Book contents
- Poetry and Number in Graeco-Roman Antiquity
- Cambridge Classical Studies
- Poetry and Number in Graeco-Roman Antiquity
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations and Editions
- Introduction Numbers Up
- Part I Counting and Criticism
- Part II Arithmetic and Aesthetics
- Conclusion Summing Up Poetry
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2022
Book contents
- Poetry and Number in Graeco-Roman Antiquity
- Cambridge Classical Studies
- Poetry and Number in Graeco-Roman Antiquity
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations and Editions
- Introduction Numbers Up
- Part I Counting and Criticism
- Part II Arithmetic and Aesthetics
- Conclusion Summing Up Poetry
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Poetry and Number in Graeco-Roman Antiquity , pp. 213 - 226Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
- Creative Commons
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/
References
Acerbi, F. (2003) ‘On the shoulders of Hipparchus’. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 57: 465–502.Google Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B. (2002) Polyeideia: the Iambi of Callimachus and the Archaic Iambic Tradition. London.Google Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B. and Stephens, S. A. (2001) ‘Aetia fr. 1.5: I told my story like a child’. ZPE 136: 214–16.Google Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B. and Stephens, S. A. (2002) ‘Rereading Callimachus’ Aetia fragment 1’. CPh 97: 238–55.Google Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B. and Stephens, S. A. (2012) Callimachus in Context: from Plato to the Augustan Poets. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B., Kosmetatou, E. and Baumbach, M. (eds.) (2004) Labored in Papyrus Leaves: Perspectives on an Epigram Collection Attributed to Posidippus (P. Mil. Vogl. VIII 309). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L. and Stephens, S. (eds.) (2011) Brill’s Companion to Callimachus. Leiden.Google Scholar
Allard, A. (1980) ‘Diophante d’Alexandrie: les Arithmétiques, histoire du texte grec, édition critique, traductions et scolies’, 2 vols. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Louvain.Google Scholar
Amthor, A. (1880) ‘Das problema bovinum des Archimedes’. Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik 25: 153–71.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. (1993) The Second Sophistic: a Cultural Phenomenon in the Roman Empire. London.Google Scholar
Asper, M. (2001) ‘Gruppen und Dichter: zu Programmatik und Adressatenbezug bei Kallimachos’. A&A 47: 84–116.Google Scholar
Asper, M. (2009) ‘The two cultures of mathematics in ancient Greece’, in Robson, E. and Stedall, J. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the History of Mathematics. Oxford: 107–32.Google Scholar
Asquith, H. (2005) ‘From genealogy to catalogue: the Hellenistic adaptation of the Hesiodic catalogue form’, in Hunter, R. (ed.) The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions. Cambridge: 266–86.Google Scholar
Ast, R. and Lougovaya, J. (2015) ‘The art of the isopsephism in the Greco-Roman world’, in Jördens, A. (ed.) Ägyptische Magie und ihre Umwelt. Wiesbaden: 82–98.Google Scholar
Belloni, L. (2015) ‘Gemma e simposio nel nuovo Posidippo: con una nota sul κισσύβιον teocriteo (P. Mil. Vogl. VIII, 309, col. I, 10–13 = 3 A.–B.; Theocr. 1, 30ss.)’. WS 128: 49–61.Google Scholar
Benson, G. C. (2014) ‘Archimedes the poet: generic innovation and mathematical fantasy in the Cattle Problem’. Arethusa 47: 169–96.Google Scholar
Bernand, É. (1969) Inscriptions métriques de l’Égypte gréco-romaine: recherches sur la poésie épigrammatique des grecs en Égypte. Paris.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (1998) ‘Between literature and the monuments’, in Harder, A. M., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.) Genre in Hellenistic Poetry. Leuven: 21–43.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (2005) ‘The politics and poetics of geography in the Milan Posidippus Section One: On Stones (AB 1–20)’, in Gutzwiller (2005): 119–40.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (2009) The Scroll and the Marble: Studies in Reading and Reception in Hellenistic Poetry. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (2017) ‘Homer in the Σωρός’, in Durbec, Y. and Trajber, F. (eds.) Traditions épiques et poésie épigrammatique. Leuven: 99–113.Google Scholar
Blum, R. (1991) Kallimachos: the Alexandrian Library and the Origins of Bibliography. Trans. Wellisch, H.. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2002) ‘XII – Chrysippus and the epistemic theory of vagueness’. PAS 102: 217–38.Google Scholar
Brügger, C., Stoevesandt, M. and Visser, E. (2003) Homers Ilias Gesamtkommentar Band II: Zweiter Gesang (B) – Faszikel 2: Kommentar. Berlin.Google Scholar
Buffière, F. (1970) Anthologie grecque: première partie, Anthologie palatine. Tome XII (Livres XIII–XV). Paris.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1972) Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. Trans. Minar, E. L.. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Burr, V. (1944) ΝΕΩΝ ΚΑΤΑΛΟΓΟΣ: Untersuchungen zum homerischen Schiffskatalog. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Butrica, J. L. (2007) ‘History and transmission of the text’, in Skinner, M. B. (ed.) A Companion to Catullus. Oxford: 11–34.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (1970) ‘Michael Psellus and the date of the Palatine Anthology’. GRBS 11: 339–50.Google Scholar
Cerri, G. (2005) ‘L’ontano di Filita: soluzione di un enigma e ricostruzione di un percorso critico’. QUCC 80: 133–9.Google Scholar
Christianidis, J. and Megremi, A. (2019) ‘Tracing the early history of algebra: testimonies on Diophantus in the Greek-speaking world (4th–7th century ce)’. Historia Mathematica 47: 16–38.Google Scholar
Christianidis, J. and Oaks, J. (2013) ‘Practicing algebra in late antiquity: the problem-solving of Diophantus of Alexandria’. Historia Mathematica 40: 127–63.Google Scholar
Clayman, D. L. (1977) ‘The origins of Greek literary criticism and the Aitia prologue’. WS 11: 27–34.Google Scholar
Collins, D. (2004) Master of the Game: Competition and Performance in Greek Poetry. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Corner, S. (2010) ‘Transcendent drinking: the symposium at sea reconsidered’. CQ 60: 352–80.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. (1994) ‘A Homeric writing exercise and reading Homer in school’. Tyche 9: 1–8.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. (2001) Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Cuomo, S. (2007a) ‘Measures for an emperor: Volusius Maecianus’ monetary pamphlet for Marcus Aurelius’, in Whitmarsh, T. and König, J. (eds.) Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire. Cambridge: 206–28.Google Scholar
Cuomo, S. (2011) ‘All the proconsul’s men: Cicero, Verres, and account-keeping’. AION 15: 165–88.Google Scholar
Cuomo, S. (2012) ‘Exploring ancient Greek and Roman numeracy’. BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics 27: 1–12.Google Scholar
Cuomo, S. (2013) ‘Accounts, numeracy and democracy in Classical Athens’, in Asper, M. (ed.) Writing Science: Medical and Mathematical Authorship in Ancient Greece. Berlin: 255–78.Google Scholar
Cuomo, S. (2019) ‘Mathematical traditions in Ancient Greece and Rome’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 9: 75–85.Google Scholar
Curtius, E. R. (1953) European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. Trans. Trask, W. R.. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
De Vasconcellos, P. S. (2015) ‘Milia multa basiorum once more: a proposal for an intertextual reading’. Hermes 143: 57–71.Google Scholar
Dettmer, H. (1997) Love by the Numbers: Form and Meaning in the Poetry of Catullus. New York.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, S. D. (2012) ‘“Horae” in Roman funerary inscriptions’. Unpublished Masters thesis, University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. H. (2016) Beware the Evil Eye: the Evil Eye in the Bible and the Ancient World, 3 vols. Eugene, OR.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. and Hernández Lobato, J. (2017) The Poetics of Late Latin Literature. New York.Google Scholar
Erskine, A. (1995) ‘Culture and power in Ptolemaic Egypt: the Museum and Library of Alexandria’. Greece & Rome 42: 38–48.Google Scholar
Erskine, A. (2001) Troy between Greece and Rome: Local Tradition and Imperial Power. Oxford.Google Scholar
Erskine, A. (2002) ‘O Brother, where art thou? Tales of kinship and diplomacy’, in Ogden, D. (ed.) The Hellenistic World: New Perspectives. Swansea: 97–115.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. (2004) Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (1999) Catullan Provocations: Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Flores, E. and Polara, G. (1969) ‘Specimina di analisi applicate a structure di “Versspielerei” latina’. Rendiconti dell’Accademia di archeologia, lettere, e belle arti di Napoli 45: 111–36.Google Scholar
Foley, H. P. (1994) The Homeric Hymn to Demeter: Translation, Commentary, and Interpretive Essays. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. H. (1999) The Mathematics of Plato’s Academy: a New Reconstruction, 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Franks, H. M. (2018) The World Underfoot: Mosaics and Metaphor in the Greek Symposium. New York.Google Scholar
Fuqua, C. (2002) ‘The urbanitas of Catullus 6’. Scholia: Studies in Classical Antiquity 11: 25–33.Google Scholar
Gagné, R. (2016) ‘The world in a cup: ekpomatics in and out of the symposium’, in Obbink, D., Cazzato, V. and Prodi, E. E. (eds.) The Cup of Song: Ancient Greek Poetry and the Symposium. Oxford: 207–29.Google Scholar
Gantz, T. (1993) Early Greek Myth: a Guide to Literary and Artistic Sources. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Geffcken, J. (1925) ‘Leonidas von Alexandreia’, in Pauly, A. F. and Wissowa, G. (eds.) Real-Encyclopaedie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Vol. 12. Stuttgart: 2031–3.Google Scholar
Gomme, A. W., Andrewes, A. and Dover, K. J. (1970) A Historical Commentary on Thucydides. Oxford.Google Scholar
González Iglesias, J. A. (2000) ‘El intertexto absoluto: Optaciano Porfirio, entre Virgilio y Mallarmé’, in Bécares, V., Fernández Corte, J. C., Cortés Tovar, R. and Pordomingo, F. (eds.) Intertextualidad en las literaturas griega y Latina. Madrid: 337–66.Google Scholar
Gow, A. S. F. and Page, D. L. (1965) The Greek Anthology: Hellenistic Epigrams. Text and Commentary, 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gow, A. S. F. and Page, D. L. (1968) The Greek Anthology: the Garland of Philip, and Some Contemporary Epigrams, 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. (2005) ‘Virgil’s sibyl and the “many mouths” cliché (Aen. 6.625–7)’, CQ 55: 170–82.Google Scholar
Grandolini, S. (2006) ‘Sugli epigrammi aritmetici nell’Anthologia Palatina: riflessi letterari ed aspetti di vita quotidiana nell’insegnamento dell’aritmetica’, Giornale Italiano di Filologia 58: 341–53.Google Scholar
Greensmith, E. (2020) The Resurrection of Homer in Imperial Greek Epic: Quintus Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica and the Poetics of Impersonation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. (2015) ‘The earliest Greek systems of education’, in Bloomer, W. M. (ed.) A Companion to Ancient Education. Oxford: 26–60.Google Scholar
Grillo, F. (2019) ‘Too many Metrodoruses? The compiler of the ἀριθμητικά from AP XIV’. Eikasmos 30: 249–64.Google Scholar
Grillo, F. (2021) ‘Socrates (AP 14.1[–64]): a Pythagorising Middle Platonist?’. Mnemosyne. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525X-bja10077.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. (2002) ‘Posidippus on statuary’, in Bastianini, G. and Casanova, A. (eds.) Il papiro di Posidippo un anno dopo. Florence: 41–60.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. (2019) ‘The reception of Callimachus in Meleager’, in Klooster et al. (2019): 95–120.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. (2020) ‘Under the sign of the distaff: Aetia 1.5, spinning and Erinna’. CQ 70: 177–91.Google Scholar
Halliwell, J. O. (1839) Rara mathematica: or, a Collection of Treatises on the Mathematics and Subjects Connected with Them, from Ancient Inedited Manuscripts, 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S., Russell, D. A. and Innes, D. (1995) Aristotle Poetics; Longinus On the Sublime; Demetrius On Style. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Harder, A. M. (2002) ‘Intertextuality in Callimachus’ Aetia’, in Lehnus, L. (ed.) Callimaque: sept exposés suivis de discussions. Geneva: 189–233.Google Scholar
Harder, A. M. (2012) Callimachus, Aetia: Introduction, Text, Translation and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Heath, T. L. (1910) Diophantus of Alexandria: a Study in the History of Greek Algebra. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1993) ‘“Who’s counting?” – Catullus by numbers’. Liverpool Latin Seminar 3: 243–54.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1997) ‘The name of the tree: recounting Odyssey XXIV 340–2’. JHS 117: 87–116.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1987) The Metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the Self-conscious Muse. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hooper, R. W. (1985) ‘In defence of Catullus’ dirty sparrow’. Greece & Rome 32: 162–78.Google Scholar
Hope Simpson, R. and Lazenby, J. F. (1970) The Catalogue of the Ships in Homer’s Iliad. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (2015) Lykophron, Alexandra: Greek Text, Translation, Commentary, and Introduction. Oxford.Google Scholar
Höschele, R. (2007) ‘The traveling reader: journeys through ancient epigram books’. TAPhA 137: 333–69.Google Scholar
Hultsch, F. O. (1965) Pappus Alexandrinus collectionis quae supersunt. Vol. 1. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2004) ‘Notes on the Lithika of Posidippus’, in Acosta-Hughes et al. (2004): 94–104.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2006) The Shadow of Callimachus: Studies in the Reception of Hellenistic Poetry at Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2009) Critical Moments in Classical Literature: Studies in the Ancient View of Literature and Its Uses. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2011) ‘The reputation of Callimachus’, in Obbink, D. and Rutherford, R. B. (eds.) Culture in Pieces: Essays on Ancient Texts in Honour of Peter Parsons. Oxford: 220–38.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2019) ‘Death of a child: grief beyond the literary?’, in Carey, C., Petrovic, I. and Kanellou, M. (eds.) Greek Epigram from the Hellenistic to the Early Byzantine Era. Oxford: 137–53.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (forthcoming) ‘Callimachus and the description of rhetorical style’, in Perale, M., Kwapisz, J., Taietti, G. and Cartlidge, B. (eds.) Hellenistic Poetry before Callimachus: a Handbook. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2012) ‘Booking lovers: desire and design in Catullus’, in Du Quesnay, I. M. L. M. and Woodman, A. J. (eds.) Catullus: Poems, Books, Readers. Cambridge: 48–78.Google Scholar
Isager, S. (1998) ‘The pride of Halikarnassos: editio princeps of an inscription from Salmakis’. ZPE 123: 1–23.Google Scholar
Jannaris, A. N. (1907) ‘The Digamma, Koppa, and Sampi as numerals in Greek’. CQ 1: 37–40.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1980) ‘On some unnecessarily indecent interpretations of Catullus 2 and 3’. AJPh 101: 421–41.Google Scholar
Kim, L. (2010) Homer between History and Fiction in Imperial Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Klein, J. (1968) Greek Mathematical Thought and the Origin of Algebra. Trans. Brann, E.. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Klooster, J., Harder, A. M., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.) (2019) Callimachus Revisited: New Perspectives in Callimachean Scholarship. Leuven.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. (2007) ‘Catullus and Callimachus’, in Skinner, M. B. (ed.) A Companion to Catullus. Oxford: 151–72.Google Scholar
Köhnken, A. (1981) ‘Apollo’s retort to Envy’s criticism (two questions of relevance in Callimachus, Hymn 2, 105ff.)’. AJPh 102: 411–22.Google Scholar
Krischer, T. (1965) ‘Die Entschuldigung des Sängers (Ilias B 484–493)’, RhM 108: 1–11.Google Scholar
Kroll, W. (1926) Historia Alexandri Magni: Pseudo-Callisthenes. Vol. 1, Recensio vetusta. Berlin.Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. A. (2007) ‘Catullus and elite Republican social discourse’, in Skinner, M. B. (ed.) A Companion to Catullus. Oxford: 212–32.Google Scholar
Krumbiegel, B. (1880) ‘Das Problema bovinum des Archimedes’. Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik 25: 121–36.Google Scholar
Kuttner, A. (2005) ‘Cabinet fit for a queen: the Λιθικά as Posidippus’ gem museum’, in Gutzwiller (2005): 141–63.Google Scholar
Kwapisz, J. (2013b) ‘Were there Hellenistic riddle books?’, in Kwapisz, J., Petrain, D. and Szymanski, M. (eds.) The Muse at Play: Riddles and Wordplay in Greek and Latin Poetry. Berlin: 148–67.Google Scholar
Kwapisz, J. (2014) ‘Kraters, myrtle, and Hellenistic poetry’, in Harder, A. M., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.) Hellenistic Poetry in Context. Leuven: 195–215.Google Scholar
Kwapisz, J. (2017) ‘Optatian and the order of court riddlers’, in Squire and Wienand (2017): 165–90.Google Scholar
Kwapisz, J. (2020a) ‘Socrates’ answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe and everything: explaining the arithmetical riddles of AP 14’. AJPh 141: 457–86.Google Scholar
Leary, T. J. (2014) Symphosius, the Aenigmata: an Introduction, Text and Commentary. London.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. (1980) ‘The quarrel between Callimachus and Apollonius’. ZPE 40: 1–19.Google Scholar
Leitao, D. D. (2012) The Pregnant Male as Myth and Metaphor in Classical Greek Literature. New York.Google Scholar
Lenz, A. (1980) Das Proöm des frühen griechischen Epos: ein Beitrag zum poetischen Selbstverständnis. Bonn.Google Scholar
Leventhal, M. (2015) ‘Counting on epic: mathematical poetry and Homeric epic in Archimedes’ Cattle Problem’. Ramus 44: 200–21.Google Scholar
Levitan, W. (1985) ‘Dancing at the end of the rope: Optatian Porfyry and the field of Roman verse’. TAPhA 115: 245–69.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. L. (2014) Description of the Known World: Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lorenz, S. (2007) ‘Catullus and Martial’, in Skinner, M. B. (ed.) A Companion to Catullus. Oxford: 418–38.Google Scholar
Lowe, D. (2012) ‘Triple tipple: Ausonius’ Griphus ternarii numeri’, in Kwapisz, J., Petrain, D. and Szymanski, M. (eds.) The Muse at Play: Riddles and Wordplay in Greek and Latin Poetry. Berlin: 333–50.Google Scholar
Lowe, D. (2013) ‘Women scorned: a new stichometric allusion in the Aeneid’. CQ 63: 442–5.Google Scholar
Luz, C. (2013) ‘What has it got in its pocketses? Or, what makes a riddle a riddle?’, in Kwapisz, J., Petrain, D. and Szymanski, M. (eds.) The Muse at Play: Riddles and Wordplay in Greek and Latin Poetry. Berlin: 83–99.Google Scholar
Maltomini, F. (2008) Tradizione antologica dell’epigramma greco: le sillogi minori di età bizantina e umanistica. Rome.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1971) The Pseudo-Hippocratic Tract [Peri hebdomadōn]: Ch. 1–11 and Greek Philosophy. Assen.Google Scholar
McGill, S. (2005) Virgil Recomposed: the Mythological and Secular Centos in Antiquity. New York.Google Scholar
Mendell, H. (2018) ‘Why did the Greeks develop proportion theory? A conjecture’, in Sialaros, M. (ed.) Revolutions and Continuity in Greek Mathematics. Berlin: 189–233.Google Scholar
Mojsik, T. (2011) Between Tradition and Innovation: Genealogy, Names and the Number of the Muses. Trans. Fijak, M.. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Morelli, G. (2009) ‘Lo Stomachion di Archimede nelle testimonianze antiche’, Bollettino di storia scienze matematiche 29: 181–206.Google Scholar
Nelson, H. L. (1981) ‘A solution to Archimedes’ Cattle Problem’. Journal of Recreational Mathematics 13: 162–76.Google Scholar
Nelson, T. J. (2018) ‘The shadow of Aristophanes: Hellenistic poetry’s reception of comic poetics’, in Harder, A. M., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.) Drama and Performance in Hellenistic Poetry. Leuven: 225–71.Google Scholar
Nesselmann, G. H. F. (1842) Versuch einer kritischen Geschichte der Algebra: I, die Algebra der Griechen. Berlin.Google Scholar
Netz, R. (1999) The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: a Study in Cognitive History. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Netz, R. (2002a) ‘Greek mathematicians: a group picture’, in Tuplin, C. and Rihll, T. E. (eds.) Science and Mathematics in Ancient Greek Culture. Oxford: 196–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netz, R. (2002b) ‘Counter culture: towards a history of Greek numeracy’. History of Science 40: 321–52.Google Scholar
Netz, R. (2009) Ludic Proof: Greek Mathematics and the Alexandrian Aesthetic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Netz, R., Acerbi, F. and Wilson, N. (2004) ‘Towards a reconstruction of Archimedes’ Stomachion’. Sciamus 5: 67–99.Google Scholar
Netz, R., Tchernetska, N. and Wilson, N. (eds.) (2011) The Archimedes Palimpsest, 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Newman, J. K. (1990) Roman Catullus and the Modification of the Alexandrian Sensibility. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Nisbet, G. (2003) Greek Epigram in the Roman Empire: Martial’s Forgotten Rivals. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. (2009) The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pelttari, A. (2014) The Space That Remains: Reading Latin Poetry in Late Antiquity. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Petrain, D. (2005) ‘Gems, metapoetics, and value: Greek and Roman responses to a third-century discourse on precious stones’. TAPhA 135: 329–57.Google Scholar
Petrovic, I. (2006) ‘Delusions of grandeur: Homer, Zeus and the Telchines in Callimachus’ Reply (Aitia Fr. 1) and Iambus 6’. A&A 52: 16–41.Google Scholar
Petrovic, I. (2012) ‘Callimachus’ Hymn to Apollo and Greek metrical sacred regulations’, in Harder, A. M., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.) Gods and Religion in Hellenistic Poetry. Leuven: 264–85.Google Scholar
Pipitone, G. (2012) Dalla figura all’interpretazione. Scoli a Optaziano Porfirio: testo italiano e latino. Naples.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (1992) ‘Hermeneutic lines and circles: Aristarchus and Crates on the exegesis of Homer’, in Lamberton, R. and Keaney, J. J. (eds.) Homer’s Ancient Readers: the Hermeneutics of Greek Epic’s Earliest Exegetes. Princeton, NJ: 67–114.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2011) ‘Against λεπτóτης: rethinking Hellenistic aesthetics’, in Erskine, A., Llewellyn-Jones, L. and Winder, S. (eds.) Creating a Hellenistic World. Swansea: 271–312.Google Scholar
Puelma, M. and Angiò, F. (2005) ‘Die Sonnenuhr und das Mädchen: Kommentar zu einem Grabepigramm des neuen Poseidippos (“P. Mil. Vogl.” VIII 309, Kol. VIII 25–30 = ep. 52 A.-B.)’. ZPE 151: 15–29.Google Scholar
Rashed, R. and Houzel, C. (2013) Les Arithmétiques de Diophante: lecture historique et mathématique. Berlin.Google Scholar
Reitzenstein, R. (1893) Epigramm und Skolion: ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der alexandrinischen Dichtung. Giessen.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (1981) ‘The Contest of Homer and Hesiod and Alcidamas’ Mouseion’. CQ 31: 1–10.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (1985) ‘Pindar and later literary criticism in antiquity’. Papers of the Leeds Latin Seminar 5: 383–401.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. (1989) The Jeweled Style: Poetry and Poetics in Late Antiquity. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. M. (2004) ‘Aristophanes’ Frogs and the Contest of Homer and Hesiod’. TAPhA 134: 295–322.Google Scholar
Rubincam, C. (2003) ‘Numbers in Greek poetry and historiography: quantifying Fehling’. CQ 53: 448–63.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1989) ‘Greek criticism of the Empire’, in Kennedy, G. A. (ed.) The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Vol. 1. Cambridge: 297–329.Google Scholar
Russo, J., Fernández-Galiano, M. and Heubeck, A. (1992) A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey: Books XVII–XXIV. Vol. 3. Oxford.Google Scholar
Scaffai, M. (1997) Baebii Italici Ilias Latina: introduzione, edizione critica, traduzione italiana e commento. Bologna.Google Scholar
Schafer, J. K. (2017) ‘Authorial pagination in the Eclogues and Georgics’. TAPhA 147: 135–78.Google Scholar
Schierl, P. and Scheidegger-Lämmle, C. (2017) ‘Herrscherbilder: Optatian und die Strukturen des Panegyrischen’, in Squire and Wienand (2017): 283–318.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. A. (1999a) ‘“I hate all common things”: the reader’s role in Callimachus’ Aetia prologue’. HSPh 99: 151–78.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. A. (1999b) ‘Performing history in the Second Sophistic’, in Zimmermann, M. (ed.) Geschichtsschreibung und politischer Wandel im 3. Jh. n. Chr. Stuttgart: 71–92.Google Scholar
Schöffel, C. (2002) Martial, Buch 8: Einleitung, Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schwindt, J. P. (2016) ‘The magic of counting: on the cantatoric status of poetry (Catullus 5 and 7; Horace Odes 1.11)’, in Hardie, P. R. (ed.) Augustan Poetry and the Irrational. Oxford: 117–33.Google Scholar
Seager, R. (1974) ‘Venustus, lepidus, bellus, salsus: notes on the language of Catullus’. Latomus 33: 891–4.Google Scholar
Seidensticker, B., Stähli, A., Wessels, A. and Angiò, F. (2015) Die neue Poseidipp: Text – Übersetzung – Kommentar. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Selden, D. L. (1992) ‘Ceveat lector: Catullus and the rhetoric of performance’, in Hexter, R. and Selden, D. (eds.) Innovations of Antiquity. New York: 461–512.Google Scholar
Sens, A. (1997) Theocritus, Dioscuri (Idyll 22): Introduction, Text, and Commentary. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Sens, A. (2007) ‘One thing leads (back) to another: allusion and the invention of tradition in Hellenistic epigrams’, in Bing, P. and Bruss, J. S. (eds.) Brill’s Companion to Hellenistic Epigram. Leiden: 371–90.Google Scholar
Sens, A. (2015) ‘Hedylus (4 and 5 Gow–Page) and Callimachean poetics’. Mnemosyne 68: 40–52.Google Scholar
Sider, D. (2017) ‘The Salmacis inscription’, in Sider, D. (ed.) Hellenistic Poetry: a Selection. Ann Arbor: 32–40.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (1988) ‘Aesthetic patterning in Catullus. Textual structures, systems of imagery and book arrangements: introduction’. CW 81: 337–40.Google Scholar
Sonny, A. (1898) ‘Gerrae und gerro. Ardalio. Mutto. Mutinus. Titinus. Tappo’, Archiv für lateinische Lexikographie und Grammatik 10: 377–84.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (1996) ‘Reading’ Greek Death: to the End of the Classical Period. Oxford.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2010a) ‘Reading a view: poem and picture in the Greek Anthology’. Ramus 39: 73–103.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2010b) ‘Making Myron’s cow moo? Ecphrastic epigram and the poetics of simulation’. AJPh 131: 589–634.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2011) The Iliad in a Nutshell: Visualizing Epic on the Tabulae Iliacae. Oxford.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2017) ‘POP art: the optical poetics of Publilius Optatianus Porfyrius’, in Elsner and Hernández Lobato (2017): 25–99.Google Scholar
Squire, M. and Wienand, J. (eds.) (2017) Morphogrammata. The Lettered Art of Optatian: Figuring Cultural Transformations in the Age of Constantine. Paderborn.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. A. (2015) Callimachus: the Hymns. Edited with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Stewart, D. J. (1976) The Disguised Guest: Rank, Role, and Identity in the Odyssey. Lewisburg, PA.Google Scholar
Stewart, S. (2008) ‘Emending Aratus’ insomnia: Callimachus epigr. 27’. Mnemosyne 61: 586–600.Google Scholar
Struve, J. and Struve, K. L. (1821) Altes griechisches Epigramm mathematischen Inhalts, von Lessing erst einmal zum Drucke befördert, jetzt neu abgedruckt und mathematisch und kritisch behandelt von Dr J. Struve und Dr K. L. Struve, Vater und Sohn. Altona.Google Scholar
Swann, B. W. (1994) Martial’s Catullus: the Reception of an Epigrammatic Rival. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Tannery, P. (1891) ‘Sur une épigramme attribuée à Diophante’. Revue des Études grecques 4: 377–82.Google Scholar
Tannery, P. (1894) ‘Sur les épigrammes arithmétiques de l’Anthologie palatine’. Revue des Études grecques 7: 59–62.Google Scholar
Tannery, P. (1895) Diophanti Alexandrini opera omnia cum Graecis commentariis, 2 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar
Teichmann, J. (2020) ‘Das Rechenbuch des Metrodor: eine Rekonstruktion aus den Epigrammen und Scholien der Anthologia Graeca (Buch 14)’. Hermes 148: 86–118.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. (2007) Monumentality and the Roman Empire: Architecture in the Antonine Age. Oxford.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. J. (1994) ‘Literacy and power in Ptolemaic Egypt’, in Woolf, G. and Bowman, A. K. (eds.) Literacy and Power in the Ancient World. Cambridge: 67–83.Google Scholar
Tsagalis, C. (2008) Inscribing Sorrow: Fourth-century Attic Funerary Epigrams. Berlin.Google Scholar
Tueller, M. A. (2008) Look Who’s Talking: Innovations in Voice and Identity in Hellenistic Epigram. Leuven.Google Scholar
Tueller, M. A. (2021) ‘Collections and editions: Metrodorus in the Greek Anthology’, in Kayachev, B. (ed.) Poems without Poets: Approaches to Anonymous Ancient Poetry. Cambridge: 85–101.Google Scholar
Vardi, I. (1998) ‘Archimedes’ Cattle Problem’. The American Mathematical Monthly 105: 305–19.Google Scholar
Webster, J. D. (1951) ‘The periodicity of the “sevens” in mind, man and nature: a neo-Hippocratic study’. British Journal of Medical Psychology 24: 277–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, H. C., German, R. A. and Zarnke, C. R. (1965) ‘Solution of the cattle problem of Archimedes’. Mathematics of Computation 19: 671–74.Google Scholar
Wimmel, W. (1960) Kallimachos in Rom: die Nachfolge seines apologetischen Dichtens in der Augusteerzeit. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Wurm, J. F. (1830) ‘De Archimedis Problemate bovino’. Jahrbücher für Philologie und Pedagogik 10: 194–202.Google Scholar
Ypsilanti, M. (2018) The Epigrams of Crinagoras of Mytilene: Introduction, Text, Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. I. (2001) ‘Visions and revisions of Homer’, in Goldhill, S. (ed.) Being Greek under Rome. Cambridge: 195–268.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access