Aceves, W. J. (2003). Actio popularis: The class action in international law. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2003(1), 353–402.Google Scholar

Adato, G. V. (2005). La víctima del delito, sus garantías y derechos en el sistema penal de: Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia y México. In García Ramírez, S. (Ed.), Derecho penal: Memoria del congreso internacional de culturas y sistemas jurídicos comparados (Vol. II. Proceso Penal, pp. 3–26). México DF, México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar

Aguayo, S. (1998). 1968: Los Archivos de la violencia. México DF, México: Grijalbo/Reforma.Google Scholar

Aguiar Aguilar, A. A. (2012). Institutional changes in the public prosecutor's office: The cases of Mexico, Chile, and Brazil. Mexican Law Review, IV(2), 262–90.Google Scholar

Aguirre, C., & Salvatore, R. D. (2001). Introduction: Writing the history of law, crime, and punishment in Latin America. In Salvatore, R. D., Aguirre, C., & Joseph, G. M. (Eds.), Crime and punishment in Latin America: Law and society since late colonial times (pp. 1–32). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Álvarez Garín, R. (2008). El 68. Expediente judicial abierto. Alegatos, 70(septiembre/diciembre), 301–10.Google Scholar

Amnistía Internacional. (2000). El legado mortal de Guatemala: El pasado impune y las nuevas violaciones de derechos humanos. Madrid, Spain: Amnistía Internacional.Google Scholar

Andersen, E. A. (2004). Out of the closets and into the courts: Legal opportunity structure and gay rights litigation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Andrews, K. T., & Edwards, B. (2004). Advocacy organizations in the US political process. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 479–506.Google Scholar

Ansa. (2010, October 29). AFEP presenta 141 querellas por homicidios perpretados durante regimen militar. Retrieved from www.emol.com/noticias/nacional/2010/10/29/444385/afep-presenta-141-querellas-por-homicidios-perpetrados-durante-regimen-militar.html.Google Scholar

Ansolabehere, K. (2007). La política desde la justicia: Cortes supremas, gobierno y democracia en Argentina y México. México DF, México: FLACSO/Fontemara.Google Scholar

Ansolabehere, K. (2010). More power, more rights? The supreme court and society in Mexico. In Couso, J. A., Huneeus, A., & Sieder, R. (Eds.), Cultures of legality: Judicialization and political activism in Latin America (pp. 78–111). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Apodaca, C. (2004). The rule of law and human rights. Judicature, 87(6), 292–99.Google Scholar

Aranda, J. (2005, September 7). Revira la SCJN sobre la cadena perpetua. La Jornada. Retrieved from www.jornada.unam.mx/2005/09/07/index.php?section=sociedad&article=055n1soc.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1994). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil (Rev. ed.). New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Bachelet, Michelle (2008) Mensaje No. 76-356 con el que se inicia un Proyecto de Ley que Crea el Fondo Nacional Para la Representación de Víctimas de Delitos, Presidencia de la República de Chile. Retrieved from www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=8&ved=0ahUKEwiPi4mb0MDWAhVM5iYKHdo1BggQFghKMAc&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.camara.cl%2Fpley%2Fpdfpley.aspx%3FprmID%3D6013%26prmTIPO%3DINICIATIVA&usg=AFQjCNH54P1DovSWsxHUNwGgfi_VLYypdQ.Google Scholar

Ballinas, V. (2011, January 19). Defienden jueces de Chihuahua sentencia absolutoria en favor de Sergio Barraza. La Jornada. Retrieved from www.jornada.unam.mx/2011/01/19/politica/010n1pol.Google Scholar

Baluarte, D., & Chlopak, E. (2003). The case of Myrna Mack Chang: Overcoming institutional impunity in Guatemala. The Human Rights Brief, 10(3), 11–14.Google Scholar

Barkow, R. E. (2008). Institutional design and the policing of prosecutors: Lessons from administrative law. Stanford Law Review, 61(4), 869–922.Google Scholar

Benavides, E., Fuentes Morua, J., López Loredo, G., & Michel, G. (2005). Caminos del zapatismo: Resistencia y liberación. México DF, México: RedEs.Google Scholar

Benítez, I. (2007, November 24). Rights Guatemala: Impunity fuels violence against women. Inter Press Service News Agency. Retrieved from www.ipsnews.net/2007/11/rights-guatemala-impunity-fuels-violence-against-women/.Google Scholar

Bergman, M. (2009). Tax evasion and the rule of law in Latin America: The political culture of cheating and compliance in Argentina and Chile. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Bessler, J. D. (1994). The public interest and the unconstitutionality of private prosecutors. Arkansas Law Review, 47(3), 511–602.Google Scholar

Bibas, S. (2009). Prosecutorial regulation versus prosecutorial accountability. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 157(4), 959–1016.Google Scholar

Bickford, L. (2005). Transitional justice in Mexico. Journal of Human Rights, 4(4), 537–57.Google Scholar

Bielous, D., & Petito, V. (2010). Tramitando el Pasado: Violaciones de Derechos Humanos y Agendas Gubernamentales en Casos Latinoamericanos. México: FLACSO México/CLACSO.Google Scholar

Binder, A. M. (2000a). Introducción al derecho procesal penal (2nd ed.). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ad-Hoc.Google Scholar

Binder, A. M. (2000b). Ideas y materiales para la reforma de la justicia penal. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ad-Hoc.Google Scholar

Blake, J. (2014). Should domestic courts prosecute genocide? Examining the trial of Efraín Ríos Montt. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 39(2), 563–612.Google Scholar

Bonillo, C. (2009, November 11). Violencia se extiende en el país. Prensa Libre. Retrieved from www.prensalibre.com/pl/2009/noviembre/29/355479.html.Google Scholar

Borzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2013). Human rights in areas of limited statehood: The new agenda. In Risse-Kappen, T., Ropp, S. C., & Sikkink, K. (Eds.), The persistent power of human rights: From commitment to compliance (pp. 63–84). Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, C. M. (2007). Criminal procedure: A worldwide study (2nd ed.). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar

Brady, H. E., & Collier, D. (2004). Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Braine, T. (2010, Winter). Esther Chávez Cano added up the devastation of gender violence. On the Issues Magazine. Retrieved from www.ontheissuesmagazine.com/2010winter/2010winter_Braine.php.Google Scholar

Brienen, M. E. I., & Hoegen, E. H. (2000). Victims of crime in 22 European criminal justice systems: The implementation of recommendation (85) 11 of the Council of Europe on the position of the victim in the framework of criminal law and procedure. Nijmegen, Netherlands: Wolf Legal Productions/Vidya.Google Scholar

Brinks, D. M. (2008). The judicial response to police killings in Latin America: inequality and the rule of law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brinks, D. M., Leiras, M., & Mainwaring, S. (2014). Reflections on uneven democracies: The legacy of Guillermo O'Donnell. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Brysk, A. (1993). From above and below: Social movements, the international system, and human rights in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies 26(3), 259–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, J. M. (2013). The new accountability agenda in Latin America: The promise and perils of human rights prosecutions. In Hite, K. & Ungar, M. (Eds.), Sustaining human rights in the twenty-first century: Strategies for Latin America (pp. 101–41). Baltimore, MD; Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Burt, J.M. (2016). From heaven to hell in ten days: The genocide trial in Guatemala. Journal of Genocide Research 18(2–3), 143–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

CADHAC & CEDEHM. (2014). Desapariciones forzadas e involuntarias en México: Informe alternativo para la evaluación de México ante el Comité de Desparación Forzada de Naciones Unidas. México DF, México: Ciudadanos en Apoyo a los Derechos Humanos AC and Centro de Derechos Humanos de las Mujeres.Google Scholar

Caianiello, M. (2011). The Italian public prosecutor: An inquisitorial figure in adversarial proceedings? In Luna, E. & Wade, M. (Eds.), Transnational perspectives on prosecutorial power (pp. 250–67). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Camp Keith, L., Tate, C. N., & Poe, S. C. (2009). Is the law a mere parchment barrier to human rights abuse? The Journal of Politics, 71(2), 644–60.Google Scholar

Carmona, B. (2012, November 22). Marisela, Rubí, Sergio … Historia trágica que dio vuelta al mundo. El Diario. Retrieved from http://diario.mx/Local/2012-11-22_15c24999/marisela-rubi-sergio-historia-tragica-que-dio-vuelta-al-mundo/.Google Scholar

Carothers, T. (1999). Aiding democracy abroad: The learning curve. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar

Castañon, A. (2015, April 8). Femicidios en Juárez: 16 víctimas del caso El Navajo aún no tienen justicia. Centro de Investigación Periodística. Retrieved from http://ciperchile.cl/2015/08/04/femicidios-en-juarez-16-victimas-del-caso-el-navajo-aun-no-tienen-justicia/.Google Scholar

Castillejos-Aragón, M. (2013). The transformation of the Mexican Supreme Court into an arena for political contestation. In Kapiszewski, D., Silverstein, G., & Kagan, R. A. (Eds.), Consequential courts: Judicial roles in global perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Castro, J. V. (2008). El Ministerio Público en México (15th ed.). México DF, México: Editorial Porrúa.Google Scholar

CEDEHM. (2010). El acceso a justicia para las mujeres véctimas de violencias de género en el sistema penal acusatorio. Chihuahua, México: Centro de Derechos Humanos de las Mujeres-Ford Foundation.Google Scholar

Cedillo, A., & Herrera Calderón, F. (2012). Challenging authoritarianism in Mexico: Revolutionary struggles and the dirty war (pp. 1964–82). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

CELS. (2008). La lucha por el derecho: Litigio estratégico y derechos humanos. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales (CELS) – Siglo Veintiuno.Google Scholar

Centro de Estudios Sobre Impunidad y Justicia. (2016). Indice Global de Impunidad Mexico 2016. San Andrés Cholula, Puebla, México: Centro de Estudios sobre Impunidad y Justicia–Universidad de las Américas-Puebla.Google Scholar

Chacón, M. (Ed.). (1996). El delito y el delincuente en Guatemala. Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala: FLACSO.Google Scholar

CICIG. (2015, November 25). Sistema de medición de impunidad: Comunicado de prensa 091. Comisión Internacional Contra la Impunidad de Guatemala. Retrieved from www.cicig.org/index.php?mact=News,cntnt01,detail,0&cntnt01articleid=668&cntnt01returnid=67.Google Scholar

CIDAC. (2009). Índice de incidencia delictiva y violencia 2009. México DF, México: Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo AC.Google Scholar

CNN. (2012, May 1). El PRI gobierna los estados más violentos y también los más seguros, www.mexico.cnn.com. Retrieved from http://mexico.cnn.com/nacional/2012/05/01/el-pri-gobierna-los-estados-mas-violentos-y-tambien-los-mas-seguros.Google Scholar

Collí, Ek V. M. (2012). Improving human rights in Mexico: Constitutional reforms, international standards, and new requirements for judges. The Human Rights Brief: Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, 20(12), 7–14.Google Scholar

Collier, R. B., & Collier, D. (1991). Shaping the political arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Collins, C. (2009). Human rights trials in Chile during and after the ‘Pinochet Years’. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 4(1), 67–76.Google Scholar

Collins, C. (2010). Post-transitional justice: Human rights trials in Chile and El Salvador. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar

Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2011). Segundo informe sobre la situación de las defensoras y los defensores de derechos humanos en las Américas. Washington, DC: Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar

Comisión para el Esclarecimiento Histórico. (1999). Guatemala, memoria del silencio. Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala: United Nations Office for Project Services.Google Scholar

Couso, J. A., & Hilbink, L. (2011). From quietism to incipient activism: The institutional and ideational roots of rights adjudication in Chile. In Helmke, G. & Rios-Figueroa, J. (Eds.), Courts in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dancy, G., & Michel, V. (2015). Human rights enforcement from below: Private actors and prosecutorial momentum in Latin America and Europe. International Studies Quarterly 60(1), 173–88.Google Scholar

Daniels, S., & Martin, J. (2009). Legal services for the poor: Access, self-interest, and pro bono. In Sandefur, R. (Ed.), Access to justice: Sociology of crime, law and deviance (Vol. 12, pp. 145–66). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, J. (2006). Justice without borders: Human rights cases in US courts. Law and Policy, 28(1), 60–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2005.00217.x.Google Scholar

Davis, J. (2014). Seeking human rights justice in Latin America: Truth, extra-territorial courts, and the process of justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Daytec-Yangot, C. L. (2011, July 14). The writs of habeas corpus and amparo: A comparison of remedies against the menaces of state power. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2475118.Google Scholar

Dezalay, Y., & Garth, B. G. (2011). Lawyers and the construction of transnational justice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Diez, A. (Ed.). (2004). Violencia contra las mujeres: Tratamiento por parte de la justicia penal de Guatemala. Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala: Instituto de Estudios Comparados en Ciencias Penales de Guatemala–INECIP–Ediciones del Estudio.Google Scholar

Doak, J. (2008). Victims’ rights, human rights and criminal justice: Reconceiving the role of third parties. Portland, OR: Hart.Google Scholar

Dondé Matute, J. (2010). International criminal law before the Supreme Court of Mexico. International Criminal Law Review, 10(4), 571–81. doi: 10.1163/157181210X519018.Google Scholar

Donnelly, J. (2003). Universal human rights in theory and practice (2nd ed.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Dubber, M. D. (2002). Victims in the war on crime: The use and abuse of victims’ rights. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Dubber, M. D. (2006). Comparative criminal law. In Reimann, M. & Zimmermann, R. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of comparative law (pp. 1287–325). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dubber, M. D. (2014). Foundational texts in modern criminal law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Duce, M. (2004). La reforma procesal penal Chilena: Gestación y estado de avance de un proceso de transformación en marcha. In Pasará, L. (Ed.), En busca de una justicia distinta: Experiencias de reforma en América Latina (pp. 195–248). Lima, Perú: Consorcio Justicia Viva.Google Scholar

Duce, M. (2009). Criminal justice reform in Latin America: A panoramic and comparative perspective examining its development, contents, results, and challenge (Universidad Diego Portales Public Policy Series: Working Papers, No. 3). Santiago, Chile: Universidad Diego Portales.Google Scholar

Duce, M., & Riego, R. C. (2007). Proceso penal. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Jurídica de Chile.Google Scholar

Duce, M., Riego, R. C., & Vargas, J. E. (2007, May 11). Víctimas y sistema penal. El Mercurio, A2.Google Scholar

Due Process of Law Foundation. (2007). Después de los procesos de justicia transicional ¿cuál es la situación de las víctimas? Los casos de Chile y Guatemala. Washington, DC: Due Process of Law Foundation.Google Scholar

Dussich, J. P. J. (2006). Victimology: Past, present, and past (131st International Senior Seminar – Resource Material Series, Vol. 70, pp. 116–29). Tokyo, Japan: United Nations Asia and Far East Institute for the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders.Google Scholar

Dyson, M. (2014). Unravelling tort and crime. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Encarnación, O. G. (2014). Democracy without justice in Spain: The politics of forgetting. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Epp, C. R. (1998). The rights revolution: Lawyers, activists, and supreme courts in comparative perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Espina Otero, A. (2007, July 11). Víctimas y solución del conflicto penal. El Mercurio, A2.Google Scholar

Ewald, W. (1995). Comparative jurisprudence (II): The logic of legal transplants. American Journal of Comparative Law, 43, 489–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fassin, D., & Rechtman, R. (2009). The empire of trauma: An inquiry into the condition of victimhood. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2008). Crime in the United States, 2007. Retrieved from www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2007/index.html.Google Scholar

Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2012). Uniform crime reporting statistics, estimated murder rate 1960–2010. Retrieved from www.ucrdatatool.gov/Search/Crime/State/RunCrimeTrendsInOneVar.cfm.Google Scholar

Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2015). Uniform crime reports as prepared by the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data. Retrieved from https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2015/crime-in-the-u.s.-2015/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/clearances.Google Scholar

Fenwick, H. (1997). Procedural “rights” of victims of crime: Public or private ordering of the criminal justice process? The Modern Law Review, 60(3), 317–33.Google Scholar

Fernández, K. (2010, September 2). Lawyer from the Human Rights Program of the Interior Ministry in Chile, during her participation at the symposium “El estado de los juicios de Derechos Humanos en Chile y lanzamiento del primer buscador público de causas en el país”. Santiago, Chile: ICSO-Universidad Diego Portales, Auditorio Museo de la Memoria.Google Scholar

Ferrandino, Á. (2004). Acceso a la justicia. In Pasará, L. (Ed.), En busca de una justicia distinta: Experiencias de reforma en América Latina (pp. 377–408). Lima, Perú: Consorcio Justicia Viva.Google Scholar

Ferstman, C. (2011). International criminal law and victims’ rights. In Schabas, W. & Bernaz, N. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of international criminal law (pp. 407–18). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

FIDH. (2007). Victims’ rights before the International Criminal Court: A guide for victims, their legal representatives, and NGOs. Paris, France: International Federation for Human Rights.Google Scholar

FIDH. (2013). Genocidio en Guatemala: Ríos Montt culpable. Paris, France: International Federation for Human Rights.Google Scholar

Fix Fierro, H. (2003). La reforma judicial en México ¿De dónde viene? ¿Hacia dónde va? Reforma Judicial Revista Mexicana de Justicia, 2, 251–324.Google Scholar

Frey, B. A. (2015). Uneven ground: Asymmetries of power in human rights advocacy in Mexico. In Pruce, J. R. (Ed.), The social practice of human rights (pp. 121–39). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Fuerzas Armadas Rebeldes. (1983). Los Tribunales de Fuero Especial: Otra Evidencia de la Criminalidad del Régimen. Fuerzas Armadas Rebeldes, 32(3), 4. Available at: Archivo de la Coordinadora Alemana de Solidaridad con Guatemala (GT-CIRMA-AH-019), Serie 2, N. 1481, Archivo Histórico del Centro de Investigaciones Regionales de Mesoamérica, Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala.Google Scholar

Fundación Myrna Mack. (2010). Caso Myrna Mack: Un juicio al impulso criminal del estado. Ciudad de Guatemala: Fundación Myrna Mack.Google Scholar

Fundación Myrna Mack. (2006). Una aproximacion a los rasgos de la violencia en Guatemala. Retrieved from www.myrnamack.org.gt/images/stories/fmm/archivos/analisis/2006/violencianmerodos-0406.pdf.Google Scholar

Fundación Paz Ciudadana. (2008). El estado actual de la víctima en el proceso penal chileno. Santiago, Chile: Fundación Paz Ciudadana.Google Scholar

Fundación Rigoberta Menchú. (1999, December). Querella de Rigoberta Menchú Tum al juzgado central de instrucción de la Guardia de la Audiencia Nacional en España. Retrieved from http://blogderechopenal.blogspot.com/2005/11/querella-de-rigoberta-mench-caso.html.Google Scholar

Funk, T. M. (2010). Victims’ rights and advocacy at the International Criminal Court. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Galanter, M. (1974). Why the “haves” come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law & Society Review, 9(1), 95–160.Google Scholar

Gallagher, J. (2017). The last mile problem: Activists, advocates and the struggle for justice in domestic courts. Comparative Political Studies, 50(12), 1666–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016688001.Google Scholar

García-Godos, J., & Salvadó, L. R. (2016). Guatemala: Truth and memory on trial. In Skaar, E., García-Godos, J., & Collins, C. (Eds.), Transitional justice in Latin America: The uneven road from impunity towards accountability. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Garita, A. I. (2009, June 4). Governance in Guatemala: Comision internacional contra la impunidad en Guatemala. Paper presented at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Garro, A. M. (1999). Access to justice for the poor in Latin America. In Méndez, J. E., O'Donnell, G. A., & Pinheiro, P. (Eds.), The (un)rule of law and the underprivileged in Latin America. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Gimeno Sendra, V., Moreno Catena, V., & Cortés Domínguez, V. (1999). Derecho procesal penal (3rd ed.). Madrid, España: Editorial Colex.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T., & Moustafa, T. (2008). Rule by law: The politics of courts in authoritarian regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Godoy, A. S. (2006). Popular injustice: Violence, community, and law in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Goldman, F. (2007). The art of political murder: Who killed the bishop? New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar

González-Ocantos, E. (2016). Shifting legal visions: Judicial change and human rights trials in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gourevitch, P. (1978). The second image reversed: The international sources of domestic politics. International Organization, 21(4), 881–912.Google Scholar

Graziadei, M. (2006). Comparative law as the study of transplants and receptions. In Reimann, M. & Zimmermann, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gruber, A. (2007). The feminist war on crime. Iowa Law Review, 92(1), 741–833.Google Scholar

Guarnieri, C. (2003). Courts as an instrument of horizontal accountability: The case of Latin Europe. In Maravall, J. M. & Przeworski, A. (Eds.), Democracy and the rule of law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Guayacán Ortiz, J. C. (2013). Las acciones populares y de grupo frente a las acciones colectivas: Elementos de integración del derecho latinoamericano. Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Externado de Colombia.Google Scholar

Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hafetz, J. L. (2002). Pretrial detention, human rights, and judicial reform in Latin America. Fordham International Law Journal, 26(6), 1754–77.Google Scholar

Hammergren, L. (2002). Fifteen years of judicial reform in Latin America: Where we are and why we haven't made more progress. Washington, DC: USAID Global Center for Democracy and Governance.Google Scholar

Hayden, T. (Ed.). (2002). The Zapatista Reader. New York: Thunder's Mouth Press/Nation Books.Google Scholar

Helmke, G., & Ríos Figueroa, J. (2011). Courts in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hernández Forcada, R., & Lugo Garfias, M. E. (2004). Algunas notas sobre la tortura en México. México DF, México: Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar

Hilbink, T. M. (2004). You know the type: Categories of cause lawyering. Law & Social Inquiry, 29(3), 657–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2004.tb01006.x.Google Scholar

Hilbink, L. (2007). Judges beyond politics in democracy and dictatorship: Lessons from Chile. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hilbink, L. (2008). Agents of anti-politics: Courts in Pinochet's Chile. In Ginsburg, T. & Moustafa, T. (Eds.), Rule by law: The politics of courts in authoritarian regimes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hilson, C. (2002). New social movements: The role of legal opportunity. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(2), 238–55. doi: 10.1080/13501760110120246.Google Scholar

Horvitz Lennon, M. I., & López Masle, J. (2002). Derecho procesal penal Chileno (Vol. 1). Santiago, Chile: Editorial Jurídica de Chile.Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch. (2009). Uniform impunity: Mexico's misuse of military justice to prosecute abuses in counternarcotics and public security operations. Human Rights Watch. Retrieved from www.hrw.org/reports/2009/04/28/uniform-impunity.Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch. (2011). Neither rights nor security: Killings, torture, and disappearances in Mexico's war on drugs. Human Rights Watch. Retrieved from www.hrw.org/reports/2011/11/09/neither-rights-nor-security-0.Google Scholar

ICCPG. (2005). Cifras de impunidad del crimen policial contra mujeres. Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala: Instituto de Estudios Comparados en Ciencias Penales de Guatemala.Google Scholar

ICSO. (2010). Human rights trials in Chile and the region (Human Rights Observatory, Bulletin No. 7). Santiago, Chile: Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Sociales-Universidad Diego Portales.Google Scholar

ICSO. (2012a). Human rights trials statistics for Chile. Santiago, Chile: Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Sociales-Universidad Diego Portales.Google Scholar

ICSO. (2012b). Observatorio de derechos humanos. Santiago, Chile: Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Sociales-Universidad Diego Portales. Retrieved from www.icso.cl/observatorios/observatorio-derechos-humanos/cifras-causas-case-statistics/#causas.Google Scholar

INEGI. (2015). Datos preliminares que revelan que en el 2014 se registraron 19 mil 669 homicidios. México DF, México: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.Google Scholar

Ingram, M. C. (2016). Mandates, geography, and networks: Diffusion of criminal procedure reform in Mexico. Latin American Politics and Society, 58(1), 121–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2016.00301.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Kemp, S. (2004). The inter-relationship between the Guatemalan Commission for Historical Clarification and the search for justice in national courts. In Schabas, W. & Darcy, S. (Eds.), Truth commissions and courts: The tension between criminal justice and the search for truth (pp. 67–103). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

Kirchengast, T. (2008). Private prosecution and the victim of crime (Macquarie Law Working Paper Series, April). Sydney, Australia: Macquarie University.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, H. (1993). Social movements, political parties, and democratic theory. Annals of the American Academy of Political Science and Social Science, 528(July), 13–29.Google Scholar

La Nación. (2010, August 11). Agrupación se querella por 103 ejecutados políticos. La Nación. Retrieved from http://afepchile.cl/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=212:agrupacion-se-querella-por-103-ejecutados-politicos&catid=1:ultimas&Itemid=71.Google Scholar

Langer, M. (2007). Revolution in Latin American criminal procedure: Diffusion of legal ideas from the periphery. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 55, 617–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langer, M. (2011). The diplomacy of universal jurisdiction: The role of political branches in the transnational prosecution of international crimes. American Journal of International Law, 105(1), 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lauren, P. G. (2003). The evolution of international human rights (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2007). Mobilizing citizens: Social movements and the politics of knowledge (Institute of Development Studies (IDS) Working Paper No. 276). Brighton, UK: IDS–University of Sussex.Google Scholar

Lessa, F., Olsen, T. D., Payne, L., Pereira, G., & Reiter, A. G. (2014). Persistent or eroding impunity? The divergent effects of legal challenges to amnesty laws for past human rights violations. Israel Law Review, 47(1), 105–31.Google Scholar

Lutz, E., & Sikkink, K. (2001). The justice cascade: The evolution and impact of foreign human rights trials in Latin America. Chicago Journal of International Law, 2(1), 1–33.Google Scholar

Lynn, S. (1998). The Myrna Mack case: An update. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

Ma, Y. (2008). Exploring the origins of public prosecution. International Criminal Justice Review, 18(2), 190–211.Google Scholar

Madera, F. (2012). Acusador Coadyuvante, figura poco utilizada pero de gran ayuda. Contexto de Durango. Retrieved from http://contextodedurango.com.mx/noticias/2012/03/10/acusador-coadyuvante-figura-poco-utilizada-pero-de-gran-ayuda/.Google Scholar

Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. A. (2010). A theory of gradual institutional change. In Mahoney, J. & Thelen, K. A. (Eds.), Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power (pp. 1–37). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Malone, M. F. T. (2012). The rule of law in Central America: Citizens’ reactions to crime and punishment. New York: Continuum International.Google Scholar

Marín Verdugo, F. (2008, March 31). Derechos de las víctimas. Selected Works. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/felipe_marin/9/.Google Scholar

Marshall, P. D. (2011). A comparative analysis of the right to appeal. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 22(1), 1–46.Google Scholar

Marshall, A.-M., & Hale, D. C. (2014). Cause lawyering. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 10(1), 301–20. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102612-133932.Google Scholar

McAdam, D. (2004). Revisiting the U.S. civil rights movement: Toward a more synthetic understanding of contention. In Goodwin, J. & Jasper, J. M. (Eds.), Rethinking social movements: Structure, meaning, and emotion (pp. 201–32). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (1997). Toward an integrated perspective on social movements and revolution. In Lichbach, M. I. & Zuckerman, A. S. (Eds.), Comparative politics: Rationality, culture, and structure (pp. 142–73). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Meili, S. (2001). Latin American cause-lawyering networks. In Sarat, A. & Scheingold, S. A. (Eds.), Cause lawyering and the state in a global era (pp. 307–33). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Méndez, J. E., O'Donnell, G. A., & Pinheiro, P. (Eds.). (1999). The (un)rule of law and the underprivileged in Latin America. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Merryman, J. H., & Pérez-Perdomo, R. (2007). The civil law tradition: An introduction to the legal systems of Europe and Latin America (3rd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Michel, V. (2017). The role of prosecutorial independence and prosecutorial accountability in human rights trials. Journal of Human Rights, 16(2), 193–219. doi: 10.1080/14754835.2015.1113864.Google Scholar

Michel, V., & Sikkink, K. (2013). Human rights prosecutions and the participation rights of victims in Latin America. Law and Society Review, 47(4), 873–907.Google Scholar

Ministerio Público. (2007). Delitos contra la vida en Guatemala. Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala: Ministerio Público–Organismo Judicial–Ministerio de Gobernación.Google Scholar

Ministerio Público. (2008). Memoria de Labores Ministerio Público. Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala: Ministerio Público–Organismo Judicial–Ministerio de Gobernación.Google Scholar

Monterroso Castillo, J. (2008). Investigación criminal: Estudio comparativo y propuesta de un modelo de policía de investigación en Guatemala (2nd ed.). Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala: Instituto de Estudios Comparados en Ciencias Penales de Guatemala.Google Scholar

Neira, A. (2009, June 2). Ministerio Público deja el 60.1% de los casos sin resolver. La Tercera, 16.Google Scholar

OACNUDH. (2007). El litigio estratégico en México: La aplicación de los derechos humanos a nivel práctico. México DF, México: Oficina en México del Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas Para los Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar

O'Connor, K. (Producer), & Portenier, G. (Director). (2007). Killer's paradise [Motion Picture]. Canada: BBC.Google Scholar

O'Donnell, G. (1993). On the state, democratization, and some conceptual problems: A Latin American view with glances at some post communist countries. World Development, 21(8), 1355–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ohlheiser, A. (2014, December 12). Death of Tamir Rice, 12-year-old shot by Cleveland police, ruled a homicide. Washington Post. Retrieved from www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2014/12/12/death-of-tamir-rice-12-year-old-shot-by-cleveland-police-ruled-a-homicide/.Google Scholar

Open Society Foundations. (2014). Presumption of guilt: The global overuse of pretrial detention. New York: Open Society Foundations.Google Scholar

Open Society Foundations. (2016). Undeniable atrocities: Confronting crimes against humanity in Mexico. New York: Open Society Foundations.Google Scholar

Oquendo, A. R. (2006). Latin American law. New York: Foundation Press & Thomson West.Google Scholar

Oquendo, A. R. (2007). The solitude of Latin America: The struggle for rights south of the border. Texas International Law Journal, 43, 185.Google Scholar

Oxhorn, P. (2003). Social inequality, civil society, and the limits of citizenship in Latin America. In Eckstein, S. & Wickham-Crowley, T. (Eds.), What justice? Whose justice? Fighting for fairness in Latin America (pp. 35–63). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Pan American Health Organization. (1991). World health statistics. Retrieved from www.paho.org.Google Scholar

Payne, L. A. (2008). Unsettling accounts: Neither truth nor reconciliation in confessions of state violence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Pérez Fernández, Y. (2007). El Cambio de Jurisprudencias de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación sobre la Interpretación del Concepto de Pena Inusitada. Revista Jurídica, 23(2), 631–67.Google Scholar

Pérez Gil, J. (1997). La acusación (unpublished doctoral dissertation). España: Facultad de Derecho-Universidad de Valladolid. Valladolid.Google Scholar

Pérez Gil, J. (2003). Private interests seeking punishment: Prosecution brought by private individuals and groups in Spain. Law and Policy, 25(2), 151–71.Google Scholar

Perez-Pena, R., & Smith, M. (2015, June 11). Cleveland judge finds probable cause to charge officers in Tamir Rice death. New York Times. Retrieved from www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2014/12/12/death-of-tamir-rice-12-year-old-shot-by-cleveland-police-ruled-a-homicide/.Google Scholar

Peruzzotti, E., & Smulovitz, C. (2006). Social accountability: An introduction. In Peruzzotti, E. & Smulovitz, C. (Eds.), Enforcing the rule of law: Social accountability in the new Latin American democracies (pp. 3–54). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Petrovec, D. (1997). Resurrection of victims. Social Justice, 24(1), 163–77.Google Scholar

Procuraduría General de la República. (2006). Informe final: Fiscalía especial para la atención de delitos relacionados con los homicidios de mujeres en el municipio de Juárez, Chihuahua. México DF, México: Subprocuraduría de Derechos Humanos, Atención a Víctimas y Servicios a la Comunidad–Procuraduría General de la República.Google Scholar

Piedrabuena, R. G. (2009). Cómo proteger mejor los intereses de las víctimas y de esta manera contribuir a la disminución de la delincuencia. Revista Chilena de Derecho, 36(3), 671–7.Google Scholar

Poniatowska, E. (1971). La Noche de Tlatelolco: Testimonios de Historia Oral. México: Biblioteca Era.Google Scholar

Popkin, M. (1996). Guatemala's national reconciliation law: Combating impunity or continuing it? Revista Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos, 24, 173–84.Google Scholar

Popkin, S. L. (1987). Political entrepreneurs and peasant movements in Vietnam. In Taylor, M. (Ed.), Rationality and revolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Prillaman, W. C. (2000). The judiciary and democratic decay in Latin America. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Programa de Derechos Humanos. (2010, July). Boletín estadístico al 31 de julio del2010. Santiago, Chile: Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar

Programa de Derechos Humanos. (2015, November). Estado procesal de agentes y civiles vinculados en causas de violaciones de derechos humanos. Retrieved from http://pdh.minjusticia.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/lista-HISTORICA-2015-1373-procesados-acusados-condenados-1.pdf.Google Scholar

Przeworski, A., & Maravall, J. M. (2003). Democracy and the rule of law. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Quezada, S. A., & Rangel, J. T. (2006). Neither truth nor justice: Mexico's de facto amnesty. Latin American Perspectives, 33(2), 56–68. doi: 10.1177/0094582X05286085.Google Scholar

Ramsey, C. B. (2002). The discretionary power of “public” prosecutors in historical perspective. American Criminal Law Review, 39, 1309–93.Google Scholar

Rentschler, C. A. (2011). Second wounds: Victims’ rights and the media in the U.S. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Reydams, L., Wouters, J., & Ryngaert, C. (2012). International prosecutors. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Riego, C., & Duce, M. (2009). Prisión Preventiva y Reforma Procesal Penal en América Latina: Evaluación y Perspectivas. Santiago, Chile: CEJA–JSCA.Google Scholar

Rios-Figueroa, J. (2006). Judicial independence: Definition, measurement, and its effects on corruption. An analysis of Latin America (unpublished doctoral dissertation). New York: New York University.Google Scholar

Rios-Figueroa, J. (2012). Justice system institutions and corruption control: Evidence from Latin America. The Justice System Journal, 33(2), 195–214.Google Scholar

Risse-Kappen, T., Ropp, S. C., & Sikkink, K. (2013). The persistent power of human rights: From commitment to compliance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Risse, T., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices: Introduction. In Risse, T., Ropp, S. C., & Sikkink, K. (Eds.), The power of human rights: International norms and domestic change (pp. 1–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rivas, M., & Fierro, F. (2008, November 14). Retos legislativos frente a la reconvención a un nuevo sistema de justicia penal en el estado de Chihuahua. Paper presented at the seminar La Aplicación de los Juicios Orales: Experiencias, Perspectivas y Retos Para Campeche at the Tribunal Superior de Justicia del Estado de Campeche, Campeche, México.Google Scholar

Rodríguez Ferreira, O., & Shirk, D. A. (2015). Criminal procedure reform in Mexico 2008–2016: The final countdown for implementation. San Diego, CA: University of San Diego.Google Scholar

Roht-Arriaza, N., & Bernabeu, A. (2012). Many roads to justice: Transnational prosecutions and international support for criminal investigations in post-conflict Guatemala. In Almqvist, J. & Espósito, C. (Eds.), The role of courts in transitional justice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Roht-Arriaza, N., & Gibson, L. (1998). The developing jurisprudence on amnesty. Human Rights Quarterly, 10(4), 843–85.Google Scholar

Ronfeldt, D. F. (1984). The modern Mexican military, a reassessment. San Diego, CA: University of California.Google Scholar

Russell, P. (2001). Toward a general theory of judicial independence. In Russell, P. H. & O'Brien, D. (Eds.), Judicial independence in the age of democracy. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar

Sack, J., Shapiro, A., & Castro, L. (2015). La lucha: The story of Lucha Castro and human rights in Mexico. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.Google Scholar

Salvatore, R. D., Aguirre, C., & Joseph, G. M. (2001). Crime and punishment in Latin America: Law and society since late colonial times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Sánchez, A., Magaloni, B., & Magar, E. (2011). Legalist versus interpretativist: The Supreme Court and the democratic transition in Mexico. In Helmke, G. & Ríos-Figueroa, J. (Eds.), Courts in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sanford, V. (2003). Buried secrets: Truth and human rights in Guatemala. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanford, V. (2008). From genocide to femicide: Impunity and human rights in twenty-first century Guatemala. Journal of Human Rights, 7(2), 104–22.Google Scholar

Sanford, V. (2009). La masacre de Panzós: Etnicidad, tierra y violencia en Guatemala. Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala: F&G Editores.Google Scholar

Sarat, A., & Clarke, C. (2008). Beyond discretion: Prosecution, the logic of sovereignty, and the limits of law. Law and Society Inquiry, 33(2), 387–416.Google Scholar

Sarat, A., & Scheingold, S. A. (2006). Cause lawyers and social movements. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Sarat, A., & Scheingold, S. A. (2008). The cultural lives of cause lawyers. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sarles, M. J. (2001). USAID's support of justice reform in Latin America. In Domingo, P. & Sieder, R. (Eds.), Rule of law in Latin America: The international promotion of judicial reform. London, UK: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London.Google Scholar

Schedler, A., Diamond, L. J., & Plattner, M. F. (1999). The self-restraining state: Power and accountability in new democracies. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar

Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308.Google Scholar

Seguridad Pública. (2015). Tasa de denuncias y detenidos delitos de mayor connotación social. Retrieved from www.seguridadpublica.gov.cl/estadisticas/tasa-de-denuncias-y-detenciones/delitos-de-mayor-connotacion-social-series-de-datos-2001-2015/.Google Scholar

SENAME. (2008). Sename fortalece los equipos de representación jurídica de niños y familias vulneradas en sus derechos. Boletín informativo. Retrieved from www.sename.cl/wsename/estructuras.Google Scholar

Sidman, A. (1975). The outmoded concept of private prosecution. The American University Law Review, 25(1975–6), 754–94.Google Scholar

Sieder, R., Angell, A., & Schjolden, L. (2005). The judicialization of politics in Latin America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Sikkink, K. (1993). Human rights, principled issue-networks, and sovereignty in Latin America. International Organization, 47(3), 411–41.Google Scholar

Sikkink, K. (2002). Transnational advocacy networks and the social construction of legal rules. In Dezalay, Y. & Garth, B. G. (Eds.), Global prescriptions: The production, exportation, and importation of a new legal orthodoxy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Sikkink, K. (2005). The transnational dimension of the judicialization of politics in Latin America. In Sieder, R., Schjolden, L., & Angell, A. (Eds.), The judicialization of politics in Latin America (pp. 263–92). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Sikkink, K., & Walling, C. B. (2007). The impact of human rights trials in Latin America. Journal of Peace Research, 44(4), 427–45. doi: 10.1177/0022343307078953.Google Scholar

Simmons, B. (2009). Mobilizing for human rights: International law in domestic politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (2006). Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization, 60(4), 781–810.Google Scholar

Skaar, E. (2001). Judicial independence and human rights policies in Argentina and Chile. Bergen, Germany: Chr. Michelsen Institute.Google Scholar

Skaar, E. (2011). Judicial independence and human rights in Latin America: Violations, politics, and prosecution. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Skaar, E., García-Godos, J., & Collins, C. (Eds.). (2016). Transitional justice in Latin America: The uneven road from impunity towards accountability. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Sobrevivientes. (2009). Informe de labores 2008. Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala: Sobrevivientes. Retrieved from www.sobrevivientes.org/informes_02.html.Google Scholar

Sobrevivientes. (2015). Informe de labores 2014: Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala: Sobrevivientes. Retrieved from www.sobrevivientes.org/informes/delabores/inf_fs_2014.pdf.Google Scholar

Staton, J. K. (2010) Judicial power and strategic communication in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Steinberg, A. (1984). From private prosecution to plea bargaining: Criminal prosecution, the district attorney, and American legal history. Crime and Delinquency, 30(4), 568–92.Google Scholar

Steinberg, A. (1989). The transformation of criminal justice, Philadelphia 1800–1880. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Stephens, B. (2001). Translating filartiga: A comparative and international law analysis of domestic remedies for international human rights violations. Yale Journal of International Law, 27(1), 21.Google Scholar

Stramwasser, I., & Wemp, B. (2010). Guatemala: Attacks on jurists 2005–2009. Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada. Retrieved from www.lrwc.org/ws/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Guatemala.Attacks.on_.Jurists.2005.2009.pdf.Google Scholar

Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación. (2014). Guía de apoyo para el estudio y aplicación del código nacional de procedimientos penales. Mexico City, Mexico: Suprema Cortede Justicia de la Nación–Consejo de la Judicatura.Google Scholar

Svendsen, K. (Ed.). (2007). Por ser mujer: Limitantes del sistema de justicia ante muertes violentas de mujeres y víctimas de delitos sexuales. Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala: Instituto deEstudios Comparados en Ciencias Penales de Guatemala.Google Scholar

Tarrow, S. G. (1994). Power in movement: Social movements, collective action, and politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tarrow, S. G. (1996). States and opportunities: The political structuring of social movements. In McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 41–61). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tiede, L. B. (2012). Chile's criminal law reform: Enhancing defendant's rights and citizen security. Latin American Politics and Society, 54(3), 65–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2012.00165.x.Google Scholar

TJRC. (2014). The transitional justice research collaborative: Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide with new data. Retrieved from www.transitionaljusticedata.com.Google Scholar

United Nations Office for Drug Control and CrimePrevention. (1999). Handbook on justice for victims. New York: United Nations Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention.Google Scholar

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2011). Global study on homicide. Retrieved from www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/statistics/crime/global-study-on-homicide-2011.html.Google Scholar

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2013). Global study on homicide 2013. Retrieved from www.unodc.org/gsh/.Google Scholar

Van Aaken, A., Feld, L. P., & Voigt, S. (2010). Do independent prosecutors deter political corruption? An empirical evaluation across seventy-eight countries. American Law and Economics Review, 12(1), 204–44.Google Scholar

Van Aaken, A., Salzberger, E., & Voigt, S. (2004). The prosecution of public figures and the separation of powers. confusion within the executive branch – A conceptual framework. Constitutional Political Economy, 15(3), 261–80.Google Scholar

Vanhala, L. (2012). Legal opportunity structures and the paradox of legal mobilization by the environmental movement in the UK. Law & Society Review, 46(3), 523–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00505.x.Google Scholar

Vásquez, N. (2001). Caso de Myrna Mack Chang: Síntesis esquemática de los recursos en el caso de Myrna Mack 1993–2001. Guatemala City, Guatemala: Fundación Myrna Mack.Google Scholar

Vera Institute of Justice. (2003). Analizando la Reforma a la Justicia Criminal en Chile: Un estudio empírico entre el nuevo y el antiguo sistema penal. Santiago, Chile: Ministerio Público de Chile–Vera Institute of Justice.Google Scholar

Viano, E. (Ed.). (1991). Victim's rights and legal reforms: International perspectives. Oñati. Spain: Oñate Institute for the Sociology of Law.Google Scholar

Villalobos, D. (2009). Caso Lolita: Transita por el laberinto del nuevo sistema y no encuentra justicia. Veredicto: Revista Especializada en el Nuevo Sistema de Justicia Penal, 1(5), 12–17.Google Scholar

Villaseñor, M. E. (1994). Myrna Mack y su encuentro con la justicia. Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala: Fundación Myrna Mack.Google Scholar

Vogler, R. (2012). Due process. In Rosenfeld, M. & Sajó, A. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law (pp. 929–47). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Volchanskaya, O. (2009). Abren camino en la coadyuvancia. Veredicto: Revista Especializada en el Nuevo Sistema de Justicia Penal, 1(1), 20–3.Google Scholar

Waiselfisz, J. J. (2008). Mapa da Violencia: Os jovens da America Latina. Brasilia, Brazil: RITLA–Instituto Sangari–Ministério da Justica.Google Scholar

Weber, M. (1965). Politics as a vocation. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.Google Scholar

Weld, K. (2014). Paper cadavers: The archives of dictatorship in Guatemala. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Weyland, K. (2005). Theories of policy diffusion: Lessons from Latin American pension reform. World Politics, 57(January), 262–95.Google Scholar

Wiesel, E. (2006). Night. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar

Wiesel, T., & Corillon, C. (Eds.). (2003). Guatemala: Human rights and the Myrna Mack case. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, J. K. (2009). The Praeger handbook of victimology. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar

Wise, E. M. (1990). The transplant of legal patterns. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 38, 1–22.Google Scholar

World Health Organization. (1997). Word report on violence and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

World Health Organization. (2002). World Report on Violence and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Wright, M. W. (2011). Necropolitics, narcopolitics, and femicide: Gendered violence on the Mexico–U.S. border. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 36(3), 707–31.Google Scholar

Zaffaroni, E. R. (1986). Sistemas penales y derechos humanos en América Latina. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos–Depalma Ediciones.Google Scholar

Zaffaroni, E. R. (Ed.). (2000). Sistema penal y derechoshHumanos Brasil, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, México, Nicaragua, Panamá, España (2nd ed.). México DF, México: Editorial Porrúa-Secretaría de Gobernación–ILANUD–Comisión Europea.Google Scholar

Zamora Márque, A. (2015). Desestiman caso de feminicidio: Mínima condena para agresor. Cima Noticias. Retrieved from www.cimacnoticias.com.mx/node/70149.Google Scholar

Zamudio, H. F. (1979). A brief introduction to the Mexican writ of amparo. California Western International Law Journal, 9, 306.Google Scholar

Zedner, L. (2002). Victims. In Maguire, M., Morgan, R., & Reiner, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (3rd ed., pp. 419–56). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar