Hip oral core topics

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511575327.019

16 - Hip oral core topics

from Section 4 - Adult elective orthopaedics oral

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 August 2009

Paul A. Banaszkiewicz

Edited by

Paul A. Banaszkiewicz

Edited in association with

Deiary F. Kader and

Nicola Maffulli

Show author details

Paul A. Banaszkiewicz: Affiliation:
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead
Deiary F. Kader: Affiliation:
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead
Nicola Maffulli: Affiliation:
Keele University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Anatomy of the hip

Blood supply of femoral head

This is a favourite question in either the basic science or the adult/pathology oral. This may lead into a discussion about avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. The blood supply has three sources:

Medial circumflex femoral artery is the most important supply; it is a branch of the profunda femoris artery
Lateral circumflex artery supplies the inferior portion; it is a branch of the profunda femoris artery
Artery of the ligamentum teres is a minor blood supply in the adult; it is a posterior branch of the obturator artery

The extracapsular arterial ring gives off ascending cervical arteries known as retinacular arteries. Injury to the retinacular arteries may lead to AVN.

Examination corner

Basic science oral 1

Second question after an initial discussion on the position that a leg assumes after a traumatic posterior and anterior dislocation of the hip.

Examiner: What is the blood supply to the femoral head?

Candidate: The blood supply to the femoral head is derived from the medial and lateral femoral circumflex arteries; these are branches of the profunda femoris artery. They form an extracapsular arterial ring around the base of the trochanter. Ascending cervical arteries are given off this ring and then branch into retinacular arteries, which form a subsynovial intracapsular arterial ring …

The candidate was stopped in mid-sentence by the examiner, who was satisfied with the answer and wanted to move on to another question. This led on to a discussion of AVN of the hip, types of THA to use in a young patient, survival analysis curves, etc.[…]

Type: Chapter
Information: Postgraduate Orthopaedics
The Candidate's Guide to the FRCS (TR & Orth) Examination
, pp. 155 - 193

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575327.019 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Calder, JD, Pearse, MF, Revell, PA (2001) The extent of osteocyte death in the proximal femur of patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(3): 419–22.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mont, MA, Hungerford, DS (1995) Non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(3): 459–74.Google Scholar

Kantor, SG, Huo, MH, Huk, OL, Salvati, EA (1996) Cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis: a 6-year minimum follow-up study of second-generation cement techniques. J Arthroplasty 11: 267–271.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lidwell, OM, Lowbury, EJ, Whyte, W, Blowers, R, Stanley, SJ, Lowe, D (1982) Effect of ultraclean air in operating rooms on deep sepsis in the joint after total hip or knee replacement: a randomised study. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 285(6334): 10–14.Google Scholar

Mont, MA, Carbone, JJ, Fairbank, AC (1996) Core decompression versus nonoperative management for osteonecrosis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 324:169–78.Google Scholar

Sugioka, Y, Hotokebuchi, T, Tsutsui, H (1992) Transtrochanteric anterior rotational osteotomy for idiopathic and steroid-induced necrosis of the femoral head. Indications and long-term results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 277: 111–20Google Scholar

Hirst, P, Esser, M, Murphy, JC, Hardinge, K (1987). Bone grafting for protrusion acetabuli during total hip replacement. A review of the Wrightington method in 61 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69(2):229–33.Google Scholar

Hedlundh, U, Ahnfelt, L, Hybbinette, CH, Weckstrom, J, Fredin, H (1996) Surgical experience related to dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78: 206–9.Google Scholar

Glithero, PR, Grigoris, P, Herding, LKet al. (1993) White cell scans and infected joint replacements. Failure to detect chronic infection. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75(3): 371–4.Google Scholar

Robbins, GM, Masri, BA, Garbuz, DS, Duncan, CP (2002) Evaluation of pain in patients with apparently solidly fixed total hip arthroplasty components. J Am Acad Ortho Surg 10: 86–94Google Scholar

Mirra, JM, Amstutz, HC, Matos, M, Gold, R (1976) The pathology of the joint tissues and its clinical relevance in prosthesis failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 117:221–40.Google Scholar

Lonner, JH, Desai, P, Dicesare, PE, Steiner, G, Zuckerman, JD (1996) The reliability of analysis of intraoperative frozen sections for identifying active infection during revision hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78(10): 1553–8.Google Scholar

Zimmerli, W, Trampuz, A, Ochsner, PE (2004) Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med 351: 1645–54.Google Scholar

Buchholz, HW, Elson, RA, Engelbrecht, E, Lodenkämper, H, Röttger, J, Siegel, A (1981) Management of deep infection of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63:342–53.Google Scholar

Wroblewski, BM (1986) One-stage revision of infected cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 211:103–7.Google Scholar

McDonald, DJ, Fitzgerald, RH Jr, Ilstrup, DM (1989) Two-stage reconstruction of a total hip arthroplasty because of infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71(6): 828–34.Google Scholar

Gruen, TA, McNeice, GM, Amstutz, HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17–27.Google Scholar

Brooker, AF, Bowerman, JW, Robinson, RA, Riley, LH Jr. (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55(8): 1629–32.Google Scholar

Horwitz, BR, Rockowitz, NL, Goll, SRet al. (1993) A prospective randomized comparison of two surgical approaches to total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 291: 154–63Google Scholar

Kim, YY, Ko, CU, Ahn, JY, Yoon, YS, Kwak, BM (1988) Charnley low friction arthroplasty in tuberculosis of the hip. An eight to 13-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70(5): 756–60.Google Scholar