Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures and tables
- Preface
- 1 Understanding political change in Southeast Asia
- Part I Capitalism, economic growth and political change
- Part II State-socialist countries and authoritarian stability
- 6 Vietnam
- 7 Cambodia and Laos
- 8 Burma/Myanmar
- 9 Southeast Asia in the twenty-first century
- References
- Index
6 - Vietnam
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures and tables
- Preface
- 1 Understanding political change in Southeast Asia
- Part I Capitalism, economic growth and political change
- Part II State-socialist countries and authoritarian stability
- 6 Vietnam
- 7 Cambodia and Laos
- 8 Burma/Myanmar
- 9 Southeast Asia in the twenty-first century
- References
- Index
Summary
Vietnam's regime has been stable and strong since 1975. After the country was split and mostly at war for three decades, it was reunified as the Socialist Republic of Vietnam at the end of the Vietnam War. While the regime has been officially communist, it gradually reformed its economy in favour of open markets, private property and capitalist investment. Its economy shows few remnants of its communist past. Its political institutions, however, retain the main features of communist regimes. Political reform has occurred but has been much slower. Overall, the regime has transformed itself since 1975 but has remained stable and firmly entrenched.
Prior to 1975, Vietnam constitutes a somewhat exceptional case. Not only was it divided into two, but also North and South Vietnam were almost continually at war with each other. The international context of the Cold War played a crucial role in determining the types of political regimes and their sustainability. In the South, successive governments were highly dependent on French and then American support. They failed to gain strong local support among the population. They were consequently vulnerable to the ideological appeal and promises of the communist North. In the meantime, the communist regime in the North used anti-colonial nationalist ideology as well as promises of a more egalitarian society to gain widespread support among the rural masses. Similarly this appeal grew in the South as war ravaged the countryside and its regime showed few attempts to address the population's needs.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Political Change in Southeast Asia , pp. 149 - 164Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013