Abramovitz, Moses. 1956. “Resource and Output Trends in the United States Since 1870.” American Economic Review 46, no. 2 (May): 5–23.Google Scholar

Abramovitz, Moses. 1962. “Economic Growth in the United States.” The American Economic Review 52, no. 4 (Sep.): 762–82.Google Scholar

Alford, L. P. 1929. “Technical Change in Manufacturing.” In Recent Economic Changes, edited by the Committee on Recent Economic Changes of the President’s Conference on Unemployment, Vol. 1, 96–166. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Allen, R. G. D. 1938. Mathematical Analysis for Economists. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth J. 1985. Collected Papers of Kenneth J. Arrow: Production and Capital, Vol. 5. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth J., Chenery, H. B., Minhas, B. S., and Solow, R. M.. 1961. “Capital-Labor Substitution and Economic Efficiency.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 43, no. 3 (Aug.): 225–50.Google Scholar

Aukrust, Odd. 1959. “Investment and Economic Growth.” Productivity Measurement Review 16 (Feb.): 35–54.Google Scholar

Aukrust, Odd and Bjerke, Juule. 1959. “Real Capital and Economic Growth in Norway, 1900–56.” Review of Income and Wealth 8, no. 1 (Mar.): 80–118.Google Scholar

Ayres, Leonard. 1927. “The Dilemma of the New Statistics.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 22, no. 157 (Mar.): 1–8.Google Scholar

Backhouse, Roger. 1998. “The Transformation of U.S. Economics, 1920–1960, Viewed through a Survey of Journal Articles.” History of Political Economy 30 (annual suppl.): 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banzhaf, H. Spencer. 2006. “The Other Economics Department: Demand and Value Theory in Early Agricultural Economics.” History of Political Economy 38 (annual suppl.): 9–30.Google Scholar

Barber, William J. 1985. From New Era to New Deal: Herbert Hoover, the Economists and American Economic Policy, 1921–1933. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, William J. 1994. “The Divergent Fate of Two Strands of Institutionalist Doctrine during the New Deal Years.” History of Political Economy 26, no. 2 (Summer): 569–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barro, Robert J. 1999. “Notes on Growth Accounting.” Journal of Economic Growth 4, no. 2 (June): 119–37.Google Scholar

Barton, Glen T. and Cooper, Martin R.. 1948. “Relation of Agricultural Production to Inputs.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 30, no. 2 (May): 117–26.Google Scholar

Bell, Spurgeon. 1939. Productivity, Wages, and National Income. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.Google Scholar

Benedict, M. R. 1932a. “The Opportunity Cost Basis of the Substitution Method in Farm Management.” Journal of Farm Economics 14, no. 3 (July): 384–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benedict, M. R. 1932b. “The Opportunity Cost Basis of the Substitution Method in Farm Management.” Journal of Farm Economics 14, no. 4 (Oct.): 541–57.Google Scholar

Beneke, Raymond R. 1994. “On Becoming Distinguished.” In Earl O Heady: His Impact on Agricultural Economics, edited by Langley, James, Vocke, Gary, and Whiting, Larry, 3–23. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar

Berglas, Eitan. 1965. “Investment and Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 73, no. 2 (Apr.): 173–80.Google Scholar

Berman, Edward. 1934. “Review of The Theory of Wages.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 174 (July): 182–3.Google Scholar

Biddle, Jeff E. 1996. “H. Gregg Lewis.” In American Economists of the Late 20th Century, edited by Samuels, Warren, 174–93. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Biddle, Jeff E. 1999. “Statistical Economics, 1900–1950.” History of Political Economy 31 (Winter): 607–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biddle, Jeff E. 2011. “The Introduction of the Cobb–Douglas Regression and Its Adoption by Agricultural Economists.” History of Political Economy 38 (annual suppl.): 235–57.Google Scholar

Biddle, Jeff E. 2012. “Retrospectives: The Introduction of the Cobb–Douglas Regression.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26, no. 2 (Spring): 223–36.Google Scholar

Biddle, Jeff E. 2017. “Statistical Inference in Economics, 1920–1965: Changes in Meaning and Practice.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 39, no. 2 (June): 149–73.Google Scholar

Bigge, George E. 1934. “Review of The Theory of Wages.” The American Economic Review 24, no. 4 (Dec.): 688–93.Google Scholar

Bioanovsky, M. and Hoover, K. D.. 2009. Robert Solow and the Development of Growth Economics. History of Political Economy 41 (suppl.). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Black, John (ed.). 1932. Research in Farm Management: Scope and Method. New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar

Black, R. D. C., Coats, Alfred W., and Goodwin, Craufurd D. W. (eds.). 1973. The Marginal Revolution in Economics: Interpretation and Evaluation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Blaug, Mark (ed.) (1999). Who’s Who in Economics (3rd ed.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Bloom, David E., Canning, David, and Sevilla, Jaypee. 2003. “The Effect of Health on Economic Growth: A Production Function Approach.” World Development 32, no. 1: 1–13.Google Scholar

Bloom, Gordon. 1946. “A Note on Hicks’s Theory of Invention.” The American Economic Review 36, no. 1 (Mar.): 83–96.Google Scholar

Boulding, Kenneth. 1961. “Some Difficulties in the Concept of Economic Input.” In Conference on Research in Income and Wealth, Output, Input, and Productivity Measurement, 331–46. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Boumans, Marcel. 2009. “Dynamizing Stability.” In Robert Solow and the Development of Growth Economics, edited by Bioanovsky, M. and Hoover, K. D., 127–48. History of Political Economy 41 (suppl.). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Bowles, Samuel. 1970. “Towards in Education Production Function.” In Education, Income, and Human Capital, edited by Hansen, W. Lee, 11–70. New York: NBER.Google Scholar

Bowley, Arthur L. 1901. Elements of Statistics. London: P. S. King & Sons.Google Scholar

Brewer, Anthony. 1991. “Economic Growth and Technical Change: John Rae’s Critique of Adam Smith.” History of Political Economy 23 (Spring): 1–11.Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, Martin. 1939. “The Cobb–Douglas Function and Trade-Union Policy.” The American Economic Review 29, no. 4 (Dec.): 793–6.Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, Martin. 1944. “Production Functions: Cobb–Douglas, Interfirm, Intrafirm.” Econometrica 12, no. 1 (Jan.): 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, Martin and Douglas, Paul H.. 1939. “Cross-Section Studies in the Cobb–Douglas Function.” The Journal of Political Economy 47, no. 6 (Dec.): 761–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Murray. 1966. On the Theory and Measurement of Technological Change. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, Murray and De Cani, John S.. 1961. “Technological Change in the United States, 1950–1960.” In American Statistical Association 1961: Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section, 74–81. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association.Google Scholar

Burnett, Paul. 2011. “Academic Freedom or Political Maneuvers: Theodore W. Schultz and the Oleomargarine Controversy Revisited.” Agricultural History 85, no. 3 (Summer): 373–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burns, Arthur F. and Mitchell, W. C.. 1946. Measuring Business Cycles. New York: NBER.Google Scholar

Cargill, T. F. 1974. “Early Applications of Spectral Methods to Economic Time Series.” History of Political Economy 6, no. 1: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carson, Carol S. 1975. “The History of the United States National Income and Product Accounts: The Development of an Analytical Tool.” Review of Income and Wealth 21, no. 2 (June): 153–81.Google Scholar

Chenery, Hollis B. 1960a. “Interindustry Research in Economic Development.” The American Economic Review, 50, no. 2 (May): 649–53.Google Scholar

Chenery, Hollis B. 1960b. “Patterns of Industrial Growth.” The American Economic Review 50, no. 4 (Sep.): 624–54.Google Scholar

Chenery, Hollis B. and Watanabe, Tsunehiko. 1958. “International Comparisons of the Structure of Production.” Econometrica 26, no. 4 (Oct.): 487–521.Google Scholar

Christensen, L., Jorgenson, D., and Lau, L.. 1973. “Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 55, no. 1 (Aug.): 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, J. B. 1908 [1899]. The Distribution of Wealth: A Theory of Wages, Interest and Profits. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Clark, J. M. 1928. “Inductive Evidence on Marginal Productivity.” The American Economic Review 18, no. 3 (Sep.): 450–67.Google Scholar

Cobb, Charles W. 1913. The Asymptotic Development for a Certain Integral Function of Zero Order. Norwood, MA: The Norwood Press. https://archive.org/stream/asymptoticdevelo00cobbrich#page/n1/mode/2upGoogle Scholar

Cobb, Charles W. 1930. “Production in Massachusetts Manufacturing, 1890–1928.” The Journal of Political Economy 38, no. 6 (Dec.): 705–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cobb, Charles W. and Douglas, Paul H.. 1928. “A Theory of Production.” The American Economic Review 18, no. 1 (Mar.): 139–65.Google Scholar

Collier, Irwin. 2016. “Amherst. Charles W. Cobb and Paul H. Douglas, 1926.” www.irwincollier.com/amherst-charles-w-cobb-and-paul-h-douglas-1926/Google Scholar

Copeland, Morris A. 1929. “The National Income and Its Distribution.” In Recent Economic Changes, edited by the Committee on Recent Economic Changes of the President’s Conference on Unemployment, Vol. 1, 761–844. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Copeland, Morris A. 1937. “Concepts of National Income.” In Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 1, edited by the Conference on Research in National Income and Wealth, 3–63. New York: NBER.Google Scholar

Copeland, Morris A. and Martin, E. M.. 1938. “The Correction of Wealth and Income Estimates for Price Changes.” In Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 2, edited by the Conference on Research in National Income and Wealth, 85–135. New York: NBER.Google Scholar

Daly, Patricia and Douglas, Paul H.. 1943. “The Production Function for Canadian Manufacturers.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 38, no. 222 (June): 178–86.Google Scholar

Daly, Patricia, Olson, Ernest, and Douglas, Paul H.. 1943. “The Production Function for Manufacturing in the United States, 1904.” The Journal of Political Economy 51, no. 1 (Feb.): 61–5.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine J. and Galison, Peter. 1992. “The Image of Objectivity.” Special Issue, “Seeing Science,” Representations 40: 81–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Day, Edmund E. and Persons, W. M.. (1920a). “An Index of the Physical Volume of Production: I. Agriculture 1879–1919.” Review of Economic Statistics 2, no. 9 (Sep.): 246–59.Google Scholar

Day, Edmund E. and Persons, W. M.. (1920b). “An Index of the Physical Volume of Production: II. Mining 1979–1919.” Review of Economic Statistics 2, no. 10 (Oct.): 287–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Day, Edmund E. and Persons, W. M.. (1920c). “An Index of the Physical Volume of Production: III. Manufacture 1899–1919.” Review of Economic Statistics 2, no. 11 (Nov.): 309–37.Google Scholar

Day, Edmund E. and Persons, W. M.. (1920d). “An Index of the Physical Volume of Production: III. Manufacture (concluded).” Review of Economic Statistics 2, no. 12 (Dec.): 361–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Day, Edmund E. and Persons, W. M.. (1921). “An Index of the Physical Volume of Production: IV. Agriculture, Mining, and Manufacturing Combined, 1899–1919.” Review of Economic Statistics 3, no. 1 (Jan.): 19–22.Google Scholar

Debertin, David. 1986. Agricultural Production Economics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Denison, Edward F. 1962. The Sources of Economic Growth and the Alternatives Before Us. Committee for Economic Development Supplementary Paper # 13. New York: Committee for Economic Development.Google Scholar

Denison, Edward F. 1964. “The Unimportance of the Embodied Question.” The American Economic Review 54, no. 2, Part 1 (Mar.): 90–4.Google Scholar

Dennison, Henry S. 1930. “Some Economic and Social Accompaniments of the Mechanization of Industry.” American Economic Review 20, no. 1, Supplement (Mar.): 133–55.Google Scholar

Dickinson, Z. C. 1934. “Recent Literature on Wage Theory.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 49, no. 1 (Nov.): 138–46.Google Scholar

Dillon, John L. 1994. “Agricultural Production Function Analysis.” In Earl O Heady: His Impact on Agricultural Economics, edited by Langley, James, Vocke, Gary, and Whiting, Larry, 52–61. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar

Domar, Evsey. 1961. “On the Measurement of Technological Change.” The Economic Journal 71, no. 284 (Dec.): 709–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, Paul H. 1918. “The Problem of Labor Turnover.” The American Economic Review 8, no. 2 (June): 306–16.Google Scholar

Douglas, Paul H. 1919. “Is the New Immigration More Unskilled than the Old?” Publications of the American Statistical Association 16, no. 126 (June): 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, Paul H. 1926. “The Movement of Real Wages and Its Economic Significance.” The American Economic Review 16, no. 1, Supplement (Mar.): 17–53.Google Scholar

Douglas, Paul H. 1927. “The Modern Technique of Mass Production and Its Relation to Wages.” Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science in the City of New York 12, no. 3, Stabilizing Business (July): 17–42.Google Scholar

Douglas, Paul H. 1930. Real Wages in the United States, 1890–1926. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Douglas, Paul H. 1934. The Theory of Wages. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Douglas, Paul H. 1939. “Henry Schultz as Colleague.” Econometrica 7, no. 2: 104–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, Paul H. 1948. “Are There Laws of Production?” The American Economic Review 38, no. 1 (Mar.): i–ii+1–41.Google Scholar

Douglas, Paul H. 1967. “Comments on the Cobb–Douglas Production Function.” In The Theory and Empirical Analysis of Production, edited by Brown, Murray, 15–22. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Douglas, Paul H. 1971. In the Fullness of Time: The Memoirs of Paul H. Douglas. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Douglas, Paul H. 1976. “The Cobb–Douglas Production Function Once Again: Its History, Its Testing, and Some New Empirical Values.” The Journal of Political Economy 84, no. 5 (Oct.): 903–15.Google Scholar

Douglas, Paul H. and Lamberson, Francis. 1921. “The Movement of Real Wages, 1890–1918.” The American Economic Review 11, no. 3 (Sep.): 409–26.Google Scholar

Dupont-Kieffer, Arienne and Pirotte, Alain. 2011. “The Early Years of Panel Data Econometrics.” History of Political Economy 43 (suppl.): 258–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durand, David. 1937. “Some Thoughts on Marginal Productivity, with Special Reference to Professor Douglas’ Analysis.” The Journal of Political Economy 45, no. 6 (Dec.): 740–58.Google Scholar

Easterly, William. 2001. The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists’ Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ezekiel, Mordecai. 1926. “Studies of the Effectiveness of Individual Farm Enterprises.” Journal of Farm Economics 8, no. 1 (Jan.): 86–101.Google Scholar

Fabricant, Solomon. 1938. Capital Consumption and Adjustment. New York: NBER.Google Scholar

Fabricant, Solomon. 1942. Employment in Manufacturing, 1899–1939: An Analysis of Its Relation to the Volume of Production. New York: NBER.Google Scholar

Fabricant, Solomon. 1954. Economic Progress and Economic Change. 34th annual report. New York: NBER. www.nber.org/chapters/c12288.pdfGoogle Scholar

Fabricant, Solomon. 1959. The Study of Economic Growth. New York: NBER. http://papers.nber.org/books/fabr59–2Google Scholar

Ferguson, C. E. 1963. “Cross-Section Production Functions and the Elasticity of Substitution in American Manufacturing Industry.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 45, no. 3 (Aug.): 305–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, Karl A. 1986. “Agricultural Economists as World Leaders in Applied Econometrics, 1917–33.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68, no. 2 (May): 381–6.Google Scholar

Fox, Karl A. 1989. “Agricultural Economists in the Econometric Revolution: Institutional Background, Literature and Leading Figures.” Oxford Economic Papers New Series, 41, no. 1 History and Methodology of Econometrics (Jan.): 53–70.Google Scholar

Frankel, Marvin. 1957. “British and American Manufacturing Productivity.” University of Illinois Bulletin. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Frisch, Ragnar. 1934. Statistical Confluence Analysis by Means of Complete Regression Systems. Oslo: Universitetets Økonomiske Instituut.Google Scholar

Fuchs, Victor R. 1963. “Capital Labor Substitution: A Note.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 45, no. 4 (Nov.): 436–8.Google Scholar

Fuller, Wayne A. 1962. “Estimating the Reliability of Quantities Derived from Empirical Production Functions.” Journal of Farm Economics 44, no. 1 (Feb.): 82–99.Google Scholar

Gay, Edwin F. and Mitchell, W. C.. 1932. “Report of the President and Report of the Directors of Research for the Year 1931.” New York: NBER. www.nber.org/chapters/c4299.pdfGoogle Scholar

Gay, Edwin F. and Mitchell, W. C.. 1933. “Message of the President, Report of the Directors of Research for the Year 1932.” New York: NBER. www.nber.org/chapters/c4151.pdfGoogle Scholar

George, Henry. 1981 [1979]. Progress and Poverty. New York: Schalkenbach Foundation.Google Scholar

Gilfillan, S. C. 1932. “Inventions and Discoveries.” American Journal of Sociology 37, no. 6 (May): 868–75.Google Scholar

Girshick, M. A. and Haavelmo, Trygve. 1947. “Statistical Analysis of the Demand for Food: Examples of Simultaneous Estimation of Structural Equations.” Econometrica 15, no. 2 (Apr.): 79–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldsmith, Raymond. 1950. “Measuring National Wealth in a System of Social Accounting.” Studies in Income and Wealth 12: 21–80.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Raymond. 1951. “A Perpetual Inventory of National Wealth.” Studies in Income and Wealth 14: 5–74.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Raymond. 1952. “The Growth of Reproducible Wealth of the United States of America from 1805 to 1950.” In Income and Wealth in the United States, Trends and Structure, Income and Wealth Series II, edited by Kuznets, Simon. Cambridge, MA and Baltimore: International Association for Research in Income and Wealth.Google Scholar

Gordon, R. A. 1956. “Population Growth, Housing, and the Capital Coefficient.” The American Economic Review 46, no. 3 (June): 307–22.Google Scholar

Gordon, Robert J. 1990. The Measurement of Durable Goods Prices. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenwood, Jeremy, Hercowitz, Zvi, and Krusell, Per. 1997. “Long-Run Implications of Investment-Specific Technological Change.” The American Economic Review 87, no. 3 (Sep.): 342–62.Google Scholar

Griliches, Zvi. 1957. “Specification Bias in Production Function Estimation.” Journal of Farm Economics 39, no. 1 (Jan.): 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griliches, Zvi. 1962. “Review of Agricultural Production Functions by Earl O. Heady, John L. Dillon.” The American Economic Review 52, no. 1: 280–3.Google Scholar

Griliches, Zvi. 1963a. “Estimates of the Aggregate Agricultural Production Function from Cross-Sectional Data.” Journal of Farm Economics 45, no. 2 (May): 419–28.Google Scholar

Griliches, Zvi. 1963b. “The Sources of Measured Productivity Growth: United States Agriculture, 1940–60.” The Journal of Political Economy 71, no. 4 (Aug.): 331–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griliches, Zvi. 1964. “Research Expenditures, Education, and the Aggregate Agricultural Production Function.” The American Economic Review 54, no. 6 (Dec.): 961–74.Google Scholar

Griliches, Zvi. 1967. “Production Functions in Manufacturing: Some Preliminary Results.” In The Theory and Empirical Analysis of Production, edited by Brown, Murray, 275–340. New York: NBER.Google Scholar

Griliches, Zvi. 1968. “Production Functions in Manufacturing: Some Additional Results.” Southern Economic Journal 35, no. 2: 151–6.Google Scholar

Griliches, Zvi. 1979. “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth.” The Bell Journal of Economics 10, no. 1 (Spring): 92–116.Google Scholar

Griliches, Zvi. 1986. “Productivity, R and D, and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970s.” The American Economic Review 76, no. 1 (Mar.): 141–54.Google Scholar

Griliches, Zvi. 1996. “The Discovery of the Residual: A Historical Note.” Journal of Economic Literature 34, no. 3 (Sep.): 1324–30.Google Scholar

Griliches, Zvi and Jorgenson, Dale W.. 1966. “Sources of Measured Productivity Change: Capital Input.” The American Economic Review 56, no. 1/2 (Mar.): 50–61.Google Scholar

Griliches, Zvi and Mairesse, Jacques. 1999. “Production Functions: The Search for Identification.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 5067, New York: NBER www.nber.org/papers/w5067.pdfGoogle Scholar

Griliches, Zvi and Ringstad, Vidar. 1971. Economies of Scale and the Form of the Production Function: An Econometric Study of Norwegian Manufacturing Establishment Data. Contributions to Economic Analysis, Vol. 72. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Grose, Lawrence, Rottenberg, Irving, and Wasson, Robert. 1966. “New Estimates of Fixed Business Capital in the United States, 1925–65.” Survey of Current Business 46 (Dec.): 46–52.Google Scholar

Gunn, Grace T. and Douglas, Paul H.. 1940. “Further Measurements of Marginal Productivity.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 54, no. 3 (May): 399–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunn, Grace T. and Douglas, Paul H.. 1941a. “The Production Function for American Manufacturing in 1919.” The American Economic Review 31, no. 1 (Mar.): 67–80.Google Scholar

Gunn, Grace T. and Douglas, Paul H.. 1941b. “A Reply to Dr. Mendershausen’s Criticism.” The American Economic Review 31, no. 3 (Sep.): 564–7.Google Scholar

Gunn, Grace T. and Douglas, Paul H.. 1941c. “The Production Function for Australian Manufacturing.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 56, no. 1, pt. 1 (Nov.): 108–29.Google Scholar

Gunn, Grace T. and Douglas, Paul H.. 1942. “The Production Function for American Manufacturing for 1914.” The Journal of Political Economy 50, no. 4 (Aug.): 595–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haavelmo, Trygve. 1944. “The Probability Approach in Econometrics.” Econometrica 12, Supplement (July): iii-115.Google Scholar

Haavelmo, Trygve. 1947. “Quantitative Research in Agricultural Economics: The Interdependence between Agriculture and the National Economy.” Journal of Farm Economics 29, no. 4: 910–24.Google Scholar

Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Hall, R. E. 1968. “Technical Change and Capital from the Point of View of the Dual.” The Review of Economic Studies 35, no. 1 (Jan.): 35–46.Google Scholar

Hamermesh, Daniel. 2018. “Citations in Economics: Measurement, Uses and Impacts.” Journal of Economic Literature 56, no. 1 (Mar.): 115–56.Google Scholar

Handsaker, Marjorie L. and Douglas, Paul H.. 1937. “The Theory of Marginal Productivity Tested by Data for Manufacturing in Victoria, I.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 52, no. 1 (Nov.): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Handsaker, Marjorie L. and Douglas, Paul H.. 1938. “The Theory of Marginal Productivity Tested by Data for Manufacturing in Victoria, II.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 52, no. 2 (Feb.): 215–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harries, H. 1947. “The Development and Use of Production Functions for Firms in Agriculture.” Scientific Agriculture 27, no. 10: 487–93.Google Scholar

Harris, D. N. 2010. “Education Production Function: Concepts.” In International Encyclopedia of Education, 3rd ed., edited by Peterson, Penelope, Baker, Eva, and McGaw, Barry. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Heady, Earl O. 1946. “Production Functions from a Random Sample of Farms.” Journal of Farm Economics 28, no. 4 (Nov.): 989–1004.Google Scholar

Heady, Earl O. 1947. “Economics of Farm Leasing Systems.” Journal of Farm Economics 29, no. 3 (Aug.): 659–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heady, Earl O. 1948. “Elementary Models in Farm Production Economics Research.” Journal of Farm Economics 30, no. 2 (May): 201–25.Google Scholar

Heady, Earl O. 1949. “Implications of Particular Economics in Agricultural Economics Methodology.” Journal of Farm Economics 31, no. 4, Part 2: Proceedings Number (Nov.): 837–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heady, Earl O. 1951. “A Production Function and Marginal Rates of Substitution in the Utilization of Feed Resources by Dairy Cows.” Journal of Farm Economics 33, no. 4, pt. 1 (Nov.): 485–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heady, Earl O. 1952. “Use and Estimation of Input-Output Relationships or Productivity Coefficients.” Journal of Farm Economics 34, no. 5: 775–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heady, Earl O. 1955. “Marginal Resource Productivity and Imputation of Shares for a Sample of Rented Farms.” Journal of Political Economy 63 (Dec.): 500–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heady, Earl O. 1957a. “An Econometric Investigation of the Technology of Agricultural Production Functions.” Econometrica 25, no. 2 (Apr.): 249–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heady, Earl O. 1957b. “Organization Activities and Criteria in Obtaining and Fitting Technical Production Functions.” Journal of Farm Economics 39, no. 2 (May): 360–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heady, Earl O. and Dillon, John L.. 1961. Agricultural Production Functions. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar

Heady, Earl O. and Shaw, Russell. 1954. “Resource Returns and Productivity Coefficients in Selected Farming Areas.” Journal of Farm Economics 36, no. 2: 243–57.Google Scholar

Heady, Earl O. and du Toit, Schalk. 1954. “Marginal Resource Productivity for Agriculture in Selected Areas of South Africa and the United States.” Journal of Political Economy 62, no. 6 (Dec.): 494–505.Google Scholar

Heady, Earl O., Woodworth, Roger C., Catron, Damon, and Ashton, Gordon C.. 1953. “An Experiment to Derive Productivity and Substitution Coefficients in Pork Output.” Journal of Farm Economics 35, no. 3: 341–54.Google Scholar

Heath, J. B. 1957. “British-Canadian Industrial Productivity.” The Economic Journal 67, no. 268 (Dec.): 665–91.Google Scholar

Hendry, David F. and Morgan, Mary S.. 1989. “A Re-analysis of Confluence Analysis.” Oxford Economic Papers New Series 41, no. 1: 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hicks, John R. 1932. The Theory of Wages. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hicks, John R. 1939. Value and Capital. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hoch, Irving. 1955. “Estimation of Production Function Parameters and Testing for Efficiency.” Econometrica 23, no. 1 (Jan.): 325–6.Google Scholar

Hoch, Irving. 1958. “Simultaneous Equation Bias in the Context of the Cobb–Douglas Production Function.” Econometrica 26, no. 4 (Oct.): 566–78.Google Scholar

Hoch, Irving. 1962. “Estimation of Production Function Parameters Combining Time-Series and Cross-Section Data.” Econometrica 30, no. 1 (Jan.): 34–53.Google Scholar

Hogan, Warren P. 1958. “Technical Progress and Production Functions.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 40, no. 4 (Nov.): 407–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopkins, J. A. Jr. 1930. “Interpretation of Farm Efficiency Factors.” Journal of Farm Economics 12, no. 3 (July): 384–402.Google Scholar

Hulten, Charles R. 1992. “Growth Accounting When Technical Change Is Embodied in Capital.” The American Economic Review 82, no. 4 (Sep.): 964–80.Google Scholar

Intriligator, Michael D. 1965. “Embodied Technical Change and Productivity in the United States 1929–1958.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 47, no. 1 (Feb.): 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, Einar. 1940. “Determining Input-Output Relationships in Milk Production.” Journal of Farm Economics 22, no. 1 (Feb.): 249–58.Google Scholar

Jerome, Harry.1934. Mechanization in Industry. New York: NBER.Google Scholar

Johnson, Glenn L. 1955. “Results from Production Economic Analysis.” Journal of Farm Economics 37, no. 2 (May): 206–22.Google Scholar

Jones, William O. 1952. “The New Agricultural Economics.” Journal of Farm Economics 34, no. 4 (Nov.): 441–50.Google Scholar

Jorgenson, Dale W. 1966. “The Embodiment Hypothesis.” Journal of Political Economy 74, no. 1 (Feb.): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jorgenson, Dale W. 1988. “Productivity and Postwar U.S. Economic Growth.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 2, no. 4 (Autumn): 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaiser, David. 2005. Drawing Theories Apart: The Dispersion of Feynman Diagrams in Postwar Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kanel, Don. 1957. “Discussion: Relative Roles of Survey and Experiment in Farm Management Research.” Journal of Farm Economics 39, no. 5 (Dec.): 1451–4.Google Scholar

Kendrick, John W. 1956. “Productivity Trends: Capital and Labor.” Occasional Paper 53. New York: NBER.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendrick, John W. 1961a. “Introduction: Productivity and National Income Accounting.” In Output, Input, and Productivity Measurement, edited by the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth, 1–20. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kendrick, John W. 1961b. Productivity Trends in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kjaer, Swen. 1929. The Productivity of Labor in Newspaper Printing. Washington, DC: USGPO.Google Scholar

Klein, Lawrence R. 1946. “Remarks on the Theory of Aggregation.” Econometrica 14, no. 4 (Oct.): 303–12.Google Scholar

Klein, Lawrence R. 1947. “The Use of Econometric Models as a Guide to Economic Policy.” Econometrica 15, no. 2 (Apr.): 111–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Lawrence R. 1953. A Textbook of Econometrics. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson & Co.Google Scholar

Knight, Frank. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar

Knowles, James W. 1960. “The Potential Economic Growth in the United States.” Study paper no. 20, prepared for the Joint Economic Committee in connection with the study Employment, Growth, and Price Levels (86th Congress, 2nd session). Washington, DC: USGPO.Google Scholar

Konijn, H. S. 1959. “Estimation of an Average Production Function from Surveys.” Economic Record 35 (Apr.): 118–25.Google Scholar

Koopmans, Tjalling C. 1937. Linear Regression Analysis of Economic Time Series. Haarlem: DeErven F. Bohn.Google Scholar

Koopmans, Tjalling C. 1945. “Statistical Estimation of Simultaneous Economic Relations.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 40, no. 232, Part 1 (Dec.): 448–66.Google Scholar

Koopmans, Tjalling C. 1947. “Measurement without Theory.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 29, no. 3 (Aug.): 161–72.Google Scholar

Krueger, Alan B. and Taylor, Timothy. 2000. “An Interview with Zvi Griliches.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 14, no. 2 (Spring): 171–89.Google Scholar

Kuznets, Simon. 1934. “Gross Capital Formation, 1919–1933.” National Bureau of Economic Research Bulletin 52. New York: NBER.Google Scholar

Kuznets, Simon. 1938a. Commodity Flow and Capital Formation. New York: NBER.Google Scholar

Kuznets, Simon. 1938b. “On the Measurement of National Wealth.” In Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 2, 3–61. New York: NBER.Google Scholar

Kuznets, Simon. 1946. National Income: A Summary of Findings. New York: NBER.Google Scholar

Kuznets, Simon. 1947. “Measurement of Economic Growth.” The Journal of Economic History 7, Supplement: Economic Growth: A Symposium: 10–34.Google Scholar

Kuznets, Simon. 1949a. “Suggestion for an Inquiry into the Economic Growth of Nations.” In Problems in the Study of Economic Growth, edited by Universities-National Bureau Committee on Economic Research, 23–46. New York: NBER. www.nber.org/chapters/c9509.pdfGoogle Scholar

Kuznets, Simon. 1949b. “Notes on the Quantitative Approach to Economic Growth.” In Problems in the Study of Economic Growth, edited by Universities-National Bureau Committee on Economic Research, 117–74. New York: NBER. www.nber.org/chapters/c9509.pdfGoogle Scholar

Kuznets, Simon. 1952. “Proportion of Capital Formation to National Product.” The American Economic Review 42, no. 2 (May): 507–26.Google Scholar

Kuznets, Simon, assisted by Epstein, Lillian and Jenks, Elizabeth. 1946. National Product since 1869. New York: NBER.Google Scholar

Lange, Oscar. 1939. “Is the American Economy Contracting?” The American Economic Review 29, no. 3 (Sep.): 503–13.Google Scholar

James, Langley, Vocke, Gary, and Whiting, Larry, editors. 1994. Earl O Heady: His Impact on Agricultural Economics. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar

Leonard, Thomas. 2016. Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Leontief, Wassily. 1934. “Interest on Capital and Distribution: A Problem in the Theory of Marginal Productivity.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 49, no. 1 (Nov.): 147–61.Google Scholar

Leontief, Wassily. 1951 [1941]. The Structure of American Economy, 1919–1939, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lescohier, Don D. 1935. “The Theory of Wages.” Political Science Quarterly 50, no. 2 (Jun.): 272–7.Google Scholar

Levinsohn, J. and Petrin, A. 2003. “Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables.” Review of Economic Studies 70, no. 2 (Apr.): 317–41.Google Scholar

Lewis, W. Arthur. 1955. The Theory of Economic Growth. Homewood, IL: R. D. Irwin.Google Scholar

Lloyd, P. J. 2001. “The Origins of the von Thünen–Mill–Pareto–Wicksell–Cobb–Douglas Function.” History of Political Economy 33, no. 1 (Spring): 1–19.Google Scholar

Lomax, K. S. 1949. “An Agricultural Production Function for the United Kingdom, 1924–1947.” Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 17: 146–62.Google Scholar

Lomax, K. S. 1950. “Coal Production Functions for Great Britain.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) 113, no. 3: 346–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lovell, C. A. Knox. 1973. “CES and VES Production Functions in a Cross-Section Context.” Journal of Political Economy 81, no. 3 (May–June): 705–20.Google Scholar

MacFarlane, David. 1953. “Review of Economics of Agricultural Production and Resource Use by Earl O. Heady.” Journal of Farm Economics 35, no. 3 (Aug.): 444–5.Google Scholar

Marschak, Jacob. 1936. “An Empirical Analysis of the Laws of Distribution.” Economica New Series 3, no. 10 (May): 221–6.Google Scholar

Marschak, Jacob and Andrews, William H. Jr. 1944. “Random Simultaneous Equations and the Theory of Production.” Econometrica 12, no. 3/4 (Jul.–Oct.): 143–205.Google Scholar

Marshall, Alfred. 1948 [1920]. Principles of Economics, 8th ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. 1992 [1848]. The Communist Manifesto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Matthews, Ada M. 1925. “The Physical Volume of Production in the United States for 1924.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 7, no. 3 (July): 208–16.Google Scholar

McHugh, Richard and Lane, Julia. 1983. “The Embodiment Hypothesis: An Interregional Test.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 65, no. 2 (May): 323–7.Google Scholar

Mendershausen, Horst. 1938. “On the Significance of Professor Douglas’ Production Function.” Econometrica 6, no. 2 (Apr.): 143–53.Google Scholar

Mendershausen, Horst. 1941a. “On the Significance of Another Production Function: A Comment.” The American Economic Review 31, no. 3 (Sep.): 563–4.Google Scholar

Mendershausen, Horst. 1941b. “A Reply to Dr. Mendershausen’s Criticism: A Rejoinder.” The American Economic Review 31, no. 3 (Sep.): 567–9.Google Scholar

Menze, Robert E. 1942. “An Economic Analysis of Length of Feeding Period in the Production of Hogs.” Journal of Farm Economics 24, no. 2 (May): 518–23.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. 1935. “Fluctuations in the Rate of Industrial Invention.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 49, no. 3 (May): 454–74.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. 1987 [1848]. Principles of Political Economy. Fairfield, NJ: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar

Mills, Frederick C. 1924. Statistical Methods Applied to Business and Economics. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar

Mills, Frederick C. 1952. “Productivity and Economic Progress.” Occasional Paper No. 38. New York: NBER.Google Scholar

Minhas, Bagicha. 1963. An International Comparison of Factor Cost and Factor Use. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Mirowski, Philip. 1991. “The When, the How and the Why of Mathematical Expression in the History of Economics Analysis.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 5, no. 1 (Winter): 145–57.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Wesley. 1929. “A Review.” In Recent Economic Changes, edited by the Committee on Recent Economic Changes of the President’s Conference on Unemployment, Vol. 1, 845–914. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Wesley. 1936. Retrospect and Prospect 1920–1936. New York: NBER. www.nber.org/chapters/c12282.pdfGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, Wesley. 1939. The National Bureau Enters Its Twentieth Year. New York: NBER.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Wesley, King, Willford, Macauley, Frederick, and Knauth, Oswald. 1921. Income in the United States: Its Amount and Distribution 1909–1919, 2 Vols. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar

Morgan, Mary S. 1990. The History of Econometric Ideas. Cambridge, UK: The Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Morgan, Mary S. and Rutherford, Malcom. 1998. From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Mundlak, Yair. 1961. “Empirical Production Function Free of Management Bias.” Journal of Farm Economics 43, no. 1 (Feb.): 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, William G. 1994. “Intellectual Breakthrough.” In Earl O Heady: His Impact on Agricultural Economics, edited by Langley, James, Vocke, Gary, and Whiting, Larry, 24–8. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, Richard N. 1964. “Aggregate Production Functions and Medium-Range Growth Projections.” The American Economic Review 54, no. 5 (Sep.): 575–606.Google Scholar

Nerlove, Marc. 2001. “Zvi Griliches, 1930–1999: A Critical Appreciation.” The Economic Journal 111, no. 472: F422–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicholls, William H. 1948. Labor Productivity Functions in Meat Packing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Nittamo, Olivi. 1958. “The Development of Productivity in Finnish Industry.” Productivity Measurement Review 15 (Nov.): 30–41.Google Scholar

Olson, Ernest. 1948. “Factors Affecting International Differences in Production.” The American Economic Review 38, no. 2 (May): 502–22.Google Scholar

Page, Eric. 1994. “Obituary: Hollis B. Chenery Dies at 77; Economist for the World Bank.” New York Times. Sep. 5, 1994.Google Scholar

Parikh, Kirit, Srinivasan, T., and Tendulkar, S.. 2005. “To ‘Ustad’, with Love: A Tribute to Bagicha Singh Minhas.” Economic and Political Weekly 40, no. 44/45: 4670–3.Google Scholar

Phelps Brown, E. H. 1957. “The Meaning of the Fitted Cobb–Douglas Production Function.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 71: 546–60.Google Scholar

Phelps, Edmund S. 1962. “The New View of Investment: A Neoclassical Analysis.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 76, no. 4 (Nov.): 548–67.Google Scholar

Pigou, Arthur C. 1932 [1920]. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan and Co. www.econlib.org/library/NPDBooks/Pigou/pgEW57.htmlGoogle Scholar

Plaxico, James S. 1955. “Problems of Factor-Product Aggregation in Cobb–Douglas Value Productivity Analysis.” Journal of Farm Economics 37, no. 4 (Nov.): 664–75.Google Scholar

Porter, Theodore. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Reder, Melvin W. 1943. “An Alternative Interpretation of the Cobb–Douglas Function.” Econometrica 11, no. 3/4 (Jul.–Oct.): 259–64.Google Scholar

Reder, Melvin W. 1982. “Chicago Economics: Permanence and Change.” Journal of Economic Literature 20, no. 1 (Mar.): 1–38.Google Scholar

Redman, John C. 1954. “Problems and Possible Solutions in Determining Input-Output Relationships in Agricultural Enterprises.” Journal of Farm Economics 36, no. 5 (Dec.): 1024–33.Google Scholar

Robinson, Joan. 1933. The Economics of Imperfect Competition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Rowe, J. W. F. 1934. “Review of The Theory of Wages.” The Economic Journal 44, no. 176 (Dec.): 684–7.Google Scholar

Rutherford, Malcolm. 2005. “‘Who’s Afraid of Arthur Burns?’: The NBER and the Foundations.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 27, no. 2 (June): 109–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rutherford, Malcolm. 2011. The Institutionalist Movement in American Economics, 1918–1947: Science and Social Control. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Samuelson, Paul A. 1979. “Paul Douglas’s Measurement of Production Functions and Marginal Productivities.” The Journal of Political Economy 87, no. 5, Part 1 (Oct.): 923–39.Google Scholar

Schmookler, Jacob. 1951. Invention and Economic Development. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest/UMI (Publication No. 0007813).Google Scholar

Schmookler, Jacob. 1952. “The Changing Efficiency of the American Economy, 1869–1938.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 34, no. 3 (Aug.): 214–31.Google Scholar

Schultz, Henry. 1929. “Marginal Productivity and the General Pricing Process.” The Journal of Political Economy 37, no. 5 (Oct.): 505–51.Google Scholar

Schultz, Theodore W. 1956. “Reflections on Agricultural Production, Output and Supply.” Journal of Farm Economics 38, no. 3 (Aug.): 748–62.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shapin, Steven and Schaffer, Simon. 1985. Leviathan and the Air Pump. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Shaw, William H. 1941. Finished Commodities since 1879: Output and Its Composition. New York: NBER.Google Scholar

Siegel, Irving H. 1951. “Letter to the Editor.” The American Statistician 5, no. 5 (Dec.): 12–13.Google Scholar

Siegel, Irving H. 1961. “On the Design of Consistent Output and Input Indexes for Productivity Measurement.” In Conference on Research in Income and Wealth, Output, Input, and Productivity Measurement, 23–46. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Sol. 1947. “Discussion.” Scientific Agriculture 2, no. 10: 493–4.Google Scholar

Slichter, Sumner. 1928. “Economic and Social Aspects of Increased Productive Efficiency – Discussion.” The American Economic Review 18, no. 1, Supplement (Mar.): 166–70.Google Scholar

Smith, Victor E. 1945a. “Nonlinearity in the Relation between Input and Output: The Canadian Automobile Industry, 1918–1930.” Econometrica 13, no. 3 (Jul.): 260–72.Google Scholar

Smith, Victor E. 1945b. “The Statistical Production Function.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 59, no. 4 (Aug.): 543–62.Google Scholar

Solow, Robert M. 1956. “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 70, no. 1 (Feb.): 65–94.Google Scholar

Solow, Robert M. 1957. “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function.” Review of Economics and Statistics 39, no. 3 (Aug.): 312–20.Google Scholar

Solow, Robert M. 1958a. “A Skeptical Note on the Constancy of Relative Shares.” The American Economic Review 48, no. 4 (Sep.): 618–31.Google Scholar

Solow, Robert M. 1958b. “Technical Progress and Production Functions: Reply.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 40, no. 4 (Nov.): 411–13.Google Scholar

Solow, Robert M. 1960. “Investment and Technical Progress.” In Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, 1959, edited by Arrow, K. J., Karlin, S., and Suppes, P., 89–104. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Solow, Robert M. 1962. “Technical Progress, Capital Formation, and Economic Growth.” The American Economic Review 52, no. 2 (May): 76–86.Google Scholar

Solow, Robert M. 2001. “After Technical Progress and the Aggregate Production Function.” In New Developments in Productivity Analysis, edited by Hulten, Charles R., Dean, Edwin R., and Harper, Michael J., 173–8. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Stern, Boris. 1927. “Productivity of Labor in the Glass Industry.” U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Bulletin 441. Washington, DC: USGPO.Google Scholar

Stigler, George J. 1941. Production and Distribution Theories: The Formative Period. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Stigler, George J. 1947. Trends in Output and Employment. New York: NBER.Google Scholar

Stigler, George J. 1961. “Economic Problems in Measuring Changes in Productivity.” In Conference on Research in Income and Wealth, Output, Input, and Productivity Measurement, 47–78. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Stone, Richard. 1939. “Review of Commodity Flow and Capital Formation, by Simon Kuznets.” Economic Journal 49 (June): 308–9.Google Scholar

Syverson, Chad. 2001. “What Determines Productivity?” Journal of Economic Literature 49, no. 2 (June): 326–65.Google Scholar

Terborgh, George. 1939. “Estimated Expenditures for New Durable Goods.” Federal Reserve Bulletin 25 (Sep.): 731–6.Google Scholar

Thomas, Woodlief. 1927a. “The Growth of Production and the Rising Standard of Living.” Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science in the City of New York 12, no. 3, Stabilizing Business (July): 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, Woodlief. 1927b. “Construction of an Index Number of Production.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 22, no. 159 (Sep.): 315–30.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, J. 1942. “Professor Douglas’ Production Function.” Review of the International Statistical Institute 10, no. 1/2: 37–48.Google Scholar

Tintner, Gerhard. 1944a. “A Note on the Derivation of Production Functions from Farm Records.” Econometrica 12, no. 1 (Jan.): 26–34.Google Scholar

Tintner, Gerhard. 1944b. “An Application of the Variate Difference Method to Multiple Regression.” Econometrica 12, no. 2 (Apr.): 97–113.Google Scholar

Tintner, Gerhard. 1952. Econometrics. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Tintner, Gerhard and Brownlee, O. H.. 1944. “Production Functions Derived from Farm Records.” Journal of Farm Economics 26, no. 3 (Aug.): 566–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tukey, John W. 1962. “The Future of Data Analysis.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33, no. 1 (March): 1–67.Google Scholar

United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1927. “Comparisons of Employment and Productivity in Manufacturing Industries, 1919–1925.” Monthly Labor Review 24 (May): 16–18.Google Scholar

United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1928. “Productivity of Labor in Merchant Blast Furnaces.” Bureau of Labor Statistics Bulletin 474. Washington, DC: USGPO.Google Scholar

United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1931. “Technological Changes in the Cigar Industry and Their Effects on Labor.” Monthly Labor Review 33 (Dec.): 1275–81.Google Scholar

Valavanis-Vail, Stefan. 1955. “An Econometric Model of Growth: U. S. A. 1869–1953.” The American Economic Review 45, no. 2 (May): 208–21.Google Scholar

Viner, Jacob. 1952 [1931]. “Cost Curves and Supply Curves.” In Readings in Price Theory, edited by Boulding, K. and Stigler, George, 198–232. Chicago: Richard D. Irwin.Google Scholar

Vining, Rutledge and Koopmans, T.. 1949. “Koopmans on the Choice of Variables to Be Studied and the Methods of Measurement (with Response and Rejoinder).” The Review of Economics and Statistics 31, no. 2 (May): 77–94.Google Scholar

Waite, Warren. 1936. “Combination of Factors of Different Efficiency.” Journal of Farm Economics 18, no. 4 (Oct.): 743–5.Google Scholar

Wall, Burton. 1948. “A Cobb–Douglas Function for the United States Manufacturing and Mining, 1920–1940.” In “Report of the Chicago Meeting, December 27–30, 1947.” 211–13. Econometrica 16, no. 2 (Apr.): 199–215.Google Scholar

Walters, A. A. 1963a. “Production and Cost Functions: An Econometric Survey.” Econometrica 31, no. 1-2 (Jan.-Apr.): 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walters, A. A. 1963b. “A Note on Economies of Scale.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 45, no. 4 (Nov.): 425–7.Google Scholar

Warren, Stanley W. 1936. “Statistical Analysis in Farm Management Research.” Journal of Farm Economics 18, no. 1: 169–79.Google Scholar

Wasson, R. C., Musgrave, J. C., and Harkins, C.. 1970. “Alternative Estimates of Fixed Business Capital in the United States, 1925–1968.” Survey of Current Business 50 (Apr.): 18–36.Google Scholar

Wheeler, Richard G. 1950. “New England Dairy Farm Management Project as an Example of the Operating Unit Approach to Farm Management Analysis.” Journal of Farm Economics 32, no. 2 (May): 201–15.Google Scholar

Woirol, Gregory R. 2006. “New Data, New Issues. The Origins of the Technological Unemployment Debate.” History of Political Economy 38, no. 3 (Fall): 473–96.Google Scholar

Wooldridge, Jeff. 2009. “On Estimating Firm-Level Production Functions Using Proxy Variables to Control for Unobservables.” Economics Letters 104, no. 3 (Sep.) 112–14.Google Scholar

Working, E. J. 1927. “What Do Statistical ‘Demand Curves’ Show?” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 41, no. 2: 212–35.Google Scholar

Yarrow, Andrew L. 2010. Measuring America: How Economic Growth Came to Define American Greatness in the Late Twentieth Century. Amherst and Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Yotopoulos, Panos A. and Nugent, Jeffrey B.. 1976. Economics of Development – Empirical Investigations. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

You, Jong Keun. 1968. “Embodied and Disembodied Technical Progress in the United States, 1929–1968.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 58, no. 1 (Feb.): 123–7.Google Scholar