Bibliography

Vasilis Politis

doi:10.1017/9781108986243.013

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 June 2021

Vasilis Politis

Show author details

Vasilis Politis: Affiliation:
Trinity College Dublin

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Plato's Essentialism
Reinterpreting the Theory of Forms
, pp. 235 - 242

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108986243.013 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, R. E. (1997) Plato’s Parmenides, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, A. (1969) ‘Socratic Reasoning in the Euthyphro’, The Review of Metaphysics, 22(3), 461–481.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (1981) An Introduction to Plato’s Republic, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (1982) ‘Aristotle on Inefficient Causes’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 32(129), 311–326.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (1986) ‘Classical Greek Philosophy’, in Boardman, J., Griffin, J. and Murray, O., eds., The Oxford History of the Classical World, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 234–253.Google Scholar

Annas, J., and Rowe, C. J. (2003) New Perspectives on Plato, Modern and Ancient, Centre for Hellenic Studies Colloquia 6, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Apelt, O. (1912) Platonische Aufsätze, Berlin: B.G. Teubner Verlag.Google Scholar

Archer-Hind, R. D. (1894) The Phaedo of Plato, 2nd ed., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Balaudé, J.-F. (2004) Hippias Mineur, Hippias Majeur, Paris: Livre de Poche.Google Scholar

Bambrough, R. (1972) ‘The Disunity of Plato’s Thought’, Philosophy, 47(182), 295–307.Google Scholar

Bestor, T. W. (1996) ‘Plato’s Semantics and Plato’s Cave’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 14, 33–82.Google Scholar

Bluck, R. S. (1955) Plato’s Phaedo, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Bluck, R. S. (1956) ‘Logos and Forms in Plato: A Reply to Professor Cross’, Mind, 65(1), 522–529.Google Scholar

Bostock, D. (1986) Plato’s Phaedo, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Brisson, L. (2002) ‘“Is the World One?” A New Interpretation of Plato’s Parmenides’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 22, 1–20.Google Scholar

Broadie, S. (2011) Nature and Divinity in Plato’s Timaeus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. (1976) ‘Plato on the Grammar of Perceiving’, The Classical Quarterly, 26(1), 29–51.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. (1982) ‘Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed’, The Philosophical Review, 91(1), 3–40.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. ([1987] 2012) ‘Platonism and Mathematics: A Prelude to Discussion’, in Graeser, A., ed., Mathematics and Metaphysics in Aristotle, Proceedings of the Tenth Symposium Aristotelicum, Bern: P. Haupt, 213–240. Reprinted in M. F. Burnyeat, Explorations in Ancient and Modern Philosophy, vol. 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 145–172.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F., and Frede, M. (2015a) The Pseudo-Platonic Seventh Letter, Scott, D., ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F., and Frede, M. (2015b) The Seventh Platonic Letter: A Seminar, Scott, D., ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carone, G. R. (2005) Plato’s Cosmology and Its Ethical Dimensions, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Castagnoli, L. (2010) Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument from Democritus to Augustine, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Code, A. (1986) ‘Aristotle: Essence and Accident’, in Warner, R. and Grandy, R. E., eds., Philosophical Grounds of Rationality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 411–439.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. M. (1970) ‘Plato on Sense-Perception and Knowledge (Theaetetus 184–186)’, Phronesis, 15(2), 123–146.Google Scholar

Cornford, F. M. (1935) Plato’s Theory of Knowledge: The Theaetetus and Sophist of Plato, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Cornford, F. M. (1939) Plato and Parmenides, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar

Crivelli, P. (2008) ‘Plato’s Philosophy of Language’, in Fine, G., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Plato, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 217–242.Google Scholar

Crombie, I. M. ([1963] 2013) An Examination of Plato’s Doctrines: II. Plato on Knowledge and Reality, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cross, R. C. (1954) ‘Logos and Forms in Plato’, Mind, 63(3), 433–450.Google Scholar

Dancy, R. M. (2004) Plato’s Introduction of Forms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M. (1997) ‘The Riddle of the Timaeus: Is Plato Sowing Clues?’, in Joyal, M., ed., Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition: Essays Presented to John Whittaker, Abingdon: Routledge, 25–42.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M. (2019) The Roots of Platonism: The Origins and Chief Features of a Philosophical Tradition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R. (1928) ‘The Parmenides of Plato and the Origin of the Neoplatonic “One”’, The Classical Quarterly, 22, 129–142.Google Scholar

Evans, D. (1996) ‘Platonic Arguments: I’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 70, 177–193.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, M. (2006) ‘Knowledge and the Forms in Plato’, in Benson, H. H., ed., A Companion to Plato, Malden: Blackwell, 146–161.Google Scholar

Fine, G. ([1978] 2003) ‘Knowledge and Belief in Republic V’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 60(2), 121–139. Reprinted in G. Fine, Plato on Knowledge and Forms: Selected Essays, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 66–84.Google Scholar

Fine, G. (1987) ‘Forms As Causes: Plato and Aristotle’, in Graeser, A., ed., Mathematics and Metaphysics in Aristotle, Bern: P. Haupt, 69–112.Google Scholar

Fine, G. ([1990] 2003) ‘Knowledge and Belief in Republic V–VII’, in Everson, S., ed., Epistemology, Companions to Ancient Thought, vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in G. Fine, Plato on Knowledge and Forms: Selected Essays, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 85–116.Google Scholar

Fine, G. (1992) ‘Inquiry in the Meno’, in Kraut, R., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Plato, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 200–226.Google Scholar

Fine, G. (1993) On Ideas: Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Fine, G. (2008) ‘Does Socrates Claim to Know That He Knows Nothing?’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 35, 49–85.Google Scholar

Fine, G. (2014) The Possibility of Inquiry: Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fine, G. (2017) ‘Plato on the Grades of Perception: Theaetetus 184–186 and the Phaedo’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 53, 65–109.Google Scholar

Fine, K. (1994) ‘Essence and Modality’, Philosophical Perspectives, 8, 1–16.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1967) Prädikation und Existenzaussage: Platons Gebrauch von “… ist …” und “… ist Nicht …” im Sophistes, Hypomnemata 18, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1980) ‘The Original Notion of Cause’, in Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M. and Barnes, J., eds., Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 217–249.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1992) ‘Plato’s Sophist on False Statements’, in Kraut, R., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Plato, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 397–424.Google Scholar

Frege, G. (1892) ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik, N.F. 100, 25–50.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H.-G. (1985) Gesammelte Werke, Band 5: Griechische Philosophie I, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H.-G. (1991) Gesammelte Werke, Band 7: Griechische Philosophie III: Plato Im Dialog, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar

Gallop, D. (1975) Plato Phaedo, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Geach, P. T. (1966) ‘Plato’s Euthyphro: An Analysis and Commentary’, Monist, 50, 369–382.Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (2020) Platonism and Naturalism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Gill, M. L. (2012) Philosophos: Plato’s Missing Dialogue, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gosling, J. C. B. (1973) Plato. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Gould, C. S. (1995) ‘Grube’s Translation of Republic 476a: A Response to Waterfield’, Ancient Philosophy, 15(2), 681–683.Google Scholar

Greene, B. (1999) The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Hackforth, R. (1952) ‘Plato’s Republic’ [review of Murphy 1951], The Classical Review, N.S. 2(3/4), 158–160.Google Scholar

Hackforth, R. (1955) Plato’s Phaedo, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harte, V. (2008) ‘Plato’s Metaphysics’, in Fine, G., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Plato, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 191–216.Google Scholar

Hamlyn, D. W. (1955) ‘The Communion of Forms and the Development of Plato’s Logic’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 5(21), 289–302.Google Scholar

Hestir, B. E. (2016) Plato on the Metaphysical Foundation of Meaning and Truth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hintikka, J. (2007) Socratic Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Horan, D. (2015) ‘Plotinus’ Use of the Third Hypothesis of Plato’s Parmenides in Enneads: VI.6.13’, Dionysius, N.S. 33, 81–117.Google Scholar

Irwin, T. H. (1977) Plato’s Moral Theory: The Early and Middle Dialogues, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. (2004) Plato’s Natural Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. H. (1985) ‘The Beautiful and the Genuine’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 3, 261–287.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. H. (1992) ‘Vlastos’s Socrates’, Phronesis, 37(2), 233–258.Google Scholar

Karamanolis, G., and Politis, V. (2018) The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Karbowski, J. (2016) ‘Justification “by Argument” in Aristotle’s Natural Science’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 51, 119–160.Google Scholar

Keyt, D. (1969) ‘Plato’s Paradox That the Immutable Is Unknowable’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 19(74), 1–14.Google Scholar

Kirwan, C. (1974) ‘Plato and Relativity’, Phronesis, 19(2), 112–129.Google Scholar

vonKutschera, F. (1995) Platons Parmenides, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Larsen, P. D. (2018) ‘Are There Forms of Sensible Qualities in Plato?’, Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 4(2), 225–242.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lachance, G. (2016) ‘Platonic Contrariety (enantia): Ancestor of the Aristotelian Notion of Contradiction (antiphasis)?’, Logica Universalis, 10, 143–156.Google Scholar

Ledbetter, G. M. (1999) ‘Reasons and Causes in Plato’, Ancient Philosophy, 19(2), 255–265.Google Scholar

Lee, D. C. (2010a) ‘Dialectic and Disagreement in the Hippias Major’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 38, 1–35.Google Scholar

Lee, D. C. (2010b) ‘Interpreting Plato’s Republic: Knowledge and Belief’, Philosophy Compass, 5(10), 854–864.Google Scholar

Lee, D. C. (2013) ‘Drama, Dogmatism, and the “Equals” Argument in Plato’s Phaedo’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 44, 1–39.Google Scholar

Lorenz, H. (2006) The Brute Within: Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ludlam, I. (1991) Hippias Major: An Interpretation, Stuttgart: F. Steiner.Google Scholar

Malcolm, J. (1968) ‘On the Place of the Hippias Major in the Development of Plato’s Thought’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 50(3), 189–195.Google Scholar

Malcolm, J. (1991) Plato on the Self-Predication of Forms: Early and Middle Dialogues, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Mann, W.-R. (2000) The Discovery of Things: Aristotle’s Categories and Their Context, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

McCabe, M. M. (1994) Plato’s Individuals, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

McCabe, M. M. ‘The Unity of Virtue: Plato’s Models of Philosophy’, Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume XC, 1–25.Google Scholar

Meinwald, C. C. (1991) Plato’s Parmenides, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, J. M. E. (1973) ‘The Anatomy of Plato’s Divisions’, in Lee, E. N., Mourelatos, A. P. D. and Rorty, R. M., eds., Exegesis and Argument: Studies in Greek Philosophy Presented to Gregory Vlastos, Assen: Van Gorcum, 324–348.Google Scholar

Moss, J. (2008) ‘Appearances and Calculations: Plato’s Division of the Soul’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 34, 35–68.Google Scholar

Muniz, F., and Rudebusch, G. (2004) ‘Plato, Philebus 15B: A Problem Solved’, The Classical Quarterly, N.S. 54(2), 394–405.Google Scholar

Murphy, N. R. (1951) The Interpretation of Plato’s Republic, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Natorp, P. (1903) Platos Ideenlehre: Eine Einführung in den Idealismus, Leipzig: Meiner.Google Scholar

Natorp, P. (2004) Plato’s Theory of Ideas: An Introduction to Idealism, International Plato Studies 18, Politis, V., ed., Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar

Nehamas, A. (1973) ‘Predication and Forms of Opposites in the Phaedo’, The Review of Metaphysics, 26(3), 461–491.Google Scholar

Nehamas, A. (1975a) ‘Plato on the Imperfection of the Sensible World’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 12(2), 105–117.Google Scholar

Nehamas, A. (1975b) ‘Confusing Universals and Particulars in Plato’s Early Dialogues’, The Review of Metaphysics, 29(2), 287–306.Google Scholar

Nettleship, R. L. (1958) Lectures on the Republic of Plato, 2nd ed., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Nightingale, A. (2004) Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in Its Cultural Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Oderberg, D. S. (2007) Real Essentialism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

O’Reilly, K. R. (2019) ‘The Jellyfish’s Pleasures: Philebus 20b–21d’, Phronesis, 64(3), 277–291.CrossRef Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. ([1957] 1986) ‘A Proof in the ΠΕΡΙ ΙΔΕΩΝ’, The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 77(1), 103–111. Reprinted in M. C. Nussbaum, ed., Logic, Science and Dialectic: Collected Papers in Greek Philosophy, New York: Cornell University Press, 65–84.Google Scholar

Pappas, N. (1995) Plato and the Republic, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Patterson, R. (1985) Image and Reality in Plato’s Metaphysics, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Patterson, R. (2009) ‘Plato: Arguments for Forms’, in Le Poidevin, R., Simons, P., McGonigal, A. and Cameron, R. P., eds., The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics, London: Routledge, 18–28.Google Scholar

Petrucci, F. M. (2016) ‘L’autenticità dell’ Ippia Maggiore’, in Tulli, M., ed., Testo e Forme del Testo: Ricerche di Filologia Filosofica, Ricerche di Filologia Classica VII, Pisa: Fabrizio Serra, 105–143.Google Scholar

Politis, V. (2010) ‘Explanation and Essence in Plato’s Phaedo’, in Charles, D., ed., Definition in Greek Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 62–114.Google Scholar

Politis, V. (2012) ‘What Is Behind the ti esti Question?’, in Fink, J. L., ed., The Development of Dialectic from Plato to Aristotle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 199–223.Google Scholar

Politis, V. (2015) The Structure of Enquiry in Plato’s Early Dialogues, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Politis, V. (2018a) ‘Plato’s Geach Talks to Socrates: Definition by Example and Exemplar in the Hippias Major’, Phronesis, 63(3), 223–228.Google Scholar

Politis, V. (2018b) ‘Aporia and Sceptical Argument in Plato’s Early Dialogues’, in Karamanolis, G. and Politis, V., eds., The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Politis, V. (2020) ‘The Relation between Knowledge and Enquiry in the Phaedo’, History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis, 23(1), 51–73.Google Scholar

Politis, V. (forthcoming) ‘Note on Plato’s Statesman 275D8–E1’, The Classical Quarterly.Google Scholar

Politis, V., and Jun, S. (2017) ‘The Concept of Ousia in Metaphysics Alpha, Beta, and Gamma’, in Wians, W. and Polansky, R., eds., Reading Aristotle: Argument and Exposition, Leiden: Brill, 257–276.Google Scholar

Politis, V., and Steinkrüger, P. (2017) ‘Aristotle’s Second Problem about a Science of Being qua Being: A Reconsideration of Metaphysics iv 2’, Ancient Philosophy, 37(1), 59–89.Google Scholar

Prauss, G. (1966) Platon und der Logische Eleatismus, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Priest, G. (1998) ‘What Is So Bad about Contradictions?’, The Journal of Philosophy, 95(8), 410–426.Google Scholar

Prior, W. J. (1998) ‘Plato and the “Socratic Fallacy”’, Phronesis, 43(2), 97–113.Google Scholar

Reeve, C. D. C. (1989) Socrates in the Apology, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Rickless, S. C. (2007) Plato’s Forms in Transition: A Reading of the Parmenides, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Robinson, R. (1950) ‘Forms and Error in Plato’s Theaetetus’, The Philosophical Review, 59(1), 3–30.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, E. (2019) ‘More Than a Reductio: Plato’s Method in the Parmenides and Lysis’, Études platoniciennes, 15. doi.org/10.4000/etudesplatoniciennes.1509.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, E. (2020) ‘Aristotle’s Platonic Response to the Problem of First Principles’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 58, 449–469.Google Scholar

Ross, D. (1951) Plato’s Theory of Ideas, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Rowe, C. J. (2007) Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rowett, C. (2016) ‘Why the Philosopher Kings Will Believe the Noble Lie’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 50, 67–100.Google Scholar

Rowett, C. (2018) Knowledge and Truth in Plato: Stepping Past the Shadow of Socrates, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ruben, D.-H. (1990) Explaining Explanation, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ryle, G. ([1939] 1965) ‘Plato’s Parmenides’, Mind, 48(190/191), 129–151, 302–325. Reprinted in R. E. Allen, ed., Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 97–147.Google Scholar

Ryle, G. (1990) ‘Logical Atomism in Plato’s Theaetetus’, Phronesis, 35(1), 21–46.Google Scholar

Santas, G. X. (1972) ‘The Socratic Fallacy’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 10(2), 127–141.Google Scholar

Sayre, K. M. (2008) ‘[Rickless 2007] (review)’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 46(1), 169–170.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. (1998) ‘Platonic Causes’, Phronesis, 43(2), 114–132.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. (2007a) ‘Equal Sticks and Stones’, in Scott, D., ed., Maieusis: Essays in Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 68–86.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. (2007b) Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Sedley, D., and Long, A. (2010) Plato: Meno and Phaedo, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Silverman, A. (2002) The Dialectic of Essence, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, J. A. (1917) ‘General Relative Clauses in Greek’, The Classical Review, 31(3/4), 69–71.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. (1988) Matter, Space, and Motion, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Stenzel, J. (1931) Studien zur Entwicklung der platonischen Dialektik von Sokrates zu Aristoteles, 2nd ed., Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Storey, D. (2014) ‘Appearance, Perception, and Non-Rational Belief: Republic 602c–603a’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 47, 81–118.Google Scholar

Taylor, A. E. (1926) Plato: The Man and His Work, London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. C. W. (1969) ‘Forms As Causes in the Phaedo’, Mind, 78(309), 45–59.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. C. W. (2008) ‘Plato’s Epistemology’, in Fine, G., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Plato, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 165–190.Google Scholar

Teloh, H. (1981) The Development of Plato’s Metaphysics, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Tuozzo, T. M. (2018) ‘“Appearing Equal” at Phaedo 74B4–C6: An Epistemic Interpretation’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 54, 1–26.Google Scholar

Vlastos, G. (1954) ‘The Third Man Argument in the Parmenides’, The Philosophical Review, 63(3), 319–349.Google Scholar

Vlastos, G. (1969) ‘Reasons and Causes in the Phaedo’, The Philosophical Review, 78(3), 291–325.Google Scholar

Vlastos, G. ([1985] 1994) ‘Socrates’ Disavowal of Knowledge’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 35(138), 1–31. Reprinted in M. Burnyeat, ed., Socratic Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 39–66.Google Scholar

Vlastos, G. ([1990] 1994) ‘Is the “Socratic Fallacy” Socratic?’, Ancient Philosophy, 10(1), 1–16. Reprinted in M. Burnyeat, ed., Socratic Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 67–86.Google Scholar

Wedgwood, R. (2018) ‘Plato’s Theory of Knowledge’, in Brink, D. O., Meyer, S. S. and Shields, C., eds., Virtue, Happiness, Knowledge: Themes from the Work of Gail Fine and Terence Irwin, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 33–56.Google Scholar

White, F. C. (1981) Plato’s Theory of Particulars, New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar

White, N. P. (1992) ‘Plato’s Metaphysical Epistemology’, in Kraut, R., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Plato, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 311–337.Google Scholar

Wolfsdorf, D. (2004) ‘The Socratic Fallacy and the Epistemological Priority of Definitional Knowledge’, Apeiron, 37(1), 35–68.Google Scholar

Wolfsdorf, D. (2005) ‘Αἴτιον and Αἰτία in Plato’, Ancient Philosophy, 25(2), 341–348.Google Scholar

Woodruff, P. (1982) Hippias Major, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Woodruff, P. (1987) ‘Expert Knowledge in the Apology and Laches: What a General Needs to Know’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 3(1), 79–115.Google Scholar

Woodruff, P. (1990) ‘Plato’s Early Theory of Knowledge’, in Everson, S., ed., Epistemology, Cambridge, 60–84.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive