Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:41:19.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Linking the unlinkable? International norms and nationalism in Indonesia and the Philippines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2009

Thomas Risse
Affiliation:
European University Institute, Florence
Stephen C. Ropp
Affiliation:
University of Wyoming
Kathryn Sikkink
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The sudden change of power in Indonesia in May 1998 makes us forget that for a very long period of time it appeared as if Southeast Asian countries were “hard cases” in terms of a positive development with regard to civil and political human rights. Except in the cases of Thailand and the Philippines, democratic freedoms were and still are being severely curtailed in the entire Southeast Asian region (Hassan 1996; Mauzy 1995). The debate over the universality of international human rights standards and Asian values has influential supporters in many Southeast Asian countries such as Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia (see Emmerson 1996; Heinz and Pfennig 1996; Kausikan 1994). Moreover, lacking a regional mechanism for the promotion and protection of human rights, such as the European or African Human Rights Conventions, Asian countries never experienced the socialization effects that might be expected from such a regional human rights organization (see Jones 1996).

In this context, the purpose of this chapter is twofold. First, it will evaluate the spiral model presented in the editor's introduction by comparing state-society relations in the Philippines and in Indonesia from the early 1970s to the mid-1990s. I will argue that the spiral model can be applied to the Philippines as well as to Indonesia and that in both countries, transnational human rights networks induced changes in human rights practices. The effect of these networks was more substantial in the Philippines, where according to the indicators – torture, extrajudicial killings, arbitrary arrest, and disappearances – it has led to a steady decrease in human rights violations (beginning the fifth phase of the model).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Power of Human Rights
International Norms and Domestic Change
, pp. 134 - 171
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×