Book contents
- Principles of Magnetostatics
- Principles of Magnetostatics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Basic concepts
- 2 Magnetic materials
- 3 Potential theory
- 4 Conductor-dominant transverse fields
- 5 Complex analysis of transverse fields
- 6 Iron-dominant transverse fields
- 7 Axial field configurations
- 8 Periodic magnetic channels
- 9 Permanent magnets
- 10 Time-varying fields
- 11 Numerical methods
- Appendices
- Index
- References
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core
11 - Numerical methods
Book contents
- Principles of Magnetostatics
- Principles of Magnetostatics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Basic concepts
- 2 Magnetic materials
- 3 Potential theory
- 4 Conductor-dominant transverse fields
- 5 Complex analysis of transverse fields
- 6 Iron-dominant transverse fields
- 7 Axial field configurations
- 8 Periodic magnetic channels
- 9 Permanent magnets
- 10 Time-varying fields
- 11 Numerical methods
- Appendices
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Principles of Magnetostatics , pp. 245 - 273Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Frisiani, A., Molinari, G. & Viviani, A., Introduction, in Chari, M. & Silvester, P. (eds.), Finite Elements in Electrical and Magnetic Field Problems, Wiley, 1980, p. 1–10.Google Scholar
Gershenfeld, N., The Nature of Mathematical Modeling, Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 86–91.Google Scholar
Binns, K. & Lawrenson, P., Analysis and Computation of Electric and Magnetic Field Problems, Pergamon Press, 2nd ed., 1973, p. 246.Google Scholar
Jones, D., Methods in Electromagnetic Wave Propagation, vol. 1, Oxford University Press, 1987, p. 113.Google Scholar
Smith, G., Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations: Finite Difference Methods, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, 1978, p. 216.Google Scholar
Press, W., Teukolsky, S., Vetterling, W. & Flannery, B., Numerical Recipes in Fortran, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 1992, p. 117.Google Scholar
Chari, M., Finite element solution of magnetic and electric field problems in electrical machines and devices, in Chari, M. & Silvester, P. (eds.), Finite Elements in Electrical and Magnetic Field Problems, Wiley, 1980, p. 87–107.Google Scholar
Silvester, P. & Chari, M., Finite element solution of saturable magnetic field problems, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems 89:1642, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simkin, J. & Trowbridge, C., Three dimensional nonlinear electromagnetic field computations using scalar potentials, IEE Proc. 127:368, 1980.Google Scholar
Simkin, J. & Trowbridge, C., Magnetostatic fields computed using an integral equation derived from Green’s theorems, Proc. Compumag, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Oxford, 1976, p. 5.Google Scholar
Trowbridge, C., Applications of integral equation methods to the numerical solution of magnetostatic and eddy current problems, in Chari, M. & Silvester, P. (eds.), op. cit., p. 191–213.Google Scholar
Trowbridge, C., Progress in magnet design by computer, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Magnet Technology, Brookhaven National Laboratory, 1972, p. 555.Google Scholar
McDonald, B. & Wexler, A., Mutually constrained partial differential and integral equation field formulations, in Chari, M. & Silvester, P. (eds.), op. cit., p. 161–190.Google Scholar
Newman, M., Trowbridge, C. & Turner, L., GFUN: an interactive program as an aid to magnet design, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Mag. Tech., Brookhaven National Laboratory, 1972, p. 617.Google Scholar
Mingwu, F., Hanguang, S. & Jingguo, W., Some experiences of using integral equation method to calculate magnetostatic fields, IEEE Trans. Mag. 21:2185, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winslow, A., Numerical solution of the quasilinear Poisson equation in a nonuniform triangle mesh, J.Comp. Phys. 1:149, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billen, J. & Young, L., Poisson-Superfish, Los Alamos National Laboratory report LA-UR-96–1834, 2006, p. 577–596.Google Scholar
Turner, R., A target field approach to optimal coil design, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 19:L147, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, G., Two dimensional, uniform current density, air core coil configurations for the production of specified magnetic fields, Proc. 1969 Part. Accel. Conf., Washington DC, p. 768.Google Scholar
Bleser, E., et al., Superconducting magnets for the CBA Project, Nuc. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 235:435, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar