Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T02:19:37.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Staging of cholangiocarcinoma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

By
Hero K. Hussain  and
James A. Knol
Edited by
Hero K. Hussain  and
Isaac R. Francis
Hero K. Hussain
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
Isaac R. Francis
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

The goal of diagnostic staging of cholangiocarcinoma is to evaluate resectability and extent of surgery, because surgery is the only curative therapy. Cure and long-term survival can be achieved if the tumor is completely excised and the histologic margins are negative.

Staging of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is performed using contrast-enhanced MRI or CT. The extent and number of tumor nodules, associated portal vein narrowing or occlusion, and the presence of lymph node and distant metastasis are important determinants of survival after surgery.

Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is more challenging and may require more than one imaging modality for staging. Extrahepatic tumors are classified according to their anatomical location into perihilar (Klatskin) and distal tumors. Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is typically located in the extrahepatic duct proximal to the insertion of the cystic duct. Distal tumors arise anywhere from below the confluence of the cystic duct with the common bile duct to the ampulla of Vater. In this chapter, we focus on the staging and preoperative evaluation of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Perihilar extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

The preoperative evaluation of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma must address four critical determinants of resectability:

  1. Extent of tumor within the biliary tree,

  2. Vascular invasion,

  3. Hepatic lobar atrophy, and

  4. Metastatic disease

In the absence of metastatic disease, the location and extent of tumor spread along the bile ducts will determine whether it can be completely excised.

Type
Chapter
Information
Primary Carcinomas of the Liver , pp. 160 - 176
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Jarnagin, WR. Cholangiocarcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts. Semin Surg Oncol 2000; 19: 156–76.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, YE, Kim, MJ, Park, YN, Lee, YH, and Choi, JY. Staging of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 2182–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okabayashi, T, Yamamoto, J, Kosuge, T, et al. A new staging system for mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Analysis of preoperative and postoperative variables. Cancer 2001; 92: 2374–83.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morimoto, Y, Tanak, Y, Ito, T, et al. Long-term survival and prognostic factors in the surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2003; 10: 432–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, SA, Thomas, HC, Davidson, BR, and Taylor-Robinson, SD. Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet 2005; 366: 1303–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
deGroen, PC, Gores, GJ, LaRusso, NF, Gunderson, LL, and Nagorney, DM. Biliary tract cancers. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1368–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakeeb, A, Pitt, HA, Sohn, TA, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma. A spectrum of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors. Ann Surg 1996; 224: 463–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeOliveira, ML, Cunningham, SC, Cameron, JL, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma: Thirty-one–year experience with 564 patients at a single institution. Ann Surg 2007; 245: 755–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, FL, Page, DL, Fleming, ID, et al. eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Sixth edn. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002.CrossRef
Nishio, H, Nagino, M, Oda, K, Ebata, T, Arai, T, and Nimura, Y. TNM classification for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: Comparison between 5th and 6th editions of the AJCC/UICC staging systems. Arch Surg 2005; 390: 319–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bismuth, H, Nakache, R, and Diamond, T. Management strategies in resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 1992; 215(1): 31–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bismuth, H and Corlette, MB. Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1975; 140(2): 170–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Tsao, JI, Nimura, Y, Kamiya, J, et al. Management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Comparison of an American and a Japanese experience. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 166–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyama, Y and Makuuch, M. Current surgical treatment of bile duct cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 1505–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gulik, TM and Gouma, DJ. Changing perspectives in the assessment of resectability of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14: 1969–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, HY, Kim, SH, Lee, JM, et al. Preoperative assessment of resectability of hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Combined CT and cholangiography with revised criteria. Radiology 2006; 239: 113–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bold, RJ and Goddnigh, JEHilar cholangiocarcinoma: Surgical and endoscopic approaches. Surg Clin North Am 2004; 84: 525–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, JH, Jang, KT, Choi, D, Lee, WJ, and Lim, HK. Early bile duct carcinoma: Comparison of imaging features with pathologic findings. Radiology 2006; 238: 542–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hong, SM, Kang, GH, Lee, HY, and Ro, JY. Smooth muscle distribution in the extrahepatic bile duct: Histologic and immunohistochemical studies of 122 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2000; 24: 660–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hong, SM, Presley, AE, Stelow, EB, Frierson, HF, and Moskaluk, CA. Reconsiderations of the histologic definitions used in the pathologic staging of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2006; 30: 744–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, SM, Cho, H, Moskaluk, CA, and Yu, E. Measurement of the invasion depth of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma: An alternative method overcoming the current T classification problems of the AJCC staging system. Am J Surg Pathol 2007; 31: 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, SM, Kim, MJ, Pi, DY, et al. Analysis of extrahepatic bile duct carcinomas according to the new American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System focused on tumor classification problems in 222 patients. Cancer 2005; 104: 802–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burke, EC, Jarnagin, WR, Hochwald, SN, et al. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Patterns of spread, the importance of hepatic resection for curative operation, and a presurgical clinical staging system. Ann Surg 1998; 228: 385–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainani, NI, Catalano, OA, Holalkere, NS, Zhu, AX, Hahn, PF, and Sahani, DV. Cholangiocarcinoma: Current and novel imaging techniques. RadioGraphics 2008; 28(5): 1263–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otto, G, Romaneehsen, B, Hoppe-Lotichius, M, and Bittinger, F. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Resectability and radicality after routine diagnostic imaging. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2004; 11: 310–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masselli, G and Gualdi, G. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: MRI/MRCP in staging and treatment planning. Abdom Imaging 2008; 33: 444–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vilgrain, V. Staging cholangiocarcinoma by imaging studies. HPB 2008; 10: 106–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bilbao, MK, Dotter, CT, Lee, TG, et al. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterology 1976; 70: 314–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Szklaruk, J, Tamm, E, and Charnsangavej, C. Preoperative imaging of biliary tract cancers. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 2002; 11(4): 865–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manfredi, R, Masselli, G, Maresca, G, Brizi, MG, Vecchioli, A, and Marano, P. MR imaging and MRCP of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Abdom Imaging 2003; 28: 319–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, SS, Kim, MH, Lee, SK, et al. MR cholangiography versus cholangioscopy for evaluation of longitudinal extension of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56(1): 25–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munoz, L, Roayaie, S, Maman, D, et al. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma involving the portal vein bifurcation: Long term results after resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2002; 9: 237–41.Google ScholarPubMed
Neuhaus, P, Jonas, S, Bechstein, WO, et al. Extended resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 1999; 230: 808–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lall, CG, Howard, TJ, Skandarajah, A, DeWitt, JM, Aisen, AM, and Sandrasegaran, K. New concepts in staging and treatment of locally advanced pancreatic head cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: 1044–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, SA, Davidson, BR, Goldin, R, et al. British Society of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: Consensus document. Gut 2002; 51(Suppl 6): VI1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soyer, P, Bluemke, DA, Reichle, R, et al. Imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: 2. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165(6): 1433–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roche, CJ, Hughes, ML, Garvey, CJ, et al. CT and pathologic assessment of prospective nodal staging in patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 475–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, CD, Rice, MH, Pinson, CW, Chapman, WC, Chari, RS, and Delbeke, D. Fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging in the evaluation of gallbladder carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2004; 8: 90–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fong, Y, Blumgart, LH, Lin, E, et al. Outcome of treatment for distal bile duct cancer. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 1712–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeo, CJ, Cameron, Jl, Sohn, TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990's: Pathology, complications and outcomes. Ann Surg 1997; 226: 248–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, TP, Prasad, CN, Virgo, KS, and Johnson, FE. Experience with distal bile duct cancers in the U.S. Veterans Affairs hospitals: 1987–1991. J Surg Oncol 1997; 64: 242–5.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tompkins, RK, Thomas, D, Wile, A, and Longmire, WP. Prognostic factors in bile duct carcinoma. Analysis of 96 cases. Ann Surg 1981; 194: 447–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, BA, Langer, B, Taylor, BR, and Girotti, M. Periampullary tumors: Which ones should be resected?Am J Surg 1985; 149: 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, ME. Cytologic brushings of ductal lesions during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 139–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagorney, DM, Donohue, JH, Farnell, MB, et al. Outcomes after curative resections of cholangiocarcinoma. Arch Surg 1993; 128: 8710–879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masselli, G, Manfredi, R, Vecchioli, A, and Gualdi, G. MR imaging and MR cholangiography in the preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Correlation with surgical and pathologic findings. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 2213–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, HS, Lee, JM, Choi, JY, et al. Preoperative evaluation of bile duct cancer: MRI combined with MR cholangiography versus MDCT with direct cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190: 396–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanderveen, KA and Hussain, HK. Magnetic resonance imaging of cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Imaging 2004; 4: 104–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, HJ, Kim, AY, Hing, SS, et al. Biliary ductal evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Three-dimensional direct multi-detector row CT cholangiographic findings versus surgical and pathologic results – Feasibility study. Radiology 2006; 238: 300–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×