Abbott, A. (1995). “Things of Boundaries.” Social Research, 62(4), 857–882.Google Scholar

Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Abel, R. (1980). “Redirecting Social Studies of Law.” Law and Society Review, 14, 803–829.Google Scholar

Abel, R. (1985). “Comparative Sociology of Legal Professions: An Exploratory Essay.” American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 10(1), 1–79.Google Scholar

Abel, R. (1989). American Lawyers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Abel, R. (1995a). Politics by Other Means: Law in the Struggle against Apartheid, 1980–1994. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Abel, R. (1995b). The Law and Society Reader. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Abel, R. (1998). “Speaking Law to Power: Occasions for Cause Lawyering.” In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitment and Professional Responsibilities, edited by Sarat, Austin & Scheingold, Stuart (pp. 69–117). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Abel, R. (2010). “Law and Society: Project and Practice.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6(1), 1–23.Google Scholar

Abramovich, V., & Courtis, C. (2002). Los derechos sociales como derechos exigibles. Madrid: Trotta.Google Scholar

Abrams, K. (1991). “Hearing the Call of Stories.” California Law Review, 79, 971.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar

Ackerman, B. A. (1984). Reconstructing American Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ackerman, B. A., & Rosenkrantz, C. (1991). “Tres conceptos de la democracia constitucional.” In Fundamentos y alcances del control judicial de constitucionalidad, Cuadernos y debates – Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, (29), 15–31.Google Scholar

Agrikoliansky, E. (2003). “Usages choisis du droit: le service juridique de la ligue des droits de l’ homme (1970–1990): entre politique et raison humanitaire.” Sociétés Contemporaines, 52, 61–84.Google Scholar

Albarracín, M. (2011). Movilización legal para el reconocimiento de parejas del mismo sexo. Bogota: Universidad de los Andes.Google Scholar

Alberdi, J. B. (1981). Bases y puntos de partida para la organización política de la República Argentina. Buenos Aires: Plus Ultra.Google Scholar

Alexander, J. (1987). Twenty Lectures. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Alexander, M. (2012). The New Jim Crow. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar

Alexy, R. (1993). Teoría de los derechos fundamentales. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.Google Scholar

Alves da Fonseca, M. (2013a). Michel Foucault et le droit. Paris: L´Harmattan.Google Scholar

Amselek, P. (1997). “La part de la science dans les activités de juristes.” Recueil Dalloz, Chronique, (39), 337–342.Google Scholar

Anderson, P. (1979). El Estado Absolutista. Madrid: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . (1974). La politique. Paris. Retrieved from Ladrange.Google Scholar

Arnaud, A. J. (1973). Essai d’analyse structurale du Code civil français. Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence.Google Scholar

Arnaud, A. J. (1975). Les juristes face à la société. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Arnaud, A. J. (1981). Critique de la raison Juridique. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Arnaud, A. J. (1988). Dictionnaire encyclopédique de théorie et sociologie du droit. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Arnaud, A. J. (1989). “Le droit, un ensemble peu convivial.” Droit et Société, 1(11–12), 79–95.Google Scholar

Arnaud, A. J. (1991). “Du jeu fini au jeu ouvert. Réflexions additionnelles sur le Droit post-moderne.” Droit et Société, 1(17–18), 39–55.Google Scholar

Arnaud, A. J. (1993). “Droit: le système et l’ensemble.” In Niklas Luhmann, observateur du droit, Collection Droit et Société (25), edited by Arnaud, Andre Jean & Guibentif, Pierre (pp. 147–166). Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Arnaud, A. J. (1998a). Entre modernité et mondialisation. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Arnaud, A. J. (1998b). Le droit trahi par la sociologie. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Arnaud, A. J. (2009). “Présentation : Autour d’un dialogue imaginaire entre Michel Villey et Friedrich A. Hayek.” Droit et Société, 1(71), 9–25.Google Scholar

Arnaud, A. J. (2013a). “Du dia-logein au transgredir : en guise d’ouverture.” In Droit, arts, sciences humaines et sociales: (dé)passer les fontières disciplinaires, edited by Chassagnard-Pinet, Sandrine, Lemay, Pierre, Regulski, Céline, & Simonneau, Dorothée (pp. 39–53). Paris: LDGJ.Google Scholar

Arnaud, A. J. (2013b). “The Transplanetary Journey of a Legal Sociologist.” In Law and Intersystemic Communication: Understanding “Structural Coupling,” edited by Febbrajo, Alberto & Harste, Gorm (pp. 17–30). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Arnaud, A. J. (2014). La Gouvernance, un outil de participation. Paris: Lextenso Éditions.Google Scholar

Arnaud, A. J., & Andrini, S. (1995). Jean Carbonier, Renato Treves et la sociologie du droit. Archéologie d’une discipline. Entretiens et Pièces. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Arnaud, A. J., & Fariñas Dulce, M. (1998). Introduction à l’analyse sociologique des systèmes juridiques. Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar

Arnaud, A. J., & Fariñas Dulce, M. (2012). Jean Carbonnier: Un juriste dans la cité. Paris: LDGJ.Google Scholar

Arnold, M. (1971). “The Function of Criticism at the Present Time.” In Critical Theory since Plato, edited by Adams, Hazard (pp. 592–603). New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Assier-Andrieu, L. (1996). Le droit dans les sociétés humaines. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar

Assier-Andrieu, L. (2011). Les avocats. Identité, culture et devenir. Paris: L’Extenso.Google Scholar

Audren, F. (2016). “Le ‘moment 1900’ dans l´histoire de la science juridique française.” In Critique sociale et critique sociologique du droit en Europe et aux Etats-Unis, edited by Jouanjan, Olivier & Zoller, Élizabeth (pp. 55–74). Paris: Editions Panthéon-Assas.Google Scholar

Audren, F., & Halpérin, J.-L. (2013). La culture juridique française. Entre Mythes et réalités. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar

Auerbach, J. (1976). Unequal Justice: Lawyers and Social Change in Modern America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bacon, F. (2001). Essays, Civil and Moral. Cambridge: Collier and Son Company.Google Scholar

Bailleaux, A., & Ost, F. (2013). “Droit, contexte et interdisciplinarité : refondation d’une démarche.” Revue Interdisciplinaire D’études Juridiques, 70, 25–44.Google Scholar

Balbus, I. D. (1977). “Commodity Form and Legal Form: An Essay on the Relative Autonomy of the Law.” Law and Society Review, 11, 143–156.Google Scholar

Balbus, I. D. (1996). “Commodity Form and Legal Form: An Essay on the Relative Autonomy of the Law.” In The Sociology of Law, edited by Treviño, Javier (pp. 140–148). New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Balkin, J. M. (1987). “Deconstructive Practice and Legal Theory.” The Yale Journal, 96, 743–786.Google Scholar

Banakar, R. (2003). Merging Law and Sociology: Beyond the Dichotomies in Socio-legal Research. Berlin: Galda & Wilch.Google Scholar

Banakar, R., & Travers, M. (2002). “Law and Sociology.” In An Introduction to Law and Social Theory, edited by Banakar, Reza & Travers, Max (pp. 345–352). Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Bancaud, A. (1993). La haute magistrature entre politique et sacerdoce. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Bancaud, A., & Dezalay, Y. (1984). “La sociologie juridique comme enjeu social et professionel.” Revue Interdisciplinaire D’ Études Juridiques, 12, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bankowski, Z., & Mungham, G. (1976). Images of Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Baratta, A. (1986). Criminología crítica y crítica del derecho penal. Introducción a la sociología jurídico-penal. Mexico City: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar

Barclay, S., Jones, L., & Marshall, A.-M. (2011). “Two Spinning Wheels: Studying Law and Social Movements.” Studies in Law, Politics and Society, 54, 1–16.Google Scholar

Barrow, C. W. (1993). Critical Theories of the State: Marxist, Neo-Marxist Post-Marxist. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Bart, K., Van Beers, B., & Poort, L. (2016). Symbolic Legislation Theory and Development in Biolaw. Geneva: Springer.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1980). Mitologías. Mexico City: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar

Bartlett, K. (2012). “Feminist Legal Scholarship: A History through the Lens of the California Law Review.” California Law Review, 100, 381–429.Google Scholar

Bastard, B., & Ackerman, W. (1993). “Une coopération conflictuelle : les relations entre les barreaux et les tribunaux de grande instance.” Droit et Société, 1(23–24), 59–77.Google Scholar

Bastard, B., & Mouhanna, C. (2007). Une justice dans l’urgence. Le traitement en temps réel des affaires pénales. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Baudot, P.-Y., & Revillard, A. (Eds.). (2014). L’Etat des droits. La pratique des droits dans l’action publique. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar

Baum, D. (1997). Smoke and Mirrors: The War on Drugs and the Politics of Failure. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar

Bauman, R. W. (1996). Critical Legal Studies: A Guide to the Literature. New York: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Beaud, O. (2006). “La distinction entre droit public et droit privé : un dualisme que résiste aux critiques.” In The Public Law/Private Law divide. Une entente assez cordiale?, edited by Freedland, Mark & Auby, Jean-Bernard (pp. 21–39). Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

Becker, C. H. (1925). Vom Wesen der deutschen Universitat. Leipzig: Verlag Quelle und Meyer.Google Scholar

Becker, G. (1993a). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Becker, G. (1993b). “Nobel Lecture: The Economic Way of Looking at Behavior.” Journal of Political Economy, 101, 385.Google Scholar

Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Beckett, K., & Hoffman, B. (2014). “Challenging Medicine: Law, Resistance and the Cultural Politics of Childbirth.” In The Law and Society Reader II, edited by Larson, Erik & Schmidt, Patrick (pp. 276–284). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Beirne, P., & Quinney, R. (Eds.). (1982). Marxism and Law. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Belleau, M. C. (1999). “Les juristes inquiets: classisisme juridique et critique du droit au début du XXe siècle en France.” Les Cahiers de Droit, 40(3), 507–544.Google Scholar

Belley, J. G. (1986). “L’Etat et la régulation juridique des sociétés globales. Pour une problématique du pluralisme juridique.” Sociologie et Sociétés, 18(1), 11–32.Google Scholar

Bereni, L. (2009). “Faire de la diversité une richesse pour l’entreprise. La transformation d’une contrainte juridique en catégorie managériale.” Raisons politiques, 3(35), 87–105.Google Scholar

Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Berger, R., Searles, P., & Neuman, L. W. (1988). “The Dimensions of Rape Reform Legislation.” Law and Society Review, 22, 329–358.Google Scholar

Berman, H. (1983). Law and Revolution: The Formation of Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Berman, H. (2003). Law and Revolution: The Impact of the Protestant Reformation on the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bessy, Ch. (2015). L´Organisation des activités des avocats. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Biland, E., & Israël, L. (2011). “À l’école du droit : les apports de la méthode ethnographique à l’analyse de la formation juridique.” Les Cahiers Du Droit, 52(3–4), 619–658.Google Scholar

Biland, E. & Vanneuville, R. (2012). “Government Lawyers and the Training of Senior Civil Servants. Maintaining Law at the Heart of the French State.” International Journal of Legal Profession, 19(1), 29–54.Google Scholar

Bisharat, G. (1990). “Courting Justice? Legitimation in Lawyering under Israeli Occupation.” Law and Social Inquiry, 20(2), 349–405.Google Scholar

Bixio, Andre. (1994). Sociología del diritto. Guida alla laurea in Scienze Politiche. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar

Black, D. (1972). “The Boundaries of Legal Sociology.” Yale Law Journal, 81, 1086–1100.Google Scholar

Black, D. (1976). The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Black, D. (1995). “The Epistemology of Pure Sociology.” Law and Social Inquiry, 20, 829–870.Google Scholar

Blanco Valdés, R. L. (1998). El valor de la Constitución. Madrid: Alianza Universidad.Google Scholar

Blanquer, J.-M., & Millet, M. (2015). L´invention de l´Etat. Léon Duguit et Maurice Hauriou et lnaissance du droit public modern. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar

Blum, L. (1965). L’Oeuvre de Leon Blum. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar

Blumer, H. (1945). “Collective Behavior.” In New Outline of the Principles of Sociology, edited by Lee, Alfred McClung & Park, Robert Ezra (pp. 67–121). New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspectives and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Bobbio, N. (2005). Teoría general de la política. Madrid: Trotta.Google Scholar

Boigeol, A. (2007). “Le genre comme ressource dans l’accès des femmes au ‘gouvernement du barreau’: l’exemple du barreau de Paris.” Genèses, 67, 66–88.Google Scholar

Boigeol, A., & Dezalay, Y. (1997). “De l’agent d’affaires au barreau : les conseils juridiques et la construction d’un espace professionnel.” Genèses, 27, 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boigeol, A., & Willemez, L. (2005). “France: Fighting for Survival: Unification, Differentiation and Representation of the French Bar.” In Reorganization and Resistance: Legal Professions Confront a Changing World, edited by Felstiner, William (pp. 41–65). Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Boltanski, L. (1990). L’amour et la justice comme compétence. Paris: Métailié.Google Scholar

Bonafé-Schmitt, J.-P. (1992). La médiation: une justice douce, Syros Alternatives. Paris: Syros.Google Scholar

Bonnecase, J. (1924). l’Ecole de l’exégèse en droit civil. Paris: E. de Boccard.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1964). Les Héritiers. Les étudiants et la culture. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1986). “La force du droit: éléments pour une sociologie du champ juridique.” Actes de La Recherche En Sciences Sociales, 64, 3–19.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1987). “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field.” Hastings Law Journal, 38, 814–853.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1989). La noblesse d´état: Grand corps et grandes écoles. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1990). “Droit et passe-droit.” Actes de La Recherche En Sciences Sociales, 81–82, 86–96.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1991). “Les juristes, gardiens de l´hypocrisie collective.” In Normes juridiques et régulation sociale, edited by Chazel, François & Comaille, Jacques (pp. 95–99). Paris: LDGJ.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1994). Raison Pratiques: Sur la théorie de l´action. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1997). “De la maison du roi à la raison d’État. Un modèle de la genèse du champ bureaucratique.” Actes de La Recherche En Sciences Sociales, 1(118), 55–68.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (2000). Les Structures Sociales de l’Economie. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (2012). Sur l’État: Cours au Collège de France (1989–1992). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bowen, J., & Bentaboulet, M. (2002). “On the Institutionalization of the ‘Human and Social Science’ in France.” Anthropological Quarterly, 75(3), 537–555.Google Scholar

Boyle, J. (1985). “The Politics of Reason: Critical Legal Theory and Local Social Thought.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 133(4), 685–780.Google Scholar

Bredemeier, H. (1962). “Law as an Integrative Mechanism.” In Law and Sociology, edited by Evan, W. M. (pp. 73–90). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Brigham, J. (1987). The Cult of the Court. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Brigham, J. (1996). The Constitution of Interest: Beyond the Politics of Rights. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Brigham, J. (1998). “The Constitution of Interests: Institutionalism, CLS and New Approaches to Sociolegal Studies.” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, 10(2), 421–461.Google Scholar

Brisbin, R. (2010). “Resistance to Legality.” Annual Reviews of Law and Social Science, 6, 25–44.Google Scholar

Brown, W., & Halley, J. E. (Eds.). (2002). Left Legalism/Left Critique. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Brunet, P. (2014). “Le ‘positivisme’ français dans la lumière du Nord. Le réalisme juridique scandinave et la doctrine française.” Revus, 24, 2–18.Google Scholar

Brunet, P. (2015). “Argument sociologique et théories de l’interprétation: beaucoup d’interprétation très peu de sociologie.” In L’argument sociologique en droit. Pluriel et singularité, edited by Fenouillet, Dominique (pp. 101–116). Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar

Brunetière, F. (1897). “Dans l’Est americain.” Revue Des Deux Mondes, 92–123.Google Scholar

Buchanan, M. (1994). “Context, Continuity and Difference in Poverty Law Scholarship.” University of Miami Law Review, 48(5), 999–1062.Google Scholar

Bumiller, K. (1988). The Civil Rights Society: The Social Construction of Victims. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Burawoy, M., Burton, A., Ferguson, A. A., & Fox, K. J. (1991). Ethnography Unbound, Power Resistance in Modern Metropolis. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Burchell, G. (1991). The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Butler, J. (1992). “Contingent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of Postmodernism.” In Feminists Theorize the Political, edited by Butler, Judith & Scott, Joan W. (pp. 3–21). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Caillosse, J. (1996). “Droit public – droit privé. Sens et portée d´un partage académique.” Actualité juridique, 4, 67–90.Google Scholar

Caillosse, J. (2004). “Pierre Bourdieu, Lector juris: Anti-juridisme et science du droit.” Droit et Société, 56–57, 17–37.Google Scholar

Caillosse, J. (2011). “La sociologie politique du droit, le droit et les juristes.” Droit et Société, 77, 189–206.Google Scholar

Cain, M., & Hunt, A. (1979). Marx and Engels on Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Calabresi, G. (2016) The Future of Law and Economics: Essays in Reform and Recollection. New York: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Calabresi, G. (1970). The Cost of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Calavita, K. (1996). “The New Politics of Immigration: ‘Balanced-Budget Conservatism’ and the Symbolism of Proposition 187.” Social Problems, 43, 284–305.Google Scholar

Calavita, K. (2001). “Blue Jeans, Rape, and the ‘De-Constitutive’ Power of Law.” Law and Society Review, 35(1), 89–116.Google Scholar

Calavita, K. (2002). “Engaged Research, ‘Goose Bumps’ and the Role of the Public Intellectual.” Law and Society, 36, 5–20.Google Scholar

Calavita, K. (2010). Invitation to Law and Society: An Introduction to the Study of Real Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Campos, P., Schlag, P., & Smith, S. (1996). Against the Law. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Capeller, W., & De, M. (2009) L’engrénage de la repression. Stratégies sécuritaires et politiques criminelles au Brésil. Collection Droit et Société. Paris: LDGJ.Google Scholar

Capitant, H. (1898). Introduction à l’étude du droit civil – Notions générales. Paris: A. Pédone.Google Scholar

Carbonnier, J. (1978). Sociologie Juridique. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Carbonnier, J. (2001). Flexible droit. Pour une sociologie du droit sans rigueur. Paris: LDGJ.Google Scholar

Carbonnier, J. (2007). “La sociologie juridique et son emploi en législation. Communication de Jean Carbonnier à l’académie des sciences morales et politiques.” L’Année Sociologique, 57(2), 393–401.Google Scholar

Carlin, J. (1962). Lawyers on Their Own: The Solo Practitioner in an Urban Setting. San Francisco: Austin and Winfield Publishers.Google Scholar

Carré de Malberg, R. (1922). Contribution à la théorie générale de l’Etat. Paris: Sirey.Google Scholar

Carty, A. (1992). Law and Development. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Centeno, M. & Ferraro, A. (2013). State and Nation Making in Latin America and Spain. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chambliss, E. (2008). “When Do Facts Persuade? Some Thoughts on the Market for ‘Empirical Legal Studies.’” Law and Contemporary Problems, 71(2), 17–40.Google Scholar

Chambliss, W. (1999). Power, Politics and Crime. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Champy, F., & Israël, L. (2009). “Professions et engagement public.” Société Contemporaines, 1(73), 7–19.Google Scholar

Chappe, V. A. (2010). “La qualification juridique est-elle soluble dans le militantisme ? Tensions et paradoxes au sein de la permanence juridique d’une association antiraciste.” Droit et Société, 76(3), 543–567.Google Scholar

Charboneau, S., & Padioleau, J. G. (1980). “La mise en oeuvre d’une politique publique réglementaire: le défrichement des bois et forêts.” Revue française de sociologie, 1(21), 49–75.Google Scholar

Charle, C. (2003). “Les références étrangères des universitaires. Essai de comparaison entre la France et l’Allemagne. 1870–1970.” Actes de La Recherche En Sciences Sociales, 3(148), 8–19.Google Scholar

Chassagnard-Pinet, S. (2013). “La science du droit dans son rapport aux sciences humaines et sociales. Approche historique et comparée.” In Droit, arts, sciences humaines et sociales: (dé)passer les fontières disciplinaires, edited by Chassagnard-Pinet, Sandrine, Lemay, Pierre, Regulski, Céline, & Simonneau, Dorothée (pp. 39–53). Paris: LDGJ.Google Scholar

Chassagnard-Pinet, S., Lemay, P., Regulsky, C., & Simonneau, D. (2013). Droit, arts, sciences humaines et sociales: (dé)passer les frontières disciplinaires. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Chazel, F. (1991). “Émile Durkheim et l’élaboration d’un ‘programme de recherche’ en sociologie du droit.” In Normes juridiques et régulation sociale, edited by Chazel, François & Comaille, Jacques (pp. 27–38). Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Chazel, F., & Commaille, J. (Eds.). (1991). Normes juridiques et régulation sociale. Paris: LDGJ.Google Scholar

Chevallier, J. (1993). “Les interprètes du droit.” In La doctrine juridique, edited by Poirmeur, Yves & Bernard, Alain (pp. 259–282). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Chevallier, J. (1997). “La fin des écoles?” Revue Du Droit Public, 3, 679–700.Google Scholar

Chevallier, J. (2003). L´Etat post-moderne. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Chevallier, J. (2006). “Pour une sociologie du droit constitutionnel.” In L’architecture du droit. Mélanges en l’honneur de Michel Troper, edited by de Béchillon, Denys, Champeil-Desplats, Véronique, Brunet, Pierre, & Millard, Eric (pp. 281–298). Paris: Economica.Google Scholar

Chodorow, N. J. (1989). Feminism and Psychoanalytic Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1993). “World Order and Its Rules: Variations on Some Themes.” Journal of Law and Society, 20(2), 145–165.Google Scholar

Clark, D. (Ed.). (2012a). Comparative Law and Society. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Clark, D. (2012b). “History of Comparative Law and Society.” In Comparative Law and Society, edited by Clark, David (pp. 1–38). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Coase, R. (1960). “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.Google Scholar

Cohen, F. (1937). “Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law.” Illinois Law Review, 31, 1128–1134.Google Scholar

Cohen, A., & Vauchez, A. (2011). “The Social Construction of Law: The European Court of Justice and Its Legal Revolution Revisited.” Annual Reviews of Law and Social Science, 7, 417–431.Google Scholar

Cohen-Tanugi, L. (2007). Le droit sans l’Etat. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Cohen-Tanugi, L. (2015). What’s Wrong with France. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar

Coleman, J., & Lange, J. (1993). Law and Economics. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Collins, H. (1986). The Law of Contract. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar

Collins, R. (1994). Four Sociological Traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Colliot-Thélène, C. (2009). “Pour une politique des droits subjectifs: la lutte pour les droit comme lutte politique.” L’Année Sociologique, 59(1), 232–258.Google Scholar

Comack, E. (2006). “Theoretical Approaches in the Sociology of Law: Theoretical Excursions.” In Locating Law: Race/Class/Gender/Sexuality Connections, edited by Comack, Elizabeth (pp. 18–67). Black Point, NS: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar

Commaille, J. (1983). “The Law and Science: Dialectics between the Prince and the Maidservant.” Law and Policy, 10, 253–265.Google Scholar

Commaille, J. (1989). “La sociologie du droit en France. Les ambiguïtés d’une specialisation.” Sociologia Del Diritto, 16, 19.Google Scholar

Commaille, J. (2000). Territoires de justice; une sociologie politique de la carte judiciaire. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Commaille, J. (2003a). “Droit et politique.” In Dictionnaire de la culture juridique, edited by Alland, D. and Rials, S. (pp. 477–481). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Commaille, J. (2003b). “Sociologie juridique.” In Dictionnaire de la culture juridique, edited by Alland, D. and Rials, S. (pp. 1423–1427). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Commaille, J. (2007a). “La construction d’une sociologie spécialisée. Le savoir sociologique et la sociologie juridique de Jean Carbonnier.” L’Année Sociologique, 57(2), 275–299.Google Scholar

Commaille, J. (2007b). “La justice entre détraditionnalisation, néoliberalisation et démocratisation. Vers une théorie de sociologie politique de la justice.” In La fonction politique de la justice, edited by Commaille, Jacques & Kaluszynski, Martin (pp. 295–321). Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Commaille, J. (2010). “De la ‘sociologie juridique’ à une sociologie politique du droit.” In La juridisation du politique, edited by Commaille, Jacques, Dumolin, Laurence, & Robert, Cécile (pp. 29–51). Paris: LDGJ.Google Scholar

Commaille, J. (2012). “Preface.” In Jean Carbonnier. Un juriste dans la cité, edited by Arnaud, Andre Jean (pp. 5–12). Paris: LDGJ.Google Scholar

Commaille, J. (2013). Sociologie politique du droit. Quels acquis? Quels perspectives? Propos conclusifs – Journées en l’honneur de Jacques Commaille. Paris: ENS – Cachan.Google Scholar

Commaille, J. (2015). A quoi nous sert le droit? Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Commaille, J. (2016). “Les enjeux politiques d´un régime de connaissance sur le droit. La sociologie du droit de Georges Gurvitch.” Droit et Société, 94, 547–564.Google Scholar

Commaille, J., Commaille, J. F. P., Dumoulin, L., & Robert, C. (2000). La juridicisation du politique: Leçons scientifiques. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Commaille, J., & Duran, P. (2009). “Pour une sociologie politique du droit: presentation.” L’Année Sociologique, 59(1), 11–28.Google Scholar

Commaille, J., & Kaluszynski, M. (Eds.). (2007). La fonction politique de la justice. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Commaille, J., & Perrin, J.-F. (1985). “Le modèle de Janus de la sociologie du droit.” Droit et Société, 1(1), 119–134.Google Scholar

Commaille, J., Demoulin, L., & Robert, C. (2010). La juridicisation du politique. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Conti, J. (2014). “The Good Case: Decisions to Litigate at the World Trade Organization.” In The Law and Society Reader II, edited by Larson, Erik & Schmidt, Patrick (pp. 24–31). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Coombe, R. J. (1998). “Contingent Articulations: A Critical Cultural Studies of Law.” In Law in the Domains of Culture, edited by Sarat, A. & Kearns, T. R. (pp. 21–64). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Correas, O. (1993). “La sociología jurídica. Un ensayo de definición.” Revista Latinoamericana de Política, Filosofía y Derecho, 12, 23–53.Google Scholar

Corten, O. (2003). “La persistance de l’argument légaliste : éléments pour une typologie contemporaine des registres de légitimité dans une société libérale.” Droit et Société, 50, 185–203.Google Scholar

Coskun, D. (2007). Law as Symbolic Form: Ernst Cassirer and the Anthropocentric View of Law. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Costa, P. (2012). “Histoire, théorie et histoire de théories.” In Comment écrit-on l’histoire Constitutionnelle?, edited by Herrera, Carlos-Miguel and Le Pillouer, Arnaud (pp. 19–56). Paris: Kimé.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, R. (1983). “The Sociological Concept of Law.” Journal of Law and Sociology, 10, 241.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, R. (1989). The Politics of Jurisprudence: A Critical Introduction to Legal Philosophy. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, R. (1990). “Sociology of Law in Britain: Its Development and Present Prospects.” In Developing Sociology of Law: A World-Wide Documentary Enquiry, edited by Ferrari, V. (pp. 779–803). Milano: Giuffre.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, R. (1991). “The Durkheimian Tradition in the Sociology of Law.” Law and Society Review, 25(4), 923–946.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, R. (1992). The Sociology of Law: An Introduction. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, R. (1998). “Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically?” Journal of Law and Society, 25, 171–192.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, R. (2004). “Law in Social Theory and Social Theory in the Study of Law.” In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, edited by Sarat, Austin (pp. 15–29). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, R. (2006). Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, R. (2007). “Images of Europe in Sociolegal Traditions.” In European Ways of Law: Towards a European Sociology of Law, edited by Nelken, David & Gessner, Volkmar (pp. 21–39). Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, R. (2012). “Comparative Sociology of Law.” In Comparative Law and Society, edited by Clark, David (pp. 39–60). New York: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Coutin, S. (2001). “Cause Lawyering in the Shadow of the State.” In Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era, edited by Sarat, Austin & Scheingold, Stuart (pp. 117–140). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cramer, R. (1986). “Eléments biographiques et bibliographiques pour une étude de l’apport de Georges Gurvitch à la théorie et à la sociologie du droit.” Droit et Société, 4, 457–467.Google Scholar

Crenshaw, K. (2002). “The First Decade: Critical Reflections, or ‘A Foot on the Closing Door’.” UCLA Law Review, 49, 1343.Google Scholar

Crenshaw, K. W. (1988). “Race, Reform and Retrenchment: Transformation and Legitimation in Anti-Discrimination Law.” Harvard Law Review, 101(7), 1331–1387.Google Scholar

Crenshaw, K. et al. (1995). “Introduction.” In Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement, edited by Crenshaw, Kimberly (pp. 13–32). New York: New Press.Google Scholar

Crozier, B. (1935). “Constitutionality of Discrimination Based Sex.” Boston University Law Review, 15, 723.Google Scholar

Cuin, C. H., & Gresle, F. (2002). Histoire de la sociologie. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Curry, T. (2012). “Shut Your Mouth When You’re Talking to Me: Silencing the Idealist School of Critical Race Theory through a Culturalogic Turn in Jurisprudence.” Georgetown Law Journal of Modern Critical Race Studies, 3(1), 1–38.Google Scholar

Dahrendorf, R. (1969). “Law Faculties and the German Upper Class.” In Sociology of Law, edited by Aubert, Vilhelm (pp. 294–309). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Darian-Smith, E. (2013). Laws and Societies in Global Contexts. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Darian-Smith, E. (2015). “The Constitution of Identity: New Modalities of Nationality.” In The Handbook of Law and Society, edited by Sarat, Austin & Ewick, Patricia (pp. 351–366). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

De Aquino, T. (1988). Summa Theologica I IIae. Madrid: BAC.Google Scholar

De Galembert, C. (2008). “Le voile en procès.” Droit et Société, 66, 11–31.Google Scholar

De la torre, J. A. (2006). El derecho como arma de liberación en América Latina. Sociología del derecho y uso alternativo del derecho. San Luis de Potosí: Universidad Autónoma de San Luis de Potosí.Google Scholar

De Saussure, F. (1945). Curso de Lingüística General. Buenos Aires: Losada.Google Scholar

De Sutter, L., & Gutwirth, S. (2004). “Droit et cosmopolitique. Notes sur la contribution de Bruno Latour à la pensée du droit.” Droit et Société, 56–57, 259–289.Google Scholar

Dean, M. (2009). Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Deflem, M. (2008). Sociology of Law: Visions of a Scholarly Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Deflem, M. (2010). Sociology of Law. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Del Vecchio, G. (1964). Historia de la filosofía del derecho. Barcelona: Bosch.Google Scholar

Delgado, R. (1987). “The Ethereal Scholar: Does Critical Legal Studies Have What Minorities Want?” Harvard Civil Liberties Law Review, 22, 302–322.Google Scholar

Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2013). Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Dellay, J. D., & Mader, L. (1981). “Que faire des objectifs dans une étude de mise en oeuvre de la législation?” Revue Suisse de Sociologie, 7, 385–397.Google Scholar

Delpeuch, T., & Vassileva, M. (2009). “Contribution à une sociologie politique des entrepreneurs internationaux de transferts de réformes judiciaires.” L’Année Sociologique, 59(2), 371–402.Google Scholar

Delpeuch, T., Dumoulin, L., & De Galembert, C. (2014). Sociologie du droit et de la justice. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Demogue, R. (1911). Les notions fondamentales en droit privé (La Mémoire du Droit). Paris: Arthur Rousseau.Google Scholar

Demoulin, L., & Licoppe, C. (2011). “La visioconférence dans la justice pénale: retour sur la fabrique d’une politique publique.” Les Cahiers de La Justice, 2, 29–52.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1976). On Grammatology. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (2002). “Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundations of Authority’.” In Acts of Religion, edited by Derrida, Jacques & Anidjar, Gil (pp. 228–98). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Devon, C. & Roithmayr, D. (2014). “Critical Race Theory Meets Social Science.” Annual Revue of Law and Social Sciences, 10, 149–167.Google Scholar

Dezalay, Y. (1990). “Juristes purs et marchands de droit. Division du travail de domination symbolique et aggiornamento dans le champ du droit.” Politix, 3(10), 70–91.Google Scholar

Dezalay, Y. (1992). Marchands de droit. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

Dezalay, Y. (1993). “La production doctrinale comme objet et terrain de luttes politiques et professionnelles.” In La doctrine juridique, edited by Poirmeur, Yves & Bernard, Alain (pp. 230–239). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Dezalay, Y., & Garth, B. (2002). “Legitimating the New Legal Orthodoxy.” In Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy, edited by Dezalay, Yves & Garth, Bryan (pp. 306–334). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Dezalay, Y., Sarat, A., & Silbey, S. (1989). “D’une démarche contestataire a un savoir méritocratique. Eléments pour une histoire sociale de la sociologie juridique Américaine.” Actes de La Recherche En Sciences Sociales, 78, 79–90.Google Scholar

Dicey, A. V. (1905). Lectures on the Relation between the Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar

Di-Maggio, P., & Powell, W. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dingwall, R. (2003). “The LSA and the ‘Pax Americana’.” Law and Society Review, 37(2), 315–322.Google Scholar

Dingwall, R. (2007). “Sociology of Law.” In Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, edited by Ritzer, George & Ryan, Michael (pp. 2560–2564). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Dos Santos, W. G. (1987). Ciudadanía e justiça, a politica social na ordem Brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Campus.Google Scholar

Droit et Société. (2015). “Lettre – manifeste : ‘Le sens d’une revue académique’.” Droit et Société, 3(91), 459–462.Google Scholar

Dudas, J., Goldberg-Hiller, J., & McCann, M. (2015). “The Past, Present, and Future of Rights Scholarship.” In The Handbook of Law and Society, edited by Sarat, Austin & Ewick, Patricia (pp. 367–381). Malden: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Dufour, A. (1974). “Droit et langage dans l´Ecole historique du droit.” Archives de Philosophie Du Droit, 19, 115–180.Google Scholar

Duguit, L. (1889). “Le droit constitutionnel et la sociologie.” Revue Internationale de L’enseignement, 28, 484–505.Google Scholar

Duguit, L. (1922). Le droit social, le droit individuel et les transformations de l’Etat: conférences faîtes à l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes Sociales. Paris: F. Alcan.Google Scholar

Duguit, L., Fouillée, A., Demogue, R., & Charmont, J. (1916). Modern French Legal Philosophy. Boston: Boston Book Company.Google Scholar

Dulong, D. (1997). Moderniser la politique. Aux origines de la Ve République. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Dupré de Boulois, X., & Kaluszynski, M. (2011). Le droit en révolution. Regard sur la critique du droit des années 1970 à nos jours. Paris: LDGJ.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. (2006). Droit et sciences sociales. Paris: Armand Collin.Google Scholar

Dupret, B. (2010). “Droit et sciences sociales. Pour un respécification praxéologique.” Droit et Société, 75(2), 315–335.Google Scholar

Duran, P. (1993). “Piloter l’action publique avec ou sans le droit.” Politiques et Management Public, 11(4), 24.Google Scholar

Duran, P. (1999). Penser l’action publique. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. (1899). “Deux lois de l’évolution pénale.” L’Année Sociologique, 4, 65–95.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. (1963). Les règles de la méthode sociologique. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. (1993). La division du travail social. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Duxbury, N. (1995). Patterns of American Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. (1985). A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Edelman, L. (1992). “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organization Mediation of Civil Rights Law.” American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), 1531–1576.Google Scholar

Edelman, L. (2004). “Rivers of Law and Contested Terrains: A Law and Society Approach to Economic Rationality.” Law and Society Review, 38, 181–197.Google Scholar

Edelman, L. (2016). Working Law: Courts, Corporations, and Symbolic Civil Rights. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Edelman, L., & Stryker, R. (2005). “A Sociological Approach to Law and the Economy.” In The Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by Smelser, Neil & Swedberg, Richard (pp. 526–551). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Edelman, L., & Suchman, M. (1997). “The Legal Environment of Organizations.” Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 479–515.Google Scholar

Edelman, M. (1971). Politics as Symbolic Action: Mass Arousal and Quiescence. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar

Ehrlich, E. (1922). “The Sociology of Law.” Harvard Law Review, 36, 94–109.Google Scholar

Ehrlich, E. (1936). Principles of Sociology of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Elias, N. (1986). El proceso de la civilización. Investigaciones psicogenéticas y sociogenéticas. Mexico City: FCE.Google Scholar

Ellickson, R. (2000). “Trends in Legal Scholarship: A Statistical Study.” The Journal of Legal Studies, 29, 517–543.Google Scholar

Ellmann, S. (1995). “Struggle and Legitimation.” Law and Social Inquiry, 20(2), 340.Google Scholar

Emirbayer, M. (1997). “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–237.Google Scholar

Encinas de Muñagorri, R., Hannette-Vauchez, S., Herrera, C. M., & Leclerc, O. (2016). L’Analyse juridique de (x). Le droit parmi les sciences sociales. Paris: Kimé.Google Scholar

Engel, D. (1999). “Making Connections: Law and Society Researchers and Their Subjects.” Law and Society Review, 33(1), 3–16.Google Scholar

Engels, F. (1955). “The Housing Question.” In Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels Selected Works (Vol. 1, pp. 546–634). Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar

Epp, C. R. (1998). The Rights Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, L., & King, G. (2002). “Building an Infrastructure for Empirical Research.” Journal of Legal Education, 53, 311–320.Google Scholar

Erlanger, H. (2005). “Organizations, Institutions, and the Story of Shmuel: Reflections on the 40th Anniversary of the Law and Society Association.” Law and Society Review, 39(1), 1–10.Google Scholar

Erlanger, H., Garth, B., Larson, J., Mertz, E., Nourse, V., & Wilkins, D. (2005). “Foreword: Is It Time for a New Legal Realism?” Wisconsin Law Review, 2, 335–364.Google Scholar

Escalante, F. (2017) Historia mínima del neoliberalismo. México: Colegio de México.Google Scholar

Esquirol, J. (2008). “The Failed Law of Latin America.” The American Journal of Comparative Law, 56, 75–124.Google Scholar

Esquirol, J. (2011). “Renewing Latin American Legal Studies.” Institute for Global Law and Policy. Retrieved from www.harvardiglp.org/new-thinking-new-writing/interview-with-iglp-contributor-prof-jorge-esquirol.Google Scholar

Etienne, M. (1973). “The Ethics of Cause Lawyering: An Empirical Examination of Criminal Defense Lawyers as Cause Lawyers.” The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 95, 1195–1260.Google Scholar

Evan, W. (1980). “Law as an Instrument of Social Change.” In The Sociology of Law: A Social-Structural Perspective, edited by Evan, William (pp. 554–562). New York: W. Evan.Google Scholar

Ewald, F. (1986). L’etat providence. Paris. Grasset.Google Scholar

Ewick, P. (2006). “Consciousness as Ideology.” In The Blackwell Companion for the Sociology of Law, edited by Sarat, A. (pp. 80–94) Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Ewick, P. (2008). “Embracing Eclecticism.” Studies in Law, Politics and Society, 41, 1–18.Google Scholar

Ewick, P., & Sarat, A. (2015). “On the Emerging Maturity of Law and Society: An Introduction.” In The Handbook of Law and Society, edited by Sarat, Austin & Ewick, Patricia (pp. xiii–xx). Malden: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. (1992). “Conformity, Contestation and Resistance: An Account of Legal Consciousness.” New England Law Review, 26, 731–749.Google Scholar

Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. (1998). The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ewick, P., Kagan, R. A., & Sarat, A. (Eds.). (1999). Social Science, Social Policy, and the Law. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Faria, J. E. (1988). Eficácia jurídica e violência simbólica. O direito como instrumento de transformação social. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar

Felstiner, W. (2005). Reorganisation and Resistance: Legal Professions Confront a Changing World. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Felstiner, W., & Sarat, A. (1992). “Enactments of Power: Negotiating Reality and Responsibility in Lawyer-Client Interaction.” Cornell Law Review, 77, 1447–1498.Google Scholar

Felstiner, W., Abel, R., & Sarat, A. (1981). “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming.” Law and Society Review, 15, 631–654.Google Scholar

Fineman, M. (2015). “Feminist Legal Theory.” Journal of Gender, Social Policy and Law, 13(1), 13–32.Google Scholar

Fioravanti, M. (1999). Constituzione. Bologne: Il Mulino.Google Scholar

Fioravanti, M. (2001). Constitución: de la antigüedad a nuestros días. Madrid: Trotta.Google Scholar

Firestone, S. (1970). The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.Google Scholar

Fisher, W., Horwitz, M., & Reed, T. (1993). American Legal Realism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fiss, O. (1986). “The Death of the Law.” Cornell Law Review, 72, 1–16.Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, P. (1992). The Mythology of Modern Law: Sociology of Law and Crime. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fletcher, G. P. (1998). “Comparative Law as a Subversive Discipline.” American Journal of Comparative Law, 46, 683–700.Google Scholar

Flood, J. (1983). Barrister’s Clerks: The Law’s Middlemen. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et Punir. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1980a). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1980b). La verdad y las formas jurídicas. Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar

Fourcade, M. (2009). Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1870 to 1990. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

France, A. (1894). Le Lys rouge. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.Google Scholar

France, P., & Vachez, A. (2017). Sphère publique, Intérêts privés. Paris: Science Po.Google Scholar

François, B. (1996). Naissance d’une constitution. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar

Fraser, N. (1998). “Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation.” In The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, edited by Peterson, Grethe B. (Vol. 19, pp. 1–67). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

Fraser, N. (2000). De la redistribución al reconocimiento. Dilemas de la justicia en la era postsocialista. Madrid: The New Left.Google Scholar

Freeman, A. (1978). “Legitimizing Racial Discrimination through Antidiscrimination Law: A Critical Review of Supreme Court Doctrine.” Minnesota Law Review, 62, 1049.Google Scholar

Freeman, M. (2001). Introduction to Jurisprudence. London: Sweet and Maxwell Ltd.Google Scholar

Freeman, M. (2006). Law and Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Freidson, E. (1984). “The Changing Nature of Professional Control.” Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 1–20.Google Scholar

Friedman, L. (1985). A History of American Law. New York: Touchstone Book.Google Scholar

Friedman, L. (1989). “Sociology of Law and Legal History.” Sociologia Del Diritto, 16(2), 7–17.Google Scholar

Friedman, L. (2005). “Coming to Age: Law and Society Enters an Exclusive Club.” Annual Reviews of Law and Social Science, 1, 1–16.Google Scholar

Friedman, L., Pérez-Perdomo, R., & Gómez, M. (2012). Law in Many Societies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Friedrichs, D. (2006). Law in Our Lives. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Frug, M. J. (1992). “A Postmodern Feminist Legal Manifesto.” Harvard Law Review, 105, 1045.Google Scholar

Fuller, L. (1964). “The Morality of Law.” Harvard Law Review, 78, 1281.Google Scholar

Gabel, J. (1975). False Consciousness: An Essay on Reification. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Gabel, P. (1980). “Reification in Legal Reasoning.” Research in Law and Sociology, 3, 25–51.Google Scholar

Gabel, P. (1984). “Roll Over Beethoven.” Stanford Law Review, 36, 1–55.Google Scholar

Gabel, P., & Harris, P. (1983). “Building Power and Breaking Images: Critical Legal Theories and the Practice of Law.” New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 11, 369–412.Google Scholar

Gaillet, A. (2016). “Contre le formalism de la ‘jurisprudence de concepts’: Philipp Heck et la ‘jurisprudence des intérêts’ en Allemagne.” In Critique social et critique sociologique du droit en Europe et aux Etats-Unis, edited by Jouanjan, Olivier & Zoller, Élizabeth (pp. 195–222). Paris: Editions Panthéon-Assas.Google Scholar

Galanter, M. (1974). “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law and Society Review, 9, 1.Google Scholar

Galanter, M. (1985). “The Legal Malaise, Or Justice Observed.” Law and Society Review, 19, 537.Google Scholar

Galanter, M. (2005). Lowering the Bar: Lawyer Jokes and Legal Culture, Madison: Univeristy of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Galligan, D. (2007). Law in Modern Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ganne, Y. (2016). “La sociologie dans les doctrines contemporaines du droit aux Etats-Unis: entre héritage et renouveau.” In Critique social et critique sociologique du droit en Europe et aux Etats-Unis, edited by Jouanjan, Olivier & Zoller, Élizabeth (pp. 273–308). Paris: Editions Panthéon-Assas.Google Scholar

Garapon, A. (1995). “The French Legal Culture and the Shock of Globalization.” Social and Legal Studies, 4, 493–505.Google Scholar

Garapon, A. (1996). Les gardien de promesses. Justice et démocratie. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar

Garapon, A. (2007). “La place paradoxale de la culture juridique américaine dans la mondialisation.” In European Ways of Law: Towards a European Sociology of Law, edited by Nelken, David & Gessner, Volkmar (pp. 71–92). Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Garapon, A. (2010). La raison du moindre Etat. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar

Garapon, A., & Papadopoulos, I. (2003). Juger en Amérique et en France. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar

García-Villegas, M. (1993). La eficacia simbólica del derecho. Bogota: Uniandes.Google Scholar

García-Villegas, M. (1997). “Las fronteras del derecho.” Pensamiento Jurídico, 8, 25–50.Google Scholar

García-Villegas, M. (2001). Sociología Jurídica. Teoría y sociología del derecho en Estados Unidos. Bogota: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar

García-Villegas, M. (2002). “Law as Hope: Constitution and Social Change in Latin America.” Wisconsin International Law Journal, 20, 353–370.Google Scholar

García-Villegas, M. (2003a). “Symbolic Power without Symbolic Violence? Critical Legal Comments on Legal Consciousness Studies.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 16, 363–393.Google Scholar

García-Villegas, M. (2003b). “Symbolic Power without Symbolic Violence.” Florida Law Review, 55(1), 157–189.Google Scholar

García-Villegas, M. (2004). “On Bourdieu’s Legal Thought.” Droit et Société, 1, 57–70.Google Scholar

García-Villegas, M. (2006). “Comparative Sociology of Law: Legal Fields, Legal Scholarships, and Social Sciences in Europe ante The United States.” Law and Social Inquiry, 31(2), 343–382.Google Scholar

García-Villegas, M. (2009a). “Champs juridiques et sciences sociales en France et aux Etats-Unis.” L’Année Sociologique, 59(1), 29–62.Google Scholar

García-Villegas, M. (2010). Sociología y crítica del derecho. México City: Fontamara.Google Scholar

García-Villegas, M. (2012a). “Constitucionalismo aspiracional: Derecho, democracia y cambio social en América Latina.” Análisis Político, 25(75), 89–110.Google Scholar

García-Villegas, M. (2012b). “La sociologie du droit de Jean Carbonier.” In Les Actes Jean Carbonier (pp. 1112–1118). Paris: Le Senat.Google Scholar

García-Villegas, M. (2014). La eficacia simbólica del derecho. Sociología política del campo jurídico en América Latina. Bogota: Random House.Google Scholar

García-Villegas, M. (2015). Les pouvoirs du droit. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

García-Villegas, M. (2016). “A Comparison of Sociopolitical Legal Studies.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 12, 25–44.Google Scholar

García-Villegas, M., & Ceballos, M.-A. (2016). Democracia, justicia y sociedad. Diez años de investigación en Dejusticia. Bogotá: Dejusticia.Google Scholar

García-Villegas, M., & Lejeune, A. (2011). “La sociologie du droit en France: de deux sociologies à la création d’un projet pluridisciplinaires.” Revue Interdisciplinaire D’études Juridiques, 66, 1–139.Google Scholar

García-Villegas, M., & Saffón, M. P. (2011). Crítica jurídica comparada. Bogota: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar

García-Villegas, M., & Uprimny, R. (2006). El control judicial de los estados de excepción en Colombia. Bogota: Norma.Google Scholar

García-Villegas, M., Jaramillo, I. C., & Restrepo, E. (2007). “Estudio preliminar.” In Crítica jurídica. Teoría y sociología jurídica en los Estados Unidos, edited by García-Villegas, Mauricio, Jaramillo, Isabel Cristina, & Restrepo, Esteban (pp. 7–65). Bogota: Universidad Nacional and Universidad de los Andes.Google Scholar

Gardner, J. (1980). Legal Imperialism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Gargarella, R. (2005). El derecho a la protesta. Buenos Aires: Ad-Hoc.Google Scholar

Gargarella, R. (2011a). 200 años de constitucionalismo en América Latina. 1810–2010. Buenos Aires: Ad-Hoc.Google Scholar

Gargarella, R. (2011b). “Pensando sobre la reforma constitucional en América Latina.” In El derecho en América Latina; un mapa para el pensamiento jurídico del siglo XXI, edited by Garavito, César Rodíguez (pp. 87–108). Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar

Gargarella, R. (2014). “Latin American Constitutionalism: Social Rights and the ‘Engine Room’ of the Constitution.” In Law and Society in Latin America, edited by Garavito, César Rodríguez (pp. 83–92). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Garland, D. (1990). Punishment and Modern Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Garland, D., & Sparks, R. (2000). Criminology and Social Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Garth, B., & Dezalay, Y. (1996). Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Garth, B., & Sterling, J. (1998). “From Legal Realism to Law and Society: Reshaping Law for the Last Stages of the Social Activist State.” Law and Society Review, 22(2), 409–471.Google Scholar

Garzón, I., & Botero, A. (2012). “El debate público sobre cuestiones éticas y religiosas en Colombia: algunas lecciones habermasianas.” In Tolerancia y derecho; un análisis de los derechos LGBTI, edited by Botero, Andrés (pp. 171–199). Medellín: Universidad de Medellín.Google Scholar

Gazzaniga, J. L. (1994). “Quand les avocats forment les juristes et la doctrine.” Droits, 20, 31–41.Google Scholar

Geertz, C. (1983). Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Geiger, T. (1969). On Social Order and Mass Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gény, F. (1899). Méthode d’interprétation et sources en droit privé positif. Paris: A. Chevalier-Marescq.Google Scholar

Gessner, V., & Budak, A. C. (1998). Emerging Legal Certainty: Empirical Studies on the Globalization of Law. Dartmouth: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Gessner, V., & Nelken, D. (2007a). European Ways of Law: Towards a European Sociology of Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Gessner, V., & Nelken, D. (2007b). “Introduction: Studying European Ways of Law.” In European Ways of Law: Towards a European Sociology of Law, edited by Nelken, David & Gessner, Volkmar (pp. 1–17). Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1984). The Construction of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gilligan, C. (1993). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gjerdingen, D. (1983). “The Coase Theorem and the Psychology of Common-Law Thought.” Southern California Law Review, 56, 711.Google Scholar

Golder, B., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2009). Foucault’s Law. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gómez de la Serna, R. (2014). “Peor que el infierno.” In Antología de la literatura fantástica, edited by Borges, Jorge Luis, Casares, Adolfo Bioy, & Ocampo, Silvina (pp. 189–190). Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.Google Scholar

Gómez, L. (2004). “A Tale of Two Genres: On the Real and Ideal Links between Law and Society and Critical Race Theory.” In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, edited by Sarat, Austin (pp. 435–452). Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Gómez, L. (2012). “Looking for Race in All the Wrong Places.” Law and Society Review, 46(2), 221–245.Google Scholar

Gordon, R. (1984). “Critical Legal Histories.” Stanford Law Review, 57, 36.Google Scholar

Gordon, R. (1988). “The Independence of Lawyers.” Boston University Law Review, 68, 83.Google Scholar

Gordon, R. (1998). “Some Critical Theories on Law and Their Critics.” In The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, edited by Kairys, David (3rd ed., pp. 641–662). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gordon, R. W. (1987). “Unfreezing Legal Reality: Critical Approaches to Law.” Florida State University Law Review, 15, 195.Google Scholar

Gordon, R. W., & Horwitz, M. (Eds.). (2014). Law, Society and History: Themes in the Legal Sociology and Legal History of Lawrence Friedman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Grattet, R., & Jenness, V. (2008). “Transforming Symbolic Law into Organizational Action: Hate Crime Policy and Law Enforcement Practice.” Social Forces, 87, 501.Google Scholar

Greenhouse, C. (2015). “Durkheim in the United States: 1900.” In Critique social et critique sociologique du droit en Europe et aux Etats-Unis, edited by Jouanjan, Olivier & Zoller, Élizabeth (pp. 35–54). Paris: Editions Panthéon-Assas.Google Scholar

Griffiths, J. (2006). “The Idea of Sociology of Law and Its Relation to Law and Sociology.” In Law and Sociology: Current Legal Issues, edited by Freeman, Michael (Vol. 8, pp. 49–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Grossman, J., Kritzer, H., & Macaulay, S. (2014). “Do the ‘Haves’ Still Come Out Ahead?” In The Law and Society Reader II, edited by Larson, Erik & Schmidt, Patrick (pp. 13–15). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Guibentif, P. (2002). “The Sociology of Law as a Sub-Discipline of Sociology.” Portuguese Journal of Social Sciences, 1(3), 175–184.Google Scholar

Guibentif, P. (2010). Foucault, Luhmann, Habermas, Bourdieu; une génération repense le droit. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Gupta, A. (1995). “Blurred Boundaries: The Discourse of Corruption, the Culture of Politics, and the Imagined State.” American Ethnologist, 22(2), 375–402.Google Scholar

Gurr, T. (1970). Why Men Rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gurvitch, G. (1931). L’idée du droit social; Notion et système du droit social: Histoire doctrinale depuis le XVIIIe siècle jusqu’à la fin du XIXe siècle. Paris: Sirey.Google Scholar

Gurvitch, G. (1935). L’Expérience juridique et la philosophie pluraliste du droit. Paris: A. Pedone.Google Scholar

Gurvitch, G. (1940). Éléments de sociologie juridique. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar

Gurvitch, G. (1942). Sociology of Law. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar

Gusfield, J. (1963). Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1998). Facticidad y validez. Sobre el derecho y el Estado democrático de derecho en términos de teoría del discurso. Madrid: Trotta.Google Scholar

Hall, S. (1996). “The Problem of Ideology: Marxism without Guarantees.” In Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies, edited by Morley, David & Chen, Kuan-Hsing (pp. 24–45). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Halley, J. E. (1993). “Reasoning about Sodomy: Act and Identity in and after Bowers v. Hardwick.” Virginia Law Review, 79, 1721.Google Scholar

Halpérin, J. L. (Ed.). (2011a). Paris, capital juridique (1804–1950). Etude de socio-histoire sur la faculté de droit de Paris. Paris: Editions Rue d’Ulm.Google Scholar

Halpérin, J. L. (2011b). Un gouvernement de professeurs: réalité ou illusion? Paris: Edition Rue d’Ulm.Google Scholar

Halpérin, J. L. (2015). L´indépendance de l´avocat en France au XIXe et XXe siècle. In L’indépendence des avocats: le long chemin d’une liberté, edited by Assier-Andrieu, Louis. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar

Handler, J. (1992). “Postmodernism, Protest and the New Social Movements.” Law and Society Review, 26, 697–732.Google Scholar

Handler, J., & Hasenfeld, Y. (2007). Blame Welfare, Ignore Poverty and Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haney López, I. F. (1994). “The Social Construction of Race: Some Observations on Illusion, Fabrication, and Choice.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 29, 1.Google Scholar

Harari, Y. N. (2015). Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Harris, A. (1990). “Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory.” Stanford Law Review, 42(3), 481–616.Google Scholar

Harris, C. I. (1993). “Whiteness as Property.” Harvard Law Review, 106, 1709–1791.Google Scholar

Harrison, J. (2003). Law and Economics. St. Paul: Thomson West.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. (1970). “Jhering’s Heaven of Concepts and Modern Analytical Jurisprudence.” In Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. (1983). “American Jurisprudence through English Eyes: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream.” In Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy, edited by Hart, H. L. A. (pp. 123–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hauriou, M. (1910). Principes du droit publique. Paris: Larose et Ténin.Google Scholar

Hawkins, K. (2003). Law as Last Resort. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Heinz, J. P., & Laumann, E. O. (1982). Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Heinz, J., Laumann, E., Nelson, R., & Michelson, E. (2014). “The Changing Character of Lawyers’ Work: Chicago in 1975 and 1995.” In The Law and Society Reader II, edited by Larson, Erik & Schmidt, Patrick (pp. 141–146). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Heise, M. (2002). “The Past, Present, and Future of Empirical and Experimental Legal Scholarship: Judicial Decisionmaking as a Case Study.” University of Illinois Law Review, 4, 819–850.Google Scholar

Held, D., & Roger, C. (2013). Global Governance at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Herget, J., & Wallace, S. (1987). “The German Free Law Movement at the Source of American Legal Realism.” Virginia Law Review, 73(2), 399–455.Google Scholar

Herrera, C. M. (2002). Les juristes de gauche sous la république de Weimar. Paris: Kimé.Google Scholar

Herrera, C. M. (2003a). Par le droit, au-delà du droit. Textes sur le socialisme juridique. Paris: Kemé.Google Scholar

Herrera, C. M. (2003b). Droit et Gauche; pour une identification. Quebec: Les Press de l’Université de Laval.Google Scholar

Herrera, C. M. (2003c). Les juristes face au politique. Le droit, la gauche, la doctrine sous la III République. Paris: Editions Kimé.Google Scholar

Herrera, C. M. (2016). “Droits sociaux et politiques chez Gurvitch.” Droit et Société, 94, 513–524.Google Scholar

Herrera, C. M., & Le Pillouer, A. (Eds.). (2012). Comment écrit-on l’histoire constitutionnelle? Paris: Kimé.Google Scholar

Hespanha, A. M. (2005). Cultura Jurídica Europeia. Síntese de um Milênio. Florianópolis: Boiteux.Google Scholar

Hespanha, A. M. (2011). “Taking the History Seriously: The Exégetas as Themselves Tell It.” Presented at the V Congreso Brasilero de Historia del derecho, Curitiba, Brasil.Google Scholar

Hesselink, M. (2001). The New European Legal Culture. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Heurtin, J., & Molfessis, N. (2006). La sociologie du Droit de Max Weber. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar

Hirschl, R. (2004). Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Holger, S. (2015). “Empirical Comparative Law.” Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences, 11, 131–153.Google Scholar

Holmes, O. W. (1881). The Common Law. Boston: Little Brown and Company.Google Scholar

Holmes, O. W. (1897). “The Path of the Law.” Harvard Law Review, 10, 457.Google Scholar

Holmes, O. W. (1920). “The Path of the Law.” In Collected Legal Papers, edited by Holmes, O. W. (pp. 167–202). New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar

Holston, J. (2008). Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Honneth, A., & Joas, H. (1988) Social Action and Human Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Horowitz, I. (1993). The Decomposition of Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Horwitz, M. J. (1992). The Transformation of American Law: 1870–1960. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hoyos, I. M. (2005). “Entre el delito del aborto y el derecho a abortar.” In La Constitucionalización de Las Falacias. Antecedentes a una sentencia, edited by Myriam Hoyos, Ilva (pp. 4–114). Bogota: Temis.Google Scholar

Hunt, A. (1978). The Sociological Movement in Law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Hunt, A. (1982). “Emile Durkheim: Towards a Sociology of Law.” In Marxism and Law, edited by Beirne, Piers and Quinney, Richard (pp. 27–43). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Hunt, A. (1985). “The Ideology of Law: Advances and Problems in Recent Applications of the Concept of Ideology to the Analysis of Law.” Law and Society Review, 11, 19.Google Scholar

Hunt, A. (1990). “The Big Fear: Law Confronts Postmodernism.” McGill Law Journal, 35(3), 507–540.Google Scholar

Hunt, A. (1993). Explorations in Law and Society: Toward a Constitutive Theory of Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hunt, A. (1994). Foucault and Law: Toward a Sociology of Law and Governance. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar

Hunt, E., & Colander, D. (2013). Social Science: An Introduction to the Study of Society. New York: Pearson Higher.Google Scholar

Hurst, J. W. (1956). Law and the Conditions of Freedom in the Nineteenth-Century United States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, A. (1992). “Doing the Right Thing? Toward a Postmodern Politics.” Law and Society Review, 26, 773–787.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, A. (1989). Critical Legal Studies. Totowa: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, D. (2003). “Centennial Tribute Essay: Elements of the Law.” University of Chicago Law Review, 70, 141.Google Scholar

Hutter, B. (1988). The Reasonable Arm of the Law? Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Iglesias, E., & Valdés, F. (2001). “LatCrit at Five: Institutionalizing a Postsubordination Future.” Denver University Law Review, 78, 1249.Google Scholar

Israël, L. (2001). “Usages militants du droit dans l’arène judiciaire : le cause lawyering.” Droit et Société, 3(49), 793–824.Google Scholar

Israël, L. (2005). Robes noires, années sombres. Avocats et magistrats en résistance pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

Israël, L. (2008a). “Question(s) de méthodes. Se saisir du droit en sociologie.” Droit et Société, 69–70, 381–395.Google Scholar

Israel, L. (2008b). “Présentation; dossier: Quelles méthodes pour la sociologie du droit et de la justice.” Droit et Société, 2(69–70), 325–329.Google Scholar

Israël, L. (2009a). L´Arme du droit. Paris: Presses de SciencesPo.Google Scholar

Israël, L. (2009b). “Résister par le droit? Avocats et magistrats dans la Résistance (1941–1944).” L’Année Sociologique, 59(1), 149–176.Google Scholar

Israël, L. (2012a). “Conseil de sociologues. Bruno Latour et Dominique Sshnapper face au droit.” Genèses, 87(2), 136–152.Google Scholar

Israël, L. (2012b). “Le rôle du droit dans la formation des élites.” Clio@themis. Revue Electronique D’histoire Du Droit, 5, 1–9.Google Scholar

Israël, L. (2013). “Legalise It! The Rising Place of Law in French Sociology.” International Journal of Law in Context, 9(2), 262–278.Google Scholar

Israël, L., & Mouralis, G. (2005). “Les magistrats, le droit positif et la morale. Usages sociaux du positivisme et du naturalisme juridique en France sous Vichy en Allemagne depuis 1945.” In Sur la portée sociale du droit, edited by Israël, Liora, Sacriste, Guillaume, Vauchez, Antoine, & Willemez, Laurent (pp. 61–78). Paris: PUF–CURAPP.Google Scholar

Israël, L., & Pelisse, J. (2004). “Quelques éléments sur les conditions d’une importation (Note liminaire à la traduction du texte de S. Silbey et P. Ewick).” Terrains & Travaux, 1(6), 101–111.Google Scholar

Israël, L., & Vanneuville, R. (2014). “Enquêter sur la formation au droit en France : l’exemple des formations extra-universitaires.” Revue Interdisciplinaire D’Etudes Juridiques, 72, 141–162.Google Scholar

Israel, L., & Vanneuville, R. (2017). “Legal Training and the Reshaping of French Elite: Lessons from an Ethnography of Law Classes in Two French Elite Higher Education Institutions.” Journal of Education and Work, 30(2), 156–167.Google Scholar

Israël, L., Sacriste, G., Vauchez, A., & Willemez, L. (2005a). “Introduction.” In Les usages sociaux du droit, edited by Lochak, Danièle (pp. 10–18). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Israël, L., Sacriste, G., Vauchez, A., & Willemez, L. (Eds.). (2005b). Sur la portée sociale du droit. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Jaggar, A. (1983). Feminist Politics and Human Nature. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Jamin, C. (2012). La cuisine du droit. Paris: Lextenso Éditions.Google Scholar

Jaramillo, I. C. (2010). “The Social Approach to Family Law: Some Conclusions from the Canonical Family Law Treatises of Latin America.” American Journal of Comparative Law, 58(4), 843.Google Scholar

Jaramillo, I. C., & Alfonso, T. (2008). Mujeres, cortes y medios: la reforma judicial del aborto. Bogota: Siglo del Hombre – Uniandes.Google Scholar

Jaurès, J. (1964). “Discours à la jeunesse.” In L’esprit du socialisme: Six discours et études, edited by Jaurès, Jean (pp. 55–67). Paris: Gonthier.Google Scholar

Jeammaud, A. (1987). La crítica jurídica en Francia. Puebla: Universidad Autónoma de Puebla.Google Scholar

Jellinek, G. (1981). Teoría General del Estado. Buenos Aires: Albatros.Google Scholar

Jenness, V., & Smyth, M. (2011). “The Passage and Implementation of the Prison Rape Elimination Act: Legal Endogeneity and the Uncertain Road from Symbolic Law to Instrumental Effects.” Stanford Law and Policy Review, 22, 489–527.Google Scholar