Abe, H. et al. (1990). The Government and Politics of Japan. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar

Aberbach, J. D. & Rockman, B. A. (2009). The Appointments Process and the Administrative Presidency. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 39 (1), 38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akizuki, K. (2010). History and Context of Public Administration in Japan in Berman, E. et al., eds., Public Administration in East Asia: Mainland China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bearfield, D. A. (2009). What Is Patronage? A Critical Reexamination. Public Administration Review, 69(1), 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berenschot, W. & Aspinall, E. (2020) How Clientelism Varies: Comparing Patronage Democracies. Democratization, 27(1), 1–19.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. C. (1989). Bureaucratic Primacy: Japanese Policy Communities in an American Perspective. Governance, 2(1), 5–22.Google Scholar

Curtis, G. (1999). The Logic of Japanese Politics: Leaders, Institutions, and the Limits of Change. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Driscoll, B. (2018). Why Political Competition Can Increase Patronage. Studies in Comparative International Development, 53, 404–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukui, H. (1970). Party in Power: The Japanese Liberal-Democrats and Policy-making. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibney, F. ed. (1998). Unlocking the Bureaucrat’s Kingdom: Deregulation and the Japanese Economy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Hayao, K. (1993). The Japanese Prime Minister and Public Policy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchcroft, P. D. (2014). Linking Capital and Countryside: Patronage and Clientelism in Japan, Thailand, and the Philippines in Brun, D. A. & Diamond, L., eds., Clientelism, Social Policy and the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 174–203.Google Scholar

Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy 1925–1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Kenny, P. D. (2015). The Origins of Patronage Democracy: State Building, Centrifugalism, and Decolonization. British Journal of Political Science, 45(1) 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kikuchi, M. (2010). Public Policy Process and Citizens Participation in Japan in Berman, E., et al., eds., Public Administration in East Asia: Mainland China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 273–290.Google Scholar

Kingston, J., ed. (2019). Critical Issues in Contemporary Japan, Second Edition. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koh, B. C. (1989). Japan’s Administrative Elite. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Kopecky, P. et al. (2016). Party Patronage in Contemporary Democracies: Results from an Expert Survey in 22 Countries from Five Regions. European Journal of Political Research, 55, 416–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krauss, E. & Pekkanen, R. J. (2011). The Rise and Fall of Japan’s LDP. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maclachlan, P. (2014). The Electoral Power of Japanese Interests Groups. Journal of East Asian Studies, 14, 429–458.Google Scholar

Muramatsu, M. & Krauss, E. (1984). Bureaucrats and Politicians in Policy Making: The Case of Japan. American Political Science Review, 78(1), 126–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nakamura, A. & Kikuchi, M. (2011). Japanese Public Administration at the Crossroads: Declining Trust in Government and Civil Service Reform in the Age of Fiscal Retrenchment in Massey, A., ed., International Handbook on Civil Service Systems. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. 282–304.Google Scholar

National Personnel Authority. (2020). Profile of National Public Employees in Japan.Google Scholar

Neary, I. (2019). The State and Politics in Japan. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Painter, M. (2010). Legacies Remembered, Lessons Forgotten: The Case of Japan in Peters, G. & Painter, M., eds., Tradition and Public Administration. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 84–98.Google Scholar

Panizza, F., et al. (2019) Testing Roles, Trust and Skills: A Typology of Patronage. Public Administration, 97, 14–161.Google Scholar

Pempel, T. J. (1974). The Bureaucratization of Policymaking in Postwar Japan. American Journal of Political Science, 18(4), 647–664.Google Scholar

Pempel, T. J. (1992). Political Parties and Representation: The Case of Japan. Political Science and Politics, 25(1), 13–18.Google Scholar

Pempel, T. J. ed. (1990). Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Peters, G. & Pierre, J. eds. (2004). The Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramseyer, M. & Rosenbluth, F. (1993). Japan’s Political Marketplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Reed, S. (2021). Patronage and Predominance: How the LDP Maintains Its Hold on Power. Social Science Japan Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/ssjj/jyab033Google Scholar

Resh, W. G. (2015). Rethinking the Administrative Presidency: Trust, Intellectual Capital, and Appointee-Careerist Relations in the George W. Bush Administration. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Samuels, R. J. (1987) Research Collaboration in Japan. M.I.T.-Japan Science and Technology Program Working Paper No. 2. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Scheiner, E. (2007). Clientelism in Japan: The importance and limits of institutional explanations in Kitschelt, H. & Wilkinson, S. eds., Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 276–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shefter, M. (1994). Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Shimizu, Y. (2019). The Origins of the Modern Japanese Bureaucracy. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Silberman, B. (1993). Cages of Reason: The Rise of the Rational State in France, Japan, the United States, and Great Britain. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Sorauf, F. J. (1960). The Silent Revolution in Patronage. Public Administration Review, 20 (1), 28–34.Google Scholar

Spaulding, R. M. (1967). Imperial Japan’s Higher Civil Service Examinations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Takenaka, H. (2014). Failed Democratization in Prewar Japan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Tsuji, K. (1984). Public Administration in Japan. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar

Yamamoto, H. (2017). Interpretation of the Pacifist Article of the Constitution by the Bureau of Cabinet Legislation: A New Source of Constitutional Law? Washington International Law Journal, 26(1), 99–124.Google Scholar

Adiyamaa, S. (2021). Элчин сайдуудыг гацаагч Ерɵнхийлɵгч (The President who blocks the ambassadors). https://news.mn/r/2409524/ (accessed November 15, 2021).Google Scholar

Anews. (2019). НИТХ-ын шинэхэн дарга С. Амарсайхантай танилц (Introduction of S. Amarsaikhan, the new chairman of the Citizen’s Representative Khural). http://m.anews.mn/?nid=19692 (accessed November 25, 2021).Google Scholar

Bat-Ulzii, Erdenedalai. (2020). Монголын улс тɵрийн намын тɵлɵвшлийн асуудалд (Улс тɵрийн авилгын жишээн дээр) (On the development of Mongolian political parties (In the example of political corruption). Тɵрийн байгуулал судлал (Public Administration Studies), No. 3, 6–15.Google Scholar

Batbayar, Erdenebat. (2016). Democratic Revolution and Capitalist Development of Mongolia. Retrieved October 15, 2021. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/socresp_etds/4 (accessed November 15, 2021).Google Scholar

Batzaya, S. (2019, February 1). Хотоос “хотын фракц”-ыг салгах акц (An action to separate the “city faction” from the city). http://eagle.mn/r/56229 (accessed November 25, 2021).Google Scholar

Bayarkhuu, D. (2021). Угаасаа дипломат албыг онилоод байгаа юм биш УУ? (Were they targeting the diplomatic service from the beginning?) www.sonin.mn/blog/bayarkhuud/121322 (accessed November 15, 2021).Google Scholar

Bertelsmann Foundation. (2020). Bertelsmann Transformation Index. https://bti-project.org/en/index/political-transformation (accessed November 14, 2021).Google Scholar

Civil Service Council, Mongolia. (2021, November 5). Монгол Улсын Тɵрийн албаны ʏйл ажиллагааны тайлан-2020 он (Civil Service of Mongolia in 2020: Annual Report). https://csc.gov.mn/s/52/914 (accessed November 15, 2021).Google Scholar

Civil Service Council and World Bank. (2020). Mongolia – Towards a High Performing Civil Service: Reform Progress and Challenges. World Bank, Ulaanbaatar.Google Scholar

Dierkes, Julian. (2016, September 12). Future of the DP? Mongolia Focus. http://blogs.ubc.ca/mongolia/2016/where-to-for-democratic-party/ (accessed November 14, 2021).Google Scholar

Freedom House. (2021). Freedom in the World. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world (accessed November 14, 2021).Google Scholar

Jargalsaikhan, Mendee. (2019). Small Islands of Democracy in an Authoritarian Sea: Explaining Mongolian and Kyrgyz Democratic Development. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, Department of Political Science.Google Scholar

Jargalsaikhan, Uriankhan B. (2001). Алаг жарны бодрол (Reflections on Sixty Years). Ulaanbaatar: Interpress.Google Scholar

Khangai, L. (2021). Москва дахь элчин сайдын яам: Тʏʏх, онцлог (Mongolian Embassy in Moscow: History and Particularities). Монгол-Оросын дипломат харилцааны хɵгжил-100 жил: ϴнгɵрсɵн, одоо, ирээдʏй (Development of Mongolian-Russian Diplomatic Relations – 100 Years: Past, Present and Future) Conference Proceedings. Ulaanbaatar: UdamSoyol.Google Scholar

Kherlen, Badarch. (2013). Integrating New Values into Mongolian Public Management. Ph.D. dissertation. Potsdam: Universität Potsdam.Google Scholar

Kopecký, P., Mair, P., and Spirova, M. (Eds.). (2012). Party patronage and party government in European democracies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mahmood, Mahroor. (2005). Corruption in civil administration: Causes and cures. Humanomics, No. 3, 62–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maxima Consulting. (2019). Perceptions of Corruption in Politics and Law Enforcement Bodies. Ulaanbaatar: Maxima Consulting.Google Scholar

MONTSAME. (2021). Шʏʏгчийн цалин (Judge salary) www.montsame.mn/mn/read/250546 (accessed November 15, 2021).Google Scholar

Munkhtamir, B. (2021, February 10). Ерɵнхийлɵгч Х.Баттулга, “Голомт”-ын Д.Баясгалан нар хожсон (President Kh. Battulga and Golomt’s D. Bayasgalan won.) https://news.mn/r/2400569/ (accessed November 25, 2021).Google Scholar

National Statistical Office, Mongolia. (2021). Монгол Улсын хʏн ам 2020 онд (Mongolian Population in 2020). https://1212.mn/BookLibraryDownload.ashx?url=Population_2020.pdf&ln=Mn (accessed November 20, 2021).Google Scholar

Nyamulzii, A. (2020, October 28). Х.Нямбаатар: УДШ бол компаниуд хуулийн зɵвлɵхɵɵ уралдаж тавьдаг газар биш (Nyambaatar: The Supreme Court is not a place where companies compete for placing their legal advisors). https://ikon.mn/n/20ug (accessed November 25, 2021).Google Scholar

Oyunsuren, D. (2021). Дипломатуудтай хийсэн ярилцлага II (Interviews with diplomats II) in print.Google Scholar

Radchenko, Sergey and Jargalsaikhan, Mendee. (2017). Mongolia in the 2016–17 electoral cycle: The blessings of patronage. Asian Survey, 1032–1057.Google Scholar

Research Institute of Labour and Social Protection of Mongolia. (2017). Youth unemployment and economic inactivity. Research Report. Ulaanbaatar.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Ryan. (2012). Unraveling the Population History of the Xiongnu to Explian Molecular and Archaeological Models of Prehistoric Mongolia. Las Vegas: University of Nevada.Google Scholar

Shuud.mn. (2015) Дипломат албанд орох хаалга 20 саяар нээгддэг ʏʏ? (Does the door to the diplomatic service open for 20 million?). www.shuud.mn/a/455133 (accessed on November 15, 2021)Google Scholar

Social Medee. (2021). Хууль бусаар томилогдсон гэх УИХ-ын гишʏʏн М.Оюунчимэгийн хʏʏ Б.Энхмɵрɵнг ажлаас нь чɵлɵɵлжээ (B. Enkhmoron, the son of MP M Oyunchimeg, who was allegedly illegally appointed, has been dismissed). http://socialmedee.mn/29678.html (accessed November 15, 2021).Google Scholar

The Parliament of Mongolia. (2017). Law of Mongolia on the Civil Service. https://legalinfo.mn/mn/detail/15786 (accessed November 20, 2021).Google Scholar

Tsolmon, D., Oyunsuren, D., and Bayasgalan, S. (2009). Гадаад бодлого, дипломат ажиллагаа, дипломат албаны ʏндэс (Introduction to Foreign Policy, Diplomacy and Diplomatic Service). Ulaanbaatar: MunkhiinUseg Group.Google Scholar

Zumberellkham, Shurentsetseg. (2012). The Political Impact on the Civil Service System in Mongolia (Case study of personnel selection process). Master Thesis. Sejong: KDI School of Public Policy and Management.Google Scholar

24Barimt (24 Facts). (2018, November 15). Тɵрийн албаны ургийн мод (Family Trees in Civil Service). https://24barimt.mn/2263.html (accessed October 23, 2021).Google Scholar

Aberbach, J.D. and Rockman, B.A., 2009. The Appointments Process and the Administrative Presidency. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 39 (1), 38–59.Google Scholar

Askim, J., Karlsen, R., and Kolltveit, K., 2017. Political Appointees in Executive Government: Exploring and Explaining Roles using a Large-N survey in Norway. Public Administration, 95 (2), 342–358.Google Scholar

Bearfield, D.A., 2009. What Is Patronage? A Critical Reexamination. Public Administration Review, 69 (1), 64–76.Google Scholar

Chang, T.-C., 2008. The Political Logic of Economic Liberalization in Taiwan: The Transformation of Party-state Capitalism and the Reconstruction of State-business Relations. Taiwan Political Science Reviews, 12 (1), 101–145. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Chen, D.-Y., 2012. Democratic Governance: An Institutional Reconciliation of Public Administration and Democracy. Taipei: WuNan Book Inc. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Chen, M. and Chu, Y., 1992. Regional Oligopoly, Local Factions, and Provincial Assembly Elections. Proceedings of the National Science Council, 2 (1), 77–97.Google Scholar

Cheng, L. and White, L., 1990. Elite Transformation and Modern Change in Mainland China and Taiwan: Empirical Data and the Theory of Technocracy. The China Quarterly, 121, 1–35.Google Scholar

Cheng, T.-J., 1989. Democratizing the Quasi-Leninist Regime in Taiwan. World Politics, 41 (4), 471–499.Google Scholar

Chiu, Y.-C. and Hsu, Y.-M., 2004. “New” Government, “Old” Bureaucracy: Regime Turnover and Mobility of Administrative Elites. Journal of Public Administration, 12, 1–40. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Cohen, J.E., 1986. On the Tenure of Appointive Political Executives: The American Cabinet, 1952–1984. American Journal of Political Science, 30 (3), 507–516.Google Scholar

Cooper, C.A., 2021. Politicization of the Bureaucracy across and within Administrative Traditions. International Journal of Public Administration, 44 (7), 564–577.Google Scholar

Duverger, M., 1980. A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government. European Journal of Political Research, 8 (2), 165–187.Google Scholar

Flinders, M. and Matthews, F., 2010. Think Again: Patronage, Governance and the Smarter State. Policy & Politics, 38 (4), 639–656.Google Scholar

Hahm, S.D., Jung, K., and Lee, S.Y., 2013. Exploring the Determinants of the Entry and Exit of Ministers in Korea: 1980–2008. Governance, 26 (4), 657–675.Google Scholar

Hao, P.-C., 2013. The Evolution of Semi-presidentialism: Presidentialization and Cabinet Instability. Issue & Studies, 52 (1), 101–141.Google Scholar

Hart, P. ’t and Wille, A., 2006. Ministers and Top Officials in the Dutch Core Executive: Living Together, Growing Apart? Public Administration, 84 (1), 121–146.Google Scholar

Hollibaugh, G.E., Horton, G., and Lewis, D.E., 2014. Presidents and Patronage. American Journal of Political Science, 58 (4), 1024–1042.Google Scholar

Hsu, Y.-M. and Chen, H.-C., 2004. Local Factions and the Kuomintang: Decline or Deepening Crisis? Taiwanese Sociology, 8, 193–228. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Hsu, Y.-M. and Chen, H.-C., 2007. Intra-party Factional Competition and the Fate of the Party Election: A Case Study of the Democratic Progressive Party. Political Science Review, 31, 129–174. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Hu, L.-T., 2007. A Comparison on Administrative Elites’ Mobility before and after Party Alternation in Taiwan. National Elite, 3 (4), 31–42. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Huang, C.-H. and Chen, D.-Y., 2018. The Interaction between Political Appointees and Career Officials: A Study of Bureaucrats’ Tolerance of Politics in Taiwan. Soochow Journal of Political Science, 36 (2), 1–64. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Huang, T.-Y., 2013. From Value Difference to Partnership: the Interactive Management between Political Appointees and Bureaucrats. Taipei, Taiwan: WuNan Book Inc. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Huang, T.-Y., Chen, D.-Y., and Yu, C., 2005. The Political Attitudes of Public Managers in Taiwan. The Chinese Public Administration Review, 14 (2), 1–32.Google Scholar

Huang, T.-Y. and Huang, Z.-X., 2020. New Problems, Old Paradoxes? Assessing the Dual-track System of Third-Level Agency Heads’ Appointments. Soochow Journal of Political Science, 38 (2), 1–54. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Hung, M.-J., 2020. The Development and Impacts of the Politicization of Civil Service System: With Reference to the U.K. Case. Journal of Public Administration, 59, 31–65. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Jan, C.-Y., 2017. History and Context of Public Administration in Taiwan. In: Berman, E.M., ed. Public Administration in East Asia: Mainland China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 497–516.Google Scholar

Kopecký, P., Mair, P., and Spirova, M., 2014. Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kopecký, P., Sahling, J.-H.M., Panizza, F., Scherlis, G., Schuster, C., and Spirova, M., 2016. Party Patronage in Contemporary Democracies: Results from an Expert Survey in 22 Countries from Five Regions. European Journal of Political Research, 55 (2), 416–431.Google Scholar

Lee, D.S., 2018. Portfolio Allocation as the President’s Calculations: Loyalty, Copartisanship, and Political Context in South Korea. Journal of East Asian Studies, 18 (3), 345–365.Google Scholar

Lewis, D.E., 2009. Revisiting the Administrative Presidency: Policy, Patronage, and Agency Competence. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 39 (1), 60–73.Google Scholar

Mansergh, L. and Thomson, R., 2007. Election Pledges, Party Competition, and Policymaking. Comparative Politics, 39 (3), 311–329.Google Scholar

Martínez-Gallardo, C. and Schleiter, P., 2015. Choosing Whom to Trust: Agency Risks and Cabinet Partisanship in Presidential Democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 48 (2), 231–264.Google Scholar

Moe, T.M., 1985. The Politicized Presidency. In: Chubb, J.E. and Peterson, P.E., eds. The New Direction in American politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 235–272.Google Scholar

Moynihan, D.P. and Wilson, J.Q., 1964. Patronage in New York State, 1955–1959. The American Political Science Review, 58 (2), 286–301.Google Scholar

Nathan, R.P., 1983. The Administrative Presidency. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Neto, O.A., 2006. The Presidential Calculus: Executive Policy Making and Cabinet Formation in the Americas. Comparative Political Studies, 39 (4), 415–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neto, O.A. and Samuels, D., 2010. Democratic Regimes and Cabinet Politics: a Global Perspective. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos Legislativos, 1 (1), 10–23.Google Scholar

Panizza, F., Peters, B.G., and Larraburu, C.R.R., 2019. Roles, Trust and Skills: A Typology of Patronage Appointments. Public Administration, 97 (1), 147–161.Google Scholar

Peters, B.G. and Pierre, J., 2004. The Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: A Quest for Control. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Petrovsky, N., James, O., Moseley, A., and Boyne, G.A., 2017. What Explains Agency Heads’ Length of Tenure? Testing Managerial Background, Performance, and Political Environment Effects. Public Administration Review, 77 (4), 591–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Resh, W.G., 2015. Rethinking the Administrative Presidency: Trust, Intellectual Capital, and Appointee-Careerist Relations in the George W. Bush Administration. Baltimore: JHU Press.Google Scholar

Rudalevige, A., 2009. The Administrative Presidency and Bureaucratic Control: Implementing a Research Agenda. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 39 (1), 10–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shen, Y., 2012. Comparative Research on the “Power Presidentialization” of Semi-Presidentialism. Taiwan Democracy Quarterly, 9 (4), 1–36. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Shen, Y., 2014. Government Type and Dual Executive System under the Semi-Presidentialism: Comparative Study of Taiwan and Romania. Taiwan Democracy Quarterly, 11 (3), 41–82. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Sorauf, F.J., 1956. State Patronage in a Rural County. The American Political Science Review, 50 (4), 1046–1056.Google Scholar

Sorauf, F.J., 1960. The Silent Revolution in Patronage. Public Administration Review, 20 (1), 28–34.Google Scholar

Su, T.-T., 2017. Civil Service Reforms in Taiwan. In: Berman, E.M., ed. Public Administration in East Asia: Mainland China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 609–626.Google Scholar

Tsai, H.-C., 2012. Taiwan’s Democratic Governance: Interaction between Political Appointees and Bureaucrats. Taipei: Taiwan Brain Trust. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Tzelgov, E. and Wang, Y.-T., 2016. Party Ideology and Clientelistic Linkage. Electoral Studies, 44, 374–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wang, C.-S., 2006. Judicial Independence Reform and the Breakdown of the Kuomintang Clientelism in Taiwan. The Taiwanese Political Science Review, 10 (1), 103–162. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Wang, C.-S., 2007. The Openness of Political Market and the Breakdown of Local Factions. Journal of Electoral Studies, 14 (2), 25–51. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Wang, C.-S. and Kurzman, C., 2007. Dilemmas of Electoral Clientelism: Taiwan, 1993. International Political Science Review, 28 (2), 225–245.Google Scholar

Wang, F., 1994. The Political Economy of Authoritarian Clientelism in Taiwan. In: Roniger, L. and Güneş-Ayata, A., eds. Democracy, Clientelism, and Civil Society. London: Lynne Rienner, 181–206.Google Scholar

Waterman, R.W. and Ouyang, Y., 2020. Rethinking Loyalty and Competence in Presidential Appointments. Public Administration Review, 80 (5), 717–732.Google Scholar

Weingrod, A., 1968. Patrons, Patronage, and Political Parties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 10 (4), 377–400.Google Scholar

Wilson, J.Q., 1961. The Economy of Patronage. Journal of Political Economy, 69 (4), 369–380.Google Scholar

Wu, Y.-S., 2014. Comparing Development Models in Mainland China and Taiwan: A Macro Analytical Framework. In: Leng, Tse-Kang and Wu, Yu-Shan, eds. Chinese Models of Development: Global, Local, and Comparative Perspectives. 165–187.Google Scholar

Yu, C., 2016. Democracy and Administration: The Impact and Influence of Party Alternation on Civil Service. Journal of Civil Service, 8 (3), 1–20. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Aberbach, J. D., & Rockman, B. A. (2000). In the Web of Politics: Three Decades of The US Federal Executive. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Berlinski, S., Dewan, T., & Dowding, K. (2007). The length of ministerial tenure in the United Kingdom, 1945–97. British Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 245–262.Google Scholar

Choi, S. J. (2020). Korean civil service systems from recruitment to retirement. In Moon, C. I., & Moon, M. J. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Korean Politics and Public Administration. Routledge.Google Scholar

Choi, S. O., & Park, S. M. (2013). The Establishment of Career Civil Service System in the Korean Government. Ministry of Strategy and Finance.Google Scholar

Dewan, T., & Dowding, K. (2005). The corrective effect of ministerial resignations on government popularity. American Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 46–56.Google Scholar

Durant, R. (1992). The American President Revisited. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Evans, P., & Rauch, J. E. (1999). Bureaucracy and growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of “Weberian” state structures on economic growth. American Sociological Review, 64(5), 748–765.Google Scholar

Haggard, S., Kang, D., & Moon, C. I. (1997). Japanese colonialism and Korean development: A critique. World Development, 25(6), 867–881.Google Scholar

Hahm, S. D., Jung, K., & Lee, S. Y. (2013). Exploring the determinants of the entry and exit of ministers in Korea: 1980–2008. Governance, 26(4), 657–675.Google Scholar

Hess, S. (1976). Organizing the Presidency. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

HollibaughJr, G. E., Horton, G., & Lewis, D. E. (2014). Presidents and patronage. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1024–1042.Google Scholar

Hong, S., & Kim, Y. (2019). Loyalty or competence: Political use of performance information and negativity bias. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 829–840.Google Scholar

Huber, J. D., & Martinez-Gallardo, C. (2008). Replacing cabinet ministers: Patterns of ministerial stability in parliamentary democracies. American Political Science Review, 102(2), 169–180.Google Scholar

Kim, B. H., & Hong, S. (2019). Political change and turnovers: How do political principals consider organizational, individual, and performance information? Public Choice, 181(3), 291–308.Google Scholar

Kim, B. K. (1987). Bringing and Managing Socioeconomic Change: The State in Korea and Mexico. Harvard University.Google Scholar

Kim, P. S. (2004). Presidential personnel innovation for presidential appointees in Korea: toward an institutional presidency. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, 24(3), 235–246.Google Scholar

Kim, P. S. (2009). A case for performance management for political appointees. Public Personnel Management, 38(4), 1–18.Google Scholar

Kohli, A. (1994). Where do high growth political economies come from? The Japanese lineage of Korea’s “developmental state”. World Development, 22(9), 1269–1293.Google Scholar

Krause, G. A., & O’Connell, A. J. (2011). Compliance, competence, and bureaucratic leadership in US federal government agencies: A Bayesian generalized latent trait analysis. Working paper.Google Scholar

Lee, S. Y., Jae Moon, M., & Hahm, S. D. (2010). Dual faces of ministerial leadership in South Korea: Does political responsiveness or administrative responsibility enhance perceived ministerial performance? Administration & Society, 42(1_suppl), 77S–101S.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. E. (2011). Presidential appointments and personnel. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 47–66.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. E., & Waterman, R. W. (2013). The invisible presidential appointments: An examination of appointments to the department of labor, 2001–11. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 43(1), 35–57.Google Scholar

Mackenzie, G. C. (1981). The Politics of Presidential Appointments. Free Press.Google Scholar

Moe, T. M. (1985). The politicized presidency. In Chubb, J. E. & Peterson, P. E. (Eds.), The New Direction in American Politics (pp. 235–271). Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Moynihan, D. P., & Roberts, A. S. (2010). The triumph of loyalty over competence: The Bush administration and the exhaustion of the politicized presidency. Public Administration Review, 70(4), 572–581.Google Scholar

Ouyang, Y., Haglund, E. T., & Waterman, R. W. (2017). The missing element: Examining the loyalty‐competence nexus in presidential appointments. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 47(1), 62–91.Google Scholar

Park, S., & Kim, B. S. (2014). Who is appointed to what position? The politics of appointment in quangos of Korea. Public Organization Review, 14(3), 325–351.Google Scholar

Pfiffner, J. P. (1996). The Strategic Presidency: Hitting the Ground Running (2nd ed.). University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Poocharoen, O. O., & Brillantes, A. (2013). Meritocracy in Asia Pacific: Status, issues, and challenges. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33(2), 140–163.Google Scholar

Rho, S. Y., and Lee, S. J. (2017) History and context of public administration in South Korea. In Berman, E. M. (Ed.), Public Administration in East Asia: Mainland China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan (pp. 329–354). Routledge.Google Scholar

Sundell, A. (2014). Are formal civil service examinations the most meritocratic way to recruit civil servants? Not in all countries. Public Administration, 92(2), 440–457.Google Scholar

Waterman, R. W. (1989). Presidential Influence and the Administrative State. University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar

Wood, B. D., & Waterman, R. W. (1994). Bureaucratic Dynamics: The Role of Bureaucracy in a Democracy. Westview Press.Google Scholar

Abinales, P. N. (2005). Life after the Coup: The Military and Politics in Post-Authoritarian Philippines, Philippine Political Science Journal, 26(49), 27–62.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Susan R., Desierto, Diane Alferez and Volosin, Natalia (2011). Hyper-Presidentialism: Separation of Powers without Checks and Balances in Argentina and the Philippines, Berkeley Journal of International Law, 29(1), 246–333.Google Scholar

Alfiler, M. C. P. (2008). The Philippine Administrative System as Enabling Institution. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 52(2–4), 224–244.Google Scholar

Bach, T., Hammerschmid, G. and Löffler, L. (2018). More Delegation, more Political Control? Politicization of Senior-level Appointments in 18 European Countries. Public Policy and Administration, 35(1), 3–23.Google Scholar

Baracskay, Daniel (2009). Political Patronage [electronic resource]. The First Amendment Encyclopedia, Middle Tennessee State University (accessed Jan 27, 2021). www.mtsu.edu/rst-amendment/article/1140/political-patronageGoogle Scholar

Billington, James H. (1999). Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith. Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Brillantes, A. B., Jr. and Fernandez-Carag, M. T. (2016). Building Executive Capacity in the Public Service for Better Governance: The Philippine Civil Service. In Podger, A. and Wanna, J. (Eds.). Sharpening the Sword of State: Building Executive Capacities in the Public Services of the Asia-Pacific (pp. 151–180). Acton, Australia: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar

Career Executive Service Board. (n.d.). CES Statistics Report. Retrieved from www.cesb.gov.ph/Google Scholar

Carino, Ledivina V. (1985). The Politicization of the Philippine Bureaucracy: Corruption or Commitment? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 51(1), 13–18, March.Google Scholar

Carino, Ledivina V. (1990). An Assessment of Public Administration in the Philippines, 1986–1988, PIDS Working Paper Series No.1990–03.Google Scholar

Civil Service Commission. (n.d.). Inventory of Government Personnel Overview. Accessed at http://www.csc.gov.phGoogle Scholar

Constantino as cited in Robles, Alan C. (2008). Civil Service Reform. Whose service? Development + Cooperation (D+C).Google Scholar

Constantino-David, Karina. (2007). “Politics, Perils and Pains of Building Institutions”. Keynote address to the Human Development Network General Assembly. March.Google Scholar

Corpuz, Onofre D. (1957). The Bureaucracy in the Philippines. Manila: University of the Philippines.Google Scholar

De Guzman, R. P., Brillantes, A. B. Jr. and Pacho, A. G. (1988). The Bureaucracy. In De Guzman, R. P. and Reforma, M. A. (Eds.), Government and Politics of the Philippines (pp. 180–206). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

De Leon, (2000). Reforms in the Philippine Civil Service.Google Scholar

Endriga, Jose N. (2001). The National Civil Service System of the Philippines. In Burns, John P. and Bowornwathana, Bidhya (Eds.), Civil Service System in Asia (pp. 212–248). United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hedman, Eva-Lotta E. and Sidel, John T., (2000). Philippine Politics and Society in the Twentieth Century: Colonial Legacies, Post-Colonial Trajectories (p. 125). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Heydarian, R. J. (2018). The Rise of Duterte: A Populist Revolt against Elite Democracy. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-5918-6Google Scholar

Heywood, Paul M. (2018). Cooptation: Recruiting Clients and Patrons. In Ledeneva, A. (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Informality: Understanding Social and Cultural Complexity, Volume 2 (Open Access) (pp. 380–382). [7.10] London: UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787351899Google Scholar

Hodder, R. (2014). High-level Political Appointments in the Philippines. Singapore: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-4560-05-4Google Scholar

Jones, Clayton (1989). Assessing the Marcos Legacy. Philippines. The Christian Science Monitor.Google Scholar

Kerkvliet, B. J. T. (1995). Toward a More Comprehensive Analysis of Philippine Politics: Beyond the Patron-Client. Factional Framework. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 26(2), 401–419.Google Scholar

Kingdon, John W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, H. and Wilkinson, S. I. (2007). ‘Citizen-Politician Linkages: An Introduction’. In Kitschelt, H.and Wilkinson, S. I. (Eds.), Patron, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kopecký, P., Mair, P. and Spirova, M. (Eds.). (2012). Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kreuzer, Peter (2020). A Patron-Strongman who delivers. Explaining enduring public support for President Duterte in the Philippines. A Peace Research Institute Frankfurt Report 1/2020.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. E. (2008). The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

McCoy, Alfred (Ed.). (1994). An Anarchy of Families: State and Family in the Philippines. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University.Google Scholar

Mendoza, Ronald U. and Ocampo, Jude B. (2017). Caught between Imperial Manila and the Provincial Dynasties: Towards a New Fiscal Federalism, in: Public Policy vols. XVI&XVII, 29–51, https://t1p.de/6yv9Google Scholar

Mendoza, Maria Fe Villamejor and Baylon, Minerva S. (2018). “The State of the Philippine Public Bureaucracy: Challenges and Prospects” Paper presented at the International Conference on “The State of Public Bureaucracy in East Asia” held on 6–7 July, 2018 at the Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar

Mintrom, Michael and Norman, Phillipa (2009). Policy Entrepreneurship and Policy Change. The Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 2009.Google Scholar

Monsod, Toby C. (2015). Political intervention in the Philippine bureaucracy, 1987–2010: How, where and to what effect? UPSE Discussion Paper No. 2015–17.Google Scholar

Monsod, T.C. (2017). Political Appointees in the Philippine Bureaucracy: Do Increasing Numbers Help or Harm? Philippine Political Science Journal, DOI: 10.1080/01154451.2017.1320130, 2017Google Scholar

Ocampo, Romeo B. (2008). From Public Administration to Public Management, from Governance to Governmentality: Conceptual Challenges to Public Administration. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 52(2–4), 91–118.Google Scholar

Peters, Guy B., Larraburu, Conrado and Francisco, Panizza (2018). Roles, Trust and Skills: A Typology of Patronage Appointments. DOI: 10.1111/padm.12560. Also in Public Administration, Wiley Online.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G. (2013). Politicisation: What Is It and Why should We Care? In Civil Servants and Politics (pp. 12–24). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Quimpo, Nathan Gilbert (2005). Oligarchic Patrimonialism, Bossism, Electoral Clientelism and Contested Democracy in the Philippines. Comparative Politics, 37(2), 229–50. DOI: 10.2307/20072884Google Scholar

Quimpo, Nathan Gilbert (2007). “Trapo Parties and Corruption” KASAMA Vol. 21 No. 1, Solidarity Philippines-Australia Network, January–March.Google Scholar

Rappler Pia Ranada (2021). “The Davao Boys Are Alright” Duterte Final Year. July 9.Google Scholar

Reyes, Jeremiah (2015). Loob and Kapwa: An Introduction to a Filipino Virtue Ethics. Asian Philosophy 25(2), 1–24. DOI: 10.1080/09552367.2015.1043173Google Scholar

Robles, A. C. (2007). The Asia-Europe Meeting: the theory and practice of interregionalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Scott, J. C. (1972). Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia. American political science review 66(1), 91–113.Google Scholar

Tadem, T. S. E. (2018). Technocracy and Class Politics in Policy-making. In Thompson, M. R. and Batalla, E. V. C. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Philippines (pp. 267–272). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Teehankee, Julio C. (2012). “Clientelism and Party Politics in the Philippines.” In Tomas, Dirk and Ufen, Andreas (Eds.), Clientelism and Electoral Competition in Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines (pp. 186–214). Oxford, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Thompson, Mark Richard (2014). The Politics Philippine Presidents Make, Critical Asian Studies, 46(3), 433–460, July.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tjiptoherijanto, Prijono (2008). “Civil Service Reforms in the Philippines: The Role of Civil Society”, A Report Submitted to The Nippon Foundation Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines August.Google Scholar

Veneracion, J. B. (1988). Merit or Patronage: A History of the Philippine Civil Service. Quezon City: Great Books Trading.Google Scholar

Wong, Pak Nung and Lara-De Leon, Kristinne (2018). Padrino System (The Philippines) In Ledeneva, A. (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Informality: Understanding Social and Cultural Complexity, Volume 2 (Open Access) (pp. 380–382). [7.10] UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787351899Google Scholar

World Bank (2018). Strengthening Human Resources in the Philippine Bureaucracy: Developing a Modern, Fit for Purpose Civil Service to Support a “Middle Class” Society. Draft Report. www.cesb.gov.ph www.csc.gov.ph www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1987/07/25/executive-order-no-292/www.ocialgazette.gov.ph/1991/10/10/republic-act-no-7160-s-1991/ www.dbm.gov.ph 1987 Philippine Constitution PD 1 Act No. 5 Executive Order No. 292, Revised Administrative Code of 1987, Section 7. RA 11466 Rule I, General Policies on Recruitment, 2017 Omnibus Rules on Appointments and Other Human Resource Actions (ORAOHRA), Revised 2018.Google Scholar