Aaldering, L. and Van Der Pas, D. J. (2018). Political leadership in the media: Gender bias in leader stereotypes during campaign and routine times. British Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 1–21.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J. and Sanford, N. J. (1950). Types and syndromes. In The authoritarian personality (Studies in Prejudice Series, American Jewish Committee). New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Allen, N., Magni, G., Searing, D. and Warncke, P. (2020). What is a career politician? Theories, concepts, and measures. European Political Science Review, 12(2), 199–217.Google Scholar

Allen, P. and Cairney, P. (2017). What do we mean when we talk about the ‘political class’? Political Studies Review, 15(1), 18–27.Google Scholar

Antonakis, J. (2011). Predictors of leadership: The usual suspects and the suspect traits. In Bryman, A., Collinson, D., Grint, K., Jackson, B. and Uhl-Bien, M. (Eds.), Sage handbook of leadership (pp. 269–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Antonakis, J., Bastardoz, N. and Rönkkö, M. (2019, July). The endogeneity problem in random intercept models: Are most published results likely false? Academy of Management Proceedings, 2019(1), 18927.Google Scholar

Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P. and Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086–1120.Google Scholar

Barber, J. D. (1972). The presidential character: Predicting performance in the White House. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Best, H. (2011). Does personality matter in politics? Personality factors as determinants of parliamentary recruitment and policy preferences. Comparative Sociology, 10(6), 928–948.Google Scholar

Bjarnegård, E. and Kenny, M. (2015). Revealing the “secret garden”: The informal dimensions of political recruitment. Politics and Gender, 11(4), 748–753.Google Scholar

Bligh, M. C., Kohles, J. C. and Pillai, R. (2011). Romancing leadership: Past, present, and future. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1058–1077.Google Scholar

Bono, J. E. and Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 901.Google Scholar

Buendgens-Kosten, J. (2014). Authenticity. ELT Journal, 68(4), 457–459.Google Scholar

Callander, S. (2008). Political motivations. The Review of Economic Studies, 75(3), 671–697.Google Scholar

Campbell, R. and Childs, S. (2010). ‘Wags’, ’wives’ and ‘mothers’… but what about women politicians? Parliamentary Affairs, 63(4), 760–777.Google Scholar

Campbell, R. and Cowley, P. (2014). What voters want: Reactions to candidate characteristics in a survey experiment. Political Studies, 62(4), 745–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, R. and Lovenduski, J. (2015). What should MPs do? Public and parliamentarians’ views compared. Parliamentary Affairs, 68(4), 690–708.Google Scholar

Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Consiglio, C., Picconi, L. and Zimbardo, P. G. (2003). Personalities of politicians and voters: Unique and synergistic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 849–856.Google Scholar

Caprara, G. V. and Cervone, D. (2000). Personality: Determinants, dynamics, and potentials. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Caprara, G. V., Francescato, D., Mebane, M., Sorace, R. and Vecchione, M. (2010). Personality foundations of ideological divide: A comparison of women members of parliament and women voters in Italy. Political Psychology, 31(5), 739–762.Google Scholar

Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M. and Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caprara, G. V. and Silvester, J. (2018). The personality attributes of political elites. In Best, H. and Higley, J. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of political elites (pp. 467–488). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M. and Schwartz, S. H. (2012). Why people do not vote: The role of personal values. European Psychologist, 17, 266–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caprara, G. V. and Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Personalizing politics: A congruency model of political preference. American Psychologist, 59(7), 581–594.Google Scholar

Cassese, E. C. and Holman, M. R. (2018). Party and gender stereotypes in campaign attacks. Political Behavior, 40(3), 785–807.Google Scholar

Christie, R. and Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Corr, P. J. and Matthews, G. (Eds.). (2009). The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T. Jr. and McCrae, R. R. (2006). Trait and factor theories. In Thomas, J. C. and Segal, D. L. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of personality and psychopathology (Vol. I). Personality and everyday functioning 36. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Costantini, E. and Craik, K. H. (1980). Personality and politicians: California party leaders, 1960–1976. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 641–661.Google Scholar

Davis, K. M. and Gardner, W. L. (2012). Charisma under crisis revisited: Presidential leadership, perceived leader effectiveness, and contextual influences. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 918–933.Google Scholar

de Vries, R. E. and van Prooijen, J. W. (2019). Voters rating politicians’ personality: Evaluative biases and assumed similarity on honesty-humility and openness to experience. Personality and Individual Differences, 144, 100–104.Google Scholar

Deluga, R. J. (2001). American presidential Machiavellianism: Implications for charismatic leadership and rated performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(3), 339–363.Google Scholar

Deluga, R. J. (1998). American presidential proactivity, charismatic leadership, and rated performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 9(3), 265–291.Google Scholar

Diermeier, D., Keane, M. and Merlo, A. (2005). A political economy model of congressional careers. American Economic Review, 95(1), 347–373.Google Scholar

Dietrich, B. J., Lasley, S., Mondak, J. J., Remmel, M. L. and Turner, J. (2012). Personality and legislative politics: The Big Five trait dimensions among US state legislators. Political Psychology, 33(2), 195–210.Google Scholar

Duckitt, J. (2020). Authoritarianism. In Zeigler-Hill, V. and Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1046Google Scholar

Dudley, N. M., Orvis, K. A., Lebiecki, J. E. and Cortina, J. M. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 40.Google Scholar

Dumitrica, D. (2014). Politics as “customer relations”: Social media and political authenticity in the 2010 municipal elections in Calgary, Canada. Javnost-The Public, 21(1), 53–69.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H. and Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573.Google Scholar

Enli, G. (2017). Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: Exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. European Journal of Communication, 32(1), 50–61.Google Scholar

Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C. and McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557.Google Scholar

Foti, R. J., Bray, B. C., Thompson, N. J. and Allgood, S. F. (2012). Know thy self, know thy leader: Contributions of a pattern-oriented approach to examining leader perceptions. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(4), 702–717.Google Scholar

Fredriksson, P. G., Wang, L. and Mamun, K. A. (2011). Are politicians office or policy motivated? The case of US governors’ environmental policies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62(2), 241–253.Google Scholar

Gallagher, M. and Marsh, M. (1988). Candidate selection in comparative perspective: The secret garden of politics (Vol. 18). London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar

Garzia, D. (2011). The personalization of politics in Western democracies: Causes and consequences on leader–follower relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(4), 697–709.Google Scholar

George, A. L. and George, J. L. (1998). Presidential personality and performance. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar

Hart, W., Adams, J. M. and Burton, K. A. (2016). Narcissistic for the people: Narcissists and non-narcissists disagree about how to make a good impression. Personality and Individual Differences, 91, 69–73, ISSN 0191-8869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hermann, M. G. (1980). Explaining foreign policy behavior using the personal characteristics of political leaders. International Studies Quarterly, 24(1), 7–46.Google Scholar

House, R. J., Spangler, W. D. and Woycke, J. (1991). Personality and charisma in the US Lombardo, MM, Ruderman, MN, and McCauley, CD (1988). Explanations of success and derailment in upper-level management positions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2, 199–216.Google Scholar

Jones, B. (2016). Authenticity in political discourse. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 19(2), 489–504.Google Scholar

Jordan, K. N. and Pennebaker, J. W. (2017). The exception or the rule: Using words to assess analytic thinking, Donald Trump, and the American presidency. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(3), 312.Google Scholar

Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R. and Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780.Google Scholar

Judge, T. A., Colbert, A. E. and Ilies, R. (2004). Intelligence and leadership: A quantitative review and test of theoretical propositions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 542–552.Google Scholar

Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F. and Kosalka, T. (2009). The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 855–875.Google Scholar

Kapoutsis, I., Papalexandris, A., Treadway, D. C. and Bentley, J. (2017). Measuring political will in organizations: Theoretical construct development and empirical validation. Journal of Management, 43(7), 2252–2280.Google Scholar

Kartik, N. and McAfee, R. P. (2007). Signaling character in electoral competition. American Economic Review, 97(3), 852–870.Google Scholar

Klinger, J. D., Hollibaugh, G. E. and Ramey, A. J. (2019). What I like about you: Legislator personality and legislator approval. Political Behavior, 41 , 499–525.Google Scholar

Knapen, J. E., Blaker, N. M. and Pollet, T. V. (2017). Size, skills, and suffrage: Motivated distortions in perceived formidability of political leaders. PLoS ONE, 12(12), e0188485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kowert, P. A. (1996). Where does the buck stop?: Assessing the impact of presidential personality. Political Psychology, 17(3), 421–452.Google Scholar

Krook, M. and Childs, S. (2010). Women, gender, and politics: A reader. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Langton, K. P. (1969). Political socialization (Vol. 1). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lawless, J. L. (2015). Female candidates and legislators. Annual Review of Political Science, 18, 349–366.Google Scholar

Lee, E. J., Lee, H. Y. and Choi, S. (2020). Is the message the medium? How politicians’ Twitter blunders affect perceived authenticity of Twitter communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106188.Google Scholar

Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J. and De Vader, C. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(3), 343–378.Google Scholar

Lyons, M. (1997). Presidential character revisited. Political Psychology, 18(4), 791–811.Google Scholar

McCann, S. J. (1992). Alternative formulas to predict the greatness of U.S. presidents: Personological, situational, and zeitgeist factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(3), 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLaughlin, H., Silvester, J., Sealy, R., Billimoria, D., Peters, K., Huse, M., Moltner, H., Jane, S. and Göke, J. (2018). Women in power: Contributing factors that impact on women in organizations and politics; psychological research and best practice. Organizational Dynamics, 47 , 189–199.Google Scholar

McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R. (2009). The Five-Factor Model of personality traits: Consensus and controversy. In Corr, P. and Matthews, G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 148–161). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R. and Costa, P. T. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R. and Sutin, A. R. (2018). A five‐factor theory perspective on causal analysis. European Journal of Personality, 32(3), 151–166.Google Scholar

Mondak, J. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mondak, J. J. and Halperin, K. D. (2008). A framework for the study of personality and political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 335–362.Google Scholar

Murray, G. R. and Schmitz, J. D. (2011). Caveman politics: Evolutionary leadership preferences and physical stature. Social Science Quarterly, 92(5), 1215–1235.Google Scholar

Murray, R. (2010). Cracking the highest glass ceiling: A global comparison of women’s campaigns for executive office. Santa Barbara: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar

Nai, A., Martínez i Coma, F. and Maier, J. (2019). Donald Trump, populism, and the Age of Extremes: Comparing the personality traits and campaigning styles of Trump and other leaders worldwide. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 49(3), 609–643.Google Scholar

Olivola, C. Y. and Todorov, A. (2010). Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34(2), 83–110.Google Scholar

Pillai, R., Williams, E. A., Lowe, K. B. and Jung, D. I. (2003). Personality, transformational leadership, trust, and the 2000 US presidential vote. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(2), 161–192.Google Scholar

Post, L. A., Raile, A. N. and Raile, E. D. (2010). Defining political will. Politics and Policy, 38(4), 653–676.Google Scholar

POTUS.com (2020). Presidential Heights. Accessed from www.potus.com/presidential-facts/presidential-heights/.Google Scholar

Ramey, A., Klingler, J. and Hollibaugh, G. (2016). Measuring elite personality using speech. Political Science Research and Methods, 7(1), 163–184.Google Scholar

Raskin, R. N. and Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45(2), 590.Google Scholar

Rice, M. G., Remmel, M. L. and Mondak, J. J. (2020). Personality on the Hill: Expert Evaluations of US Senators’ Psychological Traits. Political Research Quarterly, 74(3), 674–687. doi:10.1177/1065912920928587Google Scholar

Roets, A. and Van Hiel, A. (2009). The ideal politician: Impact of voters’ ideology. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(1), 60–65.Google Scholar

Rohrer, S. R. (2014). What makes a prime minister great?: A leadership trait analysis of the effectiveness of British prime ministers from 1902 to 2004. Research and Politics, 1(3), 1–8.Google Scholar

Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Rubenzer, S. J., Faschingbauer, T. R. and Ones, D. S. (2000). Assessing the US presidents using the revised NEO Personality Inventory. Assessment, 7(4), 403–419.Google Scholar

Sajons, G. B. (2020). Estimating the causal effect of measured endogenous variables: A tutorial on experimentally randomized instrumental variables. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(5), 1–17.Google Scholar

Schill, D. (2012). The visual image and the political image: A review of visual communication research in the field of political communication. Review of Communication, 12(2), 118–142.Google Scholar

Schneider, M. and Bos, A. (2014). Measuring stereotypes of female politicians. Political Psychology, 35(2), 245–266.Google Scholar

Schumacher, G. and Zettler, I. (2019). House of Cards or West Wing? Self-reported HEXACO traits of Danish politicians. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 173–181.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (2017). Individual values across cultures. In: Chuch, A. T. (Ed.) The Praeger handbook of personality across cultures. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2–3), 137–182.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(1), 1–65.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Bain, P., Bianchi, G., Caprara, M. G., Cieciuch, J., Kirmanoglu, H., Baslevent, C., Lönnqvist, J. E., Mamali, C., Manzi, J., Pavlopoulos, V., Posnova, T., Schoen, H., Silvester, J., Tabernero, C., Torres, C., Verkasalo, M., Vondráková, E., Welzel, C. and Zaleski, Z. (2014). Basic personal values underlie and give coherence to political values: A cross national study in 15 countries. Political Behavior, 36(4), 899–930.Google Scholar

Silvester, J. (2012). Recruiting politicians: Designing competency-based selection for UK parliamentary candidates. In Weinberg, A. (Ed.), The psychology of politicians (pp. 21–38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Silvester, J. (2008). The good, the bad and the ugly: Politics and politicians at work. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 23, 107–148.Google Scholar

Silvester, J. and Dykes, C. (2007). Selecting political candidates: A longitudinal study of assessment centre performance and political success in the 2005 UK General Election. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(1), 11–25.Google Scholar

Silvester, J. and Wyatt, M. (2018). Political effectiveness at work. In Ones, D. S., Anderson, N., Viswesvaran, C. and Sinangil, H. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology: V1: Personnel psychology and employee performance, 228–247. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Silvester, J., Wyatt, M., Ellen, B.P. III, and Ferris, G. R. (2020). Candidate effects on election outcomes: Political skill, campaign efficacy and intentions in a British general election. Applied Psychology: An International Review 1–41, doi.org/10.1111/apps.12292.Google Scholar

Silvester, J., Wyatt, M. and Randall, R. (2014). Politician personality, Machiavellianism, and political skill as predictors of performance ratings in political roles. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(2), 258–279.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2006). Presidential IQ, openness, intellectual brilliance, and leadership: Estimates and correlations for 42 US chief executives. Political Psychology, 27(4), 511–526.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1988). Presidential style: Personality, biography, and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(6), 928–936.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1986). Presidential personality: Biographical use of the Gough Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 149.Google Scholar

Spangler, W. D. and House, R. J. (1991). Presidential effectiveness and the leadership motive profile. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(3), 439.Google Scholar

Stiers, D., Larner, J., Kenny, J., Breitenstein, S., Vallée-Dubois, F. and Lewis-Beck, M. (2021). Candidate Authenticity: ‘To Thine Own Self Be True’. Political Behavior, 43, 1181–1204.Google Scholar

Stulp, G., Buunk, A. P., Verhulst, S. and Pollet, T. V. (2013). Tall claims? Sense and nonsense about the importance of height of US presidents. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 159–171.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P. (2010). The cognitive processing of politics and politicians: Archival studies of conceptual and integrative complexity. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1669–1702.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P., Cross, R. W. and Brcic, J. (2011). Two years of ups and downs: Barack Obama’s patterns of integrative complexity, motive imagery, and values. Political Psychology, 32(6), 1007–1033.Google Scholar

Sussman, A. B., Petkova, K. and Todorov, A. (2013). Competence ratings in US predict presidential election outcomes in Bulgaria. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 771–775.Google Scholar

Tetlock, P. E. (1984). Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(2), 365.Google Scholar

Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A. and Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308(5728), 1623–1626.Google Scholar

Treadway, D. C. (2012). Political will in organizations. In Ferris, G. R. and Treadway, D. C. (Eds.), Politics in organizations: Theory and research considerations: 531–556. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar

UN Women (2018). Facts and figures: Leadership and political participation. www.unwomen.org/en/what-we-do/leadership-and-political-participation/facts-andfigures. Accessed date: 2 July 2019.Google Scholar

Valgarðsson, V., Clarke, N., Jennings, W. and Stoker, G. (2020). The good politician and political trust: An authenticity gap in British politics? Political Studies. doi:10.1177/0032321720928257Google Scholar

Vecchione, M., Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Schoen, H., Cieciuch, J., Silvester, J., Bain, P., Bianchi, G., Kirmanoglu, H., Baslevent, C., Mamali, C., Manzi, J., Pavlopoulos, V., Posnova, T., Torres, C., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.‐E., Vondráková, E., Welzel, C. and Alessandri, G. (2015). Personal values and political activism: A cross‐national study. British Journal of Psychology, 106(1), 84–106.Google Scholar

Vivyan, N. and Wagner, M. (2015). What do voters want from their local MP? The Political Quarterly, 86(1), 33–40.Google Scholar

Wattenberg, M (1991). The rise of candidate-centered politics: Presidential elections of the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Winter, D. G. (2010). Why achievement motivation predicts success in business but failure in politics: The importance of personal control. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1637–1668.Google Scholar

Winter, D. G. (2003). Measuring the motives of political actors. In Post, J. (Ed.), The psychological assessment of political leaders (pp. 153–177). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Winter, D. G. (1987). Leader appeal, leader performance, and the motive profiles of leaders and followers: A study of American presidents and elections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 196–202.Google Scholar

Wyatt, M. and Silvester, J. (2018). Do voters get it right? A test of the ascription-actuality trait theory of leadership with political elites. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 609–621.Google Scholar

Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M. and Fraley, C. R. (2007). Voters’ personality traits in presidential elections. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1199–1208.Google Scholar

Bardi, A. and Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behaviour: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(10), 1207–1220.Google Scholar

Barenbaum, N. B. and Winter, D. G. (2008). History of modern personality theory and research. In John, O. P., Robins, R. W. and Pervin, L. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed.) (pp. 3–26). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Benoit, K. and Laver, M. (2006). Party policy in modern democracies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Best, H. (2011). Does personality matter in politics? Personality factors as determinants of parliamentary recruitment and policy preferences. Comparative Sociology, 10, 928–948.Google Scholar

Best, H. and Vogel, L. (2018). Representative elites. In Best, H., Daloz, J. P., and Hoffman-Lange, U.. (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of political elites (pp. 339–357). London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Bilsky, W., Janik, M. and Schwartz, S. H. (2011). The structural organization of human values-evidence from three rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(5), 759–776.Google Scholar

Binmore, K. (2009). Rational decisions. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Borg, I. (2019). Age- and gender-related differences in the structure and the meaning of personal values. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 336–343.Google Scholar

Caprara, G. V., Francescato, D., Mebane, M., Sorace, R. and Vecchione, M. (2010). Personality foundations of ideological divide: A comparison of women Members of Parliament and women voters in Italy. Political Psychology, 31, 739–762.Google Scholar

Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M. and Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice source. Political Psychology, 27(1), 1–28.Google Scholar

Caprara, G. V. and Zimbardo, P. (2004). Personalizing politics: A congruency model of political preference. American Psychologist, 59, 581–594.Google Scholar

Cervone, D. (2005). Personality architecture: Within-person structures and processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 423–452.Google Scholar

Cieciuch, J., Schwartz, S. H. and Vecchione, M. (2013). Applying the refined values theory to past data: What can researchers gain? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(8), 1215–1234.Google Scholar

Converse, P. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter, D. E. (Ed.). Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Cunningham, J. and Moore, M. K. (1997). Elite and mass foreign policy opinions: Who is leading this charade? Social Science Quarterly, 78(3), 641–656.Google Scholar

Dean, J. and Maiguashca, B. (2020). Did somebody say populism? Towards a renewal and reorientation of populism studies. Journal of Political Ideologies, 25(1), 11–27. doi: 10.1080/13569317.2020.1699712Google Scholar

Dye, T. R. and Ziegler, H. (1978). The irony of democracy. Boston, MA: Duxbury.Google Scholar

Federico, C. M. (2015). The structure, foundations, and expression of ideology. In Berinsky, A. (Ed.), New directions in public opinion (2nd ed.) (pp. 81–103). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Feldman, S. (2003). Values, ideology, and structure of political attitudes. In Sears, D. O., Huddy, L. and Jervis, R. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 477–508). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M. and Ha, S. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104, 111–133.Google Scholar

Hanania, R. (2017). The personalities of politicians: A Big Five study of American legislators. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 164–167.Google Scholar

Hatemi, P. K. and McDermott, R. (2011). Man is by nature a political animal: Evolution, biology and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Huddy, L., Sears, D. and Levy, J. (Eds.) (2013). Oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Johnston, C. D., Lavine, H. G. and Federico, C. M. (2017). Open versus closed: Personality, identity, and the politics of redistribution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Joly, J., Soroka, S. and Loewen, P. (2019) Nice guys finish last: Personality and political success, Acta Polit, 54, 667–683, doi:10.1057/s41269–018-0095-zGoogle Scholar

Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61, 651–670.Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M. and Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337.Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. and Sulloway, F. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.Google Scholar

Kelsen, H. (1992). Introduction to the problems of legal theory. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Kinder, D. R. (1998). Communication and opinion. Annual Review of Political Science, 1, 167–197.Google Scholar

Kinder, D. R. and Kalmoe, N. P. (2017). Neither liberal nor conservative: Ideological innocence in the American public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lavine, H., Johnston, C. and Steenbergen, M. (2012). The ambivalent partisan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Leeper, T. J. and Slothuus, R. (2014). Political parties, motivated reasoning, and public opinion formation. Political Psychology, 35(1), 129–156.Google Scholar

Lupia, A., McCubbins, M. and Popkin, S. L. (Eds.) (2000). Elements of reason. Cognition, choice and the bounds of rationality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

May, J. (1973). Opinion structure of political parties: The special law of curvilinear disparity. Political Studies, 21(2), 135–151.Google Scholar

McAdams, D. P. and Pals, J. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McCloskey, H. (1964). Consensus and ideology in American politics. American Political Science Review, 58, 361–382.Google Scholar

McGraw, K. M. (2000). Contributions of the cognitive approach to political psychology. Political Psychology, 27(4), 805–832.Google Scholar

Näsström, S. (2015). Democratic representation beyond election. Constellations, 22(1), 1–12. doi:10.1111/1467-8675.12123Google Scholar

Nørgaard, A. S. and Klemmensen, R. (2018). The personalities of Danish MPs: Trait- and aspect-level differences. Journal of Personality, 87(2), 267–275. doi:10.1111/jopy.12388Google Scholar

Opp, K. (2017). Rational choice theory and methodological individualism. In Kivisto, P. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of social theory (pp. 1–23). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pacheco, G. and Owen, B. (2015). Moving through the political participation hierarchy: A focus on personal values. Applied Economics, 47(3), 222–238.Google Scholar

Page, B. I. and Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 80, 1249–1270.Google Scholar

Parks-Leduc, L., Feldman, G. and Bardi, A. (2015). Personality traits and personal values: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(1), 3–29.Google Scholar

Peffley, M. and Rohrschneider, R. (2003). Democratization and political tolerance in seventeen countries: A multilevel model of democratic learning. Political Research Quarterly, 56(3), 243–257.Google Scholar

Piurko, Y., Schwartz, S. H. and Davidov, E. (2011). Basic personal values and the meaning of left-right political orientations in 20 countries, Political Psychology, 32, 537–561.Google Scholar

Riemann, R., Grubich, C., Hempel, S., Mergl, S. and Richter, M. (1993). Personality and attitudes towards current political topics. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 313–321.Google Scholar

Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Oppenheim, S., Elster, A. and Gal, A. (2014). Integrating content and structure aspects of the self: Traits, values, and self-improvement. Journal of Personality, 82(2), 144–157.Google Scholar

Sagiv, L. and Roccas, S. (2017). What personal values are and what they are not: Taking a cross-cultural perspective. In Roccas, S. and Sagiv, L. (Eds.), Values and behaviour: Taking a cross-cultural perspective (pp. 3–13). New York: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar

Sandy, C. J., Gosling, S. D., Schwartz, S. H. and Koelkebeck, T. (2017). The development and validation of brief and ultrabrief measures of values. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(5), 545–555.Google Scholar

Saroglou, V. and Munoz-Garcia, A. (2008). Individual differences in religion and spirituality: An issue of personality traits and/or values. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 43, 83–101.Google Scholar

Saward, M. (2010). The representative claim. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Saward, M. (2006). The representative claim. Contemporary Political Theory, 5(3), 297–318.Google Scholar

Schoen, H. and Schumann, S. (2007). Personality traits, partisan attitudes, and voting behaviour: Evidence from Germany. Political Psychology, 28, 471–498.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Zanna, M. (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M. and Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 519–542.Google Scholar

Scott, C. and Medeiros, M. (2020). Personality and political careers: What personality types are likely to run for office and get elected? Personality and Individual Differences, 152. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109600Google Scholar

Sniderman, P. M. (2000). Taking sides: A fixed choice theory of political reasoning. In Lupia, A., McCubbins, M. D. and Popkin, S. L. (Eds.), Elements of reason (pp. 1–20). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A. and Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and choice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sood, G. and Iyengar, S. (2014). All in the eye of the beholder: Partisan affect and ideological accountability. Unpublished manuscript [Online]. Available at: www.gsood.com/research/papers/inNout.pdf [Accessed: 14 February 2018].Google Scholar

Tiberj, K. and Kerrouche, E. (2013). Up and down, old and new: Values and value systems of MPs and voters in France. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 19(2), 160–177.Google Scholar

Vecchione, M., Schwartz, S., Caprara, G., Schoen, H., Cieciuch, J., Silvester, J., Bain, P., Bianchi, G., Kirmanoglu, H., Baslevent, C., Mamali, C., Manzi, J., Pavlopoulos, V., Posnova, T., Torres, C., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J., Vondráková, E., Welzel, C. and Alessandri, G. (2015). Personal values and political activism: A cross-national study. British Journal of Psychology, 106(1): 84–106.Google Scholar

Verplanken, B. and Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 434–47.Google Scholar

Weinberg, J. (2020a). Who wants to be a politician? Basic values and candidate emergence in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 1565–1581. doi:10.1017/S0007123419000814Google Scholar

Weinberg, J. (2020b). Who enters politics and why? Basic human values in the UK Parliament. Bristol: Bristol University Press.Google Scholar

Weinberg, J. (2019). The winner takes it all? A psychological study of political success among UK Members of Parliament. Parliamentary Affairs, 73(4), 711–733. doi:10.1093/pa/gsz017Google Scholar

Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Allen, B., Fox, R., Geis-King, I., Gibbons, V., Korris, M., Pavlova, P. and Raftery, M. (2014). Tuned in or turned off? Public attitudes to Prime Minister’s Questions. London: Hansard Society.Google Scholar

Bates, S. R., Kerr, P., Byrne, C. and Stanley, L. (2014). Questions to the Prime Minister: A comparative study of PMQs from Thatcher to Cameron. Parliamentary Affairs, 67, 253–280.Google Scholar

Bercow, J. (2010). Speech to the Centre for Parliamentary Studies. Retrieved from www.johnbercow.co.uk./content/speech-centre-parliamentary-studies.Google Scholar

Blair, T. (2010). A journey. London: Arrow Books.Google Scholar

BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation). (2008, 29 April). Cameron ‘unable to keep PMQs vow’. BBC News. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7372660.stm.Google Scholar

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody, E. N. (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56–289). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bull, P. (2013). The role of adversarial discourse in political opposition: Prime Minister’s questions and the British phone-hacking scandal. Language and Dialogue, 3, 254–272.Google Scholar

Bull, P. (2008). Slipperiness, evasion, and ambiguity: Equivocation and facework in noncommittal political discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 324–332.Google Scholar

Bull, P. (2003). The microanalysis of political communication: Claptrap and ambiguity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bull, P. (1994). On identifying questions, replies, and non-replies in political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13(2), 115–131.Google Scholar

Bull, P., Elliott, J., Palmer, D. and Walker, L. (1996). Why politicians are three-faced: The face model of political interviews. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 267–284.Google Scholar

Bull, P. and Fetzer, A. (2010). Face, facework and political discourse. International Review of Social Psychology, 23(2/3), 155–185.Google Scholar

Bull, P. and Mayer, K. (1993). How not to answer questions in political interviews. Political Psychology, 14(4), 651–666.Google Scholar

Bull, P. and Strawson, W. (2020). Can’t answer? Won’t answer? An analysis of equivocal responses by Theresa May in Prime Minister’s Questions. Parliamentary Affairs, 73(2), 429–449.Google Scholar

Bull, P. and Waddle, M. (2019). ‘Let me now answer, very directly, Marie’s question’: The impact of quoting members of the public in Prime Minister’s Questions. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 7(1), 56–78.Google Scholar

Bull, P. and Wells, P. (2012). Adversarial discourse in Prime Minister’s Questions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31, 30–48.Google Scholar

Chester, D. N. and Bowring, N. (1962). Questions in Parliament. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Clayman, S. E. (2001). Answers and evasions. Language in Society, 30(3), 403–442.Google Scholar

Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25 , 349–367.Google Scholar

Dunleavy, P., Jones, G. W., Burnham, J., Elgie, R. and Fysh, P. (1993). Leaders, politics and institutional change: The decline of prime ministerial accountability to the House of Commons, 1868–1990. British Journal of Political Science, 23 , 267–298.Google Scholar

Dunleavy, P., Jones, G. W. and O’Leary, B. (1990). Prime Ministers and the Commons: Patterns of behaviour, 1868 to 1987. Public Administration, 68 , 123–140.Google Scholar

Giddings, P. and Irwin, H. (2005). Objects and questions. In Giddings, P. (Ed.), The future of Parliament (pp. 67–77). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Gimson, A. (2012). PMQs: That’s the way to do it! British Journalism Review, 23, 11–13.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1967). Where the action is. In Goffman, E. (Ed.), Interaction ritual: Essays on face to face behaviour (pp. 149–270). New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

The Guardian. (2010, 14 October). Editorial: In praise of… prime minister’s questions. Retrieved from www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/oct/14/in-praise-of-prime-ministers-questions.Google Scholar

Harris, S. (2001). Being politically impolite: Extending politeness theory to adversarial political discourse. Discourse and Society, 12, 451–472.Google Scholar

Harris, S. (1991). Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews. In Scannell, P. (Ed.), Broadcast talk (pp. 76–99). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Hoggart, S. (2011, 14 December). Prime Minister’s Questions – or an unpleasant football match. The Guardian. Retrieved from www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/dec/14/prime-ministers-questions-football-match.Google Scholar

Hope, C. (2019, 1 May). Theresa May is most evasive Tory leader in past 50 years, scientific study finds. The Telegraph. Retrieved from www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/04/30/theresa-may-evasive-tory-leader-past-50-years-scientific-study/.Google Scholar

House of Commons Information Office. (2010a). Parliamentary Questions. (Factsheet P1, Procedure Series). Retrieved from www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-information-office/p01.pdf.Google Scholar

House of Commons Information Office. (2010b). Some Traditions and Customs of the House. (Factsheet G7, General Series). Retrieved from www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-information-office/g07.pdf.Google Scholar

House of Commons Procedure Committee (1995). Seventh Report of Session 1994–95, Prime Minister’s Questions, HC 555.Google Scholar

House of Commons Procedure Committee (1991). Third Report of Session 1990–91, Parliamentary Questions, HC 178.Google Scholar

Irwin, H. (1988). Opportunities for backbenchers. In Ryle, M. and Richards, P. G. (Eds.), The Commons under scrutiny (pp. 76–98). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Irwin, H., Kennon, A., Natzler, D. and Rogers, R. (1993). Evolving rules. In Franklin, M. and Norton, P. (Eds.), Parliamentary questions (pp. 23–72). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

ITV. (2015, 14 August). Jeremy Corbyn promises ‘new kind of politics’ as he unveils 10-point policy plan. ITV report. Retrieved from www.itv.com/news/2015-08-14/jeremy-corbyn-promises-new-kind-of-politics-as-he-unveils-10-point-policy-plan/.Google Scholar

John, P., Bertelli, A., Jennings, W. and Bevan, S. (2013). Policy agendas in British politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Lee, J. R. (1977). Rallying around the flag: Foreign policy events and presidential popularity. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 7, 252–256.Google Scholar

Norton, P. (1993). Introduction: Parliament since 1960. In Franklin, M. and Norton, P. (Eds.), Parliamentary questions (pp. 1–22). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Rasiah, P. (2010). A framework for the systematic analysis of evasion in parliamentary discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(3), 664–680.Google Scholar

Sedgemore, B. (1980). The secret constitution. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar

Thatcher, M. (1993). The Downing Street years. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Thomas, G. P. (2006). United Kingdom: The Prime Minister and Parliament. In Baldwin, N. D. J. (Ed.), Executive leadership and legislative assemblies (pp. 4–37). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Waddle, M. and Bull, P. (2020a). Curbing their antagonism: Topics associated with a reduction in personal attacks at Prime Minister’s Questions. Parliamentary Affairs, 73(3), 543–564.Google Scholar

Waddle, M. and Bull, P. (2020b). ‘You’re important, Jeremy, but not that important’: Personalised responses and equivocation in political interviews. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 8(2), 560–581.Google Scholar

Waddle, M., Bull, P. and Böhnke, J. R. (2019). ‘He is just the nowhere man of British politics’: Personal attacks in Prime Minister’s Questions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(1), 61–84.Google Scholar

Wilson, H. (1977). The governance of Britain. London: Sphere.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. and Sanford, N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper and Bros.Google Scholar

Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar

Baker-Brown, G., Ballard, E. J., Bluck, S., de Vries, B., Suedfeld, P. and Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The conceptual/integrative complexity scoring manual. In Smith, C. P. (Ed.), Motivation and personality: A handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 401–418). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Boyd-MacMillan, E. M. (2016). Increasing cognitive complexity and collaboration across communities: Being Muslim being Scottish. Journal of Strategic Security, 9(4), 53–78.Google Scholar

Boyd-MacMillan, E. M., Andrews Fearon, P., Ptolomey, A. M. and Mathieson, L. J. (2016). I SEE! Scotland: Tackling sectarianism and promoting community psychosocial health. Journal of Strategic Security, 9(4), 53–78.Google Scholar

Cassel, L., Cross, R., Ivanova, V., Jhangiani, R., Legkaia, K. and Suedfeld, P. (2007). Complexity and values of candidates. Clio’s Psyche, 14(3), 45–47.Google Scholar

Christie, R. and Jahoda, M. (Eds.) (1954). Studies in the scope and methods of ‘The Authoritarian Personality’. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar

Conway, L. G. III, Conway, K. R. and Houck, S. C. (2020). Validating automated integrative complexity: Natural language processing and the Donald Trump test. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 8(2), 502–524.Google Scholar

Conway, L. G. III, Gornick, L. J., Houck, S. C., Anderson, C., Stockert, J., Sessoms, D. and McCue, K. (2016). Are conservatives really more simple‐minded than liberals? The domain specificity of complex thinking. Political Psychology, 37(6), 777–798.Google Scholar

Conway, L. G. III, Gornick, L. J., Houck, S. C., Towgood, K. H. and Conway, K. R. (2011). The hidden implications of radical group rhetoric: Integrative complexity and terrorism. Journal of Asymmetric Conflict, 4(2), 155–165.Google Scholar

Conway, L. G. III, Houck, S. C., Gornick, L. J. and Repke, M. A. (2017). Finding the Loch Ness Monster: Left-Wing Authoritarianism in the United States. Political Psychology, 39(5), 1049–1067.Google Scholar

Conway, L. G. III, Thoemmes, F., Allison, A. M., Towgood, K. H., Wagner, M. J., Davey, K., Salcido, A., Stovall, A.N., Dodds, D.P., Bongard, K. and Conway, K. R. (2008). Two ways to be complex and why they matter: Implications for attitude strength and lying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1029–1044.Google Scholar

Coren, S. C. and Suedfeld, P. (1995). Personality correlates of conceptual complexity. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(1), 229–242.Google Scholar

Goldstein, K. M. and Blackman, S. (1978). Cognitive style: Five approaches and relevant research. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Goodfellow, S. (1992). From Communism to Nazism: The transformation of Alsatian Communists. Journal of Contemporary History, 27(2), 231–258.Google Scholar

Harvey, O. J., Hunt, D. E. and Schroder, H. M. (1961). Conceptual systems and personality organization. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Hermann, M. G. (2003). Assessing leadership style: Trait analysis. In Post, J. M. (Ed.), The psychological assessment of political leaders, with profiles of Saddam Hussein and Bill Clinton (pp. 178–212; separate chapters applying the method to the two leaders follow). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Joffee, J. (2020, 13 May). The coronavirus isn’t killing democracy. Tablet, accessed 17 June 2020 from www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/coronavirus-not-killing-democracy.Google Scholar

Koehler, D. (2020). Switching sides: Exploring violent extremist intergroup migration across hostile ideologies. Political Psychology, 41(3), 499–515.Google Scholar

Koehler, D. (2017). Understanding deradicalization: Methods, tools, and programs for countering violent extremism. Oxford, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lavallee, L. and Suedfeld, P. (1997). Conflict in Clayoquot Sound: Using thematic content analysis to understand psychological aspects of environmental controversy. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 29, 194–209.Google Scholar

Levi, A. and Tetlock, P. E. (1980). A cognitive analysis of Japan’s 1941 decision for war. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24(2), 195–211.Google Scholar

Nemr, C. and Savage, S. (2019). Integrative complexity interventions to prevent and counter violent extremism. Global Center on Cooperative Security. Accessed at: www.globalcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/GCCS-PB-IC-Interventions-Prevent-Counter-Violent-Extremism-2019.pdf.Google Scholar

Porter, C. A. and Suedfeld, P. (1981). Integrative complexity in the correspondence of literary figures: Effects of personal and societal stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 321–330.Google Scholar

Regt, S., Mortelmans, D. and Smits, T. (2011). Left-wing authoritarianism: Not a myth, but a worrisome reality: Evidence from 13 Eastern European countries. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 44(4), 299–308.Google Scholar

Riedel, B. (2020, 7 December). Jerrold Post: One of the CIA’s truly great innovators. Brookings, 7 December. Accessed at: www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2020/12/07/jerrold-post-one-of-the-cias-truly-great-innovators/.Google Scholar

Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Rothman, N. (2020). New Jersey’s coronavirus response is no “model.” Commentary, 6 August 2020. Accessed 12 August from www.commentarymagazine.com/noah-rothman/new-jerseys-coronavirus-response-is-no-model/.Google Scholar

Sales, S. M. (1972). Economic threat as a determinant of conversion in authoritarian and nonauthoritarian churches. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 420–428.Google Scholar

Savage, S. and Liht, J. (2008). Mapping fundamentalisms: The psychology of religion as a sub-discipline in the understanding of religiously motivated violence. Archiv für Religionspsychologie / Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 3, 75–91.Google Scholar

Schroder, H. M., Driver, M. J. and Streufert, A. (1967). Human information processing. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar

Schroder, H. M. and Suedfeld, P. (Eds.) (1971). Personality theory and information processing. New York: Ronald.Google Scholar

Selye, H. (1956). The stress of life. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Stone, W. F., Lederer, G. and Christie, R. (Eds.) (1993). Strength and weakness: The Authoritarian Personality today. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P. (2014). Political and military geniuses: Psychological profiles and responses to stress. In Simonton, D. K. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 244–265). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P. (2010). The cognitive processing of politics and politicians: Archival studies of conceptual and integrative complexity. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1669–1702.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P. (2000). Cognitive styles: Personality. In Kazdin, A. E. (Ed. in Chief), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 166–169). New York and Washington, DC: Oxford University Press and Amer. Psychological Assoc.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P. (1994). President Clinton’s policy dilemmas: A cognitive analysis. Political Psychology, 15, 337–349.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P. (1992a). Cognitive managers and their critics. Political Psychology, 13(3), 435–453.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P. (1992b). Bilateral relations between countries and the complexity of newspaper editorials. Political Psychology, 13(4), 601–611.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P. (1985). APA presidential addresses: The relation of integrative complexity to historical professional, and personal factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(60), 1643–1651.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P. (1983). Authoritarian leadership: A cognitive-interactionist view. In Held, J. (Ed.) The cult of power: Dictators in the twentieth century (pp. 1–22). Boulder, CO: East European Monographs.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P. (1981). Indices of world tension in The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Political Psychology, 2(3/4), 114–123.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P. and Ahmadian, S. (2018, July). Implicit markers of attitudes toward asylum-seekers. Presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P. and Bluck, S. (1993). Changes in integrative complexity accompanying significant life events: Historical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 124–130.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P., Bluck, S., Loewen, L. and Elkins, D. J. (1994). Sociopolitical values and integrative complexity of members of student political groups. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 26, 121–141.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P., Corteen, R. S. and McCormick, C. (1986). The role of integrative complexity in military leadership: Robert E. Lee and his opponents. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 498–507.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P., Cross, R. W. and Logan, C. (2013). Can thematic content analysis separate the pyramid of ideas from the pyramid of action? A comparison among different degrees of commitment to violence. In Cabayan, H., Sitterle, V. and Yandura, M. (Eds.), Looking back, looking forward: Perspectives on terrorism and responses to it (pp. 61–68). Washington, DC; Strategic Multilayer Assessment Occasional White Paper.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P. and Granatstein, J. L. (1995). Leader complexity in personal and professional crises: Concurrent and retrospective information processing. Political Psychology, 16(3), 509–522.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P., Morrison, B. H. and Kuznar, L. A. (2020). National interests and the meaning of ‘America First’. In Renshon, S. A. and Suedfeld, P. (Eds.), The Trump Doctrine and the emerging international system (pp. 39–70). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P. and Rank, D. A. (1976). Revolutionary leaders: Long-term success as a function of changes in conceptual complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 169–178.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P., Tetlock, P. E. and Jhangiani, R. (2007). The new psychology of alliances. In Renshon, S. A. and Suedfeld, P. (Eds.), Understanding the Bush Doctrine: Psychology and strategy in an age of terrorism (pp. 105–128). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Suedfeld, P., Tetlock, P. E. and Streufert, S. (1992). Conceptual/integrative complexity. In Smith, C. P. (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 393–400). Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Symposium on the scoring of integrative complexity. (2014). Political Psychology, 35(5), 597–659.Google Scholar

Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 819–827.Google Scholar

Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 74–83.Google Scholar

Tetlock, P. E., Armor, D. and Peterson, R. S. (1993). The slavery debate in antebellum America: Cognitive style, value conflict, and the limits of compromise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 115–126.Google Scholar

Tetlock, P. E., Peterson, R. S. and Berry, J. S. (1993). Flattering and unflattering personality portraits of integratively simple and complex managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 500–511.Google Scholar

Tetlock, P. E. and Tyler, A. (1996). Churchill’s cognitive and rhetorical style: The debates over Nazi intentions and self-government for India. Political Psychology, 17(1), 149–170.Google Scholar

Thoemmes, F. J. and Conway, L. G. III. (2007). Integrative complexity of 41 U.S. presidents. Political Psychology, 28(2), 193–226.Google Scholar

Wallace, M. D. and Suedfeld, P. (1988). Leadership performance in crisis: The longevity – complexity link. International Studies Quarterly, 32, 439–451.Google Scholar

Winter, D. G. (2007). The role of motivation, responsibility, and integrative complexity in crisis escalation: Comparative studies of war and peace crises. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 920–937.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, F. R. and Jones, B. D. (2015). The politics of information: Problem definition and the course of public policy in America. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bellur, S. and Sundar, S. S. (2014). How can we tell when a heuristic has been used? Design and analysis strategies for capturing the operation of heuristics. Communication Methods and Measures, 8(2), 116–137.Google Scholar

Besley, T. (2005). Political selection. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), 43–60.Google Scholar

Bovens, M. and Wille, A. (2017). Diploma democracy: The rise of political meritocracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M. and Morrow, J. D. (2003). The logic of political survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Byman, D. L. and Pollack, K. M. (2001). Let us now praise great men: Bringing the statesman back in. International Security, 25(4), 107–146.Google Scholar

Copeland, D. C. (2001). Theory and history in the study of major war. Security Studies, 10(4), 212–239.Google Scholar

Evans, J. S. B. T. and Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241.Google Scholar

Fatas, E., Neugebauer, T. and Tamborero, P. (2007). How politicians make decisions: A political choice experiment. Journal of Economics, 92(2), 167–196.Google Scholar

Fréchette, G. R. (20011). Laboratory experiments: Professionals versus student. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1939219 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1939219Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. and Selten, R. (Eds.) (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. and Kahneman, D. (Eds.) (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hafner-Burton, E. M., Alex Hughes, D. and Victor, D. G. (2013). The cognitive revolution and the political psychology of elite decision making. Perspectives on Politics, 11(2), 368–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592713001084Google Scholar

Hale, T., Webster, S., Petherick, A., Phillips, T. and Kira, B. (2020). Oxford COVID-19 government response tracker. Blavatnik School of Government. Available at: www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/research-projects/covid-19-government-response-tracker.Google Scholar

Hallsworth, M., Egan, M., Rutter, J. and McCrae, J. (2018). Behavioural government: Using behavioural science to improve how governments make decisions. London: The Behavioural Insights Team.Google Scholar

Heß, M., Scheve, C. von, Schupp, J. and Wagner, G. G. (2013). Members of German federal parliament more risk-loving than general population. SOEP Papers 546. Accessed at: www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.418993.de/diw_sp0546.pdf.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. and Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., and Kahneman, D. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–193.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430–454.Google Scholar

Kelman, M. (2011). The heuristics debate. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kertzer, J. D. (2020). Re-assessing elite-public gaps in political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12583Google Scholar

Linde, J. and Vis, B. (2017). Do politicians take risks like the rest of us? An experimental test of prospect theory under MPs. Political Psychology, 38(1), 101–117.Google Scholar

List, J. A. (2004). Neoclassical theory versus prospect theory: Evidence from the marketplace. Econometrica, 72(2), 615–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00502.xGoogle Scholar

Mattozzi, A. and Merlo, A. (2008). Political careers or career politicians? Journal of Public Economics, 92(3–4), 597–608.Google Scholar

Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties (2016). Staat van het Bestuur. Available at: https://kennisopenbaarbestuur.nl/media/254488/staat-van-het-bestuur-2016-webrichtlijnenproof.pdf.Google Scholar

Mintz, A., Redd, S. B. and Vedlitz, A. (2006). Can we generalize from student experiments to the real world in political science, military affairs, and international relations? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(5), 757–776.Google Scholar

Newell, B. R., Lagnado, D. A. and Shanks, D. R. (2015). Straight choices: The psychology of decision making (2nd ed.). Hove and New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Rahat, G. (2007). Candidate selection: The choice before the choice. Journal of Democracy, 18(1), 157–170.Google Scholar

Renshon, J. (2015). Losing face and sinking costs: Experimental evidence on the judgment of political and military leaders. International Organization, 69(3), 659–695.Google Scholar

Sheffer, L. (2018). Behavioural foundations of elite politics: How individual-level characteristics shape the decision making of elected politicians. PhD Dissertation: University of Toronto.Google Scholar

Sheffer, L., Loewen, P. J., Soroka, S., Walgrave, S. and Shaefer, T. (2018). Nonrepresentative representatives: An experimental study of the decision making of elected politicians. American Political Science Review, 112(2), 302–321.Google Scholar

Simonson, I. and Tversky, A. (1992). Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 231–295.Google Scholar

Stolwijk, S. (2019). The representativeness heuristic in political decision making. In Redlawsk, D. P., Erisen, C., Hennes, E., Oxley, Z., Schreiber, D. and Vis, B. (Eds.), The Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Available at: https://oxfordre.com/politics/browse?page=60&pageSize=20&sort=authorsort&subSite=politics.Google Scholar

Stolwijk, S. and Vis, B. (2020). Politicians, the representativeness heuristic and decision-making Biases. Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09594-6Google Scholar

Stolwijk, S. and Vis, B. (2018). Political decision making and the availability heuristic. Paper prepared for the seventy-sixth Annual MPSA Conference, Chicago, USA, 5–8 April.Google Scholar

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90(4), 293–315.Google Scholar

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.Google Scholar

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232.Google Scholar

Tversky, A. and Simonson, I. (1993). Context-dependent preferences. Management Science, 39(10), 1179–1189.Google Scholar

Vieider, F. and Vis, B. (2019). Prospect theory in political decision making. In Redlawsk, D., Erisen, C., Hennes, E., Oxley, Z., Schreiber, D. and Vis, B. (Eds.), Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Available at: https://oxfordre.com/politics/browse?page=60&pageSize=20&sort=authorsort&subSite=politics.Google Scholar

Vis, B. (2019). Heuristics and political elites’ judgment and decision making. Political Studies Review, 17(1), 41–52.Google Scholar

Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Walgrave, S., Epping, L. and Sevenan, J. (2013). Het Informatiemenu van politici en hun medewerkers: Resultaten van Interviews met Federale Parlementsleden, Ministers, Partijvoorzitters en hun Persoonlijke Medewerkers. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.Google Scholar

All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Mental Health (2008). Mental health in Parliament. Report by the APPG on Mental Health.Google Scholar

British Psychological Society (BPS) (2020). Cognitive strain in Parliament: How can we reduce psychological stressors to improve policy-making? By Baldwin, A., Pinto, C., Perriard-Abdoh, S and Weinberg, A. Available at: www.bps.org.uk/sites/www.bps.org.uk/files/Policy/Policy%20-%20Files/Cognitive%20strain%20in%20Parliament.pdf.Google Scholar

British Psychological Society (BPS) (2017). Psychology at Work: Improving wellbeing and productivity in the workplace. By Weinberg, A. and Doyle, N. Available at: www.bps.org.uk/news-and-policy/psychology-work-improving-wellbeing-and-productivity-workplace.Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Burns, R. A., Butterworth, P. and Anstey, K. J. (2016). An examination of the long-term impact of job strain on mental health and wellbeing over a 12-year period. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology: The International Journal for Research in Social and Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health Services, 51(5), 725–733.Google Scholar

Butterworth, P., Leach, L. S., McManus, S. and Stansfeld, S. A. (2013). Common mental disorders, unemployment and psychosocial job quality: Is a poor job better than no job at all? Psychological Medicine, 43(8), 1763–1772.Google Scholar

Caplan, R. D., Cobb, S., French, J. R. P. Jr, Harrison, R. V. and Pinneau, S. R. Jr. (1975). Job demands and work health. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, NIOSH Publication No. 75–160. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Cooper-Thomas, H. and Silvester, J. (2014). Ideas and advice to accelerate the transition for new MPs entering New Zealand’s House of Representatives. Available at: https://margf2011.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/report-to-support-new-mp-adjustment-final.pdf.Google Scholar

Cox, L. (2018). The bullying and harassment of House of Commons staff. Independent inquiry report. Available from: www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/conduct-in-parliament/dame-laura-cox-independent-inquiry-report.pdf.Google Scholar

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F. and Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands – resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499–512.Google Scholar

Emery, L., Meier, P. and Mortelmans, D. (2018). Juggling three life spheres: Reconciling work, family and politics. Community, Work & Family, 21(2), 226–242.Google Scholar

Every-Palmer, S., Barry-Walsh, J. and Pathé, M. (2015). Harassment, stalking, threats and attacks targeting New Zealand politicians: A mental health issue. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 49(7), 634–641.Google Scholar

Fazekas, Z. and Hatemi, P. K. (2020) Narcissism in political participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. doi.org/10.1177/0146167220919212Google Scholar

Flinders, M. and Kelso, A. (2011), Mind the gap: Political analysis, public expectations and the parliamentary decline thesis. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 13, 249–268.Google Scholar

Flinders, M., Weinberg, A., Weinberg, J., Geddes, M. and Kwiatkowski, R. (2020). Governing under pressure? The mental wellbeing of politicians. Parliamentary Affairs, 73(2), 253–273.Google Scholar

Freeman, H. (1991). The human brain and political behaviour. British Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 19–32.Google Scholar

Ghana News (2017). MP wants counseling office for parliamentarians. 17 March. Available at: http://3news.com/mp-wants-counseling-office-for-parliamentarians/.Google Scholar

Goldberg, D. and Williams, D. (1988). General Health Questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar

Hansard (2012). Mental health. Available at: https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-06-14/debates/12061445000002/MentalHealth.Google Scholar

Hartley, J. (2012). Political leadership and its development. In Weinberg, A. (Ed.), The psychology of politicians (pp. 97–120). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hassard, J., Teoh, K. R. H., Visockaite, G., Dewe, P. and Cox, T. (2018). The cost of work-related stress to society. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(1), 1–17.Google Scholar

Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: The commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Ignatieff, M. (2013). Fire and ashes: Success and failure in politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Jahoda, M. (1982). Employment and unemployment: A social-psychological analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jopling Report (1992). Report from the Select Committee on sittings of the House, vol.1. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285–308.Google Scholar

Karasek, R. A. and Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Kenyan Ministry for Health (2019). Kenya launches Quality Rights Initiative to promote mental health care. Available at: www.health.go.ke/kenya-launches-qualityrights-initiative-to-promote-mental-health-care/.Google Scholar

Kwiatkowski, R. (2012). Politicians and power: MPs in the UK Parliament. In Weinberg, A. (Ed.), The psychology of politicians (pp. 39–58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lilienfeld, S., Waldman, I., Landfield, K., Watts, A., Rubenzer, S. and Faschingbauer, T. (2012). ‘Fearless dominance and the US presidency, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 489–505.Google Scholar

Malenga, M. (2019). The work-life balance of an MP in Malawi. The Work-Life Balance Bulletin, 3(1). Leicester: BPS Division of Occupational Psychology.Google Scholar

Malenga, M. (2016). An exploration of occupational stress among Members of Parliament: A case of parliamentarians in Malawi. Unpublished thesis, Africa University of Guidance, Counselling and Youth Development.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. (1859/1983) On liberty (Reprinted). Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar

Mindful Nation (2015). Mindful Nation UK. Report by the Mindfulness All-Party Parliamentary Group. Available at: www.themindfulnessinitiative.org/mindful-nation-report.Google Scholar

Owen, D. and Davidson, J. (2009). Hubris Syndrome. Brain, 132, 1396–1406.Google Scholar

Paul, K. I. and Moser, K. (2009). Unemployment impairs mental health: Meta-analyses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 264–282.Google Scholar

Poulter, D., Votruba, N., Bakolis, I., Debell, F., Das-Munshi, J. and Thornicroft, G. (2019). Mental health of UK Members of Parliament in the House of Commons: A cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 2019;9:e027892. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027892Google Scholar

Robb, A. (2011). Black dog daze: Public life, private demons. Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, J. (2017). Losing political office. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Royal College of Psychiatrists (2020). Depression in adults. Available at: www.rcpsych.ac.uk/mental-health/problems-disorders/depression.Google Scholar

Silvester, J. and Dykes, C. (2007). Selecting political candidates: A longitudinal study of assessment centre performance and political success in the 2005 UK General Election. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(1), pp. 11–25.Google Scholar

Silvester, J., Wyatt, M. and Randall, R. (2013). Politician personality, Machiavellianism, and political skill as predictors of performance ratings in political roles. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(2), pp. 258–279.Google Scholar

Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) (2019). Underused EAPs are a missed opportunity to help workers. Available at: www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/benefits/pages/under-used-eaps-are-a-missed-opportunity.aspx.Google Scholar

Sutherland, D. (2019). Mental health wins record funding in New Zealand’s first ‘well-being budget’. Available at: https://theconversation.com/mental-health-wins-record-funding-in-new-zealands-first-well-being-budget-118047.Google Scholar

Theakston, K. (2012). Life after political death, Representation, 48(2), 139–149.Google Scholar

van Horn, J. E., Taris, T., Schaufeli, W. B. and Schreurs, P. J. G. (2004). The structure of occupational well-being: A study among Dutch teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(3), 365–375.Google Scholar

Warr, P. (1989). Work, unemployment and mental health. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Watts, A. L., Lilienfeld, S. O., Smith, S. F., Miller, D. J., Campbell, W. K., Waldman, I. D., Rubenzer, S. J. and Faschingbauer, T. J., (2013). The double-edged sword of grandiose narcissism: Implications for successful and unsuccessful leadership among US Presidents. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2379–2389.Google Scholar

Weinberg, A. (2015). A longitudinal study of the impact of changes in the job and the expenses scandal on UK national politicians’ experiences of work, stress and the home-work interface. Parliamentary Affairs, 68(2), 248–271.Google Scholar

Weinberg, A. (2012). Should the job of national politician carry a government health warning? The impact of psychological strain on politicians. In Weinberg, A., A. (Ed.), The psychology of politicians, pp. 123–142. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Weinberg, A. (2007). Your destiny in their hands: Job loss and success in Members of Parliament. British Psychological Society annual conference, York. Proceedings of the BPS, 15(2), 135.Google Scholar

Weinberg, A. and Cooper, C. L. (2003). Stress among national politicians elected to Parliament for the first time. Stress and Health, 19, 111–117.Google Scholar

Weinberg, A., Cooper, C. L. and Weinberg, A. (1999). Workload, stress and family life in British Members of Parliament and the psychological impact of reforms to their working hours. Stress Medicine, 15, 79–87.Google Scholar

Weinberg, J. (2020). Emotional labour and occupational wellbeing in political office. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120959044Google Scholar

Weinberg, J. and Weinberg, A. (2019). The mental health of politicians: Testing the parameters (poster presentation). Annual conference of International Society for Political Psychology, Berlin.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2020). Global challenge for movement on mental health kicks off as lack of investment in mental health leaves millions without access to services. Available at: www.who.int/news/item/07-10-2020-global-challenge-for-movement-on-mental-health-kicks-off-as-lack-of-investment-in-mental-health-leaves-millions-without-access-to-services.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2018). Mental health: Strengthening our response. Available at: www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2011). Impact of economic crises on mental health. Available at: www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/134999/e94837.pdf.Google Scholar

Wrzesniewski, A. and Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 25, 179–201.Google Scholar