Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:21:45.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Comprehension of Text in Problem Solving

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Shannon Whitten
Affiliation:
The University of Memphis
Arthur C. Graesser
Affiliation:
The University of Memphis
Janet E. Davidson
Affiliation:
Lewis and Clark College, Portland
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Imagine that on some unlucky weekday morning your coffee machine breaks down. For many of us, notably the authors of this chapter, this would be a serious problem. One way of solving this urgent problem is by physically fumbling with the broken machine, trying to fix it by using problem-solving heuristics or sheer trial and error. As an alternative, text would come to the rescue. You could read the manual that came with the machine. You could look in a book on household repairs. You could also consult the Internet. When you pursue any of these latter options, you must be able to comprehend the text and apply what you have learned. This chapter explores the factors that predict your success in solving problems such as the broken coffee machine after reading a text.

Whenever texts are successfully used to solve a problem, the solver must accurately represent both the problem and the messages presented in the texts. A text representation is a cognitive representation that has some reference to elements, features, or structural patterns in the explicit text. Many factors contribute to the construction of text representations. To put it simply, two classes of factors are properties of the text (such as its organization into topics, subtopics, and sentences) and properties of the reader (such as domain-specific knowledge and general reading skill). One of the central assumptions of this chapter is that text representations constrain problem solving.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Language comprehension: Archival memory or preparation form situated action? Discourse processes, 28, 61–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660Google ScholarPubMed
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Hamilton, R. L., & Kucan, L. (1997). Questioning the author: An approach for enhancing student engagement with text. Delaware: International Reading Association
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
Brooks, C., & Warren, R. P. (1972). Modern rhetoric. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
Catrambone, R. (1994). Improving examples to improve transfer t novel problems. Memory & Cognition, 22, 606–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catrambone, R. (1996). Generalizing solution procedures learned from examples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1020–1031Google Scholar
Catrambone, R., Jones, C. M., Jonicles, J., & Seifert, C. (1995). Reasoning about curvilinear motions: Using principles or analogy. Memory & Cognition, 23, 368–373CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clement, C. A., & Gentner, D. (1991). Systematicity as a selection constraint in analogical mapping. Cognitive Science, 15, 89–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cote, N., Goldman, S. R., & Saul, E. U. (1998). Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation. Discourse Processes, 25, 1–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbus, K. D., Gentner, D., & Law, K. (1994). A model of similarity-based retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19, 141–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, N., & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1994). Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science, 5, 152–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure-mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., & Stevens, A. (1983). Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Two decades of structure building. Discourse Processes, 23, 265–304CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Congnitive Psychology, 15, 1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1–55Google ScholarPubMed
Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28, 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, S. R., Saul, E. U., & Cote, N. (1995). Paragraphing, reader, and task effects on discourse comprehension. Discourse Processes, 20, 273–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Bowers, C., Olde, B., & Pomeroy, V. (1999). Who said what? Source memory for narrator and character agents in literary short stories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 284–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C., & Clark, L. F. (1985). Structures and procedures of implicit knowledge. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Graesser, A. C., Kassler, M. A., Kreuz, R. J., & McLain-Allen, B. (1998). Verification of statements about story worlds that deviate from normal conceptions of time: What is true about Einstein's Dreams? Cognitive Psychology, 35, 246–301CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163–189CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holyoak, K. J., & Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 15, 332–340CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Kieras, D., & Bovair, S. (1984). The role of a mental model in learning to operate a device. Cognitive Science, 8, 255–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Kintsch, W., & Greeno, J. G. (1985). Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. Psychological Review, 92, 109–129CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kintsch, W., & vanDijk, T. A. (1978). Towards a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassaline, M. E. (1996). Structural alignment in induction and similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 754–770Google ScholarPubMed
Lorch, R. F., & O'Brien, J. D. (1995). Sources of coherence in reading. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Lucangeli, D., Tressoldi, P. E., & Cendron, M. (1998). Cognitive and metacognitive abilities involved in the solution of mathematical word problems: Validation of a comprehensive model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 257–275CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mannes, S. M., & Kintsch, W. (1987). Knowledge organization and text organization. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 91–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 357–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440–466CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from text: Effect of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millis, K. K, King, A., & Kim, H. J. (2000). Updating situation models from text: A test of the situational operator model. Discourse Processes, 30, 201–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novick, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 510–520Google ScholarPubMed
Novick, L. R. (1990). Representational transfer in problem solving. Psychological Science, 1, 128–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nystrand, M. (1986). The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between readers and writers. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Otero, J., & Kintsch, W. (1992). Failure to detect contradictions in text: What readers believe vs. what they read. Psychological Science, 3, 229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Britt, M. A. (1995). Where do propositions come from? In C. A. Weaver, S. Mannes, & C. R. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 11–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1994). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published in 1978.)
Schank, R. P. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1995). In R. S. Wyer (Ed.) Advances in social cognition: Vol. 8, Knowledge and memory: The real story (pp. 1–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Schraw, G., & Bruning, R. (1996). Reader's implicit models of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 290–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, M., & Kintsch, W. (2001). Text retrieval: A theoretical explanation. Discourse Processes, 31, 27–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. P. (1996). Conscious understanding during comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 255–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T., & Suh, S. (1993). Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on-line inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes, 16, 3–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voss, J. F., & Silfies, L. N. (1996). Learning from history texts: The interaction of knowledge and comprehension skill with text structure. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 45–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, M. L., & Gentner, D. (1998). Structure in category-based induction. Proceedings of the twentieth annual conference of the cognitive science society, 1154–1158Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Effects of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 920–933Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin,CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Embodied cognition, perceptual symbols, and situation models. Discourse Processes, 28, 81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×