Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:36:16.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2009

By
Oguz Akin
Edited by
Hedvig Hricak  and
Peter Scardino
Hedvig Hricak
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Peter Scardino
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most useful imaging methods for the non-invasive evaluation of prostate cancer. The prostate and periprostatic structures can be depicted with excellent soft-tissue resolution with MRI, allowing assessment of the local extent of disease. Currently, the role of MRI in prostate cancer is evolving to improve disease detection and staging, to determine the aggressiveness of disease, and to optimize individualized treatment planning and follow-up.

This article reviews the role of MRI in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer, from diagnosis to post-treatment follow-up. Specific imaging features of prostate cancer as seen on MR imaging are described, and the advantages, limitations, and clinically relevant uses of various MRI techniques are discussed.

Magnetic resonance imaging techniques

A magnetic field strength of at least 1.5 Tesla (T) is required for a high-quality MRI study of the prostate. A magnetic field strength of 3 T provides a greater signal-to-noise ratio that allows higher resolution imaging. The advantages of higher resolution imaging are the detection of small tumors and more accurate local staging.

The use of an endorectal coil with a pelvic phased-array coil markedly improves image quality and is recommended. Magnetic resonance imaging parameters applied in prostate imaging depend on the type of MRI system used and the field strength. In general, T1-weighted transverse images of the entire pelvis are obtained for the assessment of post-biopsy hemorrhage in the prostate, pelvic lymph nodes, and bones.

Type
Chapter
Information
Prostate Cancer , pp. 140 - 157
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Claus, F. G., Hricak, H., Hattery, R. R., Pretreatment evaluation of prostate cancer: role of MR imaging and 1H MR spectroscopy. Radiographics, 24 (2004), S167–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akin, O., Sala, E., Moskowitz, C. S., et al., Transition zone prostate cancers: features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging. Radiology, 239 (2006), 784–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, H., Sugimura, K., Kaji, Y., et al., Conventional MRI capabilities in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in the transition zone. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 186 (2006), 729–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Y. J., Kim, J. K., Kim, N., et al., Functional MR imaging of prostate cancer. Radiographics, 27 (2007), 63–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akin, O., Hricak, H., Imaging of prostate cancer. Radiol Clin North Am, 45 (2007), 207–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, S., Rosen, M., MR imaging and MR spectroscopy in prostate cancer management. Radiol Clin North Am, 44 (2006), 723–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. K., Hong, S. S., Choi, Y. J., et al., Wash-in rate on the basis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: usefulness for prostate cancer detection and localization. J Magn Reson Imaging, 22 (2005), 639–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckley, D. L., Roberts, C., Parker, G. J., et al., Prostate cancer: evaluation of vascular characteristics with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging – initial experience. Radiology, 233 (2004), 709–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rouviere, O., Raudrant, A., Ecochard, R., et al., Characterization of time-enhancement curves of benign and malignant prostate tissue at dynamic MRI. Eur Radiol, 13 (2003), 931–42.Google Scholar
Engelbrecht, M. R., Huisman, H. J., Laheij, R. J., et al., Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology, 229 (2003), 248–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hricak, H., Choyke, P. L., Eberhardt, S. C., et al., Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective. Radiology, 243 (2007), 28–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, P., Tozer, D. J., Liney, G. P., et al., Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diffusion-weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate. Magn Reson Med, 46 (2001), 1054–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hosseinzadeh, K., Schwarz, S. D., Endorectal diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging, 20 (2004), 654–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, C., Naganawa, S., Nakamura, T., et al., Differentiation of noncancerous tissue and cancer lesions by apparent diffusion coefficient values in transition and peripheral zones of the prostate. J Magn Reson Imaging, 21 (2005), 258–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shimofusa, R., Fujimoto, H., Akamata, H., et al., Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 29 (2005), 149–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, C. K., Park, B. K., Han, J. J., et al., Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3 T for differentiation of malignant and benign tissue in transition and peripheral zones: preliminary results. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 31 (2007), 449–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurhanewicz, J., Vigneron, D. B., Hricak, H., et al., Three-dimensional 1H spectroscopic imaging of the in situ human prostate with high spatial (0.24 to 0.7 cm3) spatial resolution. Radiology, 198 (1996), 795–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Males, R., Vigneron, D. B., Star-Lack, J., et al., Clinical application of BASING and spectral/spatial water and lipid suppression pulses for prostate cancer staging and localization by in vivo 3D 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med, 43 (2000), 17–22.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheidler, J., Hricak, H., Vigneron, D. B., et al., Prostate cancer: localization with three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging – clinicopathologic study. Radiology, 213 (1999), 473–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beyersdorff, D., Taupitz, M., Winkelmann, B., et al., Patients with a history of elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and negative transrectal US-guided quadrant or sextant biopsy results: value of MR imaging. Radiology, 224 (2002), 701–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beyersdorff, D., Winkel, A., Hamm, B., et al., MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: initial results. Radiology, 234 (2005), 576–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Susil, R. C., Menard, C., Krieger, A., et al., Transrectal prostate biopsy and fiducial marker placement in a standard 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging scanner. J Urol, 175 (2006), 113–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atalar, E., Menard, C., MR-guided interventions for prostate cancer. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 13 (2005), 491–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, I., Oldenburg, N. E., Meskell, P., et al., Real time MRI-ultrasound image guided stereotactic prostate biopsy. Magn Reson Imaging, 20 (2002), 295–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullerad, M., Hricak, H., Kuroiwa, K., et al., Comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging, guided prostate biopsy and digital rectal examination in the preoperative anatomical localization of prostate cancer. J Urol, 174 (2005), 2158–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Futterer, J. J., Heijmink, S. W., Scheenen, T. W., et al., Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology, 241 (2006), 449–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanimoto, A., Nakashima, J., Kohno, H., et al., Prostate cancer screening: the clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging, 25 (2007), 146–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sala, E., Akin, O., Moskowitz, C. S., et al., Endorectal MR imaging in the evaluation of seminal vesicle invasion: diagnostic accuracy and multivariate feature analysis. Radiology, 238 (2006), 929–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engelbrecht, M. R., Jager, G. J., Laheij, R. J., et al., Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol, 12 (2002), 2294–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartolozzi, C., Menchi, I., Lencioni, R., et al., Local staging of prostate carcinoma with endorectal coil MRI: correlation with whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens. Eur Radiol, 6 (1996), 339–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornud, F., Flam, T., Chauveinc, L., et al., Extraprostatic spread of clinically localized prostate cancer: factors predictive of pT3 tumor and of positive endorectal MR imaging examination results. Radiology, 224 (2002), 203–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikonen, S., Karkkainen, P., Kivisaari, L., et al., Magnetic resonance imaging of clinically localized prostatic cancer. J Urol, 159 (1998), 915–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikonen, S., Karkkainen, P., Kivisaari, L., et al., Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging of prostatic cancer: comparison between fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin echo and three-dimensional dual-echo, steady-state sequences. Eur Radiol, 11 (2001), 236–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, F., Treumann, T., Dettmar, P., et al., Limited value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer. BJU Int, 87 (2001), 66–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrotti, M., Kaufman, Jr R. P.., Jennings, T. A., et al., Endo-rectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in clinically localized prostate cancer: is it accurate?J Urol, 156 (1996), 106–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Presti, J. C., Hricak, H., Narayan, P. A., et al., Local staging of prostatic carcinoma: comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 166 (1996), 103–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rorvik, J., Halvorsen, O. J., Albrektsen, G., et al., MRI with an endorectal coil for staging of clinically localised prostate cancer prior to radical prostatectomy. Eur Radiol, 9 (1999), 29–34.Google ScholarPubMed
Yu, K. K., Hricak, H., Alagappan, R., et al., Detection of extracapsular extension of prostate carcinoma with endorectal and phased-array coil MR imaging: multivariate feature analysis. Radiology, 202 (1997), 697–702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, K. K., Scheidler, J., Hricak, H., et al., Prostate cancer: prediction of extracapsular extension with endorectal MR imaging and three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology, 213 (1999), 481–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harisinghani, M. G., Barentsz, J., Hahn, P. F., et al., Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med, 348 (2003), 2491–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, L., Mullerad, M., Chen, H. N., et al., Prostate cancer: incremental value of endorectal MR imaging findings for prediction of extracapsular extension. Radiology, 232 (2004), 133–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullerad, M., Hricak, H., Wang, L., et al., Prostate cancer: detection of extracapsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MR imaging. Radiology, 232 (2004), 140–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, L., Hricak, H., Kattan, M. W., et al., Prediction of organ-confined prostate cancer: incremental value of MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging to staging nomograms. Radiology, 238 (2006), 597–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L., Hricak, H., Kattan, M. W., et al., Prediction of seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: incremental value of adding endorectal MR imaging to the Kattan nomogram. Radiology, 242 (2007), 182–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hricak, H., Wang, L., Wei, D. C., et al., The role of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision regarding whether to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer, 100 (2004), 2655–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steenbakkers, R. J., Deurloo, K. E., Nowak, P. J., et al., Reduction of dose delivered to the rectum and bulb of the penis using MRI delineation for radiotherapy of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 57 (2003), 1269–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sella, T., Schwartz, L. H., Swindle, P. W., et al., Suspected local recurrence after radical prostatectomy: endorectal coil MR imaging. Radiology, 23 (2004), 379–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, J. M., Krebs, T. L., MR imaging evaluation with a transrectal surface coil of local recurrence of prostatic cancer in men who have undergone radical prostatectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 168 (1997), 379–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pucar, D., Shukla-Dave, A., Hricak, H., et al., Prostate cancer: correlation of MR imaging and MR spectroscopy with pathologic findings after radiation therapy – initial experience. Radiology 236 (2005), 545–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala, E., Eberhardt, S. C., Akin, O., et al., Endorectal MR imaging before salvage prostatectomy: tumor localization and staging. Radiology, 238 (2006), 176–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×