Abberger, T. 2007. Population balance modelling of granulation. Pages 1109–1186 of: Salman, A. D., Hounslow, M. J., and Seville, J. P. K. (eds), Handbook of Powder Technology, vol. 11. Elsevier.Google Scholar

Aiyer, A. K., Yang, D., Chamecki, M., and Meneveau, C. 2019. A population balance model for large eddy simulation of polydisperse droplet evolution. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 878, 700–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akhtar, M. K., Xiong, Y., and Pratsinis, S. E. 1991. Vapor synthesis of titania powder by titanium tetrachloride oxidation. AIChE Journal, 37(10), 1561–1570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akridis, P., and Rigopoulos, S. 2017. Modelling of soot formation in laminar diffusion flames using a comprehensive CFD-PBE model with detailed gas-phase chemistry. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 21(1), 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amsden, A., O’Rourke, P. J., and Butler, T. D. 1989. KIVA-II: A computer program for chemically reactive flows with sprays. Tech. rept. LA-11560-MS. Los Alamos National Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angerhöfer, A. 1994. Untersuchungen zur Kinetik der Fällungskristallisation von Bariumsulfat. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Univetsität München.Google Scholar

Appel, J., Bockhorn, H., and Frenklach, M. 2000. Kinetic modeling of soot formation with detailed chemistry and physics: laminar premixed flames of C₂ hydrocarbons. Combustion and Flame, 121(1–2), 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Attili, A., and Bisetti, F. 2013. Application of a robust and efficient Lagrangian particle scheme to soot transport in turbulent flames. Computers and Fluids, 84, 164–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, L., Shoji, K., Bhatia, V., Jindal, V., Savage, K., and Klimpel, R. 1976. Some results on the description of size reduction as a rate process in various mills. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 15(1), 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balachandar, S., and Eaton, J. K. 2010. Turbulent dispersed multiphase flow. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 42, 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bałdyga, J. 2016. Mixing and fluid dynamics effects in particle precipitation processes. KONA Powder and Particle Journal, 2016(33), 127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bałdyga, J., and Bourne, J. R. 1984. A fluid mechanical approach to turbulent mixing and chemical reaction – Part II: micromixing in the light of turbulence theory. Chemical Engineering Communications, 28(4–6), 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bałdyga, J., and Bourne, J. R. 1989. Simplification of micromixing calculations. I. Derivation and application of new model. The Chemical Engineering Journal, 42(2), 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bałdyga, J., and Bourne, J. R. 1999. Turbulent Mixing and Chemical Reactions. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Bałdyga, J., and Orciuch, W. 1997. Closure problem for precipitation. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 75(2), 160–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bałdyga, J., and Orciuch, W. 2001. Barium sulphate precipitation in a pipe – an experimental study and CFD modelling. Chemical Engineering Science, 56(7), 2435–2444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bałdyga, J., Jasińska, M., and Orciuch, W. 2003. Barium sulphate agglomeration in a pipe – an experimental study and CFD modeling. Chemical Engineering and Technology, 26(3), 334–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bałdyga, J., Makowski, Ł., and Orciuch, W. 2007. Double-feed semibatch precipitation: effects of mixing. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 85(A5), 745–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, R. C., and Jullien, R. 1984. Finite size effects in cluster-cluster aggregation. Journal de Physique Lettres, 45(21), 1031–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balthasar, M., and Frenklach, M. 2005a. Detailed kinetic modeling of soot aggregate formation in laminar premixed flames. Combustion and Flame, 140(1–2), 130–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balthasar, M., and Frenklach, M. 2005b. Monte-Carlo simulation of soot particle coagulation and aggregation: the effect of a realistic size distribution. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 30(1), 1467–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balthasar, M., and Kraft, M. 2003. A stochastic approach to calculate the particle size distribution function of soot particles in laminar premixed flames. Combustion and Flame, 133(3), 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balthasar, M., Mauss, F., Knobel, A., and Kraft, M. 2002. Detailed modeling of soot formation in a partially stirred plug flow reactor. Combustion and Flame, 128(4), 395–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banasiak, J., Lamb, W., and Laurençot, P. 2020a. Analytic Methods for Coagulation-Fragmentation Models. Vol. I. CRC Press.Google Scholar

Banasiak, J., Lamb, W., and Laurençot, P. 2020b. Analytic Methods for Coagulation-Fragmentation Models. Vol. II. CRC Press.Google Scholar

Barrett, J. C., and Jheeta, J. S. 1996. Improving the accuracy of the moments method for solving the aerosol general dynamic equation. Journal of Aerosol Science, 27(8), 1135–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, J. C., and Webb, N. A. 1998. A comparison of some approximate methods for solving the aerosol general dynamic equation. Journal of Aerosol Science, 29(1–2), 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batterham, R. J., Hall, J. S., and Barton, G. 1981. Pelletizing kinetics and simulation of full scale balling circuits. Pages A136–A150 of: 3rd International Symposium on Agglomeration, vol. 1.Google Scholar

Beckett, F. M., Witham, C. S., Leadbetter, S. J., Crocker, R., Webster, H. N., Hort, M. C., Jones, A. R., Devenish, B. J., and Thomson, D. J. 2020. Atmospheric dispersion modelling at the London VAAC: a review of developments since the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull volcano ash cloud. Atmosphere, 11(4), 352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bemrose, C. R., and Bridgwater, J. 1987. A review of attrition and attrition test methods. Powder Technology, 49(2), 97–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergthorson, J. M. 2018. Recyclable metal fuels for clean and compact zero-carbon power. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 68, 169–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernard, P. S., and Wallace, J. M. 2002. Turbulent Flow: Analysis, Measurement, and Prediction. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Berry, E. X. 1967. Cloud droplet growth by collection. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 24, 688–701.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berry, E. X. 1969. A mathematical framework for cloud models. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 26, 109–111.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bini, M., and Jones, W. P. 2007. Particle acceleration in turbulent flows: a class of nonlinear stochastic models for intermittency. Physics of Fluids, 19(3), 035104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bini, M., and Jones, W. P. 2008. Large-eddy simulation of particle-laden turbulent flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 614, 207–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bird, R. B., Stewart, W. E., and Lightfoot, E. N. 1960. Transport Phenomena. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Blanquart, G., and Pitsch, H. 2009. A joint volume-surface-hydrogen multi-variate model for soot formation. Pages 437–463 of: Bockhorn, H., D’Anna, A., Sarofim, A., and Wang, H. (eds), Combustion Generated Fine Carbonaceous Particles. KIT Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar

Blanquart, G., Pepiot-Desjardins, P., and Pitsch, H. 2009. Chemical mechanism for high temperature combustion of engine relevant fuels with emphasis on soot precursors. Combustion and Flame, 156(3), 588–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bleck, R. 1970. A fast, approximative method for integrating the stochastic coalescence equation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 75(27), 5165–5171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonadonna, C., Genco, R., Gouhier, M., Pistolesi, M., Cioni, R., Alfano, F., Hoskuldsson, A., and Ripepe, M. 2011. Tephra sedimentation during the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption (Iceland) from deposit, radar, and satellite observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 116(12), B12202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouaniche, A., Vervisch, L., and Domingo, P. 2019. A hybrid stochastic/fixed-sectional method for solving the population balance equation. Chemical Engineering Science, 209, 115198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouaniche, A., Yon, J., Domingo, P., and Vervisch, L. 2020. Analysis of the soot particle size distribution in a laminar premixed flame: a hybrid stochastic/fixed-sectional approach. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 104(2–3), 753–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourouiba, L. 2020. Turbulent gas clouds and respiratory pathogen emissions: potential implications for reducing transmission of COVID-19. JAMA – Journal of the American Medical Association, 323(18), 1837–1838.Google ScholarPubMed

Bramley, A. S., Hounslow, M. J., and Ryall, R. L. 1996. Aggregation during precipitation from solution: a method for extracting rates from experimental data. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 183(1), 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brasil, A. M., Farias, T. L., and Carvalho, M. G. 1999. A recipe for image characterization of fractal-like aggregates. Journal of Aerosol Science, 30(10), 1379–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brock, J. R. 1972. Condensational growth of atmospheric aerosols. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 39(1), 32–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brock, J. R., and Hidy, G. M. 1965. Collision-rate theory and the coagulation of freemolecule aerosols. Journal of Applied Physics, 36(6), 1857–1862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brookes, S. J., and Moss, J. B. 1999. Predictions of soot and thermal radiation properties in confined turbulent jet diffusion flames. Combustion and Flame, 116(4), 486–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, R. J., Bonadonna, C., and Durant, A. J. 2012. A review of volcanic ash aggregation. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 45–46, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buaria, D., Clay, M. P., Sreenivasan, K. R., and Yeung, P. K. 2021. Small-scale isotropy and ramp-cliff structures in scalar turbulence. Physical Review Letters, 126(3), 034504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buesser, B., and Gröhn, A. J. 2012. Multiscale aspects of modeling gas-phase nanoparticle synthesis. Chemical Engineering and Technology, 35(7), 1133–1143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buesser, B., and Pratsinis, S. E. 2012. Design of nanomaterial synthesis by aerosol processes. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 3, 103–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Calderón, S. M., Tonttila, J., Buchholz, A., Joutsensaari, J., Komppula, M., Leskinen, A., Hao, L., Moisseev, D., Pullinen, I., Tiitta, P., Xu, J., Virtanen, A., Kokkola, H., and Romakkaniemi, S. 2022. Aerosol-stratocumulus interactions: towards a better process understanding using closures between observations and large eddy simulations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22(18), 12417–12441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camenzind, A., Schulz, H., Teleki, A., Beaucage, G., Narayanan, T., and Pratsinis, S. E. 2008. Nanostructure evolution: from aggregated to spherical SiO₂ particles made in diffusion flames. European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 6, 911–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campos, F. B., and Lage, P. L. C. 2003. A numerical method for solving the transient multidimensional population balance equation using an Euler-Lagrange formulation. Chemical Engineering Science, 58(12), 2725–2744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cant, R. S., and Mastorakos, E. 2008. An Introduction to Turbulent Reacting Flows. Imperial College Press.Google Scholar

Chatzopoulos, A. K., and Rigopoulos, S. 2013. A chemistry tabulation approach via ratecontrolled constrained equilibrium (RCCE) and artificial neural networks (ANNs), with application to turbulent non-premixed CH₄/H₂/N₂ flames. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 34(1), 1465–1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, D., and Luo, K. H. 2020. Reactive sites on the surface of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon clusters: a numerical study. Combustion and Flame, 211, 362–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, D., Zainuddin, Z., Yapp, E., Akroyd, J., Mosbach, S., and Kraft, M. 2013. A fully coupled simulation of PAH and soot growth with a population balance model. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 34(1), 1827–1835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, J.-Y. 1997. Stochastic modeling of partially stirred reactors. Combustion Science and Technology, 122(1–6), 63–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cichocki, B. (ed). 2017. Marian Smoluchowski: Selected Scientific Works. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.Google Scholar

Cifuentes, L., Sellmann, J., Wlokas, I., and Kempf, A. 2020. Direct numerical simulations of nanoparticle formation in premixed and non-premixed flame-vortex interactions. Physics of Fluids, 32(9), 093605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clift, R., Grace, J. R., and Weber, M. E. 1978. Bubbles, Drops, and Particles. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Coelho, P. J. 2007. Numerical simulation of the interaction between turbulence and radiation in reactive flows. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 33(4), 311–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coulaloglou, C. A., and Tavlarides, L. L. 1977. Description of interaction processes in agitated liquid-liquid dispersions. Chemical Engineering Science, 32(11), 1289–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crank, J. 1975. The Mathematics of Diffusion. 2nd edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Crowe, C. T., Sommerfeld, M., and Tsuji, Y. 1998. Multiphase Flows with Droplets and Particles. CRC Press.Google Scholar

Curl, R. L. 1963. Dispersed phase mixing: I. Theory and effects in simple reactors. AIChE Journal, 9(2), 175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Anna, A. 2008. Detailed kinetic modeling of particulate formation in rich premixed flames of ethylene. Energy and Fuels, 22(3), 1610–1619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Anna, A. 2009. Combustion-formed nanoparticles. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 32(1), 593–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Anna, A., and Kent, J. H. 2003. Aromatic formation pathways in non-premixed methane flames. Combustion and Flame, 132(4), 715–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Anna, A., and Kent, J. H. 2008. A model of particulate and species formation applied to laminar, nonpremixed flames for three aliphatic-hydrocarbon fuels. Combustion and Flame, 152(4), 573–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Anna, A., Sirignano, M., and Kent, J. 2010. A model of particle nucleation in premixed ethylene flames. Combustion and Flame, 157(11), 2106–2115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, P. A. 2004. Turbulence: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Davies, S. C., King, J. R., and Wattis, J. A. D. 1999. Self-similar behaviour in the coagulation equations. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 36(1–2), 57–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De La Mora, J. F., and Rosner, D. E. 1982. Effects of inertia on the diffusional deposition of small particles to spheres and cylinders at low Reynolds numbers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 125, 379–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Oliveira, P. M., Mesquita, L. C. C., Gkantonas, S., Giusti, A., and Mastorakos, E. 2021. Evolution of spray and aerosol from respiratory releases: theoretical estimates for insight on viral transmission. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 477, 20200584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Derksen, J. J. 2012. Direct simulations of mixing of liquids with density and viscosity differences. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 51(19), 6948–6957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Di Veroli, G., and Rigopoulos, S. 2009. A study of turbulence–chemistry interaction in reactive precipitation via a Population Balance-transported PDF method. In: Hanjalić, K, Nagano, Y, and Jakirlić, S (eds), Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer 6. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer, Rome, Italy. Begell House, Inc.Google Scholar

Di Veroli, G., and Rigopoulos, S. 2010. Modeling of turbulent precipitation: a transported population balance-PDF method. AIChE Journal, 56(4), 878–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Di Veroli, G. Y. 2009. Stochastic modelling of particle formation in turbulent flows via the transported population balance – PDF method. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Manchester.Google Scholar

Di Veroli, G. Y., and Rigopoulos, S. 2011. Modeling of aerosol formation in a turbulent jet with the transported population balance equation-probability density function approach. Physics of Fluids, 23(4), 043305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diemer, R. B., Jr. 2023. Simplifying population balance models to promote broader use in industry. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 190, 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diemer, R. B., and Olson, J. H. 2002. A moment methodology for coagulation and breakage problems: Part 3 – generalized daughter distribution functions. Chemical Engineering Science, 57(19), 4187–4198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ding, T., Readshaw, T., Rigopoulos, S., and Jones, W. P. 2021. Machine learning tabulation of thermochemistry in turbulent combustion: an approach based on hybrid flamelet/random data and multiple multilayer perceptrons. Combustion and Flame, 231, 111493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ding, T., Rigopoulos, S., and Jones, W. P. 2022. Machine learning tabulation of thermochemistry of fuel blends. Applications in Energy and Combustion Science, 12, 100086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobbins, R. A., and Mulholland, G. W. 1984. Interpretation of optical measurements of flame generated particles. Combustion Science and Technology, 40(5–6), 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donde, P., Raman, V., Mueller, M. E., and Pitsch, H. 2013. LES/PDF based modeling of soot-turbulence interactions in turbulent flames. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 34(1), 1183–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donzis, D. A., and Yeung, P. K. 2010. Resolution effects and scaling in numerical simulations of passive scalar mixing in turbulence. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 239(14), 1278–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donzis, D. A., Sreenivasan, K. R., and Yeung, P. K. 2010. The Batchelor spectrum for mixing of passive scalars in isotropic turbulence: submitted for the special issue dedicated to S. B. Pope. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 85(3–4), 549–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donzis, D. A., Aditya, K., Sreenivasan, K. R., and Yeung, P. K. 2014. The turbulent Schmidt number. Journal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 136(6), 060912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dopazo, C. 1994. Recent developments in pdf methods. Pages 375–474 of: Libby, P. A., and Williams, F. A. (eds), Turbulent Reacting Flows. Academic Press London.Google Scholar

Dopazo, C., and O’Brien, E. E. 1974. An approach to the autoignition of a turbulent mixture. Acta Astronautica, 1(9–10), 1239–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drake, R. 1972. A general mathematical survey of the coagulation equation. Pages 201–376 of: Hidy, G. M., and Brock, J. R. (eds), Topics in Current Aerosol Research (Part 2). Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Drew, D. A., and Passman, S. L. 1998. Theory of Multicomponent Fluids, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 135. Springer.Google Scholar

Drossinos, Y., and Housiadas, C. 2017. Aerosols. Pages 1251–1320 of: Michaelides, E. E., Crowe, C. T., and Schwarzkopf, J. D. (eds), Multiphase Flow Handbook, 2nd edn. CRC Press.Google Scholar

Drossinos, Y., and Stilianakis, N. I. 2020. What aerosol physics tells us about airborne pathogen transmission. Aerosol Science and Technology, 54(6), 639–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drossinos, Y., Reid, J. P., Hugentobler, W., and Stilianakis, N. I. 2022. Challenges of integrating aerosol dynamics into SARS-CoV-2 transmission models. Aerosol Science and Technology, 56(9), 777–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Druzhinin, O. A. 1995. On the two-way interaction in two-dimensional particle-laden flows: the accumulation of particles and flow modification. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 297, 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duboc, B., Ribert, G., and Domingo, P. 2019. Hybrid transported-tabulated chemistry for partially premixed combustion. Computers and Fluids, 179, 206–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dukowicz, J. K. 1980. A particle-fluid numerical model for liquid sprays. Journal of Computational Physics, 35(2), 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, S. B., Zhang, Q., Thomson, M. J., Slavinskaya, N. A., and Riedel, U. 2011. Application of an enhanced PAH growth model to soot formation in a laminar coflow ethylene/air diffusion flame. Combustion and Flame, 158(9), 1682–1695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eibeck, A., and Wagner, W. 2000a. Approximative solution of the coagulation-fragmentation equation by stochastic particle systems. Stochastic Analysis and Applications, 18(6), 921–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eibeck, A., and Wagner, W. 2000b. An efficient stochastic algorithm for studying coagulation dynamics and gelation phenomena. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 22(3), 802–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eibeck, A., and Wagner, W. 2001. Stochastic particle approximations for Smoluchoski’s coagulation equation. Annals of Applied Probability, 11(4), 1137–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eibeck, A., and Wagner, W. 2003. Stochastic interacting particle systems and nonlinear kinetic equations. Annals of Applied Probability, 13(3), 845–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Einstein, A. 1926. Investigations on the Theory of the Brownian Movement, Edited by Fürth, R.. Dover Publications, Inc. (1956 republication).Google Scholar

Elimelech, M., Gregory, J., Jia, X., and Williams, R. 1995. Particle Deposition and Aggregation: Measurement, Modelling and Simulation. Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar

Enukashvili, I. M. 1964. On the solution of the kinetic coagulation equation. Izv. Geophys. Ser., 10, 944–948.Google Scholar

Epstein, P. S. 1924. On the resistance experienced by spheres in their motion through gases. Physical Review, 23(6), 710–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ernst, F. O., and Pratsinis, S. E. 2006. Self-preservation and gelation during turbulenceinduced coagulation. Journal of Aerosol Science, 37(2), 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falk, L., and Schaer, E. 2001. A PDF modelling of precipitation reactors. Chemical Engineering Science, 56(7), 2445–2457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Favre, A. 1969. Statistical equations of turbulent gases. Pages 231–266 of: Problems of Hydrodynamics and Continuum Mechanics. SIAM, Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Feroughi, O. M., Deng, L., Kluge, S., Dreier, T., Wiggers, H., Wlokas, I., and Schulz, C. 2017. Experimental and numerical study of a HMDSO-seeded premixed laminar low-pressure flame for SiO₂ nanoparticle synthesis. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 36(1), 1045–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferry, J., and Balachandar, S. 2001. A fast Eulerian method for disperse two-phase flow. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 27(7), 1199–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferziger, J. H., Perić, M., and Street, R. L. 2020. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics. 4th edn. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Filbet, F., and Laurençot, P. 2004. Numerical simulation of the Smoluchowski coagulation equation. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 25(6), 2004–2028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finke, J., and Sewerin, F. 2023. Combining a population balance approach with detailed chemistry to model the condensation of oxide smoke during aluminum combustion in spatially homogeneous reactors. Combustion and Flame, 248, 112510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finlayson, B. A. 2014. The Method of Weighted Residuals and Variational Principles. SIAM, republication of the work first published by Academic Press in 1972.Google Scholar

Fletcher, T. H., Ma, J., Rigby, J. R., Brown, A. L., and Webb, B. W. 1997. Soot in coal combustion systems. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 23(3), 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ford, I. J. 2004. Statistical mechanics of nucleation: a review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 218(8), 883–899.Google Scholar

Fox, R. O. 1998. On the relationship between Lagrangian micromixing models and computational fluid dynamics. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 37(6), 521–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, R. O. 2003. Computational Models for Turbulent Reacting Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, R. O. 2007. Introduction and fundamentals of modeling approaches for polydisperse multiphase flows. Pages 1–40 of: Marchisio, D. L., and Fox, R. O. (eds), Multiphase Reacting Flows: Modelling and Simulation. SpringerWienNewYork.Google Scholar

Franke, L. L. C., Chatzopoulos, A. K., and Rigopoulos, S. 2017. Tabulation of combustion chemistry via Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs): methodology and application to LES-PDF simulation of Sydney flame L. Combustion and Flame, 185, 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fredrickson, A. G., and Tsuchiya, H. M. 1963. Continuous propagation of microorganisms. AIChE Journal, 9(4), 459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fredrickson, A. G., Ramkrishna, D., and Tsuchiya, H. M. 1967. Statistics and dynamics of procaryotic cell populations. Mathematical Biosciences, 1(3), 327–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frenkel, J. 1945. Viscous flow of crystalline bodies under the action of surface tension. Journal of Physics, 9, 385.Google Scholar

Frenklach, M. 1985. Computer modeling of infinite reaction sequences: a chemical lumping. Chemical Engineering Science, 40(10), 1843–1849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frenklach, M. 2002a. Method of moments with interpolative closure. Chemical Engineering Science, 57(12), 2229–2239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frenklach, M. 2002b. Reaction mechanism of soot formation in flames. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 4(11), 2028–2037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frenklach, M., and Harris, S. J. 1987. Aerosol dynamics modeling using the method of moments. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 118(1), 252–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frenklach, M., and Wang, H. 1991. Detailed modeling of soot particle nucleation and growth. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 23(1), 1559–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frenklach, M., and Wang, H. 1994. Detailed mechanism and modeling of soot particle formation. Pages 165–192 of: Bockhorn, H. (ed), Soot Formation in Combustion. Springer Series in Chemical Physics 59. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Frenklach, M. and Wang, H. and Goldenberg, M. and Smith, G. P. and Golden, D. M., and Bowman, C. T., and Hanson, R. K., and Gardiner, W. C., and Lissianski, V. 1995. GRI-MECH: An optimized detailed chemical reaction mechanism for methane combustion. Gas Research Institute Topical Report No. GRI-95/0058.Google Scholar

Friedlander, S. K. 1960. On the particle size spectrum of a condensing vapor. Physics of Fluids, 3(5), 693–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedlander, S. K. 2000. Smoke, Dust, and Haze: Fundamentals of Aerosol Dynamics. 2nd edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Friedlander, S. K., and Wang, C. S. 1966. The self-preserving particle size distribution for coagulation by Brownian motion. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 22(2), 126–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fröhlich, J., and Rodi, W. 2002. Introduction to large eddy simulation of turbulent flows. Pages 267–298 of: Launder, B. E., and Sandham, N. D. (eds), Closure Strategies for Turbulent and Transitional Flows. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Froment, G. F., Bischoff, K. B., and De Wilde, J. 2011. Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design. 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Fuchs, N. A. 1964. The Mechanics of Aerosols. Pergamon, New York.Google Scholar

Fuchs, N. A., and Sutugin, A. G. 1971. High-dispersed aerosols. Pages 1–60 of: Hidy, G. M., and Brock, J. R. (eds), Topics in Current Aerosol Research. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Gany, A., Manheimer-Timnat, Y., and Wolfshtein, M. 1976. Two-phase flow effects on hybrid combustion. Acta Astronautica, 3(3–4), 241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gao, F., and O’Brien, E. E. 1993. A large-eddy simulation scheme for turbulent reacting flows. Physics of Fluids A, 5(6), 1282–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garcia Gonzalez, C. E. 2018. Characterization of nanoparticles generated in reacting flows. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College London.Google Scholar

Gardiner, C. W. 1985. Handbook of Stochastic Methods for Physics, Chemistry and the Natural Sciences. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garmory, A., and Mastorakos, E. 2008. Aerosol nucleation and growth in a turbulent jet using the Stochastic Fields method. Chemical Engineering Science, 63(16), 4078–4089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrick, S. C., and Khakpour, M. 2004. The effects of differential diffusion on nanoparticle coagulation in temporal mixing layers. Aerosol Science and Technology, 38(8), 851–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gavi, E., Marchisio, D. L., and Barresi, A. A. 2007a. CFD modelling and scaleup of Confined Impinging Jet Reactors. Chemical Engineering Science, 62(8), 2228–2241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gavi, E., Rivautella, L., Marchisio, D. L., Vanni, M., Barresi, A. A., and Baldi, G. 2007b. CFD modelling of nano-particle precipitation in confined impinging jet reactors. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 85(5 A), 735–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelbard, F. 1990. Modeling multicomponent aerosol particle growth by vapor condensation. Aerosol Science and Technology, 12(2), 399–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelbard, F., and Seinfeld, J. H. 1978a. Numerical solution of the dynamic equation for particulate systems. Journal of Computational Physics, 28(3), 357–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelbard, F. M., and Seinfeld, J. H. 1978b. Coagulation and growth of a multicomponent aerosol. Journal of Colloid And Interface Science, 63(3), 472–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelbard, F., and Seinfeld, J. H. 1979. The general dynamic equation for aerosols. Theory and application to aerosol formation and growth. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 68(2), 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelbard, F., and Seinfeld, J. H. 1980. Simulation of multicomponent aerosol dynamics. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 78(2), 485–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelbard, F., Tambour, Y., and Seinfeld, J. H. 1980. Sectional representations for simulating aerosol dynamics. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 76(2), 541–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghadiri, M., and Zhang, Z. 2002. Impact attrition of particulate solids. Part 1: a theoretical model of chipping. Chemical Engineering Science, 57(17), 3659–3669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gillespie, D. T. 1975. An exact method for numerically simulating the stochastic coalescence process in a cloud. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 32(10), 1977–1989.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glassman, I. 1988. Soot formation in combustion processes. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 22(1), 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golovin, A. M. 1963. On the spectrum of coagulating cloud droplets, II. Izv. Geophys. Ser., 9, 880–884.Google Scholar

Goodson, M., and Kraft, M. 2002. An efficient stochastic algorithm for simulating nanoparticle dynamics. Journal of Computational Physics, 183(1), 210–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gosman, A. D., and Ioannides, E. 1983. Aspects of computer simulation of liquid-fueled combustors. Journal of Energy, 7(6), 482–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goudeli, E., Eggersdorfer, M. L., and Pratsinis, S. E. 2015. Aggregate characteristics accounting for the evolving fractal-like structure during coagulation and sintering. Journal of Aerosol Science, 89, 58–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gradl, J., and Peukert, W. 2009. Simultaneous 3D observation of different kinetic subprocesses for precipitation in a T-mixer. Chemical Engineering Science, 64(4), 709–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J. B., Silverman, I., and Tambour, Y. 1993. On the origins of spray sectional conservation equations. Combustion and Flame, 93(1–2), 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffiths, P. R., and De Haseth, J. A. 2007. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry. John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimmett, G., and Stirzaker, D. 2001. Probability and Random Processes. 3rd edn. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grinstein, F. F., Margolin, L. G., and Rider, W. J. 2007. Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: Computing Turbulent Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grosshandler, W. L. 1993. RADCAL: A narrow-band model for radiation calculations in a combustion environment. NIST Technical Note 1402. National Institute of Standards and Technology.Google Scholar

Gunawan, R., Fusman, I., and Braatz, R. D. 2004. High resolution algorithms for multidimensional population balance equations. AIChE Journal, 50(11), 2738–2749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guo, H., Liu, F., Smallwood, G. J., and Gülder, Ö. L. 2002. The flame preheating effect on numerical modelling of soot formation in a two-dimensional laminar ethylene-air diffusion flame. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 6(2), 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guo, H., Liu, F., Smallwood, G. J., and Gülder, Ö. L. 2006. Numerical study on the influence of hydrogen addition on soot formation in a laminar ethylene-air diffusion flame. Combustion and Flame, 145(1–2), 324–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gupta, H. C., and Bracco, F. V. 1978. Numerical computations of two-dimensional unsteady sprays for application to engines. AIAA Journal, 16(10), 1053–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, R. J., Smooke, M. D., and Colket, M. B. 1997. Predictions of soot dynamics in opposed jet diffusion flames. Pages 189–229 of: Dryer, F. L., and Sawyer, R. F. (eds), Physical and Chemical Aspects of Combustion: A Tribute to Irvin Glassman. Combustion Science and Technology Book Series, vol. 4. Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar

Hanjalić, K., and Launder, B. 2022. Modelling Turbulence in Engineering and the Environment: Rational Alternative Routes to Closure. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, S. J., and Kennedy, I. M. 1988. The coagulation of soot particles with van der Waals forces. Combustion Science and Technology, 59(4–6), 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, S. J., and Weiner, A. M. 1983a. Surface growth of soot particles in premixed ethylene/air flames. Combustion Science and Technology, 31(3–4), 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, S. J., and Weiner, A. M. 1983b. Determination of the rate constant for soot surface growth. Combustion Science and Technology, 32(5–6), 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, S. J., and Weiner, A. M. 1985. Chemical kinetics of soot particle growth. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, 36, 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haworth, D.C. 2010. Progress in probability density function methods for turbulent reacting flows. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 36(2), 168–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haynes, B. S., and Wagner, H. Gg. 1981. Soot formation. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 7(4), 229–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, M. T. 2002. Scientific Computing: An Introductory Survey. 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Hidy, G. M. 1965. On the theory of the coagulation of noninteracting particles in Brownian motion. Journal of Colloid Science, 20(2), 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hidy, G. M., and Brock, J. R. 1970. The Dynamics of Aerocolloidal Systems. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Hill, P. J., and Ng, K. M. 1995. New discretization procedure for the breakage equation. AIChE Journal, 41(5), 1204–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, P. J., and Ng, K. M. 1996a. New discretization procedure for the agglomeration equation. AIChE Journal, 42(3), 727–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, P. J., and Ng, K. M. 1996b. Statistics of multiple particle breakage. AIChE Journal, 42(6), 1600–1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsch, C. 2007. Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows: Volume 1, Fundamentals of Computational Fluid Dynamics. 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar

Hirschfelder, J. O., Curtiss, C. F., and Bird, R. B. 1964. Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Hjertager, B. H. 2007. Multi-fluid CFD analysis of chemical reactors. Pages 125–179 of: Marchisio, D. L., and Fox, R. O. (eds), Multiphase Reacting Flows: Modelling and Simulation. SpringerWienNewYork.Google Scholar

Hjortsø, M. A. 2004. Population Balances in Biomedical Engineering: Segregation Through the Distribution of Cell States. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Hounslow, M. J. 1990. Nucleation, growth, and aggregation rates from steady-state experimental data. AIChE Journal, 36(11), 1748–1752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hounslow, M. J. 1998. The population balance as a tool for understanding particle rate processes. KONA Powder and Particle Journal, 16(May), 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hounslow, M. J., Ryall, R. L., and Marshall, V. R. 1988. A discretized population balance for nucleation, growth, and aggregation. AIChE Journal, 34(11), 1821–1832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hulburt, H. M., and Akiyama, T. 1969. Liouville equations for agglomeration and dispersion processes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 8(2), 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hulburt, H. M., and Katz, S. 1964. Some problems in particle technology. A statistical mechanical formulation. Chemical Engineering Science, 19(8), 555–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Workshop, ISF. 2018. ‘Accessed on 01/04/2024’ www.adelaide.edu.au/cet/isfworkshop/.Google Scholar

Ishii, M., and Hibiki, T. 2005. Thermo-fluid Dynamics of Two-Phase Flow. Springer.Google Scholar

Iyer, S. S., Litzinger, T. A., Lee, S.-Y., and Santoro, R. J. 2007. Determination of soot scattering coefficient from extinction and three-angle scattering in a laminar diffusion flame. Combustion and Flame, 149(1–2), 206–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jain, A., and Xuan, Y. 2019. Effects of large aromatic precursors on soot formation in turbulent non-premixed sooting jet flames. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 23(3), 439–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakobsen, H. A. 2014. Chemical Reactor Modeling: Multiphase Reactive Flows. 2nd edn. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakobsen, H. A., Lindborg, H., and Dorao, C. A. 2005. Modeling of bubble column reactors: progress and limitations. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 44(14), 5107–5151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, D. E. 1974. Prediction of soot formation rates: a new approach. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 338, 375–396.Google Scholar

Jeong, J. I., and Choi, M. 2001. A sectional method for the analysis of growth of polydisperse non-spherical particles undergoing coagulation and coalescence. Journal of Aerosol Science, 32(5), 565–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, W. P. 2002. The joint scalar probability density function method. Pages 582–625 of: Launder, B. E., and Sandham, N. D. (eds), Closure Strategies for Turbulent and Transitional Flows. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, W. P., and Launder, B. E. 1972. The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 15(2), 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, W. P., and Navarro-Martinez, S. 2007. Large eddy simulation of autoignition with a subgrid probability density function method. Combustion and Flame, 150(3), 170–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, W. P., and Prasad, V. N. 2010. Large eddy simulation of the Sandia flame series (D-F) using the Eulerian stochastic field method. Combustion and Flame, 157(9), 1621–1636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, W. P., and Sheen, D.-H. 2000. Probability density function method for modelling liquid fuel sprays. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 63(1), 379–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, W. P., di Mare, F., and Marquis, A. J. 2002. LES-BOFFIN: User’s Guide.Google Scholar

Kammler, H. K., Pratsinis, S. E., MorrisonJr., P. W., and Hemmerling, B. 2002. Flame temperature measurements during electrically assisted aerosol synthesis of nanoparticles. Combustion and Flame, 128(4), 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, C. R., and Gentry, J. W. 1988. Agglomeration of chain-like combustion aerosols due to Brownian motion. Aerosol Science and Technology, 8(1), 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kazakov, A., and Frenklach, M. 1998. Dynamic modeling of soot particle coagulation and aggregation: implementation with the method of moments and application to high-pressure laminar premixed flames. Combustion and Flame, 114(3–4), 484–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kearney, S. P., Guildenbecher, D. R., Winters, C., Farias, P. A., Grasser, T. W., and Hewson, J. C. 2015. Temperature, oxygen, and soot-volume-fraction measurements in a turbulent C₂H₄-fueled jet flame. Tech. rept. SAND2015-7968. Sandia National Laboratories.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kee, R. J., Coltrin, M. E., and Glarborg, P. 2003. Chemically Reacting Flow: Theory and Practice. 1st edn. Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelesidis, G. A., and Pratsinis, S. E. 2021. Determination of the volume fraction of soot accounting for its composition and morphology. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 38(1), 1189–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelesidis, G. A., Goudeli, E., and Pratsinis, S. E. 2017. Flame synthesis of functional nanostructured materials and devices: surface growth and aggregation. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 36(1), 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendall, D. G. 1950. An artificial realization of a simple ‘birth-and-death’ process. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B: (Methodological), 12(1), 116–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, I. M. 1990. Enhancement of silica aerosol coagulation by Van der Waals forces. Aerosol Science and Technology, 12(4), 869–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, I. M. 1997. Models of soot formation and oxidation. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 23(2), 95–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, I. M., Yam, C., Rapp, D. C., and Santoro, R. J. 1996. Modeling and measurements of soot and species in a laminar diffusion flame. Combustion and Flame, 107(4), 368–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kholghy, M. R., Veshkini, A., and Thomson, M. J. 2016. The core-shell internal nanostructure of soot – a criterion to model soot maturity. Carbon, 100, 508–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khosousi, A., and Dworkin, S. B. 2015. Soot surface reactivity during surface growth and oxidation in laminar diffusion flames. Combustion and Flame, 162(12), 4523–4532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, Y. P., and Seinfeld, J. H. 1990. Simulation of multicomponent aerosol condensation by the moving sectional method. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 135(1), 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiparissides, C. 2006. Challenges in particulate polymerization reactor modeling and optimization: a population balance perspective. Journal of Process Control, 16(3), 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kittelson, D. B. 1998. Engines and nanoparticles: a review. Journal of Aerosol Science, 29(5–6), 575–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kloeden, P. E., and Platen, E. 1992. Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kobata, A., Kusakabe, K., and Morooka, S. 1991. Growth and transformation of TiO₂ crystallites in aerosol reactor. AIChE Journal, 37(3), 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koch, W., and Friedlander, S. K. 1990. The effect of particle coalescence on the surface area of a coagulating aerosol. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 140(2), 419–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kodas, T. T., and Hampden-Smith, M. J. 1999. Aerosol Processing of Materials. Wiley-VCH.Google Scholar

Kollmann, W. 1990. The pdf approach to turbulent flow. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 1(5), 249–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kollmann, W. 1995. Probability Density Function (PDF) closures for scalar transport in turbulent flows. Pages 621–654 of: Habashi, W. G., and Hafez, M. M. (eds), Computational Fluid Dynamics Techniques. Gordon and Breach Publishers.Google Scholar

Kollmann, W., Kennedy, I. M., Metternich, M., and Chen, J.-Y. 1994. Application of a soot model to a turbulent ethylene di usion flame. Pages 503–526 of: Bockhorn, H. (ed), Soot Formation in Combustion. Springer Series in Chemical Physics 59. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Koren, B. 1993. A robust upwind discretization method for advection, diffusion and source terms. Pages 117–138 of: Vreugdenhil, C. B., and Koren, B. (eds), Numerical Methods for Advection-Diffusion Problems. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, vol. 45. Vieweg Verlag.Google Scholar

Kostoglou, M. 2007a. Extended cell average technique for the solution of coagulation equation. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 306(1), 72–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kostoglou, M. 2007b. The linear breakage equation: from fundamental issues to numerical solution techniques. Pages 793–835 of: Williams, J. C., Allen, T., Salman, A. D., Ghadiri, M., and Hounslow, M. J. (eds), Handbook of Powder Technology, Volume 12: Particle Breakage. Elsevier.Google Scholar

Kostoglou, M., and Karabelas, A. J. 1994. Evaluation of zero order methods for simulating particle coagulation. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 163(2), 420–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kostoglou, M., and Karabelas, A. J. 1995. Evaluation of numerical methods for simulating an evolving particle size distribution in growth processes. Chemical Engineering Communications, 136(1), 177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kostoglou, M., and Karabelas, A. J. 2001. On the breakage problem with a homogeneous erosion type kernel. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 34(8), 1725–1740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kostoglou, M., and Karabelas, A. J. 2004. Optimal low order methods of moments for solving the fragmentation equation. Powder Technology, 143–144, 280–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kostoglou, M., and Karabelas, A. J. 2005. Toward a unified framework for the derivation of breakage functions based on the statistical theory of turbulence. Chemical Engineering Science, 60(23), 6584–6595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kostoglou, M., and Konstandopoulos, A. G. 2001. Evolution of aggregate size and fractal dimension during Brownian coagulation. Journal of Aerosol Science, 32(12), 1399–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kostoglou, M., Dovas, S., and Karabelas, A. J. 1997. On the steady-state size distribution of dispersions in breakage processes. Chemical Engineering Science, 52(8), 1285–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kostoglou, M., Konstandopoulos, A. G., and Friedlander, S. K. 2006. Bivariate population dynamics simulation of fractal aerosol aggregate coagulation and restructuring. Journal of Aerosol Science, 37(9), 1102–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kotalczyk, G., and Kruis, F. E. 2020. Compartmental population balances by means of Monte Carlo methods. Page 519–548 of: Heinrich, S. (ed), Dynamic Flowsheet Simulation of Solids Processes. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.Google Scholar

Köylü, Ü. Ö., McEnally, C. S., Rosner, D. E., and Pfefferle, L. D. 1997. Simultaneous measurements of soot volume fraction and particle size / microstructure in flames using a thermophoretic sampling technique. Combustion and Flame, 110(4), 494–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreyling, W. G., Semmler-Behnke, M., and Möller, W. 2006. Ultrafine particle – lung interactions: does size matter? Journal of Aerosol Medicine, 19(1), 74–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kronenburg, A., Bilger, R. W., and Kent, J. H. 2000. Modeling soot formation in turbulent methane-air jet diffusion flames. Combustion and Flame, 121(1–2), 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruis, F. E., and Kusters, K. A. 1997. The collision rate of particles in turbulent flow. Chemical Engineering Communications, 158, 201–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruis, F. E., Kusters, K. A., and Pratsinis, S. E. 1993. A simple model for the evolution of the characteristics of aggregate particles undergoing coagulation and sintering. Aerosol Science and Technology, 19(4), 514–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruis, F. E., Fissan, H., and Peled, A. 1998. Synthesis of nanoparticles in the gas phase for electronic, optical and magnetic applications – a review. Journal of Aerosol Science, 29(5–6), 511–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruis, F. E., Maisels, A., and Fissan, H. 2000. Direct simulation Monte Carlo method for particle coagulation and aggregation. AIChE Journal, 46(9), 1735–1742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kucher, M., Babic, D., and Kind, M. 2006. Precipitation of barium sulfate: experimental investigation about the influence of supersaturation and free lattice ion ratio on particle formation. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 45(10), 900–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kumar, J., Peglow, M., Warnecke, G., Heinrich, S., and Mörl, L. 2006. Improved accuracy and convergence of discretized population balance for aggregation: the cell average technique. Chemical Engineering Science, 61(10), 3327–3342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kumar, S., and Ramkrishna, D. 1996a. On the solution of population balance equations by discretization – I. A fixed pivot technique. Chemical Engineering Science, 51(8), 1311–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kumar, S., and Ramkrishna, D. 1996b. On the solution of population balance equations by discretization – II. A moving pivot technique. Chemical Engineering Science, 51(8), 1333–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kumar, S., and Ramkrishna, D. 1997. On the solution of population balance equations by discretization – III. Nucleation, growth and aggregation of particles. Chemical Engineering Science, 52(24), 4659–4679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lage, P. L. C. 2002. Comments on the ‘An analytical solution to the population balance equation with coalescence and breakage – the special case with constant number of particles’ by D.P. Patil and J.R.G. Andrews [Chemical Engineering Science 53(3) 599–601]. Chemical Engineering Science, 57(19), 4253–4254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lai, F. S., Friedlander, S. K., Pich, J., and Hidy, G. M. 1972. The self-preserving particle size distribution for Brownian coagulation in the free-molecule regime. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 39(2), 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landgrebe, J. D., and Pratsinis, S. E. 1989. Gas-phase manufacture of particulates: interplay of chemical reaction and aerosol coagulation in the free-molecular regime. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 28(10), 1474–1481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landgrebe, J. D., and Pratsinis, S. E. 1990. A discrete-sectional model for particulate production by gas-phase chemical reaction and aerosol coagulation in the free-molecular regime. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 139(1), 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laurent, F., and Massot, M. 2001. Multi-fluid modelling of laminar polydisperse spray flames: origin, assumptions and comparison of sectional and sampling methods. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 5(4), 537–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, G., Meyer, X. M., Biscans, B., Le Lann, J. M., and Yoon, E. S. 1999. Adaptive finite difference method for the simulation of batch crystallization. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 23(SUPPL. 1), S363–S366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, G., Yoon, E. S., Lim, Y.-I., Le Lann, J. M., Meyer, X.-M., and Joulia, X. 2001. Adaptive mesh method for the simulation of crystallization processes including agglomeration and breakage: the potassium sulfate system. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 40(26), 6228–6235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, J. 2011. Estimation of emission properties for silica particles using thermal radiation spectroscopy. Applied Optics, 50(22), 4262–4267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lee, K. B., Thring, M. W., and Beér, J. M. 1962. On the rate of combustion of soot in a laminar soot flame. Combustion and Flame, 6(C), 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, K. W. 1983. Change of particle size distribution during Brownian coagulation. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 92(2), 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, K. W., and Chen, H. 1984. Coagulation rate of polydisperse particles. Aerosol Science and Technology, 3(3), 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, K. W., Chen, H., and Gieseke, J. A. 1984. Log-normally preserving size distribution for Brownian coagulation in the free-molecule regime. Aerosol Science and Technology, 3(1), 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, M. H. 2000. On the validity of the coagulation equation and the nature of runaway growth. Icarus, 143(1), 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leer, M., Pettit, M. W. A., Lipkowicz, J. T., Domingo, P., Vervisch, L., and Kempf, A. M. 2022. A conservative Eulerian-Lagrangian decomposition principle for the solution of multi-scale flow problems at high Schmidt or Prandtl numbers. Journal of Computational Physics, 464, 111216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lemons, D. S., and Gythiel, A. 1997. Paul Langevin’s 1908 paper ‘on the theory of Brownian motion’ [‘Sur la théorie du mouvement brownien,’ C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 146, 530–533 (1908)]. American Journal of Physics, 65(11), 1079–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leschziner, M. 2016. Statistical Turbulence Modelling for Fluid Dynamics – Demystified: An Introductory Text for Graduate Engineering Students. Imperial College Press.Google Scholar

Leung, K. M., Lindstedt, R. P., and Jones, W. P. 1991. A simplified reaction mechanism for soot formation in nonpremixed flames. Combustion and Flame, 87(3–4), 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leveque, R. J. 2002. Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, A., Seckler, M., Kramer, H., and van Rosmalen, G. 2015. Industrial Crystallization: Fundamentals and Applications. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liao, Y., and Lucas, D. 2009. A literature review of theoretical models for drop and bubble breakup in turbulent dispersions. Chemical Engineering Science, 64(15), 3389–3406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Libby, P. A., and Williams, F. A. 1980. Fundamental aspects. Pages 1–43 of: Libby, P. A., and Williams, F. A. (eds), Topics in Applied Physics, Volume 44: Turbulent Reacting Flows. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Lifshitz, I. M., and Slyozov, V. V. 1961. The kinetics of precipitation from supersaturated solid solutions. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 19(1–2), 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindstedt, R. P., and Louloudi, S. A. 2005. Joint-scalar transported PDF modeling of soot formation and oxidation. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 30(1), 775–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Link, O., Snelling, D. R., Thomson, K. A., and Smallwood, G. J. 2011. Development of absolute intensity multi-angle light scattering for the determination of polydisperse soot aggregate properties. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 33(1), 847–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Litster, J. 2016. Design and Processing of Particulate Products. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Litster, J., and Ennis, B. 2004. The Science and Engineering of Granulation Processes. Springer-Science+Business Media, B.V.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Litster, J. D., Smit, D. J., and Hounslow, M. J. 1995. Adjustable discretized population balance for growth and aggregation. AIChE Journal, 41(3), 591–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, A., and Rigopoulos, S. 2019. A conservative method for numerical solution of the population balance equation, and application to soot formation. Combustion and Flame, 205, 506–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, A., Garcia, C. E., Sewerin, F., Williams, B. A. O., and Rigopoulos, S. 2020. Population balance modelling and laser diagnostic validation of soot particle evolution in laminar ethylene diffusion flames. Combustion and Flame, 221, 384–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, F., Guo, H., Smallwood, G. J., and Gülder, Ö. L. 2003. Numerical modelling of soot formation and oxidation in laminar coflow non-smoking and smoking ethylene diffusion flames. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 7(2), 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lombart, M., and Laibe, G. 2021. Grain growth for astrophysics with discontinuous Galerkin schemes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 501(3), 4298–4316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucchesi, M., Abdelgadir, A., Attili, A., and Bisetti, F. 2017. Simulation and analysis of the soot particle size distribution in a turbulent nonpremixed flame. Combustion and Flame, 178, 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lundgren, T. S. 1967. Distribution functions in the statistical theory of turbulence. Physics of Fluids, 10(5), 969–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ma, D. L., Tafti, D. K., and Braatz, R. D. 2002. High-resolution simulation of multidimensional crystal growth. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 41(25), 6217–6223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahoney, A. W., and Ramkrishna, D. 2002. Efficient solution of population balance equations with discontinuities by finite elements. Chemical Engineering Science, 57(7), 1107–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansurov, Z. A. 2005. Soot formation in combustion processes (review). Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves, 41(6), 727–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantzaris, N. V., Daoutidis, P., and Srienc, F. 2001a. Numerical solution of multivariable cell population balance models: I. Finite difference methods. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 25(11–12), 1411–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantzaris, N. V., Daoutidis, P., and Srienc, F. 2001b. Numerical solution of multi-variable cell population balance models. II. Spectral methods. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 25(11–12), 1441–1462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantzaris, N. V., Daoutidis, P., and Srienc, F. 2001c. Numerical solution of multivariable cell population balance models. III. Finite element methods. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 25(11–12), 1463–1481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marchal, C. 2008. Soot formation and oxidation modelling in an automotive engine. Ph.D. thesis, Université d’Orléans.Google Scholar

Marchal, P., David, R., Klein, J. P., and Villermaux, J. 1988. Crystallization and precipitation engineering – I. An efficient method for solving population balance in crystallization with agglomeration. Chemical Engineering Science, 43(1), 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marchisio, D. L., and Fox, R. O. 2005. Solution of population balance equations using the direct quadrature method of moments. Journal of Aerosol Science, 36(1), 43–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marchisio, D. L., and Fox, R. O. 2013. Computational Models for Polydisperse Particulate and Multiphase Systems. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marchisio, D. L., Fox, R. O., Barresi, A. A., and Baldi, G. 2001a. On the comparison between presumed and full PDF methods for turbulent precipitation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 40(23), 5132–5139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marchisio, D. L., Fox, R. O., Barresi, A. A., Garbero, M., and Baldi, G. 2001b. On the simulation of turbulent precipitation in a tubular reactor via computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 79(8), 998–1004.Google Scholar

Marchisio, D. L., Barresi, A. A., and Fox, R. O. 2001c. Simulation of turbulent precipitation in a semi-batch Taylor-Couette reactor using CFD. AIChE Journal, 47(3), 664–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marchisio, D. L., Vigil, R. D., and Fox, R. O. 2003. Quadrature method of moments for aggregation-breakage processes. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 258(2), 322–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marchisio, D. L., Rivautella, L., and Barresi, A. A. 2006. Design and scale-up of chemical reactors for nanoparticle precipitation. AIChE Journal, 52(5), 1877–1887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marinov, N. M., Pitz, W. J., Westbrook, C. K., Castaldi, M. J., and Senkan, S. M. 1996. Modeling of aromatic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon formation in premixed methane and ethane flames. Combustion Science and Technology, 116–117(1–6), 211–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martynov, G. A., and Bakanov, S. P. 1961. Solution of the kinetic equation for coagulation. Pages 182–190 of: Derjaguin, B. (ed), Surface Forces.Google Scholar

Mashayek, F., and Pandya, R. V. R. 2003. Analytical description of particle/droplet-laden turbulent flows. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 29(4), 329–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Massot, M. 2007. Eulerian multi-fluid models for polydisperse evaporating sprays. Pages 79–123 of: Marchisio, D. L., and Fox, R. O. (eds), Multiphase Reacting Flows: Modelling and Simulation. SpringerWienNewYork.Google Scholar

Mathieu, J., and Scott, J. 2000. An Introduction to Turbulent Flow. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsoukas, T., and Friedlander, S. K. 1991. Dynamics of aerosol agglomerate formation. Journal of Colloid And Interface Science, 146(2), 495–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maxey, M. R. 1987. The gravitational settling of aerosol particles in homogeneous turbulence and random flow fields. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 174, 441–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maxey, M. R., and Riley, J. J. 1983. Equation of motion for a small rigid sphere in a nonuniform flow. Physics of Fluids, 26(4), 883–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDermott, R., and Pope, S. B. 2007. A particle formulation for treating differential diffusion in filtered density function methods. Journal of Computational Physics, 226(1), 947–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McEnally, C. S., Pfefferle, L. D., Atakan, B., and Kohse-Höinghaus, K. 2006. Studies of aromatic hydrocarbon formation mechanisms in flames: progress towards closing the fuel gap. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 32(3), 247–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGrady, E. D., and Ziff, R. M. 1987. ‘Shattering’ transition in fragmentation. Physical Review Letters, 58(9), 892–895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McGrady, E. D., and Ziff, R. M. 1988. Analytical solutions to fragmentation equations with flow. AIChE Journal, 34(12), 2073–2076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGraw, R. 1997. Description of aerosol dynamics by the quadrature method of moments. Aerosol Science and Technology, 27(2), 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLeod, J. B. 1962. On an infinite set of non-linear differential equations. Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, 13(1), 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Megaridis, C. M., and Dobbins, R. A. 1989. Comparison of soot growth and oxidation in smoking and non-smoking ethylene diffusion flames. Combustion Science and Technology, 66(1–3), 1–16.Google Scholar

Meierhofer, F., and Fritsching, U. 2021. Synthesis of metal oxide nanoparticles in flame sprays: review on process technology, modeling, and diagnostics. Energy and Fuels, 35(7), 5495–5537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Melzak, Z. A. 1957a. A scalar transport equation. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 85(2), 547–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Melzak, Z. A. 1957b. A scalar transport equation, II. Michigan Mathematical Journal, 4(3), 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menz, W. J., Akroyd, J., and Kraft, M. 2014. Stochastic solution of population balance equations for reactor networks. Journal of Computational Physics, 256, 615–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mersmann, A. (ed). 2001. Crystallization Technology Handbook. 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker. Metzger, L., and Kind, M. 2017. The influence of mixing on fast precipitation processes – a coupled 3D CFD-PBE approach using the direct quadrature method of moments (DQMOM). Chemical Engineering Science, 169, 284–298.Google Scholar

Michaelides, E. E. 2003. Hydrodynamic force and heat/mass transfer from particles, bubbles, and drops – the Freeman Scholar Lecture. Journal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 125(2), 209–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michaelides, E. E., and Feng, Z.-G. 2017. Fundamentals of multiphase flow. Pages 1–78 of: Michaelides, E. E., Crowe, C. T., and Schwarzkopf, J. D. (eds), Multiphase Flow Handbook. 2nd edn. CRC Press.Google Scholar

Michelsen, H. A., Colket, M. B., Bengtsson, P.-E., D’Anna, A., Desgroux, P., Haynes, B. S., Miller, J. H., Nathan, G. J., Pitsch, H., and Wang, H. 2020. A review of terminology used to describe soot formation and evolution under combustion and pyrolytic conditions. ACS Nano, 14(10), 12470–12490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mitchell, P., and Frenklach, M. 1998. Monte Carlo simulation of soot aggregation with simultaneous surface growth – why primary particles appear spherical. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 27(1), 1507–1514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, P., and Frenklach, M. 2003. Particle aggregation with simultaneous surface growth. Physical Review E – Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics, 67(6), 061407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Modest, M. F., and Mazumder, S. 2022. Radiative Heat Transfer. 4th edn. Academic Press. Moin, P., and Mahesh, K. 1998. Direct numerical simulation: a tool in turbulence research. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 30, 539–578.Google Scholar

Monnin, C. 1999. A thermodynamic model for the solubility of barite and celestite in electrolyte solutions and seawater to 200^◦C and to 1 kbar. Chemical Geology, 153(1–4), 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MorrisonJr., P. W., Raghavan, R., Timpone, A. J., Artelt, C. P., and Pratsinis, S. E. 1997. In situ Fourier transform infrared characterization of the effect of electrical fields on the flame synthesis of TiO₂ particles. Chemistry of Materials, 9(12), 2702–2708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mueller, M. E., Blanquart, G., and Pitsch, H. 2009a. Hybrid method of moments for modeling soot formation and growth. Combustion and Flame, 156(6), 1143–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mueller, M. E., Blanquart, G., and Pitsch, H. 2009b. A joint volume-surface model of soot aggregation with the method of moments. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 32(1), 785–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mühlenweg, H., Gutsch, A., Schild, A., and Pratsinis, S. E. 2002. Process simulation of gasto-particle-synthesis via population balances: investigation of three models. Chemical Engineering Science, 57(12), 2305–2322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, H. 1928. Zur allgemeinen Theorie ser raschen Koagulation. Kolloidchemische Beihefte, 27, 223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mullin, J. W. 2001. Crystallization. 4th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar

Mustata, R., Valiño, L., Jiménez, C., Jones, W. P., and Bondi, S. 2006. A probability density function Eulerian Monte Carlo field method for large eddy simulations: application to a turbulent piloted methane/air diffusion flame (Sandia D). Combustion and Flame, 145(1–2), 88–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myerson, A. S., Erdemir, D., and Lee, A. Y. (eds). 2019. Handbook of Industrial Crystallization. 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagle, J., and Strickland-Constable, R. F. 1962. Oxidation of carbon between 1000-2000^◦C. Pages 154–164 of: Proceedings of the Fifth Carbon Conference, vol. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Narsimhan, G., Gupta, J. P., and Ramkrishna, D. 1979. A model for transitional break-age probability of droplets in agitated lean liquid-liquid dispersions. Chemical Engineering Science, 34(2), 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neoh, K. G., Howard, J. B., and Sarofim, A. F. 1985. Effect of oxidation on the physical structure of soot. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 20(1), 951–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neuber, G., Kronenburg, A., Stein, O. T., and Cleary, M. J. 2017. MMC-LES modelling of droplet nucleation and growth in turbulent jets. Chemical Engineering Science, 167, 204–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicmanis, M., and Hounslow, M. J. 1998. Finite-element methods for steady-state population balance equations. AIChE Journal, 44(10), 2258–2272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Brien, E. E. 1980. The probability density function (pdf) approach to reacting turbulent flows. Pages 185–218 of: Libby, P. A., and Williams, F. A. (eds), Topics in Applied Physics, Volume 44: Turbulent Reacting Flows. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Olivieri, D. A., Fairweather, M., and Falle, S. A. E. G. 2009. An adaptive mesh refinement method for solution of the transported PDF equation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 79(12), 1536–1556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oseen, C. W. 1910. Über die Stokes’sche Formel und über eine verwandte Aufgabe in der Hydrodynamik. Arkiv för Matematik, Astronomi och Fysik, 6(29).Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, D., and Rigopoulos, S. 2022. A conservative finite volume method for the population balance equation with aggregation, fragmentation, nucleation and growth. Chemical Engineering Science, 263, 117925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Papoulis, A. 1991. Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes. 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar

Park, S. H., and Rogak, S. N. 2003. A one-dimensional model for coagulation, sintering, and surface growth of aerosol agglomerates. Aerosol Science and Technology, 37(12), 947–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Park, S. H., and Rogak, S. N. 2004. A novel fixed-sectional model for the formation and growth of aerosol agglomerates. Journal of Aerosol Science, 35(11), 1385–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Park, S. H., Rogak, S. N., Bushe, W. K., Wen, J. Z., and Thomson, M. J. 2005. An aerosol model to predict size and structure of soot particles. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 9(3), 499–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Partheniades, E. 2009. Cohesive Sediments in Open Channels. Elsevier Inc.Google Scholar

Patil, D. P., and Andrews, J. R. G. 1998. An analytical solution to continuous population balance model describing floc coalescence and breakage – a special case. Chemical Engineering Science, 53(3), 599–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patruno, L. E., Dorao, C. A., Svendsen, H. F., and Jakobsen, H. A. 2009. Analysis of breakage kernels for population balance modelling. Chemical Engineering Science, 64(3), 501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, R. I. A., and Kraft, M. 2007. Models for the aggregate structure of soot particles. Combustion and Flame, 151(1–2), 160–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pavliotis, G. A. 2014. Stochastic Processes and Applications: Diffusion Processes, the Fokker-Planck and Langevin Equations. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peirano, E., Chibbaro, S., Pozorski, J., and Minier, J.-P. 2006. Mean-field/PDF numerical approach for polydispersed turbulent two-phase flows. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 32(3), 315–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pesmazoglou, I., Kempf, A. M., and Navarro-Martinez, S. 2014. Aerosol nucleation in a turbulent jet using Large Eddy Simulations. Chemical Engineering Science, 116, 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pesmazoglou, I., Kempf, A. M., and Navarro-Martinez, S. 2017. Large eddy simulation of particle aggregation in turbulent jets. Journal of Aerosol Science, 111, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, N. 2000. Turbulent Combustion. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peterson, T. W., Gelbard, F., and Seinfeld, J. H. 1978. Dynamics of source-reinforced, coagulating, and condensing aerosols. Journal of Colloid And Interface Science, 63(3), 426–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pilou, M., Tsangaris, S., Neofytou, P., Housiadas, C., and Drossinos, Y. 2011. Inertial particle deposition in a 90^◦ laminar flow bend: an Eulerian fluid particle approach. Aerosol Science and Technology, 45(11), 1376–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piomelli, U., and Chasnov, J. R. 1996. Large eddy simulations: theory and applications. Pages 269–336 of: Hallbäck, M., Henningson, D. S., Johansson, A.V., and Alfredsson, P. H. (eds), ERCOFTAC Series: Turbulence and Transition Modelling. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Piton, D., Fox, R. O., and Marcant, B. 2000. Simulation of fine particle formation by precipitation using computational fluid dynamics. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 78(5), 983–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poinsot, T., and Veynante, D. 2005. Theoretical and Numerical Combustion. 2nd edn. Edwards.Google Scholar

Pope, S. B. 1976. The probability approach to the modelling of turbulent reacting flows. Combustion and Flame, 27(C), 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pope, S. B. 1981. A Monte Carlo method for the PDF equations of turbulent reactive flow. Combustion Science and Technology, 25(5–6), 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pope, S. B. 1985. PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 11(2), 119–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pope, S. B. 1991. Mapping closures for turbulent mixing and reaction. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2(5–6), 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pope, S. B. 1997. Computationally efficient implementation of combustion chemistry using in situ adaptive tabulation. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 1(1), 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar