The general lack of scholarly interest in the contribution of island cultures to postcolonial debate, as underlined by the Caribbean/South Pacific scholar Elizabeth Deloughrey (2001a: 22), takes on specific dimensions within Francophone postcolonial studies. While Caribbean authors have elicited much interest, literature from the Mascarenes and the South Pacific remains to a large extent excluded both from Francophone research conducted in Europe or North America and from Anglophone postcolonial discussions of regional identity. Comparative readings have the potential, however, to reveal rifts and commonalities.

The identification of an appropriate terminology emerges as the first challenge facing such readings across cultural boundaries. French-speaking islands range in status from independent states, such as Haiti, Mauritius or ni-Vanuatu, to France's ‘far-flung extra-continental territories’ (Brown, 2005b: 42). Though the latter are still often referred to as ‘Départements and Territoires d'Outre-Mer’ (DOM-TOM), most were assigned a new status in 2003, when French Guyana, Guadeloupe, Martinique and Réunion became ‘Départements and Régions d'Outre-Mer’ (DOM-ROM), Saint-Pierre-and-Miquelon, Mayotte, French Polynesia and Wallis-and-Futuna ‘Collectivités d'outre-mer’ (CT), while the uninhabited ‘Terres Australes et Antarctiques Françaises’ (TAAF) retained its appellation. New Caledonia's status is more ambiguous. The labels ‘Pays d'Outre-Mer’ (POM) and ‘Collectivité Sui Generis’ are both used, but the status of Pays d'Outre-Mer does not appear in the 1998 Noumea Agreements.