Beyond engaging survivors through communication and participation, the ICC and the ECCC have also considered certain forms of assistance to survivor populations. These assistance functions developed in close association with a range of humanitarian practices that eventually sought to compensate for the multiple limitations that juridical logics imposed on the delivery of reparations. These practices were more pronounced at the ICC and its Trust Fund for Victims, which had a dedicated assistance mandate, than at the ECCC in Cambodia. However, both courts have witnessed a close and, at times, confuse interplay between assistance and reparations. This chapter concludes with a comparative discussion of the ICC and ECCC’s practices of engaging with survivors.