Book contents
- Psychology of Democracy
- Psychology of Democracy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter 1 Psychology of Democracy
- Part I Of the People
- Part II By the People
- Chapter 8 Trust in Political Institutions and Support for Authoritarianism
- Chapter 9 New Technology, Language and Gesture in Contemporary Indian Political Discourse
- Chapter 10 Fact or Fiction
- Chapter 11 Dissecting the Psychology of a Voter
- Chapter 12 Building Trust through a Revolving Door of Leaders:
- Chapter 13 After the Party Is Over
- Part III For the People
- Index
- References
Chapter 8 - Trust in Political Institutions and Support for Authoritarianism
Latin American Students – Does Civic Knowledge Make a Difference?
from Part II - By the People
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2022
Book contents
- Psychology of Democracy
- Psychology of Democracy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter 1 Psychology of Democracy
- Part I Of the People
- Part II By the People
- Chapter 8 Trust in Political Institutions and Support for Authoritarianism
- Chapter 9 New Technology, Language and Gesture in Contemporary Indian Political Discourse
- Chapter 10 Fact or Fiction
- Chapter 11 Dissecting the Psychology of a Voter
- Chapter 12 Building Trust through a Revolving Door of Leaders:
- Chapter 13 After the Party Is Over
- Part III For the People
- Index
- References
Summary
Trust in political institutions represents a central component of democratic systems. When citizens lack confidence in state bodies, such as the government and parliament, the legitimacy of democracy is dangerously challenged. In the case of Latin America, we observe a critical scenario, with a steady decrease of institutional trust in the last decade, accompanied by alarming levels of support for authoritarian regimes. Most of the previous evidence in this regard refers to the adult population and omits the young generation who certainly have a stake in the future of democracy in the region. Focusing on the role of the acquisition of civic knowledge at school as a protective factor for democracy, we analyse the role of civic knowledge to understand trust in civic institutions and authoritarian attitudes among fourteen-year-old students. The data correspond to the International Civic and Citizenship Education Study (ICCS) of 2009 and 2016, in which seven Latin American countries participated. The results indicate the puzzling role of civic knowledge, as it diminishes trust in institutions, yet at the same time reduces authoritarian beliefs. The consequences for democracy and citizenship education are addressed.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Psychology of DemocracyOf the People, By the People, For the People, pp. 173 - 194Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Almond, G. A. and Verba, S. (1989). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. (First edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bargsted, M., Somma, N. and Castillo, J. C. (2017). Dynamics of political trust in Latin America. In Zmerli, S. and van der Meer, T. W. G. (Eds.), Handbook on political trust (pp. 395–417). etc. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Carrasco, D., Banerjee, R., Treviño, E. and Villalobos, C. (2019). Civic knowledge and open classroom discussion: Explaining tolerance of corruption among 8th-grade students in Latin America. Educational Psychology, 40(2), 186–206.Google Scholar
Castillo, J. C., Miranda, D., Bonhomme, M., Cox, C. and Bascopé, M. (2015). Mitigating the political participation gap from the school: The roles of civic knowledge and classroom climate. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(1), 16–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castillo, J. C., Miranda, D., Bonhomme, M., Cox, C. and Bascopé, M. (2014). Social inequality and changes in students’ expected political participation in Chile. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 9(2), 140–156.Google Scholar
Catterberg, G. and Moreno, A. (2006). The individual bases of political trust: Trends in new and established democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(1), 31–48.Google Scholar
Ching, B. H.-H., Xu, J. T., Chen, T. T. and Kong, K. H. C. (2020). Gender essentialism, authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and filial piety as predictors for transprejudice in Chinese people. Sex Roles, 83(1), 426–441 doi:10.1007/s11199-020-01123-3Google Scholar
Citrin, J. and Stoker, L. (2018). Political trust in a cynical age. Annual Review of Political Science, 21(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050316-092550Google Scholar
Cox, C. (2010). Informe de Referente Regional 2010. Oportunidades de aprendizaje escolar de la ciudadanía en América Latina: currículos comparados. Sistema Regional de Evaluación y Desarrollo de Competencias Ciudadanas (SREDECC), Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Bogotá: CERLALCGoogle Scholar
Cox, C. and Castillo, J. C. (Eds.). (2015). Aprendizaje de la ciudadanía: Contextos, experiencias y resultados (First). Santiago, Chile: Ediciones UC.Google Scholar
Dageförde, M. and Schindler, D. (2018). ‘Oh, that is a big word’. MPs’ and citizens’ perspectives on parliamentary representation. In Paterson, W. and Saalfeld, T. (Eds), Political Representation in France and Germany: Attitudes and Activities of Citizens and MPs. (pp. 197–226). Switzerland, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
de Viteri Vázquez, A. S. and Bjørnskov, C. (2020). Constitutional power concentration and corruption: Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean, Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, 31(4), 509–536.Google Scholar
Duckitt, J. (2015). Authoritarian personality. In Wright, J. D. (editor-in-chief), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences 2nd edition (Vol. 2) (pp. 255–261). Oxford, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Funke, F. (2005). The dimensionality of right-wing authoritarianism: Lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26(2), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14%2067-9221.2005.00415.xGoogle Scholar
Galston, W. A. (2007). Civic knowledge, civic education, and civic engagement: A summary of recent research. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(6–7), 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690701215888Google Scholar
Galston, W. A. (2001). Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.217Google Scholar
Gershtenson, J. and Plane, D. L. (2015). In government we distrust: Citizen skepticism and democracy in the United States. The Forum, 13(3). doi:10.1515/for-2015-0029Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (2001). Norms of cooperativeness and networks of trust, (with Karen S. Cook). In Hechter, M. and Opp, K-D. (Eds.), Social norms (pp. 327–347). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hite, K. and Cesarini, P. (2004) (Eds.). Authoritarian legacies and democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Kirsten, W. (2020). Cold War archives and democratic aspirations in Latin America. In Mizruchi, S. L. (Ed), Cold War archives and democratic aspirations in Latin America (pp. 149–170). Switzerland, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Köhler, H., Weber, S., Brese, F., Schulz, W. and Carstens, R. (2018). ICCS 2016 User Guide for the International Database: IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2016 Latin American Report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.Google Scholar
Lauglo, J. (2013). Do more knowledgeable adolescents have more rationally based civic attitudes? Analysis of 38 countries. Educational Psychology, 33(3), 262–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2%20013.772773Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political man: The social bases of politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. The American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/1951731Google Scholar
Martini, S. and Quaranta, M. (2020). Political Support in Flux. In Martini, S. and Quaranta, M. (Eds.), Citizens and Democracy in Europe: Contexts, Changes and Political Support (pp. 1–20). Switzerland, Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bfm%3A978-3-030-21633-7%2F1.pdf.Google Scholar
Miranda, D., Castillo, J. C. and Cumsille, P. (2018). The political socialization of attitudes toward equal rights from a comparative perspective. In Sandoval-Hernández, A., Isac, M. and Miranda, D. (Eds), Teaching tolerance in a globalized world. IEA Research for Education. (A series of in-depth analyses based on data of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)), vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78692-6_7Google Scholar
Morales Quiroga, M. (2020). Estallido social en Chile 2019: participación, representación, confianza institucional y escándalos públicos. Análisis Político, 33(98), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.15446/anpol.v33n98.89407Google Scholar
Offe, C. (1999). How can we trust our fellow citizens? In Warren, M. E. (Ed.), Democracy and Trust (pp. 42–87). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511659959.003Google Scholar
Rapeli, L. (2013). The conception of citizen knowledge in democratic theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sandoval-Hernandez, A., Miranda, D., Treviño, E. and Schmelkes, S. (2019). Is democracy overrated? Latin American students’ support for dictatorships. IEA Compass: Briefs in education. Number 7. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.Google Scholar
Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Cox, C. and Friedman, T. (2018). Young People’s Views of Government, Peaceful Coexistence, and Diversity in Five Latin American Countries: IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2016 Latin American Report. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95393-9Google Scholar
Schulz, W., Ainley, J. and Fraillon, J. (2011). ICCS 2009 Technical Report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.Google Scholar
Schulz, W. and Sibberns, H. (2004). IEA Civic Education Study Technical Report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.Google Scholar
Schyns, P. and Koop, C. (2009). Political distrust and social capital in Europe and the USA. Social Indicators Research, 96(1), 145–167. doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9471-4Google Scholar
Segovia, C., Haye, A., González, R., Manzi, J. and Carvacho, H. (2008). Confianza en instituciones políticas en Chile: Un modelo de los componentes centrales de juicios de confianza. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), 28(2), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718–090X2008000200002Google Scholar
Sochos, A. (2019). Authoritarianism, trauma, and insecure bonds during the Greek economic crisis. Current Psychology. doi:10.1007/s12144-018-0111-5Google Scholar
Torney-Purta, J., Richardson, W. K. and Barber, C. H. (2004). Trust in Government-Related Institutions and Civic Engagement among Adolescents: Analysis of Five Countries from the IEA Civic Education Study. CIRCLE Working Paper 17. Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.Google Scholar
Uslaner, E. M. (2018). The Oxford handbook of social and political trust. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van der Meer, T. and Hakhverdian, A. (2016). Political Trust as the Evaluation of Process and Performance: A Cross-National Study of 42 European Countries: Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321715607514Google Scholar
Zmerli, S. and van der Meer, T. W. G. (2017). Handbook on political trust. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar