Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-8cg97 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-21T15:01:15.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 6 - Intrapartum/Delivery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2025

Peter F. Schnatz
Affiliation:
The Reading Hospital, Pennsylvania
D. Yvette LaCoursiere
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Christopher M. Morosky
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut School of Medicine
Jonathan Schaffir
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University College of Medicine
Vanessa Torbenson
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine
David Chelmow
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth School of Medicine
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Pregnancy Complications
A Case-Based Approach
, pp. 141 - 192
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Clinical Guidance for Integration of the Findings of the ARRIVE Trial: Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. Practice Advisory August 2018. www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-advisory/articles/2018/08/clinical-guidance-for-integration-of-the-findings-of-the-arrive-trial (accessed October 11, 2024).Google Scholar
Ayala, NK, Rouse, DJ. Failed Induction of Labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024;230(3S):S769S774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.103 (accessed October 11, 2024)Google ScholarPubMed
Cohen, WR, Friedman, EA. The Latent Phase of Labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5):S1017S1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.029 (accessed October 11, 2024).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grobman, WA, Rice, MM, Reddy, UM, et al.; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:513523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grobman, WA, Bailit, J, Lai, Y, et al.; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Defining Failed Induction of Labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(1):122.e1122.e8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.556 (accessed October 11, 2024).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obstetric Care Consensus No. 1: Safe Prevention of the Primary Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(3):693–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of Labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:386–397.Google Scholar

References

Friedman, EA, Sachtleben, MR. Dysfunctional Labor: I. Prolonged Latent Phase in the Nullipara. Obstet Gynecol. 1961;17:135148.Google ScholarPubMed
Greulich, B, Tarrant, B. The Latent Phase of Labor: Diagnosis and Management. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007;52:190198.Google ScholarPubMed
Friedman, EA, Cohen, WR. Dysfunctional Labor and Delivery: Adverse Effects on Offspring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228:S1104S1109.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhang, J, Landy, HJ, Branch, DW, et al.; Consortium on Safe Labor. Contemporary Patterns of Spontaneous Labor with Normal Neonatal Outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:12811287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 766: Approaches to Limit Intervention during Labor and Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e164–e173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obstetric Care Consensus No. 1: Safe Prevention of the Primary Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:693–711.Google Scholar
Spong, CY, Berghella, V, Wenstrom, KD, et al. Preventing the First Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:11811193.Google ScholarPubMed

References

Obstetric Care Consensus No. 1: Safe Prevention of the Primary Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:693–711.Google Scholar
Zhang, J, Landy, HJ, Ware Branch, D, et al. Contemporary Patterns of Spontaneous Labor with Normal Neonatal Outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(6):12811287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashwal, E, Livne, MY, Benichou, JIC, et al. Contemporary Patterns of Labor in Nulliparous and Multiparous Women [published correction appears in Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(6):918]. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(3):267.e1267.e9.Google ScholarPubMed
Friedman, EA, Cohen, WR. The Active Phase of Labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5S):S1037S1049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 766 Summary: Approaches to Limit Intervention during Labor and Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):406–408.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, SJ, Garrison, E, Fairbrother, E. Normal Labor and Delivery. In: Gabbe’s Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies, 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2021, 204225.e4.Google Scholar
Spong, CY, Berghella, V, Wenstrom, KD, Mercer, BM, Saade, GR. Preventing the First Cesarean Delivery: Summary of a Joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(5):11811193.Google Scholar
Rouse, DJ, Owen, J, Hauth, JC. Active-Phase Labor Arrest: Oxytocin Augmentation for at Least 4 Hours. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(3):323328.Google ScholarPubMed
Wood, S, Skiffington, J, Brant, R, et al. The REDUCED Trial: A Cluster Randomized Trial for REDucing the Utilization of CEsarean Delivery for Dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5S):S1095S1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govindappagari, S, Greene, N, Burwick, R, Wong, M, Gregory, K. Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity after 4 and 6 Hours of Protracted Active Labor in Nulliparous Term Pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(1):185193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Practice Bulletin No. 221: External Cephalic Version. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135:e203–e212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Hundt, M, Velzel, J, de Groot, C, et al. Mode of Delivery after Successful External Cephalic Version: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:13271334.Google Scholar
Hofmeyr, GJ, Hannah, M, Lawrie, TA. Planned Caesarean Section for Term Breech Delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:CD000166.Google Scholar
Hannah, ME, Hannah, WJ, Hewson, SA, et al.; Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Planned Caesarean Section versus Planned Vaginal Birth for Breech Presentation at Term: A Randomized Multicentre Trial. Lancet. 2000;356:13751383.Google Scholar
Committee Opinion No. 745: Mode of Term Singleton Breech Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:e60–e63.Google Scholar
Magro-Malosso, ER, Saccone, G, Tommasco, MD, et al. Nuraxial Analgesia to Increase the Success Rate of External Cephalic Version: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:276286.Google ScholarPubMed
Bjellmo, S, Andersen, GL, Martinussen, MP. Is Vaginal Breech Delivery Associated with Higher Risk for Perinatal Death and Cerebral Palsy Compared with Vaginal Cephalic Birth? Registry-Based Cohort Study in Norway. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e014979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernández-Carrasco, FJ, Cristóbal-Cañadas, D, Gómez-Salgado, J, et al. Maternal and Fetal Risks of Planned Vaginal Breech Delivery vs Planned Caesarean Section for Term Breech Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2022;12:04055.Google ScholarPubMed
Casteels, M, Podevyn, K, Vanoverschelde, H, et al. Implementation of a Breech Program in a Belgian Obstetric Team. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;158:432438.Google Scholar

References

Kesavan, M. Management of Brow, Face, and Compound Malpresentations. SASGOG Pearls of Exxcellence. www.exxcellence.org/list-of-pearls/management-of-brow-face-and-compound-malpresentations/?categoryName=&searchTerms=&featured=False (accessed June 13, 2023.)Google Scholar
Makajeva, J, Ashraf, M. Delivery, Face and Brow Presentation. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK567727/ (accessed June 13, 2023).Google Scholar
Pilliod, RA, Caughey, AB. Fetal Malpresentation and Malposition: Diagnosis and Management. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017;44(4):631643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2017.08.003 (accessed October 13, 2024).Google ScholarPubMed

References

Committee Opinion No. 712: Intrapartum Management of Intraamniotic Infection. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(2):e95–e101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, E, Romero, R, Manaphat, S, et al. Clinical Chorioamnionitis due to Intraamniotic Infection in Term Gestations: The Definition, Microbiology, Pathogenesis, Differential Diagnosis and Treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024;230(3):S807S840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conde-Agudelo, A, Romero, R, Jung, EJ, Garcia Sánchez, ÁJ. Management of Clinical Chorioamnionitis: An Evidence-Based Approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(6):848869.Google ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, R, Dinsmoor, M, Newton, E, Ramamurthy, R. A Randomized Trial of Intrapartum versus Immediate Postpartum Treatment of Women with Intra-amniotic Infection. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;72(6):823828.Google ScholarPubMed
Goetzl, L. Maternal Fever in Labor: Etiologies, Consequences, and Clinical Management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5S):S1274S1282.Google ScholarPubMed
Rouse, DJ, Landon, M, Leveno, KJ, et al. The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Cesarean Registry: Chorioamnionitis at Term and Its Duration-Relationship to Outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(1):211216.Google ScholarPubMed

References

Baskett, TF. Operative Vaginal Delivery: An Historical Perspective. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;56:310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.08.002 (accessed October 13, 2024).Google ScholarPubMed
Barth, WH Jr. Persistent Occiput Posterior. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(3):695709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000647 (accessed October 13, 2024).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osterman, MJK, Hamilton, BE, Martin, JA, Driscoll, AK, Valenzuela, CP. Births: Final Data for 2021. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2023;72(1):153.Google ScholarPubMed
Operative Vaginal Birth: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 219. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(4):e149–e159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muraca, GM, Boutin, A, Razaz, N, et al. Maternal and Neonatal Trauma Following Operative Vaginal Delivery. CMAJ. 2022;194(1):E1E12.Google ScholarPubMed
Panelli, DM, Leonard, SA, Joudi, N, et al. Clinical and Physician Factors Associated with Failed Operative Vaginal Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2023;141(6):1181.Google ScholarPubMed
Patient Safety and Quality Committee; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine; Staat, B, Combs, CA. SMFM Special Statement: Operative Vaginal Delivery: Checklists for Performance and Documentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(5):B15B21.Google ScholarPubMed
Merriam, AA, Ananth, CV, Wright, JD, et al. Trends in Operative Vaginal Delivery, 2005–2013: A Population-Based Study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;124(9):13651372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Obstetrics and Gynecology Case Logs: National Data Report 2023. https://apps.acgme-i.org/ads/Public/Reports/Report/25 (accessed October 28, 2023).Google Scholar

References

Bloch, C, Dore, S, Hobson, S. Committee Opinion No. 415: Impacted Fetal Head, Second-Stage Cesarean Delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021;43(3):406413.Google ScholarPubMed
Wyn Jones, N, Mitchell, EJ, Wakefield, N, et al. Impacted Fetal Head during Second Stage Caesarean Birth: A Prospective Observational Study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;272:7781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornthwaite, K, Draycott, T, Bahl, R, Hotton, E, Winter, C, Lenguerrand, E. Impacted Fetal Head: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Emergency Caesarean Section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;261:8591.Google Scholar
Allen, VM, O’Connell, CM, Baskett, TF. Maternal and Perinatal Morbidity of Caesarean Delivery at Full Cervical Dilatation Compared with Caesarean Delivery in the First Stage of Labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112(7):986990.Google ScholarPubMed
Hanley, SJ, Walker, KF, Wakefield, N, et al. Managing an Impacted Fetal Head at Caesarean Section: A UK Survey of Healthcare Professionals and Parents. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;271:8892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landesman, R, Graber, EA. Abdominovaginal Delivery: Modification of the Cesarean Section Operation to Facilitate Delivery of the Impacted Head. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;148(6):707710.Google ScholarPubMed
Saha, PK, Gulati, R, Goel, P, Tandon, R, Huria, A. Second Stage Caesarean Section: Evaluation of Patwardhan Technique. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(1):9395.Google ScholarPubMed
Gq Peak, A, Barwise, E, Walker, KF. Techniques for managing an Impacted Fetal Head at Caesarean Section: A Systematic Review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023;281:1222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waterfall, H, Grivell, RM, Dodd, JM. Techniques for Assisting Difficult Delivery at Caesarean Section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(1):CD004944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, JB, Tolcher, MC, Chandraharan, E, Rose, CH. Delivery of an Impacted Fetal Head during Cesarean: A Literature Review and Proposed Management Algorithm. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2015;70(11):719724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Bligard, KH, Durst, JK, Stout, MJ, et al. Risk Factors and Maternal Morbidity Associated with Unintentional Hysterotomy Extension at the Time of Cesarean Delivery. Am J Perinatol. 2019;36:10541059.Google ScholarPubMed
de la Torre, L, González-Quintero, VH, Mayor-Lynn, K, et al. Significance of Accidental Extensions in the Lower Uterine Segment during Cesarean Delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:46.Google ScholarPubMed
Sung, JF, Daniels, KI, Brodzinsky, L, et al. Cesarean Delivery Outcomes after a Prolonged Second Stage of Labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:e15.Google ScholarPubMed
Patel, SS, Koelper, NC, Srinivas, SK, et al. Adverse Maternal Outcomes Associated with Uterine Extensions at the Time of Cesarean Delivery. Am J Perinatol. 2019;36:785789.Google ScholarPubMed
Saad, AF, Rahman, M, Costantine, MM, Saade, GR. Blunt versus Sharp Uterine Incision Expansion during Low Transverse Cesarean Delivery: A Meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;6:e1e11.Google Scholar
Pergialiotis, V, Mitsopoulou, D, Biliou, E, et al. Cephalad-Caudad versus Transverse Blunt Expansion of the Low Transverse Hysterotomy during Cesarean Delivery Decreases Maternal Morbidity: A Meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225:e1e13.Google ScholarPubMed
Management of Obstetrical Hemorrhage. In: Cunningham, F, Leveno, KJ, Dashe, JS, et al. (eds). Williams Obstetrics, 26th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2022.Google Scholar
Broad Ligament Haematoma. In: Sharma, A (ed.). Labour Room Emergencies. New York: Springer; 2020. 395402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendel, PJ. Management of Broad Ligament Extension and Hematoma during a Cesarean Delivery. SASGOG Pearls of Exxcellence. https://exxcellence.org/list-of-pearls/management-of-broad-ligament-extension-and-hematoma-during-a-cesarean-delivery/ (accessed October 13, 2024).Google Scholar

References

Wei, G, Harley, F, O’Callaghan, M, et al. Systematic Review of Urological Injury during Caesarean Section and Hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34:371389.Google ScholarPubMed
Tarney, CM. Bladder Injury during Cesarean Delivery. Curr Womens Health Rev. 2013;9(2):7076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silver, RM, Landon, MB, Rouse, DJ, et al. Maternal Morbidity Associated with Multiple Repeat Cesarean Deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):12261232.Google ScholarPubMed
Blackwell, RH, Kirshenbaum, EJ, Shah, AS, et al. Complications of Recognized and Unrecognized Iatrogenic Ureteral Injury at Time of Hysterectomy: A Population Based Analysis. J Urol. 2018;199(6):15401545.Google ScholarPubMed
Jackson, LA, Ramirez, DM, Carrick, KS, et al. Gross and Histologic Anatomy of the Pelvic Ureter: Clinical Applications to Pelvic Surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(5):896904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zelivianskaia, AS, Bradley, SE, Morozov, VV. Best Practices for Repair of Iatrogenic Bladder Injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol Glob Rep. 2022;2:100062.Google ScholarPubMed
Scaglione, MA, Allshouse, AA, Canfield, DR, et al. Prophylactic Ureteral Stent Placement and Urinary Injury during Hysterectomy for Placenta Accreta Spectrum. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;140(5):806811.Google ScholarPubMed
Dahlke, JD, Mendez-Figueroa, H, Maggio, L, et al. The Case for Standardizing Cesarean Delivery Technique: Seeing the Forest for the Trees. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(5):972980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahlke, JD, Mendez-Figueroa, H, Rouse, DJ, et al. Evidence-Based Surgery for Cesarean Delivery: An Updated Systematic Review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(4):294306.Google ScholarPubMed
Sharp, HT, Adelman, MD. Prevention, Recognition, and Management of Urologic Injuries during Gynecologic Surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(6):10851096.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 198: Prevention and Management of Obstetric Lacerations at Vaginal Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(3):e87e102.Google Scholar
Yeomans, E, Hoffman, B, Gilstrap, L, Cunningham, G (eds.). Cunningham and Gilstrap’s Operative Obstetrics, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2017.Google Scholar
Groutz, A, Hasson, J, Wengier, A, et al. Third- and Fourth-Degree Perineal Tears: Prevalence and Risk Factors in the Third Millennium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:347.e1347.e4.Google ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Management of Third- and Fourth-Degree Perineal Tears: Green-top Guideline No. 29. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2015.Google Scholar
Hale, R, Ling, F. Episiotomy: Procedure and Repair Techniques, 1st ed. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2007.Google Scholar
Fernando, RJ, Sultan, AH, Kettle, C, Thakar, R. Methods of Repair for Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(12):CD002866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okeahialam, N, Wong, K, Thakar, R, et al. The Incidence of Wound Complications Following Primary Repair of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(2):182191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buppasiri, P, Lumbiganon, P, Thinkhamrop, J, Thinkhamrop, B. Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Third- and Fourth-Degree Perineal Tear during Vaginal Birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(10):CD005125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jha, S, Parker, V. Risk Factors for Recurrent Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury (rOASI): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(6):849857.Google ScholarPubMed

References

The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Calculator. https://mfmunetwork.bsc.gwu.edu/web/mfmunetwork/vaginal-birth-after-cesarean-calculator (accessed November 12, 2023).Google Scholar
Thompson, BB, Reddy, UM, Burn, M, et al. Maternal Outcomes in Pregnancies after Classical Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;140:212.Google ScholarPubMed
Gibbins, KJ, Weber, T, Holmgren, CM, et al. Maternal and Fetal Morbidity Associated with Uterine Rupture of the Unscarred Uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:382.e1.Google ScholarPubMed
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e110–e127.Google Scholar
Rozenberg, P, Sénat, MV, Deruelle, P, et al.; Groupe de Recherche en Obstétrique et Gynécologie. Evaluation of the Usefulness of Ultrasound Measurement of the Lower Uterine Segment before Delivery of Women with a Prior Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(2):253.e1253.e9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craver Pryor, E, Mertz, HL, Beaver, BW, et al. Intrapartum Predictors of Uterine Rupture. Am J Perinatol. 2007;24:317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wen, SW, Huang, L, Liston, R, et al. Severe Maternal Morbidity in Canada, 1991–2001. CMAJ. 2005;173:759.Google ScholarPubMed
Bujold, E, Gauthier, RJ. Neonatal Morbidity Associated with Uterine Rupture: What Are the Risk Factors? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmgren, C, Scott, JR, Porter, TF, et al. Uterine Rupture with Attempted Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Delivery: Decision-to-Delivery Time and Neonatal Outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Panchal, AR, Bartos, JA, Cabanas, JG et al. Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020;142(16 Suppl. 2):S366S468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, M, Hejjaji, V, Tang, Y, et al. Survival Outcomes and Resuscitation Process Measures in Maternal In-hospital Cardiac Arrest. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226:401.e1401.e10.Google ScholarPubMed
Jeejeebhoy, FM, Zelop, CM, Lipman, S, et al. Cardiac Arrest in Pregnancy: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;132:17471773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kikuchi, J, Deering, S. Cardiac Arrest in Pregnancy. Semin Perinatol. 2018;42:3338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Einav, S, Kaufman, N, Sela, HY. Maternal Cardiac Arrest and Perimortem Caesarean Delivery: Evidence or Expert-Based? Resuscitation. 2012;83:11911200.Google ScholarPubMed
ACOG Practice Bulletin 212: Pregnancy and Heart Disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e320–e56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee Opinion No. 590: Preparing for Clinical Emergencies in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(3):722–725.Google Scholar
American Heart Association Advanced Life Support (ALS): Maternal Cardiac Arrest Module. https://shopcpr.heart.org/als-maternal-cardiac-arrest-module (accessed July 1, 2023).Google Scholar
Shields, A, Vidosh, J, Kavanagh, L, Nielsen, P, Thomson, B. Obstetric Life Support Manual. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2024.Google Scholar

References

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 211: Critical Care in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(5):e303–e319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 212: Pregnancy and Heart Disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(5):e320–e356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeejeebhoy, FM, Zelop, CM, Windrim, R, et al. Management of Cardiac Arrest in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. Resuscitation. 2011;82(7):801809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeejeebhoy, FM, Zelop, CM, Lipman, S, et al.; American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee, Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation, Council on Cardiovascular Diseases in the Young, and Council on Clinical Cardiology. Cardiac Arrest in Pregnancy: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;132(18):17471773.Google ScholarPubMed
Enomoto, N, Yamashita, T, Furuta, M, et al.; Japan Resuscitation Council Maternal task Force. Effect of Maternal Positioning during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):159.Google ScholarPubMed
Lipman, S, Cohen, S, Einav, S, et al. The Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Consensus Statement on the Management of Cardiac Arrest in Pregnancy. Anesth Analg. 2014;118(5):10031016.Google Scholar
Katz, VL, Dotters, DJ, Droegemueller, W. Perimortem Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68(4):571576.Google ScholarPubMed
Katz, V, Balderston, K, DeFreest, M. Perimortem Cesarean Delivery: Were Our Assumptions Correct? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(6):19161920; discussion 1920–1921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, CH, Faksh, A, Traynor, KD, et al. Challenging the 4- to 5-Minute Rule: From Perimortem Cesarean to Resuscitative Hysterotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(5):653656, 653.e1.Google ScholarPubMed

References

Wendel, MP, Shnaekel, KL, Magann, EF. Uterine Inversion: A Review of a Life-Threatening Obstetrical Emergency. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2018;73:411417.Google ScholarPubMed
Peña-Martí, GE, Comunián-Carrasco, G. Fundal Pressure versus Controlled Cord Traction as Part of the Active Management of the Third Stage of Labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(4):CD005462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You, WB, Zahn, CM. Postpartum Hemorrhage: Abnormally Adherent Placenta, Uterine Inversion, and Puerperal Hematomas. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49:184197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sumikura, H, Inada, E. Uterotonics and Tocolytics for Anesthesiologists. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016;29:282287.Google ScholarPubMed
Majd, HS, Pilsniak, A, Reginald, P. Recurrent Uterine Inversion: A Novel Treatment Approach Using SOS Bakri Balloon. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;116:9991001.Google Scholar
Baskett, TF. Acute Uterine Inversion: A Review of 40 Cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002;24(12):953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Perlman, N, Carusi, DA. Retained Placenta after Vaginal Delivery: Risk Factors and Management. Int J Womens Health. 2019;11:527534.Google Scholar
Favilli, A, Tosto, V, Ceccobelli, M, et al. Risk Factors for Non-adherent Retained Placenta after Vaginal Delivery: A Systematic Review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric Care Consensus No. 7: Placenta Accreta Spectrum. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:e259e275.Google Scholar
Nikolajsen, S, Lokkegaard, ECL, Bergholt, T. Reoccurrence of Retained Placenta at Vaginal Delivery: An Observational Study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92:421425.Google ScholarPubMed
Frolova, AI, Stout, MJ, Tuuli, MG, et al. Duration of the Third Stage of Labor and Risk of Postpartum Hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(5):951956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 183: Postpartum Hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:e168e186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, H, Mitra, A, Rosen, T, et al. Pharmacologic Intervention for the Management of Retained Placenta: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(3):447.e1447.e19.Google ScholarPubMed
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Intrapartum Care for Healthy Women and Babies. Clinical Guideline. CG190. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190/resources/intrapartum-care-for-healthy-women-and-babies-pdf-35109866447557 (accessed June 8, 2023).Google Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines for the Management of Postpartum Hemorrhage and Retained Placenta. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44171 (accessed June 8, 2023).Google Scholar
Krapp, M, Baschat, AA, Hankeln, M, Gembruch, U. Gray Scale and Color Doppler Sonography in the Third Stage of Labor for Early Detection of Failed Placental Separation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;15:138142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Ouzounian, JG. Shoulder Dystocia: Incidence and Risk Factors. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;59(4):791794.Google ScholarPubMed
Practice Bulletin No 178: Shoulder Dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 2017;129:e123–e133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Shoulder Dystocia: Green-top Guideline No. 42. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2012.Google Scholar
Al-Hawash, S, Whitehead, CL, Farine, D. Risk of Recurrent Shoulder Dystocia: Are We Any Closer to Prediction? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(17):29282934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Athukorala, C, Middleton, P, Crowther, CA. Intrapartum Interventions for Preventing Shoulder Dystocia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD005543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macrosomia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 216. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135:e18–e35.Google Scholar
Hoffman, MK, Bailit, JL, Ware Branch, D, et al. A Comparison of Obstetric Maneuvers for the Acute Management of Shoulder Dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(6):12721278.Google ScholarPubMed
Leung, TY, Stuart, O, Suen, SS, et al. Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes of Shoulder Dystocia Alleviated by Different Type and Sequence of Manoeuvres: A Retrospective Review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;118(8):985990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, DA, Lense, J, Roepcke, F. Shoulder Dystocia: Managing an Obstetric Emergency. Am Fam Physician. 2020;102(2):8490.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×