Anusha, L. S., Nagendra, K. N., Bianda, M.et al. (2011). Analysis of the forward-scattering Hanle effect in the Ca I 4227 Å Line. The Astrophysical Journal, 737(2), 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auer, L. H. and Heasley, J. N. (1978). The origin of broad-band circular polarization in sunspots. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 64, 67–71.Google Scholar

Belluzzi, L. (2009). On the physical origin of the Second Solar Spectrum of the Sc II line at 4247 Å. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 508, 933–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belluzzi, L., Trujillo Bueno, J., and Landi Degl’Innocenti, E. (2007). The magnetic sensitivity of the Ba II D1 and D2 lines of the Fraunhofer spectrum. The Astrophysical Journal, 666(1), 588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belluzzi, L., Landi Degl’Innocenti, E., and Trujillo Bueno, J. (2009). The physical origin and the diagnostic potential of the scattering polarization in the Li I resonance doublet at 6708 Å. The Astrophysical Journal, 705(1), 218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berdyugina, S. V., Nagendra, K. N., and Ramelli, R., eds. (2009). Solar Polarization 5: In Honor of Jan Olof Stenflo. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 405. San Francisco CA: Astronomical Society of the Pacific.Google Scholar

Bianda, M., Ramelli, R., Anusha, L. S.et al. (2011). Observations of the forward scattering Hanle effect in the Cal 4227 Å line. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 530, L13 (4pp).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bommier, V. (1980). Quantum theory of the Hanle effect. II – Effect of level-crossings and anti-level-crossings on the polarization of the D3 helium line of solar prominences. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 87, 109–120.Google Scholar

Bommier, V. (1997a). Master equation theory applied to the redistribution of polarized radiation, in the weak radiation field limit. I – Zero magnetic field case. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 328, 706–725.Google Scholar

Bommier, V. (1997b). Master equation theory applied to the redistribution of polarized radiation, in the weak radiation field limit. II – Arbitrary magnetic field case. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 328, 726–751.Google Scholar

Bommier, V. and Sahal-Bréchot, S. (1978). Quantum theory of the Hanle effect – Calculations of the Stokes parameters of the D3 helium line for quiescent prominences. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 69, 57–64.Google Scholar

Casini, R. and Manso Sainz, R. (2005). Line formation theory for the multiterm atom with hyperfine structure in a magnetic field. The Astrophysical Journal, 624(2), 1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casini, R., Landi Degl’Innocenti, E., Landolfi, M., and Trujillo Bueno, J. (2002). On the atomic polarization of the ground level of Na I. The Astrophysical Journal, 573(2), 864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

del Toro Iniesta, J. C. (2003). Introduction to Spectropolarimetry. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golub, L., De Moortel, I., and Shimizu, T., eds. (2012). Fifth Hinode Science Meeting. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 456. San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific.Google Scholar

Hale, G. E. (1908). On the probable existence of a magnetic field in sun-spots. The Astrophysical Journal, 28, 315–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanle, W. (1924). Über magnetische Beeinflussung der Polarisation der Resonanzfluoreszenz. Zeitschrift für Physik, 30(1), 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holzreuter, R. and Stenflo, J. (2007). Scattering polarization in strong chromospheric lines. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 472(3), 919–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Illing, R. M. E., Landman, D. A., and Mickey, D. L. (1975). Broad-band circular polarization of sunspots – Spectral dependence and theory. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 41, 183–185.Google Scholar

Ivanov, V. V. (1991). Analytical methods of line formation theory: Are they still alive?. In Crivellari, L., Hubeny, I., and Hummer, D. G., eds., Stellar Atmospheres: Beyond Classical Models. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, J. R., Harrington, D. M., Lin, H.et al., eds. (2011). Solar Polarization 6. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 437. San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific.Google Scholar

Landi Degl’innocenti, E. (1982). The determination of vector magnetic fields in prominences from the observations of the Stokes profiles in the D3 line of helium. Solar Physics, 79(2), 291–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landi Degl’Innocenti, E. (1983). Polarization in spectral lines. I – A unifying theoretical approach. Solar Physics, 85(1), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landi Degl’Innocenti, E. (1984). Polarization in spectral lines. III – Resonance polarization in the non-magnetic, collisionless regime. Solar Physics, 91(1), 1–26.Google Scholar

Landi Degl’Innocenti, E. (1998). Evidence against turbulent and canopy-like magnetic fields in the solar chromosphere. Nature, 392(6673), 256–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landi Degl’Innocenti, E. and Landolfi, M. (2004). Polarization in Spectral Lines. Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 307. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landolfi, M. and Landi Degl’Innocenti, E. (1982). Magneto-optical effects and the determination of vector magnetic fields from Stokes profiles. Solar Physics, 78, 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leroy, J. L., Ratier, G., and Bommier, V. (1977). The polarization of the D3 emission line in prominences. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 54, 811–816.Google Scholar

Lites, B. W., Kubo, M., Socas-Navarro, H.et al. (2008). The horizontal magnetic flux of the quiet-Sun internetwork as observed with the Hinode spectro-polarimeter. The Astrophysical Journal, 672(2), 1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manso Sainz, R. and Trujillo Bueno, J. (2003). Zero-field dichroism in the solar chromosphere. Physical Review Letters, 91(11), 111102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manso Sainz, R. and Trujillo Bueno, J. (2007). Scattering polarization of the Ca II infrared triplet as diagnostic of the quiet solar chromosphere. In Heinzel, P., Dorotovic, I., and Rutten, R. J., eds., The Physics of Chromospheric Plasmas. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 368. San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, p. 155.Google Scholar

Narukage, N., Tsuneta, S., Bando, T.et al. (2011). Overview of chromospheric Lyman-alpha spectropolarimeter (CLASP). In SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications. Bellingham WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics, p. 81480H.Google Scholar

Omont, A., Smith, E. W., and Cooper, J. (1973). Redistribution of resonance radiation. II – The effect of magnetic fields. The Astrophysical Journal, 182, 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Povel, H. P. (2001). Ground-based instrumentation for solar magnetic field studies, with special emphasis on the Zurich Imaging Polarimeters ZIMPOL-I and II. In Mathys, G., Solanki, S. K., and Wickramasinghe, D. T., eds., Magnetic Fields Across the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 248. San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, p. 543.Google Scholar

Rachkovsky, D. N. (1962a). Magneto-optical effects in spectral lines of sunspots. Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, 27, 148–161.Google Scholar

Rachkovsky, D. N. (1962b). Magnetic rotation effects in spectral lines. Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, 28, 259–270.Google Scholar

Sahal-Bréchot, S., Bommier, V., and Leroy, J. L. (1977). The Hanle effect and the determination of magnetic fields in solar prominences. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 59, 223–231.Google Scholar

Solanki, S. K. (1993). Small-scale solar magnetic fields: An overview. Space Science Reviews, 63(1–2), 1–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stenflo, J. O. (1973). Magnetic-field structure of the photospheric network. Solar Physics, 32(1), 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stenflo, J. O. (1980). Resonance-line polarization. V. Quantum-mechanical interference between states of different total angular momentum. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 84, 68–74.Google Scholar

Stenflo, J. O. (1982). The Hanle effect and the diagnostics of turbulent magnetic fields in the solar atmosphere. Solar Physics, 80(2), 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stenflo, J. O. (1987). Observational constraints on a “hidden,” turbulent magnetic field of the sun. Solar Physics, 114(1), 1–19.Google Scholar

Stenflo, J. O. (1994). Solar Magnetic Fields: Polarized Radiation Diagnostics. Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 189. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stenflo, J. O. (1997). Quantum interferences, hyperfine structure, and Raman scattering on the Sun. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 324, 344–356.Google Scholar

Stenflo, J. O. (1998). Hanle-Zeeman scattering matrix. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 338, 301–310.Google Scholar

Stenflo, J. O. (2003). Scattering polarization in magnetic fields: Anomalies, surprises and enigmas. In Trujillo Bueno, J. and Sanchez Almeida, J., eds., Solar Polarization 3. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 307. San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, pp. 385–398.Google Scholar

Stenflo, J. O. (2005). Polarization of the Sun’s continuous spectrum. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 429(2), 713–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stenflo, J. O. (2006). Second Solar Spectrum: A brief overview. In Casini, R. and Lites, B. W., eds., Solar Polarization 4. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 358. San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, pp. 215–224.Google Scholar

Stenflo, J. O. (2009). The Sun as a Rosetta stone for polarization physics. In Berdyugina, S., Nagendra, K. N., and Ramelli, R., eds., Solar Polarization 5: In Honor of Jan Olof Stenflo. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 405. San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar

Stenflo, J. O. (2011). Unsolved problems in solar polarization. In Kuhn, J. R., Harrington, D. M., Lin, H.et al., eds., Solar Polarization 6. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 437. San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar

Stenflo, J. O. (2012). Scaling laws for magnetic fields on the quiet Sun. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 541, A17 (12pp).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stenflo, J. O. (2013a). Horizontal or vertical magnetic fields on the quiet Sun. Angular distributions and their height variations. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 555, A132 (12pp).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stenflo, J. O. (2013b). Solar magnetic fields as revealed by Stokes polarimetry. The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 21(1), 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stenflo, J. O. and Keller, C. U. (1997). The Second Solar Spectrum. A new window for diagnostics of the Sun. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 321, 927–934.Google Scholar

Stenflo, J. O., Dravins, D., Wihlborg, N.et al. (1980). Search for spectral line polarization in the solar vacuum ultraviolet. Solar Physics, 66(1), 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stenflo, J. O., Twerenbold, D., and Harvey, J. W. (1983a). Coherent scattering in the solar spectrum – Survey of linear polarization in the range 3165–4230 Å. Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 52, 161–180.Google Scholar

Stenflo, J. O., Twerenbold, D., Harvey, J. W., and Brault, J. W. (1983b). Coherent scattering in the solar spectrum – Survey of linear polarization in the range 4200–9950 Å. Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 54(3), 505–514.Google Scholar

Stenflo, J. O., Harvey, J. W., Brault, J. W., and Solanki, S. (1984). Diagnostics of solar magnetic fluxtubes using a Fourier transform spectrometer. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 131(2), 333–346.Google Scholar

Stenflo, J. O., Keller, C. U., and Gandorfer, A. (2000). Anomalous polarization effects due to coherent scattering on the Sun. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 355, 789–803.Google Scholar

Stepanov, V. E. (1958). The absorption coefficient of atoms in the case of reverse Zeeman effect for arbitrary directed magnetic fields. Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, 18, 136–150.Google Scholar

Stepanov, V. E. and Severny, A. B. (1962). A photoelectric method for measurements of the magnitude and direction of the solar magnetic field. Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, 28, 166–193.Google Scholar

Thalmann, C., Stenflo, J. O., Feller, A., and Cacciani, A. (2009). Magnetic field dependence of polarized scattering on potassium. In Berdyugina, S., Nagendra, K. N., and Ramelli, R., eds., Solar Polarization 5: In Honor of Jan Olof Stenflo. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 405. San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, pp. 113–118.Google Scholar

Trujillo Bueno, J. (2001). Atomic polarization and the Hanle effect. In Sigwarth, M., ed., Advanced Solar Polarimetry – Theory, Observation, and Instrumentation. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 236. San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, pp. 161–195.Google Scholar

Trujillo Bueno, J. T. and Landi Degl’Innocenti, E. (1997). Linear polarization due to lower level depopulation pumping in stellar atmospheres. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 482(2), L183–L186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trujillo Bueno, J., Casini, R., Landolfi, M., and Landi Degl’Innocenti, E. (2002a). The physical origin of the scattering polarization of the Na I D lines in the presence of weak magnetic fields. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 566(1), L53–L57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trujillo Bueno, J., Landi Degl’Innocenti, E., Collados, M., Merenda, L., and Manso Sainz, R. (2002b). Selective absorption processes as the origin of puzzling spectral line polarization from the Sun. Nature, 415(6870), 403–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Trujillo Bueno, J., Shchukina, N., and Asensio-Ramos, A. (2004). A substantial amount of hidden magnetic energy in the quiet Sun. Nature, 430(6997), 326–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trujillo Bueno, J., Štěpán, J., and Casini, R. (2011). The Hanle effect of the hydrogen Lyα line for probing the magnetism of the solar transition region. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 738(1), L11 (5pp).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trujillo Bueno, J., Štěpán, J., and Belluzzi, L. (2012). The Lyα lines of H I and He II: A differential Hanle effect for exploring the magnetism of the solar transition region. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 746(1), L9 (5pp).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Unno, W. (1956). Line formation of a normal Zeeman triplet. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 8, 108.Google Scholar

Watanabe, H., Narukage, N., Kubo, M.et al. (2011). Ly-alpha polarimeter design for CLASP rocket experiment. In SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications. Bellingham WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics, p. 81480T.Google Scholar

Ariste, A. L., Leblanc, F., Casini, R.et al. (2012). Resonance scattering polarization in the magnetosphere of Mercury. Icarus, 220, 1104–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohren, C. and Huffman, D. (1998). Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles. New York: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cantor, B. A., Wolff, M. J., James, P. B., and Higgs, E. (1998). Regression of Martian north polar cap: 1990–1997 Hubble Space Telescope observations. Icarus, 136, 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clancy, R. T., Wolff, M. J., and Christensen, P. R. (2003). Mars aerosol studies with the MGS TES emission phase function observations: Optical depths, particle sizes, and ice cloud types versus latitude and solar longitude. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108, 5098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coffeen, D. L. (1979). Polarization and scattering characteristics in the atmospheres of Earth, Venus, and Jupiter. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 69, 1051–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coffeen, D. and Hansen, J. (1974). Polarization studies of planetary atmospheres. In Planets, Stars, and Nebular Studies with Photopolarimetry. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar

Dlugach, Z. and Petrova, E. (2003). Polarimetry of Mars in high-transparency periods: How reliable are the estimates of aerosol optical properties?Solar System Research, 37, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollfus, A. and Auriere, M. (1974). Optical polarimetry of planet Mercury. Icarus, 23, 465–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollfus, A. and Focas, J. (1969). La planete Mars: La nature de sa surface et les proprietes de son atmosphere, d’apres la polarisation de sa lumiere. Observations. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2, 63–74.Google Scholar

Dollfus, A., Auriere, M., and Santer, R. (1979). Wavelength dependence of polarization. XXXVII. Regional observations of Venus. The Astronomical Journal, 84(9), 1419–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollfus, A., Deschaps, M., and Ksanfomality, L. (1983). The surface texture of the Martian soil from Soviet spacecraft Mars 5 photopolarimeter. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 123, 225–237.Google Scholar

Dollfus, A., Bowell, E., and Ebisawa, S. (1984). The Martian dust storms of 1973: A polarimetric analysis. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 134, 343–353.Google Scholar

Dollfus, A., Ebisawa, S., and Crussaire, D. (1996). Hoods, mists, frosts, and ice caps at the poles of Mars. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101(E4), 9207–9226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ebisawa, S. and Dollfus, A. (1993). Dust in the Martian atmosphere: Polarimetric sensing. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 272, 671–686.Google Scholar

Fox, G., Code, A., Anderson, C.et al. (1997). Solar system observations by the Wisconsin Ultraviolet Photopolarimeter experiment. I. The first ultraviolet linear spectropolarimetry of Mars. The Astronomical Journal, 113, 1152–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gehrels, T., Gradie, J., Howes, M., and Vrba, F. (1979). Wavelength dependence of polarization. XXXIV. Observations of Venus. The Astronomical Journal, 84, 671–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gehrels, T., Landau, R., and Coyne, G. V. (1987). Mercury: Wavelength and longitude dependence of polarization. Icarus, 71, 386–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grinspoon, D., Polack, J., Sitton, B.et al. (1993). Probing Venus’s cloud structure with Galileo NIMS. Planetary and Space Science, 41(7), 515–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansen, J. E. and Arking, A. (1971). Clouds of Venus: Evidence for their nature. Science, 171, 669–672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hansen, J. E. and Hovenier, J. W. (1974). Interpretation of the polarization of Venus. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 31, 1137–1160.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hapke, B. (2012) Theory of Reflectance and Emittance Spectroscopy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, P. B., Clancy, R. T., Lee, S. W.et al. (1994). Monitoring Mars with the Hubble Space Telescope: 1990–1991 observations. Icarus, 109, 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kawabata, K. and Hansen, J. (1975). Interpretation of the variation of polarization over the disk of Venus. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 32, 1133–1139.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kawabata, K., Coffeen, D., Hansen, J.et al. (1980). Cloud and haze properties from Pioneer Venus polarimetry. Journal of Geophysical Research, 85(AI3), 8129–8140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaydash, V., Kreslavsky, M., Shkuratov, Yu. et al. (2006). Measurements of winds on Mars with Hubble Space Telescope images in 2003 opposition. Icarus, 185, 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kemp, G., Henson, G., Steiner, C., and Powell, E. (1987). The optical polarization of the Sun measured at a sensitivity of parts in ten million. Nature, 326(6110), 270–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knibbe, W., de Haan, J., Hovenier, J., and Travis, L. (1997). A biwavelength analysis of Pioneer Venus polarization observations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102(E5), 10945–10957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Können, G., Schoenmaker, A., and Tinbergen, J. (1993). A polarimetric search for ice crystals in the upper atmosphere of Venus. Icarus, 102, 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korablev, O., Fedorova, A., Bertaux, J.-L.et al. (2012). SPICAV IR acousto-optic spectrometer experiment on Venus Express. Planetary and Space Science, 65, 38–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ksanfomality, L., Harmon, J., Petrova, E.et al. (2007). Earth-based visible and near-IR imaging of Mercury. Space Science Reviews, 132, 351–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laven, P. (2004). Simulation of rainbows, coronas and glories using Mie theory and the Debye series. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 89, 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, P., Ebisawa, S., and Dollfus, A. (1990). Crystal clouds in the Martian atmosphere. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 240, 520–532.Google Scholar

Limaye, S. (1984). Morphology and movements of polarization features on Venus as seen in the Pioneer Orbiter Cloud Photopolarimeter data. Icarus, 57, 362–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lupishko, D. and Kiselev, N. (2004). Disk-integrated polarimetry of Mercury in 2000–2002. In Videen, G., Yatskiv, Ya., and Mishchenko, M., eds., Photopolarimetry in Remote Sensing. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 385–392.Google Scholar

Lyot, B. (1929). Recherches sur la polarisation de la lumière des planètes et de quelques substances terrestres. Annales de l’Observatoire de Paris, section de Meudon, 8, 1–161.Google Scholar

Marov, M. Y., Lystsev, V. T., Lebedev, V. N., Lukashevich, N. L., and Shari, V. P. (1980). The structure and microphysical properties of the Venus clouds: Venera 9, 10, and 11 data. Icarus, 44, 608–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mishchenko, M., Lacis, A., Carlson, B., and Travis, L. (1995). Nonsphericity of dust-like tropospheric aerosols: Implications for aerosol remote sensing and climate modeling. Geophysical Research Letters, 22, 1077–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mishchenko, M., Dlugach, J., Liu, L.et al. (2009). Direct solutions of the Maxwell equations explain opposition phenomena observed for high-albedo solar system objects. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 705, L118–L122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ovcharenko, A., Shkuratov, Y., Pinet, P., Cord, A., and Daydou, Y. (2002). Additional characterization of Martian regolith analogs used for spectral imaging by the facility of observatory Midi-Pyrenees. Microsymposium Vernadsky-Brown, 36, MS075.Google Scholar

Petrova, E. V. (1999). Mars aerosol optical thickness retrieved from measurements of the polarization inversion angle and the shape of dust particles. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 63, 667–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petrova, E. V. and Tishkovets, V. P. (2011). Light scattering by morphologically complex objects and opposition effects (a review). Solar System Research, 45(4), 304–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petrova, E., Shalygina, O., Markiewicz, W., and Almeida, M. (2013). VMC/VEX photometry at small phase angles: Glory and the properties of particles in the upper cloud layer of Venus. European Geosciences Union, General Assembly (EGU2013-7839).Google Scholar

Ragent, B. and Blamont, J. (1980). The structure of the clouds of Venus: Results of the Pioneer Venus nephelometer experiment. Journal of Geophysical Research, 85(A13), 8089–8105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ragent, B., Esposito, L., Tomasko, M.et al. (1985). Particulate matter in the Venus atmosphere. Advances in Space Research, 5, 85–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roggemann, M. C. and Welsh, B. M. (1996). Imaging Through Turbulence. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Rossi, L., Montmessin, F., Marcq, M.et al. (2013). Study of Venus’ cloud layers by polarimetry with SPICAV/Vex. European Planetary Science Congress 2013, 8, EPSC2013–504.Google Scholar

Santer, R., Deschaps, M., Ksanfomality, L., and Dollfus, A. (1985). Photopolarimetric analysis of the Martian atmosphere by Soviet MARS-5 orbiter. 1. White clouds and dust veils. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 150, 217–228.Google Scholar

Santer, R., Deschaps, M., Ksanfomality, L., and Dollfus, A. (1986). Photopolarimetric analysis of the Martian atmosphere by Soviet MARS-5 orbiter. 2. Limb and terminator measurements. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 158, 247–258.Google Scholar

Sato, M., Travis, L. D., and Kawabata, K. (1996). Photopolarimetry analysis of the Venus atmosphere in polar regions. Icarus, 124, 569–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shkuratov, Y. G. (1987). Negative polarization of sunlight scattered from celestial bodies: Interpretation of the wavelength dependence. Soviet Astronomy Letters, 13, 182–183.Google Scholar

Shkuratov, Y. G. and Opanasenko, N. V. (1992). Polarimetric and photometric study of the Moon: Telescope observation and laboratory simulation. 2. The positive polarization. Icarus, 99, 468–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shkuratov, Yu. and Zubko, E. (2008). Comment on “Modeling of opposition effects with ensembles of clusters: Interplay of various scattering mechanisms” by E. V. Petrova, V. P. Tishkovets, K. Jockers, 2007 [Icarus, 188, 233–245]. Icarus, 194, 850–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shkuratov, Y., Ovcharenko, A., Zubko, E.et al. (2002). The opposition effect and negative polarization of structurally simulated planetary regoliths. Icarus, 159, 396–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shkuratov, Y., Kreslavsky, M., Kaydash, V.et al. (2005). Hubble Space Telescope imaging polarimetry of Mars during the 2003 opposition. Icarus, 176, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shkuratov, Y., Bondarenko, S., Ovcharenko, A.et al. (2006). Comparative studies of the reflectance and degree of linear polarization of particulate surfaces and independently scattering particles. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 100, 340–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shkuratov, Y., Kaydash, V., Korokhin, V.et al. (2011). Optical measurements of the Moon as a tool to study its surface. Planetary and Space Science, 59, 1326–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sparks, W., Hough, J., and Bergeron, L. (2005). A search for chiral signatures on Mars. Astrobiology, 5, 737–748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sparks, W., Hough, J., Geremer, T., Robb, F., and Kolokolova, L. (2012). Remote sensing of chiral signatures on Mars. Planetary and Space Science, 72, 111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Starodubtseva, O. M. (1987). Temporal variations of polarized light on Venus. Astronomicheskii Tsirkulyar, 1511, 3 [in Russian].Google Scholar

Starodubtseva, O. M. (1991). Variability of polarized light of Venus from ground-based observations. In 22nd Lunar Planetary Science Conference. Houston: LPI, p. 1315.Google Scholar

Taylor, F. (2006). Venus before Venus Express. Planetary and Space Science, 54, 1249–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tishkovets, V. P. and Shkuratov, Y. G. (1982). Polarization properties of the surface and atmosphere of Mars. Soviet Astronomy, 26, 599–601.Google Scholar

Travis, L. D., Coffeen, D. L., Hansen, J. E.et al. (1979). Orbiter cloud photopolarimeter investigation. Science, 203, 781–785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Veverka, J., Helfenstein, P., Hapke, B., and Goguen, J. D. (1988). Photometry and polarimetry of Mercury. In Vilas, F., Chapman, C. R., and Matthews, M. S., eds., Mercury. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, pp. 37–58.Google Scholar

Wolff, M. and Clancy, R. (2003). Constraints on the size of Martian aerosols from Thermal Emission Spectrometer observations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108, 5097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolff, M. J., BellIII, J. F., James, P. B., Clancy, R. T., and Lee, S. W. (1999). Hubble Space Telescope observations of the Martian aphelion cloud belt prior to the Mars Pathfinder mission: Seasonal and interannual variations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104(E4), 9027–9041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, A. (1973). Are the clouds of Venus sulfuric acid?Icarus, 18, 564–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zubko, E., Shkuratov, Y., Mishchenko, M., and Videen, G. (2008). Light scattering in a finite multi-particle system. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 109, 2195–2206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akimov, L. A. and Shkuratov, Yu. G. (1983). Optical research on lunar soil samples of different degrees of maturity. Solar System Research, 17, 152–158.Google Scholar

Arago, F. (1858). Les Comètes. Paris: Gide Editeur.Google Scholar

Bandermann, L. W., Kemp, L. C., and Wolstencroft, R. D. (1972). Circular polarization of light scattered from rough surfaces. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 158, 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohren, C. F. and Huffman, D. R. (2004). Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.Google Scholar

Bowell, E. and Zellner, B. (1974). Polarizations of asteroids and satellites. In Gehrels, T., ed., Planets, Stars, and Nebulae Studied with Photopolarimetry. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, pp. 381–404.Google Scholar

Bowell, E., Dollfus, A., and Geake, J. (1972). Polarimetric properties of the Lunar surface and its interpretation. Part 5: Apollo 14 and Luna 16 lunar samples. Proceedings of the 3rd Lunar Science Conference. Houston, USA: LPI, pp. 3103–3126.Google Scholar

Burns, R. (1993). Mineralogical Applications of Crystal Field Theory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Degtyarev, V. and Kolokolova, L. (1992). Possible application of circular polarization for remote sensing of cosmic bodies. Earth, Moon, and Planets, 57, 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollfus, A. (1962). The polarization of moonlight. Chapter 18. In Kopal, Z., ed., Physics and Astronomy of the Moon. Academic Press Inc., pp. 131–139.Google Scholar

Dollfus, A. (1998). Lunar surface imaging polarimetry: I. Roughness and grain size. Icarus, 136, 69–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollfus, A. (1999). Lunar surface imaging polarimetry: II. Mare Fecunditatis and Messier. Icarus, 140, 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollfus, A. (2000). Lunar surface imaging polarimetry. III. Langrenus. Icarus, 146, 420–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollfus, A. and Bowell, E. (1971). Polarimetric properties of the lunar surface and interpretation. I. Telescope observation. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 10, 29–53.Google Scholar

Dollfus, A. and Titulaer, C. (1971). Polarimetric properties of the lunar surface and its interpretation. Part III. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 199–209.Google Scholar

Dzhapiashvili, V. P. and Korol, A. N. (1982). Polarimetric Atlas of the Moon. Tbilisi: Metsniereba.Google Scholar

Engelhardt, W., Hurrle, H., and Luft, E. (1976). Microimpact-induced changes of textural parameters and modal composition of the lunar regolith. Proceedings of the 7th Lunar Planetary Science Conference. Houston, USA: LPI, pp. 373–392.Google Scholar

Evsyukov, N. N., and Shestopalov, D. I. (1976). Polarimetric mapping of the Moon. Soviet Astronomy, 19, 772–775.Google Scholar

Fox, G., Code, A., Anderson, C.et al. (1998). Solar system observations by the Wisconsin Ultraviolet Photopolarimeter Experiment – III. The first ultraviolet spectropolarimetry of the Moon. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 298, 303–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grynko, E. and Shkuratov, Yu. (2003). Scattering matrix for semitransparent particles of different shapes in geometric optics approximation. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 78, 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grynko, E. S. and Shkuratov, Yu. G. (2007). Ray tracing sumulation of light scattering by spherical clusters consisting of particles with different shapes. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 106, 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hapke, B. (1971). Optical properties of the lunar surface. In Kopal, Z., ed., Physics and Astronomy of the Moon. New York: Academic Press, pp. 155–211.Google Scholar

Hapke, B. (2012). Theory of Reflectance and Emittance Spectroscopy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hapke, B. W., Nelson, R. M., and Smythe, W. D. (1974). The opposition effect of the moon: The contribution of coherent backscatter. Science, 260(5107), 509–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heiken, G. H., McKay, D. S., and Brown, R. W. (1974). Lunar deposits of possible pyroclastic origin. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 38, 1703–1718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaydash, V., Shkuratov, Y., and Videen, G. (2012). Phase-ratio imagery as a tool of lunar remote sensing. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 113, 2601–2607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kemp, J. C., Wolstencroft, R. D., and Swedlung, J. B. (1971). Circular polarization: Jupiter and other planets. Nature, 232, 165–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kornienko, Y. V., Shkuratov, Y. G., Bychinskii, V. I., and Stankevich, D. G. (1982). Correlation between albedo and polarization characteristics of the Moon – application of digital image processing. Soviet Astronomy, 26, 345–348.Google Scholar

Korokhin, V. V. and Velikodsky, Y. I. (2005). Parameters of the positive polarization maximum of the Moon: Mapping. Solar System Research, 39, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kvaratskhelia, O. I. (1988). Spectropolarimetry of the lunar surface and samples of the lunar soil. Bulletin of Abastumari Astrophysical Observatory, 64, 1–312.Google Scholar

Lipsky, Y. N. and Pospergelis, M. M. (1967). Several results of measuring the complete Stokes vector for lunar surface features. Astronomicheskii Zhurnal, 44, 410–412.Google Scholar

Lyot, B. (1929). Recherches sur la polarisation de la lumière des planètes et de quelques substances terrestres. Annales de l’Observatoire de Paris, section de Meudon, 8, 1–161.Google Scholar

Mishchenko, M., Dlugach, J., Liu, L. et al. (2009). Direct solutions of the Maxwell equations explain opposition phenomena observed for high-albedo solar system objects. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 705, L118–L122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muinonen, K. (1989). Electromagnetic scattering by two interacting dipoles. In Proceedings of the 1989 URSI International Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology (Stockholm), pp. 428–430.Google Scholar

Novikov, V. V. (1980). Polarimetry as a tool of remote sensing selenochemistry. Trudy Shternberg Gosudarstvennogo Astronomicheskogo Instituta Moscow, 50, 135–149.Google Scholar

Opanasenko, N. V. and Shkuratov, Y. G. (1994). Results of simultaneous polarimetry and photometry of the Moon. Solar System Research, 28, 398–417.Google Scholar

Opanasenko, N. V., Dolukhanyan, A. A., Shkuratov, Y. G.et al. (1994). Polarization map of the Moon at the minimum of the negative branch. Solar System Research, 28, 98–105.Google Scholar

Opanasenko, N. V., Opanasenko, A. N., Shkuratov, Y. G.et al. (2009). The negative polarization parameters of the light scattered by the lunar surface: Mapping. Solar System Research, 43, 210–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Opanasenko, N., Shkuratov, Y., Kaydash, V.et al. (2013). Preliminary mapping negative polarization of the lunar nearside. In Proceedings of the 44th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Houston: LPI, p. 1354.Google Scholar

Shestopalov, D. I., McFadden, L. A., Golubeva, L. F., Khomenko, V. M., and Gasanova, L. O. (2008). Vestoid surface composition from analysis of faint absorption bands in visible reflectance spectra. Icarus, 195, 649–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shkuratov, Y. G. (1981). Connection between the albedo and polarization properties of the Moon. Fresnel component of reflected light. Soviet Astronomy, 25(4), 490–494.Google Scholar

Shkuratov, Y. G. (1985). On the origin of the opposition effect and negative polarization for cosmic bodies with solid surface. In Astronomicheskii Circular, No. 1400. Moscow: Sternberg State Astronomy Institute, pp. 3–6.Google Scholar

Shkuratov, Y. G. (1987). Negative polarization of sunlight scattered from celestial bodies: Interpretation of the wavelength dependence. Soviet Astronomy Letters, 13, 182–183.Google Scholar

Shkuratov, Y. (1988). Diffraction model of the brightness surge of complex structure surfaces. Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies, 4, 33–39.Google Scholar

Shkuratov, Y. G. and Basilevsky, A. T. (1981). An attempt at mapping the parameter of surface micro porosity of lunar regolith: Correlation between albedo and polarization properties of the Moon. In Proceedings of the 12th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Houston, USA: LPI, pp. 1981–1983.Google Scholar

Shkuratov, Y. and Grynko, Y. (2005). Scattering by semitransparent particles of different shapes and media consisting of these particles in geometric optics approximation: Consequences for photometry and spectroscopy of the planetary regoliths. Icarus, 173, 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shkuratov, Y. G. and Opanasenko, N. V. (1990). On the limb polarimetric effect in the Moon discovered by Lyot. Astronomicheskii Vestnik, 24(4), 333–336 [in Russian].Google Scholar

Shkuratov, Y. G. and Opanasenko, N. V. (1992). Polarimetric and photometric study of the Moon: Telescope observation and laboratory simulation. 2. The positive polarization. Icarus, 99, 468–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shkuratov, Y. G., Opanasenko, N. V., and Kreslavsky, M. A. (1992a). Polarimetric and photometric properties of the Moon: Telescope observation and laboratory simulation. 1. The negative polarization. Icarus, 95, 283–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shkuratov, Y. G., Kreslavsky, M. A., and Opanasenko, N. V. (1992b). Analysis of a mechanism of negative polarization of light scattered by the surfaces of atmosphereless celestial bodies. Solar System Research, 26, 33–38.Google Scholar

Shkuratov, Y., Muinonen, K., Bowell, E.et al. (1994). A critical review of theoretical models for the negative polarization of light scattered by atmosphereless solar system bodies. Earth, Moon, and Planets, 65, 201–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shkuratov, Y., Ovcharenko, A., Zubko, E. et al. (2002). The opposition effect and negative polarization of structurally simulated planetary regoliths. Icarus, 159, 396–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shkuratov, Yu., Ovcharenko, A., Zubko, E.et al. (2004). The negative polarization of light scattered from particulate surfaces and of independently scattering particles. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 88, 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shkuratov, Y., Opanasenko, N., Zubko, E.et al. (2007). Multispectral polarimetry as a tool to investigate texture and chemistry of lunar regolith particles. Icarus, 187, 406–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shkuratov, Yu., Opanasenko, N., Opanasenko, A.et al. (2008). Polarimetric mapping of the Moon at a phase angle nearby minimum of polarization degree. Icarus, 198, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shkuratov, Y., Kaydash, V., Korokhin, V.et al. (2011). Optical measurements of the Moon as a tool to study its surface. Planetary and Space Science, 59, 1326–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stankevich, D., Istomina, L., Shkuratov, Yu., and Videen, G. (2007). The coherent backscattering effects in a random medium as calculated using a ray tracing technique for large non-transparent spheres. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 106, 509–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sterzik, M. F., Bagnulo, S., and Palle, E. (2012). Biosignatures as revealed by spectropolarimetry of Earthshine. Nature, 483 (7387), 64–66, doi: 10.1038/nature10778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Takashi, J., Iton, Y., Akitaya, H. et al. (2013). Phase variation of Earthshine polarization spectra. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 65, 38–1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Umov, N. (1905). Chromatische depolarisation durch Lichtzerstreuung. Physikalische Zeitschrift, 6, 674–676.Google Scholar

Wolff, M. (1980). Theory and application of the polarization-albedo rules. Icarus, 44, 780–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zellner, B., Leake, M., Lebertre, T., Duseaux, M., and Dollfus, A. (1977). The asteroid albedo scale. I. Laboratory polarimetry of meteorites. Proceedings of the 8th Lunar Science Conference. Houston, USA: LPI, pp. 1091–1110.Google Scholar

Zubko, E., Kimura, H., Shkuratov, Y.et al. (2009). Effect of absorption on light scattering by agglomerated debris particles. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 110, 1741–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zubko, E., Videen, G., Shkuratov, Y., Muinonen, K., and Yamamoto, T. (2011). The Umov effect for single irregularly shaped particles with size comparable with wavelength. Icarus, 212, 403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, A. L., Baker, L. R., Beshore, E.et al. (1975). Imaging photopolarimeter experiment on Pioneer 11. Science, 188, 468–472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bar-Nun, A., Kleinfeld, I., and Ganor, E. (1988). Shape and optical properties of aerosols formed by photolysis of acetylene, ethylene, and hydrogen cyanide. Journal of Geophysical Research, 93, 8383–8387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bar-Nun, A., Dimitrov, V., and Tomasko, M. (2008). Titan’s aerosols: Comparison between our model and DISR findings. Planetary and Space Science, 56, 708–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrado-Izagirre, N., Sánchez-Lavega, A., Pérez-Hoyos, S., and Hueso, R. (2008). Jupiter’s polar clouds and waves from Cassini and HST images: 1993–2006. Icarus, 194, 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bazzon, A., Schmid, H. M., and Buenzli, E. (2010). HST observations of the limb polarization of Titan. In Boccaletti, A., ed., Proceedings of the Conference In the Spirit of Lyot 2010: Direct Detection of Exoplanets and Circumstellar Disks. October 25–29, 2010. University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France.Google Scholar

Beebe, R. F., Suggs, R. M., and Little, T. (1986). Seasonal north-south asymmetry in solar radiation incident on Jupiter’s atmosphere. Icarus, 66(2), 359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braak, C. J., de Haan, J. F., van der Mee, C. V. M., Hovenier, J. W., and Travis, L. D. (2001). Parameterized scattering matrices for small particles in planetary atmospheres. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 69, 585–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braak, C. J., de Haan, J. F., Hovenier, J. W., and Travis, L. D. (2002). Galileo photopolarimetry of Jupiter at 678.5 nm. Icarus, 157, 401–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buenzli, E. and Schmid, H. M. (2009). A grid of polarization models for Rayleigh scattering planetary atmospheres. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 504, 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cabane, M., Chassefiere, E., and Israel, G. (1992). Formation and growth of photochemical aerosols in Titan’s atmosphere. Icarus, 96, 176–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cabane, M., Rannou, P., Chassefiere, E., and Israel, G. (1993). Fractal aggregates in Titan’s atmosphere. Planetary and Space Science, 41, 257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coffeen, D. L. (1974a). Optical polarimeters in space. In Gehrels, T, ed., Planets, Stars, and Nebulae Studied with Photopolarimetry. Tucson AZ: University of Arizona Press, pp. 189–217.Google Scholar

Coffeen, D. L. (1974b). Optical polarization measurements of Jupiter atmosphere at 103 degrees phase angle. Journal of Geophysical Research, 79, 3645–3652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dlugach, J. A. and Mishchenko, M. I. (2004). The effect of particle shape on microphysical properties of Jovian aerosols retrieved from ground-based spectropolarimetric observations. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 88, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dlugach, J. M. and. Mishchenko, M. I. (2008). Photopolarimetry of planetary atmospheres: What observational data are essential for a unique retrieval of aerosol microphysics?Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 384, 64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollfus, A. (1978). Optical reflectance polarimetry of Saturn’s globe and rings. I. Measurements on the B ring. Icarus, 37, 404–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollfus, A. (1979). Optical reflectance polarimetry of Saturn’s globe and rings. II. Interpretations for the B Ring. Icarus, 40, 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doose, L. R. (1976). Light scattering properties of Jupiter’s red spot. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ.Google Scholar

Draine, B. T. (1988). The discrete-dipole approximation and its application to interstellar graphite grains. The Astrophysical Journal, 333, 848–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fimmel, R. O., Van Allen, J., and Burgess, E. (1980). Pioneer First to Jupiter, Saturn and Beyond. Washington DC: NASA SP-446.Google Scholar

Fountain, J. W., Coffeen, D. L., Doose, L. R.et al. (1974). Jupiter’s clouds – Equatorial plumes and other cloud forms in Pioneer-10 images. Science, 184, 1279–1281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Friedson, A. J., Wong, A.-S., and Yung, Y. L. (2002). Models for polar haze formation in Jupiter’s stratosphere. Icarus, 158(2), 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gehrels, T., Herman, B. M., and Owen, T. (1969). Wavelength dependence of polarization XIV. Atmosphere of Jupiter. The Astronomical Journal, 74, 190–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gehrels, T., Coffeen, D., Tomasko, M.et al. (1974). The imaging photopolarimeter experiment on Pioneer 10. Science, 183, 318–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gehrels, T., Baker, L. R., Beshore, E.et al. (1980). Imaging photopolarimeter on Pioneer Saturn. Science, 207, 434–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hall, J. S. and Riley, L. A. (1969). Polarization studies of Jupiter and Saturn. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 26, 920–923.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, J. S. and Riley, L. A. (1976). A polarimetric search for fine structure on Jupiter’s disk. Icarus, 29, 231–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansen, J. E. and Hovenier, J. W. (1974). Interpretation of the polarization of Venus. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 31, 1137–1160.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hord, C. W., West, R. A., Simmons, K. E.et al. (1979). Photometric observations of Jupiter at 2400 Å. Science, 806, 956–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joos, F. and Schmid, H. M. (2007). Limb polarization of Uranus and Neptune. II. Spectropolarimetric observations. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 463, 1201–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karkoschka, E. and Tomasko, M. (2005). Saturn’s vertical and latitudinal cloud structure 1991–2004 from HST imaging in 30 filters. Icarus, 179, 195–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karkoschka, E. and Tomasko, M. (2009). The haze and methane distributions on Uranus from HST-STIS spectroscopy. Icarus, 202, 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kawata, Y. (1978). Circular polarization of sunlight reflected by planetary atmospheres. Icarus, 33, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kemp, K. G., Rudy, R. J., Lebofsky, M. J., and Reike, G. H. (1978). Near infrared polarization studies of Saturn and Jupiter. Icarus, 35(2), 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, S. J., Drossart, P., and Caldwell, J. (1991). The 2-µm polar haze of Jupiter. Icarus, 91, 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korokhin, V. V., Beletskii, S. A., and Velikodsky, Yu. I. (2000). The experience of application of CCD-photodetectors at the Astronomical Observatory of the Kharkiv National University. Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies, 16(1), 63–67.Google Scholar

Kuiper, G. P. (1944). Titan: A satellite with atmosphere. The Astrophysical Journal, 100, 378–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lane, A. L., Hord, C. W., West, R. A.et al. (1982). Photopolarimetry from Voyager 2. Preliminary Results on Saturn, Titan and the Rings. Science, 215, 537–543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lavvas, P., Yelle, R. V., and Vuitton, V. (2009). The detached haze layer in Titan’s mesosphere. Icarus, 201, 626–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lillie, C. F., Hord, C. W., Pang, K., Coffeen, D. L., and Hansen, J. E. (1977). The Voyager mission photopolarimeter experiment. Space Science Reviews, 21, 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyot, B. (1929). Recherches sur le polarization de la lumière des planèts et de quelques substances terrestres. Annales de l'Observatoire de Paris, section de Meudon VIII (in English, NASA TT F-187).Google Scholar

Mallama, A., Krobusek, B. F., Collins, D. A. (2000). The radius of Jupiter and its polar haze. Icarus, 144, 99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mishchenko, M. I. (1990). Physical properties of the upper tropospheric aerosols in the equatorial region of Jupiter. Icarus, 84, 296–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morozhenko, A. V. and Yanovitskii, E. G. (1973). The optical properties of Venus and the Jovian planets. I. The atmosphere of Jupiter according to polarimetric observations. Icarus, 18, 583–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owen, T. and Terrile, R. J. (1981). Colors on Jupiter. Journal of Geophysical Research, 86, 8797–8814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pellicori, S. F., Russell, E. E., and Watts, L. A. (1973). Pioneer imaging photopolarimeter optical system. Applied Optics, 12, 1246–1258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pope, S. K., Tomasko, M. G., Williams, M. S.et al. (1992). Clouds of ammonia ice: Laboratory measurements of the single-scattering properties. Icarus, 100, 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porco, C. C., West, R. A., Squyres, S.et al. (2004). Cassini imaging science: Instrument characteristics and anticipated scientific investigations at Saturn. Space Science Reviews, 115, 363–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pryor, W. R. and Hord, C. W. (1991). A study of photopolarimeter system UV absorption data on Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune: Implications for auroral haze formation. Icarus, 91, 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pryor, W. R., West, R. A., Simmons, K. E., and Delitsky, M. (1992). High-phase-angle observations of Neptune at 2650-Angstrom and 7500-Angstrom – Haze structure and particle properties. Icarus, 99, 302–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rages, K. and Pollack, J. B. (1981). High phase angle Voyager images of Titan’s main aerosol layer. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 13, 703.Google Scholar

Rannou, P., McKay, C. P., and Lorenz, R. D. (2003). A model of Titan’s haze of fractal aerosols constrained by multiple observations. Planetary and Space Science, 51, 963–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, E. E., Brown, F. G., Chandos, R. A.et al. (1992). Galileo photopolarimeter/radiometer experiment. Space Science Reviews, 60, 531–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sato, T. M., Satoh, T., and Kasaba, Y. (2013). Retrieval of Jovian cloud structure from the Cassini ISS limb-darkening data I. Continuum scattering phase functions for cloud and haze in the South Tropical Zone. Icarus, 222, 100–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmid, H. M., Joos, F., Buenzli, E., and Gisler, D. (2011). Long-slit polarimetry of Jupiter and Saturn. Icarus, 212(2), 701–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shalygina, O. S., Korokhin, V. V., Starukhina, L. V.et al. (2008). The north-south asymmetry of polarization of Jupiter: The causes of seasonal variations. Solar System Research, 42(1), 8–17, doi: 10.1134/S0038094608010024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shalygina, O. S., Shalygin, E. V., Korokhin, V. V., and Velikodsky, Yu. I. (2011). Appearance of linear polarization at polar regions of Jupiter. Proceedings of the 42nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Houston, USA: LPI.Google Scholar

Smith, P. H. and Tomasko, M. G. (1984). Photometry and polarimetry of Jupiter at large phase angles. II. Polarimetry of the South Tropical Zone, South Equatorial Belt, and the Polar Regions from the Pioneer 10 and 11 Missions. Icarus, 58, 35–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sromovsky, L. A. and Fry, P. M. (2010). The source of widespread 3-μm absorption in Jupiter’s clouds: Constraints from 2000 Cassini VIMS observations. Icarus, 210, 230–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Starodubtseva, O. M. and Tejfel, V. G. (1984). Light polarization in the polar regions of Jupiter. Solar System Research, 18(3), 115–122.Google Scholar

Starodubtseva, O. M., Akimov, L. A., and Korokhin, V. V. (1997). Temporal changes in the north-south asymmetry of polarized light of Jupiter may be associated with the comet SL9 visit to the Jovian system. Planetary and Space Science, 45, 1183–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Starodubtseva, O. M., Akimov, L. A., and Korokhin, V. V. (2002). Seasonal variation of the north-south asymmetry of polarized light of Jupiter. Icarus, 157(2), 419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoll, C. P. (1980). Polarimetry of Jupiter at large phase angles. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ.Google Scholar

Swedlund, J. B., Kemp, J. C., and Wolstencroft, R. D. (1973). Circular polarization of Saturn. The Astrophysical Journal, 178, 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tejfel, V. G. (1985). Polar regions of Jupiter and Saturn. Solar System Research, 19(1), 33–44.Google Scholar

Tomasko, M. G. (1980). Preliminary results of polarimetry and photometry of Titan at large phase angles from Pioneer 11. Journal of Geophysical Research, 85, 5937–5942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomasko, M. G. and Doose, L. R. (1984). Polarimetry and photometry of Saturn from Pioneer 11: Observations and constraints on the distribution and properties of cloud and aerosol particles. Icarus, 58, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomasko, M. G. and Smith, P. H. (1982). Photometry and polarimetry of Titan: Pioneer 11 observations and their implications for aerosol properties. Icarus, 51, 65–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomasko, M. G., Buchhauser, D., Bushroe, M.et al. (2002). The Descent Imager/Spectral Radiometer (DISR) experiment on the Huygens entry probe of Titan. Space Science Reviews, 104, 469–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomasko, M. G., Archinal, B., Becker, T.et al. (2005). Rain, winds and haze during the Huygens probe’s descent to Titan’s surface. Nature, 438, 765–778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tomasko, M. G., Doose, L., Engel, S.et al. (2008). A model of Titan’s aerosols based on measurements made inside the atmosphere. Planetary and Space Science, 56, 669–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomasko, M. G., Doose, L. R., Dafoe, L. E., and See, C. (2009). Limits on the size of aerosols from measurements of linear polarization in Titan’s atmosphere. Icarus, 204, 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Veverka, J. (1973). Titan: Polarimetric evidence for an optically thick atmosphere?Icarus, 18, 657–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wauben, W. M. F., de Haan, J. F., and Hovenier, J. W. (1993). Influence of particle shape on the polarized radiation in planetary atmospheres. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 50, 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, R. A. (1979). Spatially resolved methane band photometry of Jupiter. I. Absolute reflectivity and center-to-limb variations in the 6190-, 7250-, and 8900-A bands. Icarus, 38, 12–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, R. A. (1988). Voyager 2 imaging eclipse observations of the Jovian high altitude haze. Icarus, 75, 381–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, R. A. (1991). Optical properties of aggregate particles whose outer diameter is comparable to the wavelength. Applied Optics, 30, 5316–5324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

West, R. A. and Smith, P. H. (1991). Evidence for aggregate particles in the atmospheres of Titan and Jupiter. Icarus, 90, 330–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, R. A. and Tomasko, M. G. (1980). Spatially resolved methane band photometry of Jupiter. III. Cloud vertical structures for several axisymmetric bands and the great red spot. Icarus, 41, 278–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, R. A., Tomasko, M. G., Smith, B. A.et al. (1982). Spatially resolved methane band photometry of Saturn. I. Absolute reflectivity and center-to-limb variations in the 6190, 7250 and 8900 Å Bands. Icarus, 51, 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, R. A., Sato, M., Hart, H.et al. (1983a). Photometry and polarimetry of Saturn at 2640 and 7500 Å. Journal of Geophysical Research, 88, 8679–8697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, R. A., Lane, A. L., Hart, H.et al. (1983b). Voyager 2 photopolarimeter observations of Titan. Journal of Geophysical Research, 88, 8699–8708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, R. A., Orton, G. S., Draine, B. T., and Hubbell, E. A. (1989). Infrared absorption features for tetrahedral ammonia ice crystals. Icarus, 80, 220–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, R. A., Baines, K. H., Friedson, J. A.et al. (2004). Jovian clouds and haze. In Bagenal, F., Dowling, T., and McKinnon, W., eds., Jupiter the Planet, Satellites and Magnetosphere. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

West, R. A., Baines, K. H., Karkoschka, E., and Sánchez-Lavega, A. (2009). Clouds and aerosols in Saturn’s atmosphere. In Dougherty, M., Esposito, L. W., and, Krimigis, S. M., eds., Saturn from Cassini/Huygens. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

West, R. W., Knowles, B., Birath, E.et al. (2010). In-flight calibration of the Cassini imaging science sub-system cameras. Planetary and Space Science, 58, 1475–1488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolstencroft, R. D. (1976). The circular polarization of the light from Jupiter. Icarus, 29, 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Afanasiev, V. L. and Amirkhanyan, V. R. (2012). Technique of polarimetric observations of faint objects at the 6-m BTA telescope. Astrophysical Bulletin, 67, 438–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Afanasiev, V. L. and Moiseev, A. V. (2011). Scorpio on the 6 m telescope: Current state and perspectives for spectroscopy of galactic and extragalactic objects. Baltic Astronomy, 20, 363–370.Google Scholar

Afanasiev, V. L., Rosenbush, V. K., and Kiselev, N. N. (2014). Polarimetry of Uranian satellites at the 6-m BTA telescope. Astrophysical Bulletin, 69(2), 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albers, S. (2008). Index of /albers/sos/saturn/Iapetus. Available online at: http://laps.noaa.gov/albers/sos/saturn/iapetus/ (accessed January 12, 2015).Google Scholar

Avramchuk, V. V. and Shavlovskij, V. I. (1998). Microstructure and properties of particles on the surface of Callisto. Analysis of phase variations in brightness. Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies, 14, 1–11.Google Scholar

Avramchuk, V. V., Rosenbush, V. K., and Bul’ba, T. P. (2007). Photometric study of the major satellites of Uranus. Solar System Research, 41, 186–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bagenal, F., Dowling, T. E., and McKinnon, W. B., eds. (2004). Jupiter. The planet, satellites and magnetosphere. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bagnulo, S., Belskaya, I., Muinonen, K.et al. (2008). Discovery of two distinct polarimetric behaviours of trans-Neptunian objects. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 491, L33–L36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bagnulo, S., Belskaya, I., Boehnhardt, H.et al. (2011). Polarimetry of small bodies of the solar system with large telescopes. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 112, 2059–2067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belskaya, I. N., Bagnulo, S., Barucci, M. A.et al. (2010). Polarimetry of Centaurs (2060) Chiron, (5145) Pholus and (10199) Chariklo. Icarus, 210, 472–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belskaya, I. N., Bagnulo, S., Stinson, A.et al. (2012). Polarimetry of trans-Neptunian objects (136472) Makemake and (90482) Orcus. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 547, 5pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergstralh, J. T., Miner, E. D., and Matthews, M. S., eds. (1991). Uranus. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackburn, D. G., Buratti, B. J., Ulrich, R., and Mosher, J. A. (2010). Solar phase curves and phase integrals for the leading and trailing hemispheres of Iapetus from the Cassini Visual Infrared Mapping Spectrometer. Icarus, 209, 738–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackburn, D. G., Buratti, B. J., and Rivera-Valentin, E. G. (2012). Exploring the impact of thermal segregation on Dione through a bolometric bond albedo map. In Proceedings of the 43rd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Houston TX: LPI, LPI Contribution, No. 1659, id. 1536.Google Scholar

Botvinova, V. V. and Kucherov, V. A. (1980). Multicolour polarimetry of Galilean satellites of Jupiter. Astrometriia i Astrofizika, 41, 59–63 [in Russian].Google Scholar

Buratti, B. J. (1991). Ganymede and Callisto: Surface textural dichotomies and photometric analysis. Icarus, 92, 312–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buratti, B. J. and Mosher, J. A. (1995). The dark side of Iapetus: Additional evidence for an exogenous origin. Icarus, 115, 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buratti, B. J. and Thomas, P. C. (2007). Planetary satellites. In McFadden, L.-A., Weissman, P., and Johnson, T., eds., Encyclopedia of the Solar System. Academic Press, pp. 365–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chigladze, R. A. (1989). Investigation of the polarimetric properties of the Galilean satellites of Jupiter and planet Uranus. Ph.D. thesis. Abastumany Astrophys. Obs. [in Russian].Google Scholar

Clark, R. N., Cruikshank, D. P., Jaumann, R.et al. (2012). The surface composition of Iapetus: Mapping results from Cassini VIMS. Icarus, 218, 831–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, G. and Johnson, T. (2007). Ganymede and Callisto. In McFadden, L.-A., Weissman, P., and Johnson, T., eds., Encyclopedia of the Solar System. Academic Press, pp. 449–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cruikshank, D. P., Brown, R. H., and Calvin, W. (1998). Ices on the satellites of Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus, In Schmitt, B., Bergh, C., and Festou, M., eds., Solar System Ices. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 579–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denk, T., Neukum, G., Roatsch, T. et al. (2010). Iapetus: Unique surface properties and a global color dichotomy from Cassini Imaging. Science, 327, 435–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollfus, A. (1975). Optical polarimetry of the Galilean satellites of Jupiter. Icarus, 25, 416–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollfus, A. (1984). The Saturn ring particles from optical reflectance polarimetry. In CNES Planetary Rings (SEE N85-26473 15–91). CNES, pp. 121–143.Google Scholar

Dollfus, A. and Zellner, B. (1979). Optical polarimetry of asteroids and laboratory samples. In Gehrels, T., ed., Asteroids. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, pp. 170–183.Google Scholar

Ejeta, C., Boehnhardt, H., Bagnulo, S., and Tozzi, G. P. (2012). Spectro-polarimetry of the bright side of Saturn’s moon Iapetus. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 537, A23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ejeta, C., Boehnhardt, H., Bagnulo, S.et al. (2013a). Polarization of Saturn’s moon Iapetus. II. Comparison of the dark and the bright sides. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 549, A61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ejeta, C., Muinonen, K., Boehnhardt, H.et al. (2013b). Polarization of Saturn’s moon Iapetus. III. Models of the bright and the dark sides. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 554, A117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, F. A. and Cook, A. F. (1974). Photometry of Saturn’s satellites: The opposition effect of Iapetus at maximum light and the variability of Titan. Icarus, 23, 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geake, J. E. and Geake, M. (1990). A remote sensing method for sub-wavelength grains on planetary surfaces by optical polarimetry. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 245, 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gradie, J. and Zellner, B. (1973). A polarimetric survey of the Galilean satellites. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 5, 404–405.Google Scholar

Gudipati, M. S. and Castillo-Rogez, J., eds. (2012). The Science of Solar System Ices. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Hapke, B. (1986). Bidirectional reflectance spectroscopy: VI. The extinction coefficient and opposition effect. Icarus, 67, 264–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hapke, B. W. (2002). Bidirectional reflectance spectroscopy. 5. The coherent backscatter opposition effect and anisotropic scattering. Icarus, 157, 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, A. W., Young, J. W., Contreiras, L.et al. (1989). Phase relations of high-albedo asteroids: The unusual opposition brightening of 44 Nysa and 64 Angelina. Icarus, 81, 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heiles, C. (2000). 9286 stars: An agglomeration of stellar polarization catalogs. The Astronomical Journal, 119, 923–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helfenstein, P., Currier, N., Clark, B.et al. (1998). Galileo observations of Europa’s opposition effect. Icarus, 135, 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hough, J. (2011). High sensitivity polarimetry: Techniques and applications. In Mishchenko, M. I., Yatskiv, Ya. S., Rosenbush, V. K., and Videen, G., eds., Polarimetric Detection, Characterization, and Remote Sensing. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, pp. 177–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, P. E., Kemp, J. C., King, R., Parker, T. E., and Barbour, M. S. (1980). New results from optical polarimetry of Saturn rings. Nature, 283, 146–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnston, W. R. (2013). TNO and centaur diameters, albedos, and densities, V1.0, EAR-A-COMPIL-5-TNOCENALB-V1.0, NASA Planetary Data System. Available online at: www.johnstonsarchive.net/astro/tnodiam.html (accessed January 15, 2015).Google Scholar

Kiselev, N., Rosenbush, V., Velichko, F., and Zaitsev, S. (2009). Polarimetry of the Galilean satellites and Jupiter near opposition. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 110, 1713–1718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kulyk, I. (2012). Brightness and polarization opposition effects at low phase angles of the Saturnian satellites Tethys, Dione, and Rhea. Planetary and Space Science, 73, 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lockwood, G. W. (1983). Photometry of planets and satellites. In Genet, R. M., ed., Solar System Photometry Handbook. Richmond: Willmann-Bell, Inc.Google Scholar

Lumme, K. and Muinonen, K. O. (1993). A two-parameter system for linear polarization of some solar system objects. In IAU Symposium 160: Asteroids, Comets, Meteors, LPI Contribution 810. Houston: LPI, pp. 194–197.Google Scholar

Lyot, B. (1929). Recherches sur la polarisation de la lumière des planètes et de quelques substances terrestres. Annales de l'Observatoire de Paris, section de Meudon, 8(1). English translation: Research on the polarization of light from planets and from some terrestrial substances, NASA Tech. Transl. NASA TT F−187, 1964, Washington, DC, 144pp.Google Scholar

Mackowski, D. W. and Mishchenko, M. I. (2011). A multiple sphere T-matrix Fortran code for use on parallel computer clusters. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 112, 2182–2192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, T. Z., Goguen, J. D., Travis, L. D.et al. (2000). Galileo PPR polarimetric phase curves for the Galilean satellites. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 32, 1069.Google Scholar

McCarthy, M. F. (1980). New techniques in stellar photometry and polarimetry. Ricerche Astronomiche Specola Vaticana, 10.Google Scholar

Miner, E. D. (1998). Uranus: The Planet, Rings, and Satellites. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Mishchenko, M. I. (1993). On the nature of the polarization opposition effect exhibited by Saturn’s rings. The Astrophysical Journal, 411, 351–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mishchenko, M. I., Luck, J. -M., and Nieuwenhuizen, Th. M. (2000). Full angular profile of the coherent polarization opposition effect. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 17, 888–891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mishchenko, M., Tishkovets, V., and Litvinov, P. (2002). Exact results of the vector theory of coherent backscattering from discrete random media: An overview. In Videen, G. and Kocifaj, M., eds., Optics of Cosmic Dust. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 239–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mishchenko, M. I., Rosenbush, V. K., and Kiselev, N. N. (2006). Weak localization of electromagnetic waves and opposition phenomena exhibited by high-albedo atmosphereless solar system objects. Applied Optics, 45, 4459–4463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mishchenko, M. I., Dlugach, J. M., Liu, L.et al. (2009). Direct solutions of the Maxwell equations explain opposition phenomena observed for high-albedo Solar system objects. The Astrophysical Journal, 705, L118–L122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mishchenko, M. I., Rosenbush, V. K., Kiselev, N. N.et al. (2010). Polarimetric Remote Sensing of Solar System Objects. Kyiv: Akademperiodika.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mishchenko, M. I., Tishkovets, V. P., Travis, L. D.et al. (2011). Electromagnetic scattering by a morphologically complex object: Fundamental concepts and common misconceptions. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 112, 671–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, J. M., Chapman, C. R., Bierhaus, E. B.et al. (2004). Callisto. In Bagenal, F., Dowling, T. E., and McKinnon, W. B., eds., Jupiter. The Planet, Satellites and Magnetosphere. Cambridge University Press, pp. 397–426.Google Scholar

Morrison, D. and Morrison, N. D. (1977). Photometry of the Galilean satellites. In Burns, J. A., ed., Planetary Satellites. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, pp. 363–378.Google Scholar

Muinonen, K. and Videen, G. (2012). A phenomenological single scatterer for studies of complex particulate media. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 113, 2385–2390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muinonen, K., Videen, G., Zubko, E., and Shkuratov, Yu. (2002). Numerical techniques for backscattering by random media. In Videen, G. and Kocifaj, M., eds., Optics of Cosmic Dust. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muinonen, K., Tyynelä, J., Zubko, E., and Videen, G. (2010). Scattering parameterization for interpreting asteroid polarimetric and photometric phase effects. Earth, Planets and Space, 62, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muinonen, K., Mishchenko, M. I., Dlugach, J. M.et al. (2012). Coherent backscattering verified numerically for a finite volume of spherical particles. The Astrophysical Journal, 760, 118–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Naghizadeh-Khouei, J. and Clarke, D. (1993). On the statistical behaviour of the position angle of linear polarization. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 274, 968–974.Google Scholar

Nelson, M. L., Britt, D. T., and Lebofsky, L. F. (1993). Review of asteroid compositions. In Lewis, J. S., Matthews, M. S., and Guerrieri, M. L., eds., Resources of Near-Earth Space. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press, pp. 493–522.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. M., Smythe, W. D., Hapke, B. W., and Hale, A. S. (2002). Low phase angle laboratory studies of the opposition effect: Search for wavelength dependence. Planetary Space Science, 50, 849–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noland, M., Veverka, J., Morrison, D.et al. (1974). Six-color photometry of Iapetus, Titan, Rhea, Dione and Tethys. Icarus, 23, 334–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patat, F. and Romaniello, M. (2006). Error analysis for dual-beam optical linear polarimetry. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 118, 146–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petrova, E. V. and Tishkovets, V. P. (2011a). Light scattering by morphologically complex objects and opposition effects (a review). Solar System Research, 45, 304–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petrova, E. V. and Tishkovets, V. P. (2011b). Light scattering by aggregates of varying porosity and the opposition phenomena observed in the low-albedo particulate media. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 112, 2226–2233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petrova, E. V., Tishkovets, V. P., and Jockers, K. (2007). Modeling of opposition effects with ensembles of clusters: Interplay of various scattering mechanisms. Icarus, 188, 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rathbun, J. A., Rodriguez, N. J., and Spencer, J. R. (2010). Galileo PPR observations of Europa: Hotspot detection limits and surface thermal properties. Icarus, 210, 763–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbush, V. K. (2002). The phase-angle and longitude dependence of polarization for Callisto. Icarus, 159, 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbush, V. K. (2006). The scattered light properties of small Solar System bodies. Habilitation dissertation, Main Astronomical Observatory of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv.Google Scholar

Rosenbush, V. (2012). Polarimetry of atmosphereless Solar System bodies. Available online at: www.polarisation.eu/projectdir/Warsaw-Rosenbush.pdf (accessed January 29, 2015).Google Scholar

Rosenbush, V. K. and Avramchuk, V. V. (1999). New polarimetric effects observed for the Galilean satellites of Jupiter. Solar System Research, 33, 267–277.Google Scholar

Rosenbush, V. K. and Kiselev, N. N. (2005). Polarization opposition effect for the Galilean satellites of Jupiter. Icarus, 179, 490–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbush, V. K. and Mishchenko, M. I. (2011). Opposition optical phenomena in planetary astrophysics: Observational results. In Mishchenko, M. I., Yatskiv, Ya. S., Rosenbush, V. K., and Videen, G., eds., Polarimetric Detection, Characterization, and Remote Sensing. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, pp. 409–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbush, V. K., Avramchuk, V. V., Rosenbush, A. E., and Mishchenko, M. I. (1997). Polarization properties of the Galilean satellites of Jupiter: Observations and preliminary analysis. The Astrophysical Journal, 487, 402–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbush, V. K., Kiselev, N. N., Jockers, K.et al. (2000). Optical polarimetry of the Galilean satellites, Iapetus, and 64 Angelina near opposition. Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies, Supplement Series, 3, 227–230.Google Scholar

Rosenbush, V., Kiselev, N., Avramchuk, V., and Mishchenko, M. (2002). Photometric and polarimetric opposition phenomena exhibited by solar system bodies. In Videen, G. and Kocifaj, M., eds., Optics of Cosmic Dust. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 191–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbush, V. K., Kiselev, N. N., Shevchenko, V. G.et al. (2005). Polarization and brightness opposition effects for the E-type asteroid 64 Angelina. Icarus, 178, 222–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbush, V. K., Shevchenko, V. G., Kiselev, N. N.et al. (2009). Polarization and brightness opposition effects for the E-type asteroid 44 Nysa. Icarus, 201, 655–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbush, V. K., Kiselev, N. N., Zaitsev, S. V.et al. (2012). Opposition optical phenomena in Solar System bodies: Observational results. In Asteroids, Comets, Meteors. Houston: LPI. LPI Contribution No. 1667, id. 6130.Google Scholar

Russell, E. E., Brown, F. G., Chandos, R. A.et al. (1992). Galileo Photopolarimeter/Radiometer experiment. Space Science Reviews, 60, 531–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitt, B., De Bergh, C., and Festou, M., eds. (1998). Ices in the Solar System, Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Serkowsky, K. (1974). Polarimeters for optical astronomy. In Gehrels, T., ed., Planets, Stars and Nebulae Studied with Photopolarimetry. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, pp. 135–174.Google Scholar

Shakhovskoj, N. M. (1994). Methods for analysis of polarization observations. Bulletin of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, 91, 106–123 [in Russian].Google Scholar

Shakhovskoy, N. M. and Efimov, Yu. S. (1972). Polarization observations of nonstable stars and extragalactic objects. I: Equipment, method of observation and reduction. Bulletin of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, 45, 90–110 [in Russian].Google Scholar

Shakhovskoy, N. M. and Efimov, Yu. S. (1976). Observations of linear polarization of optical emission from X-ray sources. Bulletin of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, 54, 99–119 [in Russian].Google Scholar

Shevchenko, V. G., Belskaya, I. N., and Tereschenko, I. A. (2010). The diversity of the opposition effect of dark asteroids. In Proceedings of the 41st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Houston: LPI. LPI Contribution No. 1533, 1131.Google Scholar