Adams, J. (ed.) (2016 [2014]), The Bloomsbury Companion to Holocaust Literature. London and New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Agamben, G. (2002 [1999]), Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive. Trans. D. Heller-Roazen. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar

Aikin, S. F. and Talisse, R. B. (2018), Pragmatism, Pluralism, and the Nature of Philosophy. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Allison, H. E. (2004 [1983]), Kant’s Transcendental Idealism – An Interpretation and Defense: A Revised and Enlarged Edition. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Appelqvist, H. (ed.) (2020), Wittgenstein and the Limits of Language. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1958), The Human Condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1976 [1951]), The Origins of Totalitarianism. New ed. San Diego, CA: Harcourt.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (2003), The Portable Hannah Arendt. Baehr (ed.), P. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Atkins, R. (2016), Peirce and the Conduct of Life: Sentiment and Instinct in Ethics and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Axtell, G. (2013), “Possibility and Permission? Intellectual Character, Inquiry, and the Ethics of Belief.” In Rydenfelt, H. and Pihlström, S. (eds.), William James on Religion. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 165–198.Google Scholar

Axtell, G. (2019), Problems of Religious Luck: Assessing the Limits of Reasonable Religious Disagreement. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Bagger, M. (ed.) (2018), Pragmatism and Naturalism: Scientific and Social Inquiry after Representationalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Bergman, M. (2019), “Pragmatic Aims and Changing Habits.” In Rydenfelt et al. (eds.), 57–68.Google Scholar

Bernstein, R. J. (2002), Radical Evil: A Philosophical Interrogation. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bernstein, R. J. (2010), The Pragmatic Turn. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bernstein, R. J. (2017), “Epilogue: Engaged Pragmatic Pluralism.” In Craig, M. and Morgan, M. (eds.), Richard J. Bernstein and the Expansion of American Philosophy: Thinking the Plural. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 215–228.Google Scholar

Bernstein, R. J. (2018), Why Read Hannah Arendt Now. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bird, G. (1986), William James, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, R. B. (ed.) (1955), “An Empiricist’s View of the Nature of Religious Belief.” In Theory of Games as a Tool for the Moral Philosopher and An Empiricist’s View of the Nature of Religious Belief. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1994, 1–35.Google Scholar

Brune, J.-P., Stern, R., and Micha, W. H. (eds.) (2017), Transcendental Arguments in Moral Theory. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Burke, F. T. (2013), What Pragmatism Was. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Calcaterra, R. M. (1999), “W. James’ Defence of Free Will: A Step toward a Paradigm Shift.” In Egidi, R. (ed.), In Search of a New Humanism: The Philosophy of Georg Henrik von Wright. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 139–146.Google Scholar

Calcaterra, R. M. (2017), “William James’s Naturalism within the Common Project of Pragmatist Philosophy.” Rivista di storia della filosofia 3, 475–491.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. (2017), Experiencing William James: Belief in a Pluralistic World. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar

Capps, J. (2017), “A Pragmatic Argument for a Pragmatic Theory of Truth.” Contemporary Pragmatism 14, 135–156.Google Scholar

Capps, J. (2018), “Did Dewey Have a Theory of Truth?” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 54, 39–63.Google Scholar

Capps, J. (2019), “The Pragmatic Theory of Truth.” In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition). Available online: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/truth-pragmatic/.Google Scholar

Carlson, T. L. (1997), “James in the Kantian Tradition.” In Putnam, R. A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to William James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 363–384.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. (1950), “Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4, 20–40.Google Scholar

Carr, D. (1999), The Paradox of Subjectivity: The Self in the Transcendental Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cavarero, A. (2018), “‘Destroy Your Sight with a New Gorgon’: Mass Atrocity and the Phenomenology of Horror.” In Brudholm, T. and Lang, J. (eds.), Emotions and Mass Atrocity: Philosophical and Theoretical Explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 123–141.Google Scholar

Cavell, S. (1979), The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clifford, W. K. (1877), “The Ethics of Belief.” Available online: http://people.brandeis.edu/~teuber/Clifford_ethics.pdf.Google Scholar

Conant, J. (2000), “Freedom, Cruelty, and Truth: Rorty versus Orwell.” In Brandom, R. B. (ed.), Rorty and His Critics. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 268–342.Google Scholar

Cooke, E. (2006), Peirce’s Pragmatic Theory of Inquiry. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Corbin, A. (2018 [2016]), A History of Silence: From the Renaissance to the Present Day. Trans. J. Birrell. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Cormier, H. (2001), The Truth Is What Works: William James, Pragmatism, and the Seed of Death. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Craig, M. and Morgan, M. (eds.) (2017), Richard J. Bernstein and the Expansion of American Philosophy: Thinking the Plural. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Darby, D. (2009), Rights, Race, and Recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1986 [1929]), Experience and Nature. Chicago: Open Court. (1st ed. 1925; 2nd ed. 1929).Google Scholar

Dianda, A. (2018), “William James and the ‘Wilfulness’ of Belief.” European Journal of Philosophy 26, 647–662.Google Scholar

Draper, P. (2001), “Seeking but Not Believing: Confessions of a Practicing Agnostic.” In Howard-Snyder, D. and Moser, P. (eds.), Divine Hiddenness: New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 197–214.Google Scholar

Draper, P. (2017), “Atheism and Agnosticism.” In E. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available online: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atheism-agnosticism/#DefiAgno.Google Scholar

Forstenzer, J. (2018), “Something Has Cracked: Post-Truth Politics and Richard Rorty’s Postmodernist Bourgeois Liberalism.” Ash Center Occasional Papers. Cambridge, MA: Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation, Harvard Kennedy School.Google Scholar

Frankfurt, H. G. (2005), On Bullshit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Frankl, V. (1969), The Will to Meaning: Foundations and Applications of Logotherapy. New York: The American Library.Google Scholar

Gale, R. (1999), The Divided Self of William James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gavin, W. J. (1980), “Peirce and ‘The Will to Believe’.” The Monist 63, 342–350.Google Scholar

Glock, H.-J. (ed.) (2003), Strawson and Kant. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Goodman, N. (1954), Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Goodson, J. L. (ed.) (2018), William James, Moral Philosophy, and the Ethical Life. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Green, J. M. (2014), “Bernstein’s Deployment of Jamesian Democratic Pluralism: The Pragmatic Turn and the Future of Philosophy.” In Green, (ed.), Richard J. Bernstein and the Pragmatist Turn in Contemporary Philosophy: Rekindling Pragmatism’s Fire. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 78–94.Google Scholar

Griffiths, P. J. (2001), Problems of Religious Diversity. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Grube, D. M. (2019), “Comparing Pragmatism with Neo-Pragmatism on Realism and Naturalism.” In Rydenfelt et al. (eds.), 87–98.Google Scholar

Grube, D. M. and Van Herck, W. (eds.) (2017), Philosophical Perspectives on Religious Diversity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gunnarsson, L. (2020), Vernunft und Temperament: Eine Philosophie der Philosophie. Leiden: Brill / Mentis.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, M. (2019), “Blind Obedience.” In Rydenfelt et al. (eds.), 183–192.Google Scholar

Haack, S. (1995), “Vulgar Pragmatism: An Unedifying Prospect.” In Saatkamp, H. J. (ed.), Rorty and Pragmatism. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 126–147.Google Scholar

Haack, S. (1998), Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate: Unfashionable Essays. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Haack, S. (2019), “Post ‘Post-Truth’: Are We There Yet?” Theoria 85, 258–275.Google Scholar

Hardcastle, G. L. and Reisch, G. A. (eds.) (2006), Bullshit and Philosophy. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar

Hare, P. (2015), Pragmatism with Purpose: Selected Writings. Palencik, J., Anderson, D. R., and Miller, S. A. (eds.). New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar

Hasker, W. (2005), “Analytic Philosophy of Religion.” In Wainwright, W. J. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 421–446.Google Scholar

Hildebrand, D. (2003), Beyond Realism and Antirealism: Dewey and the Neopragmatists. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar

Hildebrand, D. (2019), “Pihlström’s Pragmatist Metaphysics: Transcendence and Meliorism.” In Rydenfelt et al. (eds.), 213–227.Google Scholar

Hintikka, J. (1996), Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator – An Ultimate Presupposition of Twentieth-Century Philosophy: Selected Papers 2. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Honenberger, P. (ed.) (2016), Naturalism and Philosophical Anthropology: Nature, Life, and the Human between Empirical and Transcendental Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Honnacker, A. (2018), Pragmatic Humanism Revisited: An Essay on Making the World a Home. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Honneth, A. (2005 [1992]), Kampf um Anerkennung. 2nd ed. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Hook, S. (1974), Pragmatism and the Tragic Sense of Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Hookway, C. (2000), Truth, Rationality, and Pragmatism: Themes from Peirce. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hookway, C. (2011), “James’s Epistemology and the Will to Believe.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 3:1. Available online: https://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/865.Google Scholar

Jackman, H. (1999), “Prudential Arguments, Naturalized Epistemology, and the Will to Believe.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 35, 1–37.Google Scholar

James, W. (1962 [1899]). “On a Certain Blindness in Human Beings.” In James, Talks to Teachers on Psychology and to Students on Some of Life’s Ideals. New York: Dover, 2015.Google Scholar

James, W. (1958 [1902]), The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar

James, W. (1975–1988), The Works of William James. 19 vols. Burkhardt, F. H., Bowers, F., and Skrupskelis (eds.), I. K.. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press. Contains, for example, The Principles of Psychology (1981 [1890]), The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy (1979 [1897]), The Varieties of Religious Experience (1985 [1902]), Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking (1975 [1907]), The Meaning of Truth: A Sequel to Pragmatism (1978 [1909]), A Pluralistic Universe (1979 [1909]), Some Problems of Philosophy (1977 [1911]), Essays in Radical Empiricism (1977 [1912]), Essays in Religion and Morality (1982), and Talks to Teachers on Psychology and to Students on Some of Life’s Ideals (1983 [1899]).Google Scholar

Joas, H. (2017), Die Macht des Heiligen: Eine Alternative zur Geschichte von der Entzauberung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Jonas, H. (1996), Mortality and Morality: A Search for the Good after Auschwitz. Vogel (ed.), L, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Jonkers, P. and Wiertz, O. J. (eds.) (2019), Religious Truth and Identity in an Age of Plurality. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jung, M. (2019), Science, Humanism, and Religion: The Quest for Orientation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kahlos, M., Koskinen, H. J. and Palmén, R. (eds.) (2019), Recognition and Religion. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kaila, E. (2014 [1939]), Human Knowledge. Trans. A. Korhonen. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar

Kannisto, H. (1984), “Filosofisen antropologian mahdollisuudesta” [On the Possibility of Philosophical Anthropology]. Ajatus 41 (Yearbook of the Philosophical Society of Finland), 217–235.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1990 [1781/1787]), Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Schmidt (ed.), R. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1983a [1788]), Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. In Weischedel, W. (ed.), Immanuel Kant: Werke in zehn Bänden, vol. 5. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1983b [1791]), “Über das Misslingen aller philosophischen Versuche in der Theodicee.” In Weischedel, W. (ed.), Immanuel Kant: Werke in zehn Bänden, vol. 9. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1983c [1793/1794]), Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der blossen Vernunft. In Weischedel, W. (ed.), Immanuel Kant: Werke in zehn Bänden, vol. 7. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Kearney, R. (2010), Anatheism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Kivistö, S. (2018), “Novelty: A History.” In Kivistö, , Lucubrationes Neolatinae: Readings of Neo-Latin Dissertations and Satires. Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 134. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar

Kivistö, S. and Pihlström, S. (2016), Kantian Antitheodicy: Philosophical and Literary Varieties. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Klein, A. (2015), “Science, Religion, and ‘The Will to Believe’.” HOPOS 5, 72–117.Google Scholar

Klein, A. (2018), Review of Aikin and Talisse (2018). Notre Dame Philosophy Reviews, May 9, 2018.Google Scholar

Klein, A. (2019), “Between Anarchism and Suicide: On William James’s Religious Therapy.” Philosophers’ Imprint 19, 32; www.philosophersimprint.org/019032/.Google Scholar

Knowles, J. (2019), “Pragmatism, Naturalism, and Metaphysics.” In Rydenfelt et al. (eds.), 69–86.Google Scholar

Koistinen, T. (2019), “Contemplative Philosophy and the Problem of Relativism.” In Rydenfelt et al. (eds.), 163–172.Google Scholar

Koopman, C. (2017), “The Will, the Will to Believe, and William James.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55, 491–512.Google Scholar

Korsgaard, C. (1996), The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Koskinen, H. J. (2017), “Mediated Recognition and the Categorial Stance.” Journal of Social Ontology 3, 67–87.Google Scholar

Koskinen, H. J. (2019), “Mediated and Transitive Recognition: Towards an Articulation.” In Kahlos, M., Koskinen, H. J., and Palmén, R. (eds.), Recognition and Religion. London and New York: Routledge, 34–50.Google Scholar

Koskinen, H. J. (2020), “Mediational Recognition and Metaphysical Power: A Systematic Analysis.” Journal of Social Ontology 5, 147–168.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1970 [1962]), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Launis, V. (2018), Ihmisarvo [Human Dignity]. Tampere: Vastapaino.Google Scholar

Levi, P. (1996 [1958]), Survival in Auschwitz: The Nazi Assault on Humanity. Trans. S. Woolf. New York: Touchstone Books.Google Scholar

Levi, P. (1988 [1986]), The Drowned and the Saved. Trans. R. Rosenthal. London: Michael Joseph.Google Scholar

Levinas, E. (2006 [1996]), Entre-Nous: Thinking-of-the-Other. Trans. M. B. Smith. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Lewis, C. I. (1923), “A Pragmatic Conception of the A Priori.” The Journal of Philosophy 20, 169–177.Google Scholar

Lynch, M. (2009), Truth as One and Many. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Madore, J. (2011), Difficult Freedom and Radical Evil in Kant. London and New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Malpas, J. (1997), “The Transcendental Circle.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75, 1–20.Google Scholar

Malpas, J. (ed.) (2003), From Kant to Davidson: Philosophy and the Idea of the Transcendental. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Manne, K. (2017), Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Marchetti, S. (2015), Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Marchetti, S. (2019), “Jamesian Liberalism and the Self.” In Rydenfelt et al. (eds.), 193–202.Google Scholar

Margalit, A. (2002), The Ethics of Memory. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Martin, M. (1990), Atheism: A Philosophical Justification. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

McDowell, J. (1996 [1994]), Mind and World. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McIntyre, L. (2018), Post-Truth. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Medina, J. (2010), “James on Truth and Solidarity: The Epistemology of Diversity and the Politics of Specificity.” In Stuhr, J. J. (ed.), 100 Years of Pragmatism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 124–143.Google Scholar

Misak, C. (2013), The American Pragmatists. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mounce, H. O. (1997), The Two Pragmatists: From Peirce to Rorty. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Murphey, M. G. (1968), “Kant’s Children: the Cambridge Pragmatists.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 4, 3–33.Google Scholar

Müller, O. F. (2018), “Pacifism as a Perspective: On the Inevitable Entanglement of Facts and Values.” Studies in Christian Ethics 31, 201–213.Google Scholar

Niiniluoto, I. (1999), Critical Scientific Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Niiniluoto, I. (2018), Truth-Seeking by Abduction. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Niiniluoto, I. (2019), “Queries about Pragmatic Realism.” In Rydenfelt et al. (eds.), 31–44.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. (2018), The Monarchy of Fear: A Philosopher Looks at Our Political Crisis. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

O’Connell, R. J. (1984), William James and the Courage to Believe. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar

Pappas, G. F. (1994), “William James’ Virtuous Believer.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 30, 77–109.Google Scholar

Patterson, D. (2018). The Holocaust and the Nonrepresentable: Literary and Photographic Transcendence. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Pawelski, J. (2007), The Dynamic Individualism of William James. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. (1992–1998), The Essential Peirce. 2 vols. Houser, N. et al. (eds.) (the Peirce Edition Project). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Contains, for example, “The Fixation of Belief” (1877) and “How to Make Our Ideas Clear” (1878), in vol. 1.Google Scholar

Perry, R. B. (1935), The Thought and Character of William James. 2 vols. London: Milford and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Perry, R. B. (1964 [1948]), The Thought and Character of William James: Briefer Version. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Phillips, D. Z. (1986), Belief, Change and Forms of Life. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Phillips, D. Z. (2004), The Problem of Evil and the Problem of God. London: SCM Publications.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (1996), Structuring the World: The Issue of Realism and the Nature of Ontological Problems in Classical and Contemporary Pragmatism. Acta Philosophica Fennica 59. Helsinki: The Philosophical Society of Finland.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (1998), Pragmatism and Philosophical Anthropology: Understanding Our Human Life in a Human World. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2003), Naturalizing the Transcendental: A Pragmatic View. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2004), “Recent Reinterpretations of the Transcendental.” Inquiry 47, 289–314.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2005), Pragmatic Moral Realism: A Transcendental Defense. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2007), “Transcendental Self-Deception.” Teorema 26, 177–189.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2008a), “The Trail of the Human Serpent Is over Everything”: Jamesian Perspectives on Mind, World, and Religion. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2008b), “How (Not) to Write the History of Pragmatist Philosophy of Science.” Perspectives on Science 16, 26–69.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2009), Pragmatist Metaphysics: An Essay on the Ethical Grounds of Ontology. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2010a), “Kant and Pragmatism.” Pragmatism Today 2:1. Available online: www.pragmatismtoday.eu/winter2010/Pihlstrom-Kant_and_Pragmatism.pdf.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2010b), “Toward a Pragmatically Naturalist Metaphysics of the Fact-Value Entanglement: Emergence or Continuity?” Journal of Philosophical Research 35, 323–352.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2011a), Transcendental Guilt: Reflections on Ethical Finitude. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2011b), “Morton White’s Philosophy of Culture: Holistic Pragmatism and Interdisciplinary Inquiry.” Human Affairs 21, 140–156.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2012a), “A New Look at Wittgenstein and Pragmatism.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 4:2. Available online: https://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/715.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2012b), “Eino Kaila on Pragmatism and Religion.” In Niiniluoto, I. and Pihlström, S. (eds.), Reappraisals of Eino Kaila’s Philosophy. Acta Philosophica Fennica 89. Helsinki: The Philosophical Society of Finland.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2013), Pragmatic Pluralism and the Problem of God. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2014a), Taking Evil Seriously. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2014b), “A Pragmatist Dimension in Georg Henrik von Wright’s Philosophy.” Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum 2:1, 5–17.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (ed.) (2015), The Bloomsbury Companion to Pragmatism. London and New York: Bloomsbury. (1st ed.: The Continuum Companion to Pragmatism. London: Continuum, 2011.)Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2016), Death and Finitude: Toward a Pragmatic Transcendental Anthropology of Human Limits and Finitude. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (ed.) (2017), Pragmatism and Objectivity: Essays Sparked by Nicholas Rescher’s Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2019a), “Applying William James’s Pragmatism to Life: Against ‘Applied Ethics’.” In Stagoll, C. and Levine, M. (eds.), Pragmatism Applied: William James and the Challenges of Contemporary Life. Albany: SUNY Press, 125–148.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2019b), “Pragmatism and the Phenomenology of Suffering.” Phänomenologische Forschungen 2/2019, 13–30.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2019c), “Truth, Suffering, and Religious Diversity: A Pragmatist Perspective.” In Jonkers and Wiertz (eds.), 41–60.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2019d), “Finnish Versions of Pragmatist Humanism: Eino Kaila and Georg Henrik von Wright as Quasi-Pragmatists.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 11:1. Available online: https://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/1543#text.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2020a), Pragmatic Realism, Religious Truth, and Antitheodicy: On Viewing the World by Acknowledging the Other. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2020b), “Pragmatism and Meaning Agnosticism.” Religions 11:302. Available online: www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/6/302.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. (2020c), “Theodicy by Other Means? Rethinking ‘God after Auschwitz’ through the Dialectics of Antitheodicism.” Cosmos and History 16. Available online: www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/868.Google Scholar

Pihlström, S. and Kivistö, S. (2021), Critical Distance: Ethical and Literary Engagements with Detachment, Isolation, and Otherness. Manuscript, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Plantinga, A. (2000), Warranted Christian Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Plato, The Republic. Trans. B. Jowett. Available online: http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/republic.html.Google Scholar

Price, H. (2011), Naturalism without Mirrors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Proudfoot, W. (1985), Religious Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Proudfoot, W. (2019), “Recognition, Theodicy, and Experience.” In Rydenfelt et al. (eds.), 133–142.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. (1981), Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. (1983), Realism and Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. (1990), Realism with a Human Face. Conant (ed.), J. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. (1992), Renewing Philosophy. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. (1994), Words and Life. Conant (ed.), J. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. (1999), The Threefold Cord. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. (2002), The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. (2004), Ethics without Ontology. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. (2016), Naturalism, Realism, and Normativity. Caro (ed.), M. de. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. and Putnam, R. A. (2017), Pragmatism as a Way of Life. Cambridge, MA and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. (1980 [1951]), “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” In Quine, From a Logical Point of View. Rev. ed. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press (1st ed. 1953).Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (1979), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (1989), Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (1991), Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (1998), Truth and Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (2000), “Response to James Conant.” In Brandom, R. B. (ed.), Rorty and His Critics. Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Blackwell, 342–350.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (2007), Philosophy as Cultural Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Russell, B. (1972 [1945]), A History of Western Philosophy. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Rydenfelt, H. (2019a), “Realism without Representationalism.” Synthese 198, 2901–2918.Google Scholar

Rydenfelt, H. (2019b), “Pragmatist Antinomy.” In Rydenfelt et al. (eds.), 45–56.Google Scholar

Rydenfelt, H., Koskinen, H. J., and Bergman, M. (eds.) (2019), Limits of Pragmatism and Challenges of Theodicy. Acta Philosophica Fennica 95. Helsinki: The Philosophical Society of Finland.Google Scholar

Rydenfelt, H. and Pihlström, S. (eds.) (2013), William James on Religion. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Saarinen, R. (2016), Recognition and Religion: A Historical and Systematic Study. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Saito, N. (2019), American Philosophy in Translation. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Sartre, J.-P. (1946), “Existentialism is a Humanism.” Available online: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/complexity/people/students/dtc/students2011/maitland/philosophy/sartre-eih.pdf.Google Scholar

Sharpe, M. (2019), “After the Fall: Camus on Evil.” In Nys, T. and de Wijze, S. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Evil. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 163–174.Google Scholar

Sinclair, R. (2011), “Morton White’s Moral Pragmatism.” Cognitio 12, 143–155.Google Scholar

Sinclair, R. (2014), “Dewey and White on Value, Obligation, and Practical Judgment.” Sats 15, 39–54.Google Scholar

Skowroński, K. and Pihlström, S. (eds.) (2019), Pragmatist Kant. Nordic Studies in Pragmatism 4. Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network. Available online: https://nordprag.org/nordic-studies-in-pragmatism/pragmatist-kant/.Google Scholar

Smith, J. and Sullivan, P. (eds.) (2011), Transcendental Philosophy and Naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Snellman, L. (2020), The Problem of Evil and the Problem of Intelligibility: A Grammatical Metacritique of the Problem of Evil. Diss. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Available online: https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/318648.Google Scholar

Snyder, T. (2010), Bloodlands: Europe between Hitler and Stalin. London: Vintage.Google Scholar

Snyder, T. (2015), Black Earth: The Holocaust as History and Warning. London: Vintage.Google Scholar

Snyder, T. (2018), The Road to Unfreedom. New York: Tim Duggan Books.Google Scholar

Sparti, D. (2005), “Let Us Be Human: Primo Levi and Ludwig Wittgenstein.” Philosophy and Literature 29, 444–459.Google Scholar

Standish, P. and Saito, N. (eds.) (2017), Stanley Cavell and Philosophy as Translation: The Truth Is Translated. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Stern, R. (ed.) (1999), Transcendental Arguments: Problems and Prospects. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Stern, R. (2000), Transcendental Arguments and Scepticism: Answering the Question of Justification. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. (1993 [1959]), Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. (1966), The Bounds of Sense. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. (1985), Scepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Stroud, B. (1968), “Transcendental Arguments.” The Journal of Philosophy 65, 241–256.Google Scholar

Stroud, B. (2000), Understanding Human Knowledge: Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stuhr, J. J. (2017), “Redeeming the Wild Universe: William James’s Will to Believe.” In Evans, D. H. (ed.), Understanding James, Understanding Modernism. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. (1989), Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. (1995 [1992]), “The Politics of Recognition.” In Taylor, , Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. (2002), Varieties of Religion Today: Re-experiencing William James. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Unamuno, M. de (1913), Tragic Sense of Life. Trans. J. E. Crawford Flitch (1921). New York: Dover (1954). Available online: www.gutenberg.org/files/14636/14636-h/14636-h.htm.Google Scholar

Vanden Auweele, D. (2019), Pessimism in Kant’s Ethics and Rational Religion. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Višňovský, E. (2020), “Rorty’s Humanism: Making It Explicit.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 12:1. Available online: https://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/1878.Google Scholar

White, M. (1973 [1949]), “The Analytic and the Synthetic: An Untenable Dualism.” In White, , The American Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

White, M. (1956), Toward Reunion in Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

White, M. (1981), What Is and What Ought to Be Done. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

White, M. (2002), A Philosophy of Culture: The Scope of Holistic Pragmatism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

White, M. (2005), From a Philosophical Point of View. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Williams, B. (2002), Truth and Truthfulness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Wisdom, J. (1944–1945), “Gods.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 45, 185–206.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1974 [1921]), Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Trans. B. F. McGuinness and D. Pears, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1953), Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1961), Notebooks 1914–1916. Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright (eds.), G. H., Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1966), Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology, and Religious Belief. Barrett (ed.), C.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1969), On Certainty. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe and D. Paul. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1980a), Culture and Value. Trans. Peter Winch. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1980b), Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge 1930–1933. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1993), Philosophical Occasions 1912–1951. Klagge, J. and Nordmann (eds.), A.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

von Wright, G. H. (1971), Explanation and Understanding, Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

von Wright, G. H. (1974), Causality and Determinism. New York and London: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

von Wright, G. H. (1980), Freedom and Determination. Acta Philosophica Fennica 31:1. Helsinki: The Philosophical Society of Finland.Google Scholar

von Wright, G. H. (1998), In the Shadow of Descartes: Essays in the Philosophy of Mind. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Yoder, S. D. (2013), “Making Space for Agnosticism: A Response to Dawkins and James.” American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 34, 135–153.Google Scholar

Zackariasson, U. (2019), “‘We Are All Survivors’ – Survivor Guilt and Pragmatic Meliorism.” In Rydenfelt et al. (eds.), 153–162.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, A. Z. (2018), Belief: A Pragmatic Picture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar