Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:13:55.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2022

Kelly McCormick
Kelly McCormick
Affiliation:
Texas Christian University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Problem of Blame
Making Sense of Moral Anger
 , pp. 211 - 220
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altemeyer, R. A. (1981). Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Manitoba: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, R. A. (1996). The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Andreasen, R. O. (2000). Race: Biological Reality or Social Construct? Philosophy of Science, 67, S653–S666.Google Scholar
Anscombe, E. (1963). Intention. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Appiah, K. A. (1995). The Uncompleted Argument: Du Bois and the Illusion of Race. In Bell, L. A. and Blumenfeld, D., eds., Overcoming Racism and Sexism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 59–78.Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. (1985). Errors and the Phenomenology of Value. In Carson, T. and Moser, P., eds., Morality and the Good Life. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 324–337.Google Scholar
Blair, R. (1995). A Cognitive Developmental Approach to Morality: Investigating the Psychopath. Cognition, 57(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Blair, R., Jones, Lawrence, Clark, Fiona, and Smith, Margaret. (1997). The Psychopathic Individual: A Lack of Responsiveness to Distress Cues? Psychophysiology, 34(2), 192–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brady, M. (2011). Emotions, Perceptions, and Reasons. In Bagnoli, C., ed., Morality and the Emotions. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 135–149.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1969) [1889]. The Origin of Our Knowledge of Right and Wrong. Kraus, O. and Chisholm, R., eds., R. Chisholm and E. Schneewind, trans. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Brink, D. (1986). Externalist Moral Realism. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 24(S1), 23–41.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. (1957). Of Selfhood and Godhood. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Caruso, G. (2012). Free Will and Consciousness: A Determinist Account of the Illusion of Free Will. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Caruso, G. (2015). Free Will Eliminativism: Reference, Error, and Phenomenology. Philosophical Studies, 172, 2823–2833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caruso, G. (2020). Free Will Skepticism and Its Implications: An Argument for Optimism. In Shaw, E., Pereboom, D., and Caruso, G., eds., Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society: Challenging Retributive Justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 43–72.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. M. (1981). Eliminative Materialism and Propositional Attitudes. Journal of Philosophy, 78, 67–90.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind/Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ciurria, M. (2019). An Intersectional Feminist Theory of Moral Responsibility. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coates, D. J., and Tognazzini, Neal. (2013). The Contours of Blame. In Coates, D. J. and Tognazzini, Neal, eds., Blame: Its Nature and Norms. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Cogley, Z. (2013). Basic Desert of Reactive Emotions. Philosophical Explorations, 16(2), 165–177.Google Scholar
D’Arms, J., and Jacobson, Daniel. (2000a). The Moralistic Fallacy: On the “Appropriateness” of Emotions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 61, 65–90.Google Scholar
D’Arms, J., and Jacobson, Daniel. (2000b). Sentiment and Value. Ethics, 110, 722–748.Google Scholar
D’Arms, J., and Jacobson, Daniel. (2003). The Significance of Recalcitrant Emotions (or, Anti-quasijudgmentalism). Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 52, 127–145.Google Scholar
Daw, R., and Alter, Torin. (2001). Free Acts and Robot Cats. Philosophical Studies, 102, 345–357.Google Scholar
Deery, O. (2021a). Free Actions as a Natural Kind. Synthese, 198(1), 823–843.Google Scholar
Deery, O. (2021b). Naturally Free Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deery, O., Bedke, Matt, and Nichols, Shaun. (2013). Phenomenal Abilities: Incompatibilism and the Experience of Agency. In Shoemaker, D., ed., Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 126–150.Google Scholar
De Sousa, R. (1987). The Rationality of Emotion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Donnellan, K. (1966). Reference and Definite Descriptions. Philosophical Review, 75, 281–304.Google Scholar
Donnellan, K. (1968). Putting Humpty Dumpty Together Again. Philosophical Review, 77(2), 203–215.Google Scholar
Döring, S. (2003). Explaining Action by Emotion. The Philosophical Quarterly, 53, 214–230.Google Scholar
Elgin, C. (1996). Considered Judgment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Elgin, C. (2008). Emotion and Understanding. In Brun, G., Doguoglu, U., and Kuenzle, D., eds., Epistemology and the Emotions. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 33–50.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. (1970). Doing and Deserving. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Feltz, A., and Cokely, Edward. (2008). The Fragmented Folk: More Evidence of Stable Individual Differences in Moral Judgments and Folk Intuitions. In Love, B. C., McRae, K., and Sloutskey, V. M., eds., Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1771–1776.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. (1962). Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism. In Feigel, H. and Maxwell, G., eds., Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time, vol. 3 of Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 28–97.Google Scholar
Foot, P. (1978). Hume on Moral Judgment. In Virtues and Vices. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 74–80.Google Scholar
Franklin, C. (2013). Valuing Blame. In Coates, D. J. and Tognazzini, N., eds., Blame: Its Nature and Norms. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 207–223.Google Scholar
Franklin, C. (2018). A Minimal Libertarianism: Free Will and the Promise of Reduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glover, J. (1970). Responsibility. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1955). Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, J. (2010). The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul. In Naddelhoffer, T., Nahmias, E., and Nichols, S., eds., Moral Psychology: Historical and Contemporary Readings. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 359–372.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. (1997). What Emotions Really Are. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haas, D. (2013). Merit, Fit, and Basic Desert. Philosophical Explorations, 16(2), 226–239.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2001). The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.Google Scholar
Haji, I. (1998). Moral Appraisability: Puzzles, Proposals, and Perplexities. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haji, I. (2016). Luck’s Mischief: Obligations and Blameworthiness on a Thread. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hare, R. (1952). The Language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1968). Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, M. (1996). The Mad Scientist Meets the Robot Cats: Compatibilism, Kinds, and Counterexamples. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 56(2), 333–337.Google Scholar
Hieronymi, P. (2004). The Force and Fairness of Blame. Philosophical Perspectives, 18, 115–148.Google Scholar
Hieronymi, P. (2005). The Wrong Kind of Reason. The Journal of Philosophy, 102, 437–457.Google Scholar
Hieronymi, P. (2020). Freedom, Resentment, and the Metaphysics of Morals. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, D. (2012). Rationality + Consciousness = Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurley, S. (2000). Is Responsibility Essentially Impossible? Philosophical Studies, 99(2), 229–268.Google Scholar
Jackson, F. and Pettit, Philip. (1995). Moral Functionalism and Moral Motivation. Philosophical Quarterly, 45, 20–40.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (2001). The Authority of Affect. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 53, 181–214.Google Scholar
Kane, R. (1985). Free Will and Values. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kane, R. (1996). The Significance of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kane, R. (2007). Libertarianism. In Fischer, J., Kane, R., Pereboom, D., and Vargas, M., eds., Four Views on Free Will. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 5–43.Google Scholar
Kane, R. (2011). Rethinking Free Will: New Perspectives on an Ancient Problem. In Kane, R., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 381–404.Google Scholar
Kane, R. (2017). Free Will Bound and Unbound: Reflections on Shaun Nichols’ Bound. Philosophical Studies, 174(10), 2479–2488.Google Scholar
Knobe, J., and Doris, John. (2010). Responsibility. In Doris, J. and The Moral Psychology Research Group, eds., The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 321–354.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Socialization. In Goslin, D. A., ed., Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, pp. 347–480.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, L. (1984). Science and Values. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lemos, J. (2016). Moral Concerns about Responsibility Denial and the Quarantine of Violent Criminals. Law and Philosophy, 35, 461–483.Google Scholar
Lemos, J. (2018). A Pragmatic Approach to Libertarian Free Will. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lerner, M. J. (1965). Evaluation of Performance as a Function of Performer’s Reward and Attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 355–360.Google Scholar
Lerner, M. (1980). The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, M., and Simmons, Carol. (1966). Observer’s Reaction to the “Innocent Victim”: Compassion or Rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Pyschology, 4, 203–210.Google Scholar
Levy, N. (2011). Hard Luck: How Luck Undermines Free Will & Moral Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1979). Counterfactual Dependence and Time’s Arrow. Noûs, 13, 455–476.Google Scholar
Lillehammer, H. (2007). Companions in Guilt: Arguments for Ethical Objectivity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Machery, E. (2009). Doing without Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. (1977). Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mallon, R. (2006). Race: Normative, Not Metaphysical or Semantic. Ethics, 116(3), 525–551.Google Scholar
McCormick, K. (2013). Anchoring a Revisionist Account of Moral Responsibility. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 7(3), 1–20.Google Scholar
McCormick, K. (2014). Holding Responsibility Hostage: Responsibility, Justification, and the Compatibility Question. Journal of Value Inquiry, 48(4), 623–641.Google Scholar
McCormick, K. (2015). Companions in Innocence: Defending a New Methodological Assumption for Theorizing about Moral Responsibility. Philosophical Studies, 172(2), 515–533.Google Scholar
McCormick, K. (2017a). Revisionism. In Levy, N., Griffith, M., and Timpe, K., eds., The Routledge Companion to Free Will. New York: Routledge, pp. 109–120.Google Scholar
McCormick, K. (2017b). Why We Should(n’t) Be Discretionists about Free Will. Philosophical Studies, 174(10), 2489–2498.Google Scholar
McGeer, V. (2013). Civilizing Blame. In Coates, D. J. and Tognazzini, N., eds., Blame: Its Nature and Norms. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 162–188.Google Scholar
McGeer, V. (2019). Scaffolding Agency: A Proleptic Account of the Reactive Attitudes. The European Journal of Philosophy, 27(2), 301–323.Google Scholar
McKay, T. (1968). Mr. Donnellan and Humpty Dumpty on Referring. Philosophical Review, 77(2), 197–202.Google Scholar
McKenna, M. (2009). Compatibilism and Desert: Critical Comments on Four Views on Free Will. Philosophical Studies, 144, 3–13.Google Scholar
McKenna, M. (2012). Conversation and Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, C. (2020). Emily Doe’s Victim Impact Statement. In Know My Name. New York: Penguin Books, pp. 337–361. [Originally published by Katie J. M. Baker in Buzzfeed News on June 3rd (2016), as Here’s the Powerful Letter the Stanford Victim Read to Her Attacker.]Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1903). Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1962). Proof of the External World. In Philosophical Papers. New York: Collier Books, pp. 127–150.Google Scholar
Nadelhoffer, T., Shepard, Jason, Nahmias, Eddy, Sripada, Chandra, and Ross, Lisa Thomas. (2014). The Free Will Inventory: Measuring Beliefs about Agency and Responsibility. Consciousness and Cognition, 25, 27–41.Google Scholar
Nadelhoffer, T., and Tocchetta, Daniela Goya. (2013). The Potential Dark Side of Believing in Free Will (and Related Concepts): Some Preliminary Findings. In Caruso, G., ed., Exploring the Illusion of Free Will and Moral Responsibility. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 121–140.Google Scholar
Nahmias, E., Justin Coates, D., and Kvaran, Trevor. (2007). Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Mechanism: Experiments on Folk Intuitions. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 31, 214–242.Google Scholar
Nahmias, E., Morris, Stephen, Nadelhoffer, Thomas, and Turner, Jason. (2006). Is Incompatibilism Intuitive? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 73(1), 28–53.Google Scholar
Nelkin, D. (2013). Desert, Fairness, and Resentment. Philosophical Explorations, 16(2), 1–16.Google Scholar
Nichols, S. (2002). How Psychopaths Threaten Moral Rationalism. Monist, 85, 285–303.Google Scholar
Nichols, S. (2004). Sentimental Rules: On the Natural Foundations of Moral Judgment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, S. (2013). Free Will and Error. In Caruso, G., ed., Exploring the Illusion of Free Will and Moral Responsibility. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 203–218.Google Scholar
Nichols, S. (2015). Bound. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, S. (2017). Replies to Kane, McCormick, and Vargas. Philosophical Studies, 174(10), 2511–2523.Google Scholar
Nichols, S. and Knobe, Joshua. (2007). Moral Responsibility and Determinism: The Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions. Noûs, 41(4), 663–685.Google Scholar
Nichols, S., Pinillos, Ángel, and Mallon, Ron. (2016). Ambiguous Reference. Mind, 125(497), 145–175.Google Scholar
Nolan, D. (1997). Impossible Worlds: A Modest Approach. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 38(4), 535–572.Google Scholar
O’Connor, T. (1995). Agent Causation. In O’Connor, T., ed., Agents, Causes and Events: Essays on Free Will and Indeterminism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 173–200.Google Scholar
Olson, J. (2004). Buck-Passing and the Wrong Kind of Reasons. The Philosophical Quarterly, 54, 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, D. (2001). Rationality and Reasons. In Egonsson, D., Jesefsson, J., Petersson, B., and Rønnow-Rasmussen, T., eds., Exploring Practical Philosophy. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp. 17–39.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. (1991). Measurement and Control of Response Bias. In Robinson, J., Shaver, P., and Wrightsman, L., eds., Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 17–59.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. and Carey, Jasmine. (2011). The FAD-Plus: Measuring Lay Beliefs Regarding Free Will and Related Constructs. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 96–104.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. (1995). Determinism al dente. Noûs, 29(1), 21–45.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. (2001). Living without Free Will. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. (2005). Defending Hard Incompatibilism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 29, 228–247.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. (2007a). Hard Incompatibilism. In Kane, R., Fischer, J. M., Pereboom, D., and Vargas, M., eds., Four Views on Free Will. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 85–125.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. (2007b). Response to Kane, Fischer, and Vargas. In Kane, R., Fischer, J. M., Pereboom, D., and Vargas, M., eds., Four Views on Free Will. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 191–203.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. (2009a). Free Will, Love, and Anger. Ideas y Valores, 141, 21–33.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. (2009b). Hard Incompatiblism and Its Rivals. Philosophical Studies, 144, 21–33.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. (2011). Free Will Skepticism and Meaning in Life. In Kane, R., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 407–424.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. (2013). Free Will Skepticism, Blame, and Obligation. In Coates, J. and Tognazzini, N., eds., Blame: Its Nature and Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 198–206.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. (2014). Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. (2020). Free Will Skepticism, General Deterrence, and the “Use” Objection. In Shaw, E., Pereboom, D., and Carus, G. D., eds., Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society: Challenging Retributive Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–115.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1965) [1932]. The Moral Judgment of the Child. Gabain, M., trans., New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. (2004). Gut Feelings. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1962). It Ain’t Necessarily So. Journal of Philosophy, 59, 658–671.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1975). The Meaning of “Meaning”. Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science, 7, 131–193.Google Scholar
Rabinowicz, W., and Rönnow-Rasmussen, Toni. (2004). The Strike of the Demon: On Fitting Pro Attitudes and Value. Ethics, 114, 391–423.Google Scholar
Rabinowicz, W., and Rönnow-Rasmussen, Toni. (2006). Buck-Passing and the Right Kind of Reasons. The Philosophical Quarterly, 56, 114–120.Google Scholar
Rakos, R., Laurene, Kimberly, Skala, Sarah, and Slane, Stephen. (2008). Belief in Free Will: Measurement and Conceptualization Innovations. Behavior and Social Issues, 17, 20–39.Google Scholar
Reisner, A. (2009). The Possibility of Pragmatic Reasons for Belief and the Wrong Kind of Reasons Problem. Philosophical Studies, 145, 257–272.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. (2003). Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roskies, A., and Malle, Bertram. (2013). A Strawsonian Look at Desert. Philosophical Explorations, 16(2), 133–152.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. (1988). The Significance of Choice. Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 8, 149–216.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. (2008). Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scheid, D. (1997). Constructing a Theory of Punishment, Desert, and Distribution of Punishments. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 10, 441–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlick, M. (1939). When Is a Man Responsible? D. Rynin, trans. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Sher, G. (2006). In Praise of Blame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sher, G. (2013). Wrongdoing and Relationships: The Problem of the Stranger. In Coates, D. J. and Tognazzini, N., eds., Blame: Its Nature and Norms. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 49–65.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, D. (2015). Responsibility from the Margins. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, D. (2017). Response-Dependent Responsibility. The Philosophical Review, 126, 481–527.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. (1961). Free-Will, Praise, and Blame. Mind, 70, 291–306.Google Scholar
Smetana, J. (1983). Social-cognitive Development: Domain Distinctions and Coordinations. Developmental Review, 3, 131–147.Google Scholar
Smilansky, S. (2011). Hard Determinism and Punishment: A Practical Reduction. Law and Philosophy, 30, 353–367.Google Scholar
Smilansky, S. (2016). Parfit on Free Will, Desert, and the Fairness of Punishment. Journal of Ethics, 20, 139–148.Google Scholar
Smilansky, S. (2017). Pereboom on Punishment: Funishment, Innocence, Motivation, and Other Difficulties. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 11, 591–603.Google Scholar
Smilansky, S. (2020). Free Will Denial and Deontological Contraints. In Shaw, E., Pereboom, D., and Caruso, G., Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society: Challenging Retributive Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 29–42.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2013). Moral Blame and Moral Protest. In Coates, D. J. and Tognazzini, N., eds., Blame: Its Nature and Norms. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–48.Google Scholar
Smith, M. (1994). The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stitch, S. (1983). From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, G. (1993). On Freedom and Resentment. In Fischer, J. M. and Ravizza, M., eds., Perspectives on Moral Responsibility. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 67–100.Google Scholar
Strawson, G. (1994). The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility. Philosophical Studies, 75, 5–24.Google Scholar
Strawson, G. (2002). The Bounds of Freedom. In Kane, R., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 441–460.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1962). Freedom and Resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy, 48, 1–25. [All pagination taken from reprint in Hieronymi, P. (2020). Freedom, Resentment, and the Metaphysics of Morals. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 107–133.]Google Scholar
Stroessner, S., and Green, Charles. (1990). Effects of Belief in Free Will or Determinism on Attitudes toward Punishment and Locus of Control. The Journal of Social Psychology, 130(6), 789–799.Google Scholar
Suikkanen, J. (2004). Reasons and Value – In Defense of the Buck-Passing Account. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 7, 513–535.Google Scholar
Tappolet, C. (2000). Emotions et Valuers. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. (1992). Metaphysics, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Turiel, E. (1983). The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turiel, E., Killen, Melanie, and Helwig, Charles C.. (1987). Morality: Its Structure, Functions, and Vagaries. In Kagan, J. and Lamb, S., eds., The Emergence of Morality in Young Children. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 155–245.Google Scholar
Turiel, E., and Smetana, Judith. (1984). Social Knowledge and Action: the Coordination of Domains. In Kurtines, W. and Gewitz, J., eds., Morality, Moral Behavior and Moral Development: Basic Issues in Theories and Research. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Unger, P. (1979). There are No Ordinary Things. Synthese, 41, 117–154.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, P. (1990). Material Beings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vargas, M. (2005). The Revisionist’s Guide to Responsibility. Philosophical Studies, 125, 399–429.Google Scholar
Vargas, M. (2009). Revisionism about Free Will: A Statement and Defense. Philosophical Studies, 144, 45–62.Google Scholar
Vargas, M. (2011). Revisionist Accounts of Free Will: Origins, Varieties, and Challenges. In Kane, R., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 457–474.Google Scholar
Vargas, M. (2013). Building Better Beings: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vargas, M. (2017). Contested Terms and Philosophical Debates. Philosophical Studies, 174(10), 2499–2510.Google Scholar
Viney, W., McIntyre, Robert, and Viney, Donald. (1984). Validity of a Scale Designed to Measure Beliefs in Free Will and Determinism. Psychological Reports, 54, 867–872.Google Scholar
Walker, M. (2006). Moral Repair: Reconstructing Moral Relations after Wrongdoing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. J. (1994). Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. J. (2011). Dispassionate Opprobrium: On Blame and the Reactive Sentiments. In Wallace, R. J., Kumar, R., and Freeman, S., eds., Reasons and Recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T.M. Scanlon. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 348–372.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. J. (2019). The Moral Nexus. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Waller, B. (1990). Freedom without Responsibility. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Waller, B. (2011). Against Moral Responsibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Waller, B. (2013). The Stubborn Illusion of Moral Responsibility. In Caruso, G., ed., Exploring the Illusion of Free Will and Moral Responsibility. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 65–86.Google Scholar
Waller, B. (2015). The Stubborn System of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Waller, B. (2020). Beyond the Retributive System. In Shaw, E., Pereboom, D., and Caruso, G., eds., Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society: Challenging Retributive Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–95.Google Scholar
Warmke, B. (2011). Moral Responsibility and Invariantism. Philosophia, 39(1), 179–200.Google Scholar
Watson, G. (2004). Agency and Answerability. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Weigel, C. (2013). Experimental Evidence for Free Will Revisionism. Philosophical Explorations, 16, 31–43.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1981). Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (2007). The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolf, S. (2011). Blame, Italian Style. In Wallace, R. J., Kumar, R., and Freeman, S., eds., Reasons and Recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T.M. Scanlon. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 332–347.Google Scholar
Yap, A. (2017). Credibility Excess and the Social Imaginary in Cases of Sexual Assault. Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, 3(4), 1–24.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, L. (2004). Constraining and Condemning. Ethics, 108, 489–501.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. J. (1988). An Essay on Moral Responsibility. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Kelly McCormick, Texas Christian University
  • Book: The Problem of Blame
  • Online publication: 21 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108907071.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Kelly McCormick, Texas Christian University
  • Book: The Problem of Blame
  • Online publication: 21 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108907071.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Kelly McCormick, Texas Christian University
  • Book: The Problem of Blame
  • Online publication: 21 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108907071.011
Available formats
×