Acosta-Hughes, B. (2002) Polyeideia: The Iambi of Callimachus and the Archaic Iambic Tradition. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Acosta-Hughes, B. (2008) ‘Unwilling farewell and complex allusion (Sappho, Callimachus and Aeneid 6.458)’, in Cairns, F., Cairns, S. & Williams, F. (eds.), Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar 13: Hellenistic Greek and Augustan Latin Poetry, Flavian and Post-Flavian Latin Poetry, Greek and Roman Prose. Cambridge: 1–11.Google Scholar

Acosta-Hughes, B. (2010) Arion’s Lyre: Archaic Lyric into Hellenistic Poetry. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L. & Stephens, S. (eds.) (2011) Brill’s Companion to Callimachus. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acosta-Hughes, B. & Stephens, S. A. (eds.) (2012) Callimachus in Context: From Plato to the Augustan Poets. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1982) The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. N. & Mayer, R. G. (eds.) (2011) Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry. Oxford: 21–93.Google Scholar

Albis, R. V. (1996) Poet and Audience in the Argonautica of Apollonius. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar

Albrecht, M. von (1997) A History of Roman Literature: From Livius Andronicus to Boethius: With Special Regard to its Influence on World Literature. 2 vols. Leiden.Google Scholar

Albrecht, M. von (1999) Roman Epic: An Interpretative Introduction. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albrecht, M. von (2012) ‘Properz und die Architektur des augusteischen Rom’, in Cristofoli, Santini & Santucci 2012: 207–28.Google Scholar

Alessi, P. T. (1989) ‘Propertius: Furor, ingenium and Callimachus’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 5. Brussels: 216–32.Google Scholar

Alfonsi, L. (1942–3) ‘Nuovi appunti properziani’, RIL 76: 143–53.Google Scholar

Alfonsi, L. (1943–4) ‘Properzio e Virgilio’, RIL 77: 459–70.Google Scholar

Alfonsi, L. (1944–5a) ‘Di Properzio II, 34 e della protasi dell’ Eneide’, RFIC 22–3: 116–29.Google Scholar

Alfonsi, L. (1944–5b) ‘Sull’ Elegia II,5 di Tibullo’, RFIC 22–3: 130–7.Google Scholar

Alfonsi, L. (1954) ‘Il giudizio di Properzio sulla poesia vergiliana’, Aevum 28.3: 205–21.Google Scholar

Alfonsi, L. (1955) ‘Note properziane’, Hermes 83.3: 379–84.Google Scholar

Alfonsi, L. (1961) ‘Dalla II alla X Ecloga’, Aevum 35.3: 193–8.Google Scholar

Allen, A. W. (1950) ‘Sincerity and the Roman elegists’, CPh 45.3: 145–60.Google Scholar

Allen, A. W. (1962) ‘Sunt qui Propertium malint’, in Sullivan, J.P. (ed.), Critical Essays on Roman Literature I: Elegy and Lyric. London: 109–48.Google Scholar

Allen, G. (2000) Intertextuality. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, J. W. (1980) ‘Virgilian themes in Propertius 4.7 and 8’, CPh 75.4: 332–8.Google Scholar

Álvarez Hernández, A. R. (1997) La poética de Propercio (Autobiografía artística del ‘Calímaco romano’). Assisi.Google Scholar

Álvarez Hernández, A. R. (2005) ‘Properzio e gli archetipi ellenistici del genere elegiaco’, in Santini & Santucci 2005: 33–59.Google Scholar

Álvarez Hernández, A. R. (2014) ‘Il Virgilio dei primi libri properziani’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2014: 255–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ambühl, A. (2004) ‘Entertaining Theseus and Heracles: The Hecale and the Victoria Berenices as a diptych’, in Harder, Regtuit & Wakker 2004: 23–47.Google Scholar

Ambühl, A. (2005) Kinder und junge Helden: innovative Aspekte des Umgangs mit der literarischen Tradition bei Kallimachos (Hellenistica Groningana 9). Leuven.Google Scholar

Anagnostou-Laoutides, E. (2023) ‘Lust in lions and lovers: Hunting for civic virtue in Vergil, Propertius, and early Greek elegy’, in Keith & Myers 2023: 106–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ancona, R. & Greene, E. (eds.) (2005) Gendered Dynamics in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore, MD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, A. R. (1928) ‘Heracles and his successors: A study of a heroic ideal and the recurrence of a heroic type’, HSPh 39: 7–58.Google Scholar

Anderson, R. D., Parsons, P. J. & Nisbet, R. G. M. (1979) ‘Elegiacs by Gallus from Qaṣr Ibrîm’, JRS 69: 125–55.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. S. (1964) ‘Hercules exclusus: Propertius, IV, 9’, AJPh 85.1: 1–12.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. S. (1968) ‘Pastor Aeneas: On pastoral themes in the Aeneid’, TAPhA 99: 1–17.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. S. (1992) ‘The limits of genre (Response to Francis Cairns)’, in Galinsky 1992: 96–103.Google Scholar

Arkins, B. T. (1989) ‘Language in Propertius 4.6’, Philologus 133.1–2: 246–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P. A. & Skinner, M. B. (eds.) (2004) Vergil, Philodemus and the Augustans. Austin, TX.Google Scholar

Aronen, J. (1999a) ‘Signum Vortumni’, LTUR 4.310–11.Google Scholar

Aronen, J. (1999b) ‘Vortumnus, aedes’, LTUR 5.213–14.Google Scholar

Ash, R. (2002) ‘Epic encounters? Ancient historical battle narratives and the epic tradition’, in Levene & Nelis 2002: 253–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asper, M. (1997) Onomata allotria: Zur Genese, Struktur und Funktion poetologischer Metaphern bei Kallimachos (Hermes Einzelschrift 75). Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Asper, M. (2008) ‘Apollonius and Poetry’, in Papanghelis & Rengakos 2008: 167–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asper, M. (2011) ‘Dimensions of power: Callimachean geopoetics and the Ptolemaic Empire’, in Acosta-Hughes, Lehnus & Stephens 2011: 155–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, R. G. (ed.) (1955) P. Vergili Maronis Aenidos liber quartus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (ed.) (1960) Cicero: Pro M. Caelio Oratio. 3rd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1961) ‘Virgil, Aeneid II, 567–587’, CQ 11.2: 185–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, R. G. (ed.) (1964) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber secundus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (ed.) (1971) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber primus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (ed.) (1977) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber sextus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Avezzù, E. (2008) ‘Motivi dell’epica greca arcaica nell’elegia properziana’, in Santini & Santucci 2008: 273–92.Google Scholar

Baeza Angulo, E. F. & Buono, V. (2013) ‘La solitudine domestica delle matrone elegiache’, Ágora 15: 33–49.Google Scholar

Bailey, C. (1935) Religion in Virgil. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ball, R. J. (1975) ‘Tibullus 2.5 and Vergil’s Aeneid’, Vergilius 21: 33–50.Google Scholar

Balsdon, J. P. V. (1979) Romans and Aliens. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar

Barbantani, S. (2001) Φάτις νικηφόρος: frammenti di elegia encomiastica nell’età delle Guerre Galatiche: Supplementum Hellenisticum 958 e 969. Milan.Google Scholar

Barbantani, S. (2011) ‘Callimachus’ queens’, in Acosta-Hughes, Lehnus & Stephens 2011: 201–24.Google Scholar

Barber, E. A. (ed.) (1960) Sexti Properti carmina. 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1978) ‘Il lamento di Giuturna’, MD 1: 99–121. Eng. trans. in Barchiesi 2015: 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1979) ‘Palinuro e Caieta: due “epigrammi” Virgiliani (Aen. V 870 sg.; VII 1–4)’, Maia 31: 3–11.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1984) La traccia del modello: effetti omerici nella narrazione virgiliana. Pisa. Eng. trans. in Barchiesi 2015: xv–93.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1993) Il poeta e il principe: Ovidio e il discorso augusteo. Bari.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1994a) ‘Rappresentazioni del dolore e interpretazione nell’Eneide’, A&A 40.1: 109–24.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1994b) ‘Immovable Delos: Aeneid 3.73–98 and the Hymns of Callimachus’, CQ 44.2: 438–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1995) ‘Figure dell’intertestualità nell’epica romana’, Lexis 13: 49–67. Eng. trans. in Barchiesi 2001a: 129–40.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1997a) The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1997b) ‘Otto punti su una mappa dei naufragi’, MD 39: 209–26. Eng. trans. in Barchiesi 2001a: 141–54.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1997c) ‘Virgilian narrative: Ecphrasis’, in Martindale 1997a: 271–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2001a) Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and other Latin poets. London.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2001b) ‘The crossing’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Texts, Ideas, and the Classics: Scholarship, Theory and Classical Literature. Oxford: 142–63.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2005a) ‘Learned eyes: Poets, viewers, image makers’, in Galinsky, G. K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus. Cambridge: 281–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2005b) ‘The search for the perfect book: A PS to the new Posidippus’, in Gutzwiller 2005: 320–42.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (ed.) (2005c) Ovidio, Metamorfosi, Vol. I: Libri I–II. Milan.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2011) ‘Roman Callimachus’, in Acosta-Hughes, Lehnus & Stephens 2011: 511–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2015) Homeric Effects in Vergil’s Narrative, trans. I. Marchesi & M. Fox. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2019) ‘Virgilian narrative: Ecphrasis’, in Mac Góráin & Martindale 2019: 413–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baron, S. (2011) Strandentwining Cable: Joyce, Flaubert, and Intertextuality. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barry, M. (1981) Review of Sollertinsky & Sollertinsky (1981). Music & Letters 62.3/4: 430–2.Google Scholar

Barsby, J. A. (1974) ‘The composition and publication of the first three books of Propertius’, G&R 21.2: 128–37.Google Scholar

Barton, T. (1995) ‘Augustus and Capricorn: Astrological polyvalency and imperial rhetoric’, JRS 85: 33–51.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. (1998) ‘Ars and the Man: The politics of art in Virgil’s Aeneid’, CPh 93.4: 322–42.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. & Elsner, J. (2007) ‘Introduction: Eight ways of looking at an ekphrasis’, CPh 102.1: i–vi.Google Scholar

Basson, A. F. & Dominik, W. J. (eds.) (2003) Literature, Art, History: Studies on Classical Antiquity and Tradition in Honour of W. J. Henderson. Bern.Google Scholar

Beck, B. (2013) ‘Tying up loose ends: The metapoetics of closure in Odyssey 22’, Rosetta 13: 1–15.Google Scholar

Becker, C. (1971) ‘Die Späten Elegien des Properz’, Hermes 99.4: 449–80.Google Scholar

Benediktson, D. T. (1985) ‘Propertius’ “elegiacization” of Homer’, Maia 37: 17–26.Google Scholar

Bergmann, B. & Kondoleon, C. (eds.) (1999) The Art of Ancient Spectacle. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Bernadini Marzolla, P. (1955) ‘Tre elegie di Properzio’, Maia 7: 163–83.Google Scholar

Berry, M. (2006) ‘Hercules and Augustus: Propertius 4.9: A political reading’. MA Diss. Tasmania.Google Scholar

Berry, M. (2011) ‘Political poetics: the Bona Dea episode in Propertius 4, 9’, Latomus 70.2: 391-404.Google Scholar

Berthet, J.-F. (1980) ‘Properce et Homère’, in Thill 1980: 141–55.Google Scholar

Bettenworth, A. (2016) ‘Hoc satis in titulo … ’: Studien zu den Inschriften in der römischen Elegie. Münster.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. (2004) ‘Tarpeiae turpe sepulchrum/fabor. Il ‘mito romano’ fra discorso autorevole e discorso screditato’, in Santini & Santucci 2004: 199–230.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. (2012) ‘Properzio, Vertumno e i mores pubblici’, in Cristofoli, Santini & Santucci 2012: 99–109.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. (2015) Il dio elegante: Vertumno e la religione Romana. Turin.Google Scholar

Bigaroni, M. & Santucci, F. (eds.) (1977) Colloquium Propertianum: Atti (Assisi, 26–28 marzo 1976). Assisi.Google Scholar

Binder, G. (1971) Aeneas und Augustus: Interpretationen zum 8. Buch der Aeneis (Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 38). Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar

Binder, G. & Hamm, U. (1998) ‘Die ‘Locke der Berenike’ und der Ursprung der römischen Liebeselegie’, in Radke, A. E. (ed.), Candide Iudex: Beiträge zur augusteischen Dichtung. Stuttgart: 15–34.Google Scholar

Bing, P. (1988a) The Well-Read Muse: Past and Present in Callimachus and the Hellenistic Poets. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bing, P. (1988b) ‘Theocritus’ epigrams on the statues of ancient poets’, A&A 34.1: 117–23.Google Scholar

Bing, P. (1997) ‘Reconstructing Berenike’s Lock’, in Most, G. W. (ed.), Collecting Fragments/Fragmente sammeln. Gottingen: 78–94. Repr. in Bing 2009: 65–82.Google Scholar

Bing, P. (2009) The Scroll and the Marble: Studies in Reading and Reception in Hellenistic Poetry. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birt, T. (1882) Das antike Buchwesen in seinem Verhältniss zur Litteratur, mit Beiträgen zur Textgeschichte des Theokrit, Catull, Properz, und anderer Autoren. Berlin.Google Scholar

Bitto, G. (2016) ‘Properz 4,10 als Leerstelle’, Gymnasium 123.3: 207–31.Google Scholar

Bleisch, P. R. (1999) ‘The empty tomb at Rhoetum: Deiphobus and the problem of the past in Aeneid 6.494–547’, ClAnt 18.2: 187–226.Google Scholar

Bloom, H. (1975) A Map of Misreading. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bloom, H. (1994) The Western Canon. New York.Google Scholar

Blum, R. (1991) Kallimachos: The Alexandrian Library and the Origins of Bibliography. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Bolchazy, L. J. (1977) Hospitality in Early Rome: Livy’s Concept of its Humanizing Force. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Boldrer, F. (ed.) (1999) L’Elegia di Vertumno (Properzio 4.2). Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Boldrer, F. (2001) ‘Il mito di Vertumno tra Properzio e Ovidio’, Appunti Romani di Filologia 3: 87–111.Google Scholar

Boldrer, F. (2003) ‘Il callimachismo di Properzio nelle elegie romane: analisi di 4, 1’, in Belloni, L., De Finis, L. & Moretti, G. (eds.), L’officina ellenistica: poesia dotta e popolare in Grecia e a Roma. Trento: 399–423.Google Scholar

Boldrer, F. (2019) ‘Ovidio e Properzio (4.1 e 4.2) nel proemio delle Metamorfosi e un problema testuale in Met. 1.2 (illas/illa)’, Lexis 37: 256–79.Google Scholar

Boldrighini, F. (2014) ‘La gens Propertia e l’edilizia di età augustea ad Assisi: Il caso della Domus Musae’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2014: 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boldrighini, F. (2016) ‘Dei ed eroi della Domus Musae: Quadretti a soggetto mitologico e testi graffiti nel criptoportico della “Casa di Properzio” ad Assisi’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2016: 241–87.Google Scholar

Bonamente, G., Cristofoli, R. & Santini, C. (eds.) (2014) Properzio e l’età augustea: Cultura, storia, arte (Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Propertius: Assisi – Perugia, 25–27 May 2012). Turnhout.Google Scholar

Bonamente, G., Cristofoli, R. & Santini, C. (eds.) (2016) Le figure del mito in Properzio (Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Propertius: Assisi – Bevagna, 30 May–1 June 2014). Turnhout.Google Scholar

Bonamente, G., Cristofoli, R. & Santini, C. (eds.) (2020) I generi letterari in Properzio: modelli e fortuna (Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Conference on Propertius, Assisi – Spello, 24–27 May 2018). Turnhout.Google Scholar

Booth, J. (2006) ‘Naming names – or not: Some significant choices and suppressions in Latin poetry’, in Booth, J. & Maltby, R. (eds.), What’s in a Name? The Significance of Proper Names in Classical Latin Literature. Swansea: 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boucher, J. P. (1958) ‘L’œuvre de L. Varius Rufus d’après Properce II, 34’, RÉA 60.3–4: 307–22.Google Scholar

Boucher, J. P. (1964) ‘Properce et Callimaque’, RÉL 42: 273–6.Google Scholar

Boucher, J. P. (1965) Études sur Properce: problèmes d’inspiration et d’art. Paris.Google Scholar

Boucher, J. P. (1980) ‘Virgile et Properce’, in Le Bonniec, H. & Vallet, G. (eds.), Mélanges de Littérature et d’épigraphie latines, d’histoire ancienne et d’archéologie: Hommage à la memoire de Pierre Wuilleumier. Paris: 39–44.Google Scholar

Bowditch, L. (2009) ‘Palatine Apollo and the imperial gaze: Propertius 2.31 and 2.32’, AJPh 130.3: 401–38.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (1986) ‘Early Greek elegy, symposium, and public festival’, JRS 106: 13–35.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (2010) ‘Historical narrative in archaic and early classical Greek elegy’, in Konstan, D. & Raaflaub, K. A. (eds.), Epic and History. Malden, MA: 145–66.Google Scholar

Boyancé, P. (1950) ‘Properce aux fêtes de quartier’, RÉA 52: 64–70.Google Scholar

Boyd, B. W. (1984) ‘Tarpeia’s tomb: A note on Propertius 4.4’, AJPh 105.1: 85–6.Google Scholar

Boyd, B. W. (1992) ‘Virgil’s Camilla and the traditions of catalogue and ecphrasis (Aeneid 7.803–17)’, AJPh 113.2: 213–34.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (ed.) (1976) The Eclogues of Virgil. Melbourne.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (1986) The Chaonian Dove: Studies in the Eclogues, Georgics and Aeneid of Virgil. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (ed.) (1993a) Roman Epic. London.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (1993b) ‘The canonic text: Virgil’s Aeneid’, in Boyle 1993a: 79–107.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (1999) ‘Images of Rome’, in Perkell 1999: 148–61.Google Scholar

Brakman, D. C. (1926) ‘Propertiana’, Mnemosyne 54: 77–80.Google Scholar

Breed, B. W. (2006) Pastoral Inscriptions: Reading and Writing Virgil’s Eclogues. London.Google Scholar

Brenk, F. E. (1979) ‘Tarpeia among the Celts: Watery romance from Simylos to Propertius’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 1. Brussels: 166–74.Google Scholar

Briggs, W. W., Jr. (1980) Narrative and Simile from the Georgics in the Aeneid. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brink, C. O. (1963) Horace on Poetry: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. (ed.) (1982) Horace on Poetry: Epistles Book II: The Letters to Augustus and Florus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brown, E. L. (1963) Numeri Vergiliani: Studies in Eclogues and Georgics. Berchem.Google Scholar

Bruère, R. T. (1964) ‘The Helen episode in Aeneid 2 and Lucan’, CPh 59.4: 267–8.Google Scholar

Brugnoli, G. & Stok, F. (1991) ‘Questioni biografiche, III–V’, GIF 43: 133–50.Google Scholar

Bruno, M. (2007) ‘Cosa sognano i poeti: la rappresentazione onirico-visionaria del programma poetico’, Ὅρμος 9: 17–62.Google Scholar

Buchheit, V. (1963) Vergil über die Sendung Roms: Untersuchungen zum Bellum Poenicum und zur Aeneis. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Buchheit, V.(1965) ‘Tibull II 5 und die Aeneis’, Philologus 109.1–4: 104–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burbidge, J. (2007) ‘Self-allusion in Vergil’s Aeneid’. Diss. Oxford.Google Scholar

Burck, E. (1966) ‘Zur Komposition des vierten Buches des Properz’, WS 79: 405–27.Google Scholar

Burke, P. F. (1974) ‘The role of Mezentius in the Aeneid’, CJ 69.3: 202–9.Google Scholar

Burrow, C. (2019) Imitating Authors: Plato to Futurity. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, H. E. & Barber, E. A. (eds.) (1933) The Elegies of Propertius. Oxford.Google Scholar

Butrica, J. L. P. (1983) ‘Propertius 3.3.7–12 and Ennius’, CQ 33.2: 464–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butrica, J. L. P. (1996) ‘The Amores of Propertius: Unity and structure in Books 2–4’, ICS 21: 87–158.Google Scholar

Butrica, J. L. P. (1997) ‘Editing Propertius’, CQ 47.1: 176–208. Repr. in Greene & Welch 2012: 42–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butrica, J. L. P. (2001) ‘Apollo Actius, Apollo Leucadius: A false problem in Latin poetry’, in Joyal, M. (ed.), In Altum: Seventy-Five Years of Classical Studies in Newfoundland. St. John’s: 289–311.Google Scholar

Cadili, L., Fowler, R. L. & Herren, M. W. (2014) ‘Mythography’, in Thomas & Ziolkowski 2014: 872–5.Google Scholar

Cafagna, A. (2016) ‘I travestimenti del mito’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2016: 35–50.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (1969) ‘Propertius I,18 and Callimachus, Acontius and Cydippe’, CR 19.2: 131–4.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (1972) Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (1979) Tibullus: A Hellenistic Poet at Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (1984) ‘Propertius and the Battle of Actium (4.6)’, in Woodman & West 1984: 129–68. Repr. in Cairns 2007: 220–61.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (1989) Virgil’s Augustan Epic. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cairns, F. (1992) ‘Propertius 4.9: “Hercules exclusus” and the dimensions of genre’, in Galinsky 1992: 65–95. Repr. in Cairns 2007: 262–85.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (1996) ‘Ancient “etymology” and Tibullus: On the classification of “etymologies” and on “etymological markers”’, PCPhS 42: 24–59.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (1998) ‘Ovid Amores 1.15 and the problematic fruges of line 25’, in Schubert, W. (ed.), Ovid: Werk und Wirkung (Festgabe für Michael von Albrecht zum 65. Geburtstag). Frankfurt: 85–93. Repr. in Cairns 2007: 414–22.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (2002) ‘Propertius the historian (3.3.1–12)?’, in Levene & Nelis 2002: 25–44. Repr. in Cairns 2007: 197–211.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (2003) ‘Propertius 3.4 and the Aeneid incipit’, CQ 53.1: 309–11. Repr. in Cairns 2007: 212–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cairns, F. (2004) ‘Varius and Vergil: Two pupils of Philodemus in Propertius 2.34?’, in Armstrong, Fish, Johnston & Skinner 2004: 299–321.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (2006) Sextus Propertius: The Augustan Elegist. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (2007) Papers on Roman Elegy: 1969–2003. Bologna.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (2011) ‘Tarpeia pudicitia in Propertius 1.16.2 – and the early Roman historians’, RhM 154.2: 176–84.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (2016) Hellenistic Epigram: Contexts of Exploration. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, A. (1995) Callimachus and his Critics. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Campagna, G. (1923-4) ‘Sulla composizione di un’ elegia properziana’, AIV 83.2: 259–67.Google Scholar

Camps, W. A. (1954) ‘A note on the structure of the Aeneid’, CQ 4.3–4: 214–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camps, W. A. (1959) ‘A second note on the structure of the Aeneid’, CQ 9.1: 53–6.Google Scholar

Camps, W. A. (ed.) (1965) Propertius. Elegies, Book IV. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Camps, W. A. (ed.) (1966) Propertius. Elegies, Book III. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Camps, W. A. (ed.) (1967) Propertius. Elegies, Book II. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Camps, W. A. (1969) An Introduction to Virgil’s Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Canas, M. (2009) ‘Scribonia Caesaris et le Stemma des Scribonii Libones’, RPh 83.2: 183–210.Google Scholar

Carettoni, G. (1973) ‘Nuova serie di grandi lastre fittili “Campana”’, BA 58: 75–87.Google Scholar

Cartault, A. (1909) Tibulle et les auteurs du Corpus Tibullianum. Paris.Google Scholar

Carter, J. M. (1976) ‘Propertius 2.34C’, LCM 1: 41–4.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (2006) ‘The making of the shield: Inspiration and repression in the Aeneid’, G&R 53.2: 185–204.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (2007) ‘Correcting Aeneas’s voyage: Ovid’s commentary on Aeneid 3’, TAPhA 137.1: 181–210.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (2009) ‘Ovidian intertextuality’, in Knox, P. E. (ed.), A Companion to Ovid. Chichester: 341–54.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (2010) ‘Autoriflessività onirica nell’Eneide e nei successori epici di Virgilio’, in Scioli, E. & Walde, C. (eds.), Sub imagine somni: Nighttime Phenomena in Greco-Roman Culture. Pisa: 119–42.Google Scholar

Casey, D. (2001) ‘Sunt aliquid Manes: Homer, Plato, and Alexandrian allusion in Propertius IV 7’, CJ 96.4: 401–13.Google Scholar

Caston, R. R. (2003) ‘Rivaling the shield: Propertius 4, 6’, in Thibodeau, P. & Haskell, H. (eds.), Being There Together: Essays in Honor of Michael C. J. Putnam on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday. Afton, MN: 145–62.Google Scholar

Catanzaro, G. & Santucci, F. (eds.) (1989) Tredici Secoli di Elegia Latina. Assisi.Google Scholar

Catanzaro, G. & Santucci, F. (eds.) (2002) Properzio alle soglie del 2000: Un bilancio di fine secolo. Assisi.Google Scholar

Celentano, L. (1956) ‘Significato e valore del IV libro di Properzio’, Annali della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia dell’Università di Napoli 6: 33–68.Google Scholar

Chomse, S. (2024) ‘The rise and fall of Virgil’s sublime Carthage’, in Gale & Chahoud 2024: 164–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ciaffi, V. (1978) ‘La Iª elegia del libro IV di Properzio e l’ordinamento del libro’, in Ciaffi, V. (ed.), Scritti indetti o rari. Torino: 147–60.Google Scholar

Ciccarelli, I. (2015a) ‘Commento all’elegia II’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 396–502.Google Scholar

Ciccarelli, I. (2015b) ‘Commento all’elegia X’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 1198–1264.Google Scholar

Citroni, M. (2003) ‘Politica culturale augustea e nuovo assetto dei generi poetici latini’, in Uglione, R. (ed.), Intellettuali e potere nel mondo antico. Alessandria: 101–22.Google Scholar

Citroni, M. (2006) ‘The concept of the classical and the canons of model authors in Roman literature’, in Porter 2006a: 204–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Citroni, M. (2011) ‘Arte allusiva: Pasquali and onward’, in Acosta-Hughes, Lehnus & Stephens 2011: 566–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Citroni, M. (2015) ‘La vittoria e il tempio: interpretazione del proemio del III libro delle Georgiche’, in Günther & Fedeli 2015: 39–87.Google Scholar

Clark, M. L. (1949) ‘Rhetorical influences in the Aeneid’, G&R 18: 14–27.Google Scholar

Clark, M. L. (1964) ‘Virgil and the golden section’ (review of Duckworth 1962), CR 14.1: 43–5.Google Scholar

Clarke, J. (2003) Imagery of Colour and Shining in Catullus, Propertius, and Horace. New York.Google Scholar

Clarke, M. J., Currie, B. G. F. & Lyne, R. O. A. M. (eds.) (2006) Epic Interactions: Perspectives on Homer, Virgil, and the Epic Tradition. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clausen, W. V. (1964) ‘Callimachus and Latin poetry’, GRBS 5.3: 181–96.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. V. (1976) ‘Cynthius’, AJPh 97.3: 245–7.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. V. (1977) ‘Cynthius: An addendum’, AJPh 98.4: 362.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. V. (1987) Virgil’s Aeneid and the Tradition of Hellenistic Poetry. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. V. (ed.) (1994) Virgil: Eclogues. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clauss, J. J. (1988) ‘Vergil and the Euphrates revisited’, AJPh 109.3: 309–20.Google Scholar

Clauss, J. J. (1993) The Best of the Argonauts: The Redefinition of the Epic Hero in Book One of Apollonius’ Argonautica. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clauss, J. J. (2010) ‘From the head of Zeus: The beginnings of Roman literature’, in Clauss, J. J. & Cuypers, M. (eds.), A Companion to Hellenistic Literature. Chichester: 463–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clauss, J. J. (2016) ‘The Hercules and Cacus episode in Augustan literature: Engaging the Homeric Hymn to Hermes in light of Callimachus’ and Apollonius’ reception’, in Faulkner, A., Vergados, A. & Schwab, A. (eds.), The Reception of the Homeric Hymns. Oxford: 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clay, J. S. (2003) Hesiod’s Cosmos. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clément-Tarantino, S. (2006) ‘La poétique romaine comme hybridation féconde: Les leçons de la greffe (Virgile, Géorgiques, 2, 9–82)’, Ars Scribendi 4 (http://ars-scribendi.ens.lsh.fr/).Google Scholar

Coarelli, F. (1996) ‘Iupitter Feretrius, aedes’, LTUR 3: 135–6.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. (2003) ‘Apollo’s speech before the battle of Actium: Propertius 4.6.37–54’, in Basson & Dominik 2003: 37–45.Google Scholar

Coleman, R. (1962) ‘Gallus, the Bucolics, and the ending of the fourth Georgic’, AJPh 83.1: 55–71.Google Scholar

Coleman, R. (ed.) (1977) Vergil: Eclogues. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Coleman, R. (1999) ‘Poetic diction and poetic register’, in Adams & Mayer 1999: 21–93.Google Scholar

Conington, J. & Nettleship, H. (1883) P. Vergili Maronis Opera: The Works of Virgil, Vol. 3. 3rd edn. London.Google Scholar

Conington, J. & Nettleship, H. (1884) P. Vergili Maronis Opera: The Works of Virgil, Vol. 2. 4th edn. London.Google Scholar

Connolly, J. (2000) ‘Asymptotes of pleasure: Thoughts on the nature of Roman erotic elegy’, Arethusa 33.1: 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connor, P. J. (1978) ‘The Actian miracle: Propertius 4.6’, Ramus 7.1: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1970) ‘Il balteo di Pallante’, RFIC 98: 292–300. Rev. as ‘Il balteo di Pallante. Modelli antropologici e retorica letteraria’ in Conte 1984: 97–107. Rev. & Eng. trans. in Conte 1986a: 185–95.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1974) Memoria dei poeti e sistema letterario. Catullo, Virgilio, Ovidio, Lucano. Turin.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1978) ‘L’episodio di Elena nel secondo dell’Eneide: modelli strutturali e critica dell’autenticità’, RFIC 106: 53–62. Repr. in Conte 1984: 109–19. Eng. trans. in Conte 1986a: 196–207.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1981) ‘Lettura della decima bucolica’, in Gigante, M. (ed.), Lecturae Vergilianae I: Le Bucoliche. Naples: 347–73. Repr. as ‘Il genere e i suoi confini: Interpretazione della decima ecloga’ in Conte 1984: 13–42. Eng. trans. in Conte 1986a: 110–29.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1984) Virgilio: il genere e i suoi confini. Modelli del senso, modelli della forma in una poesia colta e ‘sentimentale’. Milan.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1986a) The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Vergil and Other Latin Poets, trans. C. P. Segal. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1986b) ‘L’amore senza elegia: I Remedia Amoris e la logica di un genere’, in Lazzarani, C. & Conte, G. B. (eds.), Ovidio: Rimedi contro l’amore. Venice: 9–53. Repr. in Conte 1991: 53–94. Eng. trans. in Conte 1994b: 35–65.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1989) Letteratura latina: Manuale storico dalle origini alla fine dell’impero romano. 2nd edn. Florence.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1991) Generi e lettori: Lucrezio, l’elegia d’amore, l’enciclopedia di Plinio. Milan. Eng. trans. as Conte 1994b.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1992a) ‘La retorica dell’imitazione come retorica della cultura: Qualche ripensamento’, FAM 2: 41–52. Engl. trans as Conte 1992b.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1992b) ‘“Rhetoric of imitation” as rhetoric of culture: Some new thoughts’, Vergilius 38: 45–55. Repr. in Conte 1994b: 129–43.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1992c) ‘Proems in the middle’, in Dunn, F. & Cole, T. (eds.), Beginnings in Classical Literature (Yale Classical Studies 29). Cambridge: 147–59.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1994a) Latin Literature: A History. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1994b) Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny’s Encyclopedia, trans. G. W. Most. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1999) Review of Hinds 1998. JRS 89: 217–20.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (2002) L’epica del sentimento. Turin. Eng. trans. as Conte 2007.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (2007) The Poetry of Pathos: Studies in Virgilian Epic, trans. E. Fantham & G. Most, ed. Harrison, S. J.. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conte, G. B. (ed.) (2009) P. Vergilius Maro Aeneis. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (2014) Dell’imitazione: furto e originalità. Pisa.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (2016) Critical Notes on Virgil: Editing the Teubner Text of the Georgics and the Aeneid. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conte, G. B. (2017) Stealing the Club from Hercules: On Imitation in Latin Poetry. Berlin.Google Scholar

Copley, F. O. (1956) Exclusus Amator: A Study in Latin Love Poetry. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Corbeill, A. (2015) Sexing the World: Grammatical Gender and Biological Sex in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Corsaro, F. (1992) ‘Sulla ridefinizione Properziana del mito di Tarpeia (Properzio IV, 4)’, SicGymn 45: 43–65.Google Scholar

Costa, C. D. N. (ed.) (1984) Lucretius, De Rerum Natura V. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cotterill, R. (1988) ‘Sunt aliquid manes: Personalities, personae and ghosts in Augustan poetry’, in Benjamin, A. (ed.), Post-Structuralist Classics. London: 227–44.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1968) ‘The structure of Propertius Book 1 and some textual consequences’, Phoenix 22.3: 250–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Courtney, E. (1969) ‘Three poems of Propertius’, BICS 16: 70–87.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1970) ‘The structure of Propertius’ Book III’, Phoenix 24.1: 48–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Courtney, E. (ed.) (1993) The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford.Google Scholar

Coutelle, É. (2005) Poétique et Métapoésie chez Properce: De l’Ars amandi à l’Ars scribendi. Louvain.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coutelle, É. (2012) ‘Properce IV, 1, Horos et Horace’, Latomus 71.1: 63–86.Google Scholar

Coutelle, É. (ed.) (2015) Properce, Élégies, livre IV. Brussels.Google Scholar

Craig, B. J. M. (2004) ‘Genre and generic consciousness’. M.Litt. Diss. Dublin.Google Scholar

Cristofoli, R. (2005) ‘Properzio e la battaglia di Azio’, in Santini & Santucci 2005: 187–205.Google Scholar

Cristofoli, R. (2008) ‘Antonio e Cleopatra nell’ Eneide e nell’elegia di Properzio’, in Santini & Santucci 2008: 193–212.Google Scholar

Cristofoli, R. (2016) ‘Giove Feretrio in Properzio: storia e mito’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2016: 209–39.Google Scholar

Cristofoli, R., Santini, C. & Santucci, F. (eds.) (2012) Properzio fra tradizione e innovazione (Atti del convegno internazionale, Assisi – Spello, 21–23 maggio 2010). Assisi.Google Scholar

Cucchiarelli, A. (ed.) (2012) Publio Virgilio Marone: Le Bucoliche. Rome.Google Scholar

Culpepper Stroup, S. (2010) Catullus, Cicero, and a Society of Patrons: The Generation of the Text. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cuomo, S. (2001) Ancient Mathematics. London.Google Scholar

Curran, L. C. (1968) ‘Propertius 4.11: Greek Heroines and Death’, CP 63.2: 134–9.Google Scholar

Currie, H. MacL. (1973) ‘Propertius IV. 8: A reading’, Latomus 32.3: 616–22.Google Scholar

Curtis, L. (2019) ‘Elegiac women and the epiphanic gaze: The case of Propertius’ Cynthia’, CPh 114.3: 406–29.Google Scholar

Cusset, C. (1999) La muse dans la bibliothèque: Réécriture et intertextualité dans la poésie alexandrine. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dällenbach, L. (1989) The Mirror in the Text, trans. J. Whiteley & E. Hughes. Chicago.Google Scholar

Dalzell, A. (1980) ‘Homeric themes in Propertius’, Hermathena 129: 29–36.Google Scholar

Damsté, P. H. (1928) ‘De Propertio elegiarum libro IV’, Mnemosyne 56.2: 214–19.Google Scholar

Danesi Marioni, G. (1979) ‘Aspetti dell’espressività properziana nel IV libro’, SIFC 51: 103–30.Google Scholar

D’Anna, G. (1979–80) ‘Gli inizi della fortuna di Virgilio’, Sileno 5–6: 373–85.Google Scholar

D’Anna, G. (1983) ‘Il rapporto di Properzio con Virgilio: Una sottile polemica col classicismo augusteo’, in Vivona 1983: 45–57.Google Scholar

D’Anna, G. (1986) ‘Qualche considerazione sui rapporti di Tibullo con Virgilio e Orazio’, Atti del Convegno internazionale di studi su Albio Tibullo (Roma – Palestrina, 10–13 maggio 1984). Rome: 29–45.Google Scholar

Davis, J. T. (1977) Dramatic Pairings in the Elegies of Propertius and Ovid. Bern.Google Scholar

Day, A. A. (1938) The Origins of Latin Love Elegy. Oxford.Google Scholar

DeBrohun, J. B. (2003) Roman Propertius and the Reinvention of Elegy. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dee, J. H. (1974a) ‘Propertius 4.2: Callimachus Romanus at Work’, AJPh 95.1: 43–55.Google Scholar

Dee, J. H. (1974b) ‘Arethusa to Lycotas: Propertius 4.3’, TAPhA 104: 81–96.Google Scholar

Dee, J. H. (1978) ‘Elegy 4.8: A Propertian comedy’, TAPhA 108: 41–53.Google Scholar

DeForest, M. (1994) Apollonius’ Argonautica: A Callimachean Epic. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Defosse, P. (ed.) (2002) Hommages à Carl Deroux 1: Poésie. Brussels.Google Scholar

Dekel, E. (2012) Virgil’s Homeric Lens. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Del Mastro, G. (2014) Titoli e annotazioni bibliologiche nei pairigreci di Ercolano (Cronache Ercolanesi Suppl. 5). Naples.Google Scholar

Den Boeft, J. (2008) ‘Post Stygias aliquid seruabitur undas: The inhabitants of Propertius’ Hades’, in Santini & Santucci 2008: 313–33.Google Scholar

Dench, E. (2005) Romulus’ Asylum: Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennis, G. (1848) The Cities and Cemeteries of Etruria. London.Google Scholar

Depew, M. (1998) ‘Delian hymns and Callimachean allusion’, HSPh 98: 155–82.Google Scholar

Depew, M. & Obbink, D. (eds.) (2000) Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Deremetz, A. (1986) ‘L’élégie de Vertumne: l’oeuvre trompeuse’, RÉL 64: 116–49.Google Scholar

Deschamps, L. (1980) ‘Properce et son double ou l’impossible coïncidence’, Ktèma 5: 89–98.Google Scholar

Deschamps, L. (1981) ‘Aemulatio et latinitas chez Properce’, in Colloquium Propertianum secundum (Assisi, 9–11 November 1979): Atti. Assisi: 101–20.Google Scholar

Deschamps, L. (1987) ‘Properce et Varron de Reate’, in Freyburger 1987: 85–97.Google Scholar

Desmond, M. (1993) ‘When Dido reads Vergil: Gender and intertextuality in Ovid’s Heroides 7’, Helios 20.1: 56–68.Google Scholar

Dieterich, A. (1900) ‘Die Widmungselegie des letzten Buches des Properz’, RhM 55: 191–221.Google Scholar

Diggle, J., Hall, J. B. & Jocelyn, H. D. (eds.) (1989) Studies in Latin Literature and its Tradition in Honour of C. O. Brink (PCPhS Suppl. 15). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dimundo, R. (1989) ‘Properzio 4,7: Dalla variante di un modello letterario alla costante di un’ unità tematica’, in Catanzaro & Santucci 1989: 273–81.Google Scholar

Dimundo, R. (ed.) (1990) Properzio 4,7: Dalla variante di un modello letterario alla costante di una unità tematica. Bari.Google Scholar

Dimundo, R. (2000) L’elegia allo specchio: Studi sul I libro degli Amores di Ovidio. Bari.Google Scholar

Dimundo, R. (2002) ‘Properzio e gli Augustei’, in Catanzaro & Santucci 2002: 295–318.Google Scholar

Dimundo, R. (ed.) (2003) Ovidio: Lezioni d’Amore: saggio di commento al I libro dell’Ars amatoria. Bari.Google Scholar

Dimundo, R. (2011) ‘L’ignobile morte della lena e il riscatto del poeta oppresso (Prop. 4,5,1–4; 67–78)’, Euphrosyne 39: 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dimundo, R. (2012) ‘Properzio 4,7: Personaggi, intersezioni letterarie, moduli stilistici’, RFIC 140.2: 331–59.Google Scholar

Dimundo, R. (2015a) ‘Commento all’elegia III’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 503–91.Google Scholar

Dimundo, R. (2015b) ‘Commento all’elegia V’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 713–98.Google Scholar

Dimundo, R. (2015c) ‘Commento all’elegia VII’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 901–1004.Google Scholar

Dinter, M. (2005) ‘Epic and epigram: Minor heroes in Virgil’s Aeneid’, CQ 55:1: 153–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dion, J. (1997) ‘L’architecture de l’œuvre de Properce’, RÉL 75: 155–74.Google Scholar

Dominicy, M. (2007) ‘De la métrique verbale à l’établissement du texte: Sur trois vers de Properce (IV, 3, 51; IV, 7, 85; IV, 10, 31)’, LÉC 75.3: 227–48.Google Scholar

Dominicy, M. (2009) ‘Properce, 4, 7, 23–26’, MH 66.3: 129–40.Google Scholar

Dominicy, M. (2010) ‘Propertius 4.5.19–21’, RhM 153.2: 144–87.Google Scholar

Dominicy, M. (2015) ‘Notes critiques sur les élégies IV, 4 et IV, 5 de Properce’, AC 84: 121–40.Google Scholar

Dominik, W. J. (2003) ‘Following in whose footsteps? The epilogue to Statius’ Thebaid’, in Basson & Dominik 2003: 91–109.Google Scholar

Dornseiff, F. (1936) ‘Die römischen Dichter heillos interpoliert?’, Hermes 71.4: 458–65.Google Scholar

Drew, D. L. (1924) ‘Virgil’s marble temple (Georgics III 10–39)’, CQ 18.3–4: 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drew, D. L. (1927) The Allegory of the Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Drinkwater, M. O. (2013) ‘The woman’s part: The speaking beloved in Roman elegy’, CQ 63.1: 329–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duckworth, G. E. (1954) ‘The architecture of the Aeneid’, AJPh 75.1: 1–15.Google Scholar

Duckworth, G. E. (1957) ‘The Aeneid as a trilogy’, TAPhA 88: 1–10.Google Scholar

Duckworth, G. E. (1962) Structural Patterns and Proportions in Vergil’s Aeneid: A Study in Mathematical Composition. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dué, C. (2001) ‘Sunt aliquid manes: Homer, Plato, and Alexandrian allusion in Propertius IV 7’, CJ 96.4: 401–13.Google Scholar

Dué, C. (2002) Homeric Variations on a Lament by Briseis. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar

Dufallo, B. (2007) The Ghosts of the Past: Latin Literature, the Dead, and Rome’s Transition to a Principate. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar

Dufallo, B. (2013) The Captor’s Image: Greek Culture in Roman Ecphrasis. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dumézil, G. (1951) ‘Propertiana’, Latomus 10.3: 289–302.Google Scholar

Dumézil, G. (1974) Mythe et épopée, Vol. 1: L’idéologie des trois fonctions dans les épopées des peuples indo-européens. 2nd edn. Paris.Google Scholar

Du Quesnay, I. M. Le, M. (1995) ‘Horace, Odes 4.5: Pro reditu Imperatoris Caesaris Divi filii Augusti’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Homage to Horace: A Bimillenary Celebration. Oxford: 128–87.Google Scholar

Eden, P. T. (ed.) (1975) A Commentary on Virgil, Aeneid VIII. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edmunds, L. (2001) Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (1993) The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, C. (1996) Writing Rome: Textual Approaches to the City. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (2007) Death in Ancient Rome. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. (1990) ‘Chalcidico versu’, AC 59: 203–8.Google Scholar

Effe, B. (2002) ‘Hercules fervidus ira: ein Motiv der Aeneis und seine Rezeption bei Properz und Ovid’, Hermes 130.2: 164–75.Google Scholar

Eisenhut, W. (1956) ‘Die Einleitungsverse der Elegie IV 6 des Properz’, Hermes 84.1: 121–8. Repr. in Eisenhut 1975: 302–14.Google Scholar

Eisenhut, W. (ed.) (1975) Properz. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Eliot, T. S. (1920) ‘Tradition and the individual talent’, in The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism. London. 42–53.Google Scholar

Eliot, T. S. (1945) What Is a Classic? An Address Delivered before the Virgil Society on the 16th of October, 1944. London.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (ed.) (1878) Catulli Veronensis Liber. Oxford.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. (ed.) (1996) Art and Text in Roman Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Enk, P. J. (ed.) (1946) Sex. Propertii Elegiarum liber I (Monobiblos). 2 vols. Leiden.Google Scholar

Enk, P. J. (ed.) (1962) Sex. Propertii Elegiarum liber secundus. 2 vols. Leiden.Google Scholar

Erskine, A. (2001) Troy Between Greece and Rome: Local Tradition and Imperial Power. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, J. D. (1992) The Art of Persuasion: Political Propaganda from Aeneas to Brutus. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Evans, J. D. (2009) ‘Prostitutes in the portico of Pompey? A reconsideration’, TAPhA 139.1: 123–45.Google Scholar

Evans, S. (1971) ‘Odyssean echoes in Propertius IV.8’, G&R 18.1: 51–3.Google Scholar

Fabre-Serris, J. (2001) ‘Deux réponses de Tibulle à Virgile: Les élégies II, 1 et II, 5’, RÉL 79: 140–51.Google Scholar

Fabre-Serris, J. (2009a) ‘Explorations génériques au livre IV de Properce: Des voix nouvelles dans l’élégie: Quelques réflexions sur les poèmes 7 et 9’, in Van Mal-Maeder, D. K., Burnier, A., Núñez, L. & Bertholet, F. (eds.), Jeux de voix: énonciation, intertextualité et intentionnalité dans la littérature antique. Bern: 157–73.Google Scholar

Fabre-Serris, J. (2009b) ‘Sulpicia: An/other female voice in Ovid’s Heroides: A new reading of Heroides 4 and 15’, Helios 36.2: 149–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fabre-Serris, J. (2009c) ‘Le désir au féminin: D’une “Lucrèce” à une autre: Sur les réceptions élégiaques d’une adaptation tibulléenne de Tite-Live’, Dictynna 6: 17–35.Google Scholar

Fabre-Serris, J. (2011) ‘Élégie érotique et discours satirique chez Properce’, MD 67: 51–78.Google Scholar

Fabre-Serris, J. (2023) ‘Generic polemic in the Bucolics: Vergil, Gallus, and remedia amoris’, in Keith & Myers 2023: 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fabre-Serris, J. (2024) ‘Roman topography, politics and gender: the cult of Bona Dea in Propertius 4.9 – an answer to Aeneid 8?’, in Gale & Chahoud 2024: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantazzi, C. (1966) ‘Virgilian pastoral and Roman love poetry’, AJPh 87.2: 171–91.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1972) Comparative Studies in Republican Latin Imagery. Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, E. (1997) ‘Images of the city: Propertius’ new-old Rome’, in Habinek, T. & Schiesaro, A. (eds.), The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: 122–35. Repr. in Greene & Welch 2012: 302–19.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2014) ‘Antiquarianism’, in Thomas & Ziolkowski 2014: 96–8.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. (2003) ‘Pastoral love and “elegiac” love, from Greece to Rome’, LICS 2.3: 1–11.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. & Hunter, R. L. (2004) Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Faraone, C. A. (2008) The Stanzaic Architecture of Early Greek Elegy. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. Oxford.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1999) ‘The Ovidian corpus: Poetic body and poetic text’, in Hardie, Barchiesi & Hinds 1999: 127–41.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2005) ‘Intention and intertext’, Phoenix, 59.1/2: 98–111.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2010) ‘Vergil’s detractors’, in Farrell & Putnam 2010: 435–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrell, J. (2012) ‘Calling out the Greeks: Dynamics of the elegiac canon’, in Gold 2012: 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrell, J. (2021) Juno’s Aeneid: A Battle for Heroic Identity. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. & Putnam, M. C. J. (eds.) (2010) A Companion to Vergil’s Aeneid and its Tradition. Malden, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faulkner, A. (2011) ‘Introduction: Modern scholarship on the Homeric Hymns: Foundational issues’, in Faulkner, A. (ed.), The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays. Oxford: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fay, L. E. (1980) ‘Shostakovich versus Volkov: Whose Testimony?’, Russian Review 39.4: 484–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fay, L. E. (2000) Shostakovich: A Life. New York.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (ed.) (1965) Properzio. Elegie, Libro IV. Bari.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (1974) ‘Properzio 1,3: Interpretazione e proposte sull’origine dell’elegia latina’, MH 31.1: 23–41.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (ed.) (1980a) Properzio: Il Primo Libro Delle Elegie. Florence.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (1980b) ‘Properce et la tradition hellénistique’, in Thill 1980: 131–9.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (1987a) ‘Properzio, fra culto del testo tradito e caccia alia corruttela’, in Freyburger 1987: 107–12. Trans. A. Talleur, ‘Propertius: Between the cult of the transmitted text and the hunt for corruption’, in Greene & Welch 2012: 31–41.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (1987b) ‘Acanthis e la sete dei morti (Prop. 4,5)’, in Raffaelli, R. (ed.), Rappresentazioni della morte. Urbino: 91–129.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (ed.) (1992) ‘Dal testo ellenistico al testo elegiaco: Ripresa e trasformazione dei codici letterari’, Aevum(ant) 5: 245–57.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (1994) ‘Ideologia augustea e poesia: Il mito di Ercole e Caco in Properzio’, in Rosen, K. (ed.), Macht und Kultur im Rom der Kaiserzeit. Bonn: 109–19.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2002) ‘Le fonti’, in Catanzaro & Santucci 2002: 251–72.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (ed.) (2005a) Properzio, Elegie Libro II. Leeds.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2005b) ‘Properzio e la poesia greca prealessandrina’, in Santini & Santucci 2005: 3–32.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2008) ‘Killing Cynthia: Costruzione e decostruzione della donna elegiaca’, in Santini & Santucci 2008: 3–38.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2012) ‘Il IV libro delle elegie fra l’Eneide virgiliana e l’ultima produzione lirica oraziana’, in Cristofoli, Santini & Santucci 2012: 3–18.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2014) ‘Da Cinzia a Cornelia’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2014: 373–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2015a) ‘Introduzione: in cerca di nuove vie per la poesia elegiaca’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 65–134.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2015b) ‘Commento all’elegia I’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 141–395.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2015c) ‘Commento all’elegia IV’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 592–712.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2015d) ‘Commento all’elegia VI’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 799–900.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2015e) ‘Commento all’elegia VIII’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 1005–1101.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2015f) ‘Commento all’elegia IX’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 1102–97.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2015g) ‘Commento all’elegia XI’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 1265–1410.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2015h) ‘La sezione troiana di Prop. 4.1 alla luce dell’epos virgiliano’, in Günther & Fedeli 2015: 135–68.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2016a) ‘Cantare le gesta del principe: Azio, dal 31 a.C. a 15 anni dopo’, Maia 68.2: 231–44.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2016b) ‘Le ambiguità del mito’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2016: 11–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2020) ‘Properzio e l’epos virgiliano: dall’annuncio al ricordo’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2020: 127–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fedeli, P. (ed.) (2021–2) Properzio: Elegie. 2 vols. Milan.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P., Dimundo, R. & Ciccarelli, I. (eds.) (2015) Properzio: Elegie, Libro IV. 2 vols. Nordhausen.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1984) ‘The reconciliation of Juno’, CQ 34.1: 179–94. Repr. in Harrison 1990: 339–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1986) ‘History and revelation in Vergil’s underworld’, PCPhS 32: 1–24.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1987) ‘Following after Hercules, in Virgil and Apollonius’, PVS 18: 47–85.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1991) The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1998) Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (2007) Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (2016) ‘Horace and the literature of the past: Lyric, epic, and history in Odes 4’, in Delignon, B., Le Meur, N. & Thévenaz, O. (eds.), La poésie lyrique dans la cité antique: les Odes d’Horace au miroir de la lyrique grecque archaïque. Paris: 295–312.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. & Nelis, D. (2005) ‘Two Virgilian acrostics: Certissima signa?’, CQ 55.2: 644–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Felber, H., Wiesehöfer, J. & Wagner-Hasel, B. (2005) ‘Hospitality’, in Cancik, H. & Schneider, H. (eds.), Brill’s New Pauly, Vol. 6. Leiden: 528–32.Google Scholar

Feldherr, A. (1999) ‘Putting Dido on the map: Genre and geography in Vergil’s underworld’, Arethusa 32.1: 85–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldherr, A. (2014) ‘Viewing myth and history on the shield of Aeneas’, CA 33.2: 281–318.Google Scholar

Fernandelli, M. (1997) ‘“Serpent Imagery” e tragedia greca nel II libro dell’Eneide’, Orpheus 18.1: 141–56.Google Scholar

Fish, J. (2004) ‘Anger, Philodemus’ Good King, and the Helen Episode of Aeneid 2.567–589: A new proof of authenticity from Herculaneum’, in Armstrong, Fish, Johnston & Skinner 2004: 111–38.Google Scholar

Flach, D. (1967) Das literarische Verhältnis von Horaz und Properz. Giessen.Google Scholar

Flach, D. (ed.) (2011a) Elegien: Lateinisch und deutsch. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Flach, D. (ed.) (2011b) Elegien: Kommentar. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Flaschenriem, B. L. (1998) ‘Speaking of women: “Female voice” in Propertius’, Helios 25.1: 49–64.Google Scholar

Fletcher, G. B. A. (1989) ‘Further Propertiana’, Latomus 48.2: 354–9.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (2000) ‘The tradition of the Spolia Opima: M. Claudius Marcellus and Augustus’, ClAnt 19.1: 34–64.Google Scholar

Fowler, A. (1982) Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1983) ‘An acrostic in Vergil (Aeneid 7. 601–604)?’, CQ 33.1: 298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1991) ‘Narrate and describe: The problem of ekphrasis’, JRS 81: 25–35. Repr. in Fowler 2000: 64–85.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1997a) ‘On the shoulders of giants: Intertextuality and classical studies’, MD 39: 13–34. Repr. in Fowler 2000: 115–37.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1997b) ‘Second thoughts on closure’, in Roberts, Dunn & Fowler 1997: 3–22. Repr. in Fowler 2000: 284–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1998) ‘Opening the Gates of War: Aeneid 7.601–40’, in Stahl 1998: 155–74. Repr. in Fowler 2000: 173–92.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (2000) Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, M. (1996) Roman Historical Myths: The Regal Period in Augustan Literature. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, M. (1999) ‘Propertius 4.9 and the toils of historicism’, MD 43: 157–76.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1957) Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fraschetti, A. (2004) ‘Tarpeia ambigua vestale’, in Santini & Santucci 2004: 117–30.Google Scholar

Fratantuono, L. M. (2019) ‘Alma Phoebe: Lunar references in Virgil’s Aeneid’, GLB 24.1: 61–79.Google Scholar

Fratantuono, L. M. & Smith, R. A. (eds.) (2018) Virgil, Aeneid 8: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freudenburg, K. (2014) ‘Recusatio as political theatre: Horace’s letter to Augustus’, JRS 104: 105–32.Google Scholar

Freyburger, G. (ed.) (1987) De Virgile à Jacob Balde: Hommage à Mme Andrée Thill (BFLM 15). Paris.Google Scholar

Frischer, B. (1983) ‘Inceptive quoque and the introduction medias in res in classical and early medieval Latin literature’, Glotta 61.3/4: 236–51.Google Scholar

Fuhrer, T. (1992) Die Auseinandersetzung mit den Chorlyrikern in den Epinikien des Kallimachos. Basel.Google Scholar

Fuhrer, T. (2023) ‘National traditions’, in Gibson & Whitton 2023: 447–515.Google Scholar

Fuhrer, T., Mundt, F. & Stenger, J. (eds.) (2015) Cityscaping: Constructing and Modelling Images of the City. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fulkerson, L. (2005) The Ovidian Heroine as Author: Reading, Writing, and Community in the Heroides. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fusi, A. (2016) ‘Un verso callimacheo di Virgilio (Aen. 8.685): Nuovi argomenti a favore di una congettura negletta’, Lexis 34: 217–48.Google Scholar

Gagliardi, P. (2012) ‘Virgilio, Properzio e Gallo: A proposito di Virg. ecl. 10, 46–49 e Prop. 1, 8’, RÉL 90: 147–63.Google Scholar

Gagliardi, P. (2015) ‘Formosus in Virgilio e dintorni’, Eirene 51.1–2: 45–58.Google Scholar

Gaisser, J. H. (1983) ‘Amor, rura and militia in three elegies of Tibullus (1.1, 1.5 and 1.10)’, Latomus 42.1: 58–72.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (1997) ‘Propertius 2, 7: Militia amoris and the ironies of elegy’, JRS 87: 77–91. Repr. in Greene & Welch 2012: 273–301.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (ed.) (2000) Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gale, M. R. (2003) ‘Poetry and the backward glance in Virgil’s Georgics and Aeneid’, TAPhA 133.2: 323–52.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (ed.) (2004) Latin Epic and Didactic Poetry: Genre, Tradition and Individuality. Swansea.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (2007) ‘Lucretius and previous poetic traditions’, in Gillespie & Hardie 2007: 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gale, M. R. (2019) ‘Name puns and acrostics in didactic poetry: Reading the universe’, in Canevaro, L. G. & O’Rourke, D. (eds.), Didactic Poetry of Greece, Rome and Beyond: Knowledge, Power, Tradition. Swansea: 123–50.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (2024) ‘Poetic and imperial spaces in Propertius, Books 1–3’, in Gale & Chahoud 2024: 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gale, M. R. & Chahoud, A. (eds.) (2024) The Augustan Space: The Poetics of Geography, Topography and Monumentality. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1966) ‘The Hercules–Cacus episode in Aeneid VIII’, AJPh 87.1: 18–51.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1972) The Herakles Theme. Totowa, NJ.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1976) Review of George 1974. Latomus 35: 900–2.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1988) ‘The anger of Aeneas’, AJPh 109.3: 321–48.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (ed.) (1992) The Interpretation of Roman Poetry: Empiricism or Hermeneutics? Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1996) Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (2002) Review of Zwierlein 1999. Gnomon 74.8: 685–7.Google Scholar

Ganiban, R. T. (2007) Statius and Virgil: The Thebaid and the Reinterpretation of the Aeneid. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garani, M. (2007) ‘Propertius’ temple of Jupiter Feretrius and the spolia opima (4.10): A poem not to be read?’, AC 76: 99–117.Google Scholar

Garani, M. (2011) ‘Revisiting Tarpeia’s myth in Propertius (IV, 4)’, LICS 10.3: 1–22.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. H. (2013) Gendering Time in Augustan Love Elegy. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gazeau, M. (2010) ‘Les métamorphoses de Vertumne ou La recusatio propertienne de tous les récits’, RÉL 88: 137–55.Google Scholar

Gazeau, M. (2017) Le tombeau de Cynthia: Mythes, fictions et ironie dans le livre IV des Élégies de Properce. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gazich, R. (1995) ‘Exemplum’ ed esemplarità in Properzio. Milan.Google Scholar

Gazich, R. (1997) ‘Moenia disponere: Properzio, Callimaco e la città augustea’, Aevum(ant) 10: 289–336.Google Scholar

Gee, E. (2000) Ovid, Aratus, and Augustus: Astronomy in Ovid’s Fasti. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Genette, G. (1997) Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree, trans. C. Newman & C. Doubinsky. Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar

George, E. V. (1974) Aeneid VIII and the Aetia of Callimachus. Leiden.Google Scholar

Gercke, A. (1913) Die Entstehung der Aeneis. Berlin.Google Scholar

Gerressen, W. (1970) Tibulls Elegie 2, 5 und Vergils Aeneis. PhD diss. Cologne.Google Scholar

Geymonat, M. (1993) ‘Callimachus at the end of Aeneas’ narration’, HSPh 95: 323–31.Google Scholar

Giangrande, G. (1970) ‘Hellenistic poetry and Homer’, AC 39.1: 46–77.Google Scholar

Giangrande, G. (1981) ‘Propertius, Callimachus Romanus?’, in Colloquium Propertianum secundum (Assisi, 9–11 novembre1979): Atti. Assisi: 147–67.Google Scholar

Giardina, G. (ed.) (2005) Properzio, Elegie: Edizione critica e traduzione. Rome.Google Scholar

Giardina, G. (ed.) (2010) Properzio, Elegie (Testi e commenti 25). Pisa.Google Scholar

Gibson, C. A. (ed.) (2008) Libanius’s Progymnasmata: Model Exercises in Greek Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. (1999) ‘Aeneas as hospes in Vergil, Aeneid 1 and 4’, CQ 49.1: 184–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, R. K. (2002) ‘“Cf. e.g.”: A typology of “parallels” and the function of commentaries on Latin poetry’, in Gibson, R. K. & Kraus, C. S. (eds.), The Classical Commentary: Histories, Practices, Theory. Leiden: 331–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, R. K. (ed.) (2003) Ovid: Ars Amatoria Book 3. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. (2007) Excess and Restraint: Propertius, Horace, and Ovid’s Ars Amatoria. London.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. (2018) ‘Propertius and the unstructured self’, in Frangoulidis, S. & Harrison, S. (eds.), Life, Love and Death in Latin Poetry. Berlin: 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, R. K. & Whitton, C. (eds.) (2023) The Cambridge Critical Guide to Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gigante Lanzara, V. (1990) ‘Virgilio e Properzio’, in Gigante, M. (ed.), Virgilio e gli Augustei. Naples: 111–76.Google Scholar

Gillespie, S. & Hardie, P. R. (eds.) (2007) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giusti, E. (2018) Carthage in Virgil’s Aeneid: Staging the Enemy under Augustus. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gladhill, B. & Myers, M. Y. (eds.) (2020) Walking Through Elysium: Vergil’s Underworld and the Poetics of Tradition. Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gold, B. K. (1993) ‘“But Ariadne was never there in the first place”: Finding the female in Roman poetry’, in Rabinowitz, N. S. & Richlin, A. (eds.), Feminist Theory and the Classics. New York: 75–101.Google Scholar

Gold, B. K. (2006) ‘How women (re)act in Roman love poetry: Inhuman she-wolves and unhelpful mothers in Propertius’ elegies’, Helios 33.2: 165–87.Google Scholar

Gold, B. K. (2007) ‘The natural and unnatural silence of women in the Elegies of Propertius’, Antichthon 41: 54–72. Repr. in Greene & Welch 2012: 355–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gold, B. K. (ed.) (2012) A Companion to Roman Love Elegy. Malden, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldschmidt, N. (2013) Shaggy Crowns: Ennius’ Annales and Virgil’s Aeneid. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodyear, F. R. D. (1977) ‘The Copa: A text and commentary’, BICS 24: 117–31.Google Scholar

Goold, G. P. (ed.) (1967) ‘Noctes Propertianae’, HSPh 71: 59–106.Google Scholar

Goold, G. P. (1970) ‘Servius and the Helen Episode’, HSPh 74: 101–68. Repr. in Harrison 1990: 60–126.Google Scholar

Goold, G. P. (1988) ‘On editing Propertius’, in Horsfall, N. (ed.), Vir bonus discendi peritus: Studies in Celebration of Otto Skutsch’s Eightieth Birthday (BICS suppl. 51). London: 27–38.Google Scholar

Goold, G. P. (1989) ‘Problems in editing Propertius’, in Grant, J. N. (ed.), Editing Greek and Latin Texts. New York: 97–119.Google Scholar

Goold, G. P. (ed.) (1990) Propertius: Elegies. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (2005) ‘Virgil’s Sibyl and the “many mouths” cliché (Aen. 6.625–7)’, CQ 55.1: 170–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gowers, E. (2011) ‘Trees and family trees in the Aeneid’, ClAnt 30.1: 87–118.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (ed.) (2012) Horace, Satires Book 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (2016) ‘Dido and the owl’, in Mitsis, P. & Ziogas, I. (eds.), Wordplay and Powerplay in Latin Poetry. Berlin: 107–30.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (2020) ‘Why isn’t Homer in Vergil’s underworld? – and other notable absences’, in Gladhill & Myers 2020: 206–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graf, F. (2014) ‘Myth and religion’, in Thomas & Ziolkowski 2014: 869–72.Google Scholar

Gransden, K. W. (ed.) (1976a) Virgil Aeneid Book VIII. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gransden, K. W. (1976b) Review of George 1974. CR 26.2: 183–4.Google Scholar

Gransden, K. W. (1985) ‘The fall of Troy’, G&R 32.1: 60–72.Google Scholar

Graziosi, B. & Haubold, J. H. (eds.) (2010) Homer, Iliad Book VI. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Green, S. J. (ed.) (2004a) Ovid, Fasti I: A Commentary. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, S. J. (2004b) ‘Contextualization and textual criticism: Making sense of character in Propertius 4.4 and Ovid, Heroides 1’, CW 97.4: 363–72.Google Scholar

Greene, E. (1998) The Erotics of Domination: Male Desire and the Mistress in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Greene, E. (2005) ‘Gender identity and the elegiac hero in Propertius 2.1’, in Ancona & Greene 2005: 61–78.Google Scholar

Greene, E. (2012) ‘Gender and elegy’, in Gold 2012: 357–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greene, E. & Welch, T. S. (eds.) (2012) Propertius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1977) ‘Propertius and Antony’, JRS 67: 17–26.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1985) Latin Poets and Roman Life. London.Google Scholar

Griffith, R. D. (1995) ‘Catullus’ Coma Berenices and Aeneas’ farewell to Dido’, TAPhA 125: 47–59.Google Scholar

Griffiths, A. (2002) ‘The Odes: Just where do you draw the line?’, in Woodman, T. & Feeney, D. C. (eds.), Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace. Cambridge: 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffiths, F. T. (1979) Theocritus at Court. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grillo, L. (2011) ‘Leaving Troy and Creusa: Reflections on Aeneas’ flight’, CJ 106.1: 43–68.Google Scholar

Grimal, P. (1945) ‘Notes sur Properce I: la composition de l’élégie à Vertumne’, RÉL 23: 110–19.Google Scholar

Grimal, P. (1948) ‘La promenade d’Évandre et Énée à la lumière des fouilles récentes’, RÉA 50: 348–51.Google Scholar

Grimal, P. (1952) ‘Les intentions de Properce et la composition du livre IV des “Élégies”’, Latomus 11.2–4: 183–97, 315–26, 437–50.Google Scholar

Grimal, P. (1989) ‘Jupiter, Anchise et Vulcain: Trois rélévations sur le destin de Rome’, in Diggle, Hall & Jocelyn 1989: 1–13.Google Scholar

Gros, P. (1993) ‘Apollo Palatinus’, LTUR 1.54–7.Google Scholar

Gros, P. (1999) ‘Porticus Pompei’, LTUR 4: 148–9.Google Scholar

Gros, P. (2003) ‘Le bois sacré du Palatin: Une composante oubliée du sanctuaire augustéen d’Apollon’, RA 35.1: 51–66.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (2011) Rethinking the Other in Antiquity. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Guarducci, M. (1977) ‘Epigrammi greci in una casa romana di Assisi’, in Bigaroni & Santucci 1977: 123–9.Google Scholar

Gumpert, M. (2001) Grafting Helen: The Abduction of the Classical Past. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Günther, H.-C. (ed.) (1997) Quaestiones Propertianae. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Günther, H.-C. (1998) ‘Word play in Propertius’, Eikasmos 9: 243–57.Google Scholar

Günther, H.-C. (ed.) (2006a) Brill’s Companion to Propertius. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Günther, H.-C. (2006b) ‘The fourth book’, in Günther 2006a: 353–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Günther, H.-C. & Fedeli, P. (eds.) (2015) Virgilian Studies: A Miscellany Dedicated to the Memory of Mario Geymonat. Nordhausen.Google Scholar

Gurval, R. A. (1995) Actium and Augustus: The Politics and Emotions of War. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guthrie, W. K. C. (1962) A History of Greek Philosophy, Vol. I: The Earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gutzwiller, K. J. (1981) Studies in the Hellenistic Epyllion. Königstein.Google Scholar

Gutzwiller, K. J. (1985) ‘The lover and the lena: Propertius 4.5’, Ramus 14.2: 105–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutzwiller, K. J. (1991) Theocritus’ Pastoral Analogies: The Formation of a Genre. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Gutzwiller, K. J. (1992) ‘Callimachus’ Lock of Berenice: Fantasy, romance, and propaganda’, AJPh 113.3: 359–85.Google Scholar

Gutzwiller, K. J. (1996) ‘The evidence for Theocritean poetry‐books’, in Harder, Regtuit & Wakker 1996: 119–48.Google Scholar

Gutzwiller, K. J. (ed.) (2005) The New Posidipppus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gutzwiller, K. J. (2007) A Guide to Hellenistic Literature. Malden, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutzwiller, K. J. (2012) ‘The Hecale and Hellenistic conceptions of short hexameter narratives’, in Bär, S. & Baumbach, M. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Epyllion and its Reception. Leiden: 221–44.Google Scholar