Post-Racial Constitutionalism and the Roberts Court Rhetorical Neutrality and the Perpetuation of Inequality
Book contents
- Post-Racial Constitutionalism and the Roberts Court
- Post-Racial Constitutionalism and the Roberts Court
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Rhetorical Neutrality and Post-Racial Historicism
- 2 The Burger and Rehnquist Courts
- 3 The Roberts Court and Post-Racial Constitutionalism
- 4 Post-Racial Process Discourse
- 5 Fisher II
- 6 Ricci v. DeStefano
- 7 Texas Department of Housing Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.
- 8 Voting Rights
- Conclusion
- Index
8 - Voting Rights
Contrived Federalism and the Problem of Second-Generation Discrimination
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2022
Book contents
- Post-Racial Constitutionalism and the Roberts Court
- Post-Racial Constitutionalism and the Roberts Court
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Rhetorical Neutrality and Post-Racial Historicism
- 2 The Burger and Rehnquist Courts
- 3 The Roberts Court and Post-Racial Constitutionalism
- 4 Post-Racial Process Discourse
- 5 Fisher II
- 6 Ricci v. DeStefano
- 7 Texas Department of Housing Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.
- 8 Voting Rights
- Conclusion
- Index
Summary
The Roberts Court has shifted power to the states to determine the boundaries of political power with Blacks and other discrete and insular minorities losing electoral power.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Post-Racial Constitutionalism and the Roberts CourtRhetorical Neutrality and the Perpetuation of Inequality, pp. 184 - 213Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022