations, and future directions. In Sternberg, R. J. and Glück, J., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Wisdom. Cambridge University Press, pp. 297–320,Google Scholar
Webster, J. D., Westerhof, G. J., and Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2014). Wisdom and mental health across the lifespan. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(2), 209–18.Google Scholar
Webster, J. D., Weststrate, N. M., Ferrari, M., Munroe, M., and Pierce, T. W. (2018). Wisdom and meaning in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 6(2), 118–36.Google Scholar
Weststrate, N. M. and Glück, J. (2017). Hard-earned wisdom: exploratory processing of difficult life experience is positively associated with wisdom. Developmental Psychology, 53(4), 800–14.Google Scholar
Zacher, H., McKenna, B., Rooney, D., and Gold, S. (2015). Wisdom in the military context. Military Psychology, 27(3), 142–54.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×