Adger, D. (2015a). More misrepresentation: A response to Behme and Evans 2015. Lingua 162: 160–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.05.005.Google Scholar

Adger, D. (2015b). Mythical myths: Comments on Vyvyan Evans’ The Language Myth.Lingua 158: 76–80.Google Scholar

Allott, N. and Textor., M. (2017). Lexical modulation without concepts. Dialectica 71(3): 399–424.Google Scholar

Alpi, A, Amrhein, N., Bertl, A. et al. (2007). Plant neurobiology: No brain, no gain? Trends in Plant Science 12(4): 135–6.Google Scholar

Ameka, F. (1992). Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics 18; 101–18.Google Scholar

Anderson, M. L. (2010). Neural re-use as a fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioural Science 33: 245–66.Google Scholar

Anscombre, J. and Ducrot., O. (1983). L’Argumentation dans la Langue. Brussels: Éditions Madarga.Google Scholar

Arnauld, A. and Lancelot., C. (1966). Grammaire générale et raisonnée, ou La grammaire de Port-Royal. Volume 2. Stuttgart: Frommann. (Originally published 1665.)Google Scholar

Arnold, M. (1960a). Emotion and Personality, Vol. I. Psychological Aspects. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Arnold, M. (1960b). Emotion and Personality, Vol. II. Neurological and Physiological Aspects. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Arp, R. (2008). Scenario Visualization: An Evolutionary Account of Creative Problem Solving. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Arundale, R. (1991). Studies in the way of words: Grice’s new directions in conceptualizing meaning in conversational interaction. Paper presented to the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL, 23–27 May 1991.Google Scholar

Augustine of Hippo. (1922). St. Augustine’s Treatise on the City of God, edited by Hitchcock, F.. London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge. (Originally published 426.)Google Scholar

Austin, J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Bach, K. (2006). Review of The Logic of Conventional Implicatures by Christopher Potts. Journal of Linguistics 42(2) (July): 490–5.Google Scholar

Bach, K. and Harnish., R. (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Badinter, R. (1981). Abolition de la peine de mort. Speech delivered at the Assemblé Nationale, Paris, September 17, 1981.Google Scholar

Baillargeon, R. (1987). Young infants’ reasoning about the physical and spatial characteristics of a hidden object. Cognitive Development 2: 179–200.Google Scholar

Bally, C. (1905). Précis de Stylistique. Geneva: C. Eggimann.Google Scholar

Bally, C. (1909). Traité de Stylistique Française. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Bally, C. (1910). L’étude systématique des moyens d’expression. Geneva: C. Eggimann.Google Scholar

Bally, C. (1926). La Langage et la Vie. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar

Baluska, F., and Mancuso., S. (2020). Plants, climates and humans: plant intelligence changes everything. EMBO Report 21(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202050109.Google Scholar

Banfield, A. (1973). Grammar of quotation, free indirect style, and implications for a theory of narrative. Foundations of Language 10(1): 1–39.Google Scholar

Barber, C. (1972). The Story of Language. London: Pan.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 577–660.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. (2003). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes 18: 513–62.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. (2005). Situated conceptualisation. In Cohen, H. and Lefebvre, C. (eds.), Handbook of Categorisation in Cognitive Science, 619–50. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Benveniste, E. (1966). De la subjectivité dans la langue. In Problèmes de linguistique générale, vol. 1, 259–60. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Bergquist, P. (1974). Phylum porifera. In Marshall, A. J., and Williams, W. D. (eds.), Textbook of Zoology Invertebrates, 7th ed., 76–103. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Berkum, J. J. van. (2018). Language comprehension, emotion, and sociality: Aren’t we missing something? Rueschemeyer, In S. and Gaskell, G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 644–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Berlin, B., and Kay, P.. (1969). Basic Color Terms. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Bickerton, D. (2009). Adam’s Tongue: How Humans Made Language, How Language Made Humans. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar

Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Blakemore, D. (2002). Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blakemore, D. (2011). On the descriptive ineffability of expressive meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 43(14): 3537–50.Google Scholar

Block, N. (1983). Mental pictures and cognitive science. The Philosophical Review 93(4): 499–541.Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, J. (2020). Linguistic relativity: From Whorf to now. In Gutzmann, D., Matthewson, L., Meier, C., Rullmann, H. and Zimmermann, T. (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics, 1st ed., 1–33. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Boroditsky, L. (2006). Linguistic relativity. Wiley Online Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/0470018860.s00567.Google Scholar

Briens, S. and Saussure, L. de. (2018). Littérature, émotion et expressivité: Pour un nouveau champ de recherche en littérature. Revue de littérature compare 365: 67–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rlc.365.0067.Google Scholar

Brody, B. (1969). Introduction. In Reid, T., Reid’s Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man, xxvi. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brown, G., and Levinson, S.. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Budanovic, N. (2017). ‘For sale: baby shoes, never worn’: Tracing the history of the shortest story ever told. Vintage News, 24 September. www.thevintagenews.com/2017/09/24/for-sale-baby-shoes-never-worn-tracing-the-history-of-the-shortest-story-ever-told/?chrome=1.Google Scholar

Bühler, K. (1933). Die Axiomatik der Sprachwissenschaften. Kant Studien 38(1–2): 19–90.Google Scholar

Buridant, C. (2006). L’interjection: jeux et enjeux. Langages 161: 3–9.Google Scholar

Byrne, R. and Whiten, A (eds.) (1988). Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes and Humans. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Caffi, C. and Janney, R. W. (1994). Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication. Journal of Pragmatics 22(3–4): 325–73.Google Scholar

Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. and Haggard., P. (2005). Action, observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex 15(8): 1243–9.Google Scholar

Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Carston, R. (2018). Figurative language, mental imagery and pragmatics. Metaphor and Symbol 33(3): 198–217.Google Scholar

Cave, T. and Wilson., D. (2018). Reading Beyond the Code: Literature and Relevance Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cesario, J., Johnson, D. J., and Eisthen, H. L. (2020). Your brain is not an onion with a tiny reptile inside. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3): 255–60.Google Scholar

Chao, L. L. and Martin, A.. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 12: 478–84.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language 35(1): 26–58.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2014). Science, mind, and limits of understanding. Talk at the Science and Faith Foundation (STOQ), The Vatican, January 2014. https://chomsky.info/201401–/.Google Scholar

Cicero, M. (1914). On Ends. Translated by H. Rackham. Loeb Classical Library 40, Book III. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cicero, M. T. (1883). De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum Libri Quinque. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, A. (2016). Surfing Uncertainty. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clough, P. and Halley., J. (2007). The Affective Turn: Theorising the Social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. (1999). Reason and Emotion: Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cornell, L. and Wharton., T. (2021). Before meaning: Creature construction, sea-sponges, lizards and human projection. In Ifantidou, E., de Saussure, L. and Wharton, T. (eds.), Beyond Meaning, 177–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition 31(3): 187–276.Google Scholar

Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J.. (1987). From evolution to behavior: Evolutionary psychology as the missing link. In Dupré, J. (ed.), The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality, 276–306. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cosmides, L. and Tooby., J. (2000). Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. In Lewis, M. and Haviland Jones, J. (eds.), Handbook of Emotions, 91–115. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Crawford, R., Davis, S., Harding, R. et al. (2000). Initial impact of the Treasure oil spill on seabirds off western South Africa. South African Journal of Marine Science 22(1): 157–76.Google Scholar

Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25(3): 349–67.Google Scholar

Curea, A. (2015). Entre Expression et Expressivité: L’Ecole Linguistique de Genève de 1900 à 1940: Charles Bally, Albert Sechehaye, Henri Frei. Lyons: ENS Éditions.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition 33(1–2): 25–62.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ Error. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1998). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. Edited with foreword, commentary and afterword by Ekman, P.. London: Harper Collins. (Originally published by John Murray in 1872.)Google Scholar

Davidson, D. (1978). What metaphors mean. Critical Inquiry (Special issue on Metaphor) 5(1): 31–47.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. (1981). Brainstorms: Philosophical Aims on Mind and Psychology. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Deonna, J., and Teroni., F. (2012). The Emotions: A Philosophical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

de Sousa, R. (1987). The Rationality of Emotion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dezecache, G., Mercier, H. and Scott-Phillips., T. (2013). An evolutionary approach to emotional communication. Journal of Pragmatics. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.007.Google Scholar

Dickinson, E. (1891). Wild nights! In Poems by Emily Dickinson, Second Series, 97. Edited by Higginson, T. and Loomis Todd, M.. Boston: Roberts Brothers.Google Scholar

Ducrot, O. (1972). Dire et ne pas dire. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar

Ducrot, O. (1973). Le preuve et le dire. Paris: Mame.Google Scholar

Dukes, D., Abrams, K., Adolphs, R. et al. (2021). The rise of affectivism. Nature Human Behaviour 5: 816–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01130-8.Google Scholar

Dusenbery, D. (1992). Sensory Ecology: How Organisms Acquire and Respond to Information. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1972). Universal and cultural differences in facial expression of emotions. In Cole, J. (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 207–83. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1989). The argument and evidence about universals in facial expressions of emotion. In Wagner, H. and Manstead, A. (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychophysiology. New York: Wiley, 143–64.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotion. Cognition and Emotion 6 (3/4): 169–200.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1994). Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: A reply to Russell’s mistaken critique. Psychological Bulletin 115(2): 268–87.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1999). Emotional and conversational nonverbal signals. In Messing, L. and Campbell, R. (eds.), Gesture, Speech and Sign, 45–57. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ekman, P., and Friesen., W. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17(2): 124–9.Google Scholar

Ekman, P., Sorenson, E. and Friesen., W. (1969). Pan-cultural elements in facial displays of emotion. Science 4(164) (3875): 86–8.Google Scholar

Elffers, E. (2020). Significs and Jacques van Ginneken. History and Philosophy of the Language Sciences (online only). https://hiphilangsci.net/2020/09/14/significs-and-jacques-van-ginneken/.Google Scholar

Ellsworth, P. C. (2013). Appraisal theory: Old and new questions. Emotion Review 5(2): 125–31.Google Scholar

Ellsworth, P. C. and Scherer, K. R.. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. In Davidson, R., Scherer, K. and Goldsmith, H. (eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences, 572–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Erdman, K. (1900). Die Bedeutung des Wortes. Leipzig: Haessel.Google Scholar

Escandell-Vidal, V. and Leonetti, M.. (2011). On the rigidity of procedural meaning. In Escandell-Vidal, V., Leonetti, M. and Ahern, A. (eds.), Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, 81–102. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar

Escobar, B., Velasco, C., Motoki, K., Byrne, D. and Wang., Q. (2021). The temperature of emotions. PLoS ONE 16(6): e0252408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252408.Google Scholar

Evans, V. (2014). The Language Myth: Why Language Is Not an Instinct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fabb, N. (2022). A Theory of Thrills, Sublime and Epiphany in Literature. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar

Faris, P. (1967). Eroticism in Emily Dickinson’s ‘Wild Nights!’. The New England Quarterly 40: 269.Google Scholar

Feagin, S. L. (2018). Reading with Feeling: The Aesthetics of Appreciation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501721465.Google Scholar

Fehr, L. and Russell, J. A. (1984). Concept of emotion viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113: 464–86.Google Scholar

Feldman Barrett, L. (2006). Are emotions natural kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science 1(1): 28–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00003.x.Google Scholar

Feldman Barrett, L. (2011). Was Darwin wrong about emotional expressions? Current Directions in Psychological Science 20: 400–6.Google Scholar

Feldman Barrett, L. (2017a). The theory of constructed emotion: An active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 12(1): 1–23.Google Scholar

Feldman Barrett, L. (2017b). How Emotions are Made. Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Fernández-Dols, J.-M., and Ruiz-Belda., M.-A (1995). Are smiles a sign of happiness? Gold medal winners at the Olympic Games. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6): 1113–19.Google Scholar

Fischer, A., and Sauter., D. (2017). What the theory of affective pragmatics does and doesn’t do. Psychological Inquiry. 28: 190–3.Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T. and Taylor, S. E.. (2008). Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Flaubert, G. (1885). L’Education sentimentale. Paris. Quantin.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (1975). The Language of Thought. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (1998). Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (2007). The revenge of the given. In McLaughlin, Brian P. and Cohen, Jonathan D. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind, 105–16. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (2008). LOT II: The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fontaine, J. and Scherer., K. (2013). Emotion is for doing: The action tendency component. In Fontaine, J., Scherer, K. and Soriano, C. (eds.), Components of Emotional Meaning: A Sourcebook, 170–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Foolen, A. (1997). The expressive function of language: Towards a cognitive semantic approach. In Niemeier, S. and Dirven, R. (eds.), The Language of Emotions, 15–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Fowler, A. (1989). A new theory of communication. London Review of Books, 30 March. www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v11/n07/alastair-fowler/a-new-theory-of-communication.Google Scholar

Frege, G. (1948). Sense and reference. The Philosophical Review 57(3): 209–30.Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1957). The unconscious. In Strachey, J. (ed.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XIV, 159–216. London: Vintage. (Originally published 1915.)Google Scholar

Fridland, E. (2015). Knowing how: Problems and considerations. European Journal of Philosophy 23(3): 703–27.Google Scholar

Fridlund, A. (1992). Darwin’s anti-Darwinism in the ‘Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals.’ In Strongman, K. T. (ed.). International Review of Studies on Emotion Vol. 2: 117–37. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Fridlund, A. (1994). Human Facial Expression: An Evolutionary View. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Fridlund, A. (2017). On scorched earths and bad births: Scarantino’s misbegotten ‘theory of affective pragmatics’. Psychological Inquiry 28(2–3): 197–205.Google Scholar

Frijda, N. (2007). The Laws of Emotion. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Furberg, M. (1970). An analysis of non-natural meaning. In Dahlquist, T. and Pauli, T. (eds.), Logic and Value, 9–21. Uppsala: Filosofiska Föreningen Och Filosofiska Institutionen Vid Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar

Furberg, M. (1971). Saying and Meaning: A Main Theme in J. L. Austin’s Philosophy. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Furberg, M. (2010). Ursus Philosophicus. In Philosophical Communications, Web Series, No. 32. (Online resource.) Gothenburg: Department of Philosophy, Gothenburg University, Sweden.Google Scholar

Gardiner, A. (1932). The Theory of Speech and Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Garrido, M. I., Barnes, G. R., Sahani, M. and Dolan, R. J.. (2012). Functional evidence for a dual route to amygdala. Current Biology 22(2): 129–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.056.Google Scholar

Garzon, P. and Keijzer., F. (2011). Plants: Adaptive behavior, root–brains, and minimal cognition. Adaptive Behavior 19(3): 155–71.Google Scholar

Gazdar, G. (1979). Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. New York: Academic.Google Scholar

Genette, G. (1983). Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. and Todd., P. (1999). Fast and frugal heuristics: The adaptive toolbox. In Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. and the ABC Research Group (eds.), Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, 3–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. and The ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ginneken, J. van. (1907). Principes de Linguistique Psychologique. Paris: Rivière.Google Scholar

Ginneken, J. van. (1943). Het Mysterie der Menschelijke Taal. Haarlem: Bohn.Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20(1): 1–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X97000010.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1964). The neglected situation. American Anthropologist 66(6): Part 2; 133–6.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Golding, A. (2016). Metaphor in the embodied mind: Beyond the propositionality of figurative language. (PhD thesis, University of Brighton.)Google Scholar

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Graver, M. (2002). Cicero on the Emotions: Tuscan Disputations III and IV. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Gray, J. (1995). A model of the limbic system and basal ganglia. In Gazzaniga, M. S. (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences, 1165–76. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Greenspan, P. (2002). Practical reasoning and emotion. In Mele, A. and Rawlings, P. (eds.), Rationality, 206–21. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195145399.003.0011.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review 66: 377–88.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1969). Utterer’s meaning and intentions. Philosophical Review 78: 147–77.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1975). Method in philosophical psychology (from the banal to the bizarre). Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 48: 23–53.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1982). Meaning revisited. In Smith, N. (ed.), Mutual Knowledge. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gregg, M. and Seigworth, G. (eds.) (2010). The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Gutt, E.-A. (2013). How does the affective relate to ostensive-inferential communication? (Unpublished MS.)Google Scholar

Hall, A. (2007). Do discourse connectives encode concepts or procedures? Lingua 117(1): 149–74.Google Scholar

Hardwick, C. S. (ed.). (1977). Semiotic and Significs: The Correspondence Between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Hare, R. (1949). Imperative sentences. Mind 98 (529): 21–38.Google Scholar

Hare, R. (1971). Practical Inferences. London: Red Globe Press.Google Scholar

Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. and Rapson, R.. (1994) Emotional Contagion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hauser, M. (1996). The Evolution of Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., and Fitch., T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it? Who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298: 1569–79.Google Scholar

Heine, B. (2023). The Grammar of Interactives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Herman, E. S. and Chomsky, N.. (1988). Manufacturing Consent. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Hess, W. R. and Akert, K.. (1965). Experimental data on role of hypothalamus in mechanism of emotional behavior. A.M.A. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 73: 127–9.Google Scholar

Hitchcock, F. R. M. (ed.). (1922). St. Augustine’s Treatise on the City of God. London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.Google Scholar

Hockett, C. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American 203: 88–111.Google Scholar

Hoggett, P. and Thompson, S.. (2012). Introduction. In Thompson, S. and Hoggett, P. (eds.), Politics and the Emotions: The Affective Turn in Contemporary Political Studies, 1–20. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Holtgraves, T. (2005). The production and perception of implicit performatives. Journal of Pragmatics 37(12): 2024–43.Google Scholar

Humboldt, W. von. (1999). ‘On Language’: On the Diversity of Human Language Construction and Its Influence on the Mental Development of the Human Species. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1836.)Google Scholar

Hume, D. (1739). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Humphrey, N. (1984). Consciousness Regained. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Huron, D. (2006). Sweet Anticipation: Music and the Psychology of Expectation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Izard, C. (1971). The Face of Emotion. New York: Appleton–Century Crofts.Google Scholar

Jackson, J., Watts, J., Henry, T. et al. (2019). Emotion semantics show both cultural variation and universal structure. Science 20(366) (6472): 1517–22.Google Scholar

Jagoe, C. and Wharton., T. (2012). Meaning non-verbally: The neglected corners of the bi-dimensional continuum communication in people with aphasia. Journal of Pragmatics 178: 21–30.Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1929). Romantické všeslovanství – nová slavistika. [Romantic pan-Slavism – A new Slavistics.] Čin 1(1): 10–12.Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1971). Shifters, verbal categories and the Russian verb. In Selected Writings of Roman Jakobson, vol. 2, 386–92. Berlin: Mouton. (Original manuscript 1957.)Google Scholar

James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind 9: 188–205.Google Scholar

James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology, vol. 1. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar

January, D. and Kako., E. (2007). Re-evaluating evidence for linguistic relativity: Reply to Boroditsky (2001). Cognition 104(2): 417–26.Google Scholar

Jenninger, Philip. (1988). Rede am 10. November 1988 im Deutschen Bundestag. Landesmedienzentruzm Baden-Wurtemberg. Online. www.lmz-bw.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/Handouts/2018-06-13-jenninger-rede.pdf. (Translation ours.)Google Scholar

Jowett, B. (trans.). (n.d.) Cratylus, by Plato. The Internet Classics Archive. www.classics.mit.edu/Plato/cratylus.html. (mit.edu).Google Scholar

Kay, P., Berlin, B., Maffi, L., Merrifield, W. R. and Cook, R.. (2011). World Colour Survey. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Keen, S. (2015). Intersectional narratology in the study of narrative empathy. Narrative Theory Unbound: Queer and Feminist Interventions, 123–46. Ohio: Ohio State Press.Google Scholar

Keltner, D., Oatley, K. and Jenkins, J.. (2019). Understanding Emotions. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kerouac, J. (1977). Alone on a mountain top. In Lonesome Traveler, 116–30. St. Albans: Granada Press. (Originally published 1960.)Google Scholar

Kleiber, G. (2016). Du cri de douleur au signe de douleur: l’ interjection ‘Aïe’. Synergies Pays Scandinaves 11/12: 113–33.Google Scholar

Klemperer, V. (1998). I Will Bear Witness: A Diary of the Nazi Years – 1933–1941. London: Random House. (Originally published 1947.)Google Scholar

Kneepkens, C. H. (2015). The collection of grammatical sophismata in MS London, BL, Burney 330. An exploratory study. Vivarium 53: 294–321.Google Scholar

Knuuttila, S. (2004). Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Koerner, K. (1989). Leonard Bloomfield and the cours de linguistique générale. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 43: 55–63.Google Scholar

Kolaiti, P. (2015). The poetic mind: A producer-oriented approach to literature and art. Journal of Literary Semantics 44(1): 23–44.Google Scholar

Kolaiti, P. (2019). The Limits of Expression: Language, Literature, Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kolaiti, P. (2022).Perceptual relevance and art: Some tentative suggestions. Journal of Literary Semantics: 49: 2.Google Scholar

Kolaiti, P. (in press). From a Poetics of Language to a Poetics of Action: Literature and Art as a Cognitive Object. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kolaiti, P., and Wharton., T. (in press). Language, Literature and Art: The Composite Organism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Komatsu, E. and Harris., R. (1993). Saussure’s Third Course in General Linguistics (from the Notebooks of Emile Constantin). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

König, E. (1991). Identical values in conflicting roles: The use of German ausgerechnet, eben, genau and gerade as focus particles. In Werner, A. (ed.), Discourse Particles, 11–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Koopman, E. and Hakemulder, F.. (2015). Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: A theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory 9(1): 79–111.Google Scholar

Kraut, R., and Johnston., R. (1979). Social and emotional messages of smiling: An ethological approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 1529–53.Google Scholar

Land, S. (1986). The Philosophy of Language in Britain: Major Theories from Hobbes to Thomas Reid (AMS Studies in the Seventeenth Century). New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar

Lange, C. and James, W. (eds.). (1922). The Emotions. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins Company. (Original Om Sindsbevægelser, en Psyko-fysiologisk Studie, 1885.)Google Scholar

Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological Stress and the Coping Process. New York:McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Lazarus, R. (1991). Emotion and Adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

LeDoux, J. (1989). Cognitive emotional interactions in the brain. In Izard, C. (ed.), Development of Emotion Cognitive Relations, 267–89. Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

LeDoux, J. E. (1992). Emotion and the amygdala. In Aggleton, J. P. (ed.), The Amygdala: Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion, Memory, and Mental Dysfunction, 339–51. New York: Wiley–Liss.Google Scholar

LeDoux, J. (1996). The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Lee, K. and Tanfani, J.. (2016). Donald Trump’s claim that Hillary Clinton wants ‘open borders’ doesn’t hold up. Los Angeles Times, 19 October. www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-open-border-fact-check-20161019-snap-story.html.Google Scholar

Lepore, E. and Stone., M. (2010). Against metaphorical meaning. Topoi 29: 165–80.Google Scholar

Leslie, A. (1994). ToMM, ToBY and agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In Hirschfeld, L. L. and German, S. (eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain-Specificity in Communication and Culture, 119–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lettvin, J, Maturana, H., McCulloch, W. and Pitts., W. (1959). What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain. Proceedings of the IRE (September): 1940–51.Google Scholar

Levelt, W. J. M. (1993). Lexical access in speech production. In Reuland, E. and Abraham, W. (eds.), Knowledge and Language, 241–51. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1840-8_11.Google Scholar

Levinson, R. (2003). Blood, sweat, and fears: The autonomic architecture of emotion. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1000: 348–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1280.016.PMID:14766648.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. (2000). Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Leys, S. (2015). Elements of a ‘nervous system’ in sponges. Journal of Experimental Biology 218: 581–91.Google Scholar

Lieberman, M. (2000). Intuition: A social-cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychological Bulletin 126: 109–37.Google Scholar

Lighthill, M. (1970). Aquatic animal propulsion of high hydromechanical efficiency. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 44(2): 265–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112070001830.Google Scholar

Liu, S. (2011). An experimental study of the classification and recognition of Chinese speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics 43(6): 1801–17.Google Scholar

Locke, J. and Bennett, J.. (1689/2004). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. N.p.: Jonathan Bennett.Google Scholar

Long, W. (2014). Understanding ‘relevance’ in psychology, New Ideas in Psychology 35: 28–35.Google Scholar

Lycan, W. (1991). Review of Avramides, A. (1989) Meaning and Mind: An Examination of a Gricean Account of Language. Mind and Language 6: 83–6.Google Scholar

Maillat, D., and Oswald, S.. (2011). Constraining context: A pragmatic account of cognitive manipulation. In Hart, C. (ed.), Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Maillat, D. and Oswald, S. (eds.). (2013). Biases and constraints in communication: argumentation, persuasion and manipulation. Special issue of Journal of Pragmatics. Volume 59, Part B. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Malle, B. (2004). How the Mind Explains Behavior: Folk Explanations, Meaning, and Social Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Maratos, F. and Pessoa., L. (2019). What drives prioritized visual processing? A motivational relevance account. Progress in Brain Research 247: 111–48.Google Scholar

Margolis, E. (1998). How to acquire a concept. Mind and Language 13: 347–69.Google Scholar

Martinovic, J., Paramei, G. V. and MacInnes, W. J.. (2020). Russian blues reveal the limits of language influencing colour discrimination. Cognition. 201 (August): 104281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104281.Epub2020Apr7.PMID:32276236.Google Scholar

Marty, A. (1875). Ueber den Ursprung der Sprache (On the Origin of Language). Würzburg: Stuber.Google Scholar

McBeath, M., Shaffer, D. and Kaiser, M.. (1995). How baseball outfielders determine where to run to catch fly balls. Science 268 (5210): 569–73.Google Scholar

McElvenny, J. (2014). Ogden and Richards’ The Meaning of Meaning and early analytic philosophy. Language Sciences Vol. 41, Part B: 212–21.Google Scholar

McGinn, C. (2004). Mindsight. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McGuinness, B. (1966). The mysticism of the Tractatus. The Philosophical Review 75(3): 305–28.Google Scholar

Meillet, A. (1910). Compte-rendu: Ch. Bally – Traité de stylistique française. Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris 16: cxviii–cxxii. http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k321579/f125.image.Google Scholar

Melcher, J. and Schooler., J. (2004). Perceptual and conceptual training mediate the verbal overshadowing effect in an unfamiliar domain. Memory and Cognition 32: 618–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195853.Google Scholar

Montagrin, V., Sterpenich, T., Brosch, D. et al. (2018). Goal-relevant situations facilitate memory of neutral faces. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 18: 1269–82.Google Scholar

Moors, A. (2009). Theories of emotion causation: A review. Cognition and Emotion 23(4): 625–62.Google Scholar

Moors, A. (2014). Flavors of appraisal theories of emotion. Emotion Review 6(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914534477.Google Scholar

Moors, A., Ellsworth, P., Scherer, K. R. and Frijda, N. H.. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 5, 119–24.Google Scholar

Murphy, C. (1999). Aquinas on our responsibility for our emotions. Medieval Philosophy and Theology 8: 163–205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Naar, H. and Teroni., F. (2018). The Ontology of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nanni, N. di, Gnocchi, M., Moscatelli, M., Milanesi, L. and Mosca., E. (2020). Gene relevance based on multiple evidences in complex networks. Bioinformatics 36(3): 865–71.Google Scholar

Neale, S. (1992). Paul Grice and the philosophy of language. Linguistics and Philosophy 15(5): 509–59.Google Scholar

Nerlich, B., and Clark., D. (1996). Language, Action, and Context: The Early History of Pragmatics in Europe and America. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Oatley, K. and Djikic., M. (2018). Psychology of narrative art. Review of General Psychology, 22(2): 161–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000113.Google Scholar

Oatley, K. and Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1(1): 29–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938708408362.Google Scholar

Oatley, K., Keltner, D. and Jenkins., J. (2006). Understanding Emotions. Oxford: Blackwell. (Originally published 1996.)Google Scholar

Ogden, C. and Richards., I. (1923). The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

Olteanu, L., Golani, S, Eitam, B. and Kron, A.. (2019). The effect of relevance appraisal on the emotional response. Emotion 19(4): 715–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000473.Google Scholar

Orwell, G. (1946). Politics and the English language. Horizon, April. www.orwell.ru/library/essays/politics/english/e_polit.Google Scholar

Padilla Cruz, M. (2009a). Might interjections encode concepts? More questions than answers. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5(2): 241–70.Google Scholar

Padilla Cruz, M. (2009b). Towards an alternative relevance-theoretic approach to interjections. International Review of Pragmatics 1(1): 182–206.Google Scholar

Papert, S. (1970). Teaching Children Thinking (AI Memo No. 247 and Logo Memo No. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.Google Scholar

Petrilli, S. (2009). Signifying and Understanding Reading the Works of Victoria Welby and the Signific Movement. Semiotics, Communication and Cognition, Vol. 2. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Petty, R. and Cacioppo., J. (1996). Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. New York: Avalon Publishing.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1957). Construction of Reality in the Child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Pignocchi, A. (2012). The intuitive concept of art. Philosophical Psychology 27(3): 425–44.Google Scholar

Pilkington, A. (2000). Poetic Effects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Piskorska, A. (2012). Cognition and emotions – a joint effort at obtaining positive cognitive effects? In Piskorska, A. (ed.), Relevance Studies in Poland, Vol. 4. Essays on Language and Communication, 102–11. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.Google Scholar

Plantin, C. (2004). On the inseparability of emotion and reason in argumentation. In Weigand, E. (ed.), Emotion in Dialogic Interaction (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 248), 265–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Pool, E., Brosch, T., Delplanque, S. and Sander., D. (2016a). Attentional bias for positive emotional stimuli: A meta-analytic investigation. Psychological Bulletin 142(1): 79–106.Google Scholar

Pool, E., Sennwald, V, Delplanque, S, Brosch, T. and Sander, D. (2016b). Measuring wanting and liking from animals to humans: A systematic review. Neuroscience and Biobehavoral Reviews 63(2016): 124–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.01.006.Google Scholar

Popper, K. (1973). Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Potts, C. (2005). The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Potts, C. (2007). The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2): 165–97.Google Scholar

Pozner, I. (2022). The relevance-affective model: Explaining narrative empathy within relevance theory. (Thesis, University of Neuchatel.)Google Scholar

Premack, D. (1990). The infant’s theory of self-propelled objects. Cognition 36(1): 1–16.Google Scholar

Premack, D. and Premack., A. (1994). Moral belief: Form versus content. In Hirschfeld, L. and German, S. (eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain-Specificity in Communication and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pylyshyn, Z. (1973). What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin 80(1): 1–24.Google Scholar

Qiu, M. (In press). Communicating conceptual and perceptual dimensions: Mental imagery and a dual-route processing of metaphor. (PhD thesis, University of Brighton.)Google Scholar

Radcliffe, E. (1999). Hume on the generation of motives: Why beliefs alone never motivate. Hume Studies 25(1–2): 101–22.Google Scholar

Ramachandran, V., and Hirstein., W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(6–7): 15–51.Google Scholar

Rayo, A. (2013). A plea for semantic localism. Noûs 47(4): 647–79.Google Scholar

Recanati, F. (1998). Pragmatics. In Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 620–33. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Recanati, F. (2004). Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Reekum, C. van and Scherer., K. (1997). Levels of processing in emotion-antecedent appraisal. Advances in Psychology 124: 259–300.Google Scholar

Reid, T. (1774). A brief account of Aristotle’s logic, Vol III, Book III, p. 309. In Home, H., Kames, Lord (ed.), Sketches of the History of Man. Edinburgh:W. Creech.Google Scholar

Reid, T. (1969). Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man, edited by Brody, B.. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press. (Originally published 1785.)Google Scholar

Rey, G. (1980). Functionalism and the emotions. In Rorty, A. (ed.), Explaining Emotions, 163–98. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Rey, G. (1981). Introduction: What are mental images? In Block, N. (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology: 117–27. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Richardson, S. (2007). Creatures of the Intertidal Zone. Birmingham, UK: Cinnamon Press.Google Scholar

Rochat, P. (2018). The ontogeny of human self-consciousness. Current Directions in Psychological Science 27(5): 345–50.Google Scholar

Roseman, I. (2013). Appraisal in the emotion system: Coherence in strategies for coping. Emotion Review 5(2): 141–9.Google Scholar

Rousseau, J.-J. (1986). On the Origins of Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Rousseau, J.-J. (2009). Essai sur l’Origine des Langues. Paris: L’Harmattan. (Originally published 1761.)Google Scholar

Russell, B. (1903). The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Russell, J. A. (1991). Culture and the categorization of emotions. Psychological Bulletin. Nov. 110(3): 426–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.426. PMID: 1758918.Google Scholar

Russell, J. (1994). Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expression? A review of cross-cultural studies. Psychological Bulletin 115: 102–41.Google Scholar

Russell, J. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review 110(1): 145–72.Google Scholar

Russell, J., and Feldman Barrett., L. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76(5): 805–19.Google Scholar

Salazar-López, E., Domínguez, E., Ramos, V. Juárez et al. (2015). The mental and subjective skin: Emotion, empathy, feelings and thermography. Consciousness and Cognition, 34: 149–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 May 4. PMID: 25955182.Google Scholar

Samuel, S., Cole, G. and Eacott., M. (2019). Grammatical gender and linguistic relativity: A systematic review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 26(6): 1767–86.Google Scholar

Sander, D., Grafman, J. and Zalla, T.. (2003). The human amygdala: An evolved system for relevance detection. Reviews in the Neurosciences 14: 303–16.Google Scholar

Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. London: Harvest.Google Scholar

Saracevic, T. (1975). Relevance: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 26(6): 321–43.Google Scholar

Saussure, F. de. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Lausanne and Paris:Payot.Google Scholar

Saussure, L. de. (2005). Manipulation and cognitive pragmatics: preliminary hypotheses. In de Saussure, L. and Schulz, P. (eds.), Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century. Discourse, Language, Mind, 113–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Saussure, L. de. (2021). An experiential view on what makes literature relevant. In Ifantidou, E., de Saussure, L. and Wharton, T. (eds.), Beyond Meaning, 99–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Saussure, L. de and Schulz., P. (2009). Subjectivity out of irony. Semiotica 173(1–4): 397–416.Google Scholar

Saussure, L. de and Wharton., T. (2020). Relevance, effect and affect. International Review of Pragmatics 12(2): 183–205.Google Scholar

Scarantino, A. (2017a). How to do things with emotional expressions: The theory of affective pragmatics. Psychological Inquiry 28(2–3): 165–85.Google Scholar

Scarantino, A. (2017b). Twelve questions for the theory of affective pragmatics. Psychological Inquiry 28(2–3): 217–23.Google Scholar

Scarantino, A., and de Sousa., R. (2021). Emotion. In E. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/emotion.Google Scholar

Scherer, K. (1982). Emotion as a process: Function, origin and regulation. Social Science Information 21: 555–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/053901882021004004.Google Scholar

Scherer, K. (1994a). An emotion’s occurrence depends on the relevance of an event to the organism’s goal/need hierarchy. In Ekman, P and Davidson, R. (eds.), The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions, 227–31. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Scherer, K. (1994b). Toward a concept of ‘modal emotions’. In Ekman, P. and Davidson, R. (eds.), The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions, 25–31. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Scherer, K. (2003). Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms. Speech Communication 40(1–2): 227–56.Google Scholar

Scherer, K. (2009). The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model. Cognition and Emotion 23: 1307–51.Google Scholar

Scherer, K. (2013). The nature and dynamics of relevance and valence appraisals: Theoretical advances and recent evidence. Emotion Review 5: 150–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912468166.Google Scholar

Scherer, K. and Moors, A.. (2019). The emotion process: Event appraisal and component differentiation. Annual Review of Psychology 70: 719–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011854.Google Scholar

Scherer, K., Schorr, A. and Johnstone., T. (2001). Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schmitter, A. M. (2014). 17th and 18th century theories of emotions. In Zalta, E. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/emotions-17th18th/.Google Scholar

Schooler, J., and Melcher., J. (1994). The ineffability of insight. In Smith, S. T. W. and Finke, R. (eds.), The Creative Cognition Approach, 97–133. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Schuhmann, K. and Smith., B. (1990). Elements of speech act theory in the work of Thomas Reid. History of Philosophy Quarterly 7: 47–66.Google Scholar

Scott-Phillips, T. C. (2015). Speaking Our Minds. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1965). What is a speech act? In Black, M. (ed.) Philosophy in America, 221–39. Melbourne: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1975). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In Gunderson, K. (ed.) Language, Mind and Knowledge. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 7. (Reprinted in Searle 1979: 1–29.)Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1979). Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J. (2006). Exploring the Psychology of Interest. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195158557.001.0001.Google Scholar

Simmons, W. K., Martin, A and Barsalou, L. W.. (2005). Pictures of appetizing foods activate gustatory cortices for taste and reward. Cerebral Cortex 15: 1602–08.Google Scholar

Soteriou, M. (2018). The ontology of emotion. In Naar, H. and Teroni, F. (eds.), The Ontology of Emotions, 71–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Spelke, E. (1990). Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 14(1): 29056.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2011). Conceptualising ‘the relational’ in pragmatics: Insights from metapragmatic emotion and (im)politeness comments. Journal of Pragmatics 43(14): 3565–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.009.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. (1975). Why are perfect animals, hybrids, and monsters food for symbolic thought? Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 8(2): 143–69.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. (2000). Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In Sperber, D. (ed.), Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, 117–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. (2001). An evolutionary perspective on testimony and argumentation. Philosophical Topics 29: 401–13.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. (2005). Modularity and relevance: How can a massively modular mind be flexible and context-sensitive? In Carruthers, P., Laurence, S. and Stich, S. (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Content, 53–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. (2019). Instincts or gadgets? Not the debate we should be having (Commentary on Heyes C. (2019) Précis of Cognitive Gadgets: The Cultural Evolution of Thinking). Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42: 35–7.Google Scholar

Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C. et al. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind and Language 25: 359–93.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. and Wilson., D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Originally published 1986.)Google Scholar

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1998). The mapping between the mental and public lexicon. In Carruther, P. and Bouchers, J. (eds.) Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes, 184–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D.. (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading. Mind and Language 17(1&2): 3–23.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. and Wilson., D. (2015). Beyond speaker’s meaning. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15(44): 117–49.Google Scholar

Sperber, H. (1914). Über den Affekt als Ursache der Sprachveränderung. Halle a.d. Saale: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 74(11): 1.Google Scholar

Stachenfeld, K., Botvinick, M. and Gershman, S. (2017). The hippocampus as a predictive map. Nature Neuroscience 20: 1643–53.Google Scholar

Stanley, J. (2011). Know How. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sterling, P. (2004). Principles of allostasis. In Schulkin, J. (ed.). Allostasis, Homeostasis, and the Costs of Physiological Adaptation, 17–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sterling, P. (2012). Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation. Physiology and Behavior, 106(1): 5–15.Google Scholar

Sterling, P. (2020). What Is Health? Allostasis and the Evolution of Human Design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Stussi, Y., Delplanque, S., Coraj, S., Pourtois, G. and Sander., D. (2018). Measuring Pavlovian appetitive conditioning in humans with the postauricular reflex.Psychophysiology 55(8): Article e13073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13073.Google Scholar

Suppes, P. (1996). The primacy of utterer’s meaning. In Grandy, R. and Warner, R. (eds.), Philosophical Grounds of Rationality: Intentions, Categories, Ends, 109–29. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Swanson, L. (2000). Cerebral hemisphere regulation of motivated behaviour. Brain Research 886: 113–64.Google Scholar

Swee, G. and Schirmer., A. (2015). On the importance of being vocal: Saying ‘ow!’ improves pain tolerance. Journal of Pain 16(4): 326–34.Google Scholar

Tarski, A. (1941). Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of the Deductive Sciences. New York: Dover Press.Google Scholar

Tervaniemi, M., Janhunen, L., Kruck, S., Putkinen, V. and Huotilainen., M. (2015). Auditory profiles of classical, jazz, and rock musicians: Genre-specific-sensitivity to musical sound features. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1900.Google Scholar

Thompson, S. and Hoggett, P. (eds.). (2012). Politics and the Emotions: The Affective Turn in Contemporary Political Studies. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Tomkins, S. (1962). Affect, Imagery, Consciousness, Vol. 1. The Positive Effects. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L.. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (eds.), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, 19–136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Trotter, D. (1992). Analysing literary prose: The relevance of relevance theory. Lingua 87: 11–27.Google Scholar

Turner, M. (1998). Poetry for the newborn brain: A commentary on Terrence Deacon, The Symbolic Species. Bostonia Spring (1): 72–3.Google Scholar

Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157): 1124–31.Google Scholar

Tye, M. (2004). On the non-conceptual content of experience. In Reicher, M. and Marek, J. (eds.), Experience and Analysis: Papers of the 27th International Wittgenstein Symposium, 221–39. Vienna: Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.Google Scholar

Vergis, N. (In press). Emotion and speaker meaning: A review of experimental research on conversational inference. Cognition and Emotion.Google Scholar

Viano, C. (2018). Aristote et la rhétoriques des émotions: Théorie et mode d’emploi. Revista Ideação. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13102/ideac.v0i0.3006.Google Scholar

Wałaszeska, E. (2004). What to do with response cries in relevance theory? In Mioduszewska, E. (ed.), Relevance Studies in Poland. Volume I, 119–29. Warsaw: University of Warsaw.Google Scholar

Weil, H. (1844). De l’Ordre des Mots dans les Langues Anciennes Comparées aux Langues Modernes. Paris: Crapelet.Google Scholar

Wharton, T. (2001). Paul Grice, Saying and Meaning. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 207–48.Google Scholar

Wharton, T. (2003a). Interjections, language and the ‘showing’/‘saying’ continuum. Pragmatics and Cognition 11(1) May: 39–91.Google Scholar

Wharton, T. (2003b). Natural pragmatics and natural codes. Mind and Language. 18(5): 447–77.Google Scholar

Wharton, T. (2006). The evolution of pragmatics. In Brown, K. (ed.), The Elsevier Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, 338–45. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Wharton, T. (2008). Meaning and showing: Gricean intentions and relevance–theoretic intentions. Intercultural Pragmatics 5(2): 131–52.Google Scholar

Wharton, T. (2009). Pragmatics and Non-verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wharton, T. (2015). That bloody so-and-so has retired: Expressives revisited. Lingua 75–6: 20–35.Google Scholar

Wharton, T. (2022). Relevance: Communication and cognition and …? Pragmatics and Cognition 28 (2): 321–47.Google Scholar

Wharton, T., Dukes, D., Sander, D., Bonard, C. and Oswald., S. (2021). Relevance and emotion. In special issue of Journal of Pragmatics 181: 259–69.Google Scholar

Wharton, T. and Strey., C. (2019). Slave of the passions: Making emotions relevant. In Scott, K., Clark, B. and Carston, R. (eds.), Relevance: Pragmatics and Interpretation, 253–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, A. (1992). The semantics of interjection. Journal of Pragmatics 18: 159–92.Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, A. (2000). The semantics of human facial expression. Pragmatics and Cognition 8(1): 147–83.Google Scholar

Wilkins, D. (1992). Interjections as deictics. Journal of Pragmatics 18: 119–58.Google Scholar

Williams, L. and Bargh., J. (2008) Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science 24(322) (5901): 606–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162548. PMID: 18948544; PMCID: PMC2737341.Google Scholar

Wilson, D. (1991). Slave of the Passions. Basingstoke: Picador Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, D. (2011a). The conceptual-procedural distinction: past, present and future. In Escandell, V., Leonetti, M. and Ahern, A. (eds.), Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, 3–31. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar

Wilson, D. (2011b). Literature as an object of knowledge. Talk given at workshop on ‘Concepts’, part of the Balzan project, St John’s College, Oxford, September 2011.Google Scholar

Wilson, D. (2018). Relevance theory and literary interpretation. In Cave, T. and Wilson, D. (eds.), Reading Beyond the Code: Literature and Relevance Theory, 185–204. Oxford, : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, D. and Carston, R.. (2019). Pragmatics and the challenge of non-propositional effects. Journal of Pragmatics 145: 31–8.Google Scholar

Wilson, D., and Sperber., D. (1981). On Grice’s theory of conversation. In Werth, P. (ed.), Conversation and Discourse, 155–78. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Wilson, D., and Sperber., D. (1988). Mood and the analysis of non-declarative sentences. In Dancy, J., Moravcsik, J. and Taylor, C. (eds.), Human Agency: Language, Duty and Value, 77–101. Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, D. and Sperber., D. (1993). Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90(1): 1–25.Google Scholar

Wilson, D. and Sperber., D. (2002). Truthfulness and relevance. Mind 111(443) (July): 583–632.Google Scholar

Wilson, D. and Wharton., T. (2006). Relevance and prosody. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1559–79.Google Scholar

Yus, F. (2016). Propositional attitude, affective attitude and irony comprehension. Pragmatics and Cognition 23(1): 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar