Abouzahr, C., ‘Antepartum and postpartum haemorrhage’ in Murray, C. J. L. and Lopez, A. D. (eds.), Health Dimensions of Sex and Reproduction (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1998), pp. 172–4Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Opinion Number 183, Routine Storage of Umbilical Cord Blood for Potential Future Transplantation (Washington, DC, ACOG, 1997)

Anderson, Elizabeth, ‘Is women's labor a commodity?’ (1990) 19 Philosophy and Public Affairs71–92Google Scholar

Anderson, ElizabethValue in Ethics and Economics (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Andorno, Roberto, ‘Population genetic databases: a new challenge to human rights’ in Lenk, Christian, Hoppe, Nils and Andorno, Roberto (eds.), Ethics and Law of Intellectual Property: Current Problems in Politics, Science and Technology (Aldershot, Ashgate, 2006), ch. 2Google Scholar

Andrews, Lori B., ‘Control and compensation: laws regulating extracorporeal generative materials’ (1989) 14 Journal of Medicine and Philosophy541–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, Lori B.‘Genes and patent policy: rethinking intellectual property rights’ (2002) 3 Nature Reviews Genetics803–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, Lori B.‘Harnessing the benefits of biobanks’ (2005) 33 Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, Lori B. ‘Shared patenting experiences: the role of patients’, paper presented at the fifth workshop of the EC PropEur project, Bilbao, December 2005

Andrieu, Bernard, ‘La santé biotechnologique du corps-sujet’ (2004) 3 Revue philosophique339–44Google Scholar

Annas, George J., ‘Waste and longing: the legal status of placental blood banking’ (1999) 340 New England Journal of Medicine1521–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, The Human Condition (2nd edn, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aristotle, Politics (Benjamin Jowett (tr.)) in The Basic Works of Aristotle (McKeon, Richard (ed.), New York, Random House, 1941), pp. 1127–1324Google Scholar

Aristotle The Generation of Animals (Arthur Platt (tr.)) in The Basic Works of Aristotle (McKeon, Richard (ed.), New York, Random House, 1941), pp. 665–88Google Scholar

Armitage, S., Warwick, R., Fehily, D., Navarrete, C. and Contreras, M., ‘Cord blood banking in London: the first 1000 collections’ (1999) 24 Bone Marrow Transplant139–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arneson, Richard, ‘Lockean self-ownership: towards a demolition’ (1991) 39 Political Studies54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arneson, Richard‘Commodification and commercial surrogacy’ (1992) 21(2) Philosophy and Public Affairs132–64Google Scholar

Attas, Daniel, ‘Freedom and self-ownership’ (2000) 26 Social Theory and Practice1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aubry, C. M. and Rau, F. F., Cours de droit civil français (Brussels, Méline, Cans, 1850)Google Scholar

Australian Law Reform Commission, Genes and Ingenuity: Gene Patenting and Human Health, report number 99, available at www.austlii.edu.au/other/alrc/publications/reports/99/01.html, accessed 8 September 2004

Ball, Nan T., ‘The reemergence of Enlightenment ideas in the 1994 French bioethics debates’ (2000) 50 Duke Law Journal545–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barker, Juliet N. and Wagner, John E., ‘Umbilical-cord blood transplantation for the treatment of cancer’ (2003) 3 Nature Reviews Cancer526–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barker, J. N., Weisdorf, D. J., DeFor, T. E., et al., ‘Rapid and complete donor chimerism in adult recipients of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning’ (2003) 102 Blood1915–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, Antony and Smith, Helen, ‘Cruel cost of the human egg trade’, Observer, 30 April 2006, pp. 6–7Google Scholar

Bartolini, Francesco, Battaglia, Manuela, Cinzia, Iulio and Sirchia, Girolano, ‘Response’ (1995) 86(12) Blood4900Google Scholar

Bartolini, Francesco, Battaglia, M., Julio, C., Sirchia, G. and Rosti, L., ‘Placental blood collection: effects on newborns’ (1995) 85 Blood3361–2Google Scholar

Bateman, Simone, ‘La nature fait-elle (encore) bien les choses?’ (‘Does nature (still) know best?’) in Pharo, Patrick (ed.), L'homme et le vivant: sciences de l'homme et sciences de la vie (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 2004) pp. 391–404Google Scholar

Bateman, Simone (as Simone Bateman Novaes) Les passeurs de gamètes (Nancy, Presses Universitaires de Nancy, 1994)Google Scholar

Battersby, Christine, The Phenomenal Woman: Feminist Metaphysics and the Patterns of Identity (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Baud, Jean-Pierre, L'affaire de la main volée: une histoire juridique du corps (Paris, Editions du Seuil, 1993)Google Scholar

Beauchamp, Tom L. and Childress, James F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics (3rd edn, New York and Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Bellivier, Florence and Noiville, Christine, ‘The commercialisation of human biomaterials: what are the rights of donors of biological materials?’, paper presented at seminar at Faculté de Droit, Université de Paris-I, October 2004

Bellivier, Florence and Noiville, Christine ‘La circulation du vivant humain: modèle de la propriété ou du contrat?’, paper presented at seminar at Faculté de Droit, Université de Paris-I, October 2004

Berg, Jessica W., ‘Risky business: evaluating oocyte donation’ (2001) 1(4) American Journal of Bioethics18–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertomeu, Maria Julia and Sommer, Susanna E., ‘Patents on genetic material: a new originary accumulation’ in Tong, Rosemarie, Donchin, Anne and Dodds, Susan (eds.), Linking Visions: Feminist Bioethics, Human Rights and ther Developing World (Lanham, MD, Rowman and Littlefield, 2004), pp. 183–202Google Scholar

Best, E., The Maori (Wellington, The Polynesian Society, 1941), vol. 1Google Scholar

Beyleveld, Derek and Brownsword, Roger, ‘Patenting human genes: legality, morality and human rights’ in Harris, J. W. (ed.), Property Problems: From Genes to Pension Funds (London, Kluwer Law International, 1997), pp. 9–24Google Scholar

Birke, Lynda, Feminism and the Biological Body (Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Bjorkmann, B. and Hansson, B. O., ‘Bodily rights and property rights’ (2006) 32 Journal of Medical Ethics209–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boggio, Andrea, ‘Charitable trusts and human research genetic databases: the way forward?’ (2005) 1(2) Genomics, Society and Policy41–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bok, H., Schill, K. E. and Faden, R., ‘Justice, ethnicity and stem-cell banks’ (2004) 364 Lancet118–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bosely, Sarah, ‘Doctors’ concern over MS clinic', Guardian, 20 March 2006, p. 3Google Scholar

Bostyn, S. J. R., ‘One patent a day keeps the doctor away? Patenting human genetic information and health care’ (2000) 7 European Journal of Health Law229–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bovenberg, Jasper A., ‘Towards an international system of ethics and governance for biobanks: a “special status” for genetic data?’ (2005) 15(4) Critical Public Health369–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, James, ‘The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain’ (2003) 66 Law and Contemporary Problems33–74Google Scholar

Boyle, James ‘Fencing off ideas: enclosure and the disappearance of the public domain’, Interactivist Info Exchange, available at http://slash.autonomedia.org/analysis, accessed 10 September 2004, p. 5

Boyle, Robert J. and Savulescu, Julian, ‘Ethics of using preimplantation genetic diagnosis to select a stem cell donor for an existing person’ (2001) 323 British Medical Journal1240–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brace, Laura, The Politics of Property: Labour, Freedom and Belonging (Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Braidotti, Rosi, Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory (New York, Columbia University Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Braverman, Andrea M., ‘Exploring ovum donors’ motivations and needs' (2001) 1(4) American Journal of Bioethics16–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenkert, George, ‘Self-ownership, freedom and autonomy’ (1998) 2 Journal of Ethics27–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brownsword, Roger, ‘Biobank governance – business as usual?’, paper presented at the fourth workshop of the EC PropEur project, Tuebingen, 20 January 2005

Brownsword, Roger ‘Biobank governance: property, privacy and consent’ in Lenk, Christian, Hoppe, Nils and Andorno, Roberto (eds.), Ethics and Law of Intellectual Property: Current Problems in Politics, Science and Technology (Aldershot, Ashgate, 2006), ch. 5Google Scholar

Burgio, G. R., Gluckman, Eliane and Locatelli, Franco, ‘Ethical reappraisal of 15 years of cord-blood transplantation’ (2003) 361 Lancet250–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgio, G. R. and Locatelli, F., ‘Transplant of bone marrow and cord blood hematopoietic stem cells in pediatric practice, revisited according to the fundamental principles of bioethics’ (1997) 19 Bone Marrow Transplant1163–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, Judith, Subjects of Desire: Hegelian Reflections on Twentieth-Century France (New York, Columbia University Press, 1987)Google Scholar

Calabresi, G. and Melamed, A. D., ‘Property rules, liability rules and inalienability: one view of the cathedral’ (1972) 85 Harvard Law Review1089–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Committee, Patenting of Higher Life Forms and Related Issues: Report to the Government of Canada Biotechnology Ministerial Coordinating Committee (Ottawa, Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Committee, 2002)

Canadian Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies, Proceed with Care: Final Report of the Commission on New Reproductive Technologies (Ottawa, Minister of Government Services Canada, 1993)

Carvel, John, ‘With love at Christmas – a set of stem cells’, Guardian, 6 December 2005, p. 7Google Scholar

Cassier, Maurice, ‘Brevets et èthique: les controversies sur la brevetabilité des gênes humains’ (2002) 56 Revue française des affaires sociales235–59Google Scholar

Caulfield, Timothy, Gold, E. Richard and Cho, Mildred K., ‘Patenting human genetic material: refocusing the debate’ (2000) 1 Nature Reviews Genetics227–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chadwick, Ruth, ‘The Icelandic data base: do modern times need modern sagas?’ (1999) 319 British Medical Journal441–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chadwick, Ruth ‘Are genes us? Gene therapy and personal identity’ in Becker, G. K., The Moral Status of Persons (Amsterdam, Rodopi, 2000), pp. 183–94Google Scholar

Christman, John, The Myth of Property: Toward an Egalitarian Theory of Ownership (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Claeys, Alain, Rapport sur les conséquences des modes d'appropriation du vivant sur les plans économique, juridique et éthique, Troisième partie, report number 1487 (Paris, Office Parlementaire d'Evaluation des Choix Scientifiques et Technologiques, Assemblée Nationale, available at www.assemblee-nationale.fre/12/oecst/il1487.asp, accessed 23 September 2004Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A., Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coles, David, ‘The European Union strategy on biotechnology, after the 2005 EC report’, paper presented at the seventh workshop of the EC PropEur project, Paris, 6 May 2006

Comité Consultatif National d'Ethique (CCNE), Opinion Number 1: On Sampling of Dead Human Embryonic and Foetal Tissue for Therapeutic, Diagnostic and Scientific Purposes (22 May 1984), available at www.ccne-ethique.fr/english/avis/a_001.htm

Comite Consultatif National d'Ethique (CCNE) Opinion Number 21: That the Human Body should not be Used for Commercial Purposes (13 December 1990)

Comite Consultatif National d'Ethique (CCNE) Opinion Number 37: That the Human Genome should not be Used for Commercial Purposes (2 December 1991)

Comite Consultatif National d'Ethique (CCNE) Opinion Number 64: L'avant-projet de loi portant transposition, dans le code de la propriété intellectuelle de la directive 98/44/CR du parlement Européen et du Conseil en date du 6 juillet 1998, relative à la protection juridique des inventions biotechnologiques (Paris, CCNE, 2000)

Comite Consultatif National d'Ethique (CCNE) Opinion Number 70: Consentement en faveur d'un tiers (Paris, CCNE, 2001)

Comite Consultatif National d'Ethique (CCNE) Opinion Number 74: Umbilical cord blood banks for autologous use or for research (Paris, CCNE, 2002)

Comité Consultatif National d'Ethique (CCNE) and Nationaler Ethikrat (German National Ethics Council), Opinion No. 77: Ethical Problems Raised by the Collected Biological Material and Associated Information Data: ‘Biobanks’, ‘Biolibraries’ (Paris, CCNE, 20 March 2003)

Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy (London, Department for International Development, 2002)

Connolly, William E., Political Theory and Modernity (Oxford, Blackwell, 1988)Google Scholar

Cornish, W. R., Llewelyn, M. and Adcock, M., Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) and Genetics: A Study into the Impact and Management of Intellectual Property Rights within the Healthcare Sector (Cambridge, Cambridge Genetic Knowledge Park, July 2003)Google Scholar

Claire, Crignon-de Oliveira and Gaille-Nikodimov, Marie, A qui appartient le corps humain? Médecine, politique et droit (Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 2004)Google Scholar

Daar, Judith F., ‘Regulating the fiction of informed consent in ART medicine’ (2001) 1(4) American Journal of Bioethics19–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danish Council on Ethics, Patenting Human Genes (Copenhagen, Danish Council on Ethics, 1994)

Davidoff, Leonore, ‘The rationalisation of housework’ in Davidoff, L., Worlds Between: Historical Perspectives on Gender and Class (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Dawson, A. C., ‘The intellectual commons: a rationale for regulation’ (1998) 16(3) Prometheus275–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simone, Beauvoir, Le deuxième sexe (Paris, Gallimard, 1986)Google Scholar

Delavigne, A. and Rozenberg, S., ‘Epidemiology and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): A review’ (2002) 8 Human Reproduction Update559–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delphy, Christine, Close to Home: A Materialist Analysis of Women's Oppression (Leonard, D. (tr. and ed.), London, Hutchinson, in association with the Explorations in Feminism Collective, 1984)Google Scholar

Department of Health (UK), Human Bodies, Human Choices: The Law on Human Organs and Tissue in England and Wales (London, DOH, 2002)

Devalder, K., ‘Preimplantation HLA typing: having children to save our loved ones’ (2005) 31 Journal of Medical Ethics582–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickenson, Donna L., Moral Luck in Medical Ethics and Practical Politics (Aldershot, Avebury, 1991)Google Scholar

Dickenson, Donna L.Property, Women and Politics (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Dickenson, Donna L.‘Procuring gametes for research and therapy: the case for unisex altruism’ (1997) 23 Journal of Medical Ethics93–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickenson, Donna L.‘Property and women's alienation from their own reproductive labour’ (2001) 15(3) Bioethics203–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickenson, Donna L.‘Commodification of human tissue: implications for feminist and development ethics’ (2002) 2(1) Developing World Bioethics55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickenson, Donna L.Risk and Luck in Medical Ethics (Cambridge, Polity Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Dickenson, Donna L. ‘Genetic research and the economic paradigm’ (‘Einwilligung, Kommodifizierung und Vortelsausgleich in der Genforschung’) in Honnefelder, L., et al. (eds.), Das Genetische Wissen und die Zukunft des Menschen (Berlin, De Gruyter, 2003), pp. 139–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickenson, Donna L.‘The threatened trade in human ova’ (2004) 5(2) Nature Reviews Genetics167CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickenson, Donna L.‘Patently paradoxical? Public order and genetic patents’ (2004) 5 Nature Reviews Genetics86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickenson, Donna L.‘Human tissue and global ethics’ (2005) 1(1) Genomics, Society and Policy41–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickenson, Donna L. and Vineis, Paolo, ‘Evidence-based medicine and quality of care’ (2002) 10(3) Health Care Analysis243–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dienst, Paul and Savulescu, Julian, ‘For and against: no consent should be needed for using leftover body material for scientific purposes’ (2002) 325 British Medical Journal648–51Google Scholar

Dodds, Susan, ‘Women, commodification and embryonic stem cell research’ in Humber, James and Almeder, Robert F. (eds.), Biomedical Ethics Reviews: Stem Cell Research (Totowa, NJ, Humana Press, 2003), pp. 149–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunn, John, ‘Consent in the political theory of John Locke’ in J. , Dunn, Political Obligation in its Historical Context (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1980)Google Scholar

Easton, Susan M., ‘Hegel and feminism’ in David, Lamb (ed.), Hegel and Modern Philosophy (London, Croom Helm, 1987)Google Scholar

Ecker, Jeffrey L. and Greene, Michael F., ‘The case against private umbilical cord blood banking’ (2005) 105(6) Obstetrics and Gynecology1282–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ecologist, The, Whose Common Future? Reclaiming the Commons (Philadelphia, New Society Publishers, 1998)

Eisenberg, Rebecca S., ‘How can you patent genes?’ (2002) 2 American Journal of Bioethics3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ende, Norman, ‘Letter’ (1995) 86(12) Blood4699Google Scholar

English, Veronica, Mussell, Rebecca, Sheather, Julian and Sommerville, Ann, ‘Ethics briefings: retention and use of human tissue’ (2004) 30 Journal of Medical Ethics235–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

European Commission Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General, Report on the Regulation of Reproductive Cell Donation in the European Union (Brussels, European Commission, 2006)

European Group on Ethics and New Technologies (EGE), Opinion on the Ethical Aspects of Umbilical Cord Blood Banking, opinion number 19, IP/04/364 (Brussels, EGE, 2004)

Faden, Ruth R., et al., ‘Public stem cell banks: considerations of justice in stem cell research and therapy’ (2003) 33(6) Hastings Center Report13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fagot-Largeault, Anne, ‘Ownership of the human body: judicial and legislative responses in France’ in Have, Henk ten and Welie, Jos (eds.), Ownership of the Human Body: Philosophical Considerations on the Use of the Human Body and its Parts in Healthcare (Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1998), pp. 115–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, Ann, Sexual Democracy: Women, Oppression and Revolution (Boulder, CO, Westview Press, 1991)Google Scholar

Ferguson, Kathy E., The Man Question: Visions of Subjectivity in Feminist Theory (Berkeley and Oxford, University of California Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Fernandez, M. N., Regidor, C. and Cabrera, R., ‘Letter: Umbilical cord blood transplantation in adults’ (2005) 352 New England Journal of Medicine935Google Scholar

FIGO (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics), Ethical Guidelines regarding the Procedure of Collection of Cord Blood (1998), available at www.figo.org.

Foucault, Michel, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977 (Gordon, Colin (ed.), New York, Pantheon, 1980)Google Scholar

Frow, John, ‘Gift and commodity’ in Frow, J., Time and Commodity Culture: Essays in Cultural Theory and Postmodernity (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Gatens, Moira, Feminism and Philosophy: Perspectives on Difference and Equality (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1991)Google Scholar

Gatens, MoiraImaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality (London, Routledge, 1996)Google Scholar

Gerrand, Nicole, ‘The misuse of Kant in the debate about a market in human body parts’ (1999) 16(1) Journal of Applied Philosophy59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilligan, Carol, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development (2nd edn, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Gluckman, E., Broxmeyer, H. A., Auerbach, A. D., et al., ‘Hematopoietic reconstitution in a patient with Fanconi's anemia by means of umbilical-cord blood from an HLA-identical sibling’ (1989) 321 New England Journal of Medicine1174–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gold, E. Richard, Body Parts: Property Rights and the Ownership of Human Biological Materials (Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Gold, E. Richard and Gallochat, Alain, ‘The European Biotech Directive: past as prologue’ (2001) 7 European Law Journal331–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gomez, Jean-Jacques, ‘Intellectual property in human genetics: the French legal approach’, paper presented at the first workshop of the EC PropEur project, Cardiff, July 2004

Gottlieb, Karen, ‘Human biological samples and the law of property: the trust as a model for biological repositories’ in Weir, R. F. (ed.), Stored Tissue Samples: Ethical, Legal and Public Policy Implications (Iowa City, Iowa University Press, 1998), pp. 183–97Google Scholar

Grey, Thomas, “The disintegration of property” in Pennock, J. P. and Chapman, J. (eds.), Nomos XXII: Property (New York, New York University Press, 1980), pp. 69–85Google Scholar

Grubb, Andrew, ‘“I, me mine”: bodies, parts and property’ (1998) 3 Medical Law International299–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunning, Jennifer, ‘Umbilical cord blood banking: a surprisingly controversial issue’, unpublished report for Cardiff Centre for Ethics, Law and Science (CCELS, no date)

Gupta, Jayasna, ‘Postmodern bodies, assisted reproduction and women's agency’, paper presented at the Seventh World International Association of Bioethics conference, Sydney, November 2004

Gurmankin, Andrea D., ‘Risk information provided to prospective oocyte donors in a preliminary phone call’ (2001) 1(4) American Journal of Bioethics3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Juergen, Between Facts and Norms: A Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (William Rehg (tr.), Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Haley, Rebecca, Horvath, Liana and Sugarman, Jeremy, ‘Ethical issues in cord blood banking: summary of a workshop’ (1997) 38 Transfusion367–73Google Scholar

Hansen, Mogens Herman, The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes: Structures, Principles and Ideology (Oxford, Blackwell, 1991)Google Scholar

Hanson, Mark M., ‘Religious voices in biotechnology: the case of gene patenting’ (1997) 27 Hastings Center Report1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haraway, Donna J., Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (New York, Routledge, 1991)Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna J.‘Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’ (1988) 14 Feminist Studies3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardin, Garrett, ‘The tragedy of the commons’ (1968) 162 Science1243Google Scholar

Harding, Sandra, ‘Is gender a variable in conceptions of rationality? A survey of issues’ in Gould, Carol C. (ed.), Beyond Domination: New Perspectives on Feminism and Philosophy (Totowa, NJ, Rowman and Allanheld, 1984), pp. 43– 63Google Scholar

Harris, James W., Property and Justice (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Harris, John, Wonderwoman and Superman: The Ethics of Human Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Harris, John and Sulston, John, ‘Genetic Equity’ (2004) 5 Nature Reviews Genetics796–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, Charlotte H., ‘Neither Moore nor the market’ (2002) 28 American Journal of Law and Medicine77–104Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F., Hegel's Philosophy of Right (T. M. Knox (tr.), Oxford, Oxford University Press 1967)Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.Phenomenology of Spirit (A. V. Miller (tr.), Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1977)Google Scholar

Held, David, Models of Democracy (1st edn, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1987)Google Scholar

Heller, M. and Eisenberg, R., ‘Can patents deter biomedical research?’ (1998) 280Science698–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hermitte, Marie-Angèle, Le sang et le droit: essai sur la transfusion sanguine (Paris, Editions du Seuil, 1996)Google Scholar

Highfield, Roger, ‘Have we been oversold the stem cell dream?’, Daily Telegraph, 29 June 2005Google Scholar

Hofmeyr, G. K., Bex, P. J. M., Skapinker, R. and Delahunt, T., ‘Hasty clamping of the umbilical cord may initiate neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage’ (1989) 29 Medical Hypotheses5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb, Fundamental Legal Conceptions as applied in Judicial Reasoning (New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 1919)Google Scholar

Holland, Suzanne, ‘Contested commodities at both ends of life: buying and selling embryos, gametes and body tissues’ (2001) 11 Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal263–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holm, Soren, ‘Going to the roots of the stem cell controversy’ (2002) 16(6) Bioethics493–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honoré, A. M., ‘Ownership’ in Making Law Bind: Essays Legal and Philosophical (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1987), pp. 161–92Google Scholar

Hottois, Gilbert, Essais philosophie bioéthique et biopolitique (Paris, Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1999)Google Scholar

HUGO (Human Genome Organisation) Ethics Council, Statement on Benefit-Sharing (Vancouver, HUGO, 9 April 2000)

Irigaray, Luce, Ethique de la différence sexuelle (Paris, Editions de Minuit, 1984)Google Scholar

Irigaray, LuceLe temps de la différence: pour une révolution pacifique (Paris, Livre de Poche, 1989)Google Scholar

Jacobs, Allen, Dwyer, James and Lee, Peter, ‘Seventy ova’ (2001) 31 Hastings Center Report12–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaggar, Alison, Feminist Politics and Human Nature (Totowa, NJ, Rowman and Allanheld, 1983)Google Scholar

Jensen, K. and Murray, F., ‘International patenting: the landscape of the human genome’ (2005) 310 Science239–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahn, Jeffrey, ‘Can we broker eggs without making omelets?’ (2001) 1(4) American Journal of Bioethics14–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaiser, Jocelyn, ‘Court decides tissue samples belong to university, not patients’ (2006) 312 Science436CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, Lectures on Ethics (Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill, 1963)Google Scholar

Kattel, Rainer and Riivo, Anton, ‘The Estonian genome project and economic development’ (2004) 8(1–2) Trames: Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences106–28Google Scholar

Kaye, Jane, Helgason, Hordur Helgi, Nomper, Ants, et al., ‘Population genetic databases: a comparative analysis of the law in Iceland, Sweden, Estonia and the UK’ (2004) 8(1–2) Trames: Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences15–33Google Scholar

Klein, Naomi, No Logo (London, Picador, 2000)Google Scholar

Knoppers, Bartha M., ‘Status, sale and patenting of human genetic material: an international survey’ (1999) 1 Nature Reviews Genetics23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knoppers, Bartha M. ‘DNA banking: a retrospective perspective’ in Burley, J. and Harris, J. (eds.), A Companion to Genethics (Oxford, Blackwell, 2002), pp. 379–86Google Scholar

Knoppers, Bartha M., et al., ‘Ethical issues in international collaborative research on the human genome: the HGP and the HDGP’ (1996) 34 Genomics272–5Google Scholar

Knoppers, Bartha M., Hirtle, M. and Glass, K. C., ‘Commercialization of genetic research and public policy’ (1999) 286(5448) Science2277–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koegler, Gesine, et al., ‘A new human somatic stem cell from placental cord blood with intrinsic pluripotent differentiation potential’ (2004) 200(2) Journal of Experimental Medicine123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korts, Kuliki, Weldon, Sue and Gudmansdottir, Margaret Lilja, ‘Genetic databases and public attitudes: a comparison of Iceland, Estonia and the UK’ (2004) 8(1–2) Trames: Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences131–49Google Scholar

Lainez, Villabona B., et al., ‘Early or late umbilical cord clamping? A systematic review of the literature’ (2005) 63(1) Anales Pediatrica14–21Google Scholar

Lanzendorf, S. E., et al., ‘Use of human gametes obtained from anonymous donors for the production of human embryonic stem cell lines’ (2001) 76 Fertility and Society132–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laughlin, M. J., Eapen, M., Rubinstein, P., et al., ‘Outcomes after transplantation of cord blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with leukaemia’ (2004) 351 New England Journal of Medicine2265–75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Laurie, Graeme, (Intellectual) Property: Let's Think about Staking a Claim to our own Genetic Samples (Edinburgh, Arts and Humanities Board Research Centre, 2004)

Lauritzen, Paul, ‘Stem cells, biotechnology and human rights: implications for a posthuman future’ (2005) 35(2) Hastings Center Report25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michele, Dœuff, Hipparchia's Choice: An Essay Concerning Women, Philosophy, etc. (Trista Selous (tr.), Oxford, Blackwell, 1991)Google Scholar

Lessing, Lawrence, The Future of Ideas: the Fate of the Commons in a Connected World (New York, Random House, 2001)Google Scholar

Levitt, Mairi and Weldon, Sue, ‘A well placed trust? Public perceptions of the governance of DNA databases’ (2005) 15(4) Critical Public Health311–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liddell, Kathleen and Wallace, Susan, ‘Emerging regulatory issues for stem cell medicine’ (2005) 1(1) Genomics, Society and Policy54–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lock, Margaret, Twice Dead: Organ Transplants and the Reinvention of Death (Berkeley, University of California Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Locke, John, The Second Treatise on Civil Government (1689), in Penniman, Howard R. (ed.), John Locke: On Politics and Education (New York, D. Van Nostrand, 1947)Google Scholar

Lorentzen, H. and Paterson, F., ‘Le don des vivants: l'altruisme des Norvégiens et des Français?’ in Elster, J. and Herpin, N. (eds.), Ethique des choix médicaux (Arles, Actes Sud, 1992), pp. 121–38Google Scholar

McDonald, S. J. and. Abbott, J. M., ‘Effects of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes (Protocol)’, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, issue 1, art. no. CD004074, first published online 20 January 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGee, Glenn, ‘Gene patents can be ethical’ (1999) 7 Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics417–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGovern, Ann, ‘Sharing our body and blood: organ donation and feminist critiques of sacrifice’ (2003) 28(1) Journal of Medicine and Philosophy89–114Google Scholar

McHale, Jean, ‘Waste, ownership and bodily products’ (2000) 8(2) Health Care Analysis123–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKenzie, Catriona, ‘Conceptions of the body and conceptions of autonomy in bioethics’, paper presented at the Seventh World International Association of Bioethics conference, Sydney, November 2004

MacKinnon, , Catharine, A., Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

McLeod, Carolyn‘Means and partial means: the full range of the objectification of women’ (2003) 28 Canadian Journal of Philosophy219–44Google Scholar

McLeod, Carolyn and Baylis, Francoise, ‘Feminists on the inalienability of human embryos’ (2006) 21(1) Hypatia1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacPherson, C. B., The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke (Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press, 1962)Google Scholar

Macklin, Ruth, ‘What is wrong with commodification?’ in Cohen, C. R. (ed.), New Ways of Making Babies: The Case of Egg Donation (Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1996), pp. 106–21Google Scholar

Mahoney, Joan, ‘An Essay on Surrogacy and Feminist Thought’ in Larry, Gostin (ed.), Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and Privacy (Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1990), pp. 183–97Google Scholar

Maio, Giovanni, ‘The cultural specificity of research ethics – or why ethical debate in France is different’ (2002) 28 Journal of Medical Ethics147–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Malone, T., Catalano, P. J., O'Dwyer, P. J. and Giantonio, B., ‘High rate of consent to bank biologic samples for future research: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience’ (2002) 94 Journal of the National Cancer Institute769–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manson, Neil C., ‘How not to think about genetic information’ (2005) 35 Hastings Center Report3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marx, Karl, Capital (Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling (trs.), Engels, Frederick (ed.), Moscow, Progress, 1954, original edn 1867)Google Scholar

Marx, Karl Early Writings (Bottomore, T. B. (tr. and ed.), New York, McGraw-Hill, 1963)Google Scholar

Marx, KarlGrundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Martin Nicolas (tr.), New York, Vintage Books, 1973)Google Scholar

Marzano-Parisoli, , Maria, M., Penser le corps (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 2002)Google Scholar

Mason, Ken and Laurie, Graeme, ‘Consent or property? Dealing with the body and its parts in the shadow of Bristol and Alder Hey’ (2001) 9 Medical Law Review710–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matthijs, Gert, ‘Editorial: Patenting genes’ (2004) 329 British Medical Journal1358–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mauss, Marcel, The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies (2nd edn, London, Routledge, 1990)Google Scholar

Mead, H. M., Tikanga Maori: Living by Maori Values (Wellington,Huia Publishers, 2003)Google Scholar

Mead, H. M.Whakapapa and the Human Gene (Wellington,Toi Te Taiao/The Bioethics Council of New Zealand, 2004)Google Scholar

Medical Research Council, Public Perceptions of the Collection of Human Biological Samples (London, MRC, 2000)

Medical Research Council Human Tissue and Biological Samples for Use in Research: Operational and Ethical Guidelines (London, MRC, 2001)

Meek, James, ‘Why you are first in the great gene race’, Guardian, 15 November 2000, p. 4Google Scholar

Meilaender, Gilbert, ‘The point of a ban, or, how to think about stem cell research’ (2001) 31 Hastings Center Report9–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Memmi, Dominique, Les gardiens du corps: dix ans de magistère bioéthique (Paris, Editions de l'Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, 1996)Google Scholar

Mercer, Judith S. and Skovgaard, Rebecca L., ‘Neonatal transitional physiology: a new paradigm’ (2002) 15 Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing56–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merchant, Jennifer, ‘Confronting the consequences of medical technology: policy frontiers in the United States and France’ in Givvens, Marianne and Stetson, Dorothy McBride (eds.), Abortion Politics: Public Policy in Cross-Cultural Perspective (New York and London, Routledge, 1996), pp. 189–210Google Scholar

Merle, Jean-Christophe, ‘A Kantian argument for a duty to donate one's own organs: a reply to Nicole Gerrand’ (2000) 17(1) Journal of Applied Philosophy93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, The Visible and the Invisible (Evanston, ILNorthwestern University Press, 1968)Google Scholar

Mills, Charles and Pateman, Carole, Contract and Domination (Cambridge, Polity Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Ministère délégué à la Recherche, Communiqué de Presse, ‘Cellules souches embryonnaires: présentation du decret autorisant l'importation’, 19 October 2004, available at www.recherche.gouv.fr/discours/2004/decretembryon.htm

Mitchell, Robert, ‘Registered genes, patents and bio-circulation’, paper presented at the BIOS ‘Vital politics’ conference, London School of Economics, September 2003

Moine, Isabelle, Les choses hors commerce: une approche de la personne humaine juridique (Paris, LGDJ-Monchrestien, Bibliothèque de droit privé, 1997)Google Scholar

Momberger, K., ‘Breeder at law’ (2002) 11 Columbia Journal of Gender and Law127–74Google Scholar

Montgomery, Jonathan, Health Care Law (1st edn, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Morley, G. M., ‘Cord closure: can hasty clamping injure the newborn?’ (1998) Obstetrics and Gynaecology Management, JulyGoogle Scholar

Munzer, Stephen R., A Theory of Property (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munzer, Stephen R.‘An uneasy case against property rights in human body parts’ (1994) 11(2) Social Philosophy and Policy259–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munzer, Stephen R.‘The special case of property rights in umbilical cord blood for transplantation’ (1999) 51 Rutgers Law Review493–568Google Scholar

Munzer, Stephen R. (ed.), New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Munzer, Stephen R. ‘Property, patents and genetic material’ in Burley, J. and Harris, J. (eds.), A Companion to Genethics (Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 2002), pp. 438–54Google Scholar

Murray, Thomas, ‘Will new ways of creating stem cells dodge the objections?’ (2005) 35(1) Hastings Center Report8–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

National Academies, ‘Report proposes structure for national network of cord blood stem cell banks’, available at www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/04/050418095036.htm

Nelkin, Dorothy, Dangerous Diagnostics: The Social Power of Biological Information (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Nelkin, Dorothy‘Is bioethics for sale?’ (2003) 24(2) Tocqueville Review45–60Google Scholar

Nelkin, Dorothy and Lindee, Susan, The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon (New York, W. H. Freeman and Co., 1995)Google Scholar

Nuffield Council on Bioethics, Stem Cell Therapy: The Ethical Issues, A Discussion Paper (London, Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2000)

Nuffield Council on Bioethics The Ethics of Patenting DNA (London, Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2002)

Nussbaum, Martha, ‘Objectification’ (1995) 24(4) Philosophy and Public Affairs249–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Okin, Susan Moller, Women in Western Political Thought (London, Virago, 1980)Google Scholar

Okoth-Ogendo, H. W. O., ‘The tragic African commons: a century of exploration, suppression and submersion’ (2003) 1 University of Nairobi Law Journal107–17Google Scholar

Oldham, Paul, ‘The patenting of plant and animal genomes’, paper presented at the seventh workshop of the EC PropEur project, Paris, May 2006

Oliveiro, P., ‘La communication sociale des matériaux biologiques: sang, sperme, organs, cadavres’ (1993) 18 Cahiers internationaux de psychologie sociale21–51Google Scholar

Ossorio, Pilar, ‘Common heritage arguments against patenting DNA’ in Chapman, A. (ed.), Perspectives on Gene Patenting: Religion, Science and Industry in Dialogue (Washington, DC, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1999), pp. 89–108Google Scholar

Ossorio, Pilar ‘Legal and ethical issues in biotechnology patenting’ in Burley, J. and Harris, J., A Companion to Genethics (Oxford, Blackwell, 2002), pp. 408–19Google Scholar

Otten, J., Wyle, H. and Phelps, G., ‘The charitable trust as a model for genomic banks’ (2004) 350 New England Journal of Medicine85–6Google Scholar

Palsson, Gisli and Rabinow, Paul, ‘Iceland: the case of a national Human Genome Project’ (1999) 15(3) Anthropology Today14–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parfit, Tom, ‘Beauty salons fuel trade in aborted babies’, Guardian Unlimited, 17 April 2005, available at www.guardian.co.ukGoogle Scholar

Parry, Bronwyn, ‘The new Human Tissue Bill: Categorization and Definitional Issues and their Implications’ (2005) 1(1) Genomics, Society and Policy74–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pateman, Carole, The Sexual Contract (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1988)Google Scholar

Pateman, Carole ‘The fraternal social contract’ in The Disorder of Women (Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press, 1989), pp. 33–57Google Scholar

Patrick, M., Smith, A. L., Meyer, W. R. and Bashford, A., ‘Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up questionnaire’ (2001) 75 Fertility and Sterility1034–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, J., Maori Values (Palmerston North,Dunmore Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Peltonen, T., ‘Placental transfusion: advantages and disadvantages’ (1981) 137 European Journal of Pediatrics141–6Google Scholar

Penner, James, The Idea of Property in Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Plato, Laws (Paul Shorey (tr.)) in The Collected Dialogues of Plato including the Letters (Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntington (eds.), New York, Pantheon Books, 1961)Google Scholar

Plato, The Republic (Paul Shorey (tr.)) in The Collected Dialogues of Plato including the Letters (Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntington (eds.), New York, Pantheon Books, 1961)Google Scholar

Pottage, Alain, ‘The inscription of life in law: genes, patents and biopolitics’ (1998) 61 Modern Law Review740–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prendiville, W. J. and Elbourne, D., ‘Care during the third stage of labour’ in Chalmers, I., Enkin, M. and Keirse, M. J. N. C. (eds.), Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1989), pp. 1145–69Google Scholar

Prendiville, W. J., Elbourne, D. and McDonald, S., ‘Active versus expectant management in the third stage of labour’, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, issue 3, art. no. CD000007, 24 July 2000

President's Council on Bioethics, Alternative Sources of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells (Washington, DC, President's Council on Bioethics, 2005)

Proctor, S. J., Dickinson, A. M., Parekh, T. and Chapman, C., ‘Umbilical cord blood banks in the UK have proved their worth and now deserve a firmer foundation’ (2001) 323 British Medical Journal60–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quiney, Ruth, ‘Autogenesis and the absent mother: cultural fantasies of maternal space and posthuman reproduction’, paper delivered at the Open Forum on ‘Posthuman bodies’, Birkbeck, University of London, 18 March 2006

Rabe, H., Reynolds, G. and Diaz-Rossello, J., ‘Early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping in preterm infants’, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, issue 4, art. no. CD003248pub2, 18 October 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rabinow, Paul, French Modern: Norms and Forms of the Social Environment (Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Rabinow, PaulFrench DNA: Trouble in Purgatory (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Radin, Margaret J., Contested Commodities: The Trouble with Trade in Sex, Children, Body Parts and Other Things (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Ragone, Helena, Surrogate Motherhood: Conception in the Heart (Boulder, CO, Westview Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Randerson, James, ‘Rise and fall of clone king who doctored stem-cell research’, Guardian, 24 December 2005Google Scholar

Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Ist edn, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1971)Google Scholar

Remond-Gouilloud, Martin, ‘L'avenir du patrimoine,’Esprit, November 1995, p. 216Google Scholar

Resnik, David, ‘The morality of human gene patents’ (1997) 7 Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal43–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Resnik, David‘The commodification of human reproductive materials’ (1998) 24 Journal of Medical Ethics288–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Resnik, David‘Regulating the market for human eggs’ (2001) 15(1) Bioethics1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Resnik, David‘The commercialization of human stem cells: ethical and policy issues’ (2002) 10 Health Care Analysis127–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Retained Organs Commission, A Consultation Document on Unclaimed and Unidentifiable Organs and Tissue: A Possible Regulatory Framework (NHS, February 2002)

Rheenen, Patrick and Brabin, Bernard J., ‘Late umbilical cord-clamping as an intervention for reducing iron deficiency anaemia in term infants in developing and industrialised countries: a systematic review’ (2004) 24 Annals of Tropical Paediatrics3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richardson, Ruth, ‘Fearful symmetry’ in Stuart Younger, et al., Death, Dissection and the Destitute (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2001)

Ricœur, Paul, Oneself as Another (Kathleen Blamey (tr.), University of Chicago Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Réflexion faite: autobiographie intellectuelle (Paris, Editions Esprit, 1995)

Rocha, V., et al., ‘Graft-versus-host disease in children who have received a cord-blood or bone marrow transplant from an HLA-identical sibling’ (2000) 342(25) New England Journal of Medicine1846–54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rocha, V., Labopin, M., Sans, G., et al., ‘Transplants of umbilical cord blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with leukaemia’ (2004) 351 New England Journal of Medicine2276–85CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rogers, Ian and Casper, Robert F., ‘Lifeline in an ethical quagmire: umbilical cord blood as an alternative to embryonic stem cells’ (2004) 2(2) Sexuality, Reproduction and Menopause64–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Carol M., ‘The comedy of the commons: customs, commerce and inherently public property’ (1986) 53 University of Chicago Law Review742CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Carol M.Property and Persuasion: Essays on the History, Theory and Rhetoric of Ownership (Boulder, CO, Westview Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Rose, Hilary, ‘Gendered genetics in Iceland’ (2001) 20(2) New Genetics and Society119–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Hilary‘An ethical dilemma: the rise and fall of UmanGenomics – the model biotech company?’ (2004) 425 Nature123–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothstein, Mark A., ‘Expanding the ethical analysis of biobanks’ (2005) 33(1) Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics89–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Scientific Advisory Committee, Opinion Paper 2: Cord Blood Banking (London, RCOG, 2001)

Rubinstein, P., Rosenfeld, R. E., Adamson, J. W. and Stevens, C. E., ‘Stored placental blood for unrelated bone marrow reconstitution’ (1993) 81 Blood1679–90Google Scholar

Ryan, Alan, ‘Locke, labour and the purposes of God’ in Ryan, A., Property and Political Theory (Oxford, Blackwell, 1984)Google Scholar

Ryan, AlanProperty and Political Theory (Oxford, Blackwell, 1984)Google Scholar

Ryan, Alan‘Self-ownership, autonomy and property rights’ (1994) 11 Social Philosophy and Policy341CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sample, Ian, ‘Stem cell pioneer accused of faking all his research, apart from the cloned dog’, Guardian, 11 January 2006, p. 11Google Scholar

Sauer, M. V., ‘Defining the incidence of serious complications experienced by oocyte donors: a review of 1,000 cases’ (2001) 184 American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology277–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sauer, M. V.‘Egg donor solicitation: problems exist, but do abuses?’ (2001) 1(4) American Journal of Bioethics1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sauer, M. V., Paulson, R. J. and Lobo, R. A., ‘Rare occurrence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in oocyte donors’ (1996) 52 International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics259–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scheper-Hughes, Nancy, ‘Bodies for sale – whole or in parts’ (2002) 7 Body and Society1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, Ingrid and Schumann, Claudia, ‘Stem cells, therapeutic cloning, embryo research: women as raw material suppliers for science and industry’ in Herrmann, Svea Luise and Kurmann, Margaretha (eds.), Reproductive Medicine and Genetic Engineering: Women between Self-Determination and Societal Standardisation, proceedings of a conference held in Berlin, 15–17 November 2001 (Reprokult, 2002), pp. 70–9Google Scholar

Schneider, Susan Weidman, ‘Jewish women's eggs: a hot commodity in the IVF marketplace’ (2001) 26(3) Lllith22Google Scholar

Schroeder, J. L., ‘Chix nix bundle-o-stix: a feminist critique of the disaggregation of property’ (1994) 83 Michigan Law Review239CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scully, Jackie Leach, ‘Normative ethics and non-normative embodiment’, paper presented at the Feminist Approaches to Bioethics conference, Sydney, November 2004

Segal, Naomi, ‘Words, bodies and stone’, inaugural lecture delivered at the Institute of Germanic and Romance Studies, University of London, 19 April 2005

Senituli, Lopeti, ‘They came for sandalwood, now the b … s are after our genes!’, paper presented at the conference ‘Research ethics, tikanga Maori/indigenous and protocols for working with communities’, Wellington, New Zealand, 10–12 June 2004

Shiffrin, Seana Valentine, ‘Lockean arguments for private intellectual property’ in Stephen, R. Munzer (ed.), New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 138–67Google Scholar

Shiva, Vandana, Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge (Boston, South End Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Sicard, Didier (ed.), Travaux du Comité Consultatif National d'Ethique (Paris, Quadrige/Presses Universitaires de France, 2003)Google Scholar

Sigurdsson, Skuli, ‘Yin-yang genetics, or the HSD decode controversy’ (2001) 20(2) New Genetics and Society103–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simpson, Alan, Hildyard, Nicholas and Sexton, Sarah, ‘No patents on life: a briefing on the proposed EU directive on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions’, available at www.thecornerhouse.org.uk, first published September 1997, accessed 24 August 2004

Skloot, Rebecca, ‘Taking the least of you: the tissue-industrial complex’, New York Times, 16 April 2006, available at www.nytimes.com/2006/04/16/magazine/16tissuehtml, accessed 24 April 2006Google Scholar

Skolbekken, John-Arne, Ursin, Lars Oystein, Solberg, Berge, et al., ‘Not worth the paper it's written on? Informed consent and biobank research in a Norwegian context’ (2005) 15(4) Critical Public Health335–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Alyna C., ‘Intellectual property rights and the right to health: considering the case of access to medicines’ in Christian, Lenk, Nils, Hoppe and Roberto, Andorno (eds.), Ethics and Law of Intellectual Property: Current Problems in Politics, Science and Technology (Aldershot, Ashgate, 2006), ch. 3Google Scholar

Smith, Stephen A., Contract Theory (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Steinbock, Bonnie, ‘Alternative sources of stem cells’ (2005) 35(4) Hastings Center Report24–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steinbrook, Robert, ‘Egg donation and human embryonic stem-cell research’ (2006) 354 New England Journal of Medicine324–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steiner, Philippe, ‘Don du sang et don d'organes: le marché et les marchandises “fictives”’ (2001) 42(2) Revue française de sociologie357–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sterckx, Sigrid, Biotechnology, Patents and Morality (2nd edn, Aldershot, Ashgate, 2000)Google Scholar

Sterckx, Sigrid ‘Embryo stem cell patenting’, paper presented at the fifth workshop of the EC PropEur project, Bilbao, December 2005

Sterckx, Sigrid ‘Lack of access to essential drugs: a story of continuing global failure, with particular attention to the role of patents’ in Lenk, Christian, Hoppe, Nils and Andorno, Roberto (eds.), Ethics and Law of Intellectual Property: Current Problems in Politics, Science and Technology (Aldershot, Ashgate, 2006), ch. 9Google Scholar

Stock, Gregory, ‘Eggs for sale: how much is too much?’ (2001) 1(4) American Journal of Bioethics26–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stranger, Mark, Chalmers, Donald and Nicol, Dianne, ‘Capital, trust and consultation: databanks and regulation in Australia’ (2005) 15(4) Critical Public Health349–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sugarman, Jeremy, Reisner, Emily G. and Kurtzberg, Joanne, ‘Ethical issues of banking placental blood for transplantation’ (1995) 274 Journal of the American Medical Association1763–85Google Scholar

Taylor, Robert S., ‘A Kantian defense of self-ownership’ (2004) 12(1) Journal of Political Philosophy65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thambisetty, Sivaramjani, Human Genome Patents and Developing Countries (London, Department for International Development, Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, 2002)Google ScholarPubMed

Théry, Jean-François, Salat-Baroux, Frédéric and Christine, Bihan-Graf, Les lois de la bioéthique: cinq ans après (Paris, La Documentation française, 1999)Google Scholar

Dominique, Thouvénin, ‘Autour du don et de la gratuité’ (2002) Revue générale de droit médical, Numéro spécial: droit santé99–108Google Scholar

Titmuss, Richard M., The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy (Oakley, Ann and Ashton, J. (eds.), 2nd edn, London, LSE Books, 1997)Google Scholar

Tober, Diane, ‘Semen as gift, semen as goods: reproductive workers and the market in altruism’ (2001) 7 Body and Society137–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Toi Te Taiao/The Bioethics Council of New Zealand, Reflections on the Use of Human Genes in Other Organisms: Ethical, Spiritual and Cultural Dimensions (Wellington, Toi Te Taiao/The Bioethics Council of New Zealand, 2004)

Tromp, Saskia, ‘Seize the Day, Seize the Cord’, unpublished undergraduate medical dissertation (University of Maastricht, 2001)

United Kingdom Parliament, House of Commons, Select Committee on Science and Technology Fifth Report, available at www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405, accessed 20 April 2005

Varela, F., ‘Intimate distances: fragments for a phenomenology of organ transplantation’ in Thompson, E. (ed.), Between Ourselves: Second-Person Issues in the Study of Consciousness (Thorverton, Imprint Academic, 2001)Google Scholar

Waldby, Catherine, ‘Biomedicine, tissue transfer and intercorporeality’ (2002) 3(3) Feminist Theory239–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldby, Catherine and Mitchell, Robert, Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism (Durham, NC, Duke University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, The Right to Private Property (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1988)Google Scholar

Wallace, Susan and Stewart, Alison, ‘Cord blood banking: guidelines and prospects’, Cambridge Genetic Knowledge Park report, 22 November 2004, available at www.cambridgenetwork.co.uk/pooled/ articles, accessed 19 May 2005

Warren, Mary Anne, ‘The moral significance of the gene’ in Burley, J. and Harris, J. (eds.), A Companion to Genethics (Oxford, Blackwell, 2002), pp. 147–57Google Scholar

Watts, Jonathan and Semple, Ian, ‘Cloning fraud hits search for stem cell cures’, Guardian, 24 December 2005Google Scholar

Weiss, Gail, Body Images: Embodiment as Intercorporeality (London and New York, Routledge, 1999)Google Scholar

Wert, Guido, Meulen, Ruud, Mordacci, Roberto and Tallachini, Mariachiara, Ethics and Genetics: A Workbook for Practitioners and Students (Oxford, Berghahn Books, 2003)Google Scholar

Widdows, Heather, ‘The impact of new reproductive technologies on concepts of genetic relatedness and non-relatedness’ in Heather, Widdows, Itziar, Alkorta Idiakez and Aitziber, Emaldi Cirion (eds.), Women's Reproductive Rights (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), pp. 151–64Google Scholar

Wiemels, J. L., Cazzaniga, G., Daniotti, M., et al., ‘Prenatal origin of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children’ (1999) 352 Lancet1499–1503CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkinson, Stephen, ‘Commodification arguments for the legal prohibition of organ sale’ (2000) 8 Health Care Analysis189–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, Garrath, ‘Bioethics and large-scale biobanking: individualistic ethics and collective projects’ (2005) 1(2) Genomics, Society and Policy50–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, Patricia J., ‘On being the object of property’ in Kelly, D. Weisberg (ed.), Feminist Legal Theory: Foundations (Philadelphia, Temple University Press, 1992), pp. 594–602Google Scholar

Williams-Jones, Bryn, ‘History of a gene patent: tracing the development and application of commercial BRCA testing’ (2002) 10 Health Law Journal121–44Google Scholar

Winickoff, David E. and Neumann, Larissa B., ‘Towards a social contract for genomics: property and the public in the “biotrust” model’ (2005) 1(3) Genomics, Society and Policy8–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winickoff, David E. and Winickoff, Richard N., ‘The charitable trust as a model for genomic biobanks’ (2003) 349(12) New England Journal of Medicine1180–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Xitaras, Mikhail, La Propriété (Paris, Fondements de la politique, Presses Universitaires de France, 2004)Google Scholar

Yelling, A. (ed.), Common Field and Enclosure in England, 1450–1850 (Hamden, CT, Archon Books, 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, Iris Marion, On Female Body Experience: ‘Throwing like a Girl’ and Other Essays (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Younge, Gary, ‘Embryo scientist quits team over ethics fear’, Guardian, 14 November 2003, p. 19Google Scholar

Zilberstein, Moshe, Feingold, Michael and Selbel, Michelle M., ‘Umbilical cord-blood banking: lessons learned from gamete donation’ (1997) 349 Lancet642–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar