Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:25:18.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Mitigation through resource transfers to developing countries: expanding greenhouse gas offsets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Joseph E. Aldy
Affiliation:
Resources for the Future
Robert N. Stavins
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Both developing and developed countries hold a central view in common in international climate negotiations: each thinks the other should be doing more to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. To date, international negotiations and agreements on climate change have not been particularly successful in creating significant changes in either the commitments or actions being adopted by developing countries with respect to GHG mitigation. Our proposal in this chapter is to build on existing offset policies to enhance efforts by developing countries to combat climate change.

For a variety of environmental and political reasons, focusing on developing countries is crucial at this stage in the climate regime's evolution (Frankel 2007). Most obviously, large developing countries —especially India and China—account for an increasingly important share of global emissions as a result of rapid population and GDP growth (Stern 2007: 169). The International Energy Agency forecasts that three-quarters of the increase in global energy use over the next two decades will come from developing countries (IEA 2007). A successful climate architecture will have to include mitigation in these parts of the world. At the same time, the world's largest emitter, the United States, has made participation in binding emissions reduction contingent on actions by large emitters in the South. Thus developing country participation has emerged as the lynchpin of progress in global climate negotiations.

One possibility is to encourage developing countries to participate by assuming mitigation commitments, just as their richer counterparts do. While this is a potentially viable strategy in the long run, it is unrealistic and not essential in the short term.

Type
Chapter
Information
Post-Kyoto International Climate Policy
Implementing Architectures for Agreement
, pp. 439 - 468
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×