Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-qhdkw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-17T06:06:30.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 2 - Antepartum (Mid-trimester)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2025

Peter F. Schnatz
Affiliation:
The Reading Hospital, Pennsylvania
D. Yvette LaCoursiere
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Christopher M. Morosky
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut School of Medicine
Jonathan Schaffir
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University College of Medicine
Vanessa Torbenson
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine
David Chelmow
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth School of Medicine
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Pregnancy Complications
A Case-Based Approach
, pp. 37 - 60
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No.142: Cerclage for the Management of Cervical Insufficiency. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:372379.Google Scholar
Kiwi, R, Neuman, MR, Merkatz, IR, et al. Determination of the Elastic Properties of the Cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;71:568574.Google ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No.234: Prediction and Prevention of Spontaneous Preterm Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;138:e6590.Google Scholar
Saccone, G, Ciardulli, A, Xodo, S, et al. Cervical Pessary for Preventing Preterm Birth in Singleton Pregnancies with Short Cervical Length: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36(8):1535.Google ScholarPubMed
Shennan, AH, Story, L; Royal College of Obstetricians, Gynaecologists. Cervical Cerclage: Green-Top Guideline No. 75. BJOG. 2022;129:11781210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Dijk, CE, Breuking, SH, Jansen, S, et al. Perioperative Complications of a Transvaginal Cervical Cerclage in Singleton Pregnancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5):521534.Google ScholarPubMed

References

Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 175: Ultrasound in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(6):e241e256.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics, Committee on Genetics, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 226. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(4):e48e69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, UM, Abuhamad, AZ, Levine, D, et al. Fetal Imaging: Executive Summary of a Joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Fetal Imaging Workshop. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:10701082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, SY, Shaw, SW, Cheuh, HY, et al. Intracardiac Echogenic Focus and Trisomy 21 in a Population Previously Evaluated by First-Trimester Combined Screening. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(8):10171023.Google Scholar
Whitlow, BJ, Lazanakis, ML, Kadir, RA, et al. The Significance of Choroid Plexus Cysts, Echogenic Heart Foci and Renal Pyelectasis in the First Trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12(6):385390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agathokleous, M, Chaveeva, P, Poon, LC, et al. Meta-analysis of Second-Trimester Markers for Trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(3):247261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyberg, DA, Souter, VL, El-Bastawissi, A, et al. Isolated Sonographic Markers for Detection of Fetal Down Syndrome in the Second Trimester of Pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med. 2001;20:10531063.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Prabhu, M, Kuller, JA, et al. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #57: Evaluation and Management of Isolated Soft Ultrasound Markers for Aneuploidy in the Second Trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225(4):B2B15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aagaard-Tillery, KM, Malone, FD, Nyberg, DA, et al. First and Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk Research Consortium. Role of Second-Trimester Genetic Sonography after Down Syndrome Screening. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:11891196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Adnexal Torsion in Adolescents: ACOG Committee Opinion No, 783. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(2):e56–e63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, JP, Price, RP, Tonkin, AE, et al. SAGES Guidelines for the Use of Laparoscopy during Pregnancy. May 2017. www.sages.org/publications/guidelines/guidelines-for-diagnosis-treatment-and-use-of-laparoscopy-for-surgical-problems-during-pregnancy (accessed September 25, 2024).Google Scholar
Mazze, RI, Källén, B. Reproductive Outcome after Anesthesia and Operation during Pregnancy: A Registry Study of 5405 Cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161(5):11781185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parikh, B, Hussain, FN, Brustman, L. Acute Abdomen in Pregnancy. Top Obstet Gynecol. 2019;39(7):17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ventolini, G, Hunter, L, Drollinger, D, et al. Ovarian Torsion during Pregnancy. HCP Live. December 2007. www.hcplive.com/view/2005-09_04 (accessed September 25, 2024).Google Scholar
Feng, JL, Zheng, J, Lei, T, et al. Comparison of Ovarian Torsion between Pregnant and Non-pregnant Women at Reproductive Ages: Sonographic and Pathological Findings. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020;10(1):137147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Committee Opinion No. 723: Guidelines for Diagnostic Imaging during Pregnancy and Lactation. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(4):e210–e216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, HB, Juarez-Colunga, E, Bronsert, M, et al. Effect of Pregnancy on Adverse Outcomes after General Surgery. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(7):637643.Google ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, EA, Borowski, KS, Brost, BC, et al. Antepartum Nonobstetrical Surgery at ≥ 23 Weeks’ Gestation and Risk for Preterm Delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(2):232.e1232.e5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Committee Opinion No. 775: Nonobstetric Surgery during Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(4):e285–e286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Grussu, P, Vicini, B, Quatraro, RM. Sexuality in the Perinatal Period: A Systematic Review of Reviews and Recommendations for Practice. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2021;30:100668.Google ScholarPubMed
Daud, S, Zahid, AZM, Mohamad, M, et al. Prevalence of Sexual Dysfunction in Pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300(5):12791285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassis, C, Mukhopadhyay, S, Morris, E, et al. What Happens to Female Sexual Function during Pregnancy? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;258:265268.Google ScholarPubMed
Galazka, I, Drosdzol-Cop, A, Narowska, B, et al. Changes in Sexual Function during Pregnancy. J Sex Med. 2015;12(2):445454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, CE. Sexual Health during Pregnancy and the Postpartum. J Sex Med. 2011;8(5):12671284.Google ScholarPubMed
Vennier, SA, Rosen, NO. Sexual Distress and Sexual Problems during Pregnancy: Associations with Sexual and Relationship Satisfaction. J Sex Med. 2017;14(3):387395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, SA, Brock, RL, DiLillo, D. Partner Support and Connection Protect Couples during Pregnancy: A Daily Diary Investigation. J Marriage Fam. 2022;84(2):494514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sobhgo, SS, Priddis, H, Smith, CA, et al. The Effect of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercise on Female Sexual Function during Pregnancy and Postpartum: A Systematic Review. Sex Med Rev. 2019;7(1):1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Canoy, JM, Mitchell, GS, Unold, D, et al. A Radiologic Review of Common Breast Disorders in Pregnancy and the Perinatal Period. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2012;33(1):7885.Google ScholarPubMed
Ahn, BY, Kim, HH, Moon, WK, et al. Pregnancy- and Lactation-Associated Breast Cancer: Mammographic and Sonographic Findings. J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22(5):491497; quiz 498–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Expert Panel on Breast, diFlorio-Alexander, RM, Slanetz, PJ, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Breast Imaging of Pregnant and Lactating Women. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(11S):S263S275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Practice Bulletin Number 179: Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Screening in Average-Risk Women. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(1):e1–e16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amant, F, Lefrère, H, Borges, VF, et al. The Definition of Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer Is Outdated and Should No Longer Be Used. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(6):753754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perez, F, Bragg, A, Whitman, G. Pregnancy Associated Breast Cancer. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2021;11:49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ong, A, Mullen, L, Harvey, S. Pregnancy Associated Breast Cancer and Other Breast Disease: A Radiologic Review. Appl Radiol. 2020;49:1017.Google Scholar
Ravikanth, R, Kamalasekar, K. Imaging of Lactating Adenoma: Differential Diagnosis of Solid Mass Lesion in a Lactating Woman. J Med Ultrasound. 2019;27(4):208210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Shnaekel, K, Wendel, M, Rabie, N, et al. Incarceration of the Gravid Uterus. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016;71(10):613619.Google ScholarPubMed
Pina Moreno, JM, Ruiz Minaya, M, Fraile López, A, et al. Importance of the Early Diagnosis of Incarcerated Gravid Uterus: Case Report and Systematic Review. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023;162:193201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, YS, Kwon, BS, Lee, YJ. Clinical Approach and Management of Uterine Incarceration According to Trimester of Pregnancy: Case Report and Literature Review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;60:911915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newell, SD, Crofts, JF, Grant, SR. The Incarcerated Gravid Uterus: Complications and Lessons Learned. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(2 Pt. 2):423427.Google ScholarPubMed
Samejima, K, Matsunaga, S, Takai, Y, et al. Efficacy of Well-Planned Management in Patients with Incarcerated Gravid Uterus: A Case Series and Literature Review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;60:679684.Google ScholarPubMed
Gardner, CS, Jaffe, TA, Hertzberg, BS, et al. The Incarcerated Uterus: A Review of MRI and Ultrasound Imaging Appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(1):223229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Katz, VL, Dotters, DJ, Droegemueller, W. Complications of Uterine Leiomyomas in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;73(4):593596.Google ScholarPubMed
Coronado, GD, Marshall, LM, Schwartz, SM. Complications in Pregnancy, Labor, and Delivery with Uterine Leiomyomas: A Population-Based Study. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(5):764769.Google ScholarPubMed
Hammoud, AO, Asaad, R, Berman, J, et al. Volume Change of Uterine Myomas during Pregnancy: Do Myomas Really Grow? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13(4):386390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maruo, T, Ohara, N, Wang, J, et al. Sex Steroidal Regulation of Uterine Leiomyoma Growth and Apoptosis. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10(3):207220.Google ScholarPubMed
Aharoni, A, Reiter, A, Golan, D, et al. Patterns of Growth of Uterine Leiomyomas during Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;95(5):510513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosati, P, Exacoustos, C, Mancuso, S. Longitudinal Evaluation of Uterine Myoma Growth during Pregnancy: A Sonographic Study. J Ultrasound Med. 1992;11(11):511515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, WH. Etiology, Symptomatology, and Diagnosis of Uterine Myomas. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(4):725736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, JP, Kay, HH, Mahony, BS. The Clinical Significance of Uterine Leiomyomas in Pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160(5 Pt. 1):12121216.Google ScholarPubMed
Norton, ME, Merril, J, Cooper, BA, et al. Neonatal Complications after Administration of Indomethacin for Preterm Labor. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(22):16021607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Ashbrook, M, Cheng, V, Sandhu, K, et al. Management of Complicated Appendicitis during Pregnancy in the US. JAMA Network Open. 2022;5(4):e227555.Google ScholarPubMed
Aggenbach, L, Zeeman, GG, Cantineau, AEP, et al. Impact of Appendicitis during Pregnancy: No Delay in Accurate Diagnosis and Treatment. Int J Surg. 2015;15:8489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guidry, SP, Poole, GV. The Anatomy of Appendicitis. Am Surg. 1994;60(1):68.Google ScholarPubMed
Choi, YS, Seo, JH, Yi, JW, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Acute Appendicitis in Pregnancy: 10-Year Experience at a Single Institution in South Korea. J Clin Med. 2023;12:3277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbassi-Ghanavati, M, Greer, LG, Cunningham, FG. Pregnancy and Laboratory Studies: A Reference Table for Clinicians. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(6):13261331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moghadam, MN, Salarzaei, M, Shahraki, Z. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Emerg Radiol. 2022;29(3):437448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Motavaselian, M, Bayati, F, Amani-Beni, R, et al. Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Acute Appendicitis in Pregnant Women; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2022;10(1):e81.Google ScholarPubMed
Committee Opinion No. 723: Guidelines for Diagnostic Imaging during Pregnancy and Lactation. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:e210–e216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basaran, A, Basaran, M. Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis during Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2009;64(7):481499.Google ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 775: Nonobstetric Surgery during Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e285–e286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talan, DA, Di Saverio, S. Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(12):11161123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talan, DA, Saltzman, DJ, DeUgarte, DA, et al. Methods of Conservative Antibiotic Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis: A Systematic Review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;86(4):722736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, CV, Abrishami, M, Muller, M, et al. Appendiceal Abscess: Immediate Operation or Percutaneous Drainage? Am Surg. 2003;69(10):829832.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×