Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 ‘To be Deborah’: the political implications of providentialism under a female ruler
- 2 Announcing the godly common weal: Knox, Aylmer and the parameters of counsel
- 3 Feats of incorporation: the ideological bases of the mixed monarchy
- 4 Contesting the social order: ‘resistance theory’ and the mixed monarchy
- 5 Godly men and nobles: the bicephalic body politic
- 6 Godly men and parliamentarians: the politics of counsel in the 1570s
- 7 Rewriting the common weal: Sir Thomas Smith and the De Republica Anglorum
- Afterword
- Bibliography
- Index
- IDEAS IN CONTEXT
2 - Announcing the godly common weal: Knox, Aylmer and the parameters of counsel
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 August 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 ‘To be Deborah’: the political implications of providentialism under a female ruler
- 2 Announcing the godly common weal: Knox, Aylmer and the parameters of counsel
- 3 Feats of incorporation: the ideological bases of the mixed monarchy
- 4 Contesting the social order: ‘resistance theory’ and the mixed monarchy
- 5 Godly men and nobles: the bicephalic body politic
- 6 Godly men and parliamentarians: the politics of counsel in the 1570s
- 7 Rewriting the common weal: Sir Thomas Smith and the De Republica Anglorum
- Afterword
- Bibliography
- Index
- IDEAS IN CONTEXT
Summary
I wrote how that me semyd no woman ought soveranly or supremely to reygne upon man.
Sir John Fortescue, Works (1475)In Elizabeth's reign, and in no small measure because of the influential reading of her accession as providential, an understanding of queenship and English history developed which promoted the characteristic conguration of Elizabethan politics that I described in chapter 1: counsel insistently proposed to, and at points imposed upon, the female ruler by her godly male subjects. In a society that defined women as spiritually decient and lacking the capacity for political virtue – a view given weight and immediacy by the failures of Mary I's reign – recourse to providentialism constituted a powerful means of legitimating a female holder of the imperial crown. However, reading Elizabeth as ‘Deborah’ and her ‘government’ as providentially ordained to secure Protestantism, at home and abroad, inevitably gave rise to political tensions during the reign. It did so because of the ambiguity of the concept of ‘prophecy’ and the linkage between prophecy and God's expressed will on the one hand, and ongoing fears about the destabilising social consequences of religious reformation on the other.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Political Culture in the Reign of Elizabeth IQueen and Commonwealth 1558–1585, pp. 46 - 74Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1999