Abbey, A., Saenz, C. and Buck, P. O. (2005). The cumulative effects of acute alcohol consumption, individual differences and situational perceptions on sexual decision making. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 66, 82–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Abele, A. and Hermer, P. (1993). Mood influences on health-related judgments: appraisal of own health versus appraisal of unhealthy behaviors. European Review of Social Psychology, 23, 613–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abelson, R. P. and Levi, A. (1985). Decision-making and decision theory. In Lindzey, G. and Aronson, E. Jason (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 231–309). New York: Random House, 19th edition.Google Scholar

Abrams, D., Wetherell, M. S., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A. and Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: self-categorisation and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abric, J. C. (1994). Les Représentations sociales: aspectes théoretiques. In Abric, J. C. (ed.), Pratiques Sociales et Représentations (pp. 11–35). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Agha, S. (2003). The impact of mass media campaign on personal risk perception, perceived self-efficacy and on other behavioural predictors. AIDS Care, 15, 749–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ahern, J., Galea, S., Resnick, H. and Vlahov, D. (2004). Television images and probable post-traumatic stress disorder after Sept 11: the role of background characteristics, event exposure and perievent panic. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 192, 3, 217–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alhakami, A. S. and Slovic, P. (1994). A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Analysis, 14, 1085–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alicke, M. D., Klotz, M. L., Breithenbecher, D. L., Yurack, T. J. and Vredenburg, D. S. (1995). Personal contact, individualisation and the better than average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 804–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, P. T. (1998). Public participation in resolving environmental disputes and the problem of representativeness. Risk: Health, Safety & Environment, 9, 297–308.Google Scholar

Andersen, C. F. et al. (2007). The New Orleans Hurricane Protection System: What Went Wrong and Why (PDF). American Society of Civil Engineers Hurricane Katrina External Review Panel. .

Anderson, C. and Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansell, J. (1992). Reliability, industrial risk assessment. In Ansell, J. and Wharton, F. (eds.), Risk: Analysis, Assessment and Management. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Appleton-Knapp, S. L. (2003). Memory dynamics in hindsight biases. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section B, The Sciences and Engineering, 63 (7-B), 3488.Google Scholar

Ardelt, M. (2000). Still suitable after all these years? Personality stability theory revisited. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 392–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arden, P. (1993). Create a corporate safety culture. Safety & Health, 60–3.Google Scholar

Arkes, H. R. (1991). Costs and benefits of judgment errors: implications for debiasing. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 486–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arkes, H. R., Faust, D., Guilmette, T., , J. and Hart, K. (1988). Eliminating hindsight bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 2, 305–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arkes, H. R., Saville, P. D. and Harkness, A. R. (1981). Hindsight bias among physicians weighing the likelihood of diagnoses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 252–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. AIP Journal, 35, 4, 216–24.Google Scholar

Aronson, E. (1997). Bring the family. APS Observer, July/August, 17.Google Scholar

Atman, C. J., Bostrom, A., Fischhoff, B. and Morgan, M. G. (1994). Designing risk communications: completing and correcting mental models of hazards processes, part I. Risk Analysis, 14, 779–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aven, T. (2011). On different types of uncertainties in the context of the precautionary principle. Risk Analysis, 31, 1515–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aven, T. (2013). On how to deal with deep uncertainties in a risk assessment and management context. Risk Analysis, 33, 2082–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, A. B., Buunk, B. P. and Manstead, A. S. (1997). The moderating role of self-efficacy beliefs in the relationship between anticipated feelings of regret and condom use. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 2001–14.Google Scholar

Balzano, Q. and Sheppard, A. R. (2002). The influence of the precautionary principle on science-based decision-making: questionable applications to risks of radiofrequency fields. Journal of Risk Research, 5, 351–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar

Barke, R. and Jenkins-Smith, H. (1993). Politics and scientific expertise: scientists, risk perception, and nuclear waste policy. Risk Analysis, 13, 425–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barlow, D. H., Rapee, R. M. and Brown, T. A. (1992). Behavioural treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. Behaviour Therapy, 20, 261–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, J. and Breakwell, G. M. (2001). Risk perception and experience: hazard personality profiles and individual differences. Risk Analysis, 21, 171–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barnett, J. and Breakwell, G. M. (2003). The social amplification of risk and the hazard sequence: the October 1995 oral contraceptive pill scare. Health, Risk & Society, 5, 301–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baron, J., Hershey, J. C. and Kunreuther, H. (2000). Determinants of priority for risk reduction: the role of worry. Risk Analysis, 20, 413–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barratt, E. O., Cabal, L. F. and Moeller, F. G. (2004). Impulsitivity and sensation seeking: a historical perspective on current challenges. In Stelmack, R. M. (ed.), On the Psychobiology of Personality: Essays in Honor of Marvin Zuckerman (pp. 3–15). New York: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartholomew, R. E. and Wessely, S. (2002). Protean nature of mass sociogenic illness: from possessed nuns to chemical and biological terrorism fears. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 300–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Basili, M. and Franzini, M. (2006). Understanding the risk of an avian flu pandemic: rational waiting or precautionary failure?Risk Analysis, 26, 617–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bateman, I. J., Langford, I. H., Turner, R. K., Willis, K. G. and Garrod, G. D. (1995). Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies. Ecological Economics, 12, 161–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bea, R. G. (2002). Human and organizational factors in reliability assessment and management of offshore structures. Risk Analysis, 22, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beard, M. (2011). Risk and the humanities: Alea iacta est. In Skinns, L., Scott, M. and Cox, T. (eds.), Risk (pp. 85–108). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Beck, U. (2006). Living in the world risk society. Economy and Society, 35, 329–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Begum, H. A. and Ahmed, E. (1986). Individual risk-taking and risky shift as a function of cooperation–competition proneness of subjects. Psychological Studies, 31, 1, 21–5.Google Scholar

Beierle, T. C. (2004). The benefits and costs of disclosing information about risks: what do we know about right-to-know?Risk Analysis, 24, 335–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benthin, A., Slovic, P. and Severson, H. (1993). A psychometric study of adolescent risk perception. Journal of Adolescence, 16, 153–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bergstrom, R. L. and McCaul, K. D. (2004). Perceived risk and worry: the effects of 9/11 on willingness to fly. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1846–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berman, J., Brabazon, P., Bellamy, L. and Huddleston, J. (1994). The Regulator as a Determinant of the Safety Culture. London: HSE Report.Google Scholar

Bernoulli, D. (1954). A new theory on the measurement of risk, trans. Sommer, L.. Econometrica, 22, 36. Original work published 1738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernstein, N. R. (1990). Fire. In Coddington, R. and Noshpitz, J. D. (eds.), Stressors and the Adjustment Disorders (pp. 260–77). Oxford: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Binder, A. R., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D. and Gunther, A. C. (2011). Interpersonal amplification of risk? Citizen discussions and their impact on perceptions of risks and benefits of a biological research facility. Risk Analysis, 31: 324–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blank, H., Musch, J. and Pohl, R. F. (2007). Hindsight bias: on being wise after the event. Social Cognition, 25, 1, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blank, H. and Nestler, S. (2007). Cognitive process models of hindsight bias. Social Cognition, 25, 1, 132–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blume, S. (2006). Anti-vaccination movements and their interpretations. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 628–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boholm, A. (1996). Risk perception and social anthropology: critique of cultural theory. Ethnos, 61, 64–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boholm, A. (2009). Risk and causality in newspaper reporting. Risk Analysis, 29, 1566–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bonaiuto, M., Breakwell, G. M. and Cano, I. (1996). Identity processes and environmental threat: the effects of nationalism and local identity upon perception of beach pollution. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 6, 157–75.3.0.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boney-McCoy, S., Gibbons, F. X., Reis, T. J., Gerrard, M., Luus, C. A. E. and Sufka, A. V. W. (1992). Perceptions of smoking risk as a function of smoking status. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 469–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bord, R. J. and O’Connor, R. E. (1990). Risk communication, knowledge, and attitudes: explaining reactions to a technology perceived as risky. Risk Analysis, 10, 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bord, R. J. and O’Connor, R. E. (1997). The gender gap in environmental attitudes. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 4, 830–40.Google Scholar

Boscarino, J. A., Adams, R. E. and Figley, C. R. (2004). Mental health service use 1 year after the World Trade Center disaster: implications for mental health care. General Hospital Psychiatry, 26, 346–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bostrom, A., Atman, C., Fischhoff, B. and Morgan, M. (1994a). Evaluating risk communications: completing and correcting mental models of hazardous processes, Part 2. Risk Analysis, 14, 789–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bostrom, A., Fischhoff, B. and Morgan, M. G. (1992). Characterizing mental models of hazardous processes: a methodology and an application to radon. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B. and Read, D. (1994b). What do people know about global climate-change? 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis, 14, 959–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouyer, M., Bagdassarian, S., Chaabanne, S. and Mullet, E. (2001). Personality correlates of risk perception. Risk Analysis, 21, 457–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bradfield, A. and Wells, G. L. (2005). Not the same old hindsight bias: outcome information distorts a broad range of retrospective judgments. Memory and Cognition, 33, 120–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brauer, M., Judd, C. M. and Gliner, M. D. (1995). The effects of repeated expressions on attitude polarization during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1014–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breakwell, G. M. (1986). Coping with Threatened Identities. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Breakwell, G. M. (1993). Integrating paradigms, methodological implications. In Breakwell, G. M. and Canter, D. V. (eds.), Empirical Approaches to Social Representations (pp. 180–201). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Breakwell, G. M. (1994). The echo of power: a framework for social psychological research. The Psychologist, 17, 65–72.Google Scholar

Breakwell, G. M. (1996). Risk estimation and sexual behaviour: a longitudinal study of 16–21 year olds. Journal of Health Psychology, 1, 79–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Breakwell, G. M. (2000). Risk communication: factors affecting impact. British Medical Bulletin, 56, 1, 110–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Breakwell, G. M. (2001a). Mental models and social representations of hazards: the significance of identity processes. Journal of Risk Research, 4, 341–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breakwell, G. M. (2001b). What makes innovation acceptable? In Toutant, J. P. and Balazc, I. (eds.), Molecular Farming (pp. 279–88). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Breakwell, G. M. (2014a). Identity process theory: clarifications and elaborations. In Jaspal, R. and Breakwell, G. M. (eds.), Identity Process Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Breakwell, G. M. (2014b). Identity and social representations. In Jaspal, R. and Breakwell, G. M. (eds.), Identity Process Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Breakwell, G. M. (2014c). Epilogue. In Jaspal, R. and Breakwell, G. M. (eds.), Identity Process Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Breakwell, G. M. (2014d). Identity process theory. In Sammut, G., Daanen, P., Sartawi, M. and Gaskell, G. (eds.), Resistance, Stability and Social Change: A Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Breakwell, G. M. (2014e). Risk: social psychological perspectives. In Wright, J. D. (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioural Sciences. New York: Elsevier, 2nd edition.Google Scholar

Breakwell, G. M. and Barnett, J. (2000). Social influence processes and their effect on risk amplification. In Cottam, M. P., Harvey, D. W., Pape, R. P. and Tait, J. (eds.), Foresight and Precaution (pp. 1181–7). Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema.Google Scholar

Breakwell, G. M. and Barnett, J. (2001). The Impact of Social Amplification on Risk Communication. Contract Research Report 322/2001. Sudbury: HSE Books.Google Scholar

Breakwell, G. M. and Barnett, J. (2003a). The significance of uncertainty and conflict: developing a social psychological theory of risk communication. New Review of Social Psychology, 2, 107–14.Google Scholar

Breakwell, G. M. and Barnett, J. (2003b). Social amplification of risk and the layering method. In Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R. and Slovic, P. (eds.), The Social Amplification of Risk (pp. 80–101). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breakwell, G. M., Millward, L. and Fife-Schaw, C. R. (1994). Commitment to ‘safer’ sex as a predictor of condom use amongst 16–20 year olds. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breakwell, G. M. and Petts, J. (2000). Stakeholder Participation Methods – Scoping Study. Report to the HSE. RSU Ref 4072/R64.063.

Breakwell, G. M. and Rowett, C. (1982). Social Work: The Social Psychological Approach. Wokingham: Van Nostrand Reinhold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenkert-Smith, H., Dickinson, K. L., Champ, P. A. and Flores, N. (2013). Social amplification of wildfire risk: the role of social interactions and information sources. Risk Analysis, 33, 800–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brenot, J. and Bonnefous, S. (1995). Approche socio-culturelle de la perception des risques. Fontenay-aux-Roses, France: Institut de Protection et de Sûreté Nucléaire.Google Scholar

Brockner, J., Wiesenfeld, B. M. and Martin, C. L. (1995). Decision frame, procedural justice, and survivors’ reactions to job layoffs. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Process, 63, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brody, C. J. (1984). Differences by sex in support for nuclear power. Social Issues, 63, 209–28.Google Scholar

Broers, A. N. (2005). The nuclear energy option – will we still need it – and if so – when?Science in Parliament, 62, 16–17.Google Scholar

Bromiley, P. and Curley, S. P. (1992). Individual differences in risk taking. In Yates, J. F. (ed.), Risk-Taking Behaviour (pp. 87–132). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Bronfman, N. C. and Cifuentes, L. A. (2003). Risk perception in a developing country: the case of Chile. Risk Analysis, 23, 1271–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brosius, H. B. and Weimann, G. (1996). Who sets the agenda? Agenda-setting as a two-step flow. Communication Research, 23, 561–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brouwer, R., Akter, S., Brander, L. and Haque, E. (2007). Socioeconomic vulnerability and adaptation to environmental risk: a case study of climate change and flooding in Bangladesh. Risk Analysis, 27: 313–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brown, J. M., Henderson, J. and Armstrong, M. P. (1987). Children’s perceptions of nuclear power stations as revealed through their drawings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 7, 189–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brun, W. (1992). Cognitive components in risk perception: natural versus manmade risks. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 5, 117–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bryant, F. B. and Guilbault, R. L. (2002). ‘I knew it all along’ eventually: the development of hindsight bias in reaction to the Clinton impeachment verdict. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bull, R. and Carson, D. (eds.) (2001). Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts. Chichester: John Wiley.

Burger, J. M. and Burns, L. (1988). The illusion of unique invulnerability and the use of effective contraception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 264–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgess, A. (2012). Media, risk, and absence of blame for ‘acts of God’: attenuation of the European volcanic ash cloud of 2010. Risk Analysis, 32, 1693–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burns, C., Mearns, K. and McGeorge, P. (2006). Explicit and implicit trust within safety culture. Risk Analysis, 26, 1139–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burns, W. J., Peters, E. and Slovic, P. (2012). Risk perception and the economic crisis: a longitudinal study of the trajectory of perceived risk. Risk Analysis, 32, 659–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burns, W. J., Slovic, P. and Kasperson, R. E. (1993). Incorporating structural models into research on the social amplification of risk: implication for theory construction and decision making. Risk Analysis, 13, 611–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burnstein, E. and Vinokur, A. (1977). Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 315–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, R. S. (1999). The social capital of opinion leaders. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buunk, B. P., Bakker, A. B., Siero, F. W., Eijinden, R. J. and Yzer, M. C. (1998). Predictors of AIDS-preventive behavioural intentions among adult heterosexuals at risk for HIV-infection: extending current models and measures. AIDS Education and Prevention, 10, 149–72.Google ScholarPubMed

Caffray, C. M. and Schneider, S. L. (2000). Why do they do it? Affective motivators in adolescents’ decisions to participate in risk behaviours. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 4, 543–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callaghan, P., Moloney, G. and Blair, D. (2012). Contagion in the representational field of water recycling: informing new environment practice through social representation theory. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22, 20–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calman, K. C. (2002). Communication of risk: choice, consent and trust. Lancet, 360, 166–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campbell, J. D. and Tesser, A. (1983). Motivational interpretations of hindsight bias: an individual difference analysis. Journal of Personality, 51, 605–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, L. F. and Stewart, A. E. (1992). Effects of group membership on perception of risk for AIDS. Psychological Reports, 70, 1075–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canelon, M. L. and Rovira, D. P. (2002). Representaciones sociales de la enfermedad de Chagas en comunidades en riesgo: creencias, actitudes y prevención [Social representation of Chagas disease in at-risk communities: beliefs, attitudes and prevention]. Revista Interamericana de Psicologia, 36, 215–36.Google Scholar

Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E. and Converse, S. A. (1990). Cognitive psychology and team training: training shared mental models of complex systems. Human Factors Bulletin, 33, 1–4.Google Scholar

Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E. and Converse, S. A. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision-making. In Castellan, N. J. (ed.), Individual and Group Decision Making: Current Issues. New Jersey: LEA.Google Scholar

Cantor, N. and Mischel, W. (1977). Traits as prototypes: effects on recognition memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 38–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caponecchia, C. (2012). Relative risk perception for terrorism: implications for preparedness and risk communication. Risk Analysis, 32, 1524–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carnes, S. A., Schweitzer, M., Peelle, E. B., Wolfe, A. K. and Munro, J. F. (1998). Measuring the success of public participation on environmental restoration and waste management activities in the US Department of Energy. Technology in Society, 20, 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carney, R. E. (1971). Attitudes towards risk. In Carney, R. E. (ed.), Risk Taking Behaviour: Concepts, Methods, and Applications to Smoking and Drug Abuse (pp. 1–27). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar

Carson, L. (1999). In a sneak preview of the referendum, your average Australian voted yes. University of Sydney News, 6.Google Scholar

Carter, D. A. (1991). Aspects of risk assessment for hazardous pipeline containing flammable substances. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 4, 68–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carvalho, A. and Burgess, J. (2005). Cultural circuits of climate change in UK broadsheet newspapers. Risk Analysis, 25, 1457–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casman, E. A. and Fischhoff, B. (2008). Risk communication planning for the aftermath of a plague bioattack. Risk Analysis, 28, 1327–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Castellan, N. J. (1993). Individual and Group Decision Making: Current Issues. New Jersey: LEA.Google Scholar

Castro, P. and Gomes, I. (2005). Genetically modified organisms in the Portuguese press: thematization and anchoring. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, G. B. and Coups, E. J. (2006). Emotion and preventative health behaviour: worry, regret, and influenza vaccination. Health Psychology, 25, 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, G. B. and Johnson, E. J. (1999). Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chauvin, B., Hermand, D. and Mullet, E. (2007). Risk perception and personality facets. Risk Analysis, 27, 171–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cherpitel, C. J. (1993). Alcohol, injury and risk-taking behaviour: data from a national sample. Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, 17, 762–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chess, C. and Purcell, K. (1999). Public participation and the environment: do we know what works?Environmental Science & Technology, 33, 2685–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chung, I. J. (2011). Social amplification of risk in the Internet environment. Risk Analysis, 31, 1883–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, M. C. and Payne, R. L. (2006). Character-based determinants of trust in leaders. Risk Analysis, 26, 1161–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clarke, S. and Ward, K. (2006). The role of leader influence tactics and safety climate in engaging employees’ safety participation. Risk Analysis, 26, 1175–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cliff, S. M., Wilkins, J. C. and Davidson, E. A. F. (1993). Impulsiveness, venture-someness and sexual risk-taking among heterosexual GUM clinic attenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 403–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coles, R. and Hodgkinson, G. P. (2008). A psychometric study of information technology risks in the workplace. Risk Analysis, 28, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Colyvan, M. (2008). Is probability the only coherent approach to uncertainty?Risk Analysis, 28, 645–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cooke, R. (2010). Conundrums with uncertainty factors. Risk Analysis, 30, 330–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Costa, P. T. and McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Costa-Font, J., Rudisill, C. and Mossialos, E. (2008). Attitudes as an expression of knowledge and ‘political anchoring’: the case of nuclear power in the United Kingdom. Risk Analysis, 28, 1273–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cotgrove, S. (1982). Catastrophe or Cornucopia: The Environment, Politics and the Future. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Cowley, S. and Billings, J. R. (1999). Identifying approaches to meet assessed needs in health visiting. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 8, 527–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cox, L. A. (2008). Some limitations of ‘risk = threat × vulnerability × consequence’ for risk analysis of terrorist attacks. Risk Analysis, 28, 1749–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, L. A. and Popken, D. A. (2008). Overcoming confirmation bias in causal attribution: a case study of antibiotic resistance risks. Risk Analysis, 28, 1155–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cox, P., Fischhoff, B., Gerrard, S., Niewöhner, J., Pidgeon, N. and Riley, D. (2001). Developing a Methodology for Designing Messages about Chemical Risks in the Workplace Using the Mental Models Approach. Report to the Health and Safety Executive.

Cox, S. and Cox, T. (1991). The structure of employee attitudes to safety: a European example. Work & Stress, 5, 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, S., Jones, B. and Collinson, D. (2006). Trust relations in high-reliability organizations. Risk Analysis, 26, 1123–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coyle, I., Sleeman, S. and Adams, D. (1995). Safety climate. Journal of Safety Research, 22, 247–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crane, S. F. and Carswell, J. W. (1992). A review and assessment of nongovernmental organization-based STD/AIDS education and prevention projects for marginalized groups. Health Education Research, 7, 175–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crisp, B. R. and Barber, J. G. (1995). The effect of locus of control on the association between risk perception and sexual risk-taking. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 841–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crossland, B., Bennett, P. A., Ellis, A. F., Farmer, F. R., Gittus, J., Godfrey, P. S. et al. (1992). Estimating Engineering Risk. London: Royal Society.Google Scholar

Cvetkovich, G. (1999). The attribution of social trust. In Cvetkovich, G. and Löfstedt, R. E. (eds.), Social Trust and the Management of Risk (pp. 53–61). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Cvetkovich, G. and Earle, T. C. (eds.) (1991). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, special issue: Risk and Culture, 22, 11–149.

Cvetkovich, G. and Löfstedt, R. E. (eds.) (1999). Social Trust and the Management of Risk. London: Earthscan.

Cvetkovich, G., Siegrist, M., Murray, R. and Tragesser, S. (2002). New information and social trust: asymmetry and perseverance of attributions about hazard managers. Risk Analysis, 22, 359–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dahlstrom, M. F., Dudo, A. and Brossard, D. (2012). Precision of information, sensational information, and self-efficacy information as message-level variables affecting risk perceptions. Risk Analysis, 32, 155–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Daily Telegraph (2011). Obama oil spill commission’s final report blames disaster on cost-cutting by BP and partners. The Daily Telegraph, 5 January.

Dake, K. (1991). Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk: an analysis of contemporary worldviews and cultural biases. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 22, 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dake, K. and Wildavsky, A. (1991). Individual differences in risk perception and risk-taking preferences. In Garrick, B. J. and Gekler, W. C. (eds.), The Analysis, Communication and Perception of Risk (pp. 98–117). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Das, E., de-Wit, J. and Stroebe, W. (2003). Fear appeals motivate acceptance of action recommendations: evidence for a positive bias in the processing of persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 650–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davidson, D. J. and Frendenburg, W. R. (1996). Gender and environment risk concerns: a review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behaviour, 28, 3, 302–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, M. F. (1993). Field dependence and hindsight bias: output interference in the generation of reasons. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 222–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, M. A. and Bobko, P. (1986). Contextual effects on escalation processes in public sector decision-making. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 37, 121–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawson, I. G. J., Johnson, J. E. V. and Luke, M. A. (2012). Do people believe combined hazards can present synergistic risks?Risk Analysis, 32, 801–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

de Bruin, W. B., Güvenç, Ü., Fischhoff, B., Armstrong, C. M. and Caruso, D. (2009). Communicating about xenotransplantation: models and scenarios. Risk Analysis, 29, 1105–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

de Hoog, N., Stroebe, W. and de-Wit, J. B. F. (2005). The impact of fear appeals on processing and acceptance of action recommendations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 24–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

de Jonge, J., Van Trijp, H., Renes, R. J. and Frewer, L. J. (2010). Consumer confidence in the safety of food and newspaper coverage of food safety issues: a longitudinal perspective. Risk Analysis, 30, 125–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

de Man, A. F., Simpson-Housley, P. and Curtis, F. (1984a). Trait anxiety, perception of potential nuclear hazard, and state anxiety. Psychological Reports, 54, 3, 791–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

de Man, A. F., Simpson-Housley, P., Curtis, F. and Smith, D. (1984b). Trait anxiety and response to potential disaster. Psychological Reports, 54, 507–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Souza, L. C. G. (2001). The social representations of the car and the traffic behaviour of youths/as representacoes sociais do carro e o comportamento dos jovens no transito. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, 53, 125–37.Google Scholar

de-Wit, J., Teunis, N., Van Griensven, G. and Sandfort, T. H. (1994). Behavioral risk reduction strategies to prevent HIV infection among homosexual men: a grounded theory approach. AIDS Education and Prevention, 6, 493–505.Google ScholarPubMed

Dedobbeleer, N. and Beland, F. (1991). A safety climate measure for construction sites. Journal of Safety Research, 22, 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deery, H. A. and Love, A. W. (1996). The effect of a moderate dose of alcohol on the traffic hazard perception profile of young drink-drivers. Addiction, 91, 815–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Deitz, S. R. E. and Thoms, W. E. E. (1991). Pilots, Personality, and Performance: Human Behaviour and Stress in the Skies. New York: Quorum Books.Google Scholar

Dejoy, D. M. (1989). An attribution theory perspective on alcohol-impaired driving. Health Education Quarterly, 16, 359–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dejoy, D. M. (1992). An examination of gender differences in traffic accident risk perception. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 24, 237–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dejoy, D. M. (1994). Managing safety in the workplace: an attribution theory analysis and model. Journal of Safety Research, 25, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dekker, S. W. A. (2004). The hindsight bias is not a bias and not about history. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 4, 87–99.Google Scholar

Demicheli, V. et al. (2012). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2, CD004407. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Department of Health (1997). Communicating about Risks to Public Health: Pointers to Good Practice. Department of Health.Google Scholar

Dillon, R. L., Tinsley, C. H. and Cronin, M. (2011). Why near-miss events can decrease an individual’s protective response to hurricanes. Risk Analysis, 31, 440–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dockins, C., Jenkins, R. R., Owens, N., Simon, N. B. and Bembenek Wiggins, L. (2002). Valuation of childhood risk reduction: the importance of age, risk preferences, and perspective. Risk Analysis, 22, 335–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dohle, S., Keller, C. and Siegrist, M. (2010). Examining the relationship between affect and implicit associations: implications for risk perception. Risk Analysis, 30, 1116–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doise, W. (1982). Levels of Explanation in Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dolinski, D., Wojciech, G. and Zawisza, E. (1987). Unrealistic pessimism. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 511–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donald, I. and Canter, D. (1994). Employee attitudes and safety in the chemical industry. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 7, 203–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donohew, L., Bardo, M. T. and Zimmerman, R. S. (2004). Personality and risky behaviour: communication and prevention. In Stelmack, R. M. (ed.), On the Psychobiology of Personality: Essays in Honor of Marvin Zuckerman (pp. 223–45). New York: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorn, L. and Matthews, G. (1995). Prediction of mood and risk appraisals from trait measures: two studies of simulated driving. European Journal of Personality, 9, 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorner, D. (1987). On the difficulties people have in dealing with complexity. In Rasmussen, J., Duncan, K. and Leplat, J. (eds.), New Technologies and Human Error (pp. 97–109). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Dosman, D. M., Adamowicz, W. L. and Hrudey, S. E. (2001). Socioeconomic determinants of health – and food safety – related risk perceptions. Risk Analysis, 21, 307–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Douglas, M. (1982). Essays in the Sociology of Perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Douglas, M. (1986). Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Douglas, M. and Calvez, M. (1990). The self as risk taker: a cultural theory of contagion in relation to AIDS. Sociological Review, 38, 445–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Downs, T. J., Ross, L., Goble, R., Subedi, R., Greenberg, S. and Taylor, O. (2011). Vulnerability, risk perception, and health profile of marginalized people exposed to multiple built-environment stressors in Worcester, Massachusetts: a pilot project. Risk Analysis, 31, 609–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Drottz-Sjöberg, B. M. and Sjöberg, L. (1990). Risk perception and worries after the Chernobyl accident. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10, 135–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunegan, K. J. (1993). Framing cognitive modes, and image theory: toward an understanding of a glass half full. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durodie, B. and Wessely, S. (2002). Resilience or panic? The public and terrorist attack. Lancet, 360, 1901–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Earle, T. C. (2004). Thinking aloud about trust: a protocol analysis of trust in risk management. Risk Analysis, 24, 169–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Earle, T. C. (2010). Trust in risk management: a model-based review of empirical research. Risk Analysis, 30, 541–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Earle, T. C. and Cvetkovich, G. T. (1995). Social Trust: Toward a Cosmopolitan Society. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

The Economist (2012). Blow-ups happen: nuclear plants can be kept safe only by constantly worrying about their dangers. The Economist, 10 March.

Eidinow, E. (2007). Oracles, Curses, and Risk among the Ancient Greeks. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eiser, J. R. and Arnold, B. W. A. (1999). Out in the midday sun: risk behaviour and optimistic beliefs among residents and visitors on Tenerife. Psychology and Health, 14, 529–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eiser, J. R., Miles, S. and Frewer, L. J. (2002). Trust, perceived risk, and attitudes toward food technologies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 2423–33.Google Scholar

Eiser, J. R., Stafford, T., Henneberry, J. and Catney, P. (2009). ‘Trust me, I’m a scientist (not a developer)’: perceived expertise and motives as predictors of trust in assessment of risk from contaminated land. Risk Analysis, 29, 288–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eitzinger, C. and Wiedemann, P. M. (2008). Trust in the safety of tourist destinations: hard to gain, easy to lose? New insights on the asymmetry principle. Risk Analysis, 28, 843–53.Google ScholarPubMed

Ekenes, J. M. and Cameron, S. (1993). Fostering a safety culture. Light Metals, 21–5, 883–7.Google Scholar

Elcheroth, G., Doise, W. and Reicher, S. (2011). On the knowledge of politics and the politics of knowledge: how a social representations approach helps us rethink the subject of political psychology. Political Psychology, 32, 729–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

El-Hajje, E. and Ahmed, R. (1997). The effect of mood on group decision-making. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section B, The Sciences and Engineering, 57, 5976.Google Scholar

Engen, T. (1972). Psychophysics. In Kling, J. W. and Riggs, L. A. (eds.), Experimental Psychology (pp. 1–46). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 3rd edition.Google Scholar

Englander, T., Farago, K., Slovic, P. and Fischhoff, B. (1986). Comparative analysis of risk perception in Hungary and the United States. Social Behaviour, 1, 55–66.Google Scholar

Englich, B. and Soder, K. (2009). Moody experts: how mood and expertise influence judgmental anchoring. Judgmental and Decision Making, 4, 41–50.Google Scholar

Epley, N. and Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back into the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychological Science, 12, 391–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eroglu, C. and Croxton, K. L. (2010). Biases in judgmental adjustments of statistical forecasts: the role of individual differences. International Journal of Forecasting, 26, 116–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eysenck, H. (1967). The Biological Basis of Personality. Springfield: C. C. Thomas.Google Scholar

Eysenck, S. B. G. and Abdel-Khalex, A. M. (1992). Cross-cultural comparisons of the I-sub-7 impulsiveness scales for Egyptian and English adults. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 8, 149–53.Google Scholar

Eysenck, S. B. G., Daum, I., Schugens, M. M. and Diehl, J. M. (1990). A cross-cultural study of impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy: Germany and England. Zeitschrift für Dfferentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 11, 209–13.Google Scholar

Eysenck, S. B. G. and Eysenck, H. J. (1963). On the dual nature of extraversion. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2, 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eysenck, S. B. G. and Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Impulsiveness and venturesomeness: their position in a dimensional scale of personality description. Psychological Reports, 43, 1247–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eysenck, S. B. G. and Eysenck, H. J. (1980). Impulsiveness and venturesomeness in children. Personality and Individual Differences, 1, 73–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eysenck, S. B. G., Pearson, P. R., Easting, G. and Allsopp, J. F. (1985). Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 613–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Facione, N. C. (2002). Perceived risk of breast cancer: influence of heuristic thinking. Cancer Practice, 10, 256–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Feigenson, N. R. and Bailis, D. S. (2001). Air bag safety: media coverage, popular conceptions, and public policy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 444–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, N. M., Cummings, D. A. T., Cauchemez, S. and Fraser, C. (2005). Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in Southeast Asia. Nature, 7056, 209–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, N. M., Cummings, D. A. T., Fraser, C., Cajka, J. C., Cooley, P. C. and Burke, D. S. (2006). Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic. Nature, 7101, 448–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fife-Schaw, C. and Barnett, J. (2003). Measuring optimistic bias. In Breakwell, G. M. (ed.), Doing Social Psychology Research (pp. 54–74). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Fife-Schaw, C. and Rowe, G. (1996). Public perceptions of everyday food hazards: a psychometric study. Risk Analysis, 16, 487–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A. S., Slovic, P. and Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risk and benefits. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 13, 1–17.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, A., Peters, V., Neebe, M., Vávra, J., Kriel, A., Lapka, M. and Megyesi, B. (2012). Climate change? No, wise resource use is the issue: social representations of energy, climate change and the future. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22: 161–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight? Foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288–99.Google Scholar

Fischhoff, B. (1994). The psychology of risk characterization. In Sahlin, N. E. and Brehmer, B. (eds.), Future Risks and Risk Management (pp. 125–39). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischhoff, B. (1995). Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process. Risk Analysis, 15, 137–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fischhoff, B. (1999). Why (cancer) risk communication can be hard. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 25, 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischhoff, B. (2001). Defining stigma. In Flynn, J., Slovic, P. and Kunreuther, H. (eds.), Risk, Media and Stigma: Understanding Public Challenges to Modern Science and Technology (pp. 361–8). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Fischhoff, B. and Beyth, R. (1975). ‘I knew it would happen’: remembered probabilities of once-future things. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 13, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A. and Quadrel, M. J. (1997). Risk Perception and Communication. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A. and Quadrel, M. J. (2000). Risk Perception and Communication. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition.Google Scholar

Fischhoff, B., Gonzalez, R. M. and Lerner, J. S. S. D. A. (2005). Evolving judgments of terror risks: foresight, hindsight, and emotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 124–39.Google ScholarPubMed

Fischhoff, B., Hohenemser, C., Kasperson, R. E. and Kates, R. W. (1978b). Can hazard management be improved?Environment, 20, 16–20, 32–7.Google Scholar

Fischhoff, B. and Kadvany, J. (2011). Risk: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P. and Lichtenstein, S. (1978a). Fault trees: sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 330–44.Google Scholar

Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S. and Combs, B. (1978c). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9, 127–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Florig, H. K., Granger Morgan, M., Morgan, K. M., Jenni, K. E., Fischhoff, B., Fischbeck, P. S. et al. (2001). A deliberative method for ranking risks (1): overview and test bed development. Risk Analysis, 21, 913–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floyd, D. L., Prentice-Dunn, S. and Rogers, R. W. (2000). A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 407–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flynn, J., Peters, E., Mertz, C. K. and Slovic, P. (1998). Risk, media, and stigma at Rocky Flats. Risk Analysis, 18, 715–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flynn, J., Slovic, P. and Kunreuther, H. (eds.) (2001). Risk, Media and Stigma: Understanding Public Challenges to Modern Science and Technology. London: Earthscan.

Flynn, J., Slovic, P. and Mertz, C. K. (1993). The Nevada Initiative: a risk communication fiasco. Risk in File, 138, 497–502.Google Scholar

Flynn, J., Slovic, P. and Mertz, C. K. (1994). Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis, 14, 1101–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fontaine, K. and Snyder, L. B. (1995). Optimistic bias in cancer risk perception: a cross-national study. Psychological Reports, 77, 143–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Forgas, J. P. E. (2000). Feeling and Thinking: The Role of Affect in Social Cognition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Franco, K., Belinson, J., Casey, G., Plummer, S., Tamburrino, M. and Tung, E. (2000). Adjustment to perceived ovarian cancer risk. Psychooncology, 9, 411–17.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

French, D. P., Gayton, E. L., Burton, J., Thorogood, M. and Marteau, T. M. (2002). Measuring perceptions of synergistic circulatory disease risk due to smoking and the oral contraceptive pill. Risk Analysis, 22, 1139–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Freudenburg, W. R. (1992). Nothing succeeds like success? Risk analysis and the organizational amplification of risks. Risk: Issues in Health and Safety, 3, 1–53.Google Scholar

Frewer, L. (1999a). Demographic Differences in Risk Perception and Public Priorities for Risk Mitigation. Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food, UK Government.

Frewer, L. (1999b). Risk perception, social trust, and public participation in strategic decision making: implications for emerging technologies. Ambio, 28, 569–74.Google Scholar

Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D. and Shepherd, R. (1996). What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. Risk Analysis, 16, 473–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frewer, L. J. and Miles, S. (2003). Temporal stability of the psychological determinants of trust: implications for communication about food risks. Health, Risk & Society, 5, 259–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frewer, L. J., Miles, S. and Marsh, R. (2002a). The GM foods controversy: a test of the social amplification of risk model. Risk Analysis, 22, 713–23.Google Scholar

Frewer, L. J., Miles, S. and Marsh, R. (2002b). The media and genetically modified foods: evidence in support of social amplification of risk. Risk Analysis, 22, 701–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frewer, L. J., Raats, M. and Shepherd, R. (1994). Modelling the media: the transmission of risk information in the British quality press. Journal of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications to Industry, 5, 235–47.Google Scholar

Frewer, L. J., Scholderer, J. and Bredahl, L. (2003). Communicating about the risks and benefits of genetically modified foods: the mediating role of trust. Risk Analysis, 23, 1117–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frost, S., Myers, L. B. and Newman, S. P. (2001). Genetic screening for Alzheimer’s disease: what factors predict intentions to take a test?Behavioural Medicine, 27, 101–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fugas, C. S., Silva, S. A. and Meliá, J. L. (2013). Profiling safety behaviors: exploration of the sociocognitive variables that best discriminate between different behavioral patterns. Risk Analysis, 33, 838–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Funabashi, Y and Kitazawa, K (2012). Fukushima in review: A complex disaster, a disastrous response. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 68, 2, 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furnham, A. and Boo, H. C. (2011). A literature review of the anchoring effect. Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 1, 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gadomska, M. (1994). Risk communication. In Radiation and Society: Comprehending Radiation Risk. International Atomic Energy Agency Proceedings, Vienna, vol. 1, pp. 147–66.Google Scholar

Galanter, E. (1990). Utility functions for nonmonetary events. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 449–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galanter, E. and Pliner, P. (1974). Cross-modality matching of money against other continua. In Moskowitz, H., Sharf, B. and Stevens, J. C. (eds.), Sensation and Measurement: Papers in Honour of S. S. Stevens (pp. 65–76). Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallucci, R. (2012). ‘What – me worry?’ ‘Why so serious?’: a personal view on the Fukushima nuclear reactor accidents. Risk Analysis, 32, 1444–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ganzach, Y. (2001). Judging risk and return of financial assets. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 83, 353–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, D. (2009) The Science of Fear: How the Culture of Fear Manipulates Your Brain. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Gardner, G. T. and Gould, L. C. (1989). Public perceptions of the risks and benefits of technology. Risk Analysis, 9, 225–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garvin, T. (2001). The epistemological distances between scientists, policy makers and the public. Risk Analysis, 21, 443–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gasper, K. and Clore, G. L. (1998). The persistent use of negative affect by anxious individuals to estimate risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1350–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gasper, K. and Clore, G. L. (2000). Do you have to pay attention to your feelings to be influenced by them?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 266, 698–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geller, E. S. (1994). Ten principles for achieving a total safety culture. Professional Safety, 39, 18–24.Google Scholar

Geller, E. S. (1995). Key to achieving a total safety culture. Professional Safety, 40, 16–22.Google Scholar

Geller, S., Burns, S. E. and Brailer, D. J. (1996). The impact of nonclinical factors on practice variations: the case of hysterectomies. Health Services Research, 30, 723–50.Google ScholarPubMed

Gescheider, G. A. (1976). Psychophysics: Method and Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Giesecke, J. A., Burns, W. J., Barrett, A., Bayrak, E., Rose, A., Slovic, P. and Suher, M. (2012). Assessment of the regional economic impacts of catastrophic events: CGE Analysis of resource loss and behavioral effects of an RDD attack scenario. Risk Analysis, 32, 583–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gigerenzer, G. (2006). Out of the frying pan into the fire: behavioural reactions to terrorist attacks. Risk Analysis, 26, 347–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gigone, D. and Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 959–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Girandola, F. (2000). Peur et persuasion: présentations des recherches (1953–1998) et d’une nouvelle lecture [Fear and persuasion: review and re-analysis of the literature (1953–1998)]. Année-Psychologique, 100, 333–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glass, T. A. (2001). Understanding public response to disasters. Public Health Reports, 116, 69–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Glass, T. A. and Schoch-Spana, M. (2002). Bioterrorism and the people: how to vaccinate a city against panic. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 34, 217–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 1, 26–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goma-i-Freixanet, M. (2004). Sensation seeking and participation in physical sports. In Stelmack, R. M. (ed.), On the Psychobiology of Personality: Essays in Honor of Marvin Zuckerman (pp. 185–201). New York: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodwin, R., Kozlova, A., Kwiatkowska, A., Luu, L. A. N., Nizharadze, G., Realo, A. et al. (2003). Social representations of HIV/AIDS in Central and Eastern Europe. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 1373–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goodwin, R., Kozlova, A., Nizharadze, G. and Polyakova, G. (2004a). HIV/AIDS among adolescents in Eastern Europe: knowledge of HIV/AIDS, social representations of risk and sexual activity amongst school children and homeless adolescents in Russia, Georgia and the Ukraine. Journal of Health Psychology, 9, 381–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodwin, R., Kwiatkowska, A., Realo, A., Kozlova, A., Luu, L. A. N. and Nizharadze, G. (2004b). Social representations of HIV/AIDS in five Central European and Eastern European countries: a multidimensional analysis. AIDS Care, 16, 669–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gordon, K. E., Dooley, J. M., Camfield, P. R., Camfield, C. S. and MacSween, J. (2002). Parents of children with epilepsy are optimistic for their children’s health, but relatively pessimistic when compared with other parents. Epilepsy and Behaviour, 3, 262–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gorman, J. M. (2005). In the wake of trauma. CNS Spectrums, 10, 81–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goszczynska, M., Tyszka, T. and Slovic, P. (1991). Risk perception in Poland: a comparison with three other countries. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 4, 179–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, L. C., Gardner, G. T., Deluca, D. R., Tiemann, A. R., Doob, L. W. and Strolwijk, J. A. J. (1988). Perceptions of Technological Risks and Benefits. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Graham, J. D. (2001). Decision-analytic refinements of the precautionary principle. Journal of Risk Research, 4, 2, 127–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graham, J. D. and Hsia, S. (2002). Europe’s precautionary principle: promise and pitfalls. Journal of Risk Research, 5, 371–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grasso, B. C., Rothschild, J. M., Jordan, C. W. and Jayaram, G. (2005). What is the measure of a safe hospital? Medication errors missed by risk management, clinical staff, and surveyors. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 11, 268–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grendstad, G. and Grendstad, P. S. (1994). Kultur som Levemate. Politica, 26, 420–38.Google Scholar

Grendstad, G. and Selle, P. (1995). Cultural theory and the new institutionalism. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 7, 1, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grobe, D., Douthitt, R. and Zepeda, L. (1999). A model of consumers’ risk perceptions toward recombinant bovine growth hormone (rbgh): the impact of risk characteristics. Risk Analysis, 19, 661–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grunert, K. G., Brunso, K., Bredahl, L. and Beck, A. C. (2001). Food-related lifestyle: a segmentation approach to European food consumers. In Frewer, L. J., Risvik, E. and Schifferstein, R. (eds.), Food, People and Society (pp. 211–30). Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guldenmund, F. W. (2010). (Mis)understanding safety culture and its relationship to safety management. Risk Analysis, 30, 1466–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gurmankin, A. D., Baron, J. and Armstrong, K. (2004). Intended message versus message received in hypothetical physician risk communication: exploring the gap. Risk Analysis, 24, 1337–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gustafson, P. E. (1998). Gender differences in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 18, 6, 805–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gutteling, J. M. and Kuttschreuter, M. (1999). The millennium bug controversy in the Netherlands: expert views versus public perception. In Goossens, L. H. J. (ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference on Risk Analysis: Facing the New Millennium (pp. 489–93). Delft University Press.Google Scholar

Gutteling, J. M. and Kuttschreuter, M. (2002). The role of expertise in risk communication: lay people’s and experts’ perception of the millennium bug risk in the Netherlands. Journal of Risk Research, 5, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutteling, J. M. and Wiegman, O. (1993). Gender specific reactions to environmental hazards in the Netherlands. Sex Roles, 28, 433–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gwartney-Gibbs, P. A. and Lach, D. H. (1991). Sex differences in attitudes toward nuclear war. Journal of Peace Research, 28, 161–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hakes, J. K. and Viscusi, W. K. (2004). Dead reckoning: demographic determinants of the accuracy of mortality risk perceptions. Risk Analysis, 24, 651–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hallman, J. (2009). Why We Make Mistakes. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar

Halpern-Felsher, B. L., Millstein, S. G., Ellen, J. M., Adler, N. E., Tschann, J. M. and Biehl, M. (2001). The role of behavioural experience in judging risks. Health Psychology, 20, 120–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hammitt, J. K., Wiener, J. B., Swedlow, B., Kall, D. and Zhou, Z. (2005). Precautionary regulation in Europe and the United States: a quantitative comparison. Risk Analysis, 25, 1215–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hammond, S. (2000). Using psychometric tests. In Breakwell, G. M., Hammond, S. and Fife-Schaw, C. (eds.), Research Methods in Psychology (pp. 182–209). London: Sage, 2nd edition.Google Scholar

Hampson, S. E., Andrews, J. A., Barckley, M., Lee, M. E. and Lichtenstein, E. (2003). Assessing perceptions of synergistic health risk: a comparison of two scales. Risk Analysis, 23, 1021–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hampson, S. E., Andrews, J. A., Lee, M. E., Foster, L. S., Glasgow, R. E. and Lichtenstein, E. (1998). Lay understanding of synergistic risk: the case of radon and cigarette smoking. Risk Analysis, 18, 343–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Han, S. and Lerner, J. S. (2009). Decision making. In Sander, D. and Scherer, K. R. (eds.), Oxford Companion to Emotion and the Affective Sciences (pp. 111–13). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Handmer, J. and Penning-Rowsell, E. (1990). Hazards and the Communication of Risk. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar

Hanekamp, J. C. (2006). Precaution and cholera: a response to Tickner and Gouveia-Vigeant. Risk Analysis, 26, 1013–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hanekamp, J. C., Vera-Navas, G. and Verstegen, S. W. (2005). The historical roots of precautionary thinking: the cultural ecological critique and ‘The Limits to Growth’. Journal of Risk Research, 8, 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathology Checklist Revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar

Harmon, K. (2012). Japan’s post-Fukushima earthquake health woes go beyond radiation effects. Nature. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, G., Rice, M. and Quincy, V. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: the development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice Behaviour, 20, 315–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, P., Middleton, W. and Joiner, R. (2000). The typical student as an ingroup member: eliminating optimistic bias by reducing social distance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 235–54.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

’t Hart, P. and Pijnenburg, B. (1989). The Heizel Stadium tragedy. In Charles, M. T. and Rosenthal, U. (eds.), Coping with Crisis: The Management of Disasters, Riots and Terrorism (pp. 197–224). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar

Haselton, M. G. and Buss, D. M. (2001). Emotional reactions following first-time sexual intercourse: the affective shift hypothesis. Personal Relationships, 8, 357–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hashiguchi, K. (1974). The number of decision makers and the level of risk taking within a group. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 123–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hassan, A. (1986). Circumcision in the Sudan. Unpublished MSc dissertation, University of Surrey, Guildford.

Hastings, G., Stead, M. and Webb, J. (2004). Fear appeals in social marketing: strategic and ethical reasons for concern. Psychology & Marketing, 21, 961–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Health and Safety Commission (1991). Major Hazard Aspects of the Transport of Dangerous Substances. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Heath, R. L. and Palenchar, M. (2000). Community relations and risk communication: a longitudinal study of the impact of emergency response messages. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12, 131–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heaven, P. C. (1991). Venturesomeness, impulsiveness, and Eysenck’s personality dimensions: a study among Australian adolescents. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 152, 91–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hedge, B. (1989). Worried well and psychological issues. AIDS Care, 1, 193–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Heffernan, M. (2011). Wilful Blindness. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Heilbrun, K. (1999). Basic and advanced issues in risk assessment. Paper presented at Workshop of the Department of Public Welfare, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Heine, S. J. and Lehman, D. R. (1995). Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: does the West feel more invulnerable than the East?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 595–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helsloot, I. and Ruitenberg, A. (2004). Citizen response to disasters. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 12, 98–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helweg-Larsen, M. (1999). (The lack of) optimistic biases in response to the 1994 Northridge earthquake: the role of personal experience. Journal of Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 110–29.Google Scholar

Helweg-Larsen, M., Sadeghian, P. and Webb, M. S. (2002). The stigma of being pessimistically biased. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 21, 1, 92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henderson, V. R., Hennessy, M., Barrett, D. W., Curtis, B., McCoy-Roth, M., Trentacoste, N. et al. (2005). When risky is attractive: sensation seeking and romantic partner selection. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 311–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hendrick, S. and Hendrick, C. (1987). Love and sex attitudes, self-disclosure and sensation-seeking. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 281–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hertwig, R., Fenselow, C. and Hoffrage, U. (2003). Hindsight bias: knowledge and heuristics affect our reconstruction of the past. Memory, 11, 357–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hess, A. K. and Weiner, I. B. (eds.) (1999). Handbook of Forensic Psychology. New York: John Wiley, 2nd edition.

Higbee, K. L. (1972). Group risk taking in military decisions. Journal of Social Psychology, 88, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Highhouse, S. and Paese, P. W. (1996). Problem domain and prospect frame: choice under opportunity versus threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 124–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hillier, L. M. and Morrongiello, B. A. (1998). Age and gender differences in school-age children’s appraisals of injury risk. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 23, 4, 229–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Himiob-de-Marcano, M. (2000). Cuando el panico es de todos: como conservar la calma para ayudar a nuestros hermanos directamente traumatizados [When panic seizes everybody: how to remain calm to help our fellow-men directly traumatised]. Tropicos: Revista de Psicoanalisis, 8, 149–52.Google Scholar

Hinman, G. W., Rosa, E. A., Kleinhesselink, R. R. and Lowinger, T. C. (1993). Perceptions of nuclear and other risks in Japan and the United States. Risk Analysis, 13, 449–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hiraba, J., Bao, W. N., Lorenz, F. O. and Pechacova, Z. (1998). Perceived risk of crime in the Czech Republic. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 225–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

HMSO (2000). The BSE Inquiry. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar

HMSO (2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. Chaired by Robert Francis. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar

Hoffrage, U., Hertwig, R. and Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Hindsight bias: a byproduct of knowledge updating?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 566–81.Google Scholar

Hogg, M. A., Turner, J. C. and Davidson, B. (1990). Polarized norms and social frames of reference: a test of the self-categorization theory of group polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hogg, M. A. and Vaughan, G. M. (1998). Leadership and group decision-making. In Hogg, M. A. and Vaughan, G. M. (eds.), Social Psychology: An Introduction (pp. 300–6). London: Prentice-Hall, 2nd edition.Google Scholar

Hohenemser, C. and Renn, O. (1988). Chernobyl’s other legacy: shifting public perceptions of nuclear risk. Environment, 30, 3, 4–11.Google Scholar

Hohl, K. and Gaskell, G. (2008). European public perceptions of food risk: cross-national and methodological comparisons. Risk Analysis, 28, 311–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holzl, E. and Kirchler, E. (2005). Causal attribution and hindsight bias for economic developments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 167–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hongo, Jun (2012). Panel lays bare Fukushima recipe for disaster. Japan Times, 29 February, p. 1.Google Scholar

Horlick-Jones, T., Rosenhead, J., Georgiou, I., Ravetz, J. and Löfstedt, R. (2001). Decision support for organisational risk management by problem structuring. Health, Risk & Society, 3, 141–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hornig, S. (1992). Framing risks: audience and reader factors. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 679–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hornig Priest, S. (1999). The never-ending story of dioxin. In Friedman, S. M., Dunwoody, S. and Rogers, C. L. (eds.), Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science (pp. 190–201). New York: LEA.Google Scholar

Horswill, M. S. and McKenna, F. P. (1999a). The effect of interference on dynamic risk taking judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 189–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horswill, M. S. and McKenna, F. P. (1999b). The effect of perceived control on risk taking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 29, 377–91.Google Scholar

Horvath, P. and Zuckerman, M. (1993). Sensation seeking, risk appraisal, and risky behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hossain, F. and Onyango, B. (2004). Product attributes and consumer acceptance of nutritionally enhanced genetically modified foods. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 28, 255–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Houlding, C. and Davidson, R. (2003). Beliefs as predictors of condom use by injecting drug users in treatment. Health Education Research, 18, 145–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

House of Lords (2006). Government Policy on the Management of Risk. Select Committee on Economic Affairs, 5th Report of Session 2005–6 (June 2006).

House of Lords (2011). Behaviour Change (Report 179). London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar

Howard, R. (1980). On making life and death decisions. In Richard, J., Schwing, C., and Albers, W. A. (eds.), Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough? (pp. 89–99). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howarth, C. (2006). A social representation is not a quiet thing: exploring the critical potential of social representations theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45: 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howel, D., Moffatt, S., Prince, H., Bush, J. and Dunn, C. E. (2002). Urban air quality in north-east England: exploring the influences on local views and perceptions. Risk Analysis, 22, 121–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

HSE (1993). ACSNI Study Group on Human Factors. Third Report: Organising for Safety. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

HSE (2001). Reducing Risks, Protecting People: HSE’s Decision-Making Process. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Hsee, C. K. and Weber, E. U. (1999). Cross-national differences in risk preference and lay predictions. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 12, 2, 165–79.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Humphrey, J. C. (1998). Self organise and survive: disabled people in the British trade union movement. Disability and Society, 13, 587–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunton, J. and Rose, J. M. (2005). Cellular telephones and driving performance: the effects of attentional demands on motor vehicle crash risk. Risk Analysis, 25, 855–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hutter, B. M. (2001). Regulation and Risk: Occupational Health and Safety on the Railways. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Imrie, R. (1999). The role of access groups in facilitating accessible environments for disabled people. Disability and Society, 14, 463–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group (1991). Safety Series No 75-INSAG-4. Vienna: IAEA.Google Scholar

Irwin, W., Davidson, R. J., Lowe, M. J., Mock, B. J., Sorenson, J. A. and Turski, P. A. (1996). Human amygdala activation detected with echo-planar functional magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroReport, 7, 1765–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Isenberg, D. J. (1986). Group polarization: a critical review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1141–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, A. (2009). The pathologies of big data. ACMQueue, 6 July.

Janis, I. L. (1971). Groupthink. Psychology Today, 43–6, 344.Google Scholar

Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Janoff-Bulman, R. and Frieze, I. H. (1983). A theoretical perspective for understanding reactions to victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaspal, R. and Breakwell, G. M. (eds.) (2014). Identity Process Theory: Identity, Social Action and Social Change. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Jeffcott, S., Pidgeon, N., Weyman, A. and Walls, J. (2006). Risk, trust, and safety culture in the UK train operating companies. Risk Analysis, 26, 1105–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jianguang, Z. (1993). Environmental hazards in the Chinese public’s eyes. Risk Analysis, 13, 509–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed