Book contents
- Practice Theory and International Relations
- Cambridge Studies in International Relations: 148
- Practice Theory and International Relations
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I A Philosophical Analysis of Social Practices
- Part II Practices in International Relations
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International Relations
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 August 2018
Book contents
- Practice Theory and International Relations
- Cambridge Studies in International Relations: 148
- Practice Theory and International Relations
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I A Philosophical Analysis of Social Practices
- Part II Practices in International Relations
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International Relations
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Practice Theory and International Relations , pp. 222 - 237Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.), International Practices (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent, ‘International Practices: Introduction and Framework’, in Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.), International Practices (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent, ‘International Practices’, International Theory 3 (1) 2011: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Barnett, Michael (eds.), Security Communities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca (ed.), Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR (London: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, ‘Introduction’, in Adler-Nissen, Rebecca (ed.), Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR (London: Routledge, 2013), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Alderson, Kai, and Hurrell, Andrew (eds.), Hedley Bull on International Society (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Graham T., and Beschel, R. P., ‘Can the United States Promote Democracy?’, Political Science Quarterly 107 (1) 1992: 81–98.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth, Value in Ethics and Economics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Ethica Nicomachea (Nicomachean Ethics), in The Works of Aristotle, Vol. IX, trans. and ed. Ross, W. D. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925).Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Metaphysica (Metaphysics), in The Works of Aristotle, Vol. VIII, 2nd ed., ed. Ross, W. D. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1928).Google Scholar
Arrington, Robert L., ‘A Defence of Ethical Relativism’, Metaphilosphy 14 (3/4) 1983: 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, Robert J., ‘Game Theory’, in Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray and Newman, Peter (eds.), The New Palgrave: Game Theory (London: Macmillan, 1989), pp. 1–53.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L., ‘A Plea for Excuses’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57 1956–1957: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L., How to Do Things with Words, 2nd ed., ed. Urmson, J. O. and Sbisà, Marina (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975 [1962]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, David A., ‘Power and International Relations’, in Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas and Simmons, Beth A. (eds.), Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage, 2013), pp. 273–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, G. P., and Hacker, P. M. S., Wittgenstein: Rules, Grammar, and Necessity (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985).Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles R., The Idea of Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, Charles R., ‘The Moral Standing of States Revisited’, Ethics & International Affairs 23 (4) 2009: 325–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J., Responsibility to Protect: The Global Effort to End Mass Atrocities (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J., The Responsibility to Protect: A Defence (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy, A Fragment of Government, ed. Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 [1776]).Google Scholar
Boghossian, Paul A., ‘Rules, Meaning and Intention: Discussion’, Philosophical Studies 124 (2) 2005: 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. Nice, Richard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977 [1972]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, In Other Words: Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology, trans. Adamson, Matthew (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, The Logic of Practice, trans. Nice, Richard (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990 [1980]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998 [1994]).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, trans. Nice, Richard (London: Routledge, 2010 [1984]).Google Scholar
Brooks, Thom, Hegel’s Political Philosophy: A Systematic Reading of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Brown, Chris, ‘Cosmopolitanism, World Citizenship and Global Civil Society’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (1) 2000: 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Chris, ‘The ‘‘Practice Turn’’, Phronesis and Classical Realism: Towards a Phronetic International Political Theory?’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 40 (3) 2012: 439–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Chris, International Society, Global Polity: An Introduction to International Political Theory (London: Sage, 2015).Google Scholar
Brown, Garrett W. and Held, David (eds.), The Cosmopolitanism Reader (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Buchwalter, Andrew, ‘Hegel’s Conception of an International “We”’, in Grier, Philip T. (ed.), Identity and Difference: Studies in Hegel’s Logic, Philosophy of Spirit, and Politics (New York: State University of New York Press, 2007), pp. 155–176.Google Scholar
Bueger, Christian, and Gadinger, Frank, International Practice Theory: New Perspectives (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2014).Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley, ‘Society and Anarchy in International Relations’, in Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin (eds.), Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics (London: Allen and Unwin, 1966), pp. 35–50.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley, ‘The Emergence of a Universal International Society’, in Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds.), The Expansion of International Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984), pp. 117–126.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 3rd ed. (Houndmills: Palgrave, 2002 [1977]).Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Lindsey, and Chetail, Vincent, Privatizing War: Private Military and Security Companies under Public International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf, ‘Testability and Meaning’, Philosophy of Science 3 (4) 1936: 419–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas, Critical Mission: Essays on Democracy Promotion (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2004).Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas, and Ottaway, Marina (eds.), Uncharted Journey: Promoting Democracy in the Middle East (Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2005).Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean L., ‘Whose Sovereignty? Empire versus International Law’, Ethics & International Affairs 18 (3) 2004: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald, Essays on Actions and Events, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, Kathryn, Joseph, Jonathan, Roberts, John Michael and Wight, Colin, Realism, Philosophy and Social Science (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Of Grammatology, corr. ed., trans. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
De Saussure, Ferdinand, Course in General Linguistics, ed. Harris, Roy (London: Bloomsbury, 2013 [1916]).Google Scholar
Dessler, David, ‘What’s at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?’, International Organization 43 (3) 1989: 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America, trans. Reeve, Henry, ed. Kramnick, Isaac (New York: Norton, 2007).Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W., et al., Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
De Vattel, Emer The Laws of Nations, ed. Kapossy, B. and Wahtmore, R. (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2008 [1758]).Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm, Introduction to the Human Sciences, Selected Works, Vol. I, ed. Makkreel, Rudolf A. and Rodi, Frithjof (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack, ‘The Discourse of Anarchy in IR’, International Theory 7 (3) 2015: 393–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dresher, Melvin, Games of Strategy: Theories and Applications (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1961).Google Scholar
Droysen, Johann G., Grundriss Der Historik (Outline of the Principles of History), trans. Andrews, E. Benjamin as Droysen’s Principles of History (Boston, MA: Ginn, 1893 [1858]).Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael, Origins of Analytical Philosophy, reprint ed. (London: Bloomsbury, 2014 [1993]).Google Scholar
Edkins, Jenny, Poststructuralism & International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In (London: Lynne Rienner, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Gareth, The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and for All (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Falk, Richard, ‘The Global Promise of Social Movements: Explorations at the Edge of Time’, Alternatives 12 (2) 1987: 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fierke, Karin M., ‘Links across the Abyss: Language and Logic in International Relations’, International Studies Quarterly 46 (3) 2002: 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fierke, Karin M., ‘Wittgenstein and International Relations Theory’, in Moore, Cerwyn and Farrands, Chris (eds.), International Relations Theory and Philosophy (New York: Routledge, 2010), pp. 83–94.Google Scholar
Forum on Scientific Realism. Millennium – Journal of International Studies 2007 35 (2): 343–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel, ‘Truth and Power’, in Foucault, Michel, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings 1972–1977, trans. Gordon, Colin, Marshall, Leo, Mepham, John and Soper, Kate, ed. Gordon, Colin (New York: Vintage Books, 1980), pp. 109–133.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason, trans. Howard, Richard (New York: Vintage Books, 1988 [1961]).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception, trans. Sheridan, Alan M. (London: Routledge, 1989 [1963]).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Sheridan, Alan (New York: Vintage Books, 1995 [1975]).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, ‘Governmentality’, in Foucault, Michel, The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954–1984, ed. Rabinow, Paul (London: Penguin, 2002), pp. 201–222.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, ‘Lecture from 14 January 1976’, in Foucault, Michel, Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976, trans. Macey, David, ed. Bertani, Mauro and Fontana, Alessandro (New York: Picador, 2003), pp. 23–42.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob, Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: Eine Logisch Mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl (Breslau: Wilhelm Koebner, 1884).Google Scholar
Frey, R. G., and Morris, Christopher W., ‘Value, Welfare, and Morality’, in Frey, R. G. and Morris, C. W. (eds.), Value, Welfare and Morality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, Mervyn, Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, Mervyn, Constituting Global Rights: Global Civil Society and the Society of Democratic States (London: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar
Frost, Mervyn, Global Ethics: Anarchy, Freedom and International Relations (London: Routledge, 2009).Google Scholar
Frost, Mervyn, and Lechner, Silviya, ‘Two Conceptions of International Practice: Aristotelian Praxis or Wittgensteinian Language-Games’, Review of International Studies 42 (2) 2016: 334–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, Mervyn, and Lechner, Silviya, ‘Understanding International Practices from the Internal Point of View’, Journal of International Political Theory 12 (3) 2016: 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis, The End of History and the Last Man, 20th anniversary ed. (New York: Penguin Books, 2012 [1992]).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Philosophical Hermeneutics, trans. and ed. Linge, David E. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Gauss, Gerald F., ‘Hobbesian-Inspired Liberalism: Public Reason Out of Individual Reason’, in Gauss, Gerald F., Contemporary Theories of Liberalism (London: Sage, 2003), pp. 56–82.Google Scholar
Gauss, Gerald F., On Philosophy, Politics and Economics (Belmond, CA: Wadsworth, 2008).Google Scholar
Gettier, Edmund L., ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?’Analysis 23 (6) 1963: 121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gintis, Herbert, Game Theory Evolving: A Problem-Centered Introduction to Modeling Strategic Interaction (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, The Rights of War and Peace, 3 vols., ed. Tuck, R. (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2005 [1631]).Google Scholar
Gunnell, John G., ‘Can Social Science Be Just?’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (4) 2009: 595–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnell, John G., ‘Social Scientific Inquiry and Meta-Theoretical Fantasy: The Case of International Relations’, Review of International Relations 37 (4) 2011: 1447–1469.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert, The Nature of Morality: An Introduction to Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert, and Thompson, Judith Jarvis, Moral Relativism and Moral Objectivity (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals,’ Harvard Law Review 71 (4) 1958: 593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
H-Diplo/ISSF Roundtable: Review of Vincent Pouliot. International Security in Practice 2 (5) 2011: 1–53. www.h-net.org/~diplo/ISSF.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, trans. Knox, T. M. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967 [1821]).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Miller, A. V. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977 [1807]).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Hegel’s Science of Logic, trans. Miller, A. V. (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International, 1989 [1812–1816]).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Being and Time, trans. Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward (San Francisco, CA: Harper and Row, 1962).Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner Karl, ‘Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen’, Zeitschrift für Physik 33 (1) 1925: 879–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herz, John H., ‘Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma’, World Politics 2 (2) 1950: 157–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindriks, Frank, ‘Constitutive Rules, Language and Ontology’, Erkenntnis 71 (2) 2009: 253–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjorth, Ronnie, ‘Hedley Bull’s Paradox of the Balance of Power: A Philosophical Inquiry’, Review of International Studies 33 (4) 2007: 597–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohfeld, W. N., Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1919).Google Scholar
Holzgrefe, J. L., and Keohane, Robert O. (eds.), Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Watch. ‘World Report 2016: Saudi Arabia’. www.hrw.org/world-report/2016/country-chapters/saudi-arabia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1888 [1739]).Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Phil, Read, Rupert and Sharrock, Wes, There Is No Such Thing as a Social Science: In Defence of Peter Winch (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008).Google Scholar
Jackson, Peter, ‘Pierre Bourdieu, the “Cultural Turn” and the Practice of International History’, Review of International Studies 34 (1) 2008: 155–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Robert H., Quasi States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert, The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Joseph, Jonathan, ‘In Defence of Critical Realism’, Capital & Class 22 (2) 1998: 73–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Jonathan, ‘Philosophy in International Relations: A Scientific Realist Approach’, Millennium – Journal of International Studies 35 (2) 2007: 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch, in Kant, Immanuel, Political Writings, trans. Nisbet, H. B., ed. Reiss, H. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991 [1795]), pp. 93–130.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason, unified ed., trans. Pluhar, Werner S. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1996 [1781–1787]).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, The Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Gregor, Mary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 [1797]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, The Doctrine of Right, in Kant, Immanuel, The Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Gregor, Mary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996 [1797]), pp. 3–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Gregor, Mary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997 [1785]).Google Scholar
Kaplan, Morton A., System and Process in International Politics (New York: Wiley, 1957).Google Scholar
Kasher, Naomi, ‘Deontology and Kant’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 126 (4) 1978: 551–558.Google Scholar
Kessler, Oliver, and Guillaume, Xavier, ‘Everyday Practices of International Relations: People in Organizations’, Journal of International Relations & Development 15 (1) 2012: 110–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiersey, Nicholas J., (ed.), Foucault and International Relations (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Kinsey, Christopher, Corporate Soldiers and International Security: The Rise of Private Military Companies (London: Routledge, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline, ‘Approaching Perpetual Peace: Kant’s Defence of a League of States and His Ideal of a World Federation’, European Journal of Philosophy 12 (3) 2004: 304–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klotz, Audie, ‘Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U.S. Sanctions against South Africa’, International Organization 49 (3) 1995: 451–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, Niko and Jay Wallace, R., ‘Promises and Practices Revisited’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 31 (2) 2003: 119–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Constitutionalism as Mindset: Reflections on Kantian Themes about International Law and Globalization’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law 8 (1) 2007: 9–36.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich V., Rules, Norms, Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krausz, Michael, and Meiland, Jack W. (eds.), Relativism: Cognitive and Moral (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd ed. (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1996 [1962]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A., Hierarchy in International Relations (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Lapid, Yosef, ‘The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-positivist Era’, International Studies Quarterly 33 (3) 1989: 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrenz, Jürgen, ‘Hegel, Recognition and Rights: “Anerkennung” as a Gridline of the Philosophy of Rights’, Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 3 (2) 2007: 153–169.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, The Politics and Ethics of Identity: In Search of Ourselves (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lechner, Silviya, ‘Basic Rights and Global Justice: The Problem of International Coercion’, in Happold, Matthew (ed.), International Law in a Multipolar World (London: Routledge, 2012), pp. 158–178.Google Scholar
Lewis, David, Convention: A Philosophical Study (Oxford: Blackwell, 2002 [1969]), pp. 52–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John, Second Treatise of Government, ed. Macpherson, C. B. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1980 [1690]).Google Scholar
Luttwak, Edward N., Turbo Capitalism: Winners and Losers in the Global Economy (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1998).Google Scholar
Lyons, David, ‘The Correlativity of Rights and Duties’, Noûs 4 (1) 1970: 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair, Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988).Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue, 3rd ed. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007 [1981]).Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Edward A., The Problem of Scientific Realism (New York: Appleton-Century Crofts, 1972).Google Scholar
Malcolm, Norman, ‘Wittgenstein on Language and Rules’, Philosophy 64 (247) 1989: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandel, Robert, Armies without States: The Privatization of Security (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Jane R., ‘Basic Actions and Simple Actions’, American Philosophical Quarterly 9 (1) 1972: 59–69.Google Scholar
Martin, Rex, ‘Human Rights and the Social Recognition Thesis’, Journal of Social Philosophy 44 (1) 2013: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin-Mazé, Médéric, ‘Returning Struggles to the Practice Turn: How Were Bourdieu and Boltanski Lost in (Some) Translations and What to Do about It?’, International Political Sociology 11 (2) 2017: 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauss, Marcel, The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, trans. Halls, W. D. (London: Routledge, 2008 [1950]).Google Scholar
McKinsey, J. C. C., Introduction to the Theory of Games (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1952).Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J., The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W. W. Norton, 2001).Google Scholar
Miller, Alexander, and Wright, Crispin (eds.), Rule-Following and Meaning (Chesham: Acumen, 2002).Google Scholar
Milner, Helen, ‘The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique’, Review of International Studies 17 (1) 1991: 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina, The Quest for Good Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monten, Jonathan ‘The Roots of the Bush Doctrine: Power, Nationalism and Democracy Promotion in U.S. Strategy’, International Security 29 (4) 2005: 112–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Patrick M., ‘The Practice of Deterrence’, in Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.), International Practices (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 139–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulines, Carlos Ulises, ‘Structuralism: The Basic Ideas’, in Balzer, Wolfgang and Moulines, Carlos Ulises (eds.), Structuralist Theory of Science: Focal Issues, New Results (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1996), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas, ‘The Problem of Global Justice’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 33 (2) 2005: 113–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardin, Terry, Law, Morality, and the Relations of States (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Nardin, Terry, ‘International Pluralism and the Rule of Law’, Review of International Studies 26 (5) 2000: 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardin, Terry, The Philosophy of Michael Oakeshott (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Nardin, Terry, ‘The Moral Basis of Humanitarian Intervention’, Ethics & International Affairs 16 (2) 2002: 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardin, Terry, ‘Justice and Coercion’, in Bellamy, Alex J. (ed.), International Society and Its Critics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 247–264.Google Scholar
Nardin, Terry, ‘Globalization and the Public Realm’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12 (2) 2009: 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardin, Terry, ‘The Diffusion of Sovereignty’, History of European Ideas 41 (1) 2015: 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardin, Terry, and Williams, Melissa S. (eds.), Humanitarian Intervention: NOMOS XLVII (New York: New York University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Neal, Andrew W., ‘Michel Foucault’, in Edkins, Jenny and Vaughan-Williams, Nick (eds.), Critical Theorists and International Relations (London: Routledge, 2009), pp. 161–170.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver B., ‘Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31 (3) 2002: 627–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, Robert, ‘Coercion’, in Morgenbesser, Sidney, Suppes, Patrick and White, Morton (eds.), Philosophy, Science and Method: Essays in Honour of Ernest Nagel (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1969), pp. 440–472.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael, Experience and Its Modes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1933).Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael, ‘The Rule of Law’, in Oakeshott, Michael, On History and Other Essays (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1983), pp. 129–178.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael, ‘The Tower of Babel’ (1948), in Oakeshott, Michael, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, new expanded ed. (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1991 [1962]), pp. 465–487.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael, ‘Rational Conduct’ (1950), in Oakeshott, Michael, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, new expanded ed. (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1991 [1962]), pp. 99–131.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, new ed. (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press, 1991 [1962]).Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael, ‘Education: The Engagement and Its Frustration’ (1972), in Oakeshott, Michael, The Voice of Liberal Learning (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2001), pp. 62–104.Google Scholar
O’Hear, Anthony, Verstehen and Humane Understanding (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas, World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Parekh, Bhikhu, ‘The Political Philosophy of Michael Oakeshott’, British Journal of Political Science 9 (4) 1979: 481–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patomäki, Heikki, After International Relations: Critical Realism and the (Re)Construction of World Politics (London: Routledge, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patomäki, Heikki, and Wight, Colin, ‘After Postpositivism? The Promises of Critical Realism’, International Studies Quarterly 44 (2) 2000: 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelczynski, Z. A., (ed.), Hegel’s Political Philosophy: Problems and Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Pelczynski, Z. A., (ed.), The State and Civil Society: Studies in Hegel’s Political Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip, Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Pin-Fat, Véronique, Universality, Ethics and International Relations (London: Routledge, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, , The Republic of Plato, trans. Cornford, Francis MacDonald (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1945).Google Scholar
Plato, , Theaetetus, trans. Levett, M. J., ed. Williams, Bernard (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1992).Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas, World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael, Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy, rev. ed. (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael, The Tacit Dimension (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2009 [1966]).Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent, ‘“Sobjectivism”: Towards a Constructivist Methodology’, International Studies Quarterly 51 (2) 2007: 359–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent, ‘The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities’, International Organization 62 (2) 2008: 257–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent, International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent, and Frédéric, Mérand, ‘Bourdieu’s Concepts’, in Adler-Nissen, Rebecca (ed.), Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR (London: Routledge, 2013), pp. 24–44.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel, Eight Books on the Laws of Nature and Nations, trans. Oldfather, C. H. and Oldfather, W. A. (Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution, 1964 [1688]).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel, On the Duty of Man and Citizen according to Natural Law, trans. Silverthorne, Michael, ed. Tully, James (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000 [1673]).Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary, ‘What Is Mathematical Truth?’, in Hilary Putnam, Mathematics, Matter and Method: Philosophical Papers, Vol. I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), pp. 60–78.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol, Two-Person Game Theory: The Essential Ideas (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John, Political Liberalism, pbk. ed. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, The Concept of a Legal System: An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, The Responsibility to Protect (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001).Google Scholar
Ringmar, Erik, ‘The Search for Dialogue as a Hindrance to Understanding: Practices as Inter-paradigmatic Research Program’, International Theory 6 (1) 2014: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur, ‘Authority and Coercion’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 32 (1) 2004: 2–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard, (ed.), The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Roundtable: International Relations as a Social Science. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43 (1) 2014: 328–368.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert, ‘Are There Propositions?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1930, 30: 91–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert, ‘Are There Propositions?’, in Gilbert Ryle, Collected Papers, Vol. II (1929–1968) (London: Hutchinson, 1971), pp. 12–38.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M., ‘Practices and Promises’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 19 (3) 1990: 199–226.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M., What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R., Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R., Knorr-Cetina, Karin and von Savigny, Eike (eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel, (ed.), Consequentialism and Its Critics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas, The Strategy of Conflict (New York: Oxford University Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich, Hermeneutics and Criticism, trans. and ed. Bowie, Andrew (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 [1838]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Brian C., The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations (Albany: SUNY Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Schmidtz, David, ‘A Place for Cost-Benefit Analysis’, Noûs 35 (suppl. s1) 2001: 148–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R., ‘How to Derive “Ought” from “Is”’, Philosophical Review 73 (1) 1964: 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R., ‘How to Derive “Ought” from “Is”’, in Foot, Philippa (ed.), Theories of Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967), pp. 101–114.Google Scholar
Searle, John R., Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R., ‘Consciousness as a Biological Problem’, in Searle, John R., The Mystery of Consciousness (New York: New York Review of Books, 1997), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Searle, John R., ‘Social Ontology. Some Basic Principles’, Anthropological Theory (6)1 2006: 12–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sending, Ole Jacob, and Neumann, Iver B., ‘Banking on Power: How Some Practices in an International Organization Anchor Others’, in Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.), International Practices (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 231–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shue, Henry, Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy, 2nd ed. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie, A New World Order (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Smith, Steve, ‘Positivism and Beyond’, in Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken and Zalewski, Marysia (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 11–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken and Zalewski, Marysia (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stopford, John M., and Strange, Susan with Henley, John S., Rival States, Rival Firms: Competition for World Market Shares (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppe, Frederick, (ed.), The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Swartz, David L., Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swartz, David L., Symbolic Power, Politics and Intellectuals: The Political Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles, ‘Interpretation and the Sciences of Man’, The Review of Metaphysics 25 (1) 1971: 3–51.Google Scholar
Thompson, Judith Jarvis, Acts and Other Events (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Tönnies, Ferdinand, Community and Association (Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft) (London: Routledge, 1955 [1887]).Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly 2005 A/60/L.1 (World Summit Outcome), available at www.un.org.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly 2009 A/63/677 (UN Secretary General’s Report on the Responsibility to Protect), available at www.un.org.Google Scholar
US Department of State. ‘Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2014’. www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/humanrightsreport/#wrapper.Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bas C., The Scientific Image (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Neumann, John, and Morgenstern, Oskar, Theory of Games and Economic Behavoir, 60th anniversary commemorative ed. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007 [1944]).Google Scholar
Wæver, Ole, ‘Still a Discipline after All These Debates?’, in Dunne, Tim, Kurki, Milja and Smith, Steve (eds.), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010), pp. 297–318.Google Scholar
Walker, R. B. J., ‘Social Movements/World Politics’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 23 (3) 1994: 669–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic Books, 1983).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, ‘The Politics of Michel Foucault’, in Hoy, David Couzens (ed.), Foucault: A Critical Reader (London: Basil Blackwell, 1986), pp. 51–68.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Interpretation and Social Criticism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, 2nd ed. (New York: Basic Books, 1992).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, ‘Equality and Civil Society’, in Chambers, Simone and Kymlicka, Will (eds.), Alternative Conceptions of Civil Society (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002), pp. 34–49.Google Scholar
Warrender, Howard, The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: His Theory of Obligation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Watson, Adam, ‘The European International Society and Its Expansion’, in Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds.), The Expansion of International Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984), pp. 13–32.Google Scholar
Watson, Adam, The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis (London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, ed. Roth, G. and Wittich, C. (Berkley: University of California Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, ‘The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory’, International Organization 41 (3) 1987: 335–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, ‘Bridging the Theory/Meta-theory Gap in International Relations’, Review of International Studies 17 (4) 1991: 383–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, ‘Scientific Realism and Social Kinds’, in Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 47–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, ‘“Ideas All the Way Down”: On the Constitution of Power and Interest’, in Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 92–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Nicholas J., Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje, The Invisible Constitution of Politics: Contested Norms and International Encounters (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje, ‘Enacting Meaning-in-Use: Qualitative Research on Norms and International Relations’, Review of International Studies 35 (1) 2009: 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Robert R., Hegel’s Ethics of Recognition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Winch, Peter, The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1958).Google Scholar
Winch, Peter, ‘Understanding a Primitive Society’, in Winch, Peter, Ethics and Action (London: Routledge, 1972 [1964]), pp. 8–49.Google Scholar
Winch, Peter, ‘Facts and Superfacts’, in Winch, Peter, Trying to Make Sense (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987), pp. 54–63.Google Scholar
Windelband, Wilhelm, ‘Rectorial Address, Strasbourg, 1894’ (‘Windelband on History and Natural Science’), History and Theory 19 (2) 1980: 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windelband, Wilhelm, and Oakes, Guy, ‘History and Natural Science’, History and Theory 19 (2) 1980: 165–168.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. Ogden, C. K. (London: Routledge 1922).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F. (London: Routledge, 1961 [1921]).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations, 3rd ed., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M. (Oxford: Blackwell 1968 [1953]).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, ‘Cause and Effect: Intuitive Awareness’, trans. Winch, Peter, Philosophia 6 (3) and (4) 1976: 409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Christian, Jus Gentium Methodo Scientifica Pertractatum, trans. Drake, Joseph H. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1934 [1749]).Google Scholar
Wright, Crispin, ‘Wittgenstein on Following a Rule: Five Themes’, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Zagare, Frank C., Game Theory: Concepts and Applications (Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar