Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: The Post-Migratory Postcolonial
- I Generations and Designations
- Difference-Conscious Critical Media Engagement and the Communitarian Question
- Banlieue Writers: The Struggle for Literary Recognition through Collective Mobilization
- Francophone and Post-Migratory Afropeans within and beyond France Today
- II Postmemory, or Telling the Past to the Present
- III Urban Cultures/Identities
- IV Imaginings in Visual Languages
- Afterword: A Long Road to Travel
- About the Contributors
- Index
Banlieue Writers: The Struggle for Literary Recognition through Collective Mobilization
from I - Generations and Designations
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: The Post-Migratory Postcolonial
- I Generations and Designations
- Difference-Conscious Critical Media Engagement and the Communitarian Question
- Banlieue Writers: The Struggle for Literary Recognition through Collective Mobilization
- Francophone and Post-Migratory Afropeans within and beyond France Today
- II Postmemory, or Telling the Past to the Present
- III Urban Cultures/Identities
- IV Imaginings in Visual Languages
- Afterword: A Long Road to Travel
- About the Contributors
- Index
Summary
What is a writer? Some would say that a writer is someone who writes regularly. Others might say that a writer is someone whose work is published by a major publishing house. Yet others would define a writer as someone whose work is read widely. These few responses reveal the social, constructed, and relational nature of literary identity and identification, and show that to be a writer means, first and foremost, being identified as such by a social community. From a Bourdieusian perspective, such identification stems from successful integration into the literary field, as defined by the field's socially dominant gatekeepers. As Gérard Mauger notes, ‘l'accès au métier d'artiste est toujours subordonné à un droit d'entrée ou à un capital spécifique – c'est là une propriété de n'importe quel champ de production de biens symboliques – mais ce droit d'entrée est plus ou moins codifié, formalisé, objectivé, scolairement certifié’ (2006: 11). Recourse to the concept of a ‘right of entry’ thus underscores the unequal nature of a system that governs literary recognition.
In a study of the social and geographic dynamics of literary prize attribution, Sylvie Ducas analyses the place held by francophone writers in the French literary field:
Le palmarès des grands prix littéraires d'automne révèle la sous-représentation des écrivains francophones […]. Cette position minoritaire dans la compétition littéraire n'empêche pas l'extrême diversité des littératures francophones primées, puisque l'on trouve aussi bien des représentants de la francophonie belge, suisse mais aussi francophonie des îles et de l'Afrique du nord, et enfin des pays slaves. Toutefois, si dans cette frange minoritaire, la surreprésentation des pays d'Europe est évidente, inversement, la sous-représentation des pays d'Afrique ne trouve qu'une faible compensation dans des prix de moindre importance. (2001: 348)
In this instance, the separation of the categories ‘francophone literature’ – highlighting the non-Frenchness of the writer – and ‘French literature – indicating the Frenchness of the writer – reveals ways of classifying works independent of their formal properties. Further, as Ducas aptly notes, within the group of non-French writers in French, those from Africa are more often subject to literary marginalization.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Post-Migratory Cultures in Postcolonial France , pp. 44 - 59Publisher: Liverpool University PressPrint publication year: 2018