Abell, J., Condor, S., and Stevenson, C. (2006). ‘We are an island’: geographical imagery in accounts of citizenship, civil society and national identity in Scotland and in England. Political Psychology, 27, 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. J., and Sanford, R. N. ([1950] 1982). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. (1962). The general and the unique in psychological science. Journal of Personality, 30, 405–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Allyn, J., and Festinger, L. (1961). The effectiveness of unanticipated persuasive communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 35–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar

Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, L., and McGuire, W. (1965). Prior reassurance of group consensus as a factor in producing resistance to persuasion. Sociometry, 28, 44–56.CrossRef

Andrews, M. (2007). Shaping history: narratives of political change. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansolabehere, S., Rodden, J., and Snyder, J. (2008). The strength of issues: using multiple measures to gauge preference stability, ideological constraint, and issue voting. American Political Science Review, 102, 215–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antaki, C. (2003). The uses of absurdity. In van den Berg, H., Wetherell, M. and Houtkoop Steenstra, H. (eds.) Analyzing race talk: multidisciplinary perspectives on the research interview (pp. 85–102). Cambridge University Press.

Antaki, C. (2006). Producing a ‘cognition’. Discourse Studies, 8, 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antaki, C., and Leudar, I. (2001). Recruiting the record: using opponents’ exact words in Parliamentary argumentation. Text, 21, 467–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antaki, C., and Wetherell, M. (1999). Show concessions. Discourse Studies, 1, 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antaki, C., Condor, S., and Levine, M. (1996). Social identities in talk: speakers’ own orientations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 473–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . (1909). Rhetorica. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Assmann, A. (2008). Transformations between history and memory. Social Research, 75, 49–72.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Our masters’ voices. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Atkinson, P., and Silverman, D. (1997). Kundera’s immortality: the interview society and the invention of the self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 304–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Augoustinos, M., and Every, D. (2010). Accusations and denials of racism: managing moral accountability in public discourse. Discourse & Society, 21, 251–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Augoustinos, M., and Reynolds, J. K. (2001). Prejudice, racism and social psychology. In Augoustinos, M. and Reynolds, J. K. (eds.) Understanding prejudice, racism and social conflict (pp. 1–23). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Augoustinos, M., Hastie, B., and Wright, M. (2011). Apologizing for historical injustice: emotion, truth and identity in political discourse. Discourse & Society, 22, 507–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Augoustinos, M., and Tileagă, C. (2012). Twenty five years of discursive psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 405–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Augoustinos, M., Tuffin, K., and Rapley, M. (1999). Genocide or failure to gel? Racism, history and nationalism in Australian talk. Discourse & Society, 10, 351–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Augoustinos, M., Tuffin, K., and Every, D. (2005). New racism, meritocracy and individualism: constraining affirmative action in education. Discourse & Society, 16, 315–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Azzi, A. E., Chryssochoou, X., Klandermans, B., and Simon, B. (eds.) (2011). Identity and participation in culturally diverse societies. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Backes, U. (2009). Political extremes: a conceptual history from antiquity to the present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Backes, U., and Moreau, P. (2011). The extreme right in Europe: current trends and perspectives. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker-Brown, G., Ballard, E., Bluck, S., deVries, B., Suedfeld, P., and Tetlock, P. (1986). Scoring manual for integrative and conceptual complexity. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar

Bartels, L. (2003). Democracy with attitudes. In MacKuen, M. and Rabinowitz, G. (eds.) Electoral democracy (pp. 48–82). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. ([1957] 1993). Mythologies. London: Vintage.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1977). Image-music-text. London: Fontana.Google Scholar

Bartlett, F. C. ([1932] 1995). Remembering: a study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bastian, B., and Haslam, N. (2011). Experiencing dehumanization: cognitive and emotional effects of everyday dehumanization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33, 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, M. W., and Gaskell, G. (1999). Towards a paradigm for research on social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29, 163–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, M. W., and Gaskell, G. (2008). Social representations theory: a progressive research programme for social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38, 335–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumeister, R., and Hastings, S. (1997). Distortions of collective memory: how groups flatter and deceive themselves. In Pennebaker, J., Paez, D. and Rimé, B. (eds.) Collective memory of political events: social psychological perspectives (pp. 277–94). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R., Vohs, K., and Funder, D. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives in Psychological Science, 2, 396–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Becker, A. B., and Scheufele, D. A. (2011). New voters, new outlook? Predispositions, social networks, and the changing politics of gay civil rights. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 324–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Becker, A. B., Dalrymple, K. E., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., and Gunther, A. (2010). Getting citizens involved: how controversial policy debates stimulate issue participation during a political campaign. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22, 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beissinger, M. R. (2009). Debating the color revolutions: an interrelated wave. Journal of Democracy, 20, 74–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, W. L., and Entman, R. M. (eds.) (2001). Mediated politics: communication in the future of democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, W. L., and Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58, 707–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benwell, B., and Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Berelson, B. (1952). Democratic theory and public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 16, 313–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P., and McPhee, W. (1954). Voting: a study of opinion formation in a presidential election. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Berinsky, A. (ed.) (2012). New directions in public opinion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (1976). Social psychology and intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (1978). Fascists: a social psychological view of the National Front. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (1985). Prejudice, categorisation and particularisation: from a perceptual to a rhetorical approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: a rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (1988). The notion of ‘prejudice’: Some rhetorical and ideological aspects. Text, 8, 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and opinions. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (1993). Studying the thinking society: social representations, rhetoric and attitudes. In Breakwell, G. and Canter, D. (eds.) Empirical approaches to social representations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and thinking: a rhetorical approach to social psychology (2nd edn). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (1997). Discursive, rhetorical and ideological messages. In McGarty, C. and Haslam, S. A. (eds.) The message of social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (1998). Talking of the Royal family (2nd edn). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (1999). Freudian repression. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Billig, M. (2002). Henri Tajfel’s ‘Cognitive aspects of prejudice’ and the psychology of bigotry. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 171–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Billig, M. (2003). Political rhetoric. In Sears, D. O., Huddy, L., and Jervis, R. (eds.) Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 222–52). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and ridicule: towards a social critique of humour. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (2008). The hidden roots of critical psychology: understanding the impact of Locke, Shaftesbury and Reid. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (2012). Undisciplined beginnings, academic success, and discursive psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 413–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Billig, M., and MacMillan, K. (2005). Metaphor, idiom and ideology: the search for ‘no smoking guns’ across time. Discourse & Society, 16, 459–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., and Radley, A. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: a social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Blumer, H. (1948). Public opinion and public opinion polling. American Sociological Review, 13, 542–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumler, J. G. (2001). The third age of political communication. Journal of Public Affairs, 1, 201–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumler, J. G., and Kavannagh, D. (1999). The Third Age of political communication: influences and features. Political Communication, 16, 209–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bosveld, W., Koomen, W., and Vogelaar, R. (1997). Construing a social issue: effects on attitudes and the false consensus effect. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 263–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1979). Public opinion does not exist. In Mattelart, A. and Siegelaub, S. (eds.) Communication and class struggle (vol. I) (pp. 124–130). New York: International General/ Intl Mass Media Research Centre.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (2012). Sur l’État: Cours au Collège de France (1989–1992). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Bourhis, R. Y., and Giles, H. (1977). The language of intergroup distinctiveness. In Giles, H. (ed.) Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, V. (1994). Beyond Rokeach’s equality-freedom model: two-dimensional values in a one-dimensional world. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braithwaite, V. (2009a). The value balance model and democratic governance. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braithwaite, V. (2009b). Security and harmony value orientations and their roles in attitude formation and change. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 162–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breakwell, G. (1978). Some effects of marginal social identity. In Tajfel, H. (ed.) Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Brewer, M. B. (2010). Social identity complexity and acceptance of diversity. In Crisp, R. J. (ed.) The psychology of social and cultural diversity (pp. 11–33). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Brewer, M. B., and Campbell, D. T. (1976). Ethnocentrism and intergroup attitudes: East African evidence. New York: Sage.Google Scholar

Brockmeier, J. (2002). Remembering and forgetting: narrative as cultural memory. Culture and Psychology, 8, 15–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brockmeier, J. (2010). After the archive: remapping memory. Culture & Psychology, 16, 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, R. (1965). Social psychology. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar

Brown, R. J. (1995). Prejudice: its social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Brown, R., and Gilman, A. F. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Brown, S. D. (2008). The quotation marks have a certain importance: prospects for a ‘memory studies’. Memory Studies, 1, 261–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (2001). Self-making and world-making. In Brockmeier, J. and Carbaugh, D. (eds.) Narrative and identity: studies in autobiography, self, and culture (pp. 25–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bucur, M. (2009). Heroes and victims: remembering war in twentieth-century Romania. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Bull, P. (2000). Equivocation and the rhetoric of modernisation: an analysis of televised interviews with Tony Blair in the 1997 British General Election. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 222–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bull, P. (2002). Communication under the microscope: the theory and practice of microanalysis. London: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bull, P. (2003). The microanalysis of political communication: claptrap and ambiguity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bunce, V. J., and Wolchik, S. (2009). Debating the color revolutions: getting real about ‘real causes’. Journal of Democracy, 20, 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgess, C. (2011). ‘This election will be won by people not posters’… In Wring, D., Mortimore, R. and Atkinson, S. (eds.) Political communication in Britain (pp. 181–97). London: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar

Burgess, M., Ferguson, N, and Hollywood, I. (2007). Rebels’ perspectives of the legacy of past violence and of the current peace in post-agreement Northern Ireland: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Political Psychology, 28, 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, L., and Turner, R. (2010). The application of diversity-based interventions to policy and practice. In Crisp, R. J. (ed.) The psychology of social and cultural diversity (pp. 322–52). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., and Stokes, D. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. T. (1956). Enhancement of contrast as a composite habit. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 350–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campbell, S. (2008). The second voice. Memory Studies, 1, 41–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cantril, H. (1942). Public opinion in flux. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 22, 136–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cappella, J. N., and Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: the press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., and Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Personality and politics: values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castells, M. (2011). Communication power. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cesereanu, R. (2004). Decembrie ’89. Deconstruct¸ia unei revolut¸ii. Ias¸i: Polirom.Google Scholar

Cesereanu, R. (2008). The Final Report on the Holocaust and the Final Report on the Communist Dictatorship in Romania. East European Politics and Societies, 22, 270–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric: the persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chilton, P. (1996). Security metaphors: Cold War discourse from containment to common European home. Berne and New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: theory and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Chilton, P., and Ilyin, M. (1993). Metaphor in political discourse. Discourse & Society, 4, 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chilton, P., and Schäffner, C. (1997). Discourse and politics. In van Dijk, T. (ed.) Discourse as social interaction (vol. II) (pp. 206–31). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Chouliaraki, L., and Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity: rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Christie, R., and Jahoda, M. (eds.) (1954). Studies in the scope and method of ‘The Authoritarian Personality’. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Ciobanu, M. (2009). Criminalising the past and reconstructing collective memory: the Romanian Truth Commission. Europe-Asia Studies, 61, 313–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clayman, S., and Heritage, J. (2002). The news interview: journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clémence, A., Doise, W., de Rosa, A. S., and Gonzalez, L. (1995). La représentation sociale des droits de l’homme: une recherche internationale sur l’étendue et les limites de l’universalité. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 181–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohrs, J. C., and Stelzl, M. (2010). How ideological attitudes predict host society members’ attitudes toward immigrants: exploring cross-national differences. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 673–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Condor, S. (2000). Pride and prejudice: identity management in English people’s talk about ‘this country’. Discourse & Society, 11, 163–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Condor, S. (2006). Temporality and collectivity: diversity, history and the rhetorical construction of national entitativity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 657–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Condor, S. (2010). Devolution and national identity: the rules of English dis/engagement. Nations & Nationalism, 16, 525–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Condor, S. (2011). Sense and sensibility: the conversational etiquette of English national self-identification. In Aughey, A. and Berberich, C. (eds.) These Englands: a conversation on national identity. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Condor, S., and Figgou, L. (2012). Rethinking the prejudice problematic: a collaborative cognition approach. In Dixon, J. and Levine, M. (eds.) Beyond prejudice: extending the social psychology of conflict, inequality and social change (pp. 200–22). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Condor, S., and Gibson, S. (2007). ‘Everybody’s entitled to their own opinion’: ideological dilemmas of liberal individualism and active citizenship. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 6, 178–99.Google Scholar

Condor, S., Abell, J., Figgou, L., Gibson, S., and Stevenson, C. (2006). ‘They’re not racist … ’: Prejudice denial, mitigation and suppression in dialogue, British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 441–462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Condor, S., Tileagă, C., and Billig, M. (in press). Political rhetoric. In Huddy, L., Sears, D. O. and Levy, J. (eds.) Oxford handbook of political psychology (2nd edn). New York: Oxford University Press.

Connerton, P. (1989). How societies remember. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connolly, W. (1993). The terms of political discourse (3rd edn). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Converse, P. E. (1962). Information flow and the stability of partisan attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 578–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter, D. (ed.) Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–61). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Converse, P. E. (1987). Changing conceptions of public opinion in the political process. Public Opinion Quarterly (Supplement: 50th Anniversary Issue), 51, S12–S24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Converse, P. E. (2006a). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 18, 1–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Converse, P. E. (2006b). Democratic theory and electoral reality. Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 18, 297–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Converse, P. E. (2009). Perspectives on mass belief systems and communication. In Dalton, R. J. and Klingemann, H.-D. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 144–60). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Conway, M. (1997). The inventory of experience: memory and identity. In Pennebaker, J., Paez, D. and Rimé, B. (eds.) Collective memory of political events: social psychological perspectives (pp. 21–46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Coulter, J. (2001). Human practices and the observability of the ‘macro-social’. In Schatzki, T. R., Cetina, K. K. and Savigny, E. (eds.) The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 29–41). London: Routledge.

Crigler, A. N. (1996). Making sense of politics: constructing political messages and meanings. In Crigler, A. N. (ed.) The psychology of political communication (pp. 1–10). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crisp, R., and Hewstone, M. (eds.) (2000). Crossed categorization and intergroup bias: the moderating role of intergroup and affective context. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 357–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crisp, R., and Hewstone, M. (2006). Multiple social categorization: processes, models and applications. Hove, , Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Crisp, R., and Hewstone, M. (2007). Multiple social categorization. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. XXXIX, pp. 163–254). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Crisp, R., Hewstone, M., and Rubin, M. (2001). Does multiple categorization reduce intergroup bias?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalton, R. J. (2008). Citizen politics: public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies (5th edn). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Dalton, R. J., and Klingemann, H.-D. (2009). Citizens and political behavior. In Dalton, R. J. and Klingemann, H.-D. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 3–28). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

D’Anieri, P. (2006). Explaining the success and failure of post-communist revolutions. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 39, 331–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danziger, K. (2008). Marking the mind: a history of memory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deacon, D., and Wring, D. (2011). Reporting the 2010 General election: old media, new media – old politics, new politics. In Wring, D., Mortimore, R. and Atkinson, S. (eds.) Political communication in Britain. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

de Brito, A. B., Enriquez, C. G., and Aguilar, P. (2001). The politics of memory: transitional justice in democratizing societies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Delli Carpini, M. X., and Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Delli Carpini, M. X., and Williams, B. (2001). Let us entertain you: politics in the new media environment. In Bennett, L. and Entman, R. (eds.) Mediated politics: communication in the future of democracy (pp. 160–91). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

De Weerd, M., and Klandermans, M. (1999). Group identification and social protest: farmer’s protest in the Netherlands. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 1,073–95.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewey, J. ([1927] 1954). The public and its problems. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Diab, L. N. (1959). Authoritarianism and prejudice in near-Eastern students attending American universities. Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 175–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dimitrov, M. (2009). Debating the color revolutions: popular autocrats. Journal of Democracy, 20, 78–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, J., and Levine, M. (eds.) (2012). Beyond prejudice: extending the social psychology of conflict, inequality and social change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Doise, W. (2002). Human rights as social representations. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doise, W., and Staerklé, C. (2002). From social to political psychology: the societal approach. In Monroe, K. (ed.) Political psychology (pp. 151–72). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Doise, W., Deschamps, J.-C., and Meyer, G. (1978). The accentuation of intra-category similarities. In Tajfel, H. (ed.) Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Doise, W., Clémence, A., and Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1993). The quantitative analysis of social representations. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Doise, W., Spini, D., and Clémence, A. (1999). Human rights studied as social representations in a cross-national context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 1–29.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doise, W., Staerklé, C., Clémence, A. and Savory, F. (1998). Human rights and Genevan youth: a developmental study of social representations. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 57, 86–100.Google Scholar

Doosje, B., Van den Bos, K., and Loseman, A. (in press). Radicalization process of Islamic youth in the Netherlands: the role of uncertainty, perceived injustice and perceived group threat. Journal of Social Issues.

Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S., and Saguy, T. (2007). Another view of ‘we’: majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 296–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S., and Saguy, T. (2009). Commonality and the complexity of ‘we’: social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Drury, J., and Reicher, S. (2000). Collective action and psychological change: the emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 579–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Drury, J., and Reicher, S. (2009). Collective psychological empowerment as a model of social change: researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 707–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duckitt, J. (1988). Normative conformity and racial prejudice in South Africa. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 114, 413–37.Google Scholar

Duckitt, J. (2003). Prejudice and intergroup hostility. In Sears, D., Huddy, L. and Jervis, R. (eds.) Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 559–600). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Duckitt, J., Bizumic, B. and Heled, E. (2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: the Authoritarianism-Conservatism-Traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31, 685–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duveen, G. (2001). Representations, identities, resistance. In Deaux, K. and Philogene, G. (eds.) Social representations: introductions and explorations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Dzihic, V., and Segert, D. (2012). Lessons from ‘post-Yugoslav’ democratization: functional problems of stateness and the limits of democracy. East European Politics and Societies, 26, 239–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edelman, M. (1967). The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Edelman, M. (1977). Political language: words that succeed and policies that fail. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Edelman, M. (2001). The politics of misinformation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edley, N., and Wetherell, M. (1997). Jockeying for position: the construction of masculine identities. Discourse & Society, 8, 203–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edley, N., and Wetherell, M. (1999). Imagined futures: young men’s talk about fatherhood and domestic life. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 181–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Edwards, D. (1999). Emotion discourse. Culture & Psychology, 5, 271–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, D. (2000). Extreme case formulations: softeners, investment and doing nonliteral. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 23, 347–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, D. (2003). Analysing racial discourse: a view from discursive psychology. In van den Berg, H., Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. and Wetherell, M. (eds.) Analyzing interviews on racial issues: multidisciplinary approaches to interview discourse (pp. 31–48).

Edwards, D. (2006). Facts, norms and dispositions: practical uses of the modal would in police interrogations. Discourse Studies, 8, 475–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, D. (2007). Managing subjectivity in talk. In Hepburn, A. and Wiggins, S. (eds.) Discursive research in practice: new approaches to psychology and interaction (pp. 31–49). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Edwards, D. (2012). Discursive and scientific psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 425–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Edwards, D., and Potter, J. (1992a). Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Edwards, D., and Potter, J. (1992b). The Chancellor’s memory: rhetoric and truth in discursive remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 187–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, D., and Potter, J. (1993). Language and causation: a discursive action model of description and attribution. Psychological Review, 100, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, D., and Potter, J. (2001). Discursive psychology. In McHoul, A. and Rapley, M. (eds.) How to analyse talk in institutional settings (pp. 12–24). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Edwards, D., Ashmore, M., and Potter, J. (1995). Death and furniture: the rhetoric, politics and theology of bottom line arguments against relativism. History of the Human Sciences, 8, 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eiser, J. R. (1971). Enhancement of contrast in the absolute judgment of attitude statements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ekman, J., and Linde, J. (2005). Communist nostalgia and the consolidation of democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 21, 354–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elcheroth, G., Doise, W., and Reicher, S. (2011). On the knowledge of politics and the politics of knowledge: how a social representations approach helps us rethink the subject of political psychology. Political Psychology, 32, 729–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellemers, N., and Barreto, M. (2009). Collective action in modern times: how modern expressions of prejudice prevent collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 749–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ensink, T. (1996). The footing of a Royal address: an analysis of representativeness in political speech, exemplified in Queen Beatrix’ address to the Knesset on March 28, 1995. Current Issues in Language and Society, 3, 205–32.Google Scholar

Entmann, R., and Bennett, L. (2001) Communication in the future of democracy: a conclusion. In Bennett, L. and Entman, R. (eds.) Mediated politics: communication in the future of democracy (pp. 468–480). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Erjavec, K., and Volcic, Z. (2007). ‘War on terrorism’ as a discursive battleground: Serbian recontextualization of G.W. Bush’s discourse. Discourse and Society, 18, 123–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1954). The psychology of politics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (1995a). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (1995b). Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (2000). New Labour, new language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. London: Longman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fairclough, I., and Fairclough, N. (2011). Practical reasoning in political discourse: the UK government’s response to the economic crisis in the 2008 Pre-Budget Report. Discourse and Society, 22, 243–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fairclough, N., and Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In van Dijk, T. A. (ed.) Discourse as social interaction (vol. II). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Farnen, R. F. and Meloen, J. (2000). Democracy, authoritarianism and education: a cross-national empirical survey. Houndmills, Hants: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, S. (2003). Values, ideology and the structure of political attitudes. In Sears, D. O., Huddy, L. and Jervis, R. (eds.) Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 477–510). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ferguson, N., Burgess, M., and Hollywood, I. (2008). Crossing the Rubicon: deciding to become a paramilitary in Northern Ireland. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 2, 130–137.Google Scholar

Ferguson, N., Burgess, M., and Hollywood, I. (2010). Who are the victims? Victimhood experiences in postagreement Northern Ireland. Political Psychology, 31, 857–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkenauer, C., Gisle, L., and Luminet, O. (1997). When individual memories are socially shaped: flashbulb memories of sociopolitical events. In Pennebaker, J., Paez, D. and Rime, B. (eds.) Collective memory of political events: social psychological perspectives (pp. 191–208). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Finlayson, A. (2004). Political science, political ideas and rhetoric. Economy and Society, 33, 528–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finlayson, A. (2007). From beliefs to arguments: interpretative methodology and rhetorical political analysis. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9, 545–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzgerald, R., and Housley, W. (2002). Identity, categorization and sequential organization: the sequential and categorial flow of identity in a radio phone-in. Discourse and Society, 13, 579–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fivush, R. (2008). Remembering and reminiscing: how individual lives are constructed in family narratives. Memory Studies, 1, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleischmann, F., Phalet, K., and Klein, O. (2011). Religious identification and politicization in the face of discrimination: support for political Islam and political action among the Turkish and Moroccan second generation in Europe. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 628–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fowler, R., Hodge, R., Kress, G., and Trew, T. (1979). Language and control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Franklin, B. (2004). Packaging politics: political communications in Britain’s media democracy. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Frijda, N. (1997). Commemorating. In Pennebaker, J., Paez, D. and Rime, B. (eds.) Collective memory of political events: social psychological perspectives (pp. 103–30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Fromm, E. (1942). Fear of freedom. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Gaertner, S. L., and Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: the common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Galasińska, A., and Galasiński, D. (eds.) (2010). The post-communist condition: public and private discourses of transformation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallinat, A. (2006). Difficult stories: public discourse and narrative identity in Eastern Germany. Ethnos, 71, 343–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallinat, A. (2009). Intense paradoxes of memory: researching moral questions about remembering the socialist past. History and Anthropology, 20, 183–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallup, G., and Rae, S. F. (1940). The pulse of democracy: the public opinion poll and how it works. Oxford: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Garton Ash, T. (1990). We the people: the revolution of ’89. Cambridge: Penguin.Google Scholar

Gély, R., and Sanchez-Mazas, M. (2006). The philosophical implications of research on the social representations of human rights. Social Science Information, 45, 387–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gergen, K. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gergen, K. J. (1994). Realities and relationships: soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gergen, K. J. (2005). Narrative, moral identity and historical consciousness: a social constructionist account. In Straub, J. (ed.) Narration, identity and historical consciousness (pp. 99–119). New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Gillespie, A. (2008). Social representations, alternative representations and semantic barriers. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38, 375–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gillespie, A., Cornish, F., Aveling, E. L., and Zittoun, T. (2008). Conflicting community commitments: a dialogical analysis of a British woman’s World War II diaries. Journal of Community Psychology, 36, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, C. (2004). ‘Al Gore’s our guy’: linguistically constructing a family political identity. Discourse & Society, 15, 607–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graber, D. A. (1988). Processing the news: how people tame the information tide (2nd edn). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Graumann, C. F. (1998). Verbal discrimination: a neglected chapter in the social psychology of aggression. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 28, 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greatbatch, D. (1998). Conversation analysis: neutralism in British news interviews. In A. Bell and P. Garrett (eds.) Approaches to media discourse (pp. 163–185). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Halbwachs, M. ([1952] 1992). On collective memory. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Hall, N. R., and Crisp, R. J. (2005). Considering multiple criteria for social categorization can reduce intergroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1,435–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hamilton, D., and Trolier, T. (1986). Stereotypes and stereotyping: an overview of the cognitive approach. In Dovidio, J. F. and Gaertner, S. L. (eds.) Prejudice, discrimination and racism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hammack, P. L., and Pilecki, A. (2012). Narrative as a root metaphor for political psychology. Political Psychology, 33, 75–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardt, H., and Splichal, S. (eds.) (2000). Ferdinand Tönnies on public opinion: selections and analyses. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Harré, R., and Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Harré, R., and Secord, P. F. (1972). The explanation of social behaviour. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Harris, J. (2010). Welcome to the first e-election. Guardian, 17 March. Available online at (last accessed January 2011).

Haslam, N., and Loughnan, S. (2012). Prejudice and dehumanization. In Dixon, J. and Levine, M. (eds.) Beyond prejudice: extending the social psychology of conflict, inequality and social change (pp. 89–104). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haslam, S. A., and Wilson, A. (2000). In what sense are prejudiced beliefs personal? The importance of ingroup shared stereotypes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haste, H. (2012). Where do we go from here in political psychology. Political Psychology, 33, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hastie, R., and Dawes, R. (2010). Rational choice in an uncertain world: the psychology of judgment and decision making (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Heath, A., Fisher, S., and Smith, S. (2005). The globalization of public opinion research. Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 297–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heaven, P. (2001). Prejudice and personality: the case of the authoritarian and social dominator. In Augoustinos, M. and Reynolds, K. (eds.) Understanding prejudice, racism and social conflict (pp. 89–104). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Henry, P. J., Sidanius, J., Levin, S., and Pratto, F. (2005). Social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and support for intergroup violence between the Middle East and America. Political Psychology, 26, 569–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hepburn, A., and Wiggins, S. (eds.) (2007). Discursive research in practice: new approaches to psychology and interaction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herbst, S. (1995). Numbered voices: how opinion polling has shaped American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Herbst, S. (1998). Reading public opinion: How political actors view the democratic process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Herbst, S. (2012). The history and meaning of public opinion. In Berinsky, A. J. (ed.) New directions in public opinion (pp. 19–31). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Heritage, J., and Clayman, S. (2010). Talk in action: interaction, identities and institutions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heritage, J., and Greatbatch, D. (1986). Generating applause: a study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 110–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herrmann, R. (2003). Image theory and strategic interaction in international relations. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy and R. Jervis (eds.) Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 285–314). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Herzlich, C. (1973). Health and illness: a social psychological analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hill, J. (2008). The everyday language of White racism. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobsbawm, E., and Ranger, T. (1992). The invention of tradition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hodges, A. (2008). The politics of recontextualization: discursive competition over claims of Iranian involvement in Iraq. Discourse and Society, 19, 483–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodgkin, K., and Radstone, S. (eds.) (2003). Contested pasts: the politics of memory. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G., and McCrae, R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38, 52–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hogea, A. (2010). Coming to terms with the communist past in Romania: an analysis of the political and media discourse concerning the Tismăneanu Report. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 2, 16–30.Google Scholar

Hogg, M. A., and Abrams, D. (1988). Social identification: a social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hogg, M. A., and Blaylock, D. (2012). Extremism and the psychology of uncertainty. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Holtz, P., and Wagner, W. (2009). Essentialism and attribution of monstrosity in racist discourse: right-wing Internet postings about Africans and Jews. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 411–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopkins, N. (2011). Dual identities and their recognition: minority group members’ perspectives. Political Psychology, 32, 251–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopkins, N., and Kahani-Hopkins, V. (2004). Identity construction and political activity: beyond rational actor theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 339–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hopkins, N., and Kahani-Hopkins, V. (2006). Minority group members’ theories of intergroup contact: a case study of British Muslims’ conceptualizations of ‘Islamophobia’ and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 245–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hopkins, N., and Kahani-Hopkins, V. (2009). Reconceptualizing ‘extremism’ and ‘moderation’: from categories of analysis to categories of practice in the construction of collective identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hopkins, N., Reicher, S., Harrison, K., Cassidy, C., Bull, R., and Levine, M. (2007). Helping to improve the group stereotype: On the strategic dimension of prosocial behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 776–88.CrossRef

Housley, W., and Fitzgerald, R. (2002). Categorization, national identity and debate. In Hester, S. and Housley, W. (eds.) Language, interaction and national identity (pp. 38–59). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Housley, W., and Fitzgerald, R. (2003). Moral discrepancy and political discourse: accountability and the allocation of blame in a political news interview. Sociological Research Online, 8(2), (last accessed February 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hovland, C., and Weiss, W. (1952). The influence of source credibility in communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hovland, C., Janis, I., and Kelley, H. (1953). Communication and persuasion: psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Howarth, C. (2002). Identity in whose eyes? The role of representations in identity construction. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 32, 145–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howarth, C. (2004). Re-presentation and resistance in the context of school exclusion: reasons to be critical. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 14, 356–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howarth, C. (2006). A social representation is not a quiet thing: exploring the critical potential of social representations theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howarth, C. (2010). Social representations theory, communication and identity. In Hook, D., Franks, B. and Bauer, M. (eds.) Communication, culture and social change: the social psychological perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Huckfeldt, R. (2009). Information, persuasion, and political communication networks. In Dalton, R. J. and Klingemann, H.-D. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 100–22). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Huckfeldt, P., Johnson, E., and Sprague, J. (2002). Political environments, political dynamics, and the survival of disagreement. Journal of Politics, 64, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huckfeldt, P., Johnson, E., and Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement: the survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: a critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22, 127–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huddy, L. (2003). Group identity and political cohesion. In Sears, D. O., Huddy, L. and Jervis, R. (eds.) Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 511–58). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Huddy, L. (2004). Contrasting theoretical approaches to intergroup relations. Political Psychology, 25, 947–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huddy, L., Francis, N., and Marilyn, L. (2000). The polls–trends: support for the Women’s Movement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 309–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Huddy, L., Khatib, N., and Capelos, T. (2002). The polls-trends: reactions to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 418–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchby, I. (2006). Media talk: conversation analysis and the study of broadcasting. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Hutchby, I. (forthcoming). The televised interview: political news as social interaction. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Huyssen, A. (2003). Present pasts: urban palimpsests and the politics of memory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Iacob, B. C. (2010). Avem nevoie de o pedagogie a memoriei colective a trecutului comunist. Available at (last accessed January 2011).

Igartua, J., and Paez, D. (1997). Art and remembering traumatic events: the case of the Spanish Civil War. In Pennebaker, J., Paez, D. and Rimé, B. (eds.) Collective memory of political events: social psychological perspectives (pp. 79–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Igo, S. (2007). The averaged American: Surveys, citizens, and the making of a mass public. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Inglehart, R. (2003). How solid is mass support for democracy – and how do we measure it?PS: Political Science and Politics, 36, 51–7.Google Scholar

Inglehart, R. (2009). Postmaterialist values and the shift from survival to self-expression values. In Dalton, R. J. and Klingemann, H.-D. (eds.). The Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 223–39). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Inglehart, R., and Abramson, P. (1999). Measuring postmaterialism. American Political Science Review, 93, 665–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inglehart, R., and Baker, W.E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inglehart, R., and Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: the human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iniguez, L., Valencia, J., and Vazquez, F. (1997). The construction of remembering and forgetfulness: memories and histories of the Spanish Civil War. In Pennebaker, J., Paez, D. and Rimé, B. (eds.) Collective memory of political events: social psychological perspectives (pp. 237–52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Israel, J., and Tajfel, H. (eds.) (1972). The context of social psychology: a critical assessment. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Iyengar, S. (1993). Agenda-setting and beyond: television news and the strength of political issues. In Riker, W. (ed.) Agenda formation (pp. 1–27). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Iyengar, S., and Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: television and American opinion. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Jacobs, L. R., and Shapiro, R. (2000). Politicians don’t pander: political manipulation and the loss of democratic responsiveness. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jahoda, G. (1988). Critical notes and reflections on ‘social representations’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jamieson, K. H. (1988). Eloquence in an electronic age. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Janis, I. (1954). Personality correlates of susceptibility to persuasion. Journal of Personality, 22, 504–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janis, I., and Feshbach, S. (1953). Effects of fear-arousing communications. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaspal, R., and Cinnirella, M. (2010). Coping with potentially incompatible identities: accounts of religious, ethnic, and sexual identities from British Pakistani men who identify as Muslim and gay. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 849–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jefferson, G. (1985). An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In van Dijk, T. A. (ed.) Handbook of discourse analysis (vol. III) (pp. 25–34). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an Introduction. In Lerner, G. H. (ed.) Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–23). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Jervis, R. (2004). The implications of prospect theory for human nature and values. Political Psychology, 25, 163–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jodelet, D. ([1989] 1991). Madness and social representations. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Jodelet, D. (2008). Social representations: the beautiful invention. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38, 411–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joffe, H. (2002). Social representations and health psychology. Social Science Information, 41, 559–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joffe, H. (2003). Risk: from perception to social representation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 55–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., and Banaji, M. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jost, J. T., and Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jost, J. T., Banaji, M., and Nosek, B. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., and Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Knowledge in context: representations, community and culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jovchelovitch, S. (2008). The rehabilitation of common sense: social representations, science and cognitive polyphasia. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38, 431–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jovchelovitch, S. (2010). From social cognition to the cognition of the social. Papers on Social Representations, 19, 3.1–3.10.Google Scholar

Just, M. R., Crigler, A. N., and Neuman, W. R. (1996). Cognitive and affective dimensions of political conceptualization. In Crigler, A. N. (ed.) The psychology of political communication (pp. 133–48). Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar

Kaid, L., and Holtz-Bacha, C. (2006). The Sage handbook of political advertising. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Kaltwasser, C. (2012). The ambivalence of populism: threat and corrective for democracy. Democratization, 19, 184–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kansteiner, W. (2002). Finding meaning in memory: a methodological critique of collective memory studies. History & Theory, 41, 179–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiesler, C., and Kiesler, S. (1969). Conformity. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Kinder, D. R. (2003). Communication and politics in the age of information. In Sears, D. O., Huddy, L. and Jervis, R. (eds.) Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 357–93). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kinder, D. R. (2006). Belief systems today. Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 18, 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinder, D. R., and Kam, C. D. (2009). Us against them: ethnocentric foundations of American opinion. Chicago, IL : Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinder, D. R., and Sanders, L. (1996). Divided by color. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

King, C. (2007). Remembering Romanian communism. Slavic Review, 66, 718–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Klandermans, B. (2003). Collective political action. In Sears, D. O., Huddy, L. and Jervis, R. (eds.) Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 670–709). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Klandermans, B., and Mayer, N. (2006). Extreme right activists in Europe: through the magnifying glass. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Klandermans, B., Sabucedo, J. M., and Rodriguez, M. (2002). Politicization of collective identity: farmer’s identity and farmer’s protest in the Netherlands and Spain. Political Psychology, 23, 235–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klandermans, B., van der Toorn, J., and van Stekelenburg, J. (2008). Embeddedness and identity: how immigrants turn grievances into action. American Sociological Review, 73, 992–1,012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korosteleva, E. (2003). Is Belarus a demagogical democracy?Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 16, 525–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korosteleva, E. (2009). The limits of EU governance: Belarus’s response to the European Neighbourhood Policy. Contemporary Politics, 15, 229–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korosteleva, E. (2012). Questioning democracy promotion: Belarus’ response to the ‘colour revolutions’. Democratization, 19, 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuipers, G. (2011). The politics of humour in the public sphere: cartoons, power and modernity in the first transnational humour scandal. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 14, 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuklinski, J., and Peyton, B. (2009). Belief systems and political decision making. In Dalton, R. J. and Klingemann, H.-D. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 45–64). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

LaCapra, D. (1994). Representing the Holocaust: history, theory, trauma. Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Laclau, E. (1993). The signifiers of democracy. In Carens, J. H. (ed.) Democracy and possessive individualism (pp. 221–34). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: what conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, G. (2010). The political mind. London: Viking.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Lane, R. (1962). Political ideology: why the common man believes what he does. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Lasswell, H. D. (1930). Psychopathology and politics. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Lasswell, H. D., Leites, N., and associates (1949) Language of politics: Studies in quantitative semantics. New York: George W. Stuart.Google Scholar

Lau, R., and Redlawsk, D. (2001). An experimental study of information search, memory and decision making during a political campaign. In Kuklinski, J. (ed.) Political psychology and public opinion (pp. 136–59). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lau, R., and Redlawsk, D. (2006). How voters decide: information processing during election campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lavine, H. (2002). On-line versus memory-based process models. In Monroe, K. R. (ed.) Political psychology (pp. 225–48). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Lavine, H. (2010). Political psychology, vol. I: Theoretical approaches. New York: Sage.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F., and Merton, R. K. (1948). Mass communication, popular taste and organized social action. In Bryson, L. (ed.) The communication of ideas (pp. 95–118). New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., and Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce.Google Scholar

LeCouteur, A., Rapley, M., and Augoustinos, M. (2001). ‘This very difficult debate about Wik’: stake, voice and the management of category memberships in race politics. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 35–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lee, I., Pratto, F., and Johnson, T. B. (2011). Intergroup consensus/disagreement in support of group-based hierarchy: an examination of socio-structural and psycho-cultural factors. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 1,029–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lemaine, J. (1966). Inegalité, comparaison et incomparabilité: esquisse d’une théorie de l’originalité sociale. Bulletin de Psychologie, 20, 1–9.Google Scholar

Leudar, I., and Nekvapil, J. (2000). Presentations of Romanies in the Czech media: on category work in television debates. Discourse & Society, 11, 487–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leudar, I., and Nekvapil, J. (2004). Media dialogical networks and political argumentation. Journal of Language and Politics, 3, 247–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leudar, I., Hayes, J., Nekvapil, J., and Turner Baker, J. (2008). Hostility themes in media, community and refugee narratives. Discourse and Society, 19, 187–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leventhal, H., Singer, R., and Jones, S. (1965). Effects of fear and specificity of recommendation upon attitudes and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 20–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Leventhal, H., Watts, J., and Pagano, F. (1967). Effects of fear and instructions on how to cope with danger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 313–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levin, S., Federico, C. M., Sidanius, J., and Rabinowitz, J. (2002). Social dominance orientation and intergroup bias: the legitimation of favoritism for high-status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 144–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levine, M., and Thompson, K. (2004). Identity, place, and bystander intervention: social categories and helping after natural disasters. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 229–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levine, M., Cassidy, C., and Brazier, G. (2002). Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: two experimental studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1,452–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levine, M., Prosser, A., Evans, D., and Reicher, S. (2005). Identity and emergency intervention: how social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 443–53.CrossRef

Levitsky, S., and Way, L. (2002). Elections without democracy: the rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 13, 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levitsky, S. and Way, L. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leyens, J.-P., Cortes, B., Demoulin, S., Dovidio, J., Fiske, S., Gaunt, R., Paladino, M.-P., Rodriguez-Perez, A., Rodriguez-Torres, R., and Vaes, J. (2003). Emotional prejudice, essentialism, and nationalism. The 2002 Tajfel Lecture. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 703–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linden, A., and Klandermans, B. (2007). Revolutionaries, wanderers, converts, and compliants: life histories of extreme right activists. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 36, 184–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Lippmann, W. ([1927] 2009). The phantom public. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Lockyer, S., and Pickering, M. (2001). Dear shit-shovellers: humour, censure and the discourse of complaint, Discourse & Society, 12, 633–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowenthal, D. (1989). Nostalgia tells it like it wasn’t. In Chase, M. and Shaw, C. (eds.) The imagined past: history and nostalgia (pp. 18–32). Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Lukes, S. (1973). Individualism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lynn, N., and Lea, S. (2003). ‘A phantom menace and the New Apartheid’: the social construction of asylum-seekers in the United Kingdom. Discourse & Society, 14, 425–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marcus, G., Neuman, W., and MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Marcus, G., Sullivan, J., Theiss-Morse, E., and Wood, S. (1995). With malice toward some: how people make civil liberties judgements. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mark, J. (2010). The unfinished revolution: making sense of the communist past in Central and Central-Eastern Europe. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (2000). Amédée or how to get rid of it: social representations from a dialogical perspective. Culture & Psychology, 6, 419–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marková, I. (2001). Dialogical perspectives of democracy as social representation. Critical Studies, 16, 125–39.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (2004). Trust and democratic transition in post-communist Europe. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marková, I. (2006). On ‘the inner alter’ in dialogue. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 1, 125–48.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (2008). The epistemological significance of the theory of social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 38, 461–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marková, I. (2012). ‘Americanization’ of European social psychology. History of the Human Sciences, 25, 108–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. L. (2001). The authoritarian personality, 50 years later: what questions are there for political psychology?Political Psychology, 22, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsuda, M., Lawrence, C., Delgado, R., and Crenshaw, K. (1993). Words that wound: critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the first amendment. Boulder, CO:Westview Press.Google Scholar

McClosky, H. (1964). Consensus and ideology in American politics. American Political Science Review, 58, 361–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCombs, M., and Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGarty, C., and Penny, R. E. (1988). Categorization, accentuation and social judgement. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 147–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGee, M. C. (1980). The ‘ideograph’: a link between rhetoric and ideology. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 66, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGraw, K. M. (2001). Political accounts and attribution processes. In Kuklinski, J. H. (ed.) Citizens and politics: perspectives from political psychology (pp. 160–97). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McGraw, K. M. (2003). Political impressions: formation and management. In Sears, D. O., Huddy, L. and Jervis, R. (eds.) Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 394–432). New York: Oxford University Press.

McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: some contemporary approaches. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. I) (pp. 191–229). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

McGuire, W. J. (1993). The poly-psy relationship: three phases of a long affair. In Iyengar, S. and McGuire, W. J. (eds.) Explorations in political psychology (pp. 9–35). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

McGuire, W., and Papageorgis, D. (1961). The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 24–34.CrossRef

McKinlay, A., and McVittie, C. (2008). Social psychology and discourse. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNair, B. (2011). An introduction to political communication (5th edn). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: a triumph of faith – a failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55, 89–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merino, M. E., and Tileagă, C. (2011). The construction of ethnic minority identity: a discursive psychological approach to ethnic self-definition in action. Discourse and Society, 22, 86–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merriam, C. E. (1924). The significance of psychology for the study of politics. The American Political Science Review, 18, 469–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Middleton, D., and Brown, S. D. (2005). The social psychology of experience: studies in remembering and forgetting. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Middleton, D., and Brown, S. D. (2007). Issues in the socio-cultural study of memory: making memory matter. In Valsiner, J. and Rosa, A. (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of socio-cultural psychology (pp. 661–77). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Middleton, D., and Edwards, D. (eds.) (1990). Collective remembering. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. (2008). On liberty and other essays (ed. with an Introduction and Notes by John Gray). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Miller, B. (1999). Narratives of guilt and compliance in unified Germany: Stasi informers and their impact on society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Miller, B. (2003). Portrayals of past and present selves in the life stories of former Stasi informers. In Humphrey, R., Miller, R. and Zdravomyslova, E. (eds.) Biographical research in Eastern Europe: altered lives and broken biographies (pp. 101–14). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Miller, J. M., and Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 301–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Misztal, B. (2003). Theories of social remembering. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Misztal, B. (2005). Memory and democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 1,320–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moghaddam, F. (2008). The psychological citizen and the two concepts of social contract: a preliminary analysis. Political Psychology, 29, 881–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mondak, J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mondak, J., and Gearing, A. (2003). Civic engagement in a post-communist state. In Bădescu, G. and Uslaner, E. M. (eds.) Social capital and the transition to democracy (pp. 140–64). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mondak, J., and Halperin, K. D. (2008). A framework for the study of personality and political behavior. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 335–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mondak, J., and Hibbing, M. (2012). Personality and public opinion. In Berinsky, A. (ed.) New directions in public opinion (pp. 217–38). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mondak, J., Hibbing, M., Canache, D., Seligson, M., and Anderson, M. (2010). Personality and civic engagement: an integrative framework for the study of trait effects on political behavior. American Political Science Review, 104, 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monroe, K. R., Hankin, J., and van Vechten, R. B. (2000). The psychological foundations of identity politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 419–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montgomery, M. (2008). The discourse of the broadcast news interview: a typology. Journalism Studies, 9, 260–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1961). La Psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1972). Society and theory in social psychology. In Israel, J. and Tajfel, H. (eds.) The context of social psychology: a critical assessment (pp. 17–68). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representations. In Forgas, J. P. (ed.) Social cognition (pp. 181–209). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In Farr, R. and Moscovici, S. (eds.) Social representations (pp. 3–70). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1989). Les thèmes d’une psychologie politique. Hermès, 5–6, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1998). The history and actuality of social representations. In U. Flick (ed.) The Psychology of the Social (pp. 209–247). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (2008). Psychoanalysis: its image and its public. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (2011). An essay on social representations and ethnic minorities. Social Science Information, 50, 442–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar