Aaker, David A. and Day, George S. 1971. Consumerism. Search for the Consumer Interest (New York, 1971).Google Scholar

Abbott, Frederick M. 2005. ‘Toward a New Era of Objective Assessment in the Field of TRIPS And Variable Geometry for the Preservation of Multilateralism’, Journal of International Economic Law 8: 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Addo, Kofi 2002. ‘The Correlation Between Labour Standards and International Trade’, Journal of World Trade 36(2): 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahmad, N. and Wyckoff, A. 2003. ‘Carbon Dioxide Emissions Embodied in International Trade of Goods’, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2003/15, OECD Publishing.

Anderson, Kym 1998. ‘Environmental and Labor Standards: What Role for the WTO?’, in Krueger (ed.), The WTO as an International Organization.

Appleton, Arthur E. 1999. ‘Shrimp/Turtle: Untangling the Nets’, Journal of International Economic Law 2(3): 477–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appleton, Arthur E. 2002. ‘Environmental Labelling Schemes Revisited: WTO Law and Developing Country Implications’, in Sampson and Chambers (eds.), Trade, Environment, and the Millennium, pp. 235–66.

Bacchus, James 2005. ‘Appellators: The Quest for the Meaning of And/Or’, essay based on remarks made at the Advisory Centre on WTO Law, Switzerland, June, available at www.acwl.ch/e/about/cooperation_e.aspx, accessed 18 October 2007.

Bagwell, Kyle, Mavroidis, Petros C. and Staiger, Robert W. 2002. ‘It's a Question of Market Access’, American Journal of International Law 96(1): 56–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, Robert and Cave, Martin 1999. Understanding Regulation (Oxford).Google ScholarPubMed

Bartels, Lorand 2002. ‘Article XX of GATT and the Problem of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction – The Case of Trade Measures for the Protection of Human Rights’, Journal of World Trade 36(2): 353–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, Joseph R. 1999. ‘Unilateral Trade Measures to Conserve the World's Living Resources: An Environmental Breakthrough for the GATT in the WTO Sea Turtle Case’, Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 23: 355–411.Google Scholar

Berrisch, Georg 2003. ‘Das allgemeine Zoll- und Handelsabkommen (GATT 1994)’, in Prieß and Berrisch, WTO-Handbuch, pp. 71–168.

Bhagwati, Jagdish 2000. ‘On Thinking Clearly about the Linkage between Trade and the Environment’, Environment and Development Economics 5: 485–96.Google Scholar

Bhagwati, Jagdish 2002. ‘Afterword: The Question of Linkage’, American Journal of International Law 96(1): 126–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhagwati, Jagdish and Hudec, Robert E. (eds.) 1996. Fair Trade and Harmonization (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Bhala, Raj and Kennedy, Kevin 1998. World Trade Law (Charlottesville).Google Scholar

Bishop, Matthew, Kay, John and Mayer, Colin (eds.) 1995. The Regulatory Challenge (Oxford).Google Scholar

Bogdansky, Daniel 2000. ‘What's So Bad about Unilateral Action to Protect the Environment?’, European Journal of International Law 11(2): 339–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogdandy, Armin, Mavroidis, Petros C. and Mény, Yves (eds.) 2002. European Integration and International Co-ordination (The Hague).Google Scholar

Bogdandy, Armin and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.) 2003. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law:Vol. 7 (Leiden).Google Scholar

Boss, Alfred, Laaser, Claus-Friedrich, Schatz, Klaus-Werneret al. 1996. Deregulierung in Deutschland, Kieler Studien 275 (Tübingen).Google Scholar

Boyce, James K. 2002. The Political Economy of the Environment (Cheltenham).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyce, James K. ‘Green and Brown? Globalization and the Environment’ 2004. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 20(1): 105–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyer, Robert and Saillard, Yves (eds.) 2002. ‘A Summary of Régulation Theory’, Régulation Theory. The State of the Art (London), pp. 36–44.Google Scholar

Brack, Duncan 2002. ‘Environmental Treaties and Trade: Multilateral Environmental Agreements and the Multilateral Trading System’, in Sampson and Chambers (eds.), Trade, Environment, and the Millennium, pp. 321–52.

Breyer, Stephen 1979. ‘Analyzing Regulatory Failure: Mismatches, Less Restrictive Alternatives, and Reform’, Harvard Law Review 92: 549–609.Google ScholarPubMed

Breyer, Stephen 1984. ‘Analyzing regulatory failure: Mismatches, Less Restrictive Alternatives, and Reform’, in Ogus and Veljanovski (eds.), Readings in the Economics of Law and Regulation, p. 238.

Breyer, Stephen 1990. ‘Regulation and Deregulation in the United States: Airlines, Telecommunications and Antitrust’, in Majone (ed.), Deregulation or Re-Regulation?, pp. 7–58.

Bronckers, Marco and McNelis, Natalie 2002. ‘Rethinking the “Like Product” Definition in GATT 1994: Anti-Dumping and Environmental Protection’, in Cottier and Mavroidis (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination, pp. 345–85.

Bronckers, Marco and Quick, Reinhard (eds.) 2000. New Directions in International Economic Law (London).Google Scholar

Bürgi Bonanomi, Lisa 2007. ‘Agricultural Trade: Taking Integration Seriously’, 21 May 2007, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=980208.

Bydlinski, Franz 1991. Juristische Methodenlehre und Rechtsbegriff, 2nd edn. (Wien).

Cameron, James, Demaret, Paul and Geradin, Damien 1994. Trade and the Environment: The Search for Balance (London).Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio 1995. Self-Determination of Peoples (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Chang, Howard F. 2000. ‘Toward a Greener GATT: Environmental Trade Measures and the Shrimp-Turtle Case’, Southern California Law Review 74: 31–47.Google Scholar

Chang, Howard F. 2005. ‘Environmental Trade Measures, the Shrimp-turtle Rulings, and the Ordinary Meaning of the Text of the GATT’, Chapman Law Review 8: 25–51.Google Scholar

Chang, Seung Wha 1997. ‘GATTing a Green Trade Barrier. Eco-Labelling and the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade’, Journal of World Trade 31(1): 137–59.Google Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve 1991. ‘Exploring the Environmental Exceptions in GATT Article XX’, Journal of World Trade 25: 37–55.Google Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve 1992. ‘GATT and the Environment. Examining the Issues’, International Environmental Affairs 4(3): 203–33.Google Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve 1994. ‘Green Roots, Bad Pruning: GATT Rules and their Application to Environmental Trade Measures’, Tulane Environmental Law Journal 7(2): 299–352.Google Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve 1997. ‘WTO's Alcoholic Beverages Decision’, RECIEL 6(2): 198–203.Google Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve 1998. ‘The Moral Exception in Trade Policy’, Virginia Journal of International Law 38: 689–745.Google Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve 2001a. ‘Solving the PPMs Puzzle’, PSIO Occasional Paper (Geneva).Google Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve 2001b. ‘Rethinking WTO Trade Sanctions’, American Journal of International Law 95(4): 792–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve 2002. ‘The Law of Environmental “PPMs” in the WTO: Debunking the Myth of Illegality’, Yale Journal of International Law 27: 59–110.Google Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve 2005. ‘Belgian Family Allowances and the Challenge of Origin-based Discrimination’, World Trade Review 4(1): 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve 2007a. ‘The WTO's Environmental Progress’, Journal of International Economic Law 10: 685–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve 2007b. ‘A New WTO Paradigm for Trade and Environment’, Singapore Year Book of International Law, e-publication.Google Scholar

Cheyne, Ilona 2009. ‘Proportionality, Proximity and Environmental Labelling’, Journal of International Economic Law 12: 927–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cho, Sungjoon 2003. Free Markets and Social Regulation: A Reform Agenda of the Global Trading System (London).Google Scholar

Cho, Sungjoon 2005. ‘Linkage of Free Trade and Social Regulation: Moving Beyond the Entropic Dilemma’, Chicago Journal of International Law 5(2): 625–74.Google Scholar

Choi, Won-Mog 2003. Like Products in International Trade Law. Towards a Consistent GATT/WTO Jurisprudence (New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christian, Ernest and Hufbauer, Gary Clyde 2004. ‘End this Damaging Tax and Trade Charade’, Financial Times, 8 March.

Cleveland, Sarah H. 2002. ‘Human Rights Sanctions and International Trade: A Theory of Compatibility’, Journal of International Economic Law 5(1): 133–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cordonier Segger, Marie-Claire 2009. ‘The Role of International Forums in the Advancement of Sustainable Development’, Sustainable Development Law and Policy 10(4).Google Scholar

Cottier, Thomas 1996. ‘The Impact of New Technologies on Multilateral Trade Regulation and Governance’, Chicago-Kent Law Review415–35.Google Scholar

Cottier, Thomas 1998. ‘The WTO and Environmental Law: Three Points for Discussion’, in Fijalkowski, Agata and Cameron, James (eds.), Trade and the Environment: Bridging the Gap (London), pp. 56–64.Google Scholar

Cottier, Thomas 2000a. ‘From Progressive Liberalization to Progressive Regulation in WTO Law’, Journal of International Economic Law 9: 779–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cottier, Thomas 2000b. ‘Limits to International Trade: the Constitutional Challenge’, ASIL Proceedings220–2.Google Scholar

Cottier, Thomas 2002. ‘Trade and Human Rights: A Relationship to Discover’, Journal of International Economic Law 5(1): 111–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cottier, Thomas and Hertig, Maya 2003. ‘The Prospects of 21st Century Constitutionalism’, in Bogdandy and Wolfrum (eds.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, pp. 261–328.

Cottier, Thomas and Khorana, Sangeeta 2005. ‘Linkages between Freedom of Expression and Unfair Competition Rules in International Trade: The Hertel Case and Beyond’, in Cottier, Pauwelyn and Bürgi (eds.), Human Rights and International Trade, pp. 245–72.

Cottier, Thomas and Nadakavukaren Schefer, Krista 2000. ‘Conflict Resolution in the World Trade Organization. Assessing the story so far: hope on the horizon?’, in Ward and Brack (eds.), Trade, Investment and the Environment, pp. 187–202.

Cottier, Thomas and Mavroidis, Petros C. 2002a. Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar

Cottier, Thomas and Mavroidis, Petros C 2002b. ‘Conclusions’, in Cottier and Mavroidis (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination, pp. 389–94.

Cottier, Thomas and Mavroidis, Petros C 2003. The Role of the Judge in International Trade Regulation. Experience and Lessons for the WTO (Ann Arbor).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cottier, Thomas and Oesch, Matthias 2005. International Trade Regulation. Law and Policy in the WTO, the European Union and Switzerland (London).Google Scholar

Cottier, Thomas, Pauwelyn, Joost and Bürgi, Elisabeth 2005a. Human Rights and International Trade (New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cottier, Thomas, Pauwelyn, Joost and Bürgi, Elisabeth 2005b. ‘Linking Trade Regulation and Human Rights in International Law: An Overview’, in Cottier, Pauwelyn and Bürgi (eds.), Human Rights and International Trade, pp. 1–26.

Cottier, Thomas, Tuerk, Elisabeth and Panizzon, Marion 2003. ‘Handel und Umwelt im Recht der WTO: Auf dem Weg zur praktischen Konkordanz’, ZURSonderheft 155–66.Google Scholar

Dahm, Georg, Delbrück, Jost and Wolfrum, Rüdiger 2002. Völkerrecht. Bd. 1.3, Die Formen völkerrechtlichen Handelns, 2nd edn. (Berlin).Google Scholar

Daly, Herman 1991. ‘The Perils of Free Trade’, Scientific American 269(5): 50–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davey, William J. and Pauwelyn, Joost 2002. ‘MFN Unconditionality: A Legal Analysis of the Concept in View of its Evolution in the GATT/WTO Jurisprudence with Particular Reference to the Issue of “Like Product”’, in Cottier and Mavroidis (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination, pp. 13–50.

Deardorff, Alan V. 2000. ‘The Economics of Government Market Intervention, and its International Dimension’, in Bronckers and Quick (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law, pp. 71–84.

Demaret, Paul and Stewardson, Raoul 1994. ‘Border Tax Adjustments under the GATT and EC Law and General Implications for Environmental Taxes’, Journal of World Trade 28(4): 5–65.Google Scholar

Desmedt, Axel 2001. ‘Proportionality in WTO Law’, Journal of International Economic Law 4(3): 441–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diebold, Nicolas F. 2008. ‘The Morals and Order Exceptions in WTO Law: Balancing the Toothless Tiger and the Undermining Mole’, Journal of International Economic Law 11(1): 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diem, Andreas 1996. Freihandel und Umweltschutz in GATT und WTO (Baden Baden).Google Scholar

Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter and Ehring, Lothar 2005. ‘Are WTO Decision-making Procedures Adequate for Making, Revising, and Implementing Worldwide and “Plurilateral” Rules?’, in Petersmann (ed.), Developing Countries in the Doha Round, pp. 91–118.

Ehring, Lothar 2002. ‘De Facto Discrimination in WTO Law: National and Most-Favored-Nation Treatment – or Equal Treatment?’, Journal of World Trade 36(5): 921–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epiney, Astrid 2000. ‘Welthandel und Umwelt – Ein Beitrag zur Dogmatik der Art. III, IX, XX GATT’, Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt 2: 77–86.Google Scholar

Esty, Daniel C. 2000. ‘Environment and the Trading System: Picking up the Post-Seattle Pieces’, in Schott (ed.), The WTO after Seattle, pp. 243–52.

Esty, Daniel C. and Geradin, Damien 1998. ‘Environmental Protection and International Competitiveness. A Conceptual Framework’, Journal of World Trade 32(2): 5–46.Google Scholar

Fauchald, Ole Kristian 2003. ‘Flexibility and Predictability under the World Trade Organization's Non-Discrimination Clauses’, Journal of World Trade 37(3): 443–82.Google Scholar

Feddersen, Christoph T. 1998. ‘Focusing on Substantive Law in International Economic Relations: The Public Morals of GATT's Article XX(a) and “Conventional” Rules of Interpretation’, Minnesota Journal of Global Trade75–122.Google Scholar

Feddersen, Christoph T. 2002. Der ordre public in the WTO. Auslegung und Bedeutung des Art. XX lit a) GATT im Rahmen der WTO-Streitbeilegung (Berlin).Google Scholar

Ferrell, Jessica K. 2005. ‘Controlling Flags of Convenience: One Measure to Stop Overfishing of Collapsing Fish Stocks’, Environmental Law 35: 323–90.Google Scholar

Frank, Robert H. 2005. Microeconomics and Behavior (New York).Google Scholar

French, Duncan 2005 ‘Treaty Interpretation and the Incorporation of Extraneous Legal Rules’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 55(2): 281–314.Google Scholar

Frowein, Jochen A. 1994. ‘Reactions By Not Directly Affected States to Breaches of Public International Law’, Recueil des Cours (Collected Courses) 248(4): 345–437.Google Scholar

Fukasaku, Kiichiro 2000. ‘Special and Differential Treatment for Developing Countries: Does it Help to Help Themselves?’, UN-WIDER, Working Papers No. 197.

Gaines, Sanford E. 2001. ‘The WTO's Reading of the GATT Article XX Chapeau: A Disguised Restriction on Environmental Measures’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 22(4): 739–860.Google Scholar

Gaines, Sanford E. 2002. ‘Processes and Production Methods: How to Produce Sound Policy for Environmental PPM-Based Trade Measures?’, Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 27: 383–432.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Kevin P. and Werksman, Jacob 2002. International Trade & Sustainable Development (London).Google Scholar

Gandhi, Samir R. 2005. ‘Regulating the Use of Voluntary Environmental Standards Within the World Trade Organization Legal Regime: Making a Case for Developing Countries’, Journal of World Trade 39(5): 855–80.Google Scholar

Garcia, Frank 1999. ‘The Global Market and Human Rights: Trading Away the Human Rights Principle’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law 25: 51–97Google Scholar

Gehring, Markus W. and Jessen, Henning 2005 ‘Gesundheitspolizeiliche und pflanzenschutzrechtliche Massnahmen (SPS)’, in Hilf and Oeter (eds.), WTO-Recht. Rechtsordnung des Welthandels, p. 366.

Geradin, Damien 2000. ‘Overview: A Lawyer's View’, in Ward and Brack (eds.), Trade, Investment and the Environment, pp. 91–101.

Germann, O. A. 1967. Probleme und Methoden der Rechtsfindung (Bern).Google Scholar

Ginzky, Harald 1999. ‘Garnelen und Schildkröten – Zu den umweltpolitischen Handlungsspielräumen der WTO-Mitgliedstaaten’, ZUR 4: 216–22.Google Scholar

Goettsche, Götz 2005. ‘WTO als Rechtsordnung’, in Hilf and Oeter (eds.), Trade, Investment and the Environment, § 7.

Goh, Gavin 2004. ‘The World Trade Organization, Kyoto and Energy Tax Adjustments at the Border’, Journal of World Trade 38(3): 395–423.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Neva, Nelson, Julie and Ackerman, Frank 2004. Microeconomics in Context (Boston, MA).Google Scholar

Graber, Christoph Beat 2006. ‘The New UNESCO Convention on Cultural Diversity: A Counterbalance to the WTO?’, Journal of International Economic Law 9: 553–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, Keith 2000. ‘Delinking Trade, Environmental Protection, and Labor Standards’, Environment and Development Economics 5: 504–10.Google Scholar

Griller, Stefan 2003. International Economic Governance and Non-Economic Concerns (Wien).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grossmann, Harald, Busse, Matthias, Fuchs, Deike and Koopmann, Georg 2002. Sozialstandards in der Welthandelsordnung (Baden Baden).Google Scholar

Guest, Jim 2002. ‘Consumers and Consumerism in America Today’, The Journal of Consumer Affairs 36(2): 139–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guzman, Andrew T. 2004. ‘Global Governance and the WTO’, Harvard International Law Journal 45: 303–51.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Keith 1989. ‘Rule and Discretion in Comparative Perspective: The Case of Social Regulation’, Ohio State Law Journal 50: 663–79.Google Scholar

Heintschel von Heinegg, Wolf 2004 ‘Die völkerrechtlichen Verträge als Hauptrechtsquelle des Völkerrechts’, in Ipsen (ed.), Völkerrecht, pp. 112–209.

Herwig, Alexia and Hüller, Torsten 2008. ‘Zur normativen Legitimität der Welthandelsordnung‚ in Meinhard Hilf (ed.), Perspektiven des Internationalen Wirtschaftsrechts.

Hahn, Michael J. 1996. Die einseitige Aussetzung von GATT-Verpflichtungen als Repressalie (Berlin 1996).Google Scholar

Hilf, Meinhard 2000. ‘Freiheit des Welthandels contra Umweltschutz?’, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht481–90.Google Scholar

Hilf, Meinhard 2001. ‘Power, Rules and Principles – Which Orientation for WTO/GATT Law?’, Journal of International Economic Law 4(1): 111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilf, Meinhard 2003. ‘Die Konstitutionalisierung der Welthandelsordnung. Struktur, Institutionen und Verfahren’, Berichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Völkerrecht 40: 257.Google Scholar

Hilf, Meinhard and Oeter, Stefan 2005. WTO-Recht. Rechtsordnung des Welthandels (Baden Baden).Google Scholar

Hilf, Meinhard and Puth, Sebastian 2002. ‘The Principle of Proportionality on its Way into WTO/GATT Law’, in Bogdandy, Mavroidis and Mény (eds.), European Integration and International Co-ordination, pp. 199–218.

Horlick, Gary N. and Clarke, Peggy A. 1994. ‘The 1994 WTO Subsidies Agreement’, World Competition 17(4): 41.Google Scholar

Howse, Robert 2002. ‘The Appellate Body Rulings in the Shrimp/Turtle Case: A New Legal Baseline for the Trade and Environment Debate’, Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 27: 491.Google Scholar

Howse, Robert and Nicolaidis, Kalypso 2003. ‘Legitimacy through “Higher Law”? Why Constitutionalizing the WTO is a Step Too Far’, in Cottier and Mavroidis (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination, pp. 307–48.

Howse, Robert and Regan, Donald 2000. ‘The Product/Process Distinction: An Illusory Basis for Disciplining “Unilateralism” in Trade Policy’, European Journal of International Law 11(2): 249–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howse, Robert and Trebilcock, Michael J. 1996. ‘The Fair Trade-Free Trade Debate: Trade, Labour, and the Environment’, International Review of Law and Economics 16: 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howse, Robert and Trebilcock, Michael J. 2005. ‘Trade Policy and Labor Standards’, Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 14(2): 261–300.Google Scholar

Howse, Robert and Tuerk, Elisabeth 2006. ‘The WTO Impact on Internal Regulations’, in G. Bermann, and P. Mavroidis (eds.), Trade and Human Health and Safety, p. 91.Google Scholar

Hudec, Robert E. 1990. The GATT Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy, 2nd edn. (Salem).Google Scholar

Hudec, Robert E. 1996. ‘GATT Legal Restraints on the Use of Trade Measures against Foreign Environmental Practices’, in Bhagwati and Hudec (eds.), Fair Trade and Harmonization, pp. 95–174.

Hudec, Robert E. 1998. ‘GATT/WTO Constraints on National Regulation: Requiem for an “Aims and Effects” Test’, The International Lawyer 32: 619–49, and in Essays on the Nature of International Trade Law (London, 1999).Google Scholar

Hudec, Robert E. 2000. ‘The Product–Process Doctrine in GATT/WTO Jurisprudence’, in Bronckers and Quick (eds.), New Directions, pp. 187–217.

Hudec, Robert E. 2002. ‘“Like Product”: The Differences in Meaning in GATT Articles I and III’, in Cottier and Mavroidis (eds.), Regulatory Barriers, pp. 101–23.

Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Schott, Jeffrey J. and Elliot, Kimberly Ann 1990. Economic Sanctions Reconsidered: History and Current Policy, 2nd edn. (Washington, DC).Google Scholar

Humbert, Franziska 2009. The Challenge of Child Labour in International Law (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, David, Salzman, James and Zaelke, Durwood 2002. International Environmental Law and Policy, 2nd edn. (New York).Google Scholar

Husted, Steven and Melvin, Michael 2006. International Economics, 7th edn. (Boston, MA).Google Scholar

Hüller, Thorsten and Meier, Matthias Leonhard 2006. ‘Fixing the Codex? Global Food Safety Governance under Review’, in Christian Joerges, and Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (eds.), Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation (Oregon), pp. 267–99.Google Scholar

Imkamp, Heiner 2000. ‘The Interest of Consumers in Ecological Product Information is Growing – Evidence from Two German Surveys’, Journal of Consumer Policy 23(2): 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ipsen, Knut 2004. Völkerrecht, 5th edn. (Munich).Google Scholar

Isaac, Grant E. and Kerr, William A. 2003. ‘Genetically Modified Organisms and Trade Rules: Identifying Important Challenges for the WTO’, The World Economy 26:29–42.Google Scholar

Iwasawa, Yuji 2002. ‘WTO Dispute Settlement as Judicial Supervision’, Journal of International Economic Law 5(2): 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, John H. 1969. World Trade and the Law of GATT: A Legal Analysis of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (Charlottesville).Google Scholar

Jackson, John H. 1989. ‘National Treatment Obligations and Non-Tariff Barriers’, Michigan Journal of International Law 10: 207–24.Google Scholar

Jackson, John H. 1992. ‘World Trade Rules and Environmental Policies: Congruence or Conflict?’, Washington and Lee Law Review 49: 1227–78.Google ScholarPubMed

Jackson, John H. 1994. ‘Greening the GATT: Trade Rules and Environmental Policy’, in Cameron, Demaret and Geradin (eds.), Trade and the Environment, pp. 39–51.

Jackson, John H. 1997. The World Trading System, 2nd edn. (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Jackson, John H. 2000a. The Jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO – Insights on Treaty Law and Economic Relations (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Jackson, John H. 2000b. ‘Comments on Shrimp/Turtle and the Product/Process Distinction’, European Journal of International Law 11(2): 303–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, John H. 2000c. ‘The Perils of Globalization and the World Trading System’, Fordham International Law Journal 24: 371–82.Google Scholar

Jackson, John H. 2001. ‘The WTO “Constitution” and Proposed Reforms: Seven “Mantras” Revisited’, Journal of International Economic Law 67(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, John H. 2002. ‘Afterword: The Linkage Problem-Comments on Five Texts’, American Journal of International Law 96(1): 118–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, John H. 2003. ‘Sovereignty-Modern: A New Approach to an Outdated Concept’, The American Journal of International Law 97(4): 782–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, John H. 2005. ‘The Role of International Law in Trade’, Georgetown Journal of International Law 36(3): 663–67.Google Scholar

Jackson, John H. 2006. Sovereignty, the WTO and Changing Fundamentals of International Law (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, Allan 1986. Sovereign Statehood: The Basis of International Society (London).Google Scholar

Jenny, Frédéric 2003. ‘WTO Core Principles and Trade’, International Antitrust Law and Policy: Annual Proceedings of the Fordham Corporate Law Institute 30: 703–61.Google Scholar

Joerges, Christian 2006. ‘Constitutionalism in Postnational Constellations: Contrasting Social Regulation in the EU and in the WTO’, in Joerges and Petersmann (eds.), Constitutionalism, Mulitlevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation, pp. 491–527.

Joerges, Christian and Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (eds.), Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation (Oregon), pp. 5–58.

Joerges, Christian, Sand, Inger-Johanne and Teubner, Gunther 2004. Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford).

Jones, Kent 2002. ‘The WTO Core Agreement, Non-Trade Issues and Institutional Integrity’, World Trade Review 1(3): 257–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joshi, Manoj 2004. ‘Are Eco-Labels Consistent with World Trade Organization Agreements?’, Journal of World Trade 38(1): 69–92.Google Scholar

Kay, John and Vickers, John 1990. ‘Regulatory Reform: An Appraisal’, in Majone (ed.), Deregulation or Re-Regulation?, pp. 223–51.

Kelly, J. Patrick 2005. ‘The Seduction of the Appellate Body: Shrimp/Sea Turtle I and II and the Proper Role of States in WTO Governance’, Cornell International Law Journal 38: 459–91.Google Scholar

Kipel, Alice Alexandra 1996. ‘Special and Differential Treatment for Developing Countries’, in Stewart (ed.), The World Trade Organization, p. 617.

Koskenniemi, Martti and Leino, Päivi 2002. ‘Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties’, Leiden Journal of International Law 15: 553–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti and Mosley, Christopher 2004. ‘The Work of the International Law Commission at its Fifty-Fifth Session’, Nordic Journal of International Law 73(1): 99–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krueger, Anne O. 1998. The WTO as an International Organization (Chicago).Google Scholar

Kube, Hanno 2001. National Tax Law and the Transnational Control of State Aids, EUI Working Paper LAW No. 2001/9.

Kuijper, Pieter Jan 1994. ‘The Law of GATT as Special Field of International Law. Ignorance: Further Refinement or Self-contained System of International Law?’, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law XXV: 227–57.Google Scholar

Kysar, Douglas A. 2004. ‘Preferences for Processes: The Process/Product Distinction and the Regulation of Consumer Choice’, Harvard Law Review 118: 525–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch 1970. International Law. Collected Papers: Vol. I (Cambridge).

Lammenett, Klaus 1964. Die Behandlung von Wohlstandseffekten in der reinen Theorie des internationalen Handels (Mainz).Google Scholar

Leebron, David W. 2002. ‘Linkages’, American Journal of International Law 96(1): 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lell, Ottmar 2004. ‘Die neue Kennzeichnungspflicht für gentechnisch hergestellt Lebensmittel – ein Verstoß gegen das Welthandelsrecht?’, EuZW108–12Google Scholar

Lennard, Michael 2002. ‘Navigating by the Stars: Interpreting the WTO Agreements’, Journal of International Economic Law 5: 17–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lopez-Hurtado, Carlos 2002. ‘Social Labelling and the WTO’, Journal of International Economic 5(3): 719–46.Google Scholar

Lopez-Mata, Rosendo 2001. ‘Income Taxation, International Competitiveness and the World Trade Organization's Rules on Subsidies: Lessons to the US and to the World from the FSC Dispute’, Tax Lawyer 54(3): 577–616.Google Scholar

Loureiro, Maria L. and Lotade, Justus 2004. ‘Do Fair Trade and Eco-labels in Coffee Wake Up the Consumer Conscience?’, Ecological Economics 53(1): 129–38.Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, Andreas 2002. International Economic Law (New York).Google Scholar

Lowi, Theodore 1986. The Welfare State, the New Regulation, and the Rule of Law (Siegen).Google Scholar

MacGowan, Daniel A. 1978. Consumer Economics (Chicago).

Macklem, Patrick 2002. ‘Labour Law Beyond Borders’, Journal of International Economic Law 5(3): 605–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico (ed.) 1990a. Deregulation or Re-Regulation? Regulatory Reform in Europe and the United States (New York).Google Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico 1990b. ‘Introduction’, in Majone (ed.), Deregulation or Re-Regulation.

Majone, Giandomenico 1996a. Regulating Europe (London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico 1996b. ‘Regulation and its Modes’, in Majone (ed.), Deregulation or Re-Regulation, pp. 9–27.

Majone, Giandomenico 1996c. ‘Theories of Regulation’, in Majone (ed.), Deregulation or Re-Regulation, pp. 28–46.

Majone, Giandomenico 1996d. ‘The Rise of Statutory Regulation in Europe’, in Majone (ed.), Deregulation or Re-Regulation, pp. 47–60.

Majone, Giandomenico 1997. ‘The New European Agencies: Regulation by Information’, Journal of European Public Policy 4(2): 262–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malanczuk, Peter 1997. Akehurst's Modern Introduction to International Law, 7th edn. (London).Google Scholar

Mankiw, Nicholas Gregory 2006. Principles of Microeconomics, 4th edn. (London).Google Scholar

Mann, Howard and Porter, Stephan 2003. The State of Trade and Environment Law 2003. Implications for Doha and Beyond (Winnipeg).Google Scholar

Manzini, Pietro 1999. ‘Environmental Exceptions of Art. XX GATT 1994 Revisited in the Light of the Rules of Interpretation of General International Law’, in Mengozzi (ed.), International Trade Law on the 50th Anniversary of the Multilateral Trade System, pp. 811–48.

Marceau, Gabrielle 1999. ‘A Call for Coherence in International Law: Praises for the Prohibition Against “Clinical Isolation” in WTO Dispute Settlement’, Journal of World Trade 33(5): 87–152.Google Scholar

Marceau, Gabrielle 2001. ‘Conflicts of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdictions. The Relationship between the WTO Agreement and MEAs and other Treaties’, Journal of World Trade 35(6): 1081–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marceau, Gabrielle 2002. ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights’, European Journal of International Law 13(4): 753–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marceau, Gabrielle and Trachtman, Joel P. 2002. ‘The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. A Map of the World Trade Organization Law of Domestic Regulation of Goods’, Journal of World Trade 36(5): 811–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maskus, Keith 2002. Regulatory Standards in the WTO: Comparing Intellectual Property Rights with Competition Policy, Environmental Protection, and Core Labor Standards', World Trade Review 1(2): 135–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsushita, Mitsuo, Schoenbaum, Thomas J. and Mavroidis, Petros C. 2004. The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy (Oxford).Google Scholar

Mattoo, Aaditya and Subramanian, Arvind 1998. ‘Regulatory Autonomy and Multilateral Disciplines: the Dilemma and a Possible Resolution’, Journal of International Economic Law 1(2): 303–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mattoo, Aaditya and Sauvé, Pierre (eds.) 2003. Domestic Regulation and Service Trade Liberalization, The World Bank.

Mavroidis, Petros C. 2000a. ‘Trade and Environment after the Shrimps-Turtles Litigation’, Journal of World Trade 34(1): 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C. 2000b. ‘Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place’, European Journal of International Law 11(4): 763–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C. 2005. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. A Commentary (New York).Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C. 2007. Trade in Goods. The GATT and the Other Agreements Regulating Trade in Goods (New York).Google Scholar

Maynes, Scott E. 2003. ‘Marketing – One Consumer Disaster’, The Journal of Consumer Affairs 37(2): 196–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCrudden, Christopher 1999. ‘International and Economic Law and the Pursuit of Human Rights: A Framework for Discussion of the Legality of “Selective Purchasing” Laws under the WTO Government Procurement Agreement’, Journal of International Economic Law 2: 3–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCrudden, Christopher and Davies, Anne 2000. ‘A Perspective on Trade and Labour Rights’, Journal of International Economic Law 3: 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McEldowney, John 1995. ‘Law and Regulation: Current Issues and Future Directions’, in Bishop, Kay and Mayer (eds.), The Regulatory Challenge, pp. 408–23.

McLachlan, Campbell 2005. ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 54: 279–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNair, Arnold Duncan 1986. The Law of Treaties (New York).Google Scholar

McRae, Donald 2000. ‘GATT Article XX and the WTO Appellate Body’, in Bronckers and Quick (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law, pp. 219–36.

McRae, Peter 2002. ‘The Search for Meaning: Continuing Problems with the Interpretation of Treaties’, Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 33(2): 8.Google Scholar

Meng, Werner 1994. Extraterritoriale Jurisdiktion im öffentlichen Wirtschaftsrecht (Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mengozzi, Paolo (ed.) 1999. International Trade Law on the 50th Anniversary of the Multilateral Trade System (Milan).Google Scholar

Mitchell, Andrew D. 2008. Legal Principles in WTO Disputes (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitnick, Barry 1980. The Political Economy of Regulation (New York).Google Scholar

Mosler, Herrmann 1980. The International Society as a Legal Community (Alphen aan den Rijn).Google Scholar

Motaal, Doaa Abdel 2002. ‘The Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, the Committee on Trade and Environment, and Eco-labelling’, in Sampson and Chambers (eds.), Trade, Environment, and the Millennium, pp. 267–85.

Murase, Shinya 1995. ‘Perspectives from International Economic Law on Transnational Environmental Issues’, Recueil des Cours (Collected Courses) 253: 283–431.Google Scholar

Murphy, Dale D. 2005. ‘Interjurisdictional Competition and Regulatory Advantage’, Journal of International Economic Law 8(4): 891–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nadakavukaren Schefer, Krista 2010. Social Regulation in the WTO. Trade Policy and International Legal Development (Cheltenham).Google Scholar

Neumann, Jan and Türk, Elisabeth 2003. ‘Necessity Revisited: Proportionality in World Trade Organization Law after Korea-Beef, EC-Asbestos and EC-Sardines’, Journal of World Trade 37(1): 199–233.Google Scholar

Neumayer, Eric 2002. ‘WTO Rules and Multilateral Environmental Agreements’, in Gallagher and Werksman (eds.), International Trade & Sustainable Development, pp. 137–65.

Nielsen, Laura, The WTO, Animals and PPMs (Leiden).CrossRef

Nivola, Pietro S. (ed.) 1997. Comparative Disadvantages? Social Regulations and the Global Economy (Washington).Google Scholar

Nordström, Hakan and Vaughan, Scott 1999. ‘Special Studies: Trade and the Environment’, WTO.

Nowotny, Ewald 1999. Der öffentliche Sektor, 4th edn. (Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oesch, Matthias 2003a. ‘Commentary on EC – Asbestos’, International Trade Law Reports VI: 441–60.Google Scholar

Oesch, Matthias 2003b. Standards of Review in WTO Dispute Resolution (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ogus, Anthony 1992. ‘Regulatory Law: Some Lessons from the Past’, Legal Studies 12(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ogus, Anthony and Veljanovski, Cento (eds.) 1984. Readings in the Economics of Law and Regulation (Oxford).Google Scholar

Ohlhoff, Stefan 2003 ‘Streitbeilegung in der WTO’, in Prieß and Berrisch (eds.), WTO-Handbuch, p. 677.

Olson, Mancur 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar

Ortino, Federico 2006. ‘Treaty Interpretation and the WTO Appellate Body Report in US-Gambling: A Critique’, Journal of International Economic Law 9: 117–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oxley, Allan 2002. ‘Environmental Trade Sanctions: What is at Stake?’, Policy 18(4): 17–22.Google Scholar

Palmeter, David and Mavroidis, Petros C. 1998. ‘The WTO Legal System: Sources of Law’, American Journal of International Law 92: 398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pangestu, Mari 2000. ‘Special and Differential Treatment in the Millennium: Special for Whom and How Different?’, The World Economy 23(9): 1285–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost 2002. ‘Cross-agreement Complaints before the Appellate Body: A Case Study of the EC – Asbestos Dispute’, World Trade Review 1(1): 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost 2003. Conflict of Norms in Public International Law (Cambridge, MA).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost 2004. ‘Diversity or Cacophony?: New Sources of Norms in International Law Symposium, Reply to Joshua Meltzer’, Michigan Journal of International Law 25: 924–7.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost 2006. ‘Non-Traditional Patterns of Global Regulation: Is the WTO Missing the Boat?’, in Joerges, and Petersmann, (eds.), Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation (Oregon), pp. 199–227.Google Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich 1994. ‘Trade and Environmental Protection: The Practice of GATT and the European Community Compared’, in Cameron, Demaret and Geradin (eds.), Trade and the Environment, pp. 147–81.

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich 2000. ‘Prevention and Settlement of International Trade Disputes between the European Union and the United States’, Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 8: 233–60.Google Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich 2005a. ‘Human Rights and International Trade Law: Defining and Connecting the Two Fields’, in Cottier, Pauwelyn and Bürgi (eds.), Human Rights and International Trade, pp. 29–94.

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich 2005b. Developing Countries in the Doha Round (Florence).Google Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich 2006. ‘Multilevel Trade Governance in the WTO Regime Requires Multilevel Constitutionalism’, in Joerges and Petersmann (eds.), Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation, pp. 5–58.

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich 2008. ‘State Sovereignty, Popular Sovereignty and Individual Sovereignty, in Wenhua Shan, Penelope Simons and Singh, Dalvinder (eds.), Redefining Sovereignty in International Economic Law (Oxford), pp. 27–60.Google Scholar

Pindyck, Robert and Rubinfeld, Daniel 2004, Microeconomics (New Jersey).Google Scholar

Porges, Amelia and Trachtman, Joel P. 2003. ‘Robert Hudec and Domestic Regulation: The Resurrection of Aims and Effects’, Journal of World Trade 37(4): 783–99.Google Scholar

Prieß, Hans-Joachim and Berrisch, Georg M. 2003. WTO-Handbuch (Munich).Google Scholar

Puth, Sebastian 2003. WTO und Umwelt: Die Produkt-Prozess-Doktrin (Berlin).Google Scholar

Puth, Sebastian 2005. ‘WTO und Umwelt’, in Hilf and Oeter (eds.), WTO-Recht, § 30, pp. 577–600.

Quick, Reinhard 2000. ‘The Community's Regulation on Leg-Hold Traps: Creative Unilateralism Made Compatible with WTO Law through Bilateral Negotiations?’, in Bronckers and Quick (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law, pp. 239–57.

Quick, Reinhard and Lau, Christian 2001. ‘Kreativer Unilateralismus und die WTO – Die Tellereisen-Verordnung der EG im Lichte der “Shrimp/Turtle”–Entscheidung’, ZEuS 4(1): 97–126.Google Scholar

Quick, Reinhard and Lau, Christian 2003. ‘Environmentally Motivated Tax Distinctions and WTO Law’, Journal of International Economic Law 6(2): 419–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raustiala, Kal 2000. ‘Sovereignty and Multilateralism’, Chicago Journal of International Law 1: 401.Google Scholar

Regan, Donald 2002. ‘Regulatory Purpose and “Like Products” in Article III:4 of the GATT (With Additional Remarks on Article III:2)’, Journal of World Trade 36(3): 443–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rege, Vinod 1994. ‘GATT Law and Environment-Related Issues Affecting the Trade of Developing Countries’, Journal of World Trade 6: 95–169.Google Scholar

Reiterer, Michael 1994. ‘The International Legal Aspects of Process and Production Methods’, World Competition Law and Economics Review 17: 111–28.Google Scholar

Roessler, Frieder 1996. ‘Diverging Domestic Policies and Multilateral Trade Integration’, in Bhagwati and Hudec (eds.), Fair Trade and Harmonization, pp. 21–56.

Roessler, Frieder 1998. ‘Domestic Policy Objectives and the Multilateral Trade Order: Lessons from the Past’, in Krueger (ed.), The WTO as an International Organization, pp. 213–29.

Ruge, Nicole 2002. Die Zulässigkeit staatlicher Umweltschutzsubventionen nach dem EG-Vertrag und dem GATT 1994/WTO Regelwerk (Osnabrück).Google Scholar

Sampson, Gary P. and Chambers, W. Bradnee (eds.) 2002, Trade, Environment, and the Millennium, 2nd edn. (Tokyo).Google Scholar

Samuelson, Paul A. and Nordhaus, William D. 2005. Economics, 18th edn. (New York).Google Scholar

Sands, Philippe 2000. ‘“Unilateralism”, Values, and International Law’, European Journal of International Law 11(2): 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schlagenhof, Markus 1995. ‘Trade Measures Based on Environmental Processes and Production Methods’, Journal of World Trade 29(6): 123–55.Google Scholar

Schlesinger, Arthur 1958. The Age of Roosevelt. The Coming of the New Deal (Boston, MA).Google Scholar

Schneider, Egon and Schapp, Friedrich E. 2006. Logik für Juristen (Munich).Google Scholar

Schneuwly, Philippe 2003. ‘Sind Handelssanktionen ein geeignetes Mittel zur Durchsetzung von Arbeitsnormen? Eine Untersuchung der Wirksamkeit der Sozialklausel im US GSP’, Aussenwirtschaft 58(1): 121–44.Google Scholar

Schoenbaum, Thomas 1992. ‘Free International Trade and Protection of the Environment: Irreconcilable Conflict?’, American Journal of International Law 86: 700–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schoenbaum, Thomas 1997. ‘International Trade and Protection of the Environment: The Continuing Search for Reconciliation’, American Journal of International Law 91(2): 268–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schott, Jeffrey J. (ed.) 2000. The WTO after Seattle (Washington DC).Google Scholar

Selznick, Philip 1985. ‘Focusing Organizational Research on Regulation’, in Roger G. Noll, (ed.), Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences (Berkeley, CA), pp. 363–7.Google Scholar

Sen, Anindya 1999. Microeconomics (New Delhi).Google Scholar

Shaw, Malcolm 1997. International Law, 4th edn. (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Showalter, Stephanie 2005. ‘The United States and Rising Shrimp Imports From Asia and Central America: An Economic or Environmental Issue?’, Vermont Law Review 29: 847–75.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Ian 1984. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd edn. (Manchester).Google Scholar

Smith, Adam 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Edinburgh).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steger, Debra P. 2002. ‘Afterword: The “Trade and …” Conundrum – A Commentary’, American Journal of International Law 96(1): 135–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, Louis L. 1971. ‘Consumer Protection Via Increased Information’, in David A. Aaker and George S. Day (eds.), Consumerism (New York), pp. 94–103.

Stern, Robert M. 2000. ‘Labor Standards and Trade’, in Bronckers and Quick (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law, pp. 425–38.

Stewart, Terence P. (ed.) 1996. The World Trade Organization (Washington, DC).

Stigler, George J. 1975a. The Citizen and the State (Chicago).Google Scholar

Stigler, George J. 1975b. ‘The Process of Economic Regulation’, in Stigler (ed.), The Citizen and the State (reprint from the Antitrust Bulletin 17(1), Spring 1972).

Stiglitz, Joseph E. 1975. ‘Equilibrium in Product Markets with Imperfect Information’, American Economic Review339–45.Google Scholar

Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2003. ‘Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics, Part 1’, The American Economist 47(2): 6–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2004. ‘Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics, Part 2’, The American Economist 48(1): 17–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoll, Peter-Tobias and Schorkopf, Frank 2002. WTO – Welthandelsordnung und Welthandelsrecht (Cologne).Google Scholar

Swagler, Roger M. 1979. Consumers and the Market (Lexington).Google Scholar

Swinbank, Alan 2006. ‘Like Products, Animal Welfare and the World Trade Organization’, Journal of World Trade 40(4): 687–711.Google Scholar

Sykes, Alan O. 2003. The Economics of WTO Rules on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, John M. Olin Law and Economics. Working Paper No. 186, Chicago Working Paper Series, May.

Teisl, Mario F. and Roe, Brian 1998. ‘The Economics of Labeling: An Overview of Issues for Health and Environmental Disclosure’, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review140–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thaggert, Henry L. 1994. ‘A Closer Look at the Tuna-Dolphin Case: “Like Products” and “Extrajurisdictionality” in the Trade and Environment Context’, in Cameron, Demaret and Geradin (eds.), Trade and the Environment, pp. 69–95.

Tietje, Christian 1995. ‘Voluntary Eco-Labelling Programmes and Questions of State Responsibility in the WTO/GATT Legal System’, Journal of World Trade 29(5): 123–58.Google Scholar

Tietje, Christian 1998. Normative Grundstrukturen der Behandlung nichttarifärer Handelshemmnisse in der WTO/GATT-Rechtsordnung (Berlin).Google Scholar

Tietje, Christian 2003. Das Übereinkommen über Technische Handelshemmnisse', in Prieß and Berrisch (eds.), WTO-Handbuch, pp. 273–326.

Tietje, Christian 2006. ‘Questionnaire International Economic Law’, in Zimmermann and Hofmann (eds.), Unity and Diversity in International Law (Berlin).

Trachtman, Joel P. 2002. ‘Institutional Linkage: Transcending “Trade and …”’, American Journal of International Law 96: 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trachtman, Joel P. 2003. ‘Lessons for the GATS from Existing WTO Rules on Domestic Regulation’, in Mattoo and Sauvé (eds.), Domestic Regulation and Service Trade Liberalization, pp. 57–81.

Trachtman, Joel P. 2004. Book review: conflict of norms in public international law. By Joost Pauwelyn. American Journal of International Law 98: 855–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vahrenkamp, Kai 1991. Verbraucherschutz bei asymmetrischer Information. Informationsökonomische Analysen verbraucherpolitischer Maßnahmen (Munich).Google Scholar

Calster, Geert, International and EU Trade Law: The Environmental Challenge (London).

Damme, Isabelle 2006. ‘Sixth Annual WTO Conference: An Overview’, Journal of International Economic Law 9(3): 749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damme, Isabelle 2009. Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body (New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bossche, Peter, Schrijver, Nico and Faber, Gerrit 2007. Unilateral Measures addressing Non-Trade Concerns, The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands, The HagueGoogle Scholar

Scherpenberg, Jens and Thiel, Elke (eds.) 1998. Towards Rival Regionalism? US and EU Regional Regulatory Regime Building (Baden Baden).Google Scholar

Vázquez, Carlos Manuel 2003. ‘Trade Sanctions and Human Rights – Past, Present, and Future’, Journal of International Economic Law 6(4): 797–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verdross, Alfred and Simma, Bruno 1984. Universelles Völkerrecht: Theorie und Praxis, 3rd edn. (Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verhoosel, Gaetan 2002. National Treatment and WTO Dispute Settlement (Oxford).Google Scholar

Villiger, Mark E. 1985. Customary International Law and Treaties (Leiden).Google Scholar

Vogel, David 1997. ‘Trouble for Us and Trouble for Them. Social Regulations as Trade Barriers’, in Nivola, (ed.), Comparative Disadvantages?, pp. 98–145.

Vranes, Erich 2009a. Trade and the Environment. Fundamental Issues in International Law, WTO Law, and Legal Theory (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vranes, Erich 2009b. ‘The WTO and Regulatory Freedom: WTO Disciplines on Market Access, Non-Discrimination and Domestic Regulation Relating to Trade in Goods and Services’, Journal of International Economic Law 12(4): 953–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallace, Rebecca M. M. 2002. International Law, 4th edn. (London).Google Scholar

Ward, Halina and Brack, Duncan (eds.) 2000. Trade, Investment and the Environment (London).Google Scholar

Westen, Peter 1983. ‘The Meaning of Equality in Law, Science, Math, and Morals: A Reply’, Michigan Law Review 81: 604–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiers, Jochen 2001. ‘WTO Rules and Environmental Production and Processing Methods (PPMs)’, ERA Forum, scripta iuris europaei 4: 101–11.Google Scholar

Wilcox, William K. 1998. ‘GATT-based Protectionism and the Definition of a Subsidy’, Boston University International Law Journal 16: 129–63.Google Scholar

Winerman, Marc 2003. ‘The Origins of the FTC: Concentration, Cooperation, Control, and Competition’, Antitrust Law Journal 71(1): 1–97.Google Scholar

Winter, Gerd 2003. ‘The GATT and Environmental Protection: Problems of Construction’, Journal of Environmental Law 1592: 113–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wirth, David A. 1995. ‘The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development: Two Steps Forward, and One Back, or Vice Versa?’, Georgia Law Review 29: 599–652.Google Scholar

Woolcock, Stephen 1998. ‘European and North American Approaches to Regulation: Continued Divergence?’, in van Scherpenberg and Thiel (eds.), Towards Rival Regionalism?, pp. 257–76.

Youssef, Hesham 1999. ‘Special and Differential Treatment for Developing Countries in the WTO’, T.R.A.D.E. Working Papers No. 2, Southcentre, June.

Zeitler, Helge Elisabeth 2000. Einseitige Handelsbeschränkungen zum Schutz extraterritorialer Rechtsgüter (Baden Baden).Google Scholar

Zreczny, Alan Isaac 1994. ‘The Process/Product Distinction and the Tuna/Dolphin Controversy: Greening the GATT through International Agreement’, Buffalo Journal of International Law 1: 79–133.Google Scholar

,GATT 1995. Guide to GATT Law and Practice: Analytical Index: Vol. I, 6th edn, Geneva (GATT Analytical Index).

,GATT Secretariat 1971. Note ‘Industrial Pollution Control and International Trade’, L/3538, 9 June.

,GATT Secretariat 1992. Trade and the Environment, Study GATT/1529, 12 February.

,OECD 1994. Trade and Environment: Processes and Production Methods, 1994 (OECD).

,OECD 1997. Processes and Production Methods, 1997 (OECD).

World Commission on Environment and Development, Report 1987. Our Common Future, in General Assembly Resolution A/RES 42/187, 96th Plenary Meeting, 11 December (Brundtland Report).

,UNICEF 1997. The State of the World's Children 1997, Carol Bellamy (UNICEF).

,WTO 2007. Analytical Index, Guide to WTO Law and Practice, 2nd edn., available at www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/analytic_index_e/analytic_index_e.htm (WTO Analytical Index).

,WTO 2007b. Matrix on Trade Measures Pursuant to Selected Multilateral Environmental Agreements, Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/W/160/Rev.4, TN/TE/S/5/Rev.2, 14 March (WTO).

,WTO 2010. Understanding the WTO, 4th edn. (WTO).

,WTO Secretariat 2004. Trade and Environment: Background Document, April (WTO).