Barney, W. L. (ed.). A Companion to 19th-Century America. Blackwell, 2006.Google Scholar

Blumenberg, H. The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Blumenberg, H. Work on Myth. MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, J. ‘Fasken Lecture – The essence of responsive regulation’. University of British Columbia Law Review 44:3 (2001).Google Scholar

Braithwaite, J. ‘Types of Responsiveness’, in Regulation Theory – Foundations and Applications, Drahos, P. (ed.). Australian National University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, J. and Zhang, Y.. ‘Persia to China: the Silk Road of restorative justice’, Asian Journal of Criminology 12:1 (2017): 23–38.Google Scholar

The British Academy. Reforming Business for the 21st Century: A Framework for the Future of the Corporation (2018) (published online)Google Scholar

Brownsword, R., Scotford, E., and Yeung, K. Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation and Technology. Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Christl, W. ‘Corporate Surveillance in Everyday Life – How Companies Collect, Combine, Analyse, Trade and Use Personal Data on Billions’. Report by Cracked Labs (Institute for Critical Digital Culture), Vienna, June 2017.Google Scholar

Christian, B. and Griffiths, T. Algorithms to Live By. Henry Holt, 2016.Google Scholar

Dau-Schmidt, K. ‘The impact of emerging information technologies on the employment relationship: New gigs for labor and employment law’. University of Chicago Legal Forum 2017: Article 4 (2018).Google Scholar

Descartes, R. Discourse on Method and Related Writings. Penguin, 2003.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. Meditations on First Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Domingos, P. The Master Algorithm. Allen Lane, 2015.Google Scholar

Drahos, P. (ed.). Regulation Theory – Foundations and Applications. Australian National University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Dunn, J. The Political Thought of John Locke. Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

du Plessis, J. ‘Corporate social responsibility and contemporary community expectations’. C&SLJ 35:30 (2017).Google Scholar

du Plessis, J. ‘Myths about Underlying Theories and Principles of Corporate Law and Other Ways of Recognising the Interests of All Stakeholders’, Annual CLTA Conference, Auckland University (4–5 February 2019).Google Scholar

du Plessis, J. ‘The Purpose of the Corporation Redefined: Recent Developments in Australia and the US’, Ross Parsons Corporate Lecture, Sydney Law School, University of Sydney (2 March 2020).Google Scholar

du Plessis, J. ‘Shareholder primacy and other stakeholder interests’. Corporate Governance, Corporate Responsibility and Law C&SLJ 3:238 (2016).Google Scholar

Elias, N. The Civilising Process. Blackwell, 2003.Google Scholar

Floridi, L. ‘The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate’. Big Data and Society (July–December 2016).Google Scholar

Floridi, L. The Ethics of Information. Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Floridi, L. ‘Four for a theory of informational privacy’. Ethics and Information Technology 8:3 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Floridi, L. ‘The logic of design as a conceptual logic of information’. Minds and Machines 27:3 (2017).Google Scholar

Floridi, L. ‘What the near future of artificial intelligence could be’. Philosophy and Technology 32 (2019).Google Scholar

Floridi, L. and Cowls, J. ‘A unified framework of five principles for AI in society’. Harvard Data Science Review, no. 1 (2019).Google Scholar

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., and Chatila, R. ‘An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles and Recommendations’. ResearchGate (November 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foucault, M. The Birth of Biopolitics. Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. Discipline and Punish. Vintage, 1979.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. Governmentality. In The Foucault Effect, Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (eds.). Harvester, 1991.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. Security, Territory, Population. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar

Fox-Decent, E. ‘Trust and Authority’, in Fiduciaries and Trust – Ethics, Politics, Economics and Law, Miller, P. and Harding, M. (eds.). Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Francis, L. and Francis, J. Privacy – What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Gaukroger, S. The Emergence of a Scientific Culture. Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Goertzel, B. and Goertzel, T. (eds.). The End of the Beginning – Life, Society and Economy on the Brink of the Singularity. Humanity+ Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Grant, D. The Mythological State and Its Empire. Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar

Grant, D. Prisons – The Continuing Crisis. Federation Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Grant, D. and Bennett Moses, L. Technology and the Trajectory of Myth. Edward Elgar, 2017.Google Scholar

Hahn, S. Lord Have Mercy – The Healing Power of Confession. Darton, Longman and Todd, 2017.Google Scholar

Harding, M. ‘Contracts, Fiduciary Relationships and Trust’, in Fiduciaries and Trust – Ethics, Politics, Economics and Law, Miller, P. and Harding, M. (eds.). Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Harding, M. ‘Responding to trust’, Ratio Juris 24:1 (2011).Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A. Law, Legislation and Liberty. Routledge, 1982.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. Being and Time. Blackwell, 1997.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Harper, 1977.Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. Leviathan. Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Hunter, I. Rival Enlightenments. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers. Ethically Aligned Design, first edition (published online).Google Scholar

Kant, I. Critique of Pure Reason. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar

Kant, I. Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Kenyon, A. and Richardson, M. New Dimensions in Privacy Law. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S. Fear and Trembling. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Krygier, M. ‘Conservative-liberal-socialism’. Symposium 11:1 (2002).Google Scholar

Krygier, M. ‘The rule of law: Pasts, presents and two possible futures’. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 12 (2016): 199–229.Google Scholar

Krygier, M. ‘Too Much Information’, in Cosmopolitan Jurisprudence: Essays in Memory of H. Patrick Glenn, Dedek, Helge (ed.). Cambridge University Press, American Society of Comparative Law Series, forthcoming 2020.Google Scholar

Krygier, M. ‘What’s the point of the rule of law?’ Buffalo Law Review 67:3 (2019).Google Scholar

Langford, R. Teele ‘Purpose-based governance: A new paradigm’. University of New South Wales Law Journal 42 (2020).Google Scholar

Lilti, A. The Invention of Celebrity. Polity, 2017.Google Scholar

Locke, J. Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Luther, M. Here I Stand. Hendricksen, 2011.Google Scholar

Madary, M. and Metzinger, T. ‘Real virtuality: A code of ethical conduct. Recommendations for the good scientific practice and the consumers of VR-technology’. Frontiers in Robotics and AI (2016). doi: 10.3389/frobt.2016.00003.Google Scholar

Matthew, C. The Nineteenth Century – The British Isles 1815–1901. Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Metzinger, T. Being No One – The Self-Model of Subjectivity. MIT Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. On Liberty. Pelican, 1974.Google Scholar

Miller, P. ‘Political (Dis)trust and Fiduciary Government’, in Fiduciaries and Trust – Ethics, Politics, Economics and Law, Miller, P. and Harding, M. (eds.). Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Minsky, M. The Emotion Machine. Simon and Schuster, 2006.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de la Brede et de. The Spirit of the Laws. Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Moore, Adam D. ‘Privacy, Neuroscience and Neuro-surveillance’. January 2020, ResearchGate.Google Scholar

Moore, Adam D. New Oxford Annotated Bible. New Standard Version with The Apocrypha. Oxford University Press, 1950.Google Scholar

Nilsson, N. The Quest for Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Nissenbaum, H. Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Ockham, W. Quodlibetal Questions, trans. Freddoso, A. J. and Kelley, E., 2 vols. Yale University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Pettit, P. Republicanism. Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Postema, G. ‘Trust, Distrust, and the Rule of Law’, in Fiduciaries and Trust – Ethics, Politics, Economics and Law, Miller, P. and Harding, M. (eds.). Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Richardson, M. The Right to Privacy. Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Rousseau, J.-J. The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings. Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Simmel, G. Georg Simmel: On Individuality and Social Forms: Selected Writings, Levine, D. (ed.). University of Chicago Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Simmel, G. ‘The Secret and the Secret Society’, in The Sociology of George Simmel, Wolff, K. (ed.). Free Press, 1950.Google Scholar

Theunissen, M. Kierkegaard’s Concept of Despair. Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Trentmann, F. Empire of Things. Penguin, 2017.Google Scholar

van Krieken, R. Norbert Elias. Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar

Yeung, K. ‘Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation’. Regulation & Governance 12 (2018).Google Scholar

Waldman, A. ‘Privacy as trust: Sharing personal information in a networked world’. University of Miami Law Review 69:559 (2015).Google Scholar

Waldron, J. ‘How law protects dignity’. The Cambridge Law Journal 71:1 (2012).Google Scholar

Waldron, J. ‘The Rule of Law and the Importance of Procedure’, in Getting to the Rule of Law, Fleming, J. (ed.). New York University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Zuboff, S. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. Profile Books, 2019.Google Scholar