Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:45:55.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2009

Justin E. H. Smith
Affiliation:
Concordia University, Montréal
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberti, Michael. 1708. De paedantismo medico. (No further references available.)
Alberti, Michael. 1718. Introductio in universam medicinam… . Halae: Litteris et impensis Orphanotrophei.Google Scholar
Alberti, Michael. 1721. Medicinische und philosophische Schriften… . Halle: J. C. Hendel.Google Scholar
Alberti, Michael. 1726. Specimen medicinae theologicae… . Halae: Hendel.Google Scholar
Aldrovandus, Ulysses. 1642. Monstrorum historia. Bononiae: Marcus Antonius Bernia.Google Scholar
Aldrovandus, Ulysses. 1634. Ornithologiae. Vol. II. Bononiae. Nicolaum Tebaldinum.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1967. Summa Theologiae. Vol. 10, Cosmogony. Trans. William, A. Wallace, O.P. New York: Blackfriars and McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Arantius, C. 1579. De humano foetu libellus. Basileae: Laurentius Scholzius.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1963. On the Generation of Animals. Trans. Peck, L. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Cited as GA.)Google Scholar
Aristotle. Historia Animalium. Vol. I (1965), trans. Peck, A. L; vol. II (1970), trans. Peck, A. L.; Vol. III (1991), trans. Balme, D. M. and prepared by Allan, Gotthelf. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Cited as HA.)Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1992. De partibus animalium I and De generatione animalium I (with passages from II. 1–3). Ed. Balme, D. M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Avicenna, . 1959. Avicenna's De Anima, being the psychological part of Kitab al-Shifa. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baer, Karl Ernst. 1827. De ovi mammalium et hominis genesi. Translated as Within the Ovum by Malley, C. D.. Isis 48 (1956): 148.Google Scholar
Basson, Sébastien. 1621. Philosophiae naturalis adversus Aristotelem libri Ⅻ. Geneva: Pierre de la Rouiere.Google Scholar
Bauhin, Casper. 1614. De hermaphroditorum monstrosorumque partuum natura et theologia, jurisconsultorum, medicorum, philosophorum et rabbinorum sententia libri II. Basel.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre. 1982. Oeuvres diverses. Ed. Elisabeth, Labrousse. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Benito, P. 1591. De communibus omnium rerum naturalium principiis. Venice.Google Scholar
Blumenbach, Johann Friedrich. 1792. Üeber den Bildungtrieb und das Zeugungsgechäfte. Göttingen. Translated as An Essay on Generation by Crichton, A.. London.Google Scholar
Boaistuau, Pierre. 1561. Histoires prodigieuses. Paris.Google Scholar
Bonnet, Charles. 1779–1783. Oeuvres d'histoire naturelle et de philosophie. 18 vols. Neufchâtel: Samuel Fauche.Google Scholar
Bonnet, Charles. 1985. Considérations sur les corps organisés. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Bourguet, Louis. 1729. Lettres philosophiques sur la formation des sels et des crystaux et sur la génération et le méchanisme organique des plantes et des animaux. Amsterdam: François L'Honoré.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert. 1991. Origins of Forms and Qualities. In Selected Philosophical Papers of Robert Boyle. Stewart, M. A.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert. 1772. Works. 6 vols. Ed. Birch, T.. London.Google Scholar
Buffon, Georges-Louis Leclerc. 1749. Histoire naturelle. Paris.Google Scholar
Buffon, Georges-Louis Leclerc. 1749 [1780]. Natural History. Trans. William Smellie. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Buffon, Georges-Louis Leclerc. 1791. Natural History, General and Particular. 3rd English edition. 9 vols. Trans. William Smellie. London: Strahan and Cadell.Google Scholar
Burgmann, Peter Christoph. 1731. Succinctum hypotheseos stahlianae examen de anima rationali corpus humanum struente motusque vitales tam in statu sano quam morboso administrante. Lipsiae: Apud I. F. Gleditschii B. filium.Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter. 1652. The Darknes of Atheism Expelled by the Light of Reason. London: William Lee.Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter. 1654. Physiologia Epicuro-Gassendo-Charletoniana: A Fabrick of Science Natural Upon the Hypothesis of Atoms. London: Thomas Heath.Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter. 1659. Natural History of Nutrition, Life, and Voluntary Motion. London: Henry Herringman.Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter. 1659. Oeconomia animalis, novis in medicina hypothesibus superstructa & mechanicè explicata. London: Daniel & Redmann.Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter. 1659. The Immortality of the Human Soul, Demonstrated by the Light of Nature. London: Henry Herringman.Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter. 1666. Dissertatio epistolica, de ortu animae humanae. In Walter Charleton, Oeconomia animalis, novis in medicina hypothesibus superstructa & mechanicè explicata. 3rd ed. London: Roger Daniel.Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter. 1674. Natural History of the Passions. London: James Magnes.Google Scholar
Coimbra [Collegium Conimbricensis], . 1594 [1984]. Commentarii … in octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis Stagiritae. Lugduni: Ioannes Baptista Buysson. Repr., Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Coiter, Volcher. 1572. De ovis et pullis gallinaceis. In Externarum et internarum principialium humani corporis partium tabulae. Noribergae: Theodorici Gerlatzeni.
Coiter, Volcher. 1572. Externarum et internarum principialium humani corporis partium tabulae. Noribergae: Theodorici Gerlatzeni.
Coiter, Volcher. 1933. De ovorum gallinaceorum generationis. Ed. Adelmann, B.. Annals of Medical History 5: 444–57.Google Scholar
Columbus, Realdus. 1559. De re anatomica. Venice: Bevilacqua.Google Scholar
Condillac, Etienne de . 1754. Traité des sensations. Paris.Google Scholar
Conway, Anne. 1982. The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Edited and with an introduction by Peter, Loptson. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Conway, Anne. 1996. The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Ed. Allison, P. Coudert and Taylor, Corse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coschwitz, Georg Daniel. 1725. Organismus et mechanismus in homine vivo. Lipsiae: F. Lankisius.Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph. 1678 [1845]. The True Intellectual System of the Universe. 3 vols. London: Tegg.Google Scholar
Cureau, Chambre Marin. 1647 [1989]. Traité de la connoissance des animaux, où tout ce qui a esté dit Pour, & Contre le raisonnement des bestes est examiné. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Cuvier, Georges. 1813 [1822]. Theory of the Earth. 4th ed. Trans. and ed. Robert, Jameson. Edinburgh: William Blackwood.Google Scholar
Cuvier, Georges. 1817. Le règne animal distribué d'aprés son organisation, pour servir de base à l'histoire naturelle des animaux et d'introduction à l'anatomie comparée. Paris.Google Scholar
D'Alembert, Jean. 1754. Cosmologie. In Encyclopédie, ou Dictionnaire raisonée des sciences, des arts et des métiers. Vol. 4. Ed. Diderot, Denis and Jean D'Alembert, . Paris.Google Scholar
D'Alembert, Jean. 1995. Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopedia. Trans. Schwab, Richard. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Daniel, Gabriel. 1702. Voyage du monde de Descartes. 2nd ed. Paris: V. Pepie.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1859. On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Descartes, René . 1964–76. Oeuvres de Descartes. 11 vols. Ed. Adam, C. and Tannery, P.. Paris: J. Vrin. (Cited as AT, followed by volume and page number.)Google Scholar
Descartes, René . 1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vol. 3. The Correspondence. Trans. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, Dugald Murdoch, and Anthony Kenny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Cited as CSMK, followed by volume and page number.)Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1996. Le monde, l'homme. Ed. Bitbol-Hespériès, Annie and Jean-Pierre, Verdet. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 2000. Ecrits physiologiques et médicaux. Ed. Vincent, Aucante. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Diderot, Denis. 1875–7. Oeuvres completes. Ed. Assezat, J.. 20 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Diderot, Denis. 1964. Le Rève de D'Alembert. In Oeuvres philosophiques de Diderot. Ed. Vernière, Paul. Paris: Editions Garnier.Google Scholar
Diderot, Denis. 1981. Pensées sur l'interprétation de la nature. In Oeuvres complètes. Vol. 9. Ed. Jean Verloot. Paris: Hermann.
Diderot, Denis. 1976. Spinosiste. In Encyclopédie. Repr. in Diderot, Oeuvres philo-sophiques, vol. 8, ed. Lough, John and Jacques, Proust, 328–9.
Digby, Sir Kenelm. 1644. Two Treatises. Paris: Blaizot.Google Scholar
Euler, Leonhard. 1957. Commentationes mechanicae. In Opera omnia, II 5. Lausanne: Auctoritate et impensis Societatis scientiarum naturalium helveticae.Google Scholar
Euler, Leonhard. 1983. Leonhard Euler 1707–1783: Beiträge zu Leben und Werk. Gedenkband des Kantons Basel-Stadt. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Fabricius d'Acquapendente, Hieronymus. 1604. De formato fœtu. Venice.Google Scholar
Fabricius d'Acquapendente, Hieronymus. 1621. De formatione ovi et pulli. Patavii: Aloysii Bencii Bibliopolae.Google Scholar
Fernel, J. 1655. Physiologie. Paris: Jean Guignard le Jeune.Google Scholar
Feyens, Thomas. 1620. De formatrice fœtus liber. Antwerp: Willem van Tongheren.Google Scholar
Feyens, Thomas. 1635. De viribus imaginationis tractatus. Lugduni Batavorum: Elzevirus.Google Scholar
Galen, . 1625. Opera. Venetiis: Juntas.Google Scholar
Galen, . 1854–6. Oeuvres anatomiques, physiologiques, et médicales de Galien. Trans. Daremberg, Charles. 2 vols. Paris: Baillière.Google Scholar
Galen, . 1963. Galen on the Natural Faculties. Trans. Arthur John, Brock. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Galen. 1985. Three Treatises on the Nature of Science. Ed. Michael, Frede. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Galen. 1992. On Semen. Ed. and trans. Phillip, Lacy. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre. 1649 [1993]. Syntagma Philosophiae Epicuri. Trans. Paul Westholm Johnson. In A Syntagma of the Philosophy of Epicurus of Pierre Gassendi. Ph.D. diss., University of Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre. 1651. Viri illustris Nicolai Claudii Fabricii de Peiresc vita. Hagae Comitis: Sumptibus A. Vlacq.Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre. 1658 [1964]. Opera omnia. 6 vols. Lyon. Repr., Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt: Friedrich Frommann. (Cited as O).Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre. 1675. Animadversiones in Decimum Librum Diogenis Laertii, qvi est de vita, moribus, placitisque Epicuri. 3rd ed. Lyon: Barbier.Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre. 1966. De generatione animalium. Trans. Howard B. Adelmann. In Adelmann, Marcello Malpighi and the Evolution of Embryology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre. 1972. Selected Works. Trans. and Ed. C. B. Brush. New York: Johnson Reprints.Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre. 2003. Pierre Gassendi (1592–1655): Lettres latines. Trans. Sylvie Taussig. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Gesner, Conrad. 1552. Conradi Gesneri historia animalium. Tigure: Apud Christ. Froschoverum.Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph. 1665 [1978]. Scepsis Scientifica: or, Confest Ignorance, the Way to Science: in an Essay on the Vanity of Dogmatizing and Confident Opinion. London. Repr., New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Glisson, Francis. 1641 [1993]. English Manuscripts of Francis Glisson. Ed. Andrew, Cunningham. Cambridge: Cambridge Wellcome Unit.Google Scholar
Goetz, Johan Christoph. 1729. Scripta D. Georgii Ernesti Stahlii. 2nd ed. Norimbergae: Impensis B. W. M. Endteri filiae Mayerin.Google Scholar
Haller, Albrecht . 1739–44. Editor. Praelectiones academicae in proprias institutiones rei medicae. Authored by Herman Boerhaave. Notes added by Albrecht von Haller. 6 vols. Göttingen: A. Vandenhoeck.Google Scholar
Haller, Albrecht . 1747. Primae lineae physiologiae in usum praelectionum academicarum. Göttingen: A. Vandenhoeck.Google Scholar
Haller, Albrecht . 1750 [1981]. Preface to Allgemeine Historie der Natur, vol. 1. Hamburg and Leipzig: G. C. Grund and A. H. Holle. Reprinted in Shirley A. Roe, The Natural History of Albrecht von Haller. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Haller, Albrecht . 1751 [1981]. Réflexions sur le systême de la génération de M. de Buffon. Geneva: Barrillot Reprinted in Shirley A. Roe, The Natural History of Albrecht von Haller. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Haller, Albrecht . 1752 [1936]. A Dissertation on the Sensible and Irritable Parts of Animals. Introduced by Owsei Temkin. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 4: 651–99.Google Scholar
Haller, Albrecht . 1752 [1981]. Preface to Allgemeine Historie der Natur, vol. 2. Louis. Bibliothèque Raisonnée 45: 68–88. Reprinted in Shirley A. Roe, The Natural History of Albrecht von Haller. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Haller, Albrecht . 1757–66. Elementa physiologiae corporis humani. 8 vols. Lausanne: M. M. Bousquet, S. d'Arnay, F. Grasset. (Cited as EP, followed by volume and page number.)Google Scholar
Haller, Albrecht . 1757–65. Elementa physiologiae corporis humani. 8 vols. Lausannae: Sumptibus M. M. Bousquet & Sociorum; Bern: Sumptibus Societatis Typographiae.Google Scholar
Haller, Albrecht . 1758. Sur la formation du coeur dans le poulet; sur l'oeil, sur la structure du jaune. 2 vols. Lausanne: M. M. Bousquet.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haller, Albrecht . 1760. “Review of Theoria generationis, by Caspar Friedrich Wolff.” Göttingische Anzeigen von gelehrten Sachen, 1226–31.Google Scholar
Haller, Albrecht . 1777. “Oeconomie animale.” In Supplément à l'Encyclopédie, vol. 4. Amsterdam: M. M. Rey.Google Scholar
Haller, Albrecht von. 2000. Commentarius de formatione cordis in ovo incubato. Ed. M. T. Monti, . Basel: Schwabe & Co.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Georg Volcmar. 1733. Epistola de bruto ex homine, ad virum illustrem, excellentissimum, consultissimum, amplissimum et experietissimum dominum D. Georgium Ernestum Stahlium… . Erfordiae: Sumptibus C. F. Jungnicolii.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Georg Volcmar. 1735. Schediasma apologeticum quo sententia illustris Stahlii de natura humana in epistola de bruto ex nomine defensaita confirmatur… . Erfordiae: Sumptibus C. F. Jugnicolii.Google Scholar
Harvey, William. 1628. Exercitatio anatomica de motu cordis et sanguinis in animalibus. Francofurti: Sumptibus Guilelmi, Fitzer.Google Scholar
Harvey, William. 1651 [1981]. Disputations Touching the Generation of Animals. Translated and introduced by Gweneth Whitteridge. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Harvey, William. 1651. Exercitationes de generatione animalium. Quibus accedunt quaedam de partu: de membranis ac humoribus uteri: & de conceptione. London: Octavianus Pulleyn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, William. 1847. On the Generation of Animals. In The Works of William Harvey. London: Sydenham Society.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1817 [1970]. Philosophy of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heister, Lorenz. 1738 [1743]. De medicina mechanica praestantia prae stahliana. In Compendium medicinae practicae. Amstelaedami: Apud Janssonio-Waesbergios.Google Scholar
Heliodorus, . 1605. An Æthiopian historie: fyrst written in Greeke by Heliodorus, and translated into English, by T. V. No lesse witty then pleasant: being newly corrected and augmented, with diuers new additions by the same author. London: William Cotton.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried von. 1910. Gesammelte Schriften. Ed. Akademie, Wissenschaften. Berlin: Reimer. Later Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried von. 1989. Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit Ed. Martin Bollacher, . Frankfurt: Verlag Deutscher Klassiker.Google Scholar
Hertwig, Oscar. 1894 [1977]. The Biological Problem of To-day: Preformation or Epigenesis? The Basis of a Theory of Organic Development. Translated by P. Chalmers Mitchell and introduced by Joseph Anthony Mazzeo. Oceanside, NJ: Dabor Science Publications.Google Scholar
Highmore, Nathaniel. 1651. History of Generation. London: John Martin.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Friedrich. 1739 [1749]. Commentarius de differentia inter ejus doctrinam medico-mechanicum, et Georgii Ernesti Stahlii medico-organicam. In Hoffmann, FriedrichOperum omnium physico-medicorum supplementum, vol. 1. Genevae: Apud Fratres de Tournes. Italian translation by F. P. de Ceglia in Stahl e Hoffmann (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Holbach, Paul-Henri Dietrich. d'. 1868. System of Nature, or Laws of the Physical and Moral World. Trans. H. D. Robinson. New York: Burt Franklin.Google Scholar
Hooke, Robert. 1665. Micrographia; or, some Physiological Descriptions of Minute Bodies made by Magnifying Glasses. London: Martyn & Allestry.Google Scholar
Houel, Jean. 1782. Voyage pittoresque des isles de la Sicile, de Malte, et de Lipari. Paris.Google Scholar
Jazzar, Ibn al-. 1997. Ibn al-Jazzar on Sexual Diseases and Their Treatment: A Critical Edition of Zad al-musafir wa-qut al hadir. Ed. and Trans. Gerrit Bos. London: Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1790 [1928]. The Critique of Teleological Judgement. Trans. J. C. Meredith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1790 [1928]. Von den verschiedenen Racen der Menschen [AA 2:427–44]. Translated as The Critique of Teleological Judgement by J. C. Meredith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1965. Kritik der reinen Vernunft [A version (1781), AA 4:1–252; B version (1787), AA 3:1–552]. Translated as Critique of Pure Reason by Norman Kemp Smith. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1968. Gesammelte Schriften, Herausgegeben von der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: de Gruyter. (= Akademie Ausgabe; cited as AA, followed by volume and page number.)Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1987. Critique of Judgement. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1987. Kritik der Urteilskraft [AA 5:165–486]. Translated as Critique of Judgment by Werner Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1992. Der einzig mögliche Beweisgrund zu einer Demonstration des Daseins Gottes. Translated as The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God in Kant, , Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770, trans. and ed. David Walford and Ralf Meerbote. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1992. Träume eines Geistersehers [AA 2:315–84]. Translated as Dreams of a Spirit-Seer in Kant, Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770, trans. and ed. David Walford and Ralf Meevebote. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 1993. Opus Postumum. Ed. Eckart Förster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1996. Critique of Pure Reason Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
La, Forge, , Louis. 1664. Remarques sur le Traité de l'Homme. Paris: Michel Bobin, Nicolas Le Gras.Google Scholar
Laurens, André du. 1600. Historia anatomica. Frankfurt. L'histoire anatomique. French translation by F. Sizé. Paris, J. Bertault, 1610.Google Scholar
Le, Grand Antoine. 1694. An Entire Body of Philosophy according to the Principles of Renate Des Cartes. London: Roycroft.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1765. Opera omnia. 6 vols. Ed. Ludovici, Dutens. Geneva: Apud Fratres De Tournes.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1880. Die philosophischen Schriften von G. W. Leibniz. Ed. Gerhardt, C. I.. Berlin: Weidmann.
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1923–96. Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. (Citations give series, volume, and page, e.g., A VI ii 229.)
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1954. Principes de la nature et de la grâce fondés en raison. Principes de la philosophie ou Monadologie. Ed. Robinet, André. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1969 [1976]. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Philosophical Papers and Letters. Ed. and trans. Leroy, E. Loemker. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1977. Mathematische Schriften. 7 vols. Ed. Gerhardt, C. I.. Hildesheim: G. Olms. (Cited as GM.)Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1988. Opuscules et fragments inédits de Leibniz. Ed. Louis Couturat, . Hildesheim: Olms. (Cited as C.)Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1992. G. W. Leibniz. De Summa Rerum: Metaphysical Papers 1675–1676. Ed. and trans. Parkinson, G. H. R.. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried. 1996. New Essays on Human Understanding, Trans. and ed. Peter, Remnant and Jonathan, Bennett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1998. G. W. Leibniz: Philosophical Texts. Ed. and trans. Woolhouse, R. S. and Richard, Francks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, and Samuel Clarke. 2000. Correspondence. Ed. Ariew, Roger. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Liceti, Fortunio. 1616. De monstrorum causis, natura et differentiis. Padua.
Lindeboom, G. A., ed. 1975. The Letters of Jan Swammerdam to Melchisedek Thévenot. Amsterdam: Swets Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, Carl. 1735. Systema Naturae. Leyden.
Longolius, Johann Daniel. 1732. Systema stahlianum de vita et morte corporis humani ab incongruis medicorum mechanizantium opprobriis vindicatum… . Budissae: Literis Richterianis.
Lucretius, Titus Carus. 1992. De rerum natura. Trans. W. H. D. Rouse and Martin Fergueson Smith. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lycosthenes, Conrad. 1557. Prodigiorum ac ostentorum chronicon. Basileae: Per Henricum Petri.Google Scholar
Maignan, Emmanuel. 1673. Philosophia naturae. In Maignan, Cursus philosophicus. 2nd ed. Lyon: Gregoire.Google Scholar
Maillet, Bernard. 1968. Telliamed. Trans. Albert V. Carozzi. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas. 1958–66. Oeuvres complètes de Malebranche. 21 vols. Series director Henri Gouhier. Various editors. Paris: J. Vrin. (Cited as OCM, followed by volume and page number.)Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas. 1997. Dialogues on Metaphysics and on Religion. Ed. Nicholas Jolley, trans. David Scott. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Cited as DMR, followed by dialogue section and page number.)Google Scholar
Malpighi, Marcello. 1672 [1966]. On the Formation of the Chick. Trans. Howard B. Adelmann. In Adelmann, Marcello Malpighi and the Evolution of Embryology, vol. 2. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Malpighi, Marcello. 1683. Dissertatio epistolica de formatione pulli in ovo. Londinii: J. Martin. Published in Malpighi, Marcello, Opere scelte, ed. L. Belloni. Torino: Utet, 1967.Google Scholar
Maupertuis, Pierre-Louis Moreau . 1751. Essai de cosmologie. Leyden.
Maupertuis, Pierre-Louis Moreau de. 1980. Vénus physique suivi de la Lettre sur le progrès des sciences. Ed. Patrick, Tort. Paris: Aubier Montaigne.Google Scholar
Maupertuis, Pierre-Louis Moreau de. 1984. Essai de cosmologie. In Maupertuis, Essai de cosmologie: Système de la Nature: Réponse aux Objections de M. Diderot, ed. François, Azouvi. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Mauriceau, François. 1668. Des maladies des femmes grosses et accouchées. Paris.Google Scholar
Monro, Alexander. 1785. The Structure and Physiology of Fishes Explained and Compared with Those of Man and Other Animals. Edinburgh.
Montaigne, Michel de. 1992. Les Essais. Paris: Arléa.Google Scholar
More, Henry. 1662 [1978]. A Collection of Several Philosophical Writings. London: James Flesher. Repr. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Münster, Sebastian. 1552. Cosmographia universalis.
Nagy, Borosnyai Martin. 1729. De potentia et impotentia animae humanae in corpus organicum… . Halae: Typis I. C. Hilligeri.Google Scholar
Nenter, Georg Philipp. 1714. Theoria hominis sani sive physiologia medica. Argentorati: Typis et sumt. J. Beckii.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. 1704. Opticks. London: Sam. Smith and Benj. Walford.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. 1999. Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Trans. and ed. Bernard, I. Cohen and Anne, Whitman. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Oldenburg, Henry. 1967. The Correspondence of Henry Oldenburg. Ed. Hall, A. R. and Hall, M. B.. London.Google Scholar
Paley, William. 1802 [1819]. Natural Theology. Vol. 4 of the Collected Works. London: Rivington.Google Scholar
Paracelsus, (Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim). 1537 [1975]. De natura rerum. Bk. 9. In Sämtliche Werke. 4 vols. Leipzig: Zentralantiquariat der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik.Google Scholar
Paracelsus. 1951. Selected Writings. Ed. Jolande, Jacobi. New York: Bollingen Foundation.Google Scholar
Pardies, Ignace-Gaston. 1672 [1972]. Discours de la connoissance des bestes. Paris: Sebastien Mabre-Cramoisy. Repr. with introduction by Lenora Cohen Rosenfield, New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation.Google Scholar
Paré, Ambroise. 1840/1 [1970]. Oeuvres complètes. Paris. Repr., Geneva: Slatkine.Google Scholar
Paré, Ambroise. 1982. On Monsters and Marvels. Trans. Janis L. Pallister Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise. 1966. Pensées. Ed. A. J, Kraisheimer. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Plempius, V. F. 1638. Fundamentes medicinae. Louvain: Jacobi Zegresii.Google Scholar
Pliny the Elder (Caius, Plinius). 1956–63. Historia naturalis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Régis, Pierre-Sylvain. 1654. Philosophia naturalis. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Apud Ludovicum Elzevirium.Google Scholar
Régis, Pierre-Sylvain. 1691 [1970]. Cours entier de philosophie ou Système général selon les principes de Descartes. Lyon. Repr., New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation.Google Scholar
Reimarus, H. S. 1766. The Principle Truths of Natural Religion. Trans. R. Wynne. London.Google Scholar
Richter, Christian Friedrich. 1710. Die Höchst-Nöthige Erkenntnis des Menschen: Zum Drittenmal vermehret und verbessert heraus gegeben. Leipzig: J. F. Gleditsch und Sohn.Google Scholar
Riolan, Jean. 1625. Schola anatomica. Geneva: Joannis Celerii.Google Scholar
Riolan, Jean. 1629. Anthropographie. Paris: Denys Moreau.Google Scholar
Riolan, Jean. 1649. Opuscula anatomica. London: Milonis Flesher.Google Scholar
Rohault, Jacques. 1723 [1969]. A System of Natural Philosophy. Illustrated with Dr Samuel Clarke's Notes. London: Knapton. Repr., New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation.Google Scholar
Rorario, Girolamo. 1648. Ed. Naudé Gabriel, Quod animalia bruta ratione utantur melius homine.
Rüff, Jakob. 1637. De conceptu et generatione hominis. London: E. Griffin.Google Scholar
Sacco, N. 1628. De calore naturali. Papiae: J. Rubeum Baptistam.Google Scholar
Scaliger, Julius Caesar. 1557. Exotericarum exercitationum liber… . Lutetiae: Ex officina M. Vascosani.Google Scholar
Scaliger, Julius Caesar. 1619. Aristotelis historia de animalibus. Iulio Caesare Scaligero interprete… . Tolosae: Typis R. Colomerij.Google Scholar
Schacher, Polycarp Gottlieb. 1715. De anima rationali, an sit corporis vitali principio. Lipsiae: Fleischer.Google Scholar
Schenk, Johann Georg. 1609. Monstrorum historia memorabilis.
Sennert, Daniel. 1619. De chymicorum cum Aristotelicis et Galenicis consensu ac dissensu. Witterberg: Zachariah Schurer.Google Scholar
Sennert, Daniel. 1651. Hypomnemata physica. Venice: Francis Baba.Google Scholar
Sennert, Daniel. 1659. Thirteen Books of Natural Philosophy. Trans. Nicholas Culpeper. London: Abdiah Cole. Online photo reproduction at http://dewey.library.upenn.edu/sceti/printedbooksNew/index.cfm.Google Scholar
Sennert, Daniel. 1676. Opera omnia. Lyon.Google Scholar
Sennert, Daniel. 1683. Hypomnemata physica. Francofurti: Schleichus.Google Scholar
Sigorgne, Pierre. 1768. Institutions leibnitiennes ou Précis de la monadologie. Lyon: Frères Périsse.Google Scholar
Solinus, . 1538. De rerum toto orbe. Basilae: Michaelem Insignum, Henricum Petri.Google Scholar
Spallanzani, Lazzaro. 1769. Nouvelles recherches sur les découvertes microscopiques et la génération des corps organisés…. Avec des notes … par M. de Needham. London and Paris: Lacombe.Google Scholar
Sperling, Johann. 1641. Tractatus physicus de formatione foetus in utero. Vitembergae: Apud haeredes T. Meni.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. 1701. De differentia rationis et ratiocinationis. Halae: Litteris C. Henckelii.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. 1705. De frequentia morborum in homine prae brutis. Halae: Litteris C. Henckelii.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. 1706. De haereditaria dispositione ad varios affectus. Halae: Litteris C. Henckelii.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. 1708. Theoria medica vera, physiologiam et pathologiam, tanquam doctrinae medicae partes vere contemplativas, e naturae et artis veris fundamentis intaminata ratione et inconcussa experientia sistens. Halae Magdeburgicae: Impensis Orphanotrophei. Quotations are from the second edition (1737), ed. Johann Juncker. Halae Magdeburgicae: Impensis Orphanotrophei. Third and last Latin edition (1831–35), ed. Ludwig, Choulant, 2 vols. Lipsiae: Sumptibus Vossii. Partial German translation by Wendelin, Ruf (1802), Stahl's Theorie der Heilkunde, mit einer Vorrede v. Kurt Sprengel. Halle: Gebauer. Another partial German translation by Karl, Wilhelm Ideler (1831), Georg Ernst Stahls Theorie der Heilkunde. Berlin: Enslin. French translation in Georg, Ernst Stahl, 1859–64, vols. 1–7.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. 1708. De abortu et foetu mortuo… . Halae Magdeburgicae: Literis C. Henckelii.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst. 1859–64. Oeuvres médico-philosophiques de G. E. Stahl. 6 vols. French translation by Théodose Blondin. Paris: Baillière.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg ErnstGottfried, Wilhelm Leibniz. 1720. Negotium otiosum seu Skiamachia adversus positiones fundamentales Theoriae medicae verae a viro quodam celeberrimo intentata, sed armis conversis enervata. Halae: Litteris Orphanotrophei. French translation in Georg, Ernst Stahl, 1859–64, 6: 2–362. Partial English translation in L. J. Rather and J. B. Frerichs, “The Leibniz-Stahl controversy,” pts. 1 and 2, Clio Medica 3: 21–40; 5: 53–67.Google Scholar
Stenzel, Christian Gottfried. 1729. Bini tractatus… . Vitembergae: Stanno B. Gaeberdti.Google Scholar
Storch, Johann. 1752. Leitung zur Historie des Höchsten Gottes… . Eisenach.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco. 1965. Disputationes metaphysicae. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Themistius. 1899. In libros De anima paraphrasis. Ed. Heinze, R.. Berolini: G. Reimerum.Google Scholar
Tissot, Joseph. 1861. La vie dans l'homme. 2 vols. Paris: Victor Masson et Fils.Google Scholar
Trembley, Abraham. 1744. Mémoires pour servir à l'histoire d'un genre de polypes d'eau douce, en bras en forme de cornes. Leiden: Jean & Herman Verbeek.Google Scholar
Tyson, Edward. 1699. Orang-outang, sive Homo sylvestris; Or the Anatomy of a Pygmie compared with That of a Monkey, an Ape, and a Man. London.Google Scholar
Vasse, L. 1544. Tabulae anatomicae. Venetiae: Vincentium Vaugris.Google Scholar
Vesalius, , Andreas. 1543. De humani corpris fabrica. Basel.
Weinrich, Martin. 1595. De ortu monstrorum commentarius. SumptibusM. Osthesii.
Weisbach, Christian. 1712. Wahrhaffte und gründliche Cur aller dem menschlichen Leibe zustossenden Kranckheiten… . Strassburg: Dulsecker.Google Scholar
Willis, Thomas. 1672. De anima brutorum, quae hominis vitalis ac sensitiva est, exercitationes duae. Oxford: Richard Davis.Google Scholar
Wolff, Caspar Friedrich. 1759 [1966]. Theoria generationis. Halle. Reprinted in Theorie von der Generation in zwei Abhandlungen erklärt und bewiesen. Introduced by Robert Herrlinger. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Wolff, Caspar Friedrich. 1759–77. Letters to Haller. Translated by Shirley Roe in Matter, Life, and Generation: Eighteenth-Century Embryology and the Haller-Wolff Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolff, Caspar Friedrich. 1759 [1896]. Theoria generationis. 2 vols. German translation by Paul Samassa. Leipzig: Verlag Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
Wolff, Caspar Friedrich. 1764. Theorie von der Generation. Berlin: Friedrich Wilhelm Birnstiel.Google Scholar
Wolff, Caspar Friedrich. 1789. Von der eigenthümlichen und wesentlichen Kraft der vegetabilischen sowohl als auch der animalischen Substanz. St. Petersburg: Kayserliche Academie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Wolff, Caspar Friedrich. 1973. Objecta meditationum pro theoria monstrorum. Translated as Predmety razmyshleniï v sviazi s teorieï urodov by Iu. Kh. Kopelevich and T. A. Lukina. Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Nauka.Google Scholar
Aarsleff, Hans. 1989. The Berlin Academy and Frederick the Great. History of the Human Sciences 2: 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adelmann, Howard B . 1942. The Embryological Treatises of Hieronymus Fabricius of Aquapendente. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Adelmann, Howard B. 1966. Marcello Malpighi and the Evolution of Embryology. 5 vols. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Albrecht, Michael. 1994. Eklektik: Eine Begriffsgeschichte mit Hinweisen auf die Philosophie- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry. 1991. Kant's Antinomy of Teleological Judgment. Southern Journal of Philosophy 30: 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Lorin. 1982. Charles Bonnet and the Order of the Known. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anstey, Peter. 2000. The Philosophy of Robert Boyle. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appel, T A. 1987. The Cuvier-Geoffroy Debate: French Biology in the Decades before Darwin. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger. 1999. Descartes and the Last Scholastics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger, and Marjorie, Grene. 1997. The Cartesian Destiny of Form and Matter. Early Science and Medicine 2: 300–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, Richard T. W. 1989. Russell's Conundrum: On the Relation of Leibniz's Monads to the Continuum: An Intimate Relation. In Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, ed. James Robert Brown and Jürgen Mittelstrass, . Dordrecht: Kluwer, 171–201.Google Scholar
Arthur, Richard T. W. 1998. Infinite Aggregates and Phenomenal Wholes. Leibniz Society Review 8 (12): 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, Richard T. W., ed. and trans. 2001. G. W. Leibniz: The Labyrinth of the Continuum. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Arthur, Richard T. W. 2003. The Enigma of Leibniz's Atomism. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 1: 243–302.Google Scholar
Asma, Stephen T. 1996. Following Form and Function: A Philosophical Archaeology of Life Science. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Aucante, Vincent. 1999. Les médecins et la médecine. In La biografia intelletuale di René Descartes attraverso la Correspondance. Naples: Vivarium, 607–25.Google Scholar
Aucante, Vincent. 2000. Le rôle du coeur de Fludd à Descartes et Harvey. In Pour une civilisation du coeur. Paris, 51–61.Google Scholar
Aucante, Vincent. 2002. La théorie de l'âme de Jean Fernel. Corpus 41: 9–42.Google Scholar
Aucante, Vincent. 2004. La vision chez Descartes et Plempius. In Il Seicento e Descartes: Dibattiti cartesiani. Florence: Le Monnier, 233–54.Google Scholar
Aulie, Richard. 1961. Caspar Friedrich Wolff and His ‘Theoria Generationis’, 1759. Journal of the History of Medicine 16: 124–44.Google Scholar
Balan, Bernard. 1988. Génération, organisation, développement: L'enjeu de l'épigénèse. In Entre forme et histoire: La formation de la notion de développement à l'âge classique. Paris: Meridiens Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, J. W. 1897. Teratogenesis: An Inquiry into the Causes of Monstrosities: History of the Theories of the Past. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Balme, D. M. 1962. Development of Biology in Aristotle and Theophrastus: Theory of Spontaneous Generation. Phronesis 7: 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balme, David. 1987. Aristotle's Biology Was Not Essentialist. In Gotthelf and Lennox.
Balme, David. 1987. The Place of Biology in Aristotle's Philosophy. In Gotthelf and Lennox.
Balme, D. M. 1990. Ανθρωποs ανθρωπον γεννα: Human Is Generated by Human. In The Human Embryo: Aristotle and the Arabic and European Traditions, ed. G. R. Dunstan,Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 20–31.Google Scholar
Balme, D. M. 1991. Aristotle: History of Animals, Books VII–X. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Balme, D. M. 1992. Aristotle: De Partibus Animalium I and De Generatione Animalium I (with passages from II. 1–3). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Balme, D. M. 2002. Aristotle: Historia Animalium, Volume I: Books I–X (prepared for publication by Allan Gotthelf). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baroncini, Gabriele. 1992. Forme di esperienza scientifica. Florence: Olschki.
Bartuschat, Wolfgang. 1972. Zum systematischen Ort von Kants Kritik der Urteilskraft. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Bates, Don. 2000. Machina Ex Deo: William Harvey and the Meaning of Instrument. Journal of the History of Ideas 61: 577–93.Google Scholar
Baxter, Alice Levine. 1976. Edmund B. Wilson as a Preformationist: Some Reasons for His Acceptance of the Chromosome Theory. Journal of the History of Biology 9(1): 29–57.Google Scholar
Beeson, David. 1992. Maupertuis: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
Bernardi, Walter. 1986. Le metafisiche dell'embrione: Scienze della vita e filosofia da Malpighi a Spallanzani, 1672–1793. Florence: Leo S. Olschki Editore.Google Scholar
Bitbol-Hespériès, Annie. 1990. Le principe de vie chez Descartes. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Bitbol-Hespériès, Annie. 1991. Le dualisme dans la correspondance entre Henry More et Descartes. In Autour de Descartes, Le problème de l'âme et du dualisme, ed. Vieillard-Baron, J.-L.. Paris: Vrin, 141–58.Google Scholar
Bitbol-Hespériès, Annie. 1996. Connaissance de l'homme, connaissance de Dieu. Les Etudes Philosophiques 4: 507–33.Google Scholar
Bitbol-Hespériès, Annie. 1999. Descartes, Harvey et la Renaissance. In Descartes et la Renaissance, ed. Faye, E.. Paris: H. Champion, 323–47.Google Scholar
Bitbol-Hespériès, Annie. 2000. Cartesian Physiology. In Descartes'Natural Philosophy, ed. Stephen Gaukroger, John, Schuster, and John, Sutton. London: Routledge, 349–82.Google Scholar
Bloch, Olivier R. 1971. La philosophie de Gassendi: Nominalisme, matérialisme et métaphysique. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Bodemer, Charles W. 1964. Regeneration and the Decline of Preformationism in Eighteenth-Century Embryology. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 38 (1): 20–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Bodemer, Charles W. 1968. Embryological Thought in Seventeenth-Century England. Medical Investigations in Seventeenth-Century England. Los Angeles: William Andrews Clark Memorial Library.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. 1987. Definition and Scientific Method in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals. In Gotthelf and Lennox.
Bouillier, Francisque. 1862. Du principe vital et de l'âme pensante: Examen des diverses doctrines médicales et physiologiques sur les rapports de l'âme et de la vie. Paris: Baillière et Fils.Google Scholar
Bowler, Peter J. 1971. Preformation and Pre-existence in the Seventeenth Century: A Brief Analysis. Journal of the History of Biology 4: 221–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowler, Peter J. 1975. The Changing Meaning of “Evolution.”Journal of the History of Ideas 36: 95–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broad, Jacqueline. 2002. Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Harcourt. 1963. Maupertuis Philosophe: Enlightenment and the Berlin Academy. Studies on Voltaire 24: 255–69.Google Scholar
Brown, Theodore. 1974. From Mechanism to Vitalism in Eighteenth-Century Physiology. Journal of the History of Biology 7: 179–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchdahl, Gerd. 1969. Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science: The Classical Origins: Descartes to Kant. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Buscaglia, Marino, et al., eds. 1994. Charles Bonnet savant et philosophe (1720–1793). Geneva: Éditions Passé Présent.Google Scholar
Büttner, Manfred. 1973. Zum Übergang von der teleologischen zur kausalmechanischen Betrachtung der geographisch-kosmologischen Fakten: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Geographie von Wolff bis Kant. Studia Leibnitiana 5: 177–95.Google Scholar
Butts, Robert, ed. 1986. Kant's Philosophy of Physical Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butts, Robert. 1990. Teleology and Scientific Method in Kant'sCritique of Judgment. Nous 24: 1–16.Google Scholar
Bylebyl, J. 1973. The Growth of Harvey's De Motu Cordis. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 47: 427–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Bylebyl, J. 1977. De Motu Cordis: Written in Two Stages? Response. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 51: 140–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Bylebyl, J. 1979. The School of Padua: Humanistic Medicine in the Sixteenth Century. In Health, Medicine and Mortality in the Sixteenth Century, ed. C. Webster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 335–70.
Calinger, Ronald. 1968. Frederick the Great and the Berlin Academy of Sciences (1740–1766). Annals of Science 24: 239–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callot, Emile. 1965. La philosophie de la vie au XVIIIe siecle. Paris: Riviere.Google Scholar
Canguilhem, Georges. 2003. Le normal et le pathologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1951. Philosophy of the Enlightenment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1981. Kant's Life and Thought. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Céard, Jean. 1977. La nature et les prodiges: L'insolite au XVIe siècle. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Ceglia, Francesco Paolo . 2000. Introduzione alla fisiologia di Georg Ernst Stahl. Lecce: Pensa.Google Scholar
Ceglia, Francesco Paolo . 2002. Ipocondria ed isteria nel sistema medico di Georg Ernst Stahl. Medicinae & Storia 2 (4): 51–86.Google Scholar
Chang Ku-Ming, Kevin. 2002. The Matter of Life: Georg Ernst Stahl and the Reconceptualizations of Matter, Body and Life in Early Modern Europe. Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Cherni, Amor. 1995. Haller et Buffon: À propos des réflexions. Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 48: 267–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherni, Amor. 1998. L'épistémologie de la transparence: Sur l'embryologie de A. von Haller. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Churchill, Frederick B. 1970. The History of Embryology as Intellectual History. Journal of the History of Biology 3: 155–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clericuzio, Antonio. 2000. Elements, Principles, and Corpuscles: A Study of Atomism and Chemistry in the Seventeenth Century. Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Idées. no. 171. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clucas, Stephen. 1997. “The Infinite Variety of Formes and Magnitude”: 16th and 17th Century English Corpuscular Philosophy and Aristotelian Theories of Matter and Form. Early Science and Medicine 2: 251–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, Matthew. 2000. Reading and Writing the Book of Nature: Jan Swammerdam (1637–1680). Endeavour 24: 122–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, Matthew. 2002. Malpighi, Swammerdam and the Colourful Silkworm: Replication and Visual Representation in Early Modern Science. Annals of Science 59: 111–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, Francis J. 1930. Early Theories of Sexual Generation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, W. 1964. Georges Cuvier, Zoologist: A Study in the History of Evolution Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, J. F. 1986. Newton of the Grassblade? Darwin and the Problem of Organic Teleology. Isis 77: 405–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costabel, Pierre. 1979. L'affaire Maupertuis-Koenig et les “questions de fait”: Arithmos-Arrythmos. In Skizzen aus der Wissenschaftsgeschichte, ed. K. Figala and E. Berninger. Munich: Minerva Publikation, 29–48.
Cottingham, John. 1992. Cartesian Dualism: Theology, Metaphysics, and Science. The Cambridge Companion to Descartes. New York: Cambridge University Press, 236–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coudert, Alison. 1975. A Cambridge Platonist's Kabbalist Nightmare. Journal of the History of Ideas 36: 633–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coudert, Alison P. 1999. The Impact of the Kabbalah in the Seventeenth Century. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Crombie, A. C. 1957. P. L. Moreau de Maupertuis, F.R.S. (1698–1759): Précurseur du transformisme. Revue de Synthèse 58 (3): 35–56.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew. 1985. Fabricius and the “Aristotle Project” in Anatomical Teaching and Research at Padua. In The Medical Renaissance of the Sixteenth Century, ed. Wear, A., French, R. K., and Lonie, I. M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 195–222.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew. 1997. The Anatomical Renaissance: The Resurrection of the Anatomical Projects of the Ancients. Aldershot: Scholar Press.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Andrew. 2002–3. The Pen and the Sword: Recovering the Disciplinary Identity of Physiology and Anatomy before 1800. Pts. 1 and 2. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33: 631–65; 34: 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De, Angelis Simone. 2003. Von Haller zu Newton: Studien zum Naturbegriff zwischen Empirismus und deduktiver Methode in der Schweizer Frühaufklärung. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Delage, Yves. 1903. L'hérédité et les grands problèmes de la biologie générale. 3rd ed. Paris: Schliecher Frères.Google Scholar
De, Ley H. 1980. Pangenesis versus Panspermia: Democritean Notes on Aristotle's Generation of Animals. Hermes: Zeitschrift für Klassische Philologie 108: 129–53.Google Scholar
Des, Chene Dennis. 2001. Spirits and Clocks: Machine and Organism in Descartes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Detel, Wolfgang. 1978. Scientia rerum natura occultarum: Methodologische Studien zur Physik Pierre Gassendis. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detlefsen, Karen. 2003. Supernaturalism, Occasionalism, and Preformation in Malebranche. Perspectives on Science 11: 443–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobell, Clifford. 1932. Antony van Leeuwenhoek and his “Little Animals.”London: Bale.Google Scholar
Driesch, Hans. 1914. The History and Theory of Vitalism. Trans. C. K. Ogden. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchesneau, François. 1979. Haller et les théories de Buffon et C. F. Wolff sur l'épigénèse. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 1 (1): 65–100.Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François. 1982. La physiologie des lumières: Empirisme, modèles et théories. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François. 1985. Vitalism in Late Eighteenth-Century Physiology: The Cases of Barthez, Blumenbach and John Hunter. In William Hunter and the Eighteenth-Century Medical World, ed. W. F. Bynum and Roy Porter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François. 1993. Leibniz et la méthode de la science. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François. 1994. La dynamique de Leibniz. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François. 1998. Les modèles du vivant de Descartes à Leibniz. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François. 2003. Louis Bourguet et le modèle des corps organiques: Antonio Vallisneri. In L'edizione del testo scientifico d'età moderna, ed. Monti, M. T.. Florence: Olschki, 3–31.Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François. 2003. Charles Bonnet et le concept leibnizien d'organisme. Medicina nei Secoli 15: 349–67.Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François. 2003. Leibniz's Model for Analyzing Organic Phenomena. Perspectives on Science 11: 378–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duran, Jane. 1989. Anne Viscountess Conway: A Seventeenth Century Rationalist. Hypatia 4 (1): 64–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Bernard. 1997. La maison de Kant / The House That Kant Built. Trans. Graeme Hunter. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, Dietrich von. 1997. Vitalism between Science and Philosophy in Germany around 1800. In Vitalisms from Haller to the Cell Theory, ed. Guido Cimino and François, Duchesneau. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Fagot, Anne. 1975. Le “transformisme” de Maupertuis. In Actes de la journée Maupertuis (Créteil, 1er décembre 1973). Paris: Vrin, 163–78.Google Scholar
Fantini, Bernardino. 1994. Le cristal comme métaphore de la vie. In Charles Bonnet savant et philosophe (1720–1793), ed. Buscaglia, M. et al. Geneva: Éditions Passé Présent, 105–19.Google Scholar
Farber, Paul Lawrence. 1982. Research Traditions in Eighteenth-Century Natural History. In Spallanzani e la Biologia del Settecento, ed. Giuseppe Montalenti and Paolo Rossi, Lazzaro. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Farley, John. 1977. The Spontaneous Generation Controversy from Descartes to Oparin. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrari, Jean. 1999. Kant, Maupertuis et le principe de moindre action. In Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupertuis: Eine Bilanz nach 300 Jahren, ed. Hartmut Hecht. Berlin: Arno Spitz, 225–34.
Feuer, Lewis. 1963. The Scientific Intellectual. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fisher, Saul. 2005. Pierre Gassendi's Philosophy of Science. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, Edward T. 1969. Harvey: Spontaneous Generation and the Egg. Annals of Science 25 (2): 139–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1970. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Fouke, Daniel C. 1989. Mechanical and “Organical” Models in Seventeenth-Century Explanations of Biological Reproduction. Science in Context 3: 365–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fournier, Marian. 1996. The Fabric of Life: Microscopy in the Seventeenth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, R. Jr. 1980. Harvey and the Oxford Physiologists: Scientific Ideas and Social Interaction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
French, Roger. 1994. William Harvey's Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
French, Roger. 1995. Two Natural Philosophies. In William Harvey's Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fricke, Christel. 1990. Explaining the Inexplicable: The Hypothesis of the Faculty of Reflective Judgement in Kant's Third Critique. Noûs24.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 1991. Regulative and Constitutive: System and Teleology in Kant's Critique of Judgment. Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (suppl.): 73–102.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 1992. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 1992. Causal Laws and the Foundations of Natural Science. In The Cambridge Companion to Kant, ed. Paul, Guyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 161–99.Google Scholar
Gaissinovitch, A. E. 1968. Le rôle du newtonianisme dans la renaissance des idées épigénétiques en embryologie du XVIIIe siècle. Actes du Ⅺe Congrès International d'Histoire des Sciences 5: 105–10.Google Scholar
Gaissinovitch, A. E. 1982. Influence des travaux de Caspar Friedrich Wolff sur la biologie du XVIIIe siècle. In Lazzaro Spallanzani e la Biologia del Settecento, ed. Giuseppe, Montalenti and Paolo, Rossi. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Gaissinovitch, A. E. 1990. C. F. Wolff on Variability and Heredity. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 12: 179–201.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel. 1992. Descartes' Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel. 1995. Leibniz: Physics and Philosophy. In The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. New York: Cambridge University Press, 270–352.Google Scholar
Gasking, Elizabeth. 1967. Investigations into Generation: 1651–1828. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen. 2000. The Resources of a Mechanist Physiology and the Problem of Goal-Directed Processes. In Descartes' Natural Philosophy, ed. Gaukroger, Stephen, Schuster, John, and John, Sutton. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen. 2002. Descartes' System of Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genova, A. 1974. Kant's Epigenesis of Pure Reason. Kant-Studien 65: 259–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyer-Kordesch, Johanna. 1985. Die Theoria medica vera und Georg Ernst Stahls Verhältnis zur Aufklärung. In Georg Ernst Stahl (1659–1734), ed. Kaiser, Wolfram and Arina, Völker. Halle: Wissenschaftliche Beiträge der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittemberg, 89–98.Google Scholar
Geyer-Kordesch, Johanna. 2000. Pietismus, Medizin und Aufklärung in Preußen im 18. Jahrhundert: Das Leben und Werk Georg Ernst Stahls. Tübingen: M. Niemeyer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giglioni, Guido. 1999. Girolamo Cardano e Giulio Cesare Scaligero: Il dibattito sul ruolo dell'anima vegetativa. In Girolamo Cardano: Le opere, le fonti, la vita, ed. Baldi, Marialuisa and Guido, Canziani. Milan: Franco Angeli, 313–39.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. 2001. Kant on Understanding Organisms as Natural Purposes. In Kant and the Sciences, ed. Watkins, E.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 231–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, Bentley. 1959. Maupertuis, Pioneer of Genetics and Evolution. In Forerunners of Darwin: 1745–1859, ed. Bentley Glass et al. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 51–83.
Gontier, Thierry. 1998. De L'homme à l'animal. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Goodrum, Matthew R. 2002. Atomism, Atheism, and the Spontaneous Generation of Human Beings: The Debate over a Natural Origin of the First Humans in Seventeenth-Century Britain. Journal of the History of Ideas 63: 207–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gossman, Lionel. 1960. Berkeley, Hume and Maupertuis. French Studies 14: 304–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 1976–7. Aristotle's Conception of Final Causality. Review of Metaphysics 30: 226–54. Reprinted with postscript in Gotthelf and Lennox 1987.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, Allan. 1989. Teleology and Spontaneous Generation in Aristotle: A Discussion. Apeiron 22: 181–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotthelf, Allan, and James, G. Lennox, eds. 1987. Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, Bernhard Joseph. 1943. Bedeutung und Auswirkungen des hallischen Professors und kgl. preuß. Leibarztes Georg Ernst Stahl, auf den Vitalismus des XVIII. Jahrhunderts, insbesondere auf die Schule von Montpellier. Nova Acta Leopoldina: Neue Folge 89 (12): 423–502.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1996. Full House: The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin. New York: Three Rivers Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1997. Foreword to Clara Pinto-Correia, The Ovary of Eve: Egg, Sperm and Preformation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, John C. 1959. The Death of Adam: Evolution and its Impact on Western Thought. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
Grene, Marjorie, and David, Depew. 2004. The Philosophy of Biology: An Episodic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueroult, Martial. 1980. The Metaphysics and Physics of Force in Descartes. In Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics, ed. Stephen, Gaukroger. Sussex: Sussex Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Gunther, R. T., ed. 1923–67. Early Science in Oxford. 15 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1969. A History of Greek Philosophy. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2000. Editor's introduction to Immanuel Kant, Critique of the Power of Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2001. Organisms and the Unity of Science. In Kant and the Sciences, ed. Watkins, E.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 259–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, T. S. 1968. On Biological Analogs of Newtonian Paradigms. Philosophy of Science 35: 6–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, T. S. 1982. Spallanzani on Matter and Life, with Notes on the Influence of Descartes. In Lazzaro Spallanzani e la Biologia del Settecento, ed. Montalenti, Giuseppe and Rossi, Paolo. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Hartz, Glenn. 1998. Why Corporeal Substances Keep Popping up in Leibniz's Later Philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6: 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, Gary. 1979. Force (God) in Descartes' Physics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 10: 113–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, Gary. 1992. Descartes' Physiology and Its Relation to Psychology. In The Cambridge Companion to Descartes. New York: Cambridge University Press, 335–70.Google Scholar
Hecht, Hartmut. 1994. Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupertuis oder die Schwierigkeit der Unterscheidung von Newtonianern und Leibnitianern. In Leibniz und Europa: Vorträge des VI. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses. Hannover: 18. bis 23 Juli 1994. Hannover: Leibniz Gesellschaft, 331–8.Google Scholar
Hecht, Hartmut, ed. 1999. Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupertuis: Eine Bilanz nach 300 Jahren. Berlin: Arno Spitz.Google Scholar
Hein, Hilde. 1972. The Endurance of the Mechanism-Vitalism Controversy. Journal of the History of Biology 5: 159–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helm, Jürgen. 2000. Das Medizinkonzept Georg Ernst Stahls und seine Rezeption im Halleschen Pietismus und in der Zeit der Romantik. Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 23: 167–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, John. 1986. Occult Qualities and the Experimental Philosophy: Active Principles in Pre-Newtonian Matter Theory. History of Science 24: 335–81. Reprinted in Vere, Chappell, ed., Essays on Early Modern Philosophers from Descartes and Hobbes to Newton and Leibniz: Seventeenth-Century Natural Scientists. New York: Garland Publishing, 1992; 1–47.Google Scholar
Hewson, M. A. 1975. Giles of Rome and the Medieval Theory of Conception. London: Athlon Press.Google Scholar
Hirai, Hiroshi. 2004. Le concept de semence dans les théories de la matière à la Renaissance: De Marsile Ficin à Pierre Gassendi. Brepols: Turnhout.Google Scholar
Hochdoerfer, Margarete. 1932. The Conflict between the Religious and the Scientific Views of Albrecht von Haller (1708–1777). Reprinted in Shirley A. Roe, The Natural History of Albrecht von Haller. New York: Arno Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Hoffheimer, Michael. 1982. Maupertuis and the Eighteenth-Century Critique of Preexistence. Journal of the History of Biology 15: 119–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, Paul. 1966. Atomisme et génétique: Étude de la pensée philosophique et physiologique de Gassendi appliquée à la définition de la féminité. Revue de Synthèse 87 (41–42): 21–44.Google Scholar
Holmes, S. J. 1948. Micromerism in Biological Theory. Isis 39: 145–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunemann, Philippe. 2002. Métaphysique et biologie: Kant et la constitution du concept d'organisme. Villeneuve: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Hutchison, Keith. 1982. What Happened to Occult Qualities in the Scientific Revolution?Isis 73: 233–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, Keith. 1983. Supernaturalism and the Mechanical Philosophy. History of Science 21: 297–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, Sarah. 1995. Anne Conway critique d'Henry More: L'esprit et la matière. Archives de Philosophie 58: 371–84.Google Scholar
Hutton, Sarah. 1996. Henry More and Anne Conway on Preexistence and Universal Salvation. In “Mind senior to the world”: Stoicismo e origenismo nella filosofia platonica del Seicento inglese, ed. Marialuisa, Baldi. Milan: Francoangeli, 113–25.Google Scholar
Hutton, Sarah. 1997. Anne Conway, Margaret Cavendish and Seventeenth-Century Scientific Thought. In Women, Science and Medicine 1500–1700, ed. Lynette, Hunter and Sarah, Hutton. Thrupp, England: Sutton Publishing, 218–34.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Annie. 1992. Matière inerte et matière vivante: La théorie de la perception chez Maupertuis. Dix-Huitième Siècle 24: 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iltis, Carolyn. 1973. The Leibnizian-Newtonian Debates: Natural Philosophy and Social Psychology. British Journal for the History of Science 6: 343–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, Jonathan, . 2001. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, François. 1973. The Logic of Life: A History of Heredity. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Jacob, Margaret. 1976. The Newtonians and the English Revolution, 1689–1720. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jedidi, Ali Bey. 1991. Les fondements de la biologie cartésienne. Paris: La Pensée Universelle.Google Scholar
Jouanna, Jacques. 1995. Hippocrate. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Joy, Lynn S. 1987. Gassendi the Atomist: Advocate of History in an Age of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Wolfram. 1985. Der Lehrkörper der Medizinischen Fakultät in der halleschen Amtszeit von Georg Ernst Stahl. Georg Ernst Stahl (1659–1734): Hallesches Symposium 1984, ed. A. Völker and W. Kaiser. Halle: Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittemberg, 59–66.
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schofield, M.. 1991. The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (abbreviated as KRS).Google Scholar
Koch, Richard. 1926. War Georg Ernst Stahl ein selbständiger Denker?Sudhoffs Archiv für Geschichte der Medizin und der Naturwissenschaften 18: 20–50.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre. 1957. From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press, 235–72.Google Scholar
Krolzik, Udo. 1980. Das physikotheologische Naturverständnis und sein Einfluß auf das naturwissenschaftliche Denken im 18. Jahrhundert. Medizinhistorisches Journal 15: 90–102.Google Scholar
Kruk, Remke. 1990. A Frothy Bubble: Spontaneous Generation in the Medieval Islamic Tradition. Journal of Semitic Studies 35 (2): 265–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubbinga, Henk. 2002. L'histoire du concept de “molécule.” 3 vols. Paris: Springer.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred. 2001. Kant: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulstad, Mark. 1991. Leibniz on Apperception, Consciousness, and Reflection. Munich: Philosophia Verlag.Google Scholar
Labrousse, Élisabeth. 1964. Pierre Bayle. Vol. 3. Hétérodoxie et rigorisme. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labrousse, Élisabeth. 1982. Introduction historique. In Pierre, Bayle, Oeuvres diverses. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Labrousse, Élisabeth. 1985. Pierre Bayle. Vol. 1. Du pays de foix à la cité d'Érasme. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, James L. 1994. Interpreting Nature: The Science of Living Form from Linnaeus to Kant. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, Rachel. 1987. From Mineralogy to Geology: The Foundations of a Science, 1650–1830. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laywine, Alison. 1993. Kant's Early Metaphysics and the Origins of the Critical Philosophy. North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy, no. 3. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.Google Scholar
Lemoine, Albert. 1864. Le vitalisme et l'animisme de Stahl. Paris: Germer Baillière.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1982. Teleology, Chance, and Aristotle's Theory of Spontaneous Generation. Journal of the History of Philosophy 20: 219–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1985. Are Aristotelian Species Eternal? In Aristotle on Nature and Living Things, ed. , A. Gotthelf. Pittsburgh: Mathesis Publications, 67–94. Reprinted in J. G. Lennox, Aristotle's Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001; 131–59.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1986. Aristotle, Galileo and the Mixed Sciences. In Reinterpreting Galileo, ed. W. Wallace. Washington, DC: Catholic University Press of America, 29–52.
Lennox, J. G. 1987. Divide and Explain: The Posterior Analytics in Practice. In Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, eds. Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 90–119. Reprinted in Lennox, J. G.. Aristotle's Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001; 7–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1991. Between Data and Demonstration: The Analytics and the Historia Animalium. In Science and Philosophy in Classical Greece, ed. Bowen, A.. New York: Garland Publishing, 261–94. Reprinted in Lennox, J. G.. Aristotle's Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001; 39–71.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 1997. Nature does nothing in vain…. In Beiträge zur antiken Philosophie: Festschrift für Wolfgang Kullmann, ed. Günther, H.-C. and Rengakos, A.. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 199–214. Reprinted in Lennox, J. G.. Aristotle's Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001; 205–24.Google Scholar
Lenoir, Timothy. 1980. Kant, Blumenbach, and Vital Materialism in German Biology. Isis 71: 77–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenoir, Timothy. 1981. The Göttingen School and the Development of Transcendental Naturphilosophie in the Romantic Era. Studies in History of Biology 5: 111–205.Google ScholarPubMed
Lenoir, Timothy. 1982. The Strategy of Life: Teleology and Mechanics in Nineteenth Century German Biology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Lesky, Erna. 1950. Die Zeugungs- und Vererbungslehren der Antike und ihr Nachwirken. Mainz: Verlag der Akademie der Wissenschaft und der Literatur in Mainz. Abhandlungen der geistes- und sozialwissenschaftslichen Klasse. 19, 1225–1425.Google Scholar
Lewis, Eric. 2001. Walter Charleton and Early Modern Eclecticism. Journal of the History of Ideas 62: 651–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 1987. Empirical Research in Aristotle's Biology. In Gotthelf, and Lennox, .
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1996. Aristotelian Explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loewisch, D. J. 1965. Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft und Humes Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Kant Studien 56: 1170–1207.Google Scholar
Lohff, Brigitte. 1997. The Concept of Vital Forces as a Research Program: From Mid-XVIIIth Century to Johannes Müller. In Vitalisms from Haller to the Cell Theory, ed. Guido, Cimino and François, Duchesneau. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Loptson, Peter. 1982. Introduction to The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy, by Anne Conway. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. 1911 [1959]. Kant and Evolution. In Forerunners of Darwin, ed. Glass, Bentley, Owsei, Temkin, and Strauss, W. L. Jr.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lüthy, Christoph. 1996. Atoms, Microscopes, and Causality: “Visual Reductionism” in the 17th Century. Ph.D. diss. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Magner, Lois N. 1994. A History of the Life Sciences. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Maienschein, Jane. 1985. Preformation or New Formation – Or Neither or Both? In The Eighth Symposium of the British Society for Developmental Biology: A History of Embryology, ed. Horder, T. J., Witkowski, J. A., and Wylie, C. C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marc-Wogau, Konrad. 1938. Vier Studien zu Kants Kritik der Urteilskraft. Leipzig: Otto Harrassowitz, 73–108.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter. 1982. Blumenbach und der Bildungstrieb: Zum Verhältnis von epigenetischer Embryologie und typologischem Artbegriff. Medizinhistorisches Journal 17: 357–72.Google ScholarPubMed
McLaughlin, Peter. 1990. Kant's Critique of Teleology in Biological Explanation. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen.Google Scholar
McRobert, Jennifer. 2000. Anne Conway's Vitalism and her Critique of Descartes. International Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1): 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinel, Christoph. 1988. Early Seventeenth-Century Atomism: Theory, Epistemology, and the Insufficiency of Experiment. Isis 79: 68–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ménard, Pierre. 1937. L'esprit de la physiologie cartésienne. Archives de Philosophie 13: 191.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Everett I. 1976. Philosophical Biology versus Experimental Biology: Spontaneous Generation in the Seventeenth Century. In Topics in the Philosophy of Biology, ed. Marjorie, Grene and Everett, Mendelsohn. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 37–65.Google Scholar
Mercer, Christia. 2001. Leibniz's Metaphysics: Its Origins and Development. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, Carolyn. 1979. The Vitalism of Anne Conway: Its Impact on Leibniz's Concept of the Monad. Journal of the History of Philosophy 17: 255–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meschini, F. 1998. Neurofisiologia cartesiana. Florence: Leo S. Olschki Editore.Google Scholar
Michael, Emily. 1997. Daniel Sennert on Matter and Form: At the Juncture of the Old and the New. Early Science and Medicine 2: 272–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Emily. 2001. Sennert's Sea Change: Atoms and Causes. In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories, ed. Lüthy, Christoph, John, E. Murdoch, and William, R. Newman. Leiden: Brill, 331–62.Google Scholar
Michael, Emily, and Fred, S. Michael. 1988. Gassendi on Sensation and Reflection: A Non-Cartesian Dualism. History of European Ideas 9: 583–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Emily, and Fred, S. Michael. 1989. Two Early Modern Concepts of Mind: Reflecting Substance vs. Thinking Substance. Journal of the History of Philosophy 27: 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mocek, Reinhard. 1995. Caspar Friedrich Wolffs Epigenesis-Konzept: Ein Problem im Wandel der Zeit. Biologisches Zentralblatt 114: 179–90.Google Scholar
Monti, Maria Teresa. 1988. Difficultés et arguments de l'embryologie d'Albrecht von Haller: La reconversion des catégories de l'anatome animata. Revue des Sciences, Philosophiques et Théologiques 72: 301–12.Google Scholar
Monti, Maria Teresa. 1989. Théologie physique et mécanisme dans la physiologie de Haller. In Science and Religion / Wissenschaft und Religion: Proceedings of the Symposium of the XVIIIth International Congress of History of Science. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Monti, Maria Teresa. 1990. Congettura ed esperienza nella fisiologia di Haller. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Monti, Maria Teresa. 1997. Les dynamismes du corps et les forces du vivant dans la physiologie de Haller. In Vitalisms from Haller to the Cell Theory, ed. Cimino, Guido and François, Duchesneau. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Müller, Gerhard H. 1984. La conception de l'épigénèse chez Caspar Friedrich Wolff (1734–1794). Revista di Biologia 77: 343–62.Google Scholar
Müller-Sievers, Helmut. 1997. Self-Generation: Biology, Philosophy, and Literature around 1800. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Musallam, Basim. 1990. The Human Embryo in Arabic Scientific and Religious Thought. In The Human Embryo: Aristotle and the Arabic and European Traditions, ed. Dunstan, G. R.. Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 32–46.Google Scholar
Needham, Joseph. 1959. A History of Embryology. Second edition, revised with the assistance of Arthur Hughes. New York: Abelard-Schuman.Google Scholar
Neubauer, John. 1983. Albrecht von Haller's Philosophy of Physiology. Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 215: 320–2.Google Scholar
Neubauer, John. 1984. La philosophie de la physiologie d'Albrecht von Haller. Revue de Synthèse113–14: 135–42.Google Scholar
Nicolson, Marjorie Hope, ed. 1992. The Conway Letters. Revised edition by Sarah Hutton. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Niebyl, Peter H. 1971. Sennert, van Helmont, and the Medical Ontology. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 45: 115–37.Google Scholar
Northwood, Heidi. 2003. The Passive Female Role in Aristotle's Embryology. Unpublished manuscript.
Oake, Roger. 1940. Did Maupertuis Read Hume's Treatise of Human Nature?Revue de Littérature Comparée 20: 81–7.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, Jane M. 1967. Essays in the History of Embryology and Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret. 1979. Descartes and Charleton on Nature and God. Journal of the History of Ideas 40: 445–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osler, Margaret. 1994. Divine Will and the Mechanical Philosophy: Gassendi and Descartes on Contingency and Necessity in the Created World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osler, Margaret. 2001. How Mechanical Was the Mechanical Philosophy? Non-Epicurean Themes in Gassendi's Atoms. In Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theory, ed. Lüthy, Christoph, Murdoch, John, and William, R. Newman. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ostoya, Paul. 1954. Maupertuis et la biologie. Revue d'Histoire des Sciences et de Leurs Applications 7: 60–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottosson, P.-G. 1984. Scholastic Medicine and Philosophy. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Outram, D. 1984. Georges Cuvier: Vocation, Science and Authority in Post Revolutionary France. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Pagel, Walter 1967. William Harvey's Biological Ideas. Basel: S. Karger.Google Scholar
Pagel, Walter. 1986. Aristotle and Seventeenth-Century Biological Thought. In From Paracelsus to Van Helmont: Studies in Renaissance Medicine and Science. London: Variorum Reprints, 489–509.
Palmerino, Carla-Rita. 1998. Atomi, meccanica, cosmologia: Le lettere Galileiane di Pierre Gassendi. Ph.D. diss., University of Florence.Google Scholar
Park, Katharine, and Lorraine, Daston. 1981. Unnatural Conceptions: The Study of Monsters in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century France and England. Past and Present 92: 20–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Katharine, and Lorraine, Daston. 1998. Wonders and the Order of Nature. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Parkinson, G. H. R. 1969. Science and Metaphysics in the Leibniz-Newton Controversy. Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa 2: 79–112.Google Scholar
Partington, J. R. 1961–2. A History of Chemistry. 4 vols. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Perfetti, S. 1999. Three Different Ways of Interpreting Aristotle's De Partibus Animalium: Pietro Pomponazzi, Niccolò Leonico Tomeo and Agostino Nifo. In Aristotle's Animals in the Middle Ages and Renaissance, ed. Steel, C., Guldentops, G., and Beullens, P.. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 297–316.Google Scholar
Perl, Margula. 1969. Physics and Metaphysics in Newton, Leibniz, and Clarke. Journal of the History of Ideas 30: 507–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perler, Dominik. 1996. Repräsentation bei Descartes. Klostermann: Frankfurt am Main.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, Peter. 1921. Geschichte der aristotelischen philosophie im protestantischen Deutschland. Leipzig: F. Meiner.Google Scholar
Phemister, Pauline. 1999. Leibniz and the Elements of Compound Bodies. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7(1–2): 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philipp, Wolfgang. 1967. Physicotheology in the Age of Enlightenment: Appearance and History. Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 57: 1233–67.Google Scholar
Pichot, André . 1993. Histoire de la notion de vie. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Pinto-Correia, Clara. 1997. The Ovary of Eve: Egg and Sperm and Preformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plaass, Peter. 1994. Kant's Theory of Natural Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Plamondon, Ann. 1975. The Contemporary Reconciliation of Mechanicism and Organicism. Dialectica 29 (4): 213–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plochmann, G. 1963. William Harvey and His Methods. Studies in the Renaissance 10: 192–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Roy. 1977. The Making of Geology: Earth Science in Britain, 1660–1815. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poser, Hans. 2000. Are Leibniz's Monads Corporeal Substances? Old Answers to a New Problem. Paper presented at the workshop on “Corporeal Substances and the Labyrinth of the Continuum in Leibniz” at the Florence Center for the History and Philosophy of Science, Florence, Italy, November 23–25.
Preus, Anthony. 1970. Science and Philosophy in Aristotle's Generation of Animals. Journal of the History of Biology 3: 1–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Priestley, F. E. L. 1970. The Clarke-Leibniz Controversy. In The Methodological Heritage of Newton, ed. Butts, Robert and John, Davis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 34–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, Rosamond. 1997. Special Cases: Natural Anomalies and Historical Monsters. San Francisco: Chronicle Books.Google Scholar
Pyle, Andrew. 1987. Animal Generation and Mechanical Philosophy: Some Light on the Role of Biology in the Scientific Revolution. Journal for the History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 9(2): 225–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Pyle, Andrew. 1997. Atomism and Its Critics. Bristol, England: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Pyle, Andrew. 2003. Malebranche. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rather, Lelland J. 1961. G. E. Stahl's Psychological Physiology. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 35: 37–49.Google Scholar
Rather, L. J. 1967. Thomas Fienus' (1567–1631) Dialectical Investigation of the Imagination as Cause and Cure of Bodily Disease. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 41: 349–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Reeve, C. D. C. 1981. Anaxagoras' Panspermism. Ancient Philosophy 1: 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reill, Peter Hanns. 1986. Science and the Science of History in the Spätaufklärung. In Aufklärung und Geschichte, ed. Boedekeret al., H. E.Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Reill, Peter Hanns. 1989. Anti-Mechanism, Vitalism and Their Political Implications in Late Enlightened Scientific Thought. Francia 16(2): 195–212.Google Scholar
Reill, Peter Hanns. 1992. Between Mechanism and Hermeticism: Nature and Science in the late Enlightenment. In Frühe Neuzeit – Frühe Moderne? ed. Vierhaus, Rudolf. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 393–421.Google Scholar
Reill, Peter Hanns. 1994. Science and the Construction of the Cultural Sciences in Late Enlightenment Germany: The Case of Wilhelm von Humboldt. History and Theory 33: 345–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reill, Peter Hanns. 1995. Anthropology, Nature and History in the Late Enlightenment: The Case of Friedrich Schiller. In Schiller als Historiker, ed. Dann, Otto, Norbert, Oellers, and Ernst, Osterkamp. Stuttgart: Metzler, 243–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reill, Peter Hanns. 1998. Analogy, Comparison, and Active Living Forces: Late Enlightenment Responses to the Skeptical Critique of Causal Analysis. In The Skeptical Tradition around 1800, ed. Zande, Johann and Richard, Popkin. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 203–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reill, Peter Hanns. Forthcoming. Vitalizing Nature in the Enlightenment. Berlekey: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rey, Roselyne. 1997. Gassendi et les sciences de la vie au XVIIIe siècle. In Gassendi et l'Europe, ed. Murr, Sylvia. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Richards, Robert. 2000. Kant and Blumenbach on the Bildungstrieb: A Historical Misunderstanding. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biology and the Biomedical Sciences 31: 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Robert. 2003. The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rieppel, Olivier 1987. Organization in the Lettres Philosophiques of Louis Bourguet Compared to the Writings of Charles Bonnet. Gesnerus 44: 125–32.Google Scholar
Rieppel, Olivier. 1988. The Reception of Leibniz's Philosophy in the Writings of Charles Bonnet (1720–1793). Journal of the History of Biology 21: 119–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinet, André . 1970. Malebranche de l'Académie des Sciences. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Robinet, André . 1975. Place de la polémique Maupertuis-Diderot dans l'oeuvre de Dom Deschamps. In Actes de la journée Maupertuis (Créteil, 1er décembre 1973). Paris: Vrin, 33–46.Google Scholar
Rocci, Giovanni. 1975. Charles Bonnet: Filosofia e scienza. Florence: G. C. Sansoni.Google Scholar
Rochot, Bernard. 1944. Les travaux de Gassendi sur Épicure et sur l'atomisme, 1619–1648. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Roe, Shirley. 1975. The Development of Albrecht von Haller's Views on Embryology. Journal of the History of Biology 8: 167–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Roe, Shirley. 1979. Rationalism and Embryology: Caspar Friedrich Wolff's Theory of Epigenesis. Journal of the History of Biology 12: 1–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roe, Shirley. 1981. Matter, Life, and Generation: Eighteenth-Century Embryology and the Haller-Wolff Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roe, Shirley. 1984. Anatomia Animata: The Newtonian Physiology of Albrecht von Haller. In Transformation and Tradition in the Sciences, ed. Mendelsohn, Everett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roe, Shirley. 1985. Voltaire versus Needham: Atheism, Materialism, and the Generation of Life. Journal of the History of Ideas 46: 65–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roger, Jacques. 1963. Les sciences de la vie dans la pensée française au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: A. Colin. Second edition 1971.Google Scholar
Roger, Jacques. 1988. La notion de développement chez les naturalistes du XVIIIe siècle. In Entre forme et histoire: La formation de la notion de développement à l'âge classique. Paris: Meridiens Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Roger, Jacques. 1997. The Life Sciences in Eighteenth-Century French Thought. Trans. Robert Ellrich, ed. Keith, R. Benson. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Ross, G. MacDonald. 1983. Occultism and Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century. Paper presented at a conference of the Royal Institute of Philosophy.
Rudolph, Gerhard. 1991. La méthode hallérienne en physiologie. Dix-Huitième Siècle 23: 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruestow, Edward. 1985. Piety and the Defense of Natural Order: Swammerdam on Generation. In Religion, Science and Worldview, ed. Osler, Margaret and Paul, Farber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. 1979. The Darwinian Revolution: Science Red in Tooth and Claw.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. 1996. Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. 2003. Darwin and Design: Does Evolution Have a Purpose?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. 2005. On a Darkling Plain: The Evolution-Creation Struggle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, E. S. 1930. The Interpretation of Development and Heredity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Russo, François. 1978. Théologie naturelle et sécularisation de la science au XVIIIe siècle. Recherches de Science Religieuse 66: 27–62.Google Scholar
Salomon-Bayet, Claire. 1975. Maupertuis et l'institution. In Actes de la journée Maupertuis (Créteil, 1er décembre 1973). Paris: Vrin, 183–202.Google Scholar
Sandler, Iris. 1983. Pierre Louis Moreau de Maupertuis: A Precursor of Mendel?Journal of the History of Biology 16: 101–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanhueza, Gabriel. 1997. La pensée biologique de Descartes dans ses rapports avec la philosophie scolastique: Le cas Gomez Péreira. La philosophie en commun. Paris and Montréal: l'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Savioz, Raymond. 1948. Mémoires autographes de Charles Bonnet de Genève. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Savioz, Raymond. 1948. La philosophie de Charles Bonnet de Genève. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Scala, Aidée. 2004. Girolamo Rorario: Un umanista diplomatico del Cinquecento e i suoi “Dialoghi.”Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Schechner-Genuth, Sara. 1997. Comets, Popular Culture, and the Birth of Cosmology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schierbeek, Abraham. 1967. Jan Swammerdam, 1637–1680: His Life and Works. Amsterdam: Swets Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles. 1983. Aristotle and the Renaissance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Charles. 1984. Science in the Italian Universities in the Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Centuries. In The Aristotelian Tradition and Renaissance Universities, ed. Schmitt, Charles. London: Warburg Institute, 35–56.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles. 1985. Aristotle among the Physicians. In The Medical Renaissance of the Sixteenth Century, ed. Wear, A., French, R., and Lonie, I.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–16.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. 1989. Reappraisals in Renaissance Thought. London: Warburg Publications.Google Scholar
Scholem, Gershom. 1974. Kabbalah. New York: Dorset Press.Google Scholar
Schönfeld, Martin. 2000. The Philosophy of the Young Kant: The Precritical Project. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schott, Robin May. 1983. Cognition and Eros. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Schrecker, Paul. 1938. Malebranche et le préformisme biologique. Revue Internationale de Philosophique 1(1): 77–97.Google Scholar
Sepper, Dennis L. 1996. Descartes' Imagination: Proportion, Images, and the Activity of Thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1981. Of Gods and Kings: Natural Philosophy and Politics in the Leibniz-Clarke Disputes. Isis 72: 187–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shell, Susan. 1996. The Embodiment of Reason: Kant on Spirit, Generation, and Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Alison. 2001. Sensible Ends: Latent Teleology in Descartes' Account of Sensation. Journal of the History of Philosophy 39: 49–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloan, Phillip R. 1977. Descartes, the Sceptics, and the Rejection of Vitalism in Seventeenth-Century Physiology. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 8: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloan, Philip R. 1979. The Historical Interpretation of Biological Species. British Journal for the History of Science 12: 109–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloan, Phillip R. 1985. The Question of Natural Purpose: Historical Review. In Evolution and Creation, ed. McMullin, Ernan. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 121–44.Google Scholar
Sloan, Phillip R. 2002. Preforming the Categories: Eighteenth Century Generation Theory and the Biological Roots of Kant's A Priori. Journal of the History of Philosophy 40: 229–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, C. U. M. 1976. The Problem of Life: An Essay in the Origins of Biological Thought. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Justin E. H. 2004. Christian Platonism and the Metaphysics of Body in Leibniz. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12(1): 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonntag, Otto. 1974. Albrecht von Haller on the Future of Science. Journal of the History of Ideas 35: 313–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonntag, Otto. 1977. The Mental and Temperamental Qualities of Haller's Scientist. Physis 19: 173–84.Google Scholar
Stefani, Marta. 2002. Corruzione e generazione: John T. Needham e l'origine del vivente. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Steigerwald, Joan. 2002. Instruments of Judgement: Inscribing Organic Processes in Late Eighteenth-Century Germany. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33: 79–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrall, Mary. 1996. Salon, Academy, and Boudoir: Generation and Desire in Maupertuis's Science of Life. Isis 87: 217–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrall, Mary. 2002. The Man Who Flattened the Earth: Maupertuis and the Sciences in the Enlightenment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiele, Rüdiger. 1982. Leonhard Euler. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn. 1958. History of Magic and Experimental Science. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Toellner, Richard. 1971. Albrecht von Haller: Über die Einheit im Denken des letzten Universalgelehrten.Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Toellner, Richard. 1982. Die Bedeutung des physico-theologischen Gottesbeweises für die nachcartesianische Physiologie im 18. Jahrhundert. Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 5: 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toellner, Richard. 1997. Principles and Forces of Life in Haller. In Vitalisms from Haller to the Cell Theory, ed. Guido Cimino and François Duchesneau. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Tonelli, Giorgio. 1959. Der Streit über die mathematische Methode in der Philosophie in der ersten Hälfte des 18. Jahrhunderts und die Entstehung von Kants Schrift über die “Deutlichkeit.”Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 9: 57–66.Google Scholar
Tonelli, Giorgio. 1975. Conditions in Königsberg and the Making of Kant's Philosophy. In Bewußtsein: Gerhard Funke zu eigen, ed. Bucher, Alexius, Hermann Drüe, , and Thomas, Seebohm. Bonn: Bouvier, 126–44.Google Scholar
Tort, Patrick, ed. 1980. Bio-bibliographie. In Vénus physique. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Tymieniecka, Anna Teresa. 1965. Leibniz's Cosmological Synthesis. Netherlands, The Hague: Van Gorcum & Co.Google Scholar
Vartanian, Aram. 1953. Diderot and Descartes: A Study of Scientific Naturalism in the Enlightenment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vartanian, Aram. 1984. Díderot and Maupertuis. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 38: 46–66.Google Scholar
Vernière, Paul. 1954. Spinoza et la pensée Française avant la Révolution. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory. 1950. The Physical Theory of Anaxagoras. Philosophical Review 59: 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waschkies, Hans-Joachim. 1987. Physik und Physikotheologie des jungen Kant.Amsterdam: B. R. Grüner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric, ed. 2001. Kant and the Sciences.Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wear, A. 1983. William Harvey and the “Way of the Anatomists.”History of Science 21: 225–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissmann, August. 1893. Germplasm. Walter Scott's Contemporary Science Series no. 14.
Westfall, Richard S. 1971. Force in Newton's Physics. New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. M. 1899. Caspar Friedrich Wolff and the “Theoria Generationis.” Wood's Hole Biological Lectures for 1898. Boston.
Whitteridge, G. 1971. William Harvey and the Circulation of the Blood. London: MacDonald Publishers.Google Scholar
Whitteridge, G. 1981. William Harvey: Disputations Touching the Generation of Animals. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Wilkie, J. S. 1967. Preformation and Epigenesis: New Historical Treatment. History of Science 6: 138–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Elizabeth. 1994. The Physical and the Moral: Anthropology, Physiology, and Philosophical Medicine in France, 1750–1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1983. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Flamingo.Google Scholar
Wilson, Catherine. 1993. Interaction with the Reader in Kant's Transcendental Theory of Method. History of Philosophy Quarterly 10: 87–100.Google Scholar
Wilson, Catherine. 1995. The Invisible World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Philip K. 1992. Out of Sight, Out of Mind? The Daniel Turner-James Blondel Dispute over the Power of the Maternal Imagination. Annals of Science 49: 63–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, L. 1973. Functions. Philosophical Review 82: 139–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zammito, John H. 1992. The Genesis of Kant's Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Zammito, John. 1992. Kant versus Eighteenth Century Hylozoism. In The Genesis of Kant's “Critique of Judgment.”Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 189–99.Google Scholar
Zammito, John. 1998. “Method” vs “Manner”? Kant's Critique of Herder's “Ideen” in the Light of the Epoch of Science, 1790–1820. In Herder Jahrbuch / Herder Yearbook 1998, ed. Adler, Hans and Wölf, Koepke. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zammito, John H. 2002. Kant, Herder and the Birth of Anthropology.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zammito, John. 2003. This inscrutable “Principle” of an Original “Organization”: Epigenesis and “Looseness of Fit” in Kant's Philosophy of Science. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 34: 73–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zöller, Günter. 1988. Kant on the Generation of Metaphysical Knowledge. In Kant: Analysen – Probleme – Kritik, ed. Oberer, H. and Seel, G.. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 71–90.Google Scholar
Zumbach, Clark. 1984. The Transcendent Science: Kant's Conception of Biological Methodology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Justin E. H. Smith, Concordia University, Montréal
  • Book: The Problem of Animal Generation in Early Modern Philosophy
  • Online publication: 06 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498572.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Justin E. H. Smith, Concordia University, Montréal
  • Book: The Problem of Animal Generation in Early Modern Philosophy
  • Online publication: 06 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498572.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Justin E. H. Smith, Concordia University, Montréal
  • Book: The Problem of Animal Generation in Early Modern Philosophy
  • Online publication: 06 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498572.019
Available formats
×