Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:39:53.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Uncommon hepatic tumors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Hero K. Hussain
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
Isaac R. Francis
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

Although hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma comprise the majority of malignant primary hepatic carcinomas, a variety of lesions are frequently found in the liver. Common lesions such as hepatic hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and metastatic disease are well known to clinicians and have been extensively documented in the literature. However, in centers with highly active liver surgery programs, other rare neoplastic and tumor-like conditions can be seen. It is important to understand these conditions in order to guide workup and differentiate management from that of primary hepatic malignant conditions.

Angiomyolipoma

Hepatic angiomyolipoma (AML) is a mesenchymal neoplasm that contains varying amounts of three discrete histologic elements: smooth muscle cells, blood vessels, and adipose tissue. Although the presence of these three elements is considered central to the diagnosis of AML, the varying content of these components can create some diagnostic uncertainty. In fact, the lipid content seen in pathologic specimens has been reported to vary widely, which has led some researchers to subcategorize hepatic AML into four different types based on lines of differentiation and dominant tissue component: mixed, lipomatous (>70% fat), myomatous (<10% fat), and angiomatous. However, modern immunohistochemical techniques have markedly increased lesion specificity through positive staining for HMB-45 myoid cells.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Tsui, WM, Colombari, R, Portmann, BC, et al. Hepatic angiomyolipoma: A clinicopathologic study of 30 cases and delineation of unusual morphologic variants. Am J Surg Pathol 1999; 23(1): 34–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basaran, C, Karcaaltincaba, M, Akata, D, et al. Fat-containing lesions of the liver: Cross-sectional imaging findings with emphasis on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184(4): 1103–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, CY, Ho, MC, Jeng, YM, Hu, RH, Wu, YM, and Lee, PH. Management of hepatic angiomyolipoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2007; 11(4): 452–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nonomura, A, Mizukami, Y, and Kadoya, M. Angiomyolipoma of the liver: A collective review. J Gastroenterol 1994; 29: 95–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prasad, SR, Wang, H, Rosas, H, et al. Fat-containing lesions of the liver: Radiologic-pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 2005; 25(2): 321–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nonomura, A, Enomoto, Y, Takeda, M, et al. Invasive growth of hepatic angiomyolipoma; a hitherto unreported ominous histological feature. Histopathology 2006; 48(7): 831–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhong, DR and Ji, XL. Hepatic angiomyolipoma-misdiagnosis as hepatocellular carcinoma: A report of 14 cases. World J Gastroenterol 2000; 6: 608–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Fisher, A and Siegelman, ES. Body MR Techniques and MR of the Liver. In: Body MRI, 1st edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2005: 1–62.Google Scholar
De Bruecker, Y, Ballaux, F, Allewaert, S, et al. Solitary hepatic lesion: MRI-pathological correlation of an hepatic angiomyolipoma. Eur Radiol 2004; 14(7): 1324–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Braga, L, Semelka, RC, and Armao, D. Liver. In: Abdominal-Pelvic MRI, 2nd edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2006: 47–447.Google Scholar
Fukuya, T, Honda, H, Matsumata, T, et al. Diagnosis of inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver: Value of CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163(5): 1087–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogawa, T, Yokoi, H, and Kawarada, Y. A case of inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver causing elevated serum CA19–9 levels. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93(12): 2551–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamir, D, Jarchowsky, J, Singer, C, et al. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver–a rare entity and a diagnostic challenge. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93(9): 1538–40.Google Scholar
Yoon, KH, Ha, HK, Lee, JS, et al. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver in patients with recurrent pyogenic cholangitis: CT-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1999; 211(2): 373–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsou, YK, Lin, CJ, Liu, NJ, Lin, CC, Lin, CH, and Lin, SM. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver: Report of eight cases, including three unusual cases, and a literature review. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 22(12): 2143–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nam, KJ, Kang, HK, and Lim, JH. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver: CT and sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167(2): 485–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernández, JC, Alfonso, C, González, L, et al. Solid mesenchymal hamartoma in an adult: A case report. J Clin Pathol 2006; 59(5): 542–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yesim, G, Gupse, T, Zafer, U, and Ahmet, A. Mesenchymal hamartoma of the liver in adulthood: Immunohistochemical profiles, clinical and histopathological features in two patients. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2005; 12(6): 502–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bove, KE, Blough, RI, and Soukup, S. Third report of t(19q)(13,4) in mesenchymal hamartoma of liver with comments on link to embryonal sarcoma. Pediatr Dev Pathol 1998; 1: 438–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, KA, Kim, KW, Park, SH, et al. Unusual mesenchymal liver tumors in adults: Radiologic-pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187(5): W481–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mortelé, B, Mortelé, K, Seynaeve, P, Vandevelde, D, Kunnen, M, and Ros, PR. Hepatic bile duct hamartomas (von Meyenburg complexes): MR and MR cholangiography findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002; 26(3): 438–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lev-Toaff, AS, Bach, AM, Wechsler, RJ, Hilpert, PL, Gatalica, Z, and Rubin, R. The radiologic and pathologic spectrum of biliary hamartomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165(2): 309–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wohlgemuth, WA, Böttger, J, and Bohndorf, K. MRI, CT, US and ERCP in the evaluation of bile duct hamartomas (von Meyenburg complex): A case report. Eur Radiol 1998; 8(9): 1623–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maher, MM, Dervan, P, Keogh, B, and Murray, JG. Bile duct hamartomas (von Meyenburg complexes): Value of MR imaging in diagnosis. Abdom Imaging 1999; 24(2): 171–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinoli, C, Cittadini, G, Rollandi, GA, and Conzi, R. Case report: Imaging of bile duct hamartomas. Clin Radiol 1992; 43: 203–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tohmé-Noun, C, Cazals, D, Noun, R, Menassa, L, Valla, D, and Vilgrain, V. Multiple biliary hamartomas: Magnetic resonance features with histopathologic correlation. Eur Radiol 2008; 18(3): 493–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makhlouf, HR, Ishak, KG, and Goodman, ZD. Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the liver: A clinicopathologic study of 137 cases. Cancer 1999; 85(3): 562–82.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyburn, ID, Torreggiani, WC, Harris, AC, et al. Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: Sonographic, CT, and MR imaging appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180(5): 1359–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Economopoulos, N, Kelekis, NL, Argentos, S, et al. Bright-dark ring sign in MR imaging of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27(4): 908–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewin, M, Mourra, N, Honigman, I, et al. Assessment of MRI and MRCP in diagnosis of biliary cystadenoma and cystadenocarcinoma. Eur Radiol 2006; 16(2): 407–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horton, KM, Bluemke, DA, Hruban, RH, Soyer, P, and Fishman, EK. CT and MR imaging of benign hepatic and biliary tumors. RadioGraphics 1999; 19(2): 431–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buetow, PC, Buck, JL, Pantongrag-Brown, L, et al. Biliary cystadenoma and cystadenocarcinoma: Clinical-imaging-pathologic correlations with emphasis on the importance of ovarian stroma. Radiology 1995; 196(3): 805–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×