Conflict in headquarters–subsidiary relations: a critical literature review and new directions

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511973352.006

5 - Conflict in headquarters–subsidiary relations: a critical literature review and new directions

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 April 2011

Susanne Blazejewski and

Florian Becker-Ritterspach

Edited by

Christoph Dörrenbächer and

Mike Geppert

Show author details

Susanne Blazejewski: Affiliation:
Alanus University of Arts and Social Sciences, Germany
Florian Becker-Ritterspach: Affiliation:
University of Groningen
Christoph Dörrenbächer: Affiliation:
Berlin School of Economics and Law
Mike Geppert: Affiliation:
University of Surrey

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

The objective of this chapter is to provide a critical overview over recent theory-based research on multinational corporations (MNC) conflict. In particular, we seek to understand and explicate the contributions of the various theoretical approaches and perspectives applied in international business (IB) research towards the analysis of conflictual situations and processes in MNC contexts. In modeling conflict in MNC international business, authors draw on diverse theoretical traditions, including psychology, sociology and economics as well as organizational conflict theory. We wish to critically fathom their respective potential for the description and explanation of MNC conflict and, in addition, provide some insights into the theoretical lacunae remaining within the IB conflict research: where and how can we better integrate and extend conflict research in the IB field in order to fully capitalize on the theoretical advancements in conflict research at large? And where do we need to adjust concepts and constructs drawn from related fields to better account for the complex context of MNC conflicts? For reasons expounded upon below, the critical review concentrates on conflicts arising in the MNC headquarters–subsidiary relationship.

Since the MNC as an organization has become an object of study in its own right, it has been characterized as an inherently conflictual arena (Bartlett and Ghoshal 1989; Doz and Prahalad 1991; Gladwin and Walter 1980; Pahl and Roth 1993; Prahalad and Doz 1987).

Type: Chapter
Information: Politics and Power in the Multinational Corporation
The Role of Institutions, Interests and Identities
, pp. 139 - 190

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973352.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alper, S., Tjosvold, D. and Law, K. S. 2000. “Conflict management, efficacy, and performance in organizational teams,” Personnel Psychology 53: 625–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Anderson, M. and Narus, J. A. 1990. “A model of distribution firm and manufacturing firm working partnership,” Journal of Marketing 54: 42–58CrossRef Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. and Cole, P. 1996. “Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups” in Jackson, and Ruderman, (eds.) Diversity in Work Teams. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 185–215Google Scholar

Ashforth, B. E. and Mael, F. 1989. “Social identity theory and the organization,” Academy of Management Review 14: 20–39Google Scholar

Axelrod, R. M. 1970. Conflict of Interest. A Theory of Divergent Goals with Application to Politics. Chicago, IL: MarkhamGoogle Scholar

Axelrod, R. M. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar

Ayoko, O. B., Härtel, C. E. J. and Callan, V. J. 2002. “Resolving the puzzle of productive and destructive conflict in culturally heterogenous workgroups: a communication accommodation theory approach,” International Journal of Conflict Management 13: 165–95CrossRef Google Scholar

Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. S. 1962. “Two faces of power,” The American Political Science Review, 56(4): 947–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. S. 1969. “Decisions and non-decisions: an analytical framework” in Bell, , Edwards, and Wagner, (eds.) Political Power: A Reader in Theory and Research. New York: Free Press, pp. 100–9Google Scholar

Barki, H. and Hartwick, J. 2001. “Conceptualizing the construct of interpersonal conflict,” The International Journal of Conflict Management 15: 216–44CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. 1986. “Tap your subsidiaries for global reach,” Harvard Business Review 64: 87–94Google Scholar

Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar

Becker-Ritterspach, F. 2006. “The social constitution of knowledge integration in MNEs: a theoretical framework,” Journal of International Management 12: 358–77CrossRef Google Scholar

Becker-Ritterspach, F. and Dörrenbächer, C. 2009. “Intra-firm competition in multinational corporations: towards a political framework,” Competition and Change 13: 199–213CrossRef Google Scholar

Becker-Ritterspach, F. and Dörrenbächer, C. 2011. “An organizational politics perspective on intra-firm competition in multinational corporations,” Management International Review (in print)CrossRef Google Scholar

Bennett, J. 2002. “Multinational corporations, social responsibility and conflict,” Journal of International Affairs 55: 393–410Google Scholar

Binmore, K. G. 1987. “Why game theory ‘doesn't work’ ” in Bennett, (ed.) Analysing Conflict and its Resolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 23–42Google Scholar

Birkinshaw, J. M. and Hood, N. 1998. “Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies,” Academy of Management Review 23: 773–95CrossRef Google Scholar

Birkinshaw, J. and Lingblad, M. 2005. “Intrafirm competition and charter evolution in the multibusiness firm,” Organization Science 16: 674–86CrossRef Google Scholar

Björkman, I. and Furu, P. 2000. “Determinants of variable pay for top managers of foreign subsidiaries in Finland,” International Journal of Human Resource Management 11: 698–713CrossRef Google Scholar

Björkman, I., Barner-Rasmussen, W. and Li, L. 2004. “Managing knowledge transfer in MNCs: the impact of headquarters control mechanisms,” Journal of International Business Studies 35: 443–54CrossRef Google Scholar

Black, J. S. and Gregersen, H. B. 1992. “Serving two masters: managing the dual allegiance of expatriate employees,” Sloan Management Review 33: 61–71Google Scholar

Blalock, H. M. 1989. Power and Conflict: Towards a General Theory. Newbury Park: SageGoogle Scholar

Blazejewski, S. 2005. “Transferring value-infused organizational practices in MNCs: a conflict perspective” in Geppert, and Mayer, (eds.) Global, Local and National Practices in Multinational Companies., Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 63–104Google Scholar

Blazejewski, S. 2009. “Actors' interests and local contexts in intrafirm conflict: the 2004 GM and Opel crisis,” Competition & Change 13: 229–50CrossRef Google Scholar

Blazejewski, S. 2010. “When truth is the daughter of time: longitudinal case studies in international business research” in Piekkari, and Welch, (eds.) Rethinking the Case Study in International Business and Management Research: Towards Greater Pluralism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (in print)Google Scholar

Brandenburger, A. and Nalebuff, B. 1996. Co-opetition. New York: DoubledayGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, D. and Badham, R. 1999. “Politics and organizational change: the lived experience,” Human Relations 52: 609–29CrossRef Google Scholar

Chang, E. and Taylor, M. S. 1999. “Control in multinational corporations (MNCs): the case of Korean manufacturing subsidiaries,” Journal of Management 25: 541–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Chatterjee, K. 1996. “Game theory and the practice of bargaining,” Group Decision and Negotiation 5: 355–69.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cheldelin, S., Druckman, D. and Fast, L. (eds.) 2003. Conflict. 1st ed. London: Continuum

Chen, Y.-R. R. 2004. “Effective public affairs in China: MNC – government bargaining power and corporate strategies for influencing foreign business policy formulation,” Journal of Communication Management 8: 395–413CrossRef Google Scholar

Child, J. 1997. “Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations, and environment: retrospect and prospect,” Organization Studies 18: 43–76CrossRef Google Scholar

Clark, E and Geppert, M. 2006. “Socio-political processes in international management in post-socialist contexts: knowledge, learning and transnational institution building,” Journal of International Management 12: 340–57CrossRef Google Scholar

Clegg, S. R., Courpasson, D. and Phillips, N. 2007. Power and Organizations. London: SageGoogle Scholar

Clemens, E. S. and Cook, J. 1999. “Politics and institutionalism: explaining durability and change,” Annual Review of Sociology 25: 441–66CrossRef Google Scholar

Coleman, A. M. 2003. “Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction,” Behavioral and Brain Science 26: 139–53Google Scholar

Coleman, P. T. 2006. “Power and conflict” in Deutsch, , Coleman, and Marcus, (eds.) The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 120–43Google Scholar

Collins, R. 1975. Conflict Sociology: Toward an Explanatory Science. New York: AcademicGoogle Scholar

Collins, R. 1993. “What does conflict theory predict about America's future? 1993 presidential address,” Sociological Perspectives 36: 289–313CrossRef Google Scholar

Coser, L. 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar

Crozier, M. and Friedberg, E. 1981. Actors and Systems. Chicago University PressGoogle Scholar

Dahl, R. A. 1963. Modern Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar

Dahrendorf, R. 1959. Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar

Dahrendorf, R. 1968. Essays in the Theory of Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar

Dalton, M. and Chrobot-Mason, D. 2007. “A theoretical exploration of manager and employee social identity, cultural values and identity conflict management,” International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 7: 169–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Danskin, P., Dibrell, C. and Kedia, B. L. 2005. “The evolving role of cooperation among multinational corporations and indigenous organizations in transition economies: a migration away from confrontation,” Journal of World Business 40: 223–34CrossRef Google Scholar

Deutsch, M. 1973. The Resolution of Conflict. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Deutsch, M. 1980. “Fifty years of conflict” in Festinger, (ed.) Restropections on Social Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 46–72Google Scholar

Deutsch, M. 1982. “Conflict resolution: theory and practice,” Political Psychology 4: 431–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Diehl, P. F. 2006. “Just a phase? Integrating conflict dynamics over time,” Conflict Management and Peace Science 23: 199–210CrossRef Google Scholar

DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. 1983. “The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields,” American Sociological Review 48: 147–60CrossRef Google Scholar

Dixit, A. K. and Skeath, S. 1999. Games of Strategy. New York: NortonGoogle Scholar

Dörrenbächer, C. 2007. “Inside the transnational social space: cross-border management and owner relationships at a German-subsidiary in Hungary,” Journal of East European Management Studies 13: 318–39CrossRef Google Scholar

Dörrenbächer, C. and Gammelgaard, J. 2006. “Subsidiary role development: the effect of micro-political headquarters–subsidiary negotiations on the product, market, and value-added scope of foreign owned subsidiaries,” Journal of International Management 12: 266–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Dörrenbächer, C. and Geppert, M. 2006. “Micro-politics and conflicts in multinational corporations: current debates, re-framing, and contributions of this Special Issue,” Journal of International Management 12: 251–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Dörrenbächer, C. and Geppert, M. 2009. “A micro-political perspective on subsidiary initiative-taking: evidence from German-owned subsidiaries in France,” European Management Journal 27: 100–12CrossRef Google Scholar

Doz, Y. L. and Prahalad, C. K. 1981. “Headquarters influence and strategic control in MNCs,” Sloan Management Review 23: 15–29Google Scholar

Doz, Y. L. and Prahalad, C. K. 1984. “Patterns of strategic control within multinational corporations,” Journal of International Business Studies 15: 55–72CrossRef Google Scholar

Doz, Y. L. and Prahalad, C. K. 1991. “Managing DMNCs: a search for a new paradigm,” Strategic Management Journal 12: 145–64CrossRef Google Scholar

Doz, Y. L., Bartlett, C. A. and Prahalad, C. K. 1981. “Global competitive pressures and host country demands, managing tensions in MNCs,” California Management Review 23: 63–73CrossRef Google Scholar

Dutton, J., Dukerich, J. and Harquail, C. 1994. “Organizational images and member identification,” Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 293–363CrossRef Google Scholar

Earley, P. C. and Laubach, M. 2002. “Structural identity theory and the dynamics of cross-cultural work groups” in Gannon, and Newman, (eds.) The Blackwell Handbook of Cross-Cultural Management. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 256–82Google Scholar

Easton, G. and Araujo, L. 1992. “Non-economic exchange in industrial networks” in Axelsson, and Easton, (eds.) Industrial Networks: A New View of Reality. London: Routledge, pp. 62–84Google Scholar

Edwards, P. K. and Bélanger, J. 2009. “The MNC as a contested terrain” in Collinson, and Morgan, (eds.) Images of the Multinational. Oxford: Wiley, pp. 193–216Google Scholar

Edwards, T. and Kuruvilla, S. 2005. “International HRM: national business systems, organisational politics and the international division of labour in global value chains,” International Journal of Human Resource Management 16: 1–21CrossRef Google Scholar

Edwards, T., Coller, X., Ortiz, L., Rees, C. and Wortmann, M. 2006. “How important are national industrial relations systems in shaping restructuring in MNCs?,” European Journal of Industrial Relations 12: 69–88CrossRef Google Scholar

Edwards, T., Colling, T. and Ferner, A. 2007. “The transfer of employment practices in multinational companies: towards an integrated conceptual approach,” Human Resource Management Journal 17: 201–17CrossRef Google Scholar

Eisenhardt, K. 1989. “Agency theory: an assessment and review,” Academy of Management Review 14: 57–74Google Scholar

Ferner, A. 2000. “The underpinnings of ‘bureaucratic’ control systems: HRM in European multinationals,” Journal of Management Studies 37: 521–40CrossRef Google Scholar

Ferner, A. and Edwards, P. 1995. “Power and diffusion of organizational change within multinational enterprises,” European Journal of Industrial Relations 37: 229–57CrossRef Google Scholar

Ferner, A, Almond, P., Colling, T. and Edwards, T. 2005. “Policies on union representation in US multinationals in the UK: between micro-politics and macro-institutions,” British Journal of Industrial Relations 43: 703–28CrossRef Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage BooksGoogle Scholar

Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. Edited by Gordon, C.. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1982. “The subject and power” in Dreyfus, and Rabinow, (eds.) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Brighton: Harvester Press, pp. 208–26Google Scholar

Frenkel, M. 2008. “The multinational corporation as a third space: rethinking international management discourse on knowledge transfer through Homi Bhabha,” Academy of Management Review 33: 924–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Frost, P. J. 1987. “Power, politics and influence” in Jablin, (ed.) Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 503–48Google Scholar

Gaski, J. F. 1984. “The theory of power and conflict in channels of distribution,” Journal of Marketing 48: 9–29CrossRef Google Scholar

Geppert, M. and Clark, E. 2003. “Knowledge and learning in transnational ventures: an actor-centred approach,” Management Decision 41: 433–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Geppert, M. and Williams, C. 2006. “Global, national and local practices in multinational corporations: towards a sociopolitical framework,” International Journal of Human Resource Management 17: 49–69CrossRef Google Scholar

Ghoshal, S. and Moran, P. 1996. “Bad for practice: a critique of the transaction cost theory,” Academy of Management Review 21: 13–47Google Scholar

Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society, Outline of the Structuration Theory. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Gladwin, T. N. and Walter, I. 1980. Multinationals under Fire: Lessons in the Management of Conflict. New York: John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar

Glasl, F. 2010. Konfliktmanagement. 9th edn. Bern: HauptGoogle Scholar

Gong, Y. 2003. “Toward a dynamic process model of staffing composition and subsidiary outcomes in multinational corporations,” Journal of Management 29: 259–80CrossRef Google Scholar

Graham, J. L. 1985. “The influence of culture on the process of business negotiations: an exploratory study,” Journal of International Business Studies 16: 81–96CrossRef Google Scholar

Gupta, A. K. and Cao, Q. 2005. “Parent-subsidiary conflict within multinational enterprises” Working Paper presented at Academy of Management Conference 2005: Honolulu, HI.

Hardy, C. 1996. “Understanding power: bringing about strategic change,” British Journal of Management 7: 3–16CrossRef Google Scholar

Hayward, M. L. A. and Boeker, W. 1998. “Power and conflicts of interest in professional firms: evidence from investment banking,” Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 1–22CrossRef Google Scholar

Hennart, J. F. 1991. “Control in multinational firms: the role of price and hierarchy,” Management International Review 31: 71–96Google Scholar

Huber, G. P. and Ven, A. H. 1995. Longitudinal Field Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SageGoogle Scholar

Jameson, J. 1999. “Toward a comprehensive model for the assessment and management of intraorganizational conflict: developing the framework,” International Journal of Conflict Management 10: 268–94CrossRef Google Scholar

Jehn, K. A. 1995. “A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict,” Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 256–82CrossRef Google Scholar

Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B. and Neale, M. A. 1999. “Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups,” Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 741–63CrossRef Google Scholar

Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. 1976. “Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure,” Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–60CrossRef Google Scholar

Jones, G. and Khanna, T. 2006. “Bringing history (back) into international business,” Journal of International Business Studies 37: 453–68CrossRef Google Scholar

Joshi, A., Labianca, G. and Caligiuri, P. M. 2002. “Getting along long distance: understanding conflict in a multinational team through network analysis,” Journal of World Business 37: 277–84CrossRef Google Scholar

Jost, P.-J. 1998. Strategisches Konfliktmanagement in Organisationen. Eine spieltheoretische Einführung. 1st edn. Wiesbaden: GablerGoogle Scholar

Karnoe, P. and Nygaard, C. 1999. “Bringing social action and situated rationality back in,” International Studies of Management & Organisation 29: 78–93CrossRef Google Scholar

Katz, D. and Kahn, R. L. 1978. The Social Psychology of Organizations. 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar

Kaufmann, L. and Rössing, S. 2005. “Managing conflicts of interests between headquarters and their subsidiaries regarding technology transfer to emerging markets – a framework,” Journal of World Business 40: 235–53CrossRef Google Scholar

Kiser, E. 1999. “Comparing varieties of agency theory in economics, political science, and sociology: an illustration from state policy implementation,” Sociological Theory 17: 146–70CrossRef Google Scholar

Kostova, T. 1999. “Transnational transfer of strategic organisational practices: a contextual perspective,” Academy of Management Review 24: 308–24CrossRef Google Scholar

Kostova, T. and Roth, K. 2002. “Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects,” Academy of Management Journal 45: 215–33Google Scholar

Kostova, T., Roth, K. and Dacin, M. T. 2008. “Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: a critique and new directions,” Academy of Management Review 33: 994–1006CrossRef Google Scholar

Kristensen, P. H. and Zeitlin, J. 2001. “The making of a global firm: local pathways to multinational enterprise” in Morgan, , Kristensen, and Whitley, (eds.) The Multinational Firm. Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides. Oxford University Press, pp. 172–95Google Scholar

Kristensen, P. H. and Zeitlin, J. 2005. Local Players in Global Games: The Strategic Constitution of a Multinational Corporation. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Lawrence, P. and Lorsch, J. 1967. “Differentiation and integration,” Administrative Science Quarterly 12: 1–30CrossRef Google Scholar

Lukes, S. 1974. Power: A Radical View. London and New York: MacmillanCrossRef Google Scholar

Lukes, S. 1986. Power: A Radical View. New York University PressGoogle Scholar

Mahoney, J. 2000. “Path dependency in historical sociology,” Theory and Society 29: 507–48CrossRef Google Scholar

Mailath, G. J. and Samuelson, L.. 2006. Repeated Games and Reputations: Long-Run Relationships. Oxford University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Miles, R. H. and Perrault, W. D. 1976. “Organizational role conflict: its antecedents and Consequences,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 17: 19–44CrossRef Google Scholar

Mir, R. and Mir, A. 2009. “From the Colony to the corporation: studying knowledge transfer across international boundaries,” Group and Organization Management 34: 90–113CrossRef Google Scholar

Mir, R. and Sharpe, D. R. 2004. “Transferring managerial practices within multinationals: control, resistance and empowerment,” Academy of Management Proceedings 2004: E1–E6CrossRef Google Scholar

Mir, R. and Sharpe, D. R. 2009. “The multinational firm as an instrument of exploitation and domination” in Collinson, and Morgan, (eds.) Images of the Multinational Firm. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 247–65Google Scholar

Mohr, A. T. and Puck, J. F. 2007. “Inter-sender role conflicts, general manager satisfaction and joint venture performance in Indian-German joint ventures,” European Management Journal, 25(1): 25–35.CrossRef Google Scholar

Morgan, G. 2003. “International business and multinationals: a critical management approach.” Paper read at Best Paper Proceedings, Academy of Management Conference 2003: Seattle, WA

Morgan, G. and Kristensen, P. H. 2006. “The contested space of multinationals: varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism,” Human Relations 59: 1467–90CrossRef Google Scholar

Mudambi, R., and Pedersen, T. 2007 “Agency theory and resource dependence theory: complementary explanations for subsidiary power in multinational corporations.” SMG Working Paper, Copenhagen Business School, http://uk.cbs.dk/content/download/60978/ 840515/file/SMG%20WP%202007_5.pdf (last accessed October 13, 2010)

Murninghan, J. K. 1994. “Game theory and organizational behavior” Research in Organizational Behavior 16: 83–125Google Scholar

Nohria, N. and Ghoshal, S. 1994. “Differentiated fit and shared values: alternatives for managing headquarters–subsidiary relations,” Strategic Management Journal 15: 491–502CrossRef Google Scholar

O'Donnell, S. 2000. “Managing foreign subsidiaries: agents of headquarters, or an interdependent network?,” Strategic Management Journal 21: 525–483.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRef Google Scholar

Oliver, C. 1991. “Strategic responses to institutional processes,” Strategic Management Review 16: 145–79Google Scholar

Pahl, J. M. and Roth, K. 1993. “Managing the headquarters–foreign subsidiary relationship: the roles of strategy, conflict, and integration,” The International Journal of Conflict Management 4: 139–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Parkhe, A. 1993. “Strategic alliance structuring: a game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation,” Academy of Management Journal 36: 794–829Google Scholar

Pearson d'Estrée, T. 2003. “Dynamics” in Cheldelin, , Druckman, and Fast, (eds.) Conflict. London: Continuum, pp. 68–87Google Scholar

Peng, M. W. 2000. “Controlling the foreign agent: how governments deal with multinationals in a transition economy,” Management International Review 40: 141–65Google Scholar

Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W. and Cameron, K. S. 2001. “Studying organizational change and development: challenges for future research,” Academy of Management Journal 44: 697–713Google Scholar

Pfeffer, J. 1992. Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar

Pondy, L. R. 1967. “Organizational conflict: concepts and models,” Administrative Science Quarterly 12: 296–320CrossRef Google Scholar

Prahalad, C. K. 1975. “The strategic process in a multinational corporation.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Business Administration, Harvard University

Prahalad, C. K. and Doz, Y. L. 1987. The Multinational Mission: Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar

Rahim, M. A. 1983. “A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict,” Academy of Management Journal 26: 368–76Google Scholar PubMed

Reade, C. 2001. “Dual identification in multinational corporations: local managers and their psychological attachment to the subsidiary versus the global organization,” International Journal of Human Resource Management 12: 405–24CrossRef Google Scholar

Rössing, S. M. 2005. Technology Transfer to China. Frankfurt am Main: European Management PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Roth, K. and Nigh, D. 1992. “The effectiveness of headquarters–subsidiary relationships: the role of coordination, control, and conflict,” Journal of Business Research 25: 277–301CrossRef Google Scholar

Roth, K. and O'Donnell, S. 1996. “Foreign subsidiary compensation strategy: an agency theory perspective,” Academy of Management Journal 39: 687–703Google Scholar

Rubin, J. Z., Pruitt, D. G. and Kim, S. H. 1994. “Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement. 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar

Sanders, W. G. and Carpenter, M. A. 1998. “Internationalization and firm governance: the roles of CEO compensation, top team composition, and board structure,” Academy of Management Journal 41: 158–78Google Scholar

Scharf, F. W. 2006. Interaktionsformen. Akteurszentrierter Institutionalismus in der Politikforschung. 2nd edn. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für SozialwissenschaftenGoogle Scholar

Scheffer, T. 2007. “Event and process: an exercise in analytical ethnography,” Human Studies 30: 167–97CrossRef Google Scholar

Schelling, T. C. 1958. “The strategy of conflict: prospectus for a reorientation of game theory,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2: 203–64CrossRef Google Scholar

Schelling, T. C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Schepers, D. H. 2006. “The impact of NGO network conflict on the corporate social responsibility strategies of multinational corporations,” Business & Society 45: 282–99CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmid, S. and Daniel, A. 2007. “Are subsidiary roles a matter of perception? A review of the literature and avenues for future research.” Working Paper No. 30, ESCP-EAP European School of Management, Berlin

Schütz, A. 1972. Collected Papers. Volume 1. Edited by Natanson, M. A. and Breda, H. L.. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SageGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, S. P. 2005. “Agency theory,” Annual Review of Sociology 31: 263–84CrossRef Google Scholar

Sheppard, B. H. 1992. “Conflict research as schizophrenia: the many faces of organizational conflict,” Journal of Organizational Behavior 13: 325–34CrossRef Google Scholar

Skyrms, B. 2004. The Stag Hunt and the Evolution of Social Structure. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Stern, L. W. and Gorman, R. H. 1969. “Conflict in distribution channels: an exploration” in Stern, (ed.) Distribution Channels: Behavioral Dimensions. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company, pp. 156–175Google Scholar

Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. 1986. “The social identity theory of intergroup behavior” in Worchel, and Austin, (eds.) Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago, IL: Burnham Inc Pub, pp. 7–24.Google Scholar

Tasoluk, B., Yaprak, A. and Calantone, R. J. 2006. “Conflict and collaboration in headquarters–subsidiary relationships. An agency-theory perspective on product rollouts in an emerging market,” International Journal of Conflict Management 17: 332–51CrossRef Google Scholar

Thomas, K. 1976. “Conflict and conflict management” in Dunnette, (ed.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally College Publishing Company, pp. 889–935Google Scholar

Thomas, K. W. 1992. “Conflict and conflict management: reflections and update,” Journal of Organizational Behavior 13: 265–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Tjosvold, D. 1999. “Bridging east and west to develop new products and trust: interdependence and interaction between a Hong Kong parent and north American subsidiary,” International Journal of Innovation Management 3: 233–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Tsui, A. 2007. “From homogenization to pluralism: international management research in the Academy and beyond,” Academy of Management Journal 50: 1353–64Google Scholar

Glinow, M. A., Shapiro, D. L. and Brett, J. M. 2004. “Can we talk. And should we? Managing emotional conflict in multicultural teams,” Academy of Management Review 29: 578–92Google Scholar

Vora, D. T. and T. Kostova 2007. “A model of dual organizational identification in the context of the multinational enterprise,” Journal of Organizational Behavior 28: 327–50CrossRef Google Scholar

Vora, D., Kostova, T. and Roth, K. 2007. “Roles of subsidiary managers in multinational corporations: the effect of dual organizational identification,” Management International Review 47: 595–620CrossRef Google Scholar

Walton, R. E. and Dutton, J. M. 1969. “The management of international conflict: a model and review,” Administrative Science Quarterly 14: 73–84CrossRef Google Scholar

Westney, D. E. 1993. “Institutionalization theory and the multinational corporation” in Ghoshal, and Westney, (eds.) Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation. New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 53–76Google Scholar

Whiteman, G. 2009. “All my relations: understanding perceptions of justice and conflict between companies and indigenous peoples,” Organization Studies 30: 101–20CrossRef Google Scholar

Whitley, R. 1999. Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Whittington, R. 1992. “Putting Giddens into action: social systems and managerial agency,” Journal of Management Studies, 29(6): 693–712CrossRef Google Scholar

Zietsma, C. and Winn, M. I. 2008. “Building chains and directing flows: strategies and tactics of mutual influence in stakeholder conflicts,” Business & Society 47: 68–101CrossRef Google Scholar