Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- PART I THE WRITER
- PART II THE TEXT
- 6 The Evolution of Creative Writing
- 7 Literary Creativity and Physiognomy: Expressiveness in Writers, Readers, and Literature
- 8 The Literary Genius of William Shakespeare: Empirical Studies of His Dramatic and Poetic Creativity
- PART III THE PROCESS
- PART IV THE DEVELOPMENT
- PART V THE EDUCATION
- Index
- References
7 - Literary Creativity and Physiognomy: Expressiveness in Writers, Readers, and Literature
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2010
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- PART I THE WRITER
- PART II THE TEXT
- 6 The Evolution of Creative Writing
- 7 Literary Creativity and Physiognomy: Expressiveness in Writers, Readers, and Literature
- 8 The Literary Genius of William Shakespeare: Empirical Studies of His Dramatic and Poetic Creativity
- PART III THE PROCESS
- PART IV THE DEVELOPMENT
- PART V THE EDUCATION
- Index
- References
Summary
Psychology views the rather unusual phenomenon of physiognomy somewhat warily if not disparagingly (Lindauer, 1984a). To justify my coverage of this controversial (and misunderstood) topic and to validate its inclusion in a discussion of literary creativity, I digress at the outset to explain my focus on the creative literary work – the literary stimulus, “the word” – rather than, as is often the case, the creative author (Lindauer, 1984c). The stage is further set with examples that clarify the complex nature of physiognomy, followed by a brief coverage of related definitional matters, methods of study, history, and theory. After these preliminary yet important considerations, I turn to the main focus of this chapter, the role of physiognomy in literature, but not before setting it within its larger place in the arts generally. Following my argument that physiognomy not only bears on literary works but also on creative authors and receptive readers, I conclude with some suggested studies.
PRELIMINARY MATTERS: SETTING THE STAGE
The Creativity of the Work
The creativity of writers – or for that matter anyone who is creative – is not just about particular individuals and such personal matters as the role of childhood experiences, family relationships, and emotional conflicts. It also depends, in the specific case of authors, on the judgments of readers (experts, critics, reviewers, the public) and the nature of the literary work (imagery and metaphors, characterization and plot development, stylistic features, use of language).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Psychology of Creative Writing , pp. 117 - 130Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
(1982). Principles of imagery in art and literature. Journal of Mental Imagery, 6, 213–250.Google Scholar
(Ed.). (1988). Social and applied aspects of perceiving faces. Resources for ecological psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
, & (1974). Concept learning and the identification of poetic style. Psychological Reports, 35, 207–210.Google Scholar
(1948). Psychological notes on the poetical process. In , , & (Eds.), Poets at work (pp. 125–162). New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
(1966). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1972). The Gestalt theory of expression. In (Ed.), Toward a psychology of art: Collected essays (pp. 51–73). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye (the new version). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1984). Visual aspects of concrete poetry. In (Ed.), Literary criticism and psychology (pp. 91–109). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
, , & (1981). The relationship between field-independence/dependence, creativity, and physiognomy among men and women. JSAS Selected Documents in Psychology, 1, 2287.Google Scholar
(1960). Studies in physiognomic perception. VI. Differential effects of directional dynamics of pictured objects on real and apparent motion in artists and chemist. Journal of Psychology, 49, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & (1952). Studies in physiognomic perception: III. Effect of directional dynamics and meaning-induced sets on autokinetic motions. Journal of Psychology, 43, 2898–2899.Google Scholar
, , & (1997). Creativity, synesthesia and physiognomic perception. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1973/1953). The phenomenology of aesthetic experience. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
(1981). Another look at Chaucer and the physiognomists. Studies in Philology, 78, 138–152.Google Scholar
(1972). The mask and the face: The perception of physiognomic likenesses in life and art. In , , & (Eds.), Art, perception, and reality (pp. 30–45). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
, & (1973). Autokinesis for meaningful stimuli and the effect of set. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 36, 979–986.Google Scholar
, & (1981). Physiognomic properties of positive and negative stimuli among five-year old children (Report No. PS102 417). East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning (ERIC Document Reproductive Service. No. ED206 416).
(1970a). Physiognomic properties of abstract art and titles. Proceedings of the 78th Annual Convention APA, 5, 493–494.Google Scholar
(1970b). Psychological aspects of form perception in abstract art. Science de l'Art, 7, 19–24.Google Scholar
(1972). The sensory attributes and functions of imagery and imagery evoking stimuli. In (Ed.), The function and nature of imagery (pp. 131–147). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1977). Imagery from the point of view of psychological aesthetics, the arts, and creativity. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1, 343–362.Google Scholar
(1983). Imagery and the arts. In (Ed.), Imagery: Current theory, research, and applications (pp. 468–506). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
(1984a). Physiognomic perception. In (Ed.), Wiley encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 1., pp. 34–35). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
(1984b). Physiognomy and art: Approaches from above, below, and sideways. Visual Arts Research, 10, 52–65.Google Scholar
(1984c). Psychology and literature. In (Ed.), Psychology and its allied disciplines (pp. 113–l54). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(1986). Perceiving, imaging, and preferring the colors of physiognomic stimuli. American Journal of Psychology, 99, 233–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1987). Physiognomic perception. In (Ed.), Wiley encyclopedia of psychology (condensed version, pp. 398–399). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
(1988a). Physiognomic meanings in the titles of short stories. In (Ed.), Psychological approaches to the study of literary narratives (pp. 74–95) Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
(1988b). Size and distance perception of the physiognomic stimulus “taketa.”Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 217–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990a). The effects of the physiognomic stimuli taketa and maluma on the meanings of neutral stimuli. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 151–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990b). The meanings of the physiognomic stimuli taketa and maluma. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 47–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991a). Physiognomic expression in literary materials: Bridging the humanities and science. Paper presented at the Society for Science and Literature Conference, Montreal, October.Google Scholar
(1991b). Physiognomy and verbal synesthesia: Affective and sensory descriptions of nouns with drawings and art. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 6, 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1972). The phenomenological approach to literature: Its theory and methodology. Language and Style, 5, 79–99.Google Scholar
(1975). On colored-hearing synesthesia: Cross-modal translations of sensory dimensions. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 303–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1978). The unity of the senses: Interrelations among the modalities. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982). Synesthetic and poetic metaphor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Perception and Performance, 8, 15–23.Google ScholarPubMed
(1997). Synaesthesia and imagery: Fantasia revisited. Journal of Mental Imagery, 21, 41–54.Google Scholar
, & (Eds.). (2002). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives. Advances in visual cognition (Vol. 1). Westport, CT: Ablex.
(1982). Physiognomy in the European novel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1948). Comparative psychology of mental development. New York: International Universities Press. (Original work published 1926)Google Scholar
(1952). On physiognomic perception. In (Ed.), The new landscape in art and science (pp. 280–282). Chicago: Paul Theobald.Google Scholar
(Ed.). (1955). On expressive behavior. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
- 2
- Cited by