Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:18:37.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2023

Edited by
Nathan Gilbert ,
Margaret Graver  and
Sean McConnell
Nathan Gilbert
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Margaret Graver
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College, New Hampshire
Sean McConnell
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Power and Persuasion in Cicero's Philosophy , pp. 241 - 258
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesse, F. (1997) Panezio di Rodi. Naples.Google Scholar
Alexander, M. (1990) Trials in the Late Roman Republic. Toronto.Google Scholar
Algra, K. (2003) Vitae philosophia dux. Zum Verhältnis von Philosophie und Politik bei Cicero. In van den Brink, B., Düwell, M., van Doorn, H. and Essbach, W. (eds.), Geschichte – Politik – Philosophie. Festschrift für Willem van Reijen zum 65. Geburtstag, Munich, 11–23.Google Scholar
Altman, W. H. F. (2009) Womanly humanism in Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations. Transactions of the American Philological Association 139: 411–45.Google Scholar
Altman, W. H. F. (2016) The Revival of Platonism in Cicero’s Late Philosophy: Platonis aemulus and the Invention of Cicero. London.Google Scholar
Ando, C. (2010a) ‘A dwelling beyond violence’: On the uses and disadvantages of history for contemporary republicans. History of Political Thought 31: 183–220.Google Scholar
Ando, C. (2010b) Empire and the laws of war: An archaeology. In Kingsbury, B. and Straumann, B. (eds.), The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire, Oxford, 30–52.Google Scholar
Appiah, A. (2006) Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York.Google Scholar
Arena, V. (2012) Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Later Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. (2011) Epicurean virtues, Epicurean friendship: Cicero vs. the Herculaneum papyri. In Fish, J. and Sanders, K. (eds.), Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition, Cambridge, 105–28.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (2004) The state as a partnership: Cicero’s definition of res publica in his work On the State. History of Political Thought 25: 569–98.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (2005) A new kind of model: Cicero’s Roman constitution in De republica. American Journal of Philology 126: 377–416.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (2014) Cicero mythologus: The myth of the founders in De republica. Classical Journal 110: 23–42.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (2017) The Stoics on the craft of poetry. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 160: 113–51.Google Scholar
Astin, A. E. (1978) Cato the Censor. Oxford.Google Scholar
Atherton, C. (1988) Hand over fist: The failure of Stoic rhetoric. Classical Quarterly 38: 392–427.Google Scholar
Atkins, E. M. (1990) ‘Domina et regina virtutum’: Justice and societas in De officiis. Phronesis 35: 258–89.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2013) Cicero on Politics and the Limits of Reason: The Republic and Laws. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2018) Roman Political Thought. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2019) Conscience and integrity in medical ethics: A Ciceronian perspective. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 62: 470–88.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2022) Empire, just wars, and cosmopolitanism. In Atkins, J. W. and Bénatouïl, T. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero’s Philosophy, Cambridge, 231–51.Google Scholar
Aubert, S. (2008) Cicéron et la parole stoïcienne: polémique autour de la dialectique. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 57: 61–91.Google Scholar
Aubert-Baillot, S. (2019) Terminology and practice of dialectic in Cicero’s Letters. In Bénatouïl, T. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.), Dialectic after Plato and Aristotle, Cambridge, 254–82.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1970) A plea for excuses. In Austin, J. L. (ed.), Philosophical Papers, 2nd ed., Oxford, 175–204.Google Scholar
Auvray-Assayas, C. (2001) Réécrire Platon? Les enjeux du dialogue chez Cicéron. In Cossutta, F. and Narcy, M. (eds.), La Forme dialogue chez Platon: Évolution et réceptions, Grenoble, 237–55.Google Scholar
Auvray-Assayas, C. (2015) Le dialogue cicéronien ou le livre éloquent. In Dubel, S. and Gotteland, S. (eds.), Formes et genres du dialogue antique, Paris, 127–36.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1956) Q. Mucius Scaevola and the province of Asia. Athenaeum 34: 104–23.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1969) Cicero and the commission of 146. In Bibauw, J. (ed.), Hommages à Marcel Renard, Brussels, 54–66.Google Scholar
Balsdon, J. P. V. D. (1960) Auctoritas, dignitas, otium. Classical Quarterly 10: 43–50.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H. (2011) Cicero’s translation of Greek philosophy: Personal mission or public service? In McElduff, S. and Sciarrino, E. (eds.), Complicating the History of Western Translation: The Ancient Mediterranean in Perspective, Manchester, 37–47.Google Scholar
Baraz, Y. (2012) A Written Republic: Cicero’s Philosophical Politics. Princeton.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1997) Logic in Academica I and the Lucullus. In Inwood, B. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books, Leiden, 140–60.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2015) Cicero and the just war. In Barnes, J. (ed.), Mantissa: Essays in Ancient Philosophy IV, Oxford, 56–79.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds.) (1997) Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barton, C. (2001) Roman Honor: The Fire in the Bones. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. and Bonazzi, M. (2012) θεωρία and βίος θεωρητικός from the Presocratics to the end of antiquity: An overview. In Bénatouïl, T. and Bonazzi, M. (eds.), Theoria, Praxis, and the Contemplative Life after Plato and Aristotle, Leiden, 17–40.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. (2007) Le débat entre platonisme et stoïcisme sur la vie scolastique: Chrysippe, la Nouvelle Académie et Antiochus. In Bonazzi, M. and Helmig, C. (eds.), Platonic Stoicism, Stoic Platonism: The Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity, Leuven, 1–21.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. (2012) Théophraste: Les limites éthiques, psychologiques et cosmologiques de la contemplation. In Bénatouïl, T. and Bonazzi, M. (eds.), Theoria, Praxis, and the Contemplative Life after Plato and Aristotle, Leiden, 17–40.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. (2019) Entre sophistique, scepticisme et platonisme: Le discours de Philus et de Carnéade sur la justice dans le De re publica de Cicéron. In Machuca, D. and Marchand, S. (eds.), Les raisons du doute: Études sur le scepticisme antique, Paris, 181–212.Google Scholar
Benferhat, Y. (2005) Ciues Epicurei: Les Épicuriens et l'idée de monarchie à Rome et en Italie de Sylla à Octave. Brussels.Google Scholar
Blösel, W. (2000) Die Geschichte des Begriffes mos maiorum von den Anfängen bis zu Cicero. In Linke, B. and Stemmler, M. (eds.), Mos maiorum: Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der römischen Republik, Stuttgart, 25–97.Google Scholar
Blößner, N. (2001) Cicero gegen die Philosophie: Eine Analyse von De republica 1–3. Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen aus dem Jahre 2001, phil.‐ hist. Klasse, 197–271.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. (1936) Les méthodes de l’histoire littéraire: Cicéron et son œuvre philosophique. Revue des Études Latines 14: 288–309.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. (1948) Cum dignitate otium. Revue des Études Anciennes 43: 172–91.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. (1970) Études sur l’humanisme Cicéronien. Brussels.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. (2012) The nature of the spirited part of the soul and its object. In Barney, R., Brennan, T., and Brittain, C. (eds.), Plato and the Divided Self, Cambridge, 102–27.Google Scholar
Brinton, A. (1988) Cicero’s use of historical examples in moral argument. Philosophy and Rhetoric 21: 169–84.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2001) Philo of Larissa: The Last of the Academic Sceptics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2005) Common sense: Concepts, definition and meaning in and out of the Stoa. In Frede, D. and Inwood, B. (eds.), Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age, Cambridge, 164–209.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2006) Cicero. On Academic Scepticism. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2016) Cicero’s sceptical methods: The example of the De Finibus. In Annas, J. and Betegh, G. (eds.), Cicero’s De Finibus: Philosophical Approaches, Cambridge, 12–40.Google Scholar
Bronowski, A. (2019) The Stoics on Lekta: All There Is to Say. Oxford.Google Scholar
Broughton, T. and Patterson, M. L. (1951) Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. 1. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2017) ‘Richer than the Greeks’: Cicero’s constitutional thought. In Höffe, O. (ed.), Ciceros Staatsphilosophie: Ein kooperativer Kommentar zu De re publica und De legibus, Berlin, 33–46.Google Scholar
Brunstetter, D. R. and O’Driscoll, C. (eds.) (2017) Just War Thinkers: From Cicero to the 21st Century. Abingdon.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. (1988) The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. (2013) Studies in Stoicism, edited by Griffin, M. and Samuels, A., with the assistance of Crawford, M.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Büchner, K. (1962) Die beste Verfassung. In Büchner, K. (ed.), Cicero: Studien zur römischen Literatur, vol. 2, Stuttgart, 25–115.Google Scholar
Büchner, K. (1984) M. Tullius Cicero: De Re Publica. Kommentar. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Burchell, D. (1998) Civic personae: MacIntyre, Cicero and moral personality. History of Political Thought 19: 101–18.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1976) Protagoras and self-refutation in later Greek philosophy. Philosophical Review 85: 44–69.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1997) Antipater and self-refutation: Elusive arguments in Cicero’s Academica. In Inwood, B. and Mansfield, J. (eds.), Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books, Leiden, 277–310.Google Scholar
Burton, P. J. (2011) Friendship and Empire: Roman Diplomacy and Imperialism in the Middle Republic (353–146 B.C.). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. (1993) AIDŌS: The Psychology and Ethics of Honor and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cancelli, F. (1972) ‘Iuris consensu’ nella definizione ciceroniana di ‘res publica’. Rivista di Cultura Classica e Medioevale 14: 247–67.Google Scholar
Capello, O. (2019) The School of Doubt: Skepticism, History and Politics in Cicero’s Academica. Leiden.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2019) Dialectic in the Hellenistic Academy. In Bénatouïl, T. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.), Dialectic after Plato and Aristotle, Cambridge, 168–217.Google Scholar
Castner, C. (1988) A Prosopography of Roman Epicureans. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. L. (1951) The thesis in the Roman rhetorical schools of the Republic. Classical Quarterly 1: 159–66.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. L. (1956) The Roman Mind: Studies in the History of Thought from Cicero to Marcus Aurelius. London.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. L. (1961) Review of A. Michel, Rhétorique et philosophie chez Cicéron. Journal of Roman Studies 51: 268–9.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1988) Reading the Republic. In Griswold, C. (ed.), Platonic Writings/Platonic Readings, University Park, 19–34.Google Scholar
Cokayne, K. (2003) Experiencing Old Age in Ancient Rome. London and New York.Google Scholar
Cole, S. (2013) Cicero and the Rise of Deification at Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Colish, M. L. (1985) The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages. Leiden.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2007) The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (2002) Rhetorical education in Cicero’s youth. In May, J. M. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, Leiden, 23–48.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (2001) Cicero on the origins of Rome. In Powell, J. G. F. and North, J. A. (eds.), Cicero’s Republic, London, 41–56.Google Scholar
Dafoe, A., Renshon, J., and Huth, P. (2014) Reputation and status as motives for war. Annual Review of Political Science 17: 371–93.Google Scholar
Dalfen, J. (2000) Cicero’s «cum dignitate otium». In Sigot, E. (ed.), Otium—Negotium: Beiträge des Interdisziplinären Symposions der Sodalitas zum Thema Zeit, Vienna, 169–87.Google Scholar
De Jonge, C. (2012) Review of N. Marini (ed.), Demetrio, Lo Stile. Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2009.08.12 http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2009/2009-08-12.htmlGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, T. (1940) Plato in Cicero. Classical Philology 35: 143–53.Google Scholar
DiLorenzo, R. (1978) The critique of Socrates in Cicero’s De oratore: ornatus and the nature of wisdom. Philosophy and Rhetoric 11: 247–61.Google Scholar
Dobesch, G. (1985) Politische Bermerkungen zu Ciceros Rede Pro Marcello. In Weber, E. and Dobesch, G. (eds.), Römische Geschichte, Altertumskunde und Epigraphik: Festschrift für Artur Betz zur Vollendung seines 80. Lebensjahres, Vienna, 153–231.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. (1959) Plato: Gorgias. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1996) Gaio Bambino. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 111: 41–3.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1985) Cicero: Tusculan Disputations I. Edited with Translation and Notes. Warminster.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1990) Cicero: Tusculan Disputations II & V, with a Summary of III and IV. Edited with an Introduction, Translation and Commentary. Warminster.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1995) Form and content in the Tusculan Disputations. In Powell, J. G. F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers, Oxford, 197–218.Google Scholar
Drexler, H. (1958) Res publica (II parte). Maia 10: 3–37.Google Scholar
Drexler, H. (1988) Politische Grundbegriffe der Römer. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Drogula, F. K. (2007) Imperium, potestas, and the pomerium in the Roman Republic. Historia 56: 419–52.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2013a) Cicero’s rhetorical theory. In Steel, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero, Cambridge, 25–40.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2013b) Cicero and the politics of ambiguity: Interpreting the Pro Marcello. In Steel, C. and van der Bloom, H. (eds.), Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, Oxford, 211–25.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. (1996) A Commentary on Cicero, De officiis. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Dyer, R. R. (1990) Rhetoric and intention in Cicero’s Pro Marcello. Journal of Roman Studies 80: 17–30.Google Scholar
Edelstein, L. and Kidd, I. (1988–9) Posidonius, 3 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Einarson, B. and DeLacy, P. (trans.) (1959) Plutarch’s Moralia, vol. 7. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Englert, W. (1990) Bringing philosophy to the light: Cicero’s Paradoxa Stoicorum. Apeiron 23: 117–42.Google Scholar
Erskine, A. (1997) Cicero and the expression of grief. In Braund, S. M. and Gill, C. (eds.), The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature, Cambridge, 36–47.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2003) Three wise men and the end of the Roman Republic. In Cairns, F. and Fantham, E. (eds.), Caesar against Liberty? Perspectives on His Autocracy, Cambridge, 96–117.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2004) The Roman World of Cicero’s De oratore. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (1977) Le discours de Philus (Cicéron, De Re Publica III, 8–31) et la philosophie de Carnéade. Revue des Études Latines 55: 128–56.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (1984) L’Archéologie du De re publica (2, 2, 4–37, 63): Cicéron entre Polybe et Platon. Journal of Roman Studies 74: 87–98.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (1995) The statesman and the law in the political philosophy of Cicero. In Laks, A. and Schofield, M. (eds.), Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy, Cambridge, 48–73.Google Scholar
Fotheringham, L. (2007) Having your cake and eating it: How Cicero combines arguments. In Powell, J. G. F. (ed.), Logos: Rational Argument in Classical Rhetoric, London, 69–90.Google Scholar
Fott, D. (2014) Marcus Tullius Cicero: On the Republic and On the Laws. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Fox, M. (2007) Cicero’s Philosophy of History. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, M. (1960) Cum dignitate otium. Politisches Programm und Staatstheorie bei Cicero. Gymnasium 67: 481–500.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, L. (2013) Cicero’s palinode: Inconsistency in the Late Republic. Greece and Rome 60: 246–61.Google Scholar
Gagliardi, P. (1997) Il dissenso e l'ironia: per una rilettura delle orazioni ‘cesariane’ di Cicerone. Naples.Google Scholar
Gaines, R. N. (2002) Cicero’s Partitiones Oratoriae and Topica: Rhetorical philosophy and philosophical rhetoric. In May, J. M. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, Leiden, 445–80.Google Scholar
Garbarino, G. (2003) Philosophorum Romanorum fragmenta usque ad L. Annaei Senecae. Aetatem. Bologna.Google Scholar
Garbarino, I. (ed.) (1984) M. Tulli Ciceronis fragmenta ex libris philosophicis, ex aliis libris deperditis, ex scriptis incertis. Turin.Google Scholar
Gee, E. (2001) Cicero’s astronomy. Classical Quarterly 51: 520–36.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N. (2015) Among friends: Cicero and the Epicureans. PhD Diss. Toronto.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2007) Paideia Romana: Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2011) Creative Eloquence: The Construction of Reality in Cicero's Speeches. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2013a) Of Cicero’s Plato: Fictions, forms, foundations. In Schofield, M. (ed.), Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century bc, Cambridge, 225–75.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2013b) Cicero’s dialogues: Historiography manqué and the evidence of fiction. In Föllinger, S. and Müller, G. (eds.), Der Dialog in der Antike: Formen und Funktionen einer literarischen Gattung zwischen Philosophie, Wissenvermittlung und dramatischer Inszenierung, Berlin, 234–74.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1988) Personhood and personality: The four-personae theory in De officiis I. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6: 169–99.Google Scholar
Girardet, K. (1983) Die Ordnung der Welt: Ein Beitrag zur philosophischen und politischen Interpretation von Ciceros Schrift De Legibus. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1988) Cicero’s philosophical affiliations. In Dillon, J. M. and Long, A. A. (eds.), The Question of Eclecticism: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy, Berkeley, 34–69.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1995) Probabile, veri simile, and related terms. In Powell, J. G. F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers, Oxford, 115–43.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (2001) Carneades in Rome: Some unsolved problems. In Powell, J. G. F. and North, J. A. (eds.), Cicero’s Republic, London, 57–82.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (2012) Cicero’s remarks on translating philosophical terms: Some general problems. In Glucker, J. and Burnett, C. (eds.), Greek into Latin from Antiquity until the Nineteenth Century, London, 37–96.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2007) What is ekphrasis for? Classical Philology 102: 1–19.Google Scholar
Gordon, P. (2012) The Invention and Gendering of Epicurus. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1974) Untersuchungen zu Ciceros Philosophie. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1988) From Athens to Tusculum: Gleaning the background of Cicero’s De oratore. Rhetorica 6: 215–35.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1995) Silencing the troublemaker: De legibus 1.39 and the continuity of Cicero’s scepticism. In Powell, J. G. F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers, Oxford, 85–113.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1997) Cicero’s philosophical stance in the Lucullus. In Inwood, B. and Mansfield, J. (eds.), Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books, Leiden, 36–57.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (2004) Kleine Schriften zur hellenistisch-römischen Philosophie. Leiden.Google Scholar
Gorman, R. (2005) The Socratic Method in the Dialogues of Cicero. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2002a) Cicero on the Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4. Translated and with Commentary. Chicago.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2002b) Managing mental pain: Epicurus vs. Aristippus on the pre-rehearsal of future ills. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 17: 155–77.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2007) Stoicism and Emotion. Chicago.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2012) Cicero and the perverse: The origins of error in De Legibus 1 and Tusculan Disputations 3. In Nicgorski, W. (ed.), Cicero’s Practical Philosophy, Notre Dame, 113–32.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2016) Honor and the honorable: Cato’s discourse in De Finibus 3. In Annas, J. and Betegh, G. (eds.), Cicero’s De Finibus: Philosophical Approaches, Cambridge, 119–46.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (1995) Philosophical badinage in Cicero’s letters to his friends. In Powell, J. G. F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers, Oxford, 325–46.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (1997) The composition of the Academica: Motives and versions. In Inwood, B. and Mansfield, J. (eds.), Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books, Leiden, 1–35.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (2011) The politics of virtue: Three puzzles in Cicero’s De Officiis. In Morison, B. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.), Episteme, etc., Oxford, 310–26.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (2017) Dignity in Roman and Stoic thought. In Debes, R. (ed.), Dignity: A History, Oxford, 47–65.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds.) (1989) Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. and Atkins, E. M. (1991) Cicero: On Duties. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grilli, A. (1971) I proemi del De Re Publica di Cicerone. Brescia.Google Scholar
Grilli, A. (2002) Cicerone tra retorica e filosofia. In Narducci, E. (ed.), Interpretare Cicerone: Percorsi della critica contemporanea, Florence, 53–65.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. (1992) Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Gurd, S. (2007) Cicero and editorial revision. Classical Antiquity 26: 49–80.Google Scholar
Hall, J. (1996) Social evasion and aristocratic manners in Cicero’s De oratore. American Journal of Philology 117: 95–120.Google Scholar
Haltenhoff, A. (2000) Cicero und die Philosophie. In Haltenhoff, A. and Mutschler, F.-H. (eds.), Hortus litterarum antiquarum: Festschrift für Hans Arnim Gärtner zum 70. Geburtstag, Heidelberg, 219–33.Google Scholar
Harlow, M. and Laurence, R. (2011) Viewing the old: Recording and respecting the elderly at Rome and in the empire. In Krötzl, C. and Mustakallio, K. (eds.), On Old Age: Approaching Death in Antiquity and the Middle Ages, Turnhout, 3–23.Google Scholar
Harries, J. (2006) Cicero and the Jurists. London.Google Scholar
Harries, J. (2007) Law and Crime in the Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harries, J. (2013) The law in Cicero’s writings. In Steel, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero, Cambridge, 107–21.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. (1979) War and Imperialism in Republican Rome 327–70 bc. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hathaway, R. F. (1968) Cicero, De re publica II, and his Socratic view of history. Journal of the History of Ideas 29: 3–12.Google Scholar
Hawley, M. C. (2020) Individuality and hierarchy in Cicero’s De officiis. European Journal of Political Theory 19: 87–105.Google Scholar
Henry, W. B. (2009) Philodemus: On Death. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Hine, H. (2016) Philosophy and philosophi: From Cicero to Apuleius. In Volk, K. and Williams, G. (eds.), Roman Reflections: Studies in Latin Philosophy, Oxford, 13–29.Google Scholar
Hodgson, L. (2017) Res Publica and the Roman Republic: ‘Without Body or Form’. Oxford.Google Scholar
Huby, P. (2001) The controversia between Dicaearchus and Theophrastus about the best life. In Fortenbaugh, W. and Schütrumpf, E. (eds.), Dicaearchus of Messana: Text, Translation, and Discussion, New Brunswick, 311–28.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (1998) Cicero’s Correspondence: A Literary Study. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (2011) The notion of enargeia in Hellenistic philosophy. In Morison, B. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.), Episteme etc: Essays in Honour of Jonathan Barnes, Oxford, 60–74.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, M. (1998) The Warrior’s Honor: Ethnic War and the Modern Conscience. New York.Google Scholar
Innes, D. C. (1995) Demetrius. On Style. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1990) Rhetorica disputatio: The strategy of de Finibus II. Apeiron 23: 143–64.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. and J. Mansfield (eds.) (1997) Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books. Leiden.Google Scholar
Isayev, E. (2007) Unruly youth? The myth of generation conflict in late republican Rome. Historia 56: 1–13.Google Scholar
Jaeger, M. (2002) Cicero and Archimedes’ tomb. Journal of Roman Studies 92: 49–61.Google Scholar
Jaeger, M. (2008) Archimedes and the Roman Imagination. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. T. (1981) Just War Tradition and the Restraint of War: A Moral and Historical Inquiry. Princeton.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. (1970) Cicero’s Cato. Rheinisches Museum 113: 188–96.Google Scholar
Kallet-Marx, R. (1990) The trial of Rutilius Rufus. Phoenix 44: 122–39.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. (2005) Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. New York.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. (2006) Marcus Tullius Cicero: Speech on Behalf of Publius Sestius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kechagia, E. (2011) Plutarch against Colotes: A Lesson in History of Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Keller, A. (2012) Cicero und der gerechte Krieg: Eine ethisch-staatsphilosophische Untersuchung. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Kerkhecker, A. (2002) Privato officio, non publico: Literaturwissenschaftliche Überlegungen zu Cicero’s Pro Marcello. In Scchwindt, J. P. (ed.), Klassische Philologie inter disciplinas: Aktuelle Konzepte zu Gegenstand und Methode eines Grundlagenfaches, Heidelberg, 93–149.Google Scholar
Keyes, C. W. (trans.) (1927) Cicero: De Re Publica, De Legibus. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Kierdorf, W. (1978) Ciceros Cato. Überlegungen zu einer verlorenen Schrift Ciceros. Rheinisches Museum 121: 167–84.Google Scholar
King, J. E. (trans.) (1945) Cicero: Tusculan Disputations. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Kleve, K. (1978) The philosophical polemics in Lucretius: A study in the history of Epicurean criticism. In Gigon, O. (ed.), Fondation Hardt, Entretiens 24, Geneva, 39–76.Google Scholar
Knoche, U. (1934) Der römische Ruhmesgedanke. Philologus 89: 102–24.Google Scholar
Koch, B. (2006) Philosophie als Medizin für die Seele: Untersuchungen zu Ciceros Tusculanae Disputationes. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Kohns, H. P. (1974) Consensus iuris—communio utilitatis. Gymnasium 81: 485–98.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2005) Clemency as a virtue. Classical Philology 100: 337–46.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. and Ramelli, I. (2009) Hierocles the Stoic. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Kraut, R. (1991) Return to the cave: Republic 519–21. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 7: 43–62.Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. A. (2005) Style and ideology in the Pro Marcello. In Welch, K. E. and Hillard, T. W. (eds.), Roman Crossings: Theory and Practice in the Roman Republic, Swansea, 279–312.Google Scholar
Kumaniecki, K. (1969) Cicero: De oratore. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. (2018) Exemplary Ethics in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. (1998) Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study (trans. Bliss, M. T., Jansen, A., and Orton, D. E.). Leiden.Google Scholar
Lebow, R. N. (2008) A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D., Pinkster, H., and Wisse, J. (1996) M. T. Cicero: De Oratore Libri III. Kommentar, vol.iv. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1997) Die künslerische Bedeutung der Platon-Nachfolge in Ciceros Cato 6–9. In Günther, H.-C. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Beiträge zur antiken Philosophie: Festschrift für Wolfgang Kullmann, Stuttgart, 287–95.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (2001) Panaitios und Ciceros Pflichtenlehre. Vom philosophischen Traktat zum politischen Lehrbuch. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (2007) Der Tithonos Aristons von Chios und Ciceros Cato: Von der philosophischen Theoria zur politischen Betätigung. Hermes 135: 43–65.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (2008) Philosophie unter der Tyrannis. Ciceros Tusculanae Disputationes. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Leonhardt, J. (1999) Ciceros Kritik der Philosophenschulen. Munich.Google Scholar
Levene, D. S. (1997) God and man in the classical Latin panegyric. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 43: 66–103.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1984) La dialectique de Cicéron dans les livres II et IV du De Finibus. Revue des Études Latines 62: 111–27.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2002) L’âme et le moi dans les « Tusculanes ». Revue des Études Latines 80: 78–94.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2012a) Cicéron et le problème des genres de vie: une problématique de la voluntas? In Bénatouïl, T. and Bonazzi, M. (eds.), Theoria, Praxis, and the Contemplative Life after Plato and Aristotle, Leiden, 57–74.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2012b) Philosophical life versus political Life: An impossible choice for Cicero? In Nicgorski, W. (ed.), Cicero’s Practical Philosophy, Notre Dame, 58–78.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2017) Cicero Academicus: Recherches sur les Académiques et sur la philosophie cicéronienne, 2nd ed. Rome.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. (1999) The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Løkke, H. (2015) Knowledge and Virtue in Early Stoicism. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1995a) Cicero’s politics in De officiis. In Laks, A. and Schofield, M. (eds.), Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy, Cambridge, 213–40.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1995b) Cicero’s Plato and Aristotle. In Powell, J. G. F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers, Oxford, 37–62.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2006) Pleasure and social utility: The virtues of being Epicurean. In Long, A. A. (ed.), From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy, Oxford, 178–201.Google Scholar
Long, A. G. (2015) Academic eloquence and the end of Cicero’s De finibus. Ancient Philosophy 35: 183–98.Google Scholar
Lühken, M. (2003) Zur Argumentation in der Vorrede von Ciceros De republica. Hermes 131: 34–45.Google Scholar
MacKendrick, P. (1989) The Philosophical Books of Cicero. London.Google Scholar
Marinone, N. and Malaspina, E. (eds.) (2004) Cronologia Ciceroniana, 2nd ed. Bologna.Google Scholar
Marquez, X. (2011) Cicero and the stability of states. History of Political Thought 32: 397–423.Google Scholar
Maso, S. (2009) Dignitatem tueri in Cicerone: dalla dimensione civile all’istanza filosofica. Méthexis 22: 77–100.Google Scholar
Maso, S. (2015) Grasp and Dissent: Cicero and Epicurean Philosophy. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Mattox, J. M. (2006) Augustine and the Theory of Just War. London and New York.Google Scholar
May, J. M. (1988) Trials of Character: The Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
May, J. M. and Wisse, J. (2001) Cicero: On the Ideal Orator. Oxford.Google Scholar
May, L. (2007) War Crimes and Just War. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McConnell, S. (2012) Cicero and Dicaearchus. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 42: 307–49.Google Scholar
McConnell, S. (2014) Philosophical Life in Cicero’s Letters. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McConnell, S. (2017) Magnitudo animi and cosmic politics in Cicero’s De re publica. Classical Journal 113: 45–70.Google Scholar
McConnell, S. (2019) Cicero and Socrates. In Moore, C. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Socrates, Leiden, 347–66.Google Scholar
Mebane, J. (2022) Cicero’s ideal statesman as the helmsman of the ship of state. Classical Philology 117: 120–38.Google Scholar
Michel, A. (1960) Rhétorique et philosophie chez Cicerón. Essai sur les fondements de l’art de persuader. Paris.Google Scholar
Michel, A. (1961) Rhétorique et philosophie dans les Tusculanes. Revue des Études Latines 39: 158–71.Google Scholar
Michel, A. (1969) Les lois de la guerre et les problèmes de l’impérialisme Romain dans la philosophie de Cicéron. In Brisson, J.-P. (ed.), Problèmes de la guerre à Rome, Paris, 172–83.Google Scholar
Michel, A. (1973) Rhétorique et philosophie dans les traités de Cicéron. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt I, 3: 139–208.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. N. (1991) Cicero: The Senior Statesman. New Haven.Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. (1988) Epicurus’ Ethical Theory. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Moatti, C. (2015) The Birth of Critical Thinking in Republican Rome (trans. Lloyd, J.). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1941) Review of B. Farrington, Science and Politics in the Ancient World. Journal of Roman Studies 31: 149–57.Google Scholar
Müller, G. M. and Mariani Zini, F. (eds.) (2018) Philosophie in Rom—Römische Philosophie? Kultur-, literatur- und philosophiegeschichtliche Perspektiven. Berlin.Google Scholar
Müller, R. (1989) Das Problem Theorie‐Praxis in der Peripatos‐Rezeption von Ciceros Staatsschrift. In Fortenbaugh, W. and Steinmetz, P. (eds.), Cicero’s Knowledge of the Peripatos, New Brunswick, 101–13.Google Scholar
Narducci, E. (1983) Cicerone e un detto di Cesare (nota a Pro Marcello 25 sgg. e a Cato Maior). Atene e Roma 28: 155–8.Google Scholar
Narducci, E. (2002a) Brutus: The history of Roman eloquence. In May, J. M. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, Leiden, 401–25.Google Scholar
Narducci, E. (2002b) Orator and the definition of the ideal orator. In May, J. M. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, Leiden, 427–43.Google Scholar
Nicgorski, W. (1984) Cicero’s paradoxes and his idea of utility. Political Theory 12: 557–78.Google Scholar
Nicgorski, W. (ed.) (2012) Cicero’s Practical Philosophy. Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Nicgorski, W. (2016) Cicero’s Skepticism and His Recovery of Political Philosophy. Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Nikolsky, B. (2001) Epicurus on pleasure. Phronesis 46: 440–65.Google Scholar
North, J. A. (1981) The development of Roman imperialism. Journal of Roman Studies 71: 1–9.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1997) Kant and Stoic cosmopolitanism. The Journal of Political Philosophy 5: 1–25.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2000) Duties of justice, duties of material aid: Cicero’s problematic legacy. The Journal of Political Philosophy 8: 176–206.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2019) Cosmopolitanism: A Noble but Flawed Ideal. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (1996) Philodemus: On Piety I. Oxford.Google Scholar
Olgilvie, R. M. (1965) A Commentary on Livy: Books 1–5. Oxford.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (1998) In Search of the Truth. Academic Tendencies in Middle Platonism. Brussels.Google Scholar
Orend, B. (2008) War. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL=http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/war/.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. (1983) Philosophical invective. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1: 1–25.Google Scholar
Parkin, T. (2003) Old Age in the Roman World: A Cultural and Social History. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Peetz, S. (2005) Ciceros Konzept des probabile. Philosophisches Jahrbuch 112: 97–133.Google Scholar
Pittet, A. (1955) Le mot consensus chez Sénèque. Ses acceptions philosophique et politique. Museum Helveticum 12: 35–46.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1931) Cicero De republica als Kunstwerk. In Fraenkel, E. and Fränkel, H. (eds.), Festschrift für R. Reitzenstein, Leipzig, 70–105.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1934) Antikes Führertum: Cicero De officiis und das Lebensideal des Panaitios. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (1988) Cicero: Cato maior de senectute. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (1994) The rector rei publicae of Cicero’s De Republica. Scripta Classica Israelica 13: 19–29.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (ed.) (1995) Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers. Oxford.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (ed.) (2006) M. Tulli Ciceronis De re publica, De legibus, Cato maior de senectute. Laelius de amicitia. Oxford.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (2012) Cicero’s De re publica and the virtues of a statesman. In Nicgorski, W. (ed.), Cicero’s Practical Philosophy, Notre Dame, 14–42.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (2013) The embassy of the three philosophers to Rome in 155 bc. In Kremmydas, C. and Tempest, K. (eds.), Hellenistic Oratory: Continuity and Change, Oxford, 219–47.Google Scholar
Rabbow, P. (1954) Seelenführung. Methodik der Exerzitien in der Antike. Munich.Google Scholar
Rambaud, M. (1984) Le Pro Marcello et l’insinuation politique. In Chevallier, R. (ed.), Présence de Cicéron, Paris, 43–56.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1972) Cicero the historian and Cicero the antiquarian. Journal of Roman Studies 62: 33–45.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1975) Cicero: A Portrait. London.Google Scholar
Reid, J. (ed.) (1885) M. Tulli Ciceronis Academica. London.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2000) Rhetoric in the Fourth Academy. Classical Quarterly 50: 531–47.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2003) Cicero, Topica with Translation, Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Remer, G. (2017) Ethics and the Orator: The Ciceronian Tradition of Political Morality. Chicago.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (2005) The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. (1983) Text and Transmission. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rich, J. (2011) The fetiales and Roman international relations. In Richardson, J. H. and Santangelo, F. (eds.), Priests and the State in the Roman World, Stuttgart, 187–242.Google Scholar
Rochlitz, S. (1993) Das Bild Caesars in Ciceros Orationes Caesarianae: Untersuchungen zur clementia und sapientia Caesaris. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2005) On the Path to Virtue. The Stoic Doctrine of Moral Progress and its Reception in (Middle-)Platonism. Leuven.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2007) A Commentary on Plutarch’s De latenter vivendo. Leuven.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2012) Will the Epicurean sage break the law if he is perfectly sure that he will escape detection? A difficult problem revisited. Transactions of the American Philological Association 142: 23–40.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2019) From A minor to A major. A reappraisal of the Anonymous Interlocutor in Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations. Eikasmos 30: 117–39.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. (2012) Plato: Republic. London.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. (trans.) (1998) Cicero: The Republic and the Laws. London.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. (2008) The Fetials and their ius. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 51: 63–93.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. (1998) What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Scatolin, A. (2018) Cicero’s praise of Caesar in the Pro Marcello—a reassessment of a rhetorical strategy. In Montefusco, L. C. and Celentano, M. S. (eds.), Papers on Rhetoric 16, Perugia, 135–50.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. A. (2017) Das « Somnium Scipionis » im Kontext des dritten Bücherpaares (De re publica V und VI). In Höffe, O. (ed.), Ciceros Staatsphilosophie: Ein kooperativer Kommentar zu De re publica und De legibus, Berlin, 133–48.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. G. (1995) Philosophische Polemik bei Cicero. Rheinisches Museum 138: 222–47.Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. L. (1969) Die Abfassungszeit von Ciceros Schrift über die Gesetze. Rome.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1995a) Cicero’s definition of res publica. In Powell, J. G. F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers, Oxford, 63–83.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1995b) Two Stoic approaches to justice. In Laks, A. and Schofield, M. (eds.), Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy, Cambridge, 191–212.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1999) Morality and the law: The case of Diogenes of Babylon. In Schofield, M. (ed.), Saving the City: Philosopher-Kings and Other Classical Paradigms, London, 160–77.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2002) Academic therapy: Philo of Larissa and Cicero’s project in the Tusculans. In Clark, G. and Rajak, T. (eds.), Philosophy and Power in the Graeco-Roman World. Essays in Honour of Miriam Griffin, Oxford, 91–109.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2008) Ciceronian dialogue. In Goldhill, S. (ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity, Cambridge, 63–84.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2012a) The fourth virtue. In Nicgorski, W. (ed.), Cicero’s Practical Philosophy, Notre Dame, 43–57.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2012b) The neutralizing argument: Carneades, Antiochus, Cicero. In Sedley, D. (ed.), The Philosophy of Antiochus, Cambridge, 237–49.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2015) Liberty, equality, and authority: A political discourse in the later Roman Republic. In Hammer, D. (ed.), A Companion to Greek Democracy and the Roman Republic, Oxford, 113–27.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2017a) Cicero’s Plato. In Engberg-Pedersen, T. (ed.), From Stoicism to Platonism: The Development of Philosophy, 100 bce–100 ce, Cambridge, 47–66.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2017b) Cicero on imperialism and the soul. In Seaford, R., Wilkins, J., and Wright, M. (eds.), Selfhood and the Soul: Essays on Ancient Thought and Literature in Honour of Christopher Gill, Oxford, 107–24.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2018) Cicero on auctoritas. In Bryan, J., Wardy, R., and Warren, J. (eds.), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, Cambridge, 278–95.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2021) Cicero: Political Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Schrenk, L. P. (1994) Cicero on rhetoric and philosophy: Tusculan Disputations I. Ancient Philosophy 14: 355–60.Google Scholar
Schütrumpf, E. (1988) Platonic elements in the structure of Cicero, De oratore book 1. Rhetorica 6: 237–58.Google Scholar
Schütrumpf, E. (1990) Cicero De oratore 1 and Greek philosophical tradition. Rheinisches Museum 133: 310–21.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1997) The Ethics of Brutus and Cassius. Journal of Roman Studies 87: 41–53.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1999) The Stoic-Platonist debate on kathēkonta. In Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.), Topics in Stoic Philosophy, Oxford, 128–52.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2013) Cicero and the Timaeus. In Schofield, M. (ed.), Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century bc, Cambridge, 187–205.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2019) Epicurus on dialectic. In Bénatouïl, T. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.), Dialectic after Plato and Aristotle, Cambridge, 82–113.Google Scholar
Seng, H. (1998) Aufbau und Argumentation in Ciceros Tusculanae Disputationes. Rheinisches Museum 141: 329–47.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1965–70) Cicero’s Letters to Atticus, 7 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1977) Cicero: Epistulae ad Familiares, 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (2001) Cicero: Letters to Friends, 3 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Smith, P. R. (1995) ‘A self-indulgent misuse of leisure and writing’? How not to write philosophy: Did Cicero get it right? In Powell, J. G. F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers, Oxford, 301–23.Google Scholar
Steel, C. (2005) Reading Cicero: Genre and Performance in Late Republican Rome. London.Google Scholar
Steel, C. (2022) Philosophy in Cicero’s speeches. In Atkins, J. W. and Bénatouïl, T. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero’s Philosophy, Cambridge, 59–70.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, P. (1989) Beobachtungen zu Ciceros philosophischem Standpunkt. In Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Steinmetz, P. (eds.), Cicero’s Knowledge of the Peripatos, New Brunswick, 1–22.Google Scholar
Stem, R. (2005) The first eloquent Stoic: Cicero on Cato the Younger. Classical Journal 101: 37–49.Google Scholar
Stewart, G. (2017) Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 bce–43 bce). In Brunstetter, D. R. and O’Driscoll, C. (eds.), Just War Thinkers: From Cicero to the 21st Century, Abingdon, 8–20.Google Scholar
Stocker, M. (1976) The schizophrenia of modern ethical theories. Journal of Philosophy 73: 453–66.Google Scholar
Stockton, D. (1971) Cicero: A Political Biography. Oxford.Google Scholar
Stokes, M. C. (1995) Cicero on Epicurean pleasures. In Powell, J. G. F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers, Oxford, 145–70.Google Scholar
Strasburger, H. (1990) Ciceros philosophisches Spätwerk als Aufruf gegen die Herrschaft Caesars. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Straumann, B. (2015) Roman Law in the State of Nature: The Classical Foundations of Hugo Grotius’ Natural Law Theory. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Straumann, B. (2016) Crisis and Constitutionalism: Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution. Oxford.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (2002) Commentary on Graver. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 17: 178–82.Google Scholar
Stroup, S. C. (2013) ‘When I read my Cato, it is as if Cato speaks’: The birth and evolution of Cicero’s dialogic voice. In Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J. (eds.), The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity, Oxford, 123–51.Google Scholar
Stull, W. (2013) On encountering Cephalus in De senectute. American Journal of Philology 134: 37–47.Google Scholar
Sullivan, F. A. (1941) Cicero and gloria. Transactions of the American Philological Association 72: 382–91.Google Scholar
Sumner, G. V. (1973) The Orators in Cicero’s Brutus: Prosopography and Chronology. Toronto.Google Scholar
Swift, J. L. (1983) The Early Fathers on War and Military Service. Wilmington.Google Scholar
Syse, H. (2010) The Platonic roots of just war doctrine: A reading of Plato’s Republic. Diametros 23: 104–23.Google Scholar
Tedeschi, A. (1996) La vita del sapiens: finalità e limiti. A proposito di una schermaglia retorico-filosofica in Cic. Marc. 25–27. Bollettino di studi latini 26: 464–81.Google Scholar
Syse, H. (2005) Lezione di buon governo per un dittatore: Cicerone, Pro Marcello. Saggio di commento. Bari.Google Scholar
Tempest, K. (2011) Cicero: Politics and Persuasion in Ancient Rome. London.Google Scholar
Tempest, K. (2013a) An ethos of sincerity: Echoes of the De republica in Cicero’s Pro Marcello. Greece and Rome 60: 262–80.Google Scholar
Tempest, K. (2013b) Hellenistic oratory at Rome: Cicero’s Pro Marcello. In Kremmydas, C. and Tempest, K. (eds.), Hellenistic Oratory: Continuity and Change, Oxford, 295–318.Google Scholar
Testard, M. (1958) Saint Augustin et Cicéron, 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. A. C. (1975) The Institutes of Justinian: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Thomas, Y.-P. (1980) Res, chose et patrimonie (Note sur le rapport sujet-objet en droit romaine). Archives de Philosophie du Droit 25: 413–26.Google Scholar
Thorsrud, H. (2012) Radical and mitigated skepticism in Cicero’s Academica. In Nicgorski, W. (ed.), Cicero’s Practical Philosophy, Notre Dame, 133–51.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. (2003) Chrysippus’ On Affections: Reconstruction and Interpretation. Leiden.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. (2007a) Philodemus and the Epicurean tradition. In Ioppolo, A. M. and Sedley, D. N. (eds.), Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers: Hellenistic Philosophy in the Period 155–86 bc, Naples, 339–97.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. (2007b) The Ethics of Philodemus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Usher, S. (trans.) (1974) Dionysius of Halicarnassus Volume VIII Critical Essays, Volume I: Ancient Orators. Lysias. Isocrates. Isaeus. Demosthenes. Thucydides. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
van der Blom, H. (2010) Cicero’s Role Models: The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford.Google Scholar
van Straaten, M. (1952) Panaetii Rhodii Fragmenta. Leiden.Google Scholar
Vassaly, A. (1993) Representations: Images of the World in Ciceronian Oratory. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Vaughn, J. (1985) Law and rhetoric in the Causa Curiana. Classical Antiquity 4: 208–22.Google Scholar
Verbaal, W. (2005/6) Cicero and Dionysius the Elder, or the end of liberty. Classical World 99: 145–56.Google Scholar
Vesperini, P. (ed.) (2017) Philosophari: Usages romains des savoirs grecs sous la République et sous l’Empire. Paris.Google Scholar
Vickers, B. (1988) In Defence of Rhetoric. Oxford.Google Scholar
Vogt, K. (2008) Law, Reason, and the Cosmic City. Oxford.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2021a) Caesar the Epicurean? A matter of life and death. In Yona, S. and Davis, G. (eds.), Epicurus in Rome: Philosophical Perspectives in the Ciceronian Age, Cambridge, 72–86.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2021b) The Roman Republic of Letters: Scholarship, Philosophy, and the Politics in the Age of Cicero and Caesar. Princeton.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (forthcoming 2023) Philosophy. In Gibson, R. and Whitton, C. (eds.), The Cambridge Critical Guide to Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Volk, K. and Williams, G. (eds.) (2016) Roman Reflections: Studies in Latin Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
von Albrecht, M. (2003) Cicero’s Style: A Synopsis Followed by Selected Analytic Studies. Leiden.Google Scholar
von Heyking, J. (2007) Taming warriors in classical and early medieval political theory. In Syse, H. and Reichberg, G. M. (eds.), Ethics, Nationalism, and Just War: Medieval and Contemporary Perspectives, Washington, DC, 11–35.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1973) Political action: The problem of dirty hands. Philosophy and Public Affairs 2: 160–80.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1977) Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2004) Facing Death: Epicurus and His Critics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2013) The harm of death in Cicero’s First Tusculan Disputation. In Taylor, J. S. (ed.), The Metaphysics and Ethics of Death: New Essays, Oxford, 44–70.Google Scholar
Wassmann, H. (1996) Ciceros Widerstand gegen Caesars Tyrannis: Untersuchungen zur politischen Bedeutung der philosophischen Spätschriften. Bonn.Google Scholar
Westman, R. (1955) Plutarch gegen Colotes: seine Schrift Adversus Colotem als Philosophiegeschichtliche Quelle. Helsinki.Google Scholar
White, P. (2010) Cicero in Letters. Oxford.Google Scholar
White, S. A. (1995) Cicero and the therapists. In Powell, J. G. F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers, Oxford, 219–46.Google Scholar
White, S. A. (2001) Principes sapientiae: Dicaearchus’ Biography of Philosophy. In Fortenbaugh, W. and Schütrumpf, E. (eds.), Dicaearchus of Messana: Text, Translation, and Discussion, New Brunswick, 185–236.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, T. (1986) The Fetiales: A reconsideration. Classical Quarterly 36: 478–90.Google Scholar
Wilcox, A. (2012) The Gift of Correspondence: Friendship in Cicero’s Ad Familiares and Seneca’s Moral Epistles. Madison.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (2002) Believing the Pro Marcello. In Miller, J. F., Damon, C., and Myers, K. S. (eds.), Vertis in usum: Studies in Honor of Edward Courtney, Munich, 24–38.Google Scholar
Wirszubski, C. (1950) Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wirszubski, C. (1954) Cicero’s cum dignitate otium: A reconsideration. Journal of Roman Studies 44: 1–13.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (2009) Remembering the Roman People. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wisse, J. (2002a) The intellectual background of Cicero’s rhetorical works. In May, J. M. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, Leiden, 331–74.Google Scholar
Wisse, J. (2002b) De Oratore: Rhetoric, philosophy and the making of the ideal orator. In May, J. M. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, Leiden, 375–400.Google Scholar
Wöhrle, G. (2010) Cicero über Gesundheit, Krankheit, Ärzte. Göttinger Forum für Altertumswissenschaft 13: 159–88.Google Scholar
Wood, N. (1988) Cicero’s Social and Political Thought. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Woolf, R. (2007) Particularism, promises, and persons in Cicero’s De officiis. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 33: 317–46.Google Scholar
Woolf, R. (2013) Cicero and Gyges. Classical Quarterly 63: 801–12.Google Scholar
Woolf, R. (2015) Cicero: The Philosophy of a Roman Sceptic. Abingdon.Google Scholar
Woolf, R. (2022) Ethical theory and the good life. In Atkins, J. W. and Bénatouïl, T. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero’s Philosophy, Cambridge, 166–83.Google Scholar
Wynne, J. P. F. (2019) Cicero on the Philosophy of Religion: On the Nature of the Gods and on Divination. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zanker, G. (1981) Enargeia in the ancient criticism of poetry. Rheinisches Museum 124: 297–311.Google Scholar
Zarecki, J. (2014) Cicero’s Ideal Statesman in Theory and Practice. London.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (ed.) (1995) Cicero: De Re Publica. Selections. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1996) Natural law and poetic justice: A Carneadean debate in Cicero and Virgil. Classical Philology 91: 297–319.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2001) Citizen and commonwealth in De re publica, book 4. In Powell, J. G. F. and North, J. A. (eds.), Cicero’s Republic, London, 83–97.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2003) Plato with pillows: Cicero on the uses of Greek culture. In Braund, D. and Gill, C. (eds.), Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman, Exeter, 119–38.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2013) A contract on Ameria: Law and legality in Cicero’s Pro Roscio Amerino. American Journal of Philology 134: 425–44.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2017a) The attack on justice: Cicero, Lactantius, and Carneades. Rheinisches Museum 160: 299–319.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2017b) Cicero on the origins of civilization and society: The preface to De re publica book 3. American Journal of Philology 138: 461–87.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (trans.) (2017c) Cicero: On the Commonwealth and on the Laws, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2022) The Lost Republic: Cicero’s De oratore and De re publica. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ziegler, K. (1969) M. Tulli Ciceronia De Re Publica. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Zini, F. M. (2018) Argumentation als Trost. Bemerkungen über Ciceros Tusculanen, Buch I. In Müller, G. M. and Zini, F. M. (eds.), Philosophie in Rom—Römische Philosophie? Kultur-, literatur- und philosophiegeschichtliche Perspektiven, Berlin, 327–48.Google Scholar
Zoll, G. (1962) Cicero, Platonis aemulus. Zurich.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×