Literary Creativity and Physiognomy: Expressiveness in Writers, Readers, and Literature

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511627101.009

7 - Literary Creativity and Physiognomy: Expressiveness in Writers, Readers, and Literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2010

Martin S. Lindauer

Edited by

Scott Barry Kaufman and

James C. Kaufman

Show author details

Scott Barry Kaufman: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
James C. Kaufman: Affiliation:
California State University, San Bernardino

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Psychology views the rather unusual phenomenon of physiognomy somewhat warily if not disparagingly (Lindauer, 1984a). To justify my coverage of this controversial (and misunderstood) topic and to validate its inclusion in a discussion of literary creativity, I digress at the outset to explain my focus on the creative literary work – the literary stimulus, “the word” – rather than, as is often the case, the creative author (Lindauer, 1984c). The stage is further set with examples that clarify the complex nature of physiognomy, followed by a brief coverage of related definitional matters, methods of study, history, and theory. After these preliminary yet important considerations, I turn to the main focus of this chapter, the role of physiognomy in literature, but not before setting it within its larger place in the arts generally. Following my argument that physiognomy not only bears on literary works but also on creative authors and receptive readers, I conclude with some suggested studies.

PRELIMINARY MATTERS: SETTING THE STAGE

The Creativity of the Work

The creativity of writers – or for that matter anyone who is creative – is not just about particular individuals and such personal matters as the role of childhood experiences, family relationships, and emotional conflicts. It also depends, in the specific case of authors, on the judgments of readers (experts, critics, reviewers, the public) and the nature of the literary work (imagery and metaphors, characterization and plot development, stylistic features, use of language).

Type: Chapter
Information: The Psychology of Creative Writing , pp. 117 - 130

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627101.009 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahsen, A. (1982). Principles of imagery in art and literature. Journal of Mental Imagery, 6, 213–250.Google Scholar

Alley, T. R. (Ed.). (1988). Social and applied aspects of perceiving faces. Resources for ecological psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Arcamore, A., & Lindauer, M. S. (1974). Concept learning and the identification of poetic style. Psychological Reports, 35, 207–210.Google Scholar

Arnheim, R. (1948). Psychological notes on the poetical process. In Arnheim, R., Auden, W. H., & Stouffer, D. A. (Eds.), Poets at work (pp. 125–162). New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

Arnheim, R. (1966). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Arnheim, R. (1970). Words and their place. Journal of Typographic Research, 4, 199–212.Google Scholar

Arnheim, R. (1972). The Gestalt theory of expression. In Arnheim, R. (Ed.), Toward a psychology of art: Collected essays (pp. 51–73). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye (the new version). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Arnheim, R. (1984). Visual aspects of concrete poetry. In Strelka, J. O. (Ed.), Literary criticism and psychology (pp. 91–109). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Bilotta, J., Guare, J., & Lindauer, M. S. (1981). The relationship between field-independence/dependence, creativity, and physiognomy among men and women. JSAS Selected Documents in Psychology, 1, 2287.Google Scholar

Comalli, P. E. (1960). Studies in physiognomic perception. VI. Differential effects of directional dynamics of pictured objects on real and apparent motion in artists and chemist. Journal of Psychology, 49, 99–109.CrossRef Google Scholar

Comalli, P. E., Werner, H., & Wapner, S. (1952). Studies in physiognomic perception: III. Effect of directional dynamics and meaning-induced sets on autokinetic motions. Journal of Psychology, 43, 2898–2899.Google Scholar

Dailey, A., Martindale, C., & Borkum, J. (1997). Creativity, synesthesia and physiognomic perception. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 1–8.CrossRef Google Scholar

Danow, D. K. (1984). Physiognomy: The codeless science. Semiotica, 50, 15–171.Google Scholar

Dufrenne, M. (1973/1953). The phenomenology of aesthetic experience. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Edel, L. (1955). The modern psychological novel. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, J. B. (1981). Another look at Chaucer and the physiognomists. Studies in Philology, 78, 138–152.Google Scholar

Gombrich, E. H. (1960, Winter). On physiognomic perception. Daedalus, 228–242.Google Scholar

Gombrich, E. H. (1972). The mask and the face: The perception of physiognomic likenesses in life and art. In Gombrich, E. H., Hochberg, J., & Bloch, M. (Eds.), Art, perception, and reality (pp. 30–45). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Gostin, L. O., & Lindauer, M. S. (1973). Autokinesis for meaningful stimuli and the effect of set. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 36, 979–986.Google Scholar

Greenauer, M., & Lindauer, M. S. (1981). Physiognomic properties of positive and negative stimuli among five-year old children (Report No. PS102 417). East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning (ERIC Document Reproductive Service. No. ED206 416).

Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar

Lindauer, M. S. (1970a). Physiognomic properties of abstract art and titles. Proceedings of the 78th Annual Convention APA, 5, 493–494.Google Scholar

Lindauer, M. S. (1970b). Psychological aspects of form perception in abstract art. Science de l'Art, 7, 19–24.Google Scholar

Lindauer, M. S. (1972). The sensory attributes and functions of imagery and imagery evoking stimuli. In Sheehan, P. W. (Ed.), The function and nature of imagery (pp. 131–147). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Lindauer, M. S. (1975). The psychological study of literature. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar

Lindauer, M. S. (1977). Imagery from the point of view of psychological aesthetics, the arts, and creativity. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1, 343–362.Google Scholar

Lindauer, M. S. (1983). Imagery and the arts. In Sheikh, A. A. (Ed.), Imagery: Current theory, research, and applications (pp. 468–506). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Lindauer, M. S. (1984a). Physiognomic perception. In Corsini, R. J. (Ed.), Wiley encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 1., pp. 34–35). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Lindauer, M. S. (1984b). Physiognomy and art: Approaches from above, below, and sideways. Visual Arts Research, 10, 52–65.Google Scholar

Lindauer, M. S. (1984c). Psychology and literature. In Bornstein, M. H. (Ed.), Psychology and its allied disciplines (pp. 113–l54). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Lindauer, M. S. (1986). Perceiving, imaging, and preferring the colors of physiognomic stimuli. American Journal of Psychology, 99, 233–255.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lindauer, M. S. (1987). Physiognomic perception. In Corsini, R. J. (Ed.), Wiley encyclopedia of psychology (condensed version, pp. 398–399). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Lindauer, M. S. (1988a). Physiognomic meanings in the titles of short stories. In Martindale, C. (Ed.), Psychological approaches to the study of literary narratives (pp. 74–95) Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar

Lindauer, M. S. (1988b). Size and distance perception of the physiognomic stimulus “taketa.”Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 217–220.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lindauer, M. S. (1990a). The effects of the physiognomic stimuli taketa and maluma on the meanings of neutral stimuli. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 151–154.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lindauer, M. S. (1990b). The meanings of the physiognomic stimuli taketa and maluma. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 47–50.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lindauer, M. S. (1991a). Physiognomic expression in literary materials: Bridging the humanities and science. Paper presented at the Society for Science and Literature Conference, Montreal, October.Google Scholar

Lindauer, M. S. (1991b). Physiognomy and verbal synesthesia: Affective and sensory descriptions of nouns with drawings and art. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 6, 183–202.CrossRef Google Scholar

Magliola, R. R. (1972). The phenomenological approach to literature: Its theory and methodology. Language and Style, 5, 79–99.Google Scholar

Marks, L. E. (1975). On colored-hearing synesthesia: Cross-modal translations of sensory dimensions. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 303–331.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Marks, L. E. (1978). The unity of the senses: Interrelations among the modalities. New York: Academic Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Marks, L. E. (1982). Synesthetic and poetic metaphor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Perception and Performance, 8, 15–23.Google Scholar PubMed

McKellar, P. (1968). Experience and behavior. Baltimore: Penguin.Google Scholar

McKellar, P. (1997). Synaesthesia and imagery: Fantasia revisited. Journal of Mental Imagery, 21, 41–54.Google Scholar

Rhodes, G., & Zebrowitz, L. A. (Eds.). (2002). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives. Advances in visual cognition (Vol. 1). Westport, CT: Ablex.

Stein, M. I. (1975). The Physiognomic Cue Test. New York: Behavioral Publications.Google Scholar

Tytler, G. (1982). Physiognomy in the European novel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Werner, H. (1948). Comparative psychology of mental development. New York: International Universities Press. (Original work published 1926)Google Scholar

Werner, H. (1952). On physiognomic perception. In Kepes, G. (Ed.), The new landscape in art and science (pp. 280–282). Chicago: Paul Theobald.Google Scholar

Werner, H. (Ed.). (1955). On expressive behavior. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.