Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:00:51.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Debriefing and body recovery: war grave soldiers

from Part II - Debriefing: models, research and practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

Beverley Raphael
Affiliation:
New South Wales Health Department, Sydney
John Wilson
Affiliation:
Cleveland State University
Get access

Summary

EDITORIAL COMMENTS

Combat and its effects are well established as stressors, but the particular aspects of the roles of certain groups of soldiers need further research. This chapter reviews what is known about the psychological impact of body recovery, and in particular the possible effects on soldiers whose role it is to recover the bodies of colleagues or those of the enemy. Deahl's research and understanding of this field is clearly heightened by his own experience of body recovery after the Kings Cross Underground Wre in London. The special issues faced by soldiers who may recover bodies in situations of ongoing threat and factors that may mitigate the impact are the subject of this chapter.

A fortuitous naturalistic opportunity for research arose when two groups of soldiers could be compared: one had had debriefing; the other for operational reasons had not. The study found that debriefing did not mitigate the psychological distress experienced, which was very similar in the two groups. Factors that predicted ongoing distress included the degree of perceived threat experienced by the soldiers, and this was negatively correlated with previous ‘real-life experience’ of handling body remains. Past psychological problems also increased vulnerability, and only a small number had sought specialist help. Negative impact of this psychological morbidity on personal relationships was also found, indicating the significance of the morbidity described.

Type
Chapter
Information
Psychological Debriefing
Theory, Practice and Evidence
, pp. 108 - 117
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×