Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:09:19.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Clonal biology of caespitose grasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2009

G. P. Cheplick
Affiliation:
City University of New York
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Graminoids comprise one of the largest subgroups of clonal plants among terrestrial angiosperms (Tiffney & Niklas, 1985). Caespitose graminoids represent a unique growth form that is characterized by the compact spatial arrangement of ramets within individual clones and the absence of rhizomes or stolons. Caespitose graminoids occur on all continents from the high Arctic to the Sub-Antarctic and are distributed over a wide range of precipitation zones (Leith, 1978; Walter, 1979). This growth form is particularly dominant in the grassland biome which occupies 24 million km2 including tropical and temperate grasslands, savannas and shrub steppe (Leith, 1978).

The wide distribution and dominance expressed by caespitose graminoids is somewhat surprising given that the majority of modern monocot families are rhizomatous (Tiffney & Niklas, 1985). Rhizomes are modified horizontal ramets located belowground that represent a mode of clonal growth well suited for ramet dispersal, effective resource acquisition, and resource storage (Grace, 1993). In contrast, caespitose graminoids possess several attributes that could potentially limit their success, including intense intraclonal competition for nutrients (Hartnett, 1993) and for photosynthetically active radiation (Caldwell et al., 1983; Ryel, Beyschlag & Caldwell, 1993,1994), and a limited ability to access heterogeneously distributed resources (Van Auken, Manwaring & Caldwell, 1992). This poses the question, ‘what structural and/or functional attributes contribute to the ecological success of caespitose graminoids without the benefits conferred by rhizomes?’ The adaptive value of caespitose clones must be sufficient to offset the benefits associated with rhizomes or this growth form would not be so successful (e.g. Pedersen & Tuomi, 1995).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×