Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:54:25.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Modern mindsets or empowered women?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2010

Roger Jeffery
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Patricia Jeffery
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

The idea that ‘modern’ people can not only ensure that their children live to maturity, but can also act ‘rationally’ to limit the number of children they have, is at the source of the modern discipline of demography in the disputes between Malthus and Condorcet at the end of the eighteenth century. Whereas Malthus was sceptical of the possible role of ‘moral restraint’, Condorcet believed that the abolition of prejudice and superstition, encouraged by the spread of education (particularly of women) would lead people to choose small families voluntarily (Sen 1995). Thus the idea that economic and social changes – urbanization and industrialization in particular – would bring new ways of thinking and understanding in their wake has a long pedigree. It was taken up most thoroughly in the 1960s, when the sociology of social and economic change was heavily influenced by the work of Talcott Parsons and Wilbert Moore. One of the most extended pieces of research in this perspective was organized at Harvard, and involved questionnaires administered to men (but not women) in countries in Africa, Latin America and Asia (including Pakistan). It was published under the title Becoming Modern (Inkeles and Smith 1974). Within sociology, work in this genre has been heavily criticized for its valueladen evolutionary schema in which contemporary US small-town society was treated as the archetype of the ‘modern’. Writers using this approach have failed to take seriously differences in historical, cultural and economic context, have often used teleological arguments, and have made naive and often ethnocentric assumptions about the inevitability of ‘progress’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Population, Gender and Politics
Demographic Change in Rural North India
, pp. 165 - 211
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×