Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:56:16.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2.2 - Distribution and microhabitat of a monogenean on the gills of mackerel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

C. R. Kennedy
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
D. W. Halton
Affiliation:
Queen's University Belfast
J. M. Behnke
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
I. Marshall
Affiliation:
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Get access

Summary

Aims and objectives

This exercise is designed to demonstrate:

  1. Site selection by a parasite.

  2. Niche segregation by a parasite in the absence of competitors.

  3. Relationships between parasite numbers, site selection and host size.

  4. The manner in which parasites are dispersed throughout a host population.

Introduction

Although we often talk loosely about parasites living in or on a host, this should not be taken to imply that they can live in all tissues or organs of a host. Indeed, all parasites show some degree of site specificity in that they are only found in a particular organ or tissue and are able to select that site. Many of the adaptations they exhibit, e.g. an attachment mechanism, are actually adaptations to this particular site rather than to the host as such.

Interpretations of site selection within an ecological framework are not generally agreed. There is a large measure of agreement that the site of a parasite can be used as an indication or measure of its niche, but far less agreement about the ecological significance of, especially, very specific site selection (i.e., narrow niche breadth) and its relationship to resource partitioning and intra-and inter-specific competition between parasites. Many species appear to increase their niche breadth at higher densities and this is often taken as a manifestation of intra-specific competition. Similarly, species packing within an organ and a narrower niche breadth is considered by many workers to be a likely indication of inter-specific competition.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×